Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
View Profile
« August 2005 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Blessings
Faith,& Religion
From a Father
Instructor or Pedant
Movies
Music
Random
Time
TV
You are not logged in. Log in
Snippets and Wisps - Ideas, Opinions and Musings of Steve Will
Monday, 22 August 2005
TV Musings
Now Playing: "Once Upon a Mattress" soundtrack
On the radio the other day, a few of the chat-jockeys were talking. One mentioned that Mandy Patinkin is coming back to TV.

"That's great!" said the other. "He's the best actor out there, in my opinion."

When informed that the show was going to be "yet another cop show" he was dismayed.

So, what is it about "cop shows?" These days, if it's a drama, it's a cop show or it's a medical show. Many of the most watched are a combination -- see "CSI" and its variants. And even the pure medical shows have been getting fewer and farther between. By the way, "cop show" is really an oversimplification for the genre, because the shows about lawyers throwing the bad guys behind bars are really the same thing.

So, if Mandy is getting back into TV, it's a pretty good bet he's doing a "cop show."

Why cop shows? Do we want to feel that there are people out there protecting us? Probably. The state of the entertainment and political world is the constant instillation of fear into the masses. Cop shows perpetuate that -- "Look at the crazy people there are in the world, Mildred!" -- and then tell us not to worry -- "Darn good thing we have Gil Grissom out there catching them, Arnold!"

Still, I think it's not quite so simple. We have a view that "drama" happens more in those high-stress professions -- doctors have to deal with emergency situations, policemen have to risk their lives to serve and protect -- those realities lend themselves well to drama.

My office doesn't really provide the setting for drama. Oh, sure, anyone could concoct a soap opera in just about any work environment. The thing is, it would be no more "true" than it would be in a police precinct, and we don't have crooks to chase here in software development.

I was thinking back on "thirtysomething" -- it was a a fine drama that took the normal life of married parents and extrapolated into situations which are closer to home. But to maintain interest, conflict had to be more constant than happens in normal life, and eventually, the show would have had to become a soap opera to keep going, I think. I think this sort of formula could work again, for a while.

So, enough musing on this topic for now. What do you think, dear reader?

Posted by mn/stevewill at 1:42 PM CDT
Post Comment | View Comments (1) | Permalink | Share This Post

Monday, 17 October 2005 - 6:29 PM CDT

Name: Mike Hacker

One of the downsides of medical and legal shows in particular, is that they tend to edit the real experience in TV time. For example, the time it takes for a patient to go into V-Fib and the time that it takes doctors to call a death can be up to a half an hour. On TV it's fifteen seconds at most. TV time is much different than real time. Same with lawsuits or criminal trials. Lawsuits take months and years to resolve, unlike David E. Kelley shows which always have 2 or 3 resolving in a Television hour, which is about 43-48 minutes. Criminal trials, although a lot shorter, can take a week to hear. Yet on TV they resolve within an hour, too. So this skewing of time is having an effect on the mythos of these professions.

Likewise with forensic shows. These had a direct bearing on the criminal jury I sat on. There was no physical evidence in the case. It was simply he-said/she-said. Testimony is evidence! You don't have to have a smoking gun to convict. Yet, the jurors felt that was a serious omission. It didn't manufacture reasonable doubt, but those jurors needed a lot of convincing by the group that was satisfied that the defendant was guilty.

But I do like your thesis that politics and entertainment attempt to instill fear in their audience. Entertainment though, has a tendency to wrap it up--in politics, you have to wrap it up in the voting booth. But they use psychologically similar tactics.

View Latest Entries