Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

Pre-history - the 1995 consent decree


95-Apr: Appeals court ruling

The DOJ and states vs. Microsoft


Washington Post: Timeline
MONOPOLIES AND COMBINATIONS IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE
HP and the boot sequence issue

The Economist: The Microsoft Case


CNet: Text of state suit


CNet: Text of DOJ action


US Doj: DOJ case against Microsoft
CNet: Trial headlines
Wired: Timeline
National Association of Attorneys General: Microsoft documents
Sullivan & Cromwell
NY Times: Short Profiles of Major Players in Microsoft Case
Microsoft Monopoly, Antitrust, Natural Monopoly, Predatory Pricing - Microsoft s Modus Operandi


98-Aug CNet: Bill Gates deposed
98-Nov CNet: David Boies' faces campaign finance charges
98-Dec CNet: Edward Felton deconstructs IE bundling
98-Dec CNet: Intuit gets into it
99-Jan CNet: Schmalansee takes the stand
99-Jan CNet: AOL/Netscape and Sun
99-Feb CNet: Browser tactics revealed
99-Feb CNet: The bogus video

James Allchin conceded under cross-examination that a videotaped recreation of an experiment he conducted does not depict the same test he ran to show that Microsoft's Windows 98 operating system is impaired when its Internet browsing software is disabled.


99-Nov: Findings of Fact, full text


99-Nov CNet: Judge sides with DOJ against Microsoft
99-Nov ZDNet: Microsoft-DOJ Special Report
99-Nov TMF: Antitrust 101 more
99-Nov TMF: Portrait Of Microsoft: Threats, Profits And Power
99-Nov Slashdot: Slashdot's "Instant" Legal Analysis of the MS Ruling
99-Nov Intellectual Capital: interviews Robert Bork
99-Nov The Economist: Now Bust Microsoft's trust
99-Nov Smart Money: 10 Things Bill Gates Can Do to Get the Justice Department Off His Back
99-Nov NY Times: Microsoft in Judge Judy's court
99-Nov The Nation: Microsoft's Fatal Error
99-Nov EE Times: Unlock Windows
99-Nov IT Director: Microsoft Faces a Wave of Litigation
99-Nov New York: The Jihad Defense
99-Nov Slashdot: Antitrust Experts Respond re MS
99-Nov CNN: Judge appoints mediator (Posner)
99-Dec CNet: DOJ, states claim Microsoft violated Sherman Act
99-Dec CNet: Government proposal leaves room for Microsoft counter
99-Dec Reason: High-Tech's Starr Report - by Virginia Postrel
00-Jan CNet: Microsoft scoffs at government findings
00-Jan Wired: Is Microsoft Conceding Defeat?
00-Jan SiliconValley.com: Conservative think tank urges Microsoft breakup
00-Jan CNet: Group disputes findings in Microsoft trial (ACT)
00-Feb ZDNet: SIAA sides with DOJ ...SIAA amicus text
00-Feb Lessig's amicus
00-Feb ZDNet: Microsoft takes one on the chin (Lessig brief)
00-Feb TMF: djalston cries unfair, ericb888 corrects the record
00-Feb Wired: Fear and Trembling in Silicon Valley
00-Feb MSNBC: Judge blunts Microsoft defense
00-Mar Cringely: Judge Jackson is Sending the Wrong Signals


00-Apr: Conclusions of Law and Order, full text


00-Apr TMF: Microsoft: The Emotion of the Case
00-Apr ZDNet: Rivals claim fault on MS server tactics
00-Apr ZDNet: Microsoft antitrust insurer tries to weasel out
00-Apr CNet: Economists recommend four-way split for Microsoft
00-Apr Computerworld: Users, experts split on effect of a Microsoft breakup
00-Apr DOJ: PLAINTIFFS' PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT
00-Apr Seattle Times: Kodak, Intel rulings could aid Microsoft
00-May ZDNet: New evidence triggered DOJ action
00-May TMF: Those dirty rats ("no moral core")
00-May The Register: Wall Street's finest lose plot in support of DoJ case
00-May Washington Post: Microsoft Drafts Reply to Antitrust Proposal
00-May CNN: DOJ: MSFT tricks not new
00-May Microsoft: Microsoft Urges Court to Dismiss Government's Breakup Proposal Immediately
00-May CNN: Justice Department calls Microsoft proposal 'ineffective'
00-May ZDNet: Peter Coffee on the counterproposal and "Chinese Wall" reversal
00-May CNet: DOJ responds to Microsoft proposal
00-May Computerworld: Users might eye Linux if Office were ported to OS
00-May CNN: Microsoft renews attack
00-May CNet: DOJ attorneys reveal Gates' emails
00-May CNet: Judgment day nears in Microsoft antitrust trial (final proposal)
00-May Microwoft: Last minute offer of proof
00-Jun SV: Microsoft takes final shot at breakup proposal
00-Jun ZDNet: Critics warn of MS chain reaction
00-Jun Business Week: A Way for Conservative Judges to Act against Microsoft

00-Jun: Memorandum and order


00-Jun: Final Judgement

The appeal and aftermath


Consumer antitrust suits


99-Nov CBS: Seastrom
99-Nov: Reed Elsevier
LA Times: Orange County consumer suit
99-Nov: Ohio suit
00-Jun ZDNet: Oregon judge throws out Windows 98 pricing suit
00-Jun CNet: Nevada judge rejects Windows 98 pricing suit
00-Jul ZDNet: MS v. Consumers: The Other Lawsuits
00-Jul ZDNet: Court Tosses Private Antitrust Suit Against Microsoft
00-Jul InfoWorld: German court says OK to unbundling
00-Aug CNet: Microsoft asks judge to dismiss 62 antitrust suits
00-Aug CNet: Microsoft ditches two more private lawsuits
00-Aug CNet: California judge allows Microsoft suit to proceed


Other investigations and antitrust suits


European Union antitrust action
00-Apr CNet: Judges consolidate 27 Microsoft antitrust suits
00-Apr ZDNet: DOJ to ask for breakup

01-Feb CNet: Microsoft draws fire for Corel investment
04-Apr The Economist: Desperate embrace
How heart-warming. But what, exactly, has happened? In short, the two enemies have agreed to bury the hatchet. Microsoft will pay Sun almost $2 billion to settle Sun's pending antitrust lawsuit against it, to resolve patent issues and to pay in advance for some licensing royalties. For Microsoft, which has some $53 billion in cash, this is peanuts. For Sun, whose credit rating was cut to junk last month by Standard & Poor's, it is most welcome. Longer term, the two firms have agreed to make their technologies compatible and, more generally, to play nice.