The concept of "curve families" is very important in mathematics, as there are many situations in which there are an entire range of answers to a particular equation. The most prominent examples occur in the realm of differential equations - equations involving derivatives of functions - where the graph of the solutions might include a very large number of different curves.
For example, on the right we see that there are multiple curves, all with different equations, that are solutions for the differential equation . These curves can be thought of as a moderately complex "family," all sharing one thing in common: they are solutions to the same equation. However, families can have more simple things in common as well. In this tutorial we will look at a few families and discuss how their "things in common" are manifested graphically. |
(From Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems,William E. Boyce and Richard C. DiPrima, 1992, p. 26). |
Same slope, different interceptsOn the left we see what happens when we take a linear "base equation" (in this case, the equation y = x), and increase its b-value, thus shifting its y-intercept. The result in the animation is that the line moves up the y-axis. Reversing the process then sends the line back to its original position. The animation, then, represents a family of parallel lines all sharing one thing in common: they have a slope of 1. (The size of the family? Infinite: we could keep increasing (or decreasing) the b-value for as long as we would like!) By changing the y-intercept - or, more generally, by changing any parameter of a curve - we come up with a family that is joined by a common characteristic but differentiated from each other in some other way. |
Same y-intercept, different slopesNow we take the base equation y = x + 1 and change its m-value, thus changing the slope while keeping the y-intercept constant. The result can again be seen in the animation: each line hits the y-axis in the same place (at (0,1)), but we get the appearance of a rotating line. This family, then, shares the "anchor" of the same y-intercept, but the lines then increase at different rates from there. By changing the curve's other parameter, we have created a family connected in a different way: they have a common point instead of a common slope. (The size of the family is still infinite; we could pick any m-value from to for our slope.) |
However, if we just allowed h and k to be anything, we would get a family of parabolas, all opening upward, with uniform width and vertices . . . anywhere. The resulting graph would be rather difficut to decipher, so let's restrict the h and k values by looking only at the parabola family whose vertices lie on the circle . The result is a family whose members seem to be rotating around the circle itself. (For an alternative interpretation of a parabola rotating around a circle, scroll down to the end of this page.)Is a circle an ellipse?We conclude our look at quadratics by comparing the graphs of the circle and the family of ellipses . By allowing the value of k to vary, we see from the graph below that you could argue that circles are members of the ellipse family, for setting the value of k = 1 in this case gives us the unit circle. |
As can be seen in the animation, the result is a family whose members increase significantly in their complexity: from the first approximation, y = 1, and in the second, to   in the last. The visual result is that the blue curves seem to "melt" into the red graph of the cosine function, coming closer and closer to convergence with it. |
This paraboloid can be generated by simply spinning the parabola around the z-axis. As shown on the right, when viewed from any angle, the paraboloid's 2-D cross-sections are parabolas. |
And, finally, we can create families that are related in more subtle ways than just using vertical shifts or rotations. Below we see several members of the family , noting that each change in the parameter k seems to "tilt" the paraboloid ever more.
After glancing at the Math 696 News page . . . we have re-interpreted the phrase "motion around a circle," and the result is on the right. Now we take a parabola with a = 1, h = 0, and k = 3, and rotate the whole thing around the circle . Now we have a family of parabolas whose equations are not even all of the form , thanks to the varying orientations of their axes of symmetry. |