This is what I accept as proof that the Zap film is altered.

1. We have solid evidence that the back of the head was blasted out. Yet on film we only see clearly the front side blown out and not the back. Do I believe the film or do I believe what the the doctors saw. I believe what the doctors reported to see and not what the film shows. Emergency room doctors are very observant and well trained to spot things. Do I believe that they were all mistaken. No I don*t. Therefore my only conclusion is that the film is altered to hide the back wound. Now if this is true, we would expect to see something unusual at the back of the head. And we do! It has some very un-natural black tones in that area. Just after the head shot, it goes from a grey black to a solid jet black in 1/18th of a second. Does this indicate a natural occurrence on the film? No it doesn't.

2. The limo is moving along in the film, yet the head spray stays with Kennedy's head for several frames. This is impossible. If the limo moves forward, it has to leave the spray behind in the air as it moves forward. As Kennedy moves forward in the limo the spray still continues to hallow his head and follows Kennedy in the moving limo. There is only one possible explanation for this, the film is not showing natural laws so therefore is altered some how.

3. The spray looses most of it's mass in 1/18th of a second. I challenge anyone to replicate this with blood or water as a science project. It can not be done. Spray always lingers and hangs in the air for several whole seconds. Also with Kennedy there was more than just blood. With it was mass amounts of pulverised brain tissue which would make the spray's presence even stronger. Connally said he was hit by brain tissue the size of a thumb nail. In the Zap film there is no evidence in the spray of any such thing, The spray is clearly just fluid. The actions of the spray in the film can not be replicated in real life, so this strongly indicates that it is altered.

Was there a motive to hide the back wound? Could it have been done with 1963 technology? Yes.

Richard Vizzutti