New security camera can 'see' through clothes
Story
Highlights:
1. New
camera can 'see' through clothing and detect what's underneath
2. Makers
say camera does not show detail 'people might be concerned about'
3. Camera
can scan large crowds from distance of up to 25 meters
The
camera can see through people's clothes from up to 25 meters away, detecting
objects.
The
ThruVision T5000 camera picks up Terahertz rays, or
T-rays, which are naturally emitted by all objects and can pass through fabric
or even walls.
The
camera can then image metallic and non-metallic objects hidden under clothing
on still or moving subjects without revealing any body detail, according to its
British manufacturer, ThruVision Limited.
While
similar technology is being unveiled at airports around the world, the T5000 is
designed to be used in large, open areas. With a range of 25 meters, the T5000
can screen people in public places, thus avoiding bottlenecks at border
crossings or security checkpoints.
It
also means people can be screened without knowing it.
Amid
privacy concerns, ThruVision Chief Executive Clive
Beattie said the image produced by the camera did not reveal detailed anatomy.
"It's
almost a glowing light bulb," Beattie told CNN. "You don't see the
detail that people might be concerned about."
Explosives,
liquids, narcotics, weapons, plastics, and ceramics can all be detected by the
camera's imaging technology, which the company says is completely safe. Unlike
X-rays, the T5000 does not emit radiation -- it only picks up on it. Watch the camera in action »
The
technology stems from British astronomers' work in studying dying stars.
Astronomers use T-ray cameras to see through dust and clouds in space.
The
company sees uses for its camera at high-profile sites like political or
business venues, and outdoor areas like tourist attractions and sports arenas.
The
camera is already in use in
In
Some
said the camera was going too far and invading privacy, but others said they
are willing to put safety before privacy concerns.
"There's
surveillance everywhere anyway," said one commuter. "I don't think
it's much of difference. I don't care that they can see through me, because
they can see me anyway."
Some
experts said the intrusion of the camera was not worth the benefit.
"What
we should consider is how much we want to lose aspects of our privacy in order
to attain a sort of notional security," said David Murakami Wood, director
of the Surveillance Studies Network, which deals with surveillance and privacy
issues. "In most cases this isn't real security -- it's a sense of safety
that has very little real effect." E-mail to a friend
[END]