~~ Click HERE to break out of someone else's frames! ~~

OIL DRILLING IN THE ANWR - Bush didn't tell the truth
Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!



The 2,000-acre ruse
Editorial in the Boulder Daily Camera
August 27, 2001

When dealing with big oil, one expects the rhetoric to be slick. But it's not just unctuous. It's fallacious.

Early this month, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil exploration. The vote was called a compromise, because oil and gas exploration would be confined to a mere 2,000 acres. The Coastal Plain of the wildlife refuge is 1.5 million acres. In that context, sacrificing 2,000 acres sounds like a trifle.

But that's exactly what the oil companies wanted. And it's no trifle. The 2,000-acre restriction is neither a compromise nor an accurate picture of drilling in ANWR. It is, however, indicative of the equivocation about this issue.

President Bush says the nation is plunging into an energy crisis. Energy consumption is expected to outpace domestic energy production. Such an imbalance, he says, requires that the nation increase its production of oil and other resources. Central to that strategy is drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

The so-called 1002 area of the refuge might contain between 3.6 billion and 10.4 billion barrels of oil. The United States burns about 7 billion barrels annually.

President Eisenhower established ANWR in 1960, and President Carter doubled its size in 1980. The coastal 1002 area, east of the Prudhoe Bay oil fields, is off limits to oil and gas exploration. It is the last 5 percent of the Alaskan coastal plain that is still closed to oil and gas development.

That might change. The House has voted to drill, but the Senate could reject the 2,000-acre ruse.

The bill that passed the House (and the one pending in the Senate) would require that the government lease no fewer than 200,000 acres of the refuge for oil exploration. That 2,000-acre restriction applies only to drilling rigs, and only to that portion of the equipment that touches the ground.

The 2,000 acres would not have to be - and would not be - contiguous. A modern drilling rig covers 10 acres. Do the math. It's not fuzzy.

This is no compromise. It's exactly what President Bush and the oil barons wanted.

Furthermore, that 2,000-acre restriction says nothing about the rest of the infrastructure used to pump oil out of the ground, across the tundra, and down to the lower 48. The House voted to allow the construction of 200 miles of roads and 200 miles of pipeline in the refuge.

Developing oil requires more than drilling rigs, roads and pipelines. There must also be barracks, power stations, maintenance sheds, storage facilities, sewage-treatment and water-extraction facilities. Ice roads, used in winter to move heavy equipment over tundra, consume about 1 million gallons per mile. This water is sucked from critical fish habitat. The U.S. Department of Interior estimates that 2,000 acres of drill rigs would spawn a maze of facilities spanning between 130,000 acres to 303,000 acres.

And how necessary is this oil? Writing in Foreign Affairs magazine this month, energy experts Amory and Hunter Lovins note that the coastal plain could yield an average of 292,000 barrels per day over 30 years. That would power only 2 percent of American cars and light trucks.

But that much oil could be saved if light vehicles became 0.4 miles per gallon more efficient. Today, American cars average 24 mpg, a 20-year low. Congressman Mark Udall, who represents Boulder, notes that raising the average to 40 mpg by 2010 would save 10 times as much oil as would likely be extracted from ANWR.

The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is one of the last genuinely wild places on Earth. The oil companies have shown no reason to despoil it. Their distortions only underscore the need to preserve it.

http://www.thedailycamera.com/opinion/editorials/27eedit.html

Back to Alerts
Alaska Alert page 1
Alaska Alert page 3

Created © 2001 KChapman
Images on this page created by the author
Copyright. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work posted within this site is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research, editorial and educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html ]
|Email|PAWPRINTS|Home|Wildlife Backgrounds|THE PREDATOR|