INTRODUCTION TO THE BOOKS OF THE KINGS
The books which we know as
First and Second Kings record the history of
TITLE OF THE BOOKS.
1. Hebrew
Title: Meleckim (“Kings”).
It
was a single book. The division was
simply for the sake of convenience. Even
the location for the division is somewhat arbitrary as it divides in the middle
of the ministry of Elijah.
Josephus
says that in his day it was understood that there were 24 books in the Old
Testament.
a. The
Minor Prophets counted as a single book.
b. Lamentations
was a single book.
c. Ruth
was been with Judges
d. Samuel
and Kings were each a single book.
Though
they are counted differently, these are the same books that constitute our Old
Testament. Note that the Apocrypha was
not considered to be a part of the Hebrew canon, even though the Jews possessed
these additional books and accorded them with being worthy of study.
2. Greek
Title: Basileion (“Kingdoms”).
Kings
appears in the Septuagint as part of a 4-part set.
Greek Title |
English Equivalent |
1st Book of Kingdoms |
1st Samuel |
2nd Book of Kingdoms |
2nd Samuel |
3rd Book of Kingdoms |
1st Kings |
4th Book of Kingdoms |
2nd Kings |
3. Latin
Vulgate: Liber Regum Tertius et
Quartus.
Our English Bibles have the fourfold
division of Samuel and Kings found in the Septuagint, but with the Hebrew
titles.
UNITY OF THE BOOKS
The books which we know as
1st and 2nd Kings were originally written to be a single work. The author is unnamed in the book, as is the
case with most Old Testament historical narrative. He mentions using several source documents,
three specifically:
1. The
book of the annals of Solomon (1 Kings 11:41).
2. The
book of the annals of the kings of
3. The
book of the annals of the kings of
There is also an obvious
quotation from three chapters of Isaiah (Isaiah 37-39) which appear verbatim in
2 Kings 19:1 - 20:19.
AUTHORSHIP
The author of the book is
nowhere named in Scripture. Jewish
tradition had it that Jeremiah was the author.
1. There
is a similarity of Jeremiah 52 with 2 Kings 24‑25.
2. The
writer seems to have been an eye witness to the fall of
3. There
is a similarity of writing styles, as well as the same air of despondency and
hopelessness.
4. It is noteworthy
that there is no mention of Jeremiah within the books of Kings.
5. If
Jeremiah is the author, then the historical abstracts at the end of 2 Kings
(Gedaliah, governor of
6. The
author of Kings does not use the familiar names for the kings of
TEXTUAL CRITICISM AND THE
BOOKS OF KINGS
Textual criticism is the
study of the ancient manuscripts to learn which is the true text. It asks the question: “What did the original text say?” There are two primary textual sources for the
Books of the Kings.
a. The
Massoretic Text.
The
Massoretes were Jewish scholars who worked at preserving the Hebrew Bible. They passed on a system of vowel pointing
that was not found in the original text.
The text that they have preserved dates to around 1000 A.D.
b. The
Septuagint.
This
was the Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures. According to tradition, it was the work of 72
men translating in the days of Ptolemy Philadelphus (284-247 B.C.). Our earliest copies of the Septuagint date to
the 4th or 5th centuries A.D.
The discovery of the Dead Sea
Scrolls has uncovered manuscript fragments of a Hebrew text which often follows
the Septuagint reading rather than that of the Massoretic Text. The Dead Sea Scrolls were penned prior to
A.D. 70. It should be noted that, while
there are variations between the Massoretic Text and the Dead Sea Scrolls,
these are relatively few and tend to be in the area of numbers and occasionally
in the spelling of names.
DEVELOPING A CHRONOLOGY OF
KINGS
The books of Samuel and Kings
cover the historical period from Samuel to the Exile into
1st Samuel |
2nd Samuel |
1 Kings |
2 Kings |
Samuel &
Saul |
Saul &
David |
Solomon &
Divided Kingdom |
Fall of the
Divided Kingdoms |
The narrative runs smoothly
in 1 Kings 1-11 because we are following the history of only one kingdom. But from 1 Kings 12 - 2 Kings 17 the author
deals with both the Northern Kingdom of Samaria and the Southern Kingdom of
Judah, shifting back and forth between these two. After 2 Kings 17 and the fall of the
1 Kings 1-11 |
1 Kings 12 - 2
Kings 17 |
2 Kings 18-25 |
|
|
|
Southern |
1. Old Testament
writers did not use a universal reference point in establishing dates. Instead, they used various sorts of regnal
dating methods (“In the 4th year of Hezekiah...”). This makes it difficult to be exact in
establishing dates for Old Testament events.
2. Regnal
Reckoning.
The
first year of a king might refer to the first year in which he served as regent
or it might refer to his first year upon the throne. This leads to the possibility of differing
dates when we try to calculate the length of the reigns of the various kings of
3. Accession
versus Non-accession Year Reckoning.
Accession Year Reckoning |
Accession Year |
1st Year |
2nd Year |
Non-Accession Year Reckoning |
1st Year |
2nd Year |
3rd Year |
Both
types of reckoning were used in ancient times to determine which year it might
be. Furthermore, in the Non-Accession
Method, the last year of one ruler would be the same as the first official year
of his successor. Such a year would
count twice.
Edwin
Thiele (“A Chronology of the Hebrew Kings”) suggests that these two
differing systems were used at different times in
|
Accession Year Dating |
Non-Accession Year Dating |
Accession Year Dating |
|
Rehoboam to
Jehoshophat |
Jehoram to
Joash |
Amaziah to
Zedekiah |
|
- |
Jeroboam to
Jehoahaz |
Jehoash to
Hoshea |
4. The
Assyrian Eponym List.
It
was the custom in
The
Assyrians also included records of solar eclipses - Total eclipses were visible
in
CONTRAST OF KINGS WITH
CHRONICLES
The relationship of Kings to
Chronicles is similar to the relationship of the Synoptic Gospels to the Gospel
of John.
Kings |
Relates
historical fact with little commentary |
Synoptic
Gospels |
Chronicles |
Tells meaning
of the fact |
John |
Kings relates the political
and royal fortunes of the nation while Chronicles focuses upon the sacred and
ecclesiastical aspects of the nation.
Kings |
Chronicles |
Prophetic Perspective:
Judgments |
Priestly Perspective: Hope |
Wars are prominent |
|
History of the thrones |
Continuity of the Davidic
line |
Record of both |
Mostly |
Morality |
Redemption |
There is also a difference in
the historical scope of what is covered in each of these two books. Chronicles begins by going all the way back
to Adam and giving the genealogy of the line of
|
|
1st Chronicles |
1 Adam (Genealogies) |
|
|
|
|
10 Reign of
David |
|
1st Kings |
1 Reign of
Solomon |
2nd Chronicles |
1 Reign of
Solomon |
|
|
12 Jeroboam |
Divided
Kingdom |
|
10 Focus on the
Southern |
|
17 Elijah &
Ahab |
|
||
2nd Kings |
1 Elijah
& Ahaziah |
|
||
|
2 Elisha |
|
||
|
17 Fall of |
|
||
|
18 Hezekiah |
|
|
|
|
25 Babylonian
Captivity |
Exile |
|
|
|
|
36:22 Return from |
PURPOSE OF KINGS
To understand the purpose of
this book, one must first understand the date and circumstances of its writing.
It is written in the
Captivity. The author has just seen the
final remnant of the nation of
1. To
Answer the Question: “How did we get
here?”
The
Northern Kingdom of Israel has long ago been taken into captivity. The Southern Kingdom of Judah is now in its
own captivity. It seems as though the promises
of God have failed. What went
wrong? This book answers that question.
2. To
Give a Warning of the Consequences of Sin.
This
book tells of the disastrous consequences of
Return to Stevenson Bible Study Page