Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

Program on Gay Awareness

Written and Developed by Chuck Marshall
With assistance from Sammy McGee, and Suzyn Smith
St. Andrews College

The purpose of the involvement is to get the participants to examine their comfort level and gut reactions to gay situations and the gay community. The program is directed at both gays and straights. Everyone must understand that the goal is best accomplished by honest reactions and responses and also that no one will be judged on their response.

The process is that the questions are distributed by drawing them from a hat. There should be one question for each slip of paper. Once everyone has received their question, people will begin reading their question either on a volunteer basis or by a system, or both. The person will read his or her question and then give a candid response and elaborate as much as possible. Then, other people will continue the discussion by asking questions or by sharing their response. Sponsors of the program should act to facilitate discussion.

A list of suggested questions follow.

How it went

by Suzyn Smith
We served snacks (gazpacho, quesadillas, hummus and fresh baked cookies, none o’ that store bought stuff for us!) For the first twenty minutes or so, everyone ate snacks and talked, chiefly complaining about the weather.

After a while, we asked everyone to sit down and passed out the questions on little slips of paper. We asked someone to read the question on their peice of paper, and then everyone discussed it.

The program got started with “If you were present at an informal gathering of friends and someone began making anti-gay slurs and comments, what would you do? Would you react differently if they were strangers? If so how?” Since this was a situation that nearly everyone has faced at some time or another, it was a good ice breaker and got everyone talking. Almost everyone said that they would confront the person although some people were more worried about confronting strangers.

Of the questions asked, the one that got the most debate was “If you were heterosexual and your roomate was heterosexual, would you want to know?” This brought on arguement as the group was divided as to whether one’s sexuality was only a small part of who one was, or whether knowing one’s sexuality is an important part of being involved in one’s life.

Thirty-nine people showed up, including three professors, and almost everyone talked at some point or another, so we only got through eight questions. That seemed like enough as we didn’t want to program to run too much over an hour. The briefness of the program was another good aspect. Since we ended it before it had started to drag, everyone was still having a good time. One of the professors said that it was one of the best programs he’d attended on campus ever and the students seemed to enjoy it, too.

Back to Past Activities Back to Programs