Part I: Motives for Mind Control
Allen Barker,
This essay is the first in a series of three on mind control. It
discusses some of the motives for mind control and why it continues. Part
II of the series, "Resisting the
For the purposes of this essay, mind control refers to any method used nonconsensually on a victim to covertly and deniably
attempt to control or modify that person's behavior. This occurs in
settings where a person has a reasonable expectation not to be violated, such
as in his or her home or in his or her private mentation.
It is this sort of violation that differentiates a mind control crime from an
ordinary social interaction, just as the lack of consent turns sex into rape.
Consider "street theater" as an example. Street theater
refers to a form of harassment where a group of torturers act out little skits,
either literally on the street or on the internet, in the media, etc., intended
to harass and disturb an individual or to otherwise modify the victim's
behavior. So if a group of people act out "street theater" to a
random person to disturb him or her then, while this might be a crime, I would
not necessarily call it mind control. It is when surveillance is combined
with the "skits" to both track a person over
time for harassment and to obtain personal information about a person to be
used in the harassment that I would say a mind control operation is being
carried out.
Of course there are many sorts of mind control operations, but they all
tend to have this sort of feedback setup: violate a person with extreme
surveillance and use that surveillance information to target the
influencing. It is a classic sort of feedback setup that might be
described in terms of the mathematical and engineering fields of control
theory, at least in the abstract sense. The surveillance devices can
range from phone taps, audio and video bugs in a home or car, internet
monitoring, and basic tracking devices, all the way up to advanced satellite
surveillance methods, super-sensitive electromagnetic sensor systems with
computer analysis, and devices implanted in people's bodies without their
consent. The "effector" or the
control variables can range from harassing phone calls, street theater, rumor
spreading, power-line dimming, and internet messages all the way up to
harassment with microwave devices, acoustic weapons, messages in the media such
as TV and newspapers, projecting "voices" to a person that only he or
she can hear, and direct brain stimulation and manipulation.
Other mind control methods use techniques such as hypnosis and drugs to
influence people, but the methods all have the common thread of the denied and
deniable attack against the mind of an individual. The purpose of this
essay is not to specifically describe the methods of mind control. More
specifics will be given in the later essays of this series, and one can consult
books and articles by various authors for the documented history of mind
control technology and operations in the
Even if you do not believe that all of this is currently happening --
though it is -- you should still be concerned. Based on public, open
sources it is clear to almost anyone that the technology will be available in
the near future. But there are victims now. You do not even have to
think the
For the purposes of this essay, I assume that the reader has a general
grasp of the type of mind control manipulations being discussed and I consider
possible motivations a harasser, monitor, or controller (or group thereof)
might have to commit such vicious crimes. Because this essay is intended
to get people thinking, the possible motives will not necessarily be linked to
any particular technological method, but the reader with some common sense will
see what methods might be used in each case and will no doubt be able to think
of combinations and motivations not directly mentioned here.
To spoil the rest of the essay, the reasons boil down to money and power.
Technological Equivalent of the
Atomic Bomb
Many items appear on the list of motivations for mind control abuses, but
the one primary reason why the technology was developed is because it is a
weapon. This is the first motivation and why billions of dollars have
been covertly spent on the technology. Of course, once the technology and
techniques are developed they tend to proliferate. Other application tend
to be found, depending on the level of corruption in a society, and organized
crime groups other than the government tend to obtain such weapons and
techniques. But the primary reason such devices were first developed and
tested is that governments were and are developing and testing weapons.
A recent Air Force Times article about a microwave crowd control weapon
being prepared for deployment described such weapons as "perhaps the
biggest breakthrough in weapons technology since the atomic bomb," and the
particular weapon they were describing is far, far from the covert cutting
edge. Indeed, a government would be negligent if it did not investigate
such technology. But using the technology on people without their
consent, either in testing or in applications, is either an act of war if
committed on foreign individuals or an act of treason if committed on domestic
citizens. It is almost always an act of torture.
It is important not to confuse the real motivation with the
rationalizations or the cover reasons. Terrorists, terrorists,
terrorists, and pedophiles are the currently popular rationalizations for
usurping citizens' inalienable liberties now that the cold war is over. A
week of American TV would convince any unindoctrinated
viewer of that. There is also the phenomenon I call "spreading the
blood around." This is the idea that the more people who can be made
to take part in some way in a large-scale atrocity -- to get some of the blood
on their hands -- the more political support that can be generated for
continuing the atrocities.
Some differences between the atomic bomb and mind control technology need
to be pointed out. First, mind control technology is meant to be used
covertly and deniably. It is not meant necessarily to kill, though it
can, but rather to ultimately control a human being like an automaton.
Secondly, mind control technology is designed for use against the domestic
population, rather than just against foreign targets.
Who Would Want to Rule the World?
At some level it is stunning that an essay such as this is necessary at
all. People have always wanted to "control men's minds" -- not
to mention women's minds. But people historically have also been
manipulated again and again, by one group of people followed by another, by one
big lie followed by another -- often convinced that it cannot possibly be
happening now. There is also a "moral big lie" where decent
people cannot imagine that anyone could have the capacity to carry out such
heinous atrocities and conspiracies over long periods of time, because they
could not imagine themselves doing it. They have minor moral lapses like
everyone (like ordinary people tell small lies) but they just cannot grasp the
notion of the big moral atrocity because they would never consider such
abominations.
There always have been and always will be people among us who yearn for
nothing but to be tyrants over other people. Let us be clear here on that
point and never forget it. There will always be someone who wants to be
the next Stalin -- to choose one historical example from countlessly
many -- and who will stop at absolutely nothing to achieve this. This
also means that there are Americans among us now who are just this sort of
person -- or a lackey for such a person -- living among us in our
society. Do not let the big lie and ubiquitous American propaganda fuzzy
your thinking. The threat is more likely to come from within the
government than from someone's garage. Eternal vigilance is indeed the
price of liberty.
Motives for Mind Control
We finally come to the list of possible motivations for mind
control. It is important to remember, though, that it is not the
responsibility of the torture victim to second-guess the reasons the torture
was committed. In this sense the "reason" for the torture is
generally that the torturer had the opportunity to commit the torture and
thought he or she could get away with it. Nonetheless, it is useful to
examine more mercenary or mercantile sorts of possible motivations to better
see why mind control torture is happening, why it continues, and maybe gain
some insight into how it can be abolished.
Remember that in any group of people there is politics. This is
also the case with the people involved in the conspiracy of mind
controllers. So when considering questions such as "why don't they
just kill everyone who speaks out at all" or other such questions -- which
can be useful to consider even if you cannot know the exact answer -- it is
important to keep this in mind. Mind control conspirators tend to come
from the same culture and live in the same society with the victims. When
they leave the underground bunker -- literally or metaphorically -- they go to
live in homes and with families among us. [The low-level mind
controllers, like
Many interrelated motives are mentioned on the following list, but that
does not imply that exactly one listed motive is the true motive in any case,
or that the list is exhaustive. A useful comparison for how a victim
might be used is a comparison to a slaughterhouse, where an animal comes in and
is cut up and almost every usable scrap that can be used for anything is
used. To use a slave auction analogy, if one slaver has a slave that is
good for X but needs Y, and another slaver has a slave that is good for Y and
wants X, then perhaps they can strike up a commercial transaction on their
human chattel.
Some might object that publicizing this list will only give new ideas to
harassers. It might, but the only alternative is to keep the people
uninformed and to allow the atrocities to continue. I also suspect that
the people with access to this technology for some years have already thought
of (and applied) all of these reasons, even if they did not express them this
way.
Here is the list of motives, in no particular order.
Low-intensity warfare against the domestic population.
This has long been the policy of the
Ideas to mine/steal. In some sense
this is just a form of old-fashioned spying updated with new technology that
obliterates the notion of human rights. Consider what might be the first
step on a slippery slope of rationalizations. Suppose an Iraqi nuclear
scientist, or any brilliant "foreign" scientist or engineer, was of
concern to the
Would such a program, if "successful," be contained and only be
used on foreign scientists? I do not think so. It would be used on
any people at all, only limited by the cost and the perceived risk of being
caught. Domestic targets might even be more tempting because the risk of
discovery could be better "managed." You would not even have to
be a brilliant scientist, some bureaucrat only needs to think you are, or that
you are somehow "of interest." If enough people are targeted
then almost all levels of scientists and engineers could be targeted. (If
they had a golden goose they'd dissect it.)
Intellectual property theft from scientists and engineers is only listed
first because of the slippery slope example above; there are many classes of
people who might be targeted for similar reasons. Einstein is quoted as
having said that imagination is more important than intelligence,
and imagination is even more important to covert organizations who effectively
select against employees with real imagination.
Other sorts of creative people who might be vulnerable are writers
(plagiarism), other types of artists or craftspeople, inventors, programmers,
etc. In an economic espionage sense, any sort of innovative or
high-volume stock trader or business leader might be a tempting and very
lucrative target. Dialogue and situations stolen from people's real lives
can become tomorrow's "drama." Patents, copyrights, trademarks,
and any sort of intellectual property can be deniably stolen from these
victims. This can deny them their livelihoods and makes them literal
slaves.
Statistical profiling of a population.
This is like using nonconsensual subjects in a focus group, to understand what
their likes, dislikes, needs, and trends are. It might be most effective
with unwitting subjects (who have not realized they are under monitoring), but
can still be used on subjects who know they are being monitored. It is
like having the ability to take an instant poll of a captive population, who
may not even be able to hide what their innermost secrets are. Anyone who
knows anything about modern
Suppose, for example, that an individual were put under surveillance and
found useful to serve as an exemplar of a statistical demographic group, say of
100,000 people. That is, that person's perspective, ideas, and reactions
could be used to both predict and manipulate the entire social group on a large
scale. This sort of analysis is already known to take place; it becomes
that much more effective with a focus group under even more invasive
monitoring. In a commercial sense, the power to manipulate a demographic
group is the power to get them to purchase goods and provide a profit.
Every sort of thing is marketed these days. Advertising campaigns are
created to sell politicians, soap, ideas, slurs, and anything else.
Interrogation for secrets. This is
another advanced technology application to old-fashioned spying. People
can be "brain interrogated" for secrets they know. This may be
used to reveal critical passwords, uncover blackmailable
incidents, and obtain national and commercial secrets.
Psyop BDA. BDA is the military
abbreviation for bomb damage assessment. In order to most effectively
bomb a target you need to know which bombs hit their target and how much damage
was inflicted by the bombing. This feedback is then used to both improve
the subsequent bombings and to revisit targets that were missed. One of Noam Chomsky's main theses has for years been that
"democratic" governments use propaganda similarly to the way direct
totalitarian governments use violence. Therefore, it is important for the
cloistered elites to know how well their propaganda "bombs" are
playing with the masses. Like with the statistical profiling use of
"maximally invasive surveillance," nonconsensual monitoring can
provide this sort of political control feedback data.
Entertainment freak show. Sadism and voyeurism are powerful
motivations for some people. Mind control victims can provide a live
torture-cam of an individual 24 hours a day, and may even allow the sadist to
play at the controls and inflict damage or influence the
"show." It would be like an ongoing snuff film you could
participate in. This may also be a part of "spreading the blood
around" by appealing to some of the baser human instincts and then having
a person on the hook for having participated (like has been alleged for some
"satanic" rituals where people take a small part in a ritual crime so
they are inextricably linked to the conspiracy).
To suppress technology they cannot control. Many people believe
that you can always be the best if you can harass and put down anyone
better. This seems to be the modus operandi of the
Hired harassment squad for billionaires.
It does not take long for some personnel involved in this technology and
experienced with these techniques to leave for the
private sector. This opens the possibility for deniable mercenary
harassment squads.
Distributed concentration camps. The
federal government has historically made plans for "emergencies"
which have included lists of people to lock up in internment camps. With
this new technology perfected, the concentration camps can be
"distributed," by turning each listed person's home and mind into an
electronic prison.
Vigilante groups. To control
"crime," or whatever they choose to claim they are targeting people
for, a vigilante group can select people they do not like for extrajudicial
punishment. Like most such groups, actually "controlling crime"
is just an excuse to pick people for victimization and to rationalize it to the
members of the group.
To control a person, like a world leader or assassin (or any sort of
leader). This is probably the ultimate dream of a mind controller (or
their own controllers): to take control of a world leader or other important
person. This could even start from a young age, with the person groomed
for the position of power and with members of the secret team influencing and
increasing the opportunities for the chosen "asset" to reach a
position of power. When trained from a young age an unfortunate child
might not even realize that the influencing was not normal (the "secret
friend" that is not imaginary). Subtle advanced techniques could
influence an adult without his or her knowledge. Even if he or she
suspected, there would likely already be a pool of blackmail information and
powerful psychological levers to employ against the person.
The quest for controlled assassins, or Manchurian candidates, is
well-known. The search for such techniques never stopped and is still
ongoing. Similarly, sexual blackmail operations are an ongoing reality
and mind control victims may be utilized in setting up such traps.
If the technology is cheap enough or if you have a wide-field
multi-target device you do not even need to target the leaders. Your army
can covertly "capture" more and more of the inhabitants (or flick a
switch on a wide-field device) until it can march into town down main street to a hero's welcome. Then again, once this
is accomplished there is no need to march in at all, just keep milking out
"tribute" from the conquered people -- who never even knew there was
a war against them. It is easy to parody this as just some sort of
"body snatchers" scenario, but to military planners it is a very real
thing.
To infiltrate a group. In order to
control, influence, or install a puppet leader in a group the controllers do
not know much about and really do not understand, it could be useful to monitor
a member or leader in order to learn what might be effective responses, ideas,
or actions. For example, a religious sect they wanted to control.
Another example would be for a mind controller to use information gained from
the monitoring of a victim in order to better pose as a victim, say on the
internet.
Genocide. This could be the
implicit or explicit result of a mind control operation. The group here
is whatever group is selected for torture, which may be racial, religious,
socioeconomic, or related to whatever other selection criteria is used.
People under long-running extrajudicial torture are not free to just
"choose life" even if they wanted to. People are forced to
decide whether they should bring a child into the world to also be monitored
and violated every day, without the child's or the parent's consent. They
have to wonder about supporting a child when they are under ongoing torture
which may intensify at any moment. They know that, at the least, the life
of any child will be threatened in order to further torture them and harass
them, and they know that the threat is credible.
As a medical scam for money. These days medicine and pharmaceuticals represent big money.
If the cover lie for mind control abuses is mental illness them some mind
control victims will be misdiagnosed as mentally ill (rather than as torture
victims) and given (or even forced) treatment and medication. An
unscrupulous company or group of individuals could exploit this fact to make money
off the suffering of the mind control victims.
To predict and preempt actions. Besides
wanting to just control behavior, a running trend is to want to predict behavior,
obviously before it happens. But the sort of data that is needed to
predict behavior in detail is exactly the same as the invasive surveillance
data used to control and harass individuals. Prediction is also a
component in more effective control.
We are already seeing instances where people's rights are infringed upon
not because they have done anything but because someone predicted they would do
something, based upon whatever methodology. Much of this prediction is
just snake oil and pseudoscience, but that does not change the fact that the
rights infringement is very real. There is also a statistical and
scientific methodology to prediction which undoubtedly will improve with
time. If you can accurately predict someone's actions you can move to
preempt those actions even before they are taken.
To train agents to perform any of these actions.
As professional torturing scum either retire, move
into other sectors, or quit in disgust, new agents must be hired to take their
places. If the system is expanding then new people need to be hired to
enlarge the system (or to automate the system with computers so fewer monitors
can control more and more people). These people need to be trained in the
special juvenile and idiotic barbarity the
To intimidate a population by making
"examples" of people. If it were an open secret that
people can be selected for any reason for mind control torture, then the
population in on the open secret would be intimidated, if not terrified, that
any one of them could be the next victim. This is just a new method of
violence by which a regime of thugs can control a population using a
long-practiced terror tactic.
To perfect the technology and techniques and make it
less detectable. This is the human guinea pig testing of the
weapons technology, much like radiation tests on unwitting citizens.
Weapons are built, human subjects are chosen from the population, and the
weapons are tested on the nonconsensual subjects. (Some consensual
subjects are no doubt also used, but that is not a human rights violation if
the consent was truly informed.) After these tests, the weapons lab
analyzes the terrorized or influenced or manipulated responses of the subjects
(in a "successful" test) and refines the weapon system.
A part of this testing also serves to help close all avenues of response
and redress which might be open to the human subjects (and which later domestic
targets of the weapon might have). Any response the victim tries to make
is monitored, and if it might be successful then this "loophole" in
the system of denying justice is closed. For example, a lawyer might be
used to attempt to see what legal strategies he or she might think of so they
could be rendered ineffective. A technical person would be observed as he
or she tried to understand, measure, and block the effects of the weapons
system. This would be valuable feedback to the designers, and might even
provide them with ideas. Note that for this particular aspect of the
torture it is important that the victim know he or she is being attacked/violated.
Of course a victim has little choice but to try to resist or else to
willingly become a slave (which still would not likely stop the
harassment). He or she must constantly think about the
"testing" because it is typically ongoing, day and night. That
is just the vicious catch 22 that victims must deal with and is a part of why
it is torture. I am not trying to discourage any victim from taking
whatever action they decide is the best course in such a horrible situation.
Various unwitting spy scenarios. Perhaps
the best spy is one who does not even know he or she is a spy. He or she
cannot reveal it even under the most extreme torture because he or she does not
know it. Such people can be infiltrated into any group or just selected
out of any particular group and "wired up." In a domestic
social sense, inmates in prisons can be wired up before they are released so
their monitors can peep into any criminal underworld activity which they might enter
into after being "freed." (Of course it is important not to
confuse the secret police with the regular police and law enforcement, though
there is certainly overlap.)
To steal negotiating strategies or information.
Arms control, treaties, business negotiations.
To conceal scientific and philosophical insights into
human existence. One of the things repressive societies
fear is new ideas and new ways of thinking. Scientific advances have been
made which could revolutionize the ways man views himself (to use the masculine
form); but for some people this represents a potential threat to their
power. The new technologies could also potentially help our aging relatives,
for example, if used in a humane and consensual way. But it is a
difficult philosophical shift to acknowledge that now our own
"silent" thoughts might not be private -- or might not really be our
own. This is one of the difficulties in getting people to understand mind
control crimes. (Remember also that mind controllers have no compunction
or restriction against using any lies or deceptions or defiling and desecrating
any religion in an attempt to manipulate people.)
Human guinea pigs for medical or psychological
research. Once people are under ongoing, invasive
surveillance they can become guinea pigs for any sort of medical or
psychological human testing that needs continued monitoring. This is a
lucrative business now. For example, if a person were were
"knocked out" one day by whatever method and had a patch of skin
rubbed with some chemical under development or of concern then the
experimenters could watch the person's own response to the potential
poisoning. Psychological research has even larger potential for
abuse. Real "field testing."
To maintain the ongoing mind control conspiracy.
Because atrocities have been committed, atrocities continue to be committed to
conceal them. The mind control technology and harassment network is used
to keep the secret system secret, punish whistleblowers, and of course increase
profits at whatever cost to human dignity.
Conclusions
Given that there is a long list of possible motives, hundreds of people
(at the least) claiming to be victims of exactly this sort of technology, the
known development of the technology, a history of such abuses, and the
continued coverups of acknowledged MKULTRA and other
mind control victims in the population, it seems reasonable to conclude that
nonconsensual testing and harassment is still going on with the latest
technology. The questions are, who are the victims, how many are there,
what was and is being done to them, and how can this extrajudicial torture of
the domestic population be stopped as soon as possible.
[This
was a draft of an essay I wrote in 1999. After ``putting it in the
drawer'' for two years I have pulled it back out and decided to make it public
as Part II of this series. I have made a few minor modifications. Not
only do I still agree with it, I also do not think I can improve on it much
right now except for some final editing.
By Allen Barker,
Part II:
Resisting the
This essay is a compilation of thoughts on methods to resist
governmentally and societally supported mind control
torture, repression, and exploitation. It is part II of a series of
three, and deals only with social and political issues. Part I, “Motives
for Mind Control.” describes some of the motives for mind control and why it
continues. Part III of the series,
“ Mental Firewalls” deals with the techniques and methods that survivors
of this torture have developed to resist having their very mentation
tampered with, their bodies and lives violated, and their minds turned into
battlefields.
The purpose of this essay is not to try to convince anyone of what is
truly going on, but rather to analyze the situation and consider what can be
done about it (after you know well enough what is going on and are willing to
act as if you know it). I have talked to a good number of mind control
victims over the past few years, and many ask me what we can do about the
situation. That has been a difficult question. There are many possible
actions to take, but ineffective actions only waste time. It is a
complicated and disgusting situation in the
A Brief Description of Mind Control Torture
First, I should explain what I mean by mind control. Some so-called
``rebuttals'' of explanations of mind control harassment and technology focus
on narrow semantic interpretations of the term, for example by setting up the
straw man that any mind control technology must be able to completely control
someone's mind. I am using the term in the more general sense that is now
the common usage. By mind control I am referring to covert attempts to influence
the thoughts and behavior of human beings against their will (or without their
knowledge), particularly when surveillance of an individual is used as an
integral part of such influencing. I am especially dealing with situations
where individuals are singled out for campaigns of influencing and harassment
using advanced technology. I am not referring to such things as everyday
TV commercials trying to convince you that you need the latest shampoo --
unless the commercials are being used in a way deeper than this surface level
such as with the inclusion of subliminals and
triggers. (For more details and descriptions, see for example the Mind
Control: Technology, Techniques, and Politics web site at
http://www.datafilter.com/mc.)
The technology is rooted in surveillance devices, such as audio and video
bugs, through-the-wall and remote sensing devices, and biosensors both remote
and implanted. This provides the feedback for the influencing, as well as
any ``entertainment'' value for voyeur/sadists and intellectual property theft
for thieves. Coupled with the surveillance is some sort of ``effector'' or feedback path for influencing an
individual. This may be as simple as spreading rumors and gossip based on
the surveillance. It may include acting out ``street theater'' to the
individual, letting them know they are under surveillance and putting them in
bizarre situations to see what they do or to cause trauma and
disorientation. This may even include spreading the information for use
by ``assets'' in the newspaper, television, radio, and advertising businesses
and on the internet. In some individuals hypnosis may have been used to
condition certain reactions and behavior to be triggered by later cues.
The use of technology ranges from using harassing phone calls coupled with
surveillance-based feedback to provide aversive stimuli in a person's home, to
abusing the media and the internet as a means for harassment, to the use of
pulsed microwave beams to cause pain, anxiety, or heart palpitations, to the
use of brain implants to record and affect the brain directly, to...
Thus there are several categories of mind control operations, for example
covert druggings, hypnosis and trauma conditioning,
one-shot EM-type brain blasting, short-term mind fucks, and ongoing feedback
control setups for long-term torture and exploitation of victims, to mention a
few. What they have in common is the attack against the mind of the
victim, as well as the deniable and denied nature of the attack. The
exact means being used in any particular case are beside the point here.
These techniques do not just violate one or two of what everyone knows are fundamental human rights: In one fell swoop they
violate almost every fundamental human right a person has.
Standing Up and Resisting
I am sure that most if not all of the strategies I will discuss in this
essay have occurred to people involved in the area of mind control for any
length of time. I hope this essay will prove useful by collecting these various
ideas together and providing a big-picture overview of some possibilities. I
have tried to cover the whole range of possible actions, including violent
action. I know the torturers and their apologists may take this as some sort of
propaganda coup, and that these state-sponsored terrorists may go around
shouting ``terrorist,'' but the list would not be complete if I did not include
those possibilities. Thinking about all the possible reactions can yield
insights into seemingly unrelated matters.
Some people's response to ideas for action is to criticize the person
putting forth the ideas. Remarks like, ``what have you done,'' ``why didn't you
do this or that,'' and ``what is your hidden agenda'' are to be expected,
indirectly if not directly. I am confident enough about my efforts over the
past years to expose and stop these human rights violations to not let that
bother me -- whether or not someone else might agree with my approaches.
Developing a thick skin against smears and dirty tricks is necessary in
American politics in general these days, and especially when trying to expose
horrible atrocities carried out by well-funded and secretive groups.
Everyone has his or her own skills, abilities, and situation, and knows if he
or she is making his or her best effort in the circumstances.
I am coming out and saying a lot here, and I have given it a lot of
consideration. Some people might argue that incremental progress is the
way to present things, to preserve some notion of ``credibility.'' To me,
preserving ``credibility'' means to point out what I know is the case after I
know quite well it is the case. There have been denials every step of the
way, even of technology that definitely exists like microwave voice projection
and implanted tracking devices. Does that not impugn the ``credibility''
of the deniers, or the professional liars who are known to have tortured
American citizens for decades? Why should anyone think that such programs
of torture ever stopped? They have not.
The signers of the Declaration of
I have already been subjected to torture-level extrajudicial surveillance
and harassment by ``my fellow Americans,'' inside my own home and mind, for the
past four [now six] years. This has sharpened my awareness in some ways, and
I have seen quite directly how this stinking society and culture operate.
So I know something about how these pathetic, juvenile and barbaric rapists
work -- though it is difficult to imagine and it would make you feel sorry for
them if it weren't for their many victims. So yes, I will write it.
I will stake my credibility, career, family, and life on it because I know damn
well it is true and there is no real alternative but slavery.
(Why didn't the colonists ``prove'' in a corrupt and controlled court
that the soldiers of King George III oppressed the citizens of the colonies?)
The Actual Situation
This is a very brief rundown of the current situation in the
The
There still are many decent people in the
Great masses of people are not knowingly touched by this repressive
system because they do not need to be: They are kept ``blissfully
ignorant'' (or pretend it out of expedience). They think they are living
in the phony nation the propaganda advertises, and are compliant subjects for
their hidden and self-determined overlords. This might be called
government from underneath a rock. The persecutions and exploitations are
just as vile, if not more vile, because they are hidden. The entire
culture suffers, but no one seems to notice the absence of real dissent or
fresh ideas or leaders coming from outside the corrupt two-party system.
It is like
American marketers might even portray this new feudal and repressive
state as some sort of advance. For greedy fascists without consciences
and who can manage to stay on the exploiting side rather than becoming one of
the exploited it might be a real ``paradise.'' I hope historians for
centuries hence will see the current American leadership as the
Let us assume a counterfactual for a moment and suppose that the
It really is that bad: evolved torture techniques, a neutron bomb that
destroys the person from within while society can ignore it. Understand,
this is known stuff and much is admitted by the government; but still no
actions are taken. While the government has only admitted a grain of sand
in the desert of its atrocities, what we know is bad enough. And still
nothing happens and the politicians go on grandstanding, pretending nothing is
wrong, and stuffing their pockets. If someone came into your home and did
this to you or your family directly you would be
completely justified in shooting them dead -- and any jury in the country would
agree with you. But when government agents do the same things, its Nazi
pigs are protected and the victims are further smeared. If there is any
use for ``Old Sparky'' it is to fry these torturing, treasonous, Nazi pigs.
The Community Against Mind Control
The community against mind control is a varied one. There are
researchers who have uncovered mind control abuses (and then encountered the
mind control coverups), there are victims and their
families and friends, and there are other citizens who have heard and seen what
is going on, recognized its truth, and acted on it. There are a few
organizations set up to resist mind control, and several researchers and
activists who have worked on the issue and with victims for many years. I
will not name them here to avoid leaving anyone out. Fortunately or
unfortunately, there is no real unified leadership fighting mind control in the
First of all, being an outspoken critic of American mind control
atrocities is not helpful to one's career, finances, or health. Things
may get better as the atrocities gradually come more and more to light, but
harassment and surveillance are to be expected. People working against
mind control, especially when they are victims themselves, must deal with the
fact that they are being watched and their every move (and even thought) is
being analyzed. The criminal factions can move to thwart or counter any
move even before it happens. Remember, these are atrocities committed
against men, women, and children for years on end, committed by vicious and
amoral people with powerful connections and funding sources. They will threaten, blackmail, harass, and murder to conceal their
crimes. The lie of American freedom serves them well as cover for their
fascist tactics, but also makes them especially fear exposure for what they are
and what they have done against their own people.
Mind control victims themselves can be somewhat difficult to work with,
and for good reason. They have survived and are still coping with
almost unimaginable torture experiences and the associated psychological and physical
trauma (these would be called torture sequelae, but
the torture generally has not stopped and is ongoing). They have been
betrayed in the worst way imaginable by their own people. They have been
exploited and been put through experiences meant to demean them. They
have been slandered, blackmailed, and threatened. They have had their
minds repeatedly violated and often their bodies as well. They have seen
provocateurs disrupting anything that looks like it might achieve something and
know all too well about infiltration. They have watched their society and
seen how pervasive this modern-day system of torture and exploitation is in the
There are victims of various sorts of mind control experiments and
operations, from childhood induced trauma and conditioning, to hypnosis abuses,
to electromagnetic harassment, to covert drugging, to implanted devices, to
street theater to... In short, any sort of mind control technology and
technique the government has wanted to test it has tested on its unconsenting citizens. Thus there are many
different experiences, or clusters, of mind control victims. The people
themselves have varied backgrounds and have as an unfortunate commonality that
for whatever reason they were singled out and tortured. There are some
victims who have suffered brain damage and severe psychological problems as a
result of their torture. There also are truly mentally ill people, true
kooks, and provocateurs impersonating both to help discredit the real
victims. Many victims have a history of some connection to the military
or to an intelligence agency, which is sad but not surprising, and thus face
realistic suspicions that they are agents or plants. Altogether these
factors point to why mind control victims are reluctant to trust anyone, much
less someone claiming to be or touted as their leader. Thus there is
currently a sort of leaderless resistance to mind control, which I hope can be
more effective than it currently is.
Mind control victims are very much like prisoners of war who have been
tortured. The difference is that they generally do not know why they have
been tortured, they do not have their own army or support system, and they have
been tortured by citizens of their own country. That,
and the torture is generally ongoing and has not stopped. Rather than any
sort of sympathy or respect for having ``served their country'' by being
selected for exploitation and torture for the sake of what is billed as
``national security'' or ``freedom,'' these veterans of mind control abuse are
subjected to ridicule and abuse. The psychological torture, and often the
physical torture, is ongoing.
The torture victims are supposed to second guess the reason for their
torture. Why were they selected? What is so special about
them? Their being selected for torture might even be portrayed as some
sort of flattering attention that needs a special explanation, lest they be
accused of having delusions of grandeur.
State and Societal Methods to Continue and Conceal Ongoing Mind Control
Operations
The primary method used to conceal and continue ongoing mind control
operations is secrecy. The weapons used are highly classified, and those
who abuse them to summarily torture American citizens
benefit from a conspiracy -- as defined in the dictionary -- to conceal their
crimes. Secrecy is the American passion; it is the way the
The psychiatric and psychological communities are also used as tools in
the repression and torture of American citizens. Sometimes wittingly,
sometimes unwittingly, mental health workers aid in and help cover up mind
control operations in the
Secondly, the mental health community aids in repression by directly
diagnosing and even institutionalizing against their will people who claim to
be mind control victims. This is nothing short of the former Soviet
system of using psychiatry to discredit and silence dissidents and others,
though with a typical American spin involving layers of lies and secrecy.
There truly are mentally ill people, and their illnesses are unfortunately used
as cover lies for torture. This is just another sad reflection on a profession
sworn to ``do no harm.'' Aside from a few trusted practitioners, the
mental health community and system should be considered collaborators in
American repression, at least until their diagnostic manuals have entries for
electronic and other mind control, nonconsensual experimentation, and trauma
and torture sequelae due to harassment campaigns like
those the U.S. government has carried out for years against its own
people. The psychiatric community is used to enforce belief in the
socially demanded delusion that the
Next, there is the American press. These liars participate in coverups of all sorts of intelligence community atrocities,
while at the same time preaching about freedom of the press and their mythical
watchdog roles. A recent canonical example is provided by the mainstream
papers' attempts at discrediting and smearing the few journalists who dared to
report CIA knowledge of Contra drug trafficking -- even though it was already
known from Senate hearings years earlier. [In an interesting two-birds
scenario, at the same time this cocaine was being imported the zero-tolerance
just-say-no campaign was going full force, and our prisons were being filled to
world-record levels with inner city users and sellers of some of this same
cocaine.] Even when the CIA finally admitted as much in its own reports,
the press would not report it accurately, let alone apologize to the actual
reporters they had smeared. This is what the dictionary and the law define as a conspiracy. Most media outlets in the
Not only will the press not openly report ongoing mind control abuses and
torture, many in the press act as apologists for it and even as participants in
the torture. Many mind control victims have become very familiar with the
way that symbols and codewords are used to both let
the victims know they are under surveillance and to attempt to smear and
discredit them. This coded and between-the-lines speech is apparently
standard issue in the intelligence and diplomatic communities, while ordinary
citizens tend to scoff at the notion of basic ``English 101''-type symbolism
being used by journalists and spies. Deniability is the principle.
Have your cake and deny it too.
The techniques for deniable smears include making the smears either be so
specific or so general that they can be denied -- and these deniable smears can
be distributed across the entire media spectrum like other concerted propaganda
campaigns. An example of the specific sense would be what the victim ate
last night or what the victim's spouse said
during sex (intended to harass and goad). The general smear could be
general stories about things the victim has recently done or been interested
in. These are deniable, though the victim knows, and is supposed to know,
but cannot say or do much for fear of being called insane. This is combined
with symbolic and between-the-lines ``stories'' dealing with the victim in a
deniable way, smears by juxtaposition, soundalike
phrases, and the whole bag of psyop tricks and ways
to communicate (or in this case harass) between the lines. [When you
start to pick up the messages between the lines, be aware that there are often
more lies between the lines than on them.] Some of these smears are so
stupid that you would laugh in the torturer's face if the smear did not reveal
human rights violations against the victim or you did not know the absolutely
vicious intent the torturer had.
The press techniques used mirror some of those reported to have been used
by the CIA in manipulating South and Central American populations via
psychological operations carried out through the media. It is no surprise
at all that these techniques would have been brought back and diffused into the
To discredit mind control victims, the media will play them up as
schizophrenic kooks. Acts of physical and psychological terror by the
government are ignored, while those speaking out against such terror are
ridiculed. The
In a larger sense, the press engages in what Jeff Cohen has called
propaganda from the center. I would modify that by saying that the press
and the government engage in both propaganda and terrorism from the phony
center. The phony center is the place where the system works. It is
the place where no human rights violations happen within the
In the service of the phony center, the press also utilizes a
``triangulation strategy'' to soften and minimize the most egregious atrocities
taking place in the country. If there were a chance that people might
learn of the secret government literally holding people as electronic slaves in
distributed concentration camps created from the victim's own homes and minds,
the CIA would be portrayed as fighting the slave trade overseas. See, I
cannot argue with fighting slavery overseas. It is a good thing, assuming
it is real and not just more PR propaganda. But now it has purposely distracted
from the domestic abuses. The general rule is to triangulate by
emphasizing something similar to the domestic problem except that it is not
quite so bad or is committed by bad criminals the government is chasing or by
foreign groups or governments. It masks the most serious abuses (people
can only concentrate on so many things). Someone not familiar with the
idea of masking by triangulation might even think someone in the press was
trying to help but, gosh, here at least is a watered-down something.
Triangulation here is similar to the ``limited hang-out'' strategy so
often used by intelligence agencies when they fear worse exposures of their
crimes. That is, they admit a few abuses that are bad but hardly the
worst abuses or the bulk of the abuses, play up those admissions for a time,
and then declare that ``it's time to move on.'' Amazingly enough, after a
few years they often begin denying and hiding the few admissions they actually
made and we have what Robert Parry has called lost history (though most of the
actual history was never revealed anyway).
Finally, in denying and covering up mind control crimes there are witting
``assets'' and collaborators in all parts of society. To say it is Stasi-like is not going too far. Some are profiting
directly from this exploitation and enslavement, while others profit indirectly
or hope to not become another victim by collaborating. Too many Americans
are just plain cruel and barbaric. There are ``assets,'' apologists, and
collaborators in the advertising and entertainment businesses, in academia, in
science and engineering, anywhere you might look. Some are likely just
following the cues of the unspoken dialogue and symbolism, while others are
directly connected. Some may be mind control victims themselves, aware of
it or not. This is a real, live conspiracy of the sort that Americans
love to ridicule others for pointing out. I do not put anything past people who
would participate in systematic torture, including manufacturing news ``events''
for distracting, discrediting, and as a launching point for their desired spin.
Consider that the Church report only scratched the surface of the abuses
then, and that things got worse through the 80s and 90s, and you may get some
inkling of the true situation.
Methods of Protest and Resistance
This is a listing of various possible methods to protest and resist the
crime against humanity that mind control torture really is. They are
listed very roughly in order of increasing severity and confrontation.
They are not mutually exclusive, of course, and several or many could and
should be employed at once. I would urge people not to act in rage,
especially on some of the more extreme actions. Acting in rage may result
in your being manipulated by others. Any actions should be undertaken
with premeditated thought and understanding of the implications. On the
more extreme actions there is no rush (unless you feel like it, with your true
free mind). Be prepared from the start for the long term, and keep your eyes
on the prize, so to speak.
Contacting law enforcement, like the FBI.
This is typically the first thing someone does when a violent crime has been
committed. (It may take a mind control victim some time to realize what
is going on, and that such vicious mind manipulations are in fact being
directed against him or her in a concerted manner. That is, it may take
some time to realize that it can and does ``happen here'' even though we do not
see such crimes openly reported in the paper or on the evening news.) In
the case of mind control and electromagnetic harassment crimes this option has
proved to be of no value whatsoever. I do not know of one case where this
resulted in any investigation or anything other than polite dismissal, at the very
best. Some mind control victims are afraid to contact the
authorities. This may be because they fear further abuse or fear that any
investigation will turn against them when back channels are utilized by their
torturers. Psyops typically employ such
threats, including blackmail threats based on anything observed over years of
torture/surveillance, physical threats against loved ones, and purposely
instilled distrust of anyone who might be able to help.
There is also good reason to believe that the FBI is in fact directly
involved as the harasser in many cases. Historically, the FBI has made
both a study and a practice of targeting and harassing American citizens.
The FBI without a doubt knows about the sort of electronic weaponry that many
victims say has been used to harass and torture them. They have held
classified conferences where they discuss such weapons and plan for sharing
this technology with other law enforcement agencies -- yet they still deny that
the technology exists. These would be called secret police tactics in
most other nations, but the perception management of the American citizenry
requires that such descriptions not become commonly used here.
Legal actions. When the authorities
are no help, many people turn to the judicial system for relief. First,
one has to find a lawyer willing to take the case. This can be difficult
in itself, as many lawyers either refuse to believe the victims or else want
nothing to do with challenging the secret government. Even lawyers willing
to take the cases may lack the specific expertise needed in national security
law. Assuming a lawyer has been found, there remains the problem of
gathering evidence for use in court -- evidence of a crime that has been
tailored over the years precisely not to leave such evidence.
Surveillance and harassment will be used to attempt to thwart any effective
actions of the victim, he or she will not be able to act in private, and
certainly will not be allowed private counsel with lawyer-client privilege.
Finally, assuming a lawyer has been found and a case put together there remains
the problem that the courts are heavily stacked in favor of secret government
agencies.
At some point, if any progress is being made at all, there will be a
claim of national security and the government will move for dismissal. If
the victim is lucky enough to get to this stage the trial will be dragged out
for years and cost hundreds of thousands of dollars -- all while the torture
goes on and the victim's whole life is derailed and devoted to regaining his or
her fundamental human rights. (This process in practice reveals what a
farce the American participation in international treaties like those against
torture and slavery is, since the
A common misconception is that there is no law against what the mind
control torturers are doing, that it is somehow ``legal.'' While it would
be helpful and useful to have new laws on the books to more specifically
protect the mind control victims and make people aware of such crimes, there
are plenty of laws currently on the books that could be used to stop the
torture and punish the torturers. In American law it a matter of if there
is a will there is a way. (This is illustrated in the selective
prosecutions and in the ignoring of the clear crimes of the powerful that
happens all the time in American ``justice.'') While this trend that
mocks the rule of law usually works against justice, if we can generate the
political will we may be able to get some justice.
Letter writing, direct contact with legislators.
In a functioning representative government, citizens should be able to contact
their representatives when the usual system has failed them. Mind control
victims can indeed contact their representatives, but to little effect.
Some representatives simply ignore or throw away letters from mind control
victims. Others may make a few inquiries that get nowhere and then give
up. The political facts are that most representatives have almost no
power when it comes to investigating abuses of the intelligence apparatus
(though they do not want to let on that they are powerless in that regard).
Some representatives have been co-opted into the intelligence community and
actually run interference for the agencies rather than representing their
constituents who are undergoing torture. This is terribly expedient for
them, since they know they cannot be held accountable for actions they take in
secret. (Some representatives may just be naive and fall for the slide
shows of lies that spies like to give to representatives in secret sessions,
knowing that no one has the chance to counter their misinformation.)
Nonetheless, one can hope that there are some decent people left in government
who recognize what is happening. Phone calls and paper letters to
legislators tend to be more effective than email.
Our nation is wealthy and we are continually assured that the economy is
good. The cold war supposedly ended. If the American political
system cannot deal with the nation's continuing atrocities under these
conditions, when can it?
Direct political activity. Voting
is only a part of the direct political activities that can be undertaken.
The problem is the lack of candidates and politicians willing to deal with
these issues. Even a few politicians with real spines, not worried about
their own reelection but about doing what is right, could start to make a
difference. For now, working at the primary and grass-roots level may be
more effective than waiting until the standard Democrat and Republican are
selected and presented as a choice. Third parties can bring new issues to
the table. If we can figure out who in the government is secretly
anti-human rights we can work to ensure that those people are not reelected,
since they have no place in public government -- and if they are themselves
responsible for torture they belong in prison. The barrier here is the
abuse of secrecy in government to keep the public from knowing. If we
could get a few roll-call votes on important human rights issues those could be
used as a voting guide -- but always watch out for phony legislation designed
only to give the illusion of human rights support. The important part of
the voting is not just your single vote but to campaign tirelessly yourself and
with others against modern-day Nazis hiding anywhere in government.
Appeals to human rights organizations.
Mind control victims have appealed to human rights organizations for years,
trying to get them to focus their attention on domestic, covert human rights
abuses. For years they have been rebuffed or ignored. Human rights
organizations, many based in the
Appeals to the press. The American
press has already been discussed at length in this essay. Nonetheless,
there are still a few decent people in the press acting as real journalists who
may have the ability to get the truth out. People should also support
those decent journalists if the propagandist media turns on them, and remember
who the propagandists are. Support press organizations who tell the hard
but important truths.
Appeals to churches, religious organizations and other
groups who might be sympathetic. You can appeal to your
minister, priest, rabbi, roshi, etc., and the
congregation, sangha, or whatever the congregants are
called, in the name of whatever God or spirit or force or practice the religion
worships or advocates. Most religions at least give lip service to human
rights. It might help. You cannot have freedom of religion without the
freedom of thought, and some religious people have the sense to understand
this.
Some victims can also be helped, at least helped to cope with the
torture, by practicing whatever faith they still follow or believe. It is
important to always know that this has nothing to do with the Nazi pigs playing
at God and trying to steal away human dignity and free will.
I have thought for some time that mind control survivors might benefit
from contact with Holocaust survivors, if only to hear how they have coped for
so many years with the knowledge that their fellow human beings and countrymen
tried to exterminate them. How this lasting scar affected their families and
views (after their torture ordeal was actually over). I would hope they
at least see that these are Auchwitz-level
atrocities, being committed for decade after decade here in the
Teaching and educating the public. One thing mind control victims
can do is to try to teach and educate the public about the sorts of abuses that
have taken place in the past, as well as those which are ongoing. The
media and standard educational systems barely touch on these abuses. Much
of the technology involved in some of the abuse is actively denied, even that
which is definitely known to exist. There is no corresponding lack of
education regarding mental illnesses, which tend to be used to dismiss and
ridicule claims of mind control abuse. Possible methods are leaflets and
flyers, web sites, mailing lists, bumper stickers (``Visualize Domestic
State-Sponsored Terrorists in Prison''), and so forth, as well as just
broaching this forbidden topic in polite company. Trying to inform and
work with scientists, engineers, psychiatrists, historians, decent military
people, real journalists, etc., could be helpful.
Teach the young, if no one else, that their elders and societal leaders
-- and in some cases their own parents -- are stinking hypocrite liars who are
in league with Nazi-style criminals and torturers. Teach them what
``adulthood'' really means in a sick society based on lies. This is the
case just from known and acknowledged facts, though one has to dig a bit to
find them out in our information-controlled society. Think about when and
how, in the process of growing up, some people ``put on the swastika armband''
-- and how it can be prevented.
Do not back away from mental illness just because it has been used as a
cover lie for experimentation and abuse. This Soviet-style repression is
a reflection on American society and not on the unfortunate people repressed in
that manner. The truly mentally ill have it bad enough without their
government and society using their illnesses as a cover for torture and
repression. Not to mention the psychological scars inflicted by torture
on its victims.
If nothing else, record what has happened and what is happening for the
sake of history. Ethical standards were not ``different back then,'' when
back then is now (a favorite excuse of apologists). Make it so that years
from now any historian looking back will have to evaluate the lies and speeches
of the current politicians taking into account the vicious atrocities they are
complicit in. People so small as to support slavery and
exploitation, implicitly or explicitly, in the twenty-first century -- not the
1850s. ``Never again'' as an empty slogan (or referring to
historical Nazi conditions that are never likely to happen again exactly) is
worse than nothing, especially if it helps in dismissing current atrocities
that can ``never again happen'' but really are happening. Or if it gives
a misleading and false sense that someone might care and take some action when
new atrocities arise.
Researching mind control technologies and techniques.
Gathering any and all evidence and information on mind control harassment and
technology is a very positive thing, and I encourage it wholeheartedly.
One should not, though, mistake this for some preliminary step that must be
``completed'' before any other action can be taken. The main problem now
is a political one, not a technical one to show that the covert harassment and
devices exist. That it exists is clear to anyone who has really looked
into the situation. Those with a vested interest in denial will deny forever
if they have the chance.
Art. Various artistic media can be used to help people understand,
feel, and act. It can also help victims heal somewhat from the ongoing
abuse. But government propagandists can form rock bands, paint paintings,
etc., too. Perhaps more importantly, the propagandists can help market
any artists who are willing to sell their souls to torturers for some fame and
money -- or whose messages unwittingly happen to fit in with the propagandists'
current campaign.
Formal lobbying. These
days in
Publicity stunts. Sometimes it can
take outrageous stunts to get media attention. News is entertainment,
after all, and sometimes entertainment and ratings can be productively
leveraged against the prerogative of protecting the national security
establishment. (Perhaps I should say phony national security
establishment, since ``national security'' is only a buzzword that has long
been rendered meaningless and divorced from anything of the sort. Like
``sources and methods'' it is a magical incantation that means ``I am not
telling you anything, and watch out if you push it.'')
Greenpeace used to use publicity stunts to excellent effect. One
can hang huge signs, for example. Vietnam war
protesters used to claim that squirt guns full of water actually had LSD in
them, or they would ``levitate'' the Pentagon. How about spamming
millions of people to alert them to human rights abuses, rather than try to
sell them the usual ripoff? A problem with this
approach in resisting mind control fascism is that it might play into claims
that it was just some nutty schizophrenic acting up: ``We can laugh at it
and get some ratings points, but we all know that it is just some poor deluded
mentally ill person.''
Something like a hunger strike is hardly a ``stunt,'' but it can bring
attention to the matter and make clear what a life or death situation it
is. In the callous culture of the
Appealing to world opinion and international
organizations. Organizations like the
Calls for boycotts. Boycotts could
be called against any companies known to be involved in producing mind control
equipment or in covering up the ongoing atrocities. This might include
weapons producers, newspapers, psychological organizations, etc. Beyond
this, there could be a general call for people around the world to avoid buying
American products and traveling to the
Street protests. Taking to the
streets with signs and chants is a classic means of protest. Citizens who
pass by wonder what is going on, and can be given literature. A large
demonstration may get some notice in the local press. This could be an
effective method for drawing more attention to the problem. It does take
some organization to put together a demonstration, and investigation of local
laws for conducting demonstrations. A fair number of people need to be in
the same geographic area or willing to travel there. The government has
also in the past few decades studied and refined techniques
to disrupt and discredit street protests, and developed a whole new
generation of crowd-control weapons.
Building demonstration weapons. One
technique to get beyond the denials that mind control technology exists is to
build demonstration weapons. If someone were to build a microwave voice
projection weapon and publicly demonstrate it, it might get some publicity and
might make people aware of the very real threat that such weapons pose.
This still might not get through to hard-headed types with no imagination or
empathy who cannot understand -- or pretend not to understand -- the extreme
violation of having one's mind tampered with even when inside one's home,
potentially at any time of the day or night. That is, the horror of not
being able to trust your own thoughts, of being aversively conditioned by
nonconsensual behavior modification inside your home, and of knowing that your
tormentors are purposely inflicting psychological damage on you. All this taking place in a society that pretends it is not
happening, where the economy is good so everything must be all right, and where
the rhetoric all drips with mention of freedom, liberty, and human rights.
On the positive side, it would not take especially advanced technology to
demonstrate to people the basic capacity to turn someone's home into a personal
concentration camp. Basic electronic surveillance coupled with an
aversive stimulus generator like a targetable
microwave beam able to interfere with heart rhythms would suffice. One
could throw in devices based on the microwave hearing principle for good
measure.
On the negative side is the money and expertise required. Most victims,
like most citizens, are not technically trained and even those who are may lack
the specific training to design and construct such specialized devices.
Testing would also be necessary, and unlike the government's methods I do not
think randomly selected people should be used as guinea pigs. As a matter
of safety I might suggest testing a microwave voice projection device on dogs who were trained to obey spoken commands. If they
would perform their tricks with no other cues than the microwave induced
commands played from an audio tape it could reasonably be assumed that they
heard the command (or at least perceived the microwave stimulation if correct
responses to the microwave signals are reinforced).
An added benefit of this animal testing, or of stating an intention to do
such testing, is that it would generate outrage. Americans can be totally
indifferent when human beings are being systematically tortured for years on end, but let them hear that you might fry a dog's brain and
they would suddenly be outraged and appalled. [We are human beings
interacting in a human society; that is why human rights are so
important. For example, if animal rights activists were to begin to make
serious progress in their cause, and were then seen as a threat rather than as
a useful but harmless distraction for people who might otherwise seriously
challenge the state, they would soon find their human rights to speak,
associate, and organize to be in grave peril.] Practically speaking the
frequencies for dog skulls may differ from those of humans. And of course
these weapons have already been tested for years both on animals and humans by
their developers.
Another negative to demonstration weapons is that even after all the
demonstrations the public may still be indifferent. The usual naysayers would say that now you have demonstrated this one
method, but that it still does not explain effect X or Y that a given victim
has experienced. Or else they would say that now all you have to do is
shield against microwaves or measure them to get tangible proof. But
microwaves used in this fashion are only one small (and perhaps long obsolete)
part of the arsenal of electromagnetic and acoustic weapons that can be used in
mind control operations. It is a losing proposition for a few poorly
funded citizens to attempt to re-engineer all the results of literally decades
of research on which billions of dollars have been directly or indirectly
spent. Building demonstration weapons might further the proliferation of
these denied weapons, but they are out there already.
As far as getting attention, imagine the following scenario.
Suppose someone built, or simply claimed to have built, a subliminal
influencing device capable of subtly influencing a whole town full of people --
perhaps by generating some form of modulated ELF radiation. Suppose they
then claimed that they were going to turn it on full blast on the day before a
general election. That might at least get people thinking about the
fragility of democracy (and with truly advanced technology the farce of
democracy) when such weapons are shrouded in secrecy and used on the general
population.
Leaving the country. I am sure that
most people who have been victimized by state-sanctioned terror here in the
One problem with leaving the country is where to go. Where does the
long arm of
Currently, most countries would probably not grant official political
asylum since it would be a slap in the face of a powerful and vengeful
There is uncertainty about whether there is any place one can go to
escape the torture and surveillance. There may be psyops
aimed at keeping some victims from leaving the country, especially if they
might obtain something like MRI evidence of what was done to them here or if
their exploitation is considered especially valuable. There may also be psyops aimed at getting other people to leave the country
if they are making too many waves here. In the ways of American society,
one might be subjected to playground taunts for leaving, like you are ``running
away from a fight,'' and so forth. Playground taunts mean nothing compared
to having ones mind, life, and family constantly violated and I would not hold
it against anyone if they took the next plane out. I may yet do the same.
Civil disobedience. Historically,
civil disobedience has included actions like people chaining themselves to
doorways, blocking traffic, and trespassing on government property to protest
its policies. Other possible actions might include painting anti-mind
control graffiti on walls, buildings and monuments. Civil disobedience
might also include using the judicial system in ways to purposely slow it down
and interfere with its normal operation, as a protest against its unwillingness
to deal with government atrocities. I have wondered at times about the
engineering feasibility of putting a cable around the neck of the
Tax revolt. This is essentially a
form of civil disobedience, to refuse to pay taxes to the illegitimate
government that tortures and holds its own citizens as slaves. Having to
pay the torturers' salaries is like adding insult to injury. Morally
there is nothing wrong with a truly conscientious decision not to pay taxes to
an illegitimate occupation government, but practically speaking this may not be
the best way to resist. Setting people up for politically motivated
audits is an old American trick, and if there is something there for auditors
to catch it is that much more effective.
If the IRS agents cart you off to jail for tax evasion you will likely
not get out the message you would have wanted to. Tax collectors, like
law enforcement officers, would also still be necessary under a legitimate
government. In a sense they are the pawns of the people really calling
the shots (which is not to excuse knowing abuses by
such officials). The people calling the shots would love to incite a
proxy war between, say, police officers and demonstrators because they then
have discredited the demonstrators, hardened the police citizens and other
citizens against the cause of the demonstrators, and gained a platform for more
militarization of law enforcement.
Economic sabotage. The ancient Egyptians
would not free Moses' people until a host of plagues was called down on their
kingdom. Human nature has not changed since then, and Americans have a long and
sad history of clinging to blatantly exploitative practices at all costs --
while always pontificating about freedom. Some people might decide that
if they are not allowed to receive equal benefits in a society then those who
implicitly or explicitly benefit from their exploitation should not have the
fruits of that exploitation. The idea of economic sabotage is to disrupt
the economy and cost it money. Americans, at least those in charge,
simply do not care about the cries of domestic torture
victims. What they do care about is money. The idea then is to make
their repression and torture cost them money. In some sense this is the
same philosophy as in calling for boycotts, but more direct. This is the
first of the ideas on the list that the American state-sponsored terrorists and
propagandists would likely shout ``terrorist'' about.
To conduct such economic sabotage it first has to be clear to those in charge (and preferably to the public at large) what
was done and why it was done. Let me describe an example where one or a
few people can incur huge costs. It is only an example, of course.
Suppose someone were able to obtain a quantity of toxic waste, for example
several drums of PCBs. Suppose they then drove around a major city at
night spreading those chemicals and then announced to a newspaper, to
authorities, and on the internet what they had done it and why. Publicity
is important here because otherwise the government could ignore it like it does
so many other things. It could then take literally tens or hundreds of
millions of dollars to clean up that toxic waste. The idea is to cost
money, and not to harm people, so this particular plan would have to be
tailored for that. As for environmentalists who might react with horror
to this very suggestion, I feel about the same to them as I do toward animal
rights activists who are horrified that a dog might be experimented on:
There are human beings being subjected to systematic, long term torture.
I'll take their outrage too, as preferable to their indifference to vicious
ongoing atrocities. Environmental activists have been the target of enough cointelpro actions that they should be in a better position
than many others to understand something about the daily torture inflicted on
mind control victims.
Various economic sabotage methods have been perfected and practiced by
covert organizations like the CIA for years. If nothing else, this is telling
about how segments of the
Even though these are tried and true CIA methods, used on peasants and
ordinary men, women, and children around the world to incite unrest against
their governments, a drawback is that the American propaganda machine will
portray these as terrorist acts rather than as acts of freedom fighters.
If these acts so much as cause the hair on someone's head to get ruffled, the
film crews will roll and the same media that would not touch years of
systematic domestic torture will have a field day empathizing with and pointing
out the ruffled hair inflicted by those horrible terrorists.
One predictable consequence would be for those feeding at the trough of
government to write neat little proposals to obtain money to strengthen and
defend the infrastructure -- with the implicit but always unspoken purpose of
``defending'' from possible attack by other Americans fighting against domestic
U.S. state-sponsored torture.
Direct violent action. This option is
often considered taboo to even mention, but years of American principles
actually support the right of the people to resist tyrants who would enslave
them. These principles mean something to me, if not to lying hypocrites
who think the Constitution is just a big poster to put up behind themselves at a photo op. Sometimes it is a time for
war, especially in self-defense against those who would enslave you and violate
your home and family. People like to cite Martin Luther King, Jr. as an
example of non-violence in practice. First of all, as much as I respect King,
I suspect he might not have been nearly as successful as he was if there were
not more extreme elements that the elites could consider him as a moderating
influence to. Even so, the power elites attempted to replace him with
their own puppets, they harassed him, they placed him under surveillance, they
spread around embarrassing tapes of him to the press and to their friends
attempting to discredit him, and then he was shot dead. The elites
finally decided that the day of overt repression and exploitation had
passed. So, rather than ending, such exploitation ``went black'' behind a
wall of lies, secrecy, and propaganda.
As an example of direct violent action, suppose someone developed a
demonstration weapon like a portable microwave beam weapon, and set out to use
it against legislators, government officials, and journalists who were deemed
to be collaborators or apologists for the torture of innocent American
citizens. If nothing else these people would get a good idea of the sort
of fascist torture they directly or indirectly support against other Americans.
Thinking along these lines you realize that the secret government already
poses such a threat to these people, and that the secret government's weapons
are more advanced and can be employed more subtly. This very threat, with
or without the blackmail that spies are known for, may be enough to keep these
collaborators in the fascist camp. A critical mass of
cowards and expedient, greedy, amoral fascists. An aversive
directed energy experience in the middle of the night might serve as a
``wake-up call.''
One problem with direct violent action is where and against whom to
direct that action. A fortified base or command and control center
involved in coordinating or conducting mind control operations, even if its
location were known, is not likely to be very vulnerable to anything a regular
citizen could muster against it. Any attack would be symbolic at best and
quite likely result in the death of the attacker. (Then again, someone
driven to suicide anyway by being harassed and tortured might reason that it is
better to take one or two of the torturing Nazis with him or her rather than to
die alone in misery.) Of course someone under constant surveillance
anyway is not going to have the element of surprise.
Beyond these problems, though, there are active efforts by the torturers
to conceal the guilty parties and to confuse and misdirect the victims.
They would probably think it was really funny to goad someone into attacking a
completely innocent person -- or better, a person who for some reason they
wanted to see hurt. Suppose a mind control victim took a gun to a
government building and shot some people he had determined were complicitous in some way with his torture. First, we
all know how the press would play it: a lone nut schizophrenic went crazy and
shot someone. His claims of being mind controlled would be held up as
supporting that.
Now, the targeted people or organization might be the actual mind
controllers, or the person might have been tricked by what is called a
deception operation. Suppose the victims were not directly involved, but
that they had plenty of collaborator, profiteer, apologist
blood on their hands and were easier to get to than cowardly torturers hiding
in a fortified bunker. Suppose the mind control victim were crying out
from torture to send a message. Would the targeted organization or
society at large get the actual message? They might, or they might get
another message entirely. They might consider that the person was goaded
and directed by the mind controllers into attacking them, and take this as an
implicit threat by the mind controllers that they had better not cause any
trouble because there are more Manchurians out there.
Besides the direct propaganda use, there would be a greater tendency for
members of society to develop a fortress mentality and barricade themselves
against the ``ordinary people.'' For example, after targeting a known
pseudo-journalist propagandist and torturer, the resulting propaganda storm
might be used to drive even the few decent journalists into high-security
enclaves and further accelerate their separation from ordinary people that has
been going on for some time.
Even assuming that the targeting of directly complicitous
torturers could be done correctly, the use of direct violence might be
counterproductive. A standard propaganda technique to distract from
protest and resistance is to highlight (or create) instances of unpopular
groups like racists engaging in similar resistance tactics. The usual
propaganda war...
For all these reasons and more, violence is a last resort. When it
is realistically the only way to possibly secure fundamental human rights
within a tangible time period, though, it is a way that must be taken.
Summary and Conclusions
First, I will re-list all of the possible methods for protest and
resistance given above. After having read the descriptions above it may
be helpful to now see just the paragraph headers all together.
Contacting law enforcement, like the FBI.
Legal actions.
Letter writing, direct contact with legislators.
Direct political activity.
Appeals to human rights organizations.
Appeals to the press.
Appeals to churches, religious organizations and other
groups who might be sympathetic.
Teaching and educating the public.
Researching mind control technologies and techniques.
Art.
Formal lobbying.
Publicity stunts.
Appealing to world opinion and international
organizations.
Calls for boycotts.
Street protests.
Building demonstration weapons.
Leaving the country.
Civil disobedience.
Tax revolt.
Economic sabotage.
Direct violent action.
Believe me, I know the sorts of reactions that this essay may cause, both
from people who know it is true and from the sorts of people who just cannot
believe that their TV would actually deceive them and lie to them.
Nonetheless, it must be said and actions must be taken. A current
euphemism is that the government is developing non-lethal ``weapons of mass
protection,'' but the reality is that these are weapons of mass
enslavement. We either arbeit
for our freedom or we arbeit for our slavemasters. This is not a short term thing,
and all citizens need to be made aware that their remaining freedoms are at
risk. No one is going to ``do it for us,'' but if we all do what we can
and get others to join in we can change things together. A million small
actions can bring about a large positive change; a million wrenches in the works
can shut down a corrupt machine.
Everyone has their own special talents, opportunities, and situation, and
can focus on what he or she can best do to start setting things right. It
can help to form alliances, but beware of alliances that are meant to tear down
or discredit real human rights movements such as those against mind control
abuses. We cannot afford to tie our demands for basic human rights to
anything trivial, though of course I would not put down people for working on
other causes too. This is a long term problem which will require a
commitment to keep pushing for freedom and justice, so people need to also live
the their ``regular'' lives as best as they can at the same time. But
focusing only on the equivalent of a highway beautification project in Nazi
We need to try to form alliances with other groups working for
fundamental human rights, or who recognize how such rights underlie our entire
society. You cannot build any sort of civil, legitimate society without
the foundation of human rights. Good people can disagree on many things,
but fundamental human rights is not one of them.
It's the torture, stupid. The sorts of things that are being done
to people in the
|
[This is a draft version of the final essay in
the series. Before editing and revising to the final version I really
need to let it settle a few months, at least. On the other hand, it may
help some people -- especially victims. For this reason I am making this
early draft version available. This will also allow me to incorporate
people's constructive comments and suggestions into the final version. By
the way, I started writing this long before the current situation in
Part III: Mental Firewalls (DRAFT)
Allen Barker,
This is the third of a three-part series of essays on mind control.
As the earlier essays explained, "mind control" is the term commonly
and historically used to describe clandestine operations to alter human
behavior and thought. The series focuses mainly on high-technology
techniques involving, for example, surveillance devices and electromagnetic
weapons -- though victims of all sorts of mind control techniques have common
experiences and sequelae. The first essay of
the series, “Motives for Mind Control" dealt with some of the reasons that
mind control harassment, torture, and exploitation happen and why it
continues. The second part, "Resisting the
This essay is written from the point of view of someone experiencing real
torture from externally induced mind control phenomena, including induced
voices in the head, surveillance, harassment from various sources, and nonlethal aversive jolts. While I make no secret of
the fact that I personally have been subjected to a similar sort of mind
control torture, this is not my story. Of course it is influenced by
events I have experienced, but the essay is a composite from my interactions
with many mind control victims (and provocateurs) over the past few
years. I will save the actual details of my own experiences for my
lawyers or for prosecutors when that time comes, or perhaps for other writings
I might choose to make public. Thus, in keeping with the earlier parts of
the series, you do not even have to believe me about my torture -- though it
all happened. There are many people in the world, including many American
citizens, who have experienced very similar things. You can even think
that all of those people made it all up, and still have to be concerned despite
your Holocaust denial. The technology undoubtedly exists right now to
carry out the sorts of torture operations described in this essay, and will
only become more advanced with time.
I cover a lot of different techniques and possibilities in this essay,
but keep in mind that the truth is bad enough. What we already know is
bad enough and only the tip of the iceberg. In the spirit of mentioning
all the possibilities, though, let me briefly discuss mental illness
here. There truly are some people with mental illnesses which occur
naturally. There are also people with mental illnesses which are
externally and purposely inflicted. And there are mind control victims
who are completely normal except that they have undergone years and years of
some of the most hideous torture imaginable -- in a lying, despicable society
that denies it, ignores it, and further tortures the victims. We know
this from documented sources; what the government has admitted is bad
enough. I hope this essay will prove helpful even to victims who suffer
from true mental illness. I call them victims also because the cowardly
Most people are still free to think what they want -- to the extent that
that still means anything -- and some will try to second guess the victims and
provide armchair diagnoses of the victims' problems. People who try to
dismiss true torture victims as just mentally ill will receive and deserve the
utmost contempt from the victims and from those decent people who know what is
really going on. And we will remember. For the reasons described in
Part II, the psychiatric and psychological "communities" cannot be
trusted, except for a few actual healers here and there.
Much of this essay contains a sort of analysis that it is fashionable
among the pseudo-intelligensia to dismiss as just
black-and-white thinking. These people have their sixth-grade epiphany
that not everything is black-and-white, and for the rest of their lives go
around justifying anything convenient with this amoral relativism. They
never realize (or it just does not suit their lies) that while nothing is
black-and-white, some things are close enough that they might as well be.
I will be writing about Nazi pigs, and I mean this in the sense of "Mengele the Nazi pig," not any other cultural pig
association. Those who dismiss this sort of thinking perhaps would think
differently if they had ever experienced real torture or were capable of the
slightest bit of empathy. There is no doubt that this sort of thinking
has been misused and misapplied at various times, but I cannot worry about how
every moron might misunderstand or misapply what I write. People may well
misapply things I have written here, or use them to create some propaganda
distraction from what I am actually writing about, but I am describing it the
way it is. If you don't call a Nazi a Nazi you end up with Nazism by some
other name.
Every victim has had to develop his or her own method of coping with the
torture. I am not trying to impose my methods on anyone. A
religious person under torture finds strength in his or her religion, so some
Zen Buddhist philosophy may necessarily be apparent in my writing. In the
ignorant
I hope that this essay will help some victims. I know that I have
benefited from the work of other victims who had the courage to speak out about
their experiences. Much of this essay deals with the mental
"game" of mind control, which is of course not a game at all to the
torture victims. You can compare it to having to face mock executions
each day. There is also the physical intimidation many victims
experience. As a victim might put it, if it is all in my head then who
harassed me on the highway? Why did my mail all arrive opened? Why
did my phone regularly ring twice a day with hang-up calls? Why did a police
car pull up beside mine every time I talked about
What is a Firewall?
For the purposes of this essay, let me digress a bit here and describe
the concept of a firewall. A firewall, in the historical sense, is a wall
built between connected buildings and specifically constructed so that a fire
in one unit of the structure will not spread to the other units. In a
more recent sense, a firewall is a device on a computer network that keeps
nodes of the network separated, for instance so that a hacker attack on one
node of the network cannot spread to connected nodes of the network.
For our purposes, we can consider all the computers on a network to be
like houses on a street. (Network engineers, please bear with me.)
Each house has several doors into it, which correspond to what are called ports
on a networked computer. A computer actually has thousands of ports, but
the principle is illustrated by considering a house with several doors.
All the houses have inhabitants in them, who send out messengers to the other
houses: But some houses send out the equivalent of burglars also.
When the inhabitants of one house want to communicate with the inhabitants of
another, they send a messenger to a particular door of the house they want to
communicate with. The messenger knocks on the door.
Now, the inhabitants of the house can either open the door and let the
messenger in or ignore the knock. If they let the messenger in, they can
restrict what he is allowed to do while in the house. The messenger may,
for example, pick up a piece of paper and carry it back to his house.
This would correspond to a file transfer over a network. If the
inhabitants of the house accidentally leave a door open, though, a messenger
may be able to come in the house without permission and do whatever they like,
again without permission. (There are many doors because a messenger
occupies a particular door the whole time he is "in the house.")
A firewall, in this analogy, would correspond to a complete facade built
around a house (or group of houses, to be picky). The actual house is not
even visible from the street. The doors of the original house are only
visible to messengers if the inhabitants of the
house build corresponding doors in the facade. To enter the house in this
scenario, a messenger would have to first knock at some visible door of the
facade, be allowed in, and then knock at and be allowed into the actual door of
the house. In this way the security of the house is greatly increased
from unwanted intrusions. (And you can have a collection of trusted
houses "inside the fort" which are less protected from each other.)
The title of this essay, "Mental Firewalls," comes from an
article by Timothy L. Thomas which appeared in the
Thomas' article was in fact entered into evidence as part of a lawsuit by
Harlan Girard of the International Committee for the Convention Against Offensive Microwave Weapons. The article's
central metaphor is that human beings are like the computers on a network,
except that they do not have the ability to control the information traffic
entering and leaving them. Their ports, or doors, are wide open.
This sort of analogy was prevalent during the military "information
warfare" buzzword phase, and illustrates the sort of thinking that was
going on at the time. [On a note of caution, not all of Thomas' article
should be taken literally; whether purposefully or not there is some likely disinfo there.]
What is it that corresponds to your reality? What do you perceive,
and how do you make your decisions? You receive information through your
eyes, ears, and other senses. You read the information from the writers
you choose to read and listen to the speakers you have access to, very often
these days from TV, radio, or the internet. You think to yourself, in
your private inner voice. You visualize and imagine. In information
warfare against individuals all of these are thought of as nothing but
information channels that can be blocked, censored, co-opted, faked, forged,
impersonated, or otherwise controlled to manipulate an individual. If you
can control all the information an individual receives then you can control
their whole perceived reality. Like the hypnotized subject who does
something which violates his ethics while being persuaded to imagine he is doing
something else entirely, the information warfare subject is acting in a fantasy
world created precisely to manipulate him to do what his controllers
want. This is known as a deception operation.
Such complete control, as far as I know, is not yet possible, but the
principles still hold for whatever approximation can be achieved. And the
principles have been put into practice. Of course "information
warfare" is a buzzword and most of it is just a take on the ages-old
practices of propaganda, lying, and manipulation. But a new buzzword
generates funding, and perhaps more importantly serves to morally distance the
new "clean" practices from the dirty, filthy business of amorally
manipulating human beings like pawns, with complete disregard for unalienable
human rights. What was new at the time of information warfare was 1) the
internet as a widespread societal force, and 2) the wider development of neuroinfluencing and so-called nonlethal
weapons that can directly influence people's brains.
As medicine and technology develop ever more advanced prosthetic devices
people will increasingly become cyborgs -- as is
already happening. This will cause these issues to become increasingly
clear with time. That is, it will become common to have computer devices
implanted in one's body. If someone hacks into your home computer and
steals or manipulates your data then a crime has been committed and you should
rightly be angry. But if someone hacks into your physical body, brain,
and mind the violation is incomparably greater.
The Basic Modern Mind Control Torture Operation
In this section I will describe the basic torture setup used against our
hypothetical, composite mind control torture victim. The focus is on the
effects that the victim experiences, not necessarily the particular technology
that is used to inflict it. Remember in all of this that the torture any
individual receives can vary. It will vary according to the torturers'
motives and technology, but will also be tailored to the psychology of the victim.
What might bother one person would not bother another. The
"professional" torturers will start according to how their torture
manuals say to go about torturing someone with your profile, but almost all
torturers will refine the torture to the individual if they can. As they
learn what bothers you they can focus on that more and more in their
torture. As you read this, keep that in mind. These torturers are
not any different from the sort you might read about in Red Cross literature,
who shock the genitals of victims, etc., except that they have access to abuse
the most advanced technology and hide behind an evil U.S. government which
sinks to the lowest common denominator of the torturers it protects.
It is natural for humans to think about other people. It is even
natural to run a simulacrum process to imagine and empathize with other
people. Monkey see, monkey do, air guitar, "I was just thinking of
you..." The rapist idiot pigshits try to
turn this against the human beings they torture. Sex is also a natural
process, as is farting, masturbation, defecation, burping, spats with people,
fantasy, and so forth. The rapist torturers
try to turn this against their victims. Worrying and anxiety are also
normal human emotions. The Nazi pigs, though, try to turn all of these
human properties against their victims.
One technique the pigs use is to try to reinforce anything you might
worry about or feel anxious about. It is like taking a dynamical system
and driving it at its natural frequency in order to purposely destroy it.
Of course this is not to say the idiots know anything about dynamical
systems. If you ever read Lord of the Flies in junior high school you
know about the level that these pig idiots operate at, but when they rape your
brain to inflict such ridicule and hatefullness it
sets up positive feedback processes in the brain that constitute torture.
(If I am teaching these idiots anything by this, then you had better watch out
because they have already tortured me.) They will purposely injure you
and then pick at your scabs if you start to heal.
This process also happens because you know damn well you are under
surveillance and the pig ridicule squad is there to taunt you. Try not thinking
about something you are conditioned with "cattle prods" into knowing
will result in harassment. You know the torturers will zap you -- that is
why they goad you with it at times -- but it is like not thinking of a pink
elephant on command. Yins produce yangs, so to speak. Transcending the yins and yangs is hard enough without
the torture.
The pigs treat your personal, private, internal speech as if it were your
public speech. They try to subject you to all the ignorance and
"political correctness" and everything else that someone at a podium
in a public place might be subjected to. The sadist nanny state is not
just concerned with what you say in your own home, they want to regulate what
you think inside your head also. That can really cause your "moron
anticipator" thought pattern to distract from your normal private
thinking, because you cannot even think your private thoughts without knowing
they will be "reviewed" for you by rapist morons.
First of all, the victim is under constant surveillance. The victim
is harassed overtly and covertly, on the street and on internet, etc.
Taunting, goading, "Marco Polo" can you catch me shit. Often arrogant and even incompetent at their vile torture
"jobs" despite using the most advanced technology to commit treason.
The victim is purposely isolated.
The victim is zapped inside his or her home (or deception operation is
launched for the victim to think that is what is happening).
The victim's mind is under assault with voice projection, voice
cloning.
The technology for thought inference does exist, but it is important to
keep in mind the ways in which magician-like deception operations can be
applied to a person to make it seem to them that their mind is being
read. While some victims' thoughts are read, all of these techniques have
likely been tested on nonconsenting American
citizens. The classic example is where the "magician" first
subliminally "inserts" a thought into a victims
brain and then later the magician "reveals" what the person was
thinking. By waving his hands and strongly suggesting to the victim that
his thoughts are being read, the victim sees the phony "evidence" and
tends to believe that is what is happening. The outrage, indignation, and
terror responses the victim is feeling will also tend to interfere with his or
her reasoning processes. Advanced profiling and prediction, based on
standard surveillance techniques, is another possible means for deceiving a
person into thinking their mind is being read. While some victims have
undoubtedly had such deceptions inflicted on them, the black budget torturers
will likely try to claim this is what was done in all cases -- before they will
admit the true extent of technological advancement. Purposefully setting
up the illusion of mind reading on a victim, though, is every bit as despicable
and criminal as actually doing it.
The setup for the elementary example above can be carried out with only a
basic voice-to-skull projection device with the victim in range for some period
of time. Suppose you wanted the victim to think about blue violets, for
example. You could beam at the victim very quiet suggestions of
"blue violet." You could send them a song that they thought
just got stuck in their heads. You could use voice cloning technology and
try to fake their own voice in their head. Another technique is to
transmit a word or phrase that is closely associated with what you want the
victim to think about or do, and let their brain's associative memory do the
rest. Now, the tension and drama build until the sadist magician
culminates this particular deception operation against the mark (a.k.a. human
being). The magician sends an email to, say, a public mailing list the
victim is known to read. In the text of the message the magician works in
the phrase "blue violet" -- perhaps combined with a subtle threat.
This example is only the most elementary, of course. What if two
victims were interacting, how could a pair of them be
manipulated? The variations include two nonconsensual victims, or a
consensual harasser messing with a nonconsensual victim. There are also
witting and unwitting victims; some have figured out parts of what is going on
(intended or not) while others have not. Some have been purposely duped
into misinterpreting what is going on -- they may think they are psychic, for
example. What about wide-field projection devices? If two
interacting people are given the same subliminal stimuli, how might they
interpret it? If you weren't paying close attention, would you know if
you were the sender or the receiver? Especially if the manipulation
continued for a long period without your awareness, perhaps even from
childhood. When PTSD is purposely induced, the victim is that much more
susceptible. Then you can consider the case where there are far more than
two victims interacting: a society of would-be slavemasters
and those they would hold as slaves.
There are many, many different scenarios. I even considered writing
an academic paper on the topic, something like "Mind Control Games People
Play." Suppose you assume a particular set of technologies is
available. What logically follows from that? It is like science
fiction except that the reality these days is beyond science fiction. The
military might call it wargaming. It is amazing
the hideous sorts of operations that are possible with only your basic secret
video/audio surveillance of an individual. Now assume that a targetable voice projection device exists. What could
the people controlling it do in the worst case? What sorts of deceptions
could they carry out? What countermeasures could be adopted? When
it does exist and the consequences are so far-reaching, isn't it unconscionable
to leave the public in the dark about it? Could a politician resist
abusing this secret power?
I earlier discussed the technique whereby Nazi pigs beam words and voices
into the mind of the victims in order to harass and torture them. This
requires too many low-level
The autopig at its simplest is just a digital
recorder that sends fixed "messages" to the victims at random
times. This is very similar to Cameron's psychic driving torture that he
inflicted on people coming in for psychiatric health care. I sometimes
call these random pulses Bergeron pulses after Vonnegut's short story
"Harrison Bergeron" (not the movie, which is good but different from
the short story). In the story all people were forced to be
"equal" by handicapping those with exceptional abilities, and strong
thinkers had to wear a device which would periodically send a loud tone to the
person to disrupt their thought stream. Of course an autopig
could also be used as a computer-aided torture device so a human torturer could
switch between victims, secure in knowing that none of them was being left
alone in their "private" minds. The Delgado part comes in when
the device gets feedback from the victim's brain and sends an
"appropriate" message. That is, the sensor system analyzes the
brain rape data, an AI-like algorithm decides what sort of response to send to
the victim, and then the digital voice simulator constructs it and sends
it. Thus each victim has his or her own "electric fence" or
something like the invisible fencing they use on dogs but more technologically
sophisticated.
For the purposes of the rest of this essay I will assume our composite
victim has been "injected" or implanted somehow with a "brain
bug" that transmits tracking information as well as audio and video of the
sights and sounds the nonconsenting victim
experiences. This is something like an advanced form of the CIA's
"Acoustic Kitty" project from the 1960s, where a cat was wired up as
a motor-controlled listening device to be used in spying. The difference
is many years of technological refinement -- integrated circuits were not even
available then, let alone nano-scale devices -- and
the obvious difference that a human being is being tortured. I assume
that this device can also inject sounds which the victim perceives as if he or
she "heard" or "thought" them in internal speech.
This is somewhat less control than what some victims report experiencing, but
nonetheless is sufficient to illustrate most of the methods. Even if such
devices are not available to some particular group, variations of most of the
techniques can be created by lower-tech methods like standard surveillance
devices and external "zapping" or voice projection devices which are
publicly known to exist. The point is not the particular technological
implementation, but what the victim experiences.
Data Analysis Under Torture
Now that I have described the basic mind control operation, in this
section I consider the problem of data analysis for a victim of such
crimes. Don't blame the victim; try to understand the hideous position
they were thrown into and which they in no way got to choose. Naive
science-dude has probably not spent 5 minutes considering what victims are
forced to agonize over for years. The situation is closer to game theory
with a malicious "opponent" rather than to the usual study of natural
science, where natural phenomena are considered to be repeatable (or at least
indifferent).
The victims must rely mostly on their own sensations and introspection;
that is just the nature of this sort of advanced, secret torture. That is
not to say that evidence of the "ordinary" sorts of harassment should
not be collected, or that a breakthrough will not occur and someone will learn
how to detect whatever signals or devices are used to inflict the mind control
torture and make it available to the victims. The first challenge for the
victim, though, is just to figure out what is really going on. Many do
not even have the language to describe what is happening to them. They
have to see beyond the stagecraft ("tradecraft") of the Nazi
technical illusionists. The victims need to live their lives each day
with whatever mental firewall countermeasures they can adopt in their
minds. Beyond this they can gather evidence to convince other people or
for a lawsuit. They will discover, though, that for the time being the
court system, like the psychiatric system, is part of the problem.
How many times do they have to beam a clearly external voice into your
head before you have to question all your thoughts? Not too many times,
once really. Some victims of this "one-shot" voice projection
mind control may still suffer for years. When will you believe they are
not reading your thoughts or that they are not trying to manipulate you?
When the truth commission reveals the crimes? No, you will never believe
them again once you know how the pigs operate. Most victims suffer from
far more than just one voice projection experience, though.
One thing that the mind controllers do -- and which manipulators and
propagandists have done for all time -- is to exploit weaknesses in human
reasoning. The brain is a fantastic, beautiful organ of the human body;
no human being on the earth should ever be tortured. But humans also tend
to have some weaknesses in evaluating data compared to, say, a
mathematical algorithm. One difficulty lies in dealing with
uncertainty. The mind control victim is literally overwhelmed with
uncertainty and must sort things out as best as he or she can. The victim
has to consider every weird thing that has ever happened to him or her, whether
it is related, and knowing that the mind rapists will see this thought process
and try to reinforce any misconceptions. Another difficulty is dealing
with distractions, especially when they come in on a hostile "channel"
that the brain was never meant to be accessed on. Proportionality and
scale are another difficulty, and people tend to think binary rather than
continuous, and one-dimensional rather than multi-dimensional. Finally,
in a social sense, people are very bad at dealing with big lies, i.e.,
conspiracies of liars.
Inside the mind, the torture victims really are human beings just like
everyone else (even though they are treated worse than anyone would treat a
dog). They see with their eyes, hear with their ears, etc., have internal
dialogues thinking about things, sparks of intuition, and all the usual
features of the human mind. As mentioned earlier, these are the processes
the mind controllers attempt to hijack. For the victims we can consider that
their thoughts fall into three categories: internals, conditioned
internals, and externals. An internal is a normal, natural thought
grounded in external sensory input that the person consensually engages
in. An external is a nonconsensual input, like Cameron's psychic driving
where a person is strapped down and forced to listen to manipulative recording
loops. In the modern sense, the externals are the voices projected into a
person's mind from an external source. (You can have consensual externals,
even of this sort, but the victims certainly never saw a consent form and you'd
be a fool to consent to having the pigs the victims are familiar with have
anything to do with your mind.) An external could also be something like
a programmed autopig chip in the head. An
external could also be something like an email from a Nazi that is based on
mind raped data.
A conditioned internal, in the sense being discussed here, is an internal
thought process that is a direct result of the torture by externals. The
mental "fruit of the poisoned tree," so to speak. After a week
or so of having "you are a good marine" drilled into your head from
nonconsensual externals, then when the machine is turned off there will likely
still be the tendency to hear the phrase. This is especially true if the
conditioning was specifically focused on certain stimuli -- though random
stimuli also become conditioned in the same way that a bell ring is associated
to the bowl of food by the salivating dog. Conditioning during trauma is also
strong and long-lasting and can bring back vivid feelings of the original
torture experience.
In evaluating uncertain data it is important to calibrate the expected
level of background noise. If you are reading the torture between the
lines, you also need to keep your head and not go off on too much unconnected
symbolism. Keep this in mind when reading items that truly could not
possibly relate to you or your situation. That gives you an idea of the
basic background level for symbols, etc., to appear.
Keep a threshold and discard any questionable data. The good data points
tend to be frequent enough, and at some point even they do not tell you much
you do not already know.
Suppose you cursed the pigs, just in your head, sometimes. If you
get them angry they sometimes screw up. Say you were taunting them by
asking them whether they picked up your thoughts in
The way to think of a nonconsensual external is as an advanced cattle
prod that can be modulated in various ways to cause you pain. The
modulation happens to be with words or clicks, but that is secondary. It
is a modulated cattle prod. Notice it and try to get a feel for the
nature and source of the signal. Where does it seem to be coming
from? What is the quality of the signal? Later you can analyze the psyop sentence the pigs modulated onto the rape signal if
you feel like it. That may reveal more about the pigs than about
you. You might keep a rough histogram count on the autopig
phrases, for example. Does the signal ever have a foreign accent or speak
a foreign language? Probably not. But
basically understand that the Nazi pigs are complete, pathological liars.
If they flatter you one second they'll kick you in the head three beats later,
you can almost count on it. Pathological liars only tell the nominal
truth as part of a larger lie, and the purpose is to destroy your mental
well-being and your life.
Don't debate the autopig (or the realtime idiot). Even if it's easy.
[Unless you feel like it.]
For an illustration of what the realtime idiot
"seems like," consider a secret studio like at a radio station.
The "DJs" in this case are the rapists who sit and listen to the
raped thoughts of the victims. They also sit at a microphone where they
can "converse" with the unfortunate victims in realtime,
who hear the voice in their heads. Perhaps the rapists also have a
virtual reality computer display of everything the victim is doing at the time,
or even a display of exactly what the victim "sees" through his or
her eyes. Any thoughts the victim has, the realtime
idiots try to pretend it is like a conversation with them. You could not
think a rhetorical question to yourself in your own private thoughts without
the realtime idiot's comments. You could not
pause for a moment of silent mental reflection. They comment on things,
they harass, they goad, they distract, they try to issue "commands,"
they attempt to demean the victims ("Go brush your teeth"). This all while the victim tries to live his or her regular,
"ordinary" life and interact in the phony society. The
manipulators can probably get some unwitting victims to march around their own
homes like controlled robots. People's sensitivity to what is internal or
external in their head probably varies according to the person. Age,
length of abuse, and the particular technology and techniques used would also
influence who becomes "witting nonconsensual." Those
susceptible to hypnosis might be especially vulnerable. Perhaps this is a
part of what determines who they harass and try to "break" and who
they secretly control. (Is it terrorism to call for blowing up a Nazi
torture center that "doesn't exist"?)
The protocol. What is the cosine of
1999? The first four digits after the decimal.
If the pigs cannot send that data they are either retarded or engaging in a
conspiracy. There are a couple of other possibilities, including pure
internals, but the point is to have a cryptographic protocol challenge to verify
a pure external. Anyone can punch the buttons 1, 9, 9, 9, cos on a calculator. I do not know the answer, but I
can check it easily. [You should change the number 1999 to something else
for your own protocol, since you want to be able to conclude a pure external read
and send. The number is something you only think "to yourself,"
and choose a new challenge number each time you check one.] They never
send valid four-digit numeric data, let alone the correct answer. They do
send numerics, though, and could presumably program
the answer into the autopig. And they get
sloppy sometimes and you get a good strong piece of data that indicates
external reads and sends, even though they do not send the protocol. This
is one reason such a protocol is useful: It illustrates what the ideal
data would look like for a remote read and send, and can help clarify more
ambiguous situations. But keep in mind possible magician-like deceptions
as were mentioned earlier.
Understand aggregate statistics. You can sometimes reason better
with them. As an example, you know that there are some people in the
world you can trust; you just don't know exactly which ones they are. You
can often estimate aggregate statistics better since if you get one wrong here
or there it all averages out. Suppose you estimate, based on a great deal
of data, that posters on some mailing list are, say, 40% agents and
provocateurs, 35% real victims and activists, 15% who probably consider
themselves scientific, nonsuperstitious thinkers
looking for the truth, and another 10% who are unclassifiable. There are
some who you are sure enough about to not worry with percentages, but in
general any particular person on that list is "suspect."
Nonetheless, the list can still function as a way to reach and connect the 35%
of mind control victims and activists. It may also serve as a way to
convince and educate some of the actual open-minded decent people who are not
mind control victims. Another use of aggregate statistics is to reason
from historical records. We know that there are thousands of mind control
victims in the population, at the least. We just do not know which
particular people claiming to be victims are the actual victims (or which still
unwitting people were/are victims). Never forget the humanity of the real
human beings involved, though.
[But science is bad religion. A modern religious man who is
ignorant of science is not a good thing, but a scientist who is ignorant of
religion -- in the real sense rather than in terms of the narrow political crap
fashionable in
Try tuning out the pigs like you might cure yourself of hiccups. It
might work, or at least help you train yourself to ignore the pigs.
Notice the nature and source of the signals, the mental gnats meant to annoy
you. Parasitic mind fleas. If you think
like the monkey, you'll be as dumb as the monkey. If
you watch that TV too much you'll be as dumb as the morons on it.
They will entertain you right into digging your own grave.
The Asymmetry of Dignity
You are a human being with unalienable human rights. Unalienable
means that they cannot be taken away. They can be violated, infringed,
ignored, and even legislated away, but the acts of a tyrant do not change the
fact that you are a human being with unalienable human rights. This means
that the tyrant is always a tyrant, and remains a tyrant, to meet the fate of
tyrants. This is a fundamental asymmetry between the citizen and the
tyrant.
Torture demeans the torturer. The dignity of the torture victim
cannot be taken away by the torturer, but the act of torture destroys the
dignity of the torturer. This is not enough punishment for such hideous
crimes, but gives cause to pity the torturer even as you work to hang the
pig. Let me explain about what I mean about justice for the victims of
these treasonous Nazis, who commit crimes against their fellow American
citizens in peacetime which would be war crimes even against an enemy in
warfare. Under a legitimate government such people would be receive life
sentences in a humane prison system. That would be my preference, but the
You have absolute free mentation in your brain
and mind. Your freedom of thought is unalienable.
Nazi Pig Theorem
The adjective Auschwitz-level to describe these crimes is not
hyperbole. If you do not feel like you need to vomit you probably do not
really understand the full sickness of mind control crimes. Gordon
Thomas wrote in the preface to his book Journey Into
Madness: The True Story of CIA Mind Control and Medical Abuse:
In working on this book I have
had to come to terms with my own emotions -- disbelief, bewilderment, disgust,
and anger and, more than once in the early stages, a feeling that the subject
was simply too evil to cope with. Nothing I had researched before could
have prepared me for the dark reality of doctors who set out to deliberately
destroy minds and bodies they were trained to heal.
Torturers can never blame their victims, though they invariably try.
This brings me to what I refer to as the Nazi Pig Theorem (NPT).
Strictly speaking it is a metaphorical axiom, but it can be very useful to the
torture victim. It basically asserts that if you act like Mengele then you are a Nazi pig. Then there are a few
obvious conclusions that are also part of the "theorem."
|
The Nazi Pig Theorem (NPT): Anyone
who nonconsensually violates your brain/mind/mentation using Mengele-like
methods is a Nazi pig. You do not care what a Nazi pig thinks.
You do not care a Nazi pig's opinions. You do not respond to a Nazi pig
ridiculing you, threatening you, trying to distract you, or otherwise trying
to manipulate you. You work to get a Nazi pig hanged. |
Isn't that obvious? Don't you believe it? Then remember it
and act like you know it. The contrapositive of
the NPT is also useful: If they are not Nazi pigs then they are not raping your
brain. So you can think anything about anyone; it's just you and the
Nazis in your mind, and their opinions do not matter
at all. If you have a passing thought about someone and the Nazis try to
harass you with it or make you feel guilty about it, it does not matter.
The Nazi pigs' opinions do not matter (unless they help get the pigs
hanged). If you think some thought about someone who really is raping your
brain, then you have some worse things to think about that Nazi piece of human
garbage than what floated through your brain originally. Don't explain to
the Nazi pigs, it is better if they misunderstand what they rape from you.
One use of the Nazi Pig Theorem is to try to go on with ordinary life
even as you are being tortured and you know the real, evil nature of the
society you are living in. Spend some time each day working for justice,
and the rest of the time try to ignore the Nazi pigs and get on with your life
as best as you can. My philosophy is basically to wish people well, and
any differences I have had with people are all water under the bridge after not
too long. But atrocities never, ever pass under the bridge. The victims
never forget, and should never forget. Of course any victim is free to
choose to forgive his or her torturers, but for torturers to lecture their victims about forgiveness is the "Christianity" of
the oppressor. Forgiveness also does not preclude justice.
The unfortunate reality is that when dealing with anyone, they are either
a Nazi or a non-Nazi. Torture makes it that clear. This is the top
node of the decision tree for the torture victim, and it is a stark
split. The following diagram illustrates the split:
That is clear enough. Of course the difficult part is that you do
not know exactly who is a Nazi pig and who is not. So you might start off
with a reasonable benefit of the doubt and collect evidence from there to
update your current assumptions. But how do you deal with someone you
think has a 10% chance of being a Nazi pig? How do you deal with someone
you think has an 80% chance of being a Nazi pig? That is your own
utility/decision function and is not easy. People have to make decisions
based on imperfect information all the time, but this purposefully inflicted
torture pushes it past what people are accustomed to have to deal with in
ordinary situations. Nonetheless, the government is accountable for the
aggregate situation where torture occurs regularly and systematically in
American society.
The NPT is your firewall. The external firewall theorem states that
you do not care in the slightest bit what Mengele
thinks. Analyze the external incomings for evidence and nature and source
if you must, and then send them straight to your mental /dev/null. You
then work each day to get the pigs hanged in the real world, in the best way
you can figure to do it (see Part II). There is also an internal firewall
theorem: Your brain is your own to think whatever you want with.
Simply invoke IFT and think about something entirely different if you are
thinking something that you don't want to be thinking about. Train
yourself toward that, at any rate.
How Can a Society I Detest Defile Me?
How do you deal with a secrecy-bred society of dumb-as-cows
"innocent" people, Nazi pigs, and victims? Or the collaborators, apologists, and profiteers? What
about the people who idiotically ask, "Why are you ongoing torture victims
so obsessed with your torture (and human rights, etc.)?" The social
system where no one can talk about the elephant in the living room, even though
many people know at least that something is there. Did people not get
born with tongues to speak with? Or is this a conspiracy of idiots and
cowards? What the hell is wrong with these people? Is it still that
old pig slaver mentality, or the ability to look away from such abominations as
an everyday thing?
Every day for the mind control victims, it is like the rape victim who
has to go out and interact in the society where her rapist is still at
large. The difference is that there is a whole conspiracy of rapists and
they rape the victims each and every day. So perhaps it is closer to
"comfort girls." How do you think it feels to wake up with a
pig in your head? Is that the only alternative to being dumb as a cow and
wearing a gag in this society? The "consensus reality" of the
average citizen is far, far from the real truth on the ground.
Americans are the best liars and biggest hypocrites on the planet.
They will probably even be flattered by that description. They love being
number one, after all. Hypocrisy is like lies, in the sense that there is
ordinary hypocrisy and there is big hypocrisy. If you credibly call an
American a big-sense hypocrite they will often start spewing propaganda that
celebrates ordinary, everyday hypocrisy like not telling someone their new
haircut looks bad. Americans want to be both peepers and prudes, they
want to rig the game and call it free enterprise, and they want to be known for
freedom and liberty regardless of any domestic atrocities they commit.
You can never un-torture someone.
If people are capable of outrage there will be far fewer outrages.
How dare those pigs do that to anybody.
If it's not useful or enjoyable or necessary, it's a worthless thought.
Zap it out of existence with IFT and think something else.
Truly internal, self-mind control is a good thing; external nonconsensual mind
control is Mengele-like torture.
No nens follow from nonconsensual externals, except
perhaps one to put it in the trash can
or a few to analyze it for evidence, nature and
source.
But think anything you want. I curse the pigshit
Nazis sometimes.
Focus your anger.
Ah, how sad it is, Auchwitz in the
springtime...
One springtime
after another
--
You will feel stronger some days, fatigued others
If this essay helps you, read it again when you need a reminder
The Nazi harassment never reflects on you
Psychic Powers and Mind Control
Sidebar to Part III: Mental Firewalls
Allen Barker,
There are a good number of people in society who think they have psychic
powers. Even though a psychiatrist might call this schizotypal, or perhaps a belief in special powers, that is
only the bad religion of psychology. The truth is that no one
really knows. From my point of view people can hold whatever religious
beliefs or beliefs about the world that they choose to hold. I personally
do not believe it, but there is a small chance that there are some of what are
called "psychic" powers. I think though, that people often do
not understand their own intuition and the nature of time. That and an
old-fashioned Nazi conspiracy explain what I see in the world. Given that
plenty of decent people hold the view that there truly are psychic powers,
though, this sidebar is about how that relates to mind control. Please
understand that the issues of technological mind control do not go away or
really change according to whether or not there are "natural" psychic
powers.
First of all, psychic powers and ESP are the perfect psyop
distractions from mind control. You rape someone's brain all the while
telling him or her that it is a "natural phenomenon." If the
victim buys it, you have a cooperating, though duped, subject. A victim
who complains of electronic harassment and surveillance might be dismissed by
some as just a "psychic harassment victim." Besides acting as a
distraction from the issues of people being tortured, talk about psychic
phenomena serves to discredit those who do so publicly. This is because of the
ridicule that goes along with the subject among those who decide what others are
allowed to think. Another very important point is that psychic phenomena
can serve as a cover lie for the testing of electronic and other mind control
weapons, devices, and techniques. That may make the population of people
who think they have psychic powers especially vulnerable to the predators who
scour the domestic population for human beings to test weapons on.
Let me assume, for the remainder of this sidebar, that there are some
psychic phenomena and consider what follows from that. Consider a form of
weak telepathy, for example. We know it is either weak or else there is a
huge conspiracy of psychics trying to hide their powers. Consider the
authentication protocol from the main essay, "What is the cos(1999)."
Suppose Joe across town is psychic. Can he not receive such a simple
message and manage to transmit back four digits? I have not seen any
evidence of any such useful or verifiable information. I can easily send
the same message in email, though, and soon will be able to have a device in my
eyeglasses to do it from anywhere. But an interesting point which arises
is that at the abstract, mathematical level both "natural" and
technological methods of telepathy or remote knowledge work out about the
same. We're only haggling implementation and strength. But the
basic nature of the human mind and communication stay the same, as do in fact
most experimental techniques one might use to test for either.
Clandestine mind control research should concern psychics
even more than ordinary citizens. Many psychics would like some
scientific proof of the existence of such phenomenon. But when Nazis are
on the rampage with technological methods of mind control, such experiments are
essentially worthless. The experimental design has not ruled out such
technological interference, influencing the results either one way or the
other.
On a more sinister note, it is naive to assume -- if there truly are
useful and powerful psychic powers -- that the secret government labs have not
been all over them for years. The black budget labs would have dissected
all sorts of "psychics" by now, making measurements all the time in
order to technologically mimic what the psychic accomplishes. It is not
magic. It may not be describable by current "open" physics but
it is not magic. So if we suppose it is not magic then one has to wonder
what sort of progress has been made in secret and how that knowledge is being
used. What if it were politically desirable to "jam the
psychics"? To keep them from thinking in their
natural mode of thought. The human brain can only put out less
than a watt or so of power. Your outlets in your home deliver far more,
and a secret transmitter somewhere could put out gigawatts.
(And does electropollution have any bearing on this?)
Suppose that even more progress was made than just finding the mode of
transmission and a method for jamming it. Suppose the actual modulation
method of such transmissions were discovered, as well as how to generate
them. Then what you have is a bunch of people hardwired to receive
relatively weak transmissions which go straight to the core of the
psyche. What better mind control method? It was already there in
the first place, it just had to be hijacked by Nazis and employed against the
natural psychic community. You would end up with the usual
"natural" psychic signals but with a stronger technological signal
superimposed over it. A technician wearing a psychic amplifier (or with
such a device implanted) could outpower all the
natural psychics.
Taking this a step further, a government could deploy its new
hypothetical EWAR psychic phenomena detectors and track down the sources of
psychic emissions. These would be human beings, of course, with a GPS
lock on their body's location.
Even if we consider that the "mystical method of psychic
transmission" has not been, or maybe even cannot be, analyzed and reverse
engineered into technology, there is still the issue of the weaponization
of psychic space to deal with. It is no secret that governments have
researched this area for some time, perhaps as more than just a psyop distraction. Some of the details of things like
"remote viewing" that have come out are ridiculous, like where a
subject is given a seemingly random integer "coordinate" and somehow
knows what location that corresponds to here on the rotating earth spinning
through the solar system. (Perhaps the integer is really the label of the
technological experiment being conducted...) But let me continue to
assume that there is some real natural phenomenon there.
Those who torture human beings by utilizing psychic space are every bit
as bad as those who would do it with technology. One can hope that some
more mystical spaces can take care of themselves, for example that the
threefold law would be descriptive of what happens to those who use psychic
space to inflict harm. Nonetheless, if that law ever once held it
may need some extra help these days.
That is about all I have to discuss on the issue of psychic phenomena, so
I will end with a list of a few things I ponder sometimes when I assume the
hypothesis that "natural" psychic phenomena are real.
· Are
natural psychics afraid to talk about the experiences? "Hey, I just
heard someone think X, did anyone else? Send or receive?" A
few people discuss such things but if the phenomenon were widespread then that
leaves many people not talking. Is there a conspiracy of idiots?
Are some people unwitting psychics, perhaps not consciously or verbally in
touch with it?
· What
about the people locked up in mental wards because they claimed their thoughts
were being broadcast or that they could pick up telepathic messages? Are
some of these people really psychic? Wouldn't that be a human rights
violation? Does no one care?
· What
a luxury it would be to worry just about natural psychic phenomena if you were
under technological electronic harassment.
· Just
like with a wide-field technological device sending to many people, would you
know if you were sending or receiving? Would you know
if the guy next to you was sending or receiving, or if you were both receiving
the same signal?
· If
psychic phenomena do exist, does time have any bearing in that domain like we
expect? How would you know it is not a dead person or a person from the
future you are connecting with?
· Wouldn't
it be presumptuous to get a little psychic glimpse of someone's mind and think
you really knew anything about them or what their thoughts meant or what they
were going through?
· If
the "power to read men's minds" is so valuable, why does the psychic
work stocking shelves in a department store? Not that that isn't valuable
and honorable work, but why not poker championships? Why not other
applications of the talent?
· If
only certain people's minds can be read, perhaps it is their talent to
"transmit thoughts into your mind" rather than yours to "read
men's minds."
· Doesn't
it seem like a connection such as a psychic link would make people more
compassionate and empathetic?
· Could the people in Nazi Germany
hear the psychic cries of a room full of men, women, and children being gassed
to death in what they were told was going to be a shower? Did the slaveowners have psychic connections with the slaves they
degraded and demeaned each day? Were they entertained?
Disgusted? What did they feel?
[END]