Vol I THE JOSHUA REPORT No. #22
 

"In the beginning GOD CREATED
the HEAVEN and the EARTH."
- Genesis 1:1

PART 1b of 5
INVESTIGATING the DEATH
of AMERICA: Was it MURDER?

[KILLING THE CONSTITUTION: Step #2
On The PATH to DESTRUCTION]

Well, there's no stopping it now: AMERICA'S ANTICHRIST [No. Not THE
Antichrist] has officially booked us on the EXPRESSWAY TO HELL - with a stopover at
ARMAGEDDON. But, WHY? Is this just another coverup for something more nefarious? Is
it HIS idea - or is he just FOLLOWING ORDERS? What IS Clinton's [i.e., THEIR] secret
[REAL] agenda? Could they be following a SECRET PLAN? Let's go back in history and
see what we can find out:

Let's start with HOW DID WE LOSE OUR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM? Doesn't the
FIRST AMENDMENT protect that? Oh, that's right! I forgot: We must protect the STATE
from those Bible-thumping, far-right, CHRISTIAN radicals! But, wait a minute! The FIRST
AMENDMENT says absolutely NOTHING about "SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE!"
[Nor does the CONSTITUTION, or the DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE] So where the
heck did THAT come from? Let's take a look: Concerned over a rumor that a particular
DENOMINATION will be recognized as the official "state church," the DANBURY BAPTIST
ASSOCIATION of Danbury, Connecticut sent a letter to President Jefferson, expressing
their fears. On January 1st, 1802, President Jefferson sent his response:

"I contemplate with solemn reverence that act of the whole American people
which declared that their legislature should 'make NO LAW respecting an establishment
of religion, or PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE thereof,' thus building a WALL OF
SEPARATION between Church and State." [1] Not being a Baptist himself, President
Jefferson chose a phrase they could identify with. The actual MEANING was quite clear:

"When they have opened a gap in the HEDGE or WALL OF SEPARATION between
the GARDEN OF THE CHURCH and the WILDERNESS OF THE WORLD, God hath ever
broke down the wall itself...And that therefore if He will eer please to restore His garden
and paradise again, it must of necessity be WALLED IN in peculiarly unto Himself FROM
THE WORLD..." [2] As historical researcher and Constitutional expert DAVID BARTON
explains:

"According to Williams, the 'WALL OF SEPARATION' is to protect the 'Garden of
the Church' from the 'Wilderness of the World.' That 'wall' is...introduced as, and
understood to be, a ONE-DIRECTIONAL wall PROTECTING THE CHURCH FROM THE
GOVERNMENT..." [NOT the State from the Church] [3] Jefferson spelled it out even more
clearly: 'In matters of religion I have considered that its FREE EXERCISE is placed by the
Constitution INDEPENDENT OF THE POWERS OF THE GENERAL [FEDERAL]
GOVERNMENT'." [4]

"I consider the government of the United States as INTERDICTED [prohibited] by
the Constitution from INTERMEDDLING WITH RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS, THEIR
DOCTRINES, DISCIPLINE, OR EXERCISES. This results not only from the provision that
no law shall be made respecting the establishment or free exercise of religion [1st
AMENDMENT], but from that also which reserves to the STATES the powers NOT
DELEGATED TO THE UNITED STATES [10th AMENDMENT]. Certainly, no power to
prescribe any religious exercise, or to assume authority in religious discipline, has been
delegated to the General Government. It must then rest with the STATES [not The
UNITED States], as far as it can be in any human authority." [5]

A LETTER???!! Our RIGHTS were stripped, our country turned into a Revived
BABYLON, and condemned to the fate of SODOM - all because of a LETTER?!!!

In 1828, the US SUPREME COURT defined ATHEISM as a RELIGION - therefore
Constitutionally-protected. The Court went so far as to demand that ATHEISM and
SECULAR HUMANISM be CO-EQUAL with CHRISTIANITY. But, the eminent and respected
NOAH WEBSTER defined "religion" totally differently than the Court's:

RE'LI'GION:
"Includes a BELIEF in the BEING AND PERFECTIONS OF GOD, in the
REVELATION OF HIS WILL to man, and in MAN'S OBLIGATION TO OBEY HIS
COMMANDS, in a state of REWARD AND PUNISHMENT, and in MAN'S
ACCOUNTABLENESS TO GOD; and also true godliness or piety of life, with the practice
of all moral duties...THE PRACTICE OF MORAL DUTIES WITHOUT A BELIEF IN A DIVINE
LAWGIVER, AND WITHOUT REFERENCE TO HIS WILL OR COMMANDS, IS NOT
RELIGION." [6] [According to the 10th Amendment, the government, i.e., Supreme Court,
was prohibited from making a decision on this subject. It was beyond their jurisdiction
and out of their sphere of expertise!]

Ever since this ruling, the NEW WORLD ORDER have been using the Court's
interpretation as A WEAPON AGAINST TRADITIONAL AMERICANS by protecting
MARXISM, SATANIC cults, as well as other religions NOT COMPATIBLE WITH
CHRISTIANITY. In addition, they have forced the ACCEPTANCE of it in SCHOOLS and all
public institutions. Yet, while forcing this "religious TOLERATION," at the same time they
are forcing SUPPRESSION of anything to do with the BIBLE or CHRISTIANITY! This is
"religious TOLERATION?"

In 1829, one year after the Supreme Court's ruling, we started down a VERY
slippery slope: An ILLUMINATI meeting was held in New York City. The purpose of the
meeting was the creation of the COMMUNIST movement, through the UNIFICATION OF
ATHEISTS AND NIHILISTS. [7] That same year, a SENATE COMMITTEE investigation in
New York discovered a CONSPIRACY to TAKE OVER THE GOVERNMENT by members of
a well-known SECRET SOCIETY:

"It comprises MEN OF RANK, WEALTH, OFFICE AND TALENTS IN POWER - and
that almost in every place where power is of any importance - it...[is] capable of being
directed by the efforts of others so as to have FORCE OF CONCERT [acting together]
through the civilized world!

"They are distributed too, with the means of KNOWING EACH OTHER, and the
means of KEEPING SECRET, and the means of COOPERATING, in the DESK, in the
LEGISLATIVE HALL, on the BENCH, in every GATHERING of MEN OF BUSINESS, in every
PARTY OF PLEASURE, in every ENTERPRISE OF GOVERNMENT, in every DOMESTIC
CIRCLE, IN PEACE and IN WAR, AMONG ITS ENEMIES and FRIENDS...it fears nothing
from violence, either public or private, for it has every means to learn it in season, to
COUNTERACT, DEFEAT and PUNISH it..." This society was abetted by a conspiracy of
the public press:

"The report estimated that there were approximately 30,000 FREEMASONS in the
State of New York - about ONE-FOURTH of the eligible voting population - 'yet THEY
HAVE HELD FOR FORTY YEARS, THREE-FOURTHS OF ALL PUBLIC OFFICES IN THE
STATE!' [!] Commenting on the enduring SILENCE OF THE PRESS, the committee stated:
'This self-proclaimed sentinel of freedom, has felt the force of MASONIC INFLUENCE, or
has been smitten with the ROD OF ITS POWER'." [8] In a letter dated May 4th, 1832, the
HONORABLE RICHARD RUSH confirmed that the fears of the ANTI-MASONIC
COMMITTEE OF YORK COUNTY were not groundless:

Gentlemen:
"I have received the communication of the 26th of April...My opinions having been
made up neither hastily nor very recently on those which your letter embraces, I willingly
proceed...I see objections to SECRET SOCIETIES, because pursuing OBJECTS NOT
KNOWN TO THE PUBLIC through MEANS NOT KNOWN TO THE PUBLIC, they act under
DIMINISHED RESPONSIBILITIES to the public...

"SOCIETIES, then, profoundly SECRET...whatever their ostensible ENDS, cannot
be too closely watched, in a country whose primary principles of social and political
action are all in the FACE OF DAY [open]. The law is...paralyzed by a HIDDEN AGENT,
that continues to prove stronger than the combined force of its [the laws] machinery and
its ministers..." [9] Rush then goes on to clarify the DANGERS Americans face, if the
"evils of Masonry" are allowed to continue unchecked:

"...If we have laws without the power to give them effect, we are in the condition
of a people HAVING NONE...the PRESS...has been shamefully silent. This best guard of a
free state...has been chained and muzzled; has been faithless; has been criminal...I do
believe the EVILS OF MASONRY to be stupendous. I must...believe that they
counterbalance, a thousand fold, any GOOD that it can achieve. We have been told that
MASONRY IS TOO STRONG to be put down. That such attempts have been made in
European countries, but have failed." [10]

An investigation in March 1834 by the MASSACHUSETTS LEGISLATURE found
MASONRY was actually a PARALLEL GOVERNMENT:

"...the Massachusetts Legislature reports that results of its...investigation of the
MASONIC 'BROTHERHOOD' finds that FREEMASONRY is 'a distinct INDEPENDENT
GOVERNMENT within our own Governement, and BEYOND THE CONTROL OF THE
LAWS of the land by means of its SECRECY, and the OATHS and REGULATIONS which
its subjects are bound to obey, under PENALTY OF DEATH.' The committee adds ''In no
MASONIC OATH presented to the committee, is there any RESERVATION made of the
CONSTITUTION and the LAWS OF THE LAND.' The Joint Committee finds Freemasonry
to be a 'MORAL EVIL,' as well as a 'POLITICAL EVIL.' " [11] [Neither does the UNITED
NATIONS OATH taken by BILL CLINTON and AL GORE! Think about THAT for awhile!]

In November 1847 the INTERNATIONAL BANKERS CARTEL, members of the
ILLUMINATI, and three of the most powerful MEDIA OWNERS at the time, CLINTON
ROOSEVELT, HORACE GREELEY and CHARLES DANA held a SECRET MEETING in New
York. They started a committee which they called the "LEAGUE OF JUST MEN" to raise
funds for their project: to unite ATHEISTS and other subversive groups into a new
international organization, called the "COMMUNIST LEAGUE." The organization's GOAL
was to SO FRIGHTEN THE REST OF THE WORLD THAT THEY WOULD GLADLY BAND
TOGETHER FOR PROTECTION AGAINST THIS NEW "EVIL EMPIRE." The LEAGUE then
hired two men in London to write up the tenants of the new organization. Their names
were KARL MARX and FREDERICK ENGELS: [12]

"The 'MANIFESTO' was published in the platform of the COMMUNIST LEAGUE, a
workingman's association...At a Congress of the LEAGUE...MARX and ENGELS were
commissioned to prepare for publication a complete theoretical and practical party
program." [13] Meanwhile, others were also intent on "frightening people into uniting
under a single front:"

"While the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO was being written, PROFESSOR KARL
RITTER of FRANKFURT UNIVERSITY began writing the plans for another
organization...Ritter died before finishing the work. (The One-World-Order conspirators)
then hired FRIEDRICH WILHELM NIETZSCHE to finish the work. He founded a movement
called NIETZSCHEISM. This movement then became FASCISM, which ultimately became
NAZISM..." [14]

"...[Nietzsche] argued that 'GOD IS DEAD' and therefore people are free to create
their own values. His ideal was the UBERMENSCH, or 'SUPERMAN,' who would IMPOSE
HIS WILL on the WEAK and WORTHLESS. Nietzsche claimed that knowledge is never
objective but always serves some interest or unconscious purpose." [15]

The following year KARL MARX's COMMUNIST MANIFESTO was released. In its
preface, Engels told his readers that SOCIALISM was a MIDDLE-CLASS movement,
whereas COMMUNISM was a WORKING-CLASS movement. He wrote that "the
emancipation of the working class must be the act of the working class itself," therefore
they chose the name of "COMMUNISM" for their manifesto. He claimed that COMMUNISM
would "...once and for all, EMANCIPATE society at large from all EXPLOITATION,
OPPRESSION, CLASS DISTINCTIONS and CLASS STRUGGLES."

In his manifesto, Marx summed up his (and the communist) PHILOSOPHY: "There
are...ETERNAL TRUTHS, such as FREEDOM, JUSTICE, etc., that are common to all states
of society. But COMMUNISM ABOLISHES ETERNAL TRUTHS...ALL RELIGION...AND ALL
MORALITY, instead of constituting them on a new basis; it therefore acts in
CONTRADICTION to all past experience." [16] Gee, Folks. How's THAT for laying your
cards on the table?!

There are TEN "MEASURES" [as MARX calls them], which COMMUNISTS must
embrace and adhere to - in order to create a "UTOPIAN SOCIETY" on earth:

1. ABOLITION OF PROPERTY in land and application of all rents of land to public
purposes; [As I pointed out a few columns ago, we already have that. Ask some of your
neighbors whose land, homes and businesses have been "CONFISCATED" by the IRS
and/or the BATF. Is YOURS next?]

2. A HEAVY PROGRESSIVE or GRADUATED INCOME TAX; [We've had this since
the 16th AMENDMENT]

3. ABOLITION of all RIGHT OF INHERITANCE; [Almost there: not only must you
pay TAXES on inheritance, but if there is no will, most - if not all - could wind up going to
the STATE]

4. CONFISCATION of the PROPERTY of all emigrants and rebels; [today we plant
or say we "found" drugs and/or money on people and call them "TERRORISTS." Then the
MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL cops get to take their property and earn a huge COMMISSION
for doing so. Not only that, but many CRIMINALS AND MOBSTERS - RECRUITED BY
CLINTON FROM OTHER COUNTRIES are then GIVEN this confiscated property, in
exchange for serving our new POLICE STATE!]

5. CENTRALIZATION OF CREDIT in the hands of the State, by means of a
NATIONAL BANK with State capital and an exclusive monopoly; [You already know this
one: the FEDERAL RESERVE]

6. CENTRALIZATION of the means of COMMUNICATION AND TRANSPORT in the
hands of the State; [You should know this one too: mandatory regulations of all
transportation and communication industries by the FAA, FCC, and the UPC - enforced by
the EPA - did YOU vote for any of these people? - and the Bar Association]

7. Extension of FACTORIES and instruments of production OWNED BY THE
STATE, the bringing into CULTIVATION OF WASTE LANDS, and the improvement of the
soil generally in accordance with a COMMON plan; [CLINTON took over the SHIPPING
and AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES when he first took office, and he's been adding to them
ever since. At that time he also began claiming our most valuable resources, i.e.,
YELLOWSTONE, UTAH COAL, ALASKA, our RIVERS and WATERWAYS, ad nauseum]

8. EQUAL LIABILITY OF ALL TO LABOR. Establishment of INDUSTRIAL ARMIES,
especially for agriculture; [Y'all ever hear of AMERICORPS, VOLUNTEER ACTION CORPS,
HABITATS FOR HUMANITY, etc., etc.?]

9. COMBINATION OF AGRICULTURE WITH MANUFACTURING with manufacturing
industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more
equitable DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION over the country; [Check under TYSON,
RALSTON-PURINA, etc., etc. - ask our one-time INDEPENDENT farmers. The latter plan is
already set up by EXECUTIVE ORDER. It will be put into effect VERY SOON]

10. FREE EDUCATION for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's
factory labor in its present form. COMBINATION OF EDUCATION WITH INDUSTRIAL
PRODUCTION, etc., etc." [17] [Here we call it "PUBLIC SCHOOLING" and its under both
the Federal government and the NEA. As for the last, did you ever hear of OUTCOME-
BASED EDUCATION? Of how about the latest - SCHOOL-TO-WORK?] So, I guess all of
the above pretty much makes America "MOSCOW WEST!"

Some MAXIMS OF MARX are based on SUN TZU's 'THE ART OF WAR.'
Communism teaches that THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS, therefore DECEPTION AND
LIES are their bywords. Unless you have a computer-like memory, though, this can often
get you in trouble. While pontificating on the joys of his utopian society, MARX
ATTACKED CHRISTIANITY. In his zeal to charge them with all of society's ills, he forgot
RULE #1 that HE HIMSELF spelled out in his COMMUNIST MANIFESTO:

"Has not CHRISTIANITY declaimed against PRIVATE PROPERTY, AGAINST
MARRIAGE, AGAINST THE STATE? Has it not preached, in the place of these, CHARITY
and POVERTY...? CHRISTIAN SOCIALISM is but the HOLY WATER with which the priest
consecrates the heartburnings of the aristocrat." He then goes on to praise SOCIALIST
and COMMUNIST PUBLICATIONS which:

"...ATTACK EVERY PRINCIPLE OF EXISTING SOCIETY. Hence they are full of the
most valuable materials for the ENLIGHTENMENT OF THE WORKING CLASS. The
practical measures proposed in them, such as the abolition of the distinction between
town and country, of the family, of the carrying on of industries for the account of private
individuals, and of the wage system, the proclamation of social harmony, the conversion
of the functions of the State into a mere superintendence of production, all these
proposals point solely to the DISAPPEARANCE OF CLASS ANTAGONISMS..." [18]

Contrary to popular belief, KARL MARX was NOT THE FOUNDER of the
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST PARTY: "...although MARX was often considered one of
the LEADERS of the COMMUNIST INTERNATIONALE...MARX [ACTUALLY] PLAYED NO
PART AT ALL. 'I was present,' he wrote ENGLES, 'only as A DUMB PERSONAGE on the
platform.' [but]...MARX became a well-used and important FRONT MAN for the SECRET
SOCIETIES which put the Internationale together...THE INTERNATIONALE, though itself
an open...association...became through its absorbtion of these existing SECRET
ORGANIZATIONS, a huge SEMI-SECRET SOCIETY...The ANTI-RELIGIOUS policy adopted
by the INTERNATIONALE was the work of these secret influences.' " [19]

[Things haven't changed much since the early days of communism. Many of our
present day pseudo-intellectuals still like to delude themselves into believing they are
doing all this for "MANKIND'S GOOD" - convincing themselves that they are SUPERIOR
to the "STUPID MASSES" - not realizing that they are being USED by the small handful of
POWERBROKERS, who, in turn, think of them as "STUPID, WOULD-BE
INTELLECTUALS!"]

COMMUNISTS ARE LIBERALS [and vice versa in some cases] and support
whatever political party PUSHES THEIR AGENDA: "...In FRANCE the Communists allied
themselves with the SOCIAL-DEMOCRATS AGAINST THE CONSERVATIVES and radical
bourgeoisie...In SWITZERLAND they supported the RADICALS...But they never ceased,
for a single instant, to instill into the working class the clearest possible recognition of
the HOSTILE ANTAGONISM between bourgeoisie and proletariat..." [20]

[The "BOURGEOISIE" are the "ARISTOCRATS" or "NOBILITY;" and the
"PROLETARIET" are the "MASSES" or "RABBLE," (or as they refer to us "CATTLE," or
"SHEOPLE!") according to my computer's thesaurus. Which one are YOU? Personally, I
don't care how politicians categorize me, because I am a CHRISTIAN - and that
AUTOMATICALLY makes me ROYALTY for my CREATOR tells me that - THANKS TO THE
PRICE PAID BY HIS SON, JESUS - I AM GOING TO INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD!]

COMMUNIST SLAVES: UNITE! When are people going to GET it? We are always
being sold a BILL OF GOODS on how WONDERFUL Communism and Socialism are. Now,
WHY on earth would all these ELITISTS want to do anything for YOU? Ask yourself:
WHAT DO THEY GET OUT OF IT? If you want to know the truth, check the HISTORY of
countries BEFORE Communism, and AFTER Communism - and consider carefully what
you will LOSE under their regime:

"In short, the COMMUNISTS everywhere support every revolutionary movement
AGAINST THE EXISTING SOCIAL AND POLITICAL ORDER OF THINGS. In all these
movements they bring to the front...the PROPERTY question...

"Finally, they labor everywhere for the union and agreement of the DEMOCRATIC
PARTIES of all countries. The COMMUNISTS disdain to conceal their views and aims.
They openly declare that their ENDS can be attained only by THE FORCIBLE
OVERTHROW OF ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS..." [21]

Worldwide SHIPPERS and METEOROLOGISTS owe a great deal to US naval
officer MATTHEW MAURY, and to the SCIENTIFIC FACTS RECORDED IN THE
SCRIPTURES:

"In 1839 MATTHEW FONTAINE MAURY was laid up because of a stagecoach
accident. During this time his son frequently read to him out of the BIBLE. One afternoon
the son read PSALMS, Chapter 8. When he came to VERSE 8, his father interrupted him,
saying 'READ THAT AGAIN.' His son read, 'The fowl of the air, and the fish of the sea,
and whatsoever passeth through the PATHS OF THE SEA.'

" 'It is enough,' said Maury. 'If the WORD OF GOD says there are paths in the sea,
THEY MUST BE THERE, and I am going to find them'." [22]

"Up to that time sailors had not yet chartered ocean currents, nor had they
discovered the advantage of using ocean currents to navigate...Maury describes his
search as 'nothing less than to BLAZE A WAY THROUGH THE WINDS OF THE SEA by
which the navigator may find the best paths at all seasons.'

"Today MAURY is considered the DEAN of all PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHERS and a
great contributor to the SCIENCE OF METEOROLOGY. He has been called the
'PATHFINDER OF THE SEAS.' His dream to perpetuate oceanographic knowledge
brought into existence the famous U.S. NAVAL ACADEMY at Annapolis, Maryland. All of
this happened in the life of MATTHEW FONTAINE MAURY because HE TOOK THE BIBLE
SERIOUSLY and determined to discover the REALITY of what it suggested in the
scientific field." [23]

[Would somebody care to explain to me exactly HOW these Jewish rabbis - who
supposedly got together SEVERAL THOUSAND YEARS AGO to write the 'BOOK OF
MYTHOLOGY' we call the "HOLY BIBLE," so they could "control the people" - MANAGED
to see "PATHWAYS IN THE SEA?" What kind of TECHNOLOGY did they use? Did they
have SATELLITES back THEN??!]

The kind of person who would buy into the ANTI-SOCIAL, ANTI-CIVILIZED, and
ANTI-GOD propaganda that CHARLES DARWIN sold tells us VOLUMES: "As early as
December 12th (only months after THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES is published), FREDRICK
ENGELS wrote to KARL MARX, 'DARWIN, whom I am just now reading, is SPLENDID.' [24]
When MARX wrote back, he fully and glowingly ENDORSED DARWIN'S THEORY and
teachings." [25]

According to the author and creator of MARXISM, it is based on HUMANISM and
SATANISM. "About a year later, (December 19, 1860) MARX, the FATHER OF
COMMUNISM, responded [to FREDERICK ENGELS]: 'During my time of trial, these last
few weeks, I have read all sorts of things. Among others, DARWIN's book of NATURAL
SELECTION. Although it is developed in the crude English style, this is the book which
contains THE BASIS IN NATURAL HISTORY FOR OUR VIEW.' " [26]

The following most definitely was never taught in school - and I would rather take
a beating than tell you - but, ALL Americans REALLY need to know this: "...Lincoln had
NO AUTHORITY to issue any EXECUTIVE ORDER, and he knew it. Thus, he
commissioned a special code [THE LIEBER CODE] to 'govern' his acts UNDER MARTIAL
LAW. In fact, the CODE merely JUSTIFIED his seizure of power. 'THE LIEBER
INSTRUCTIONS extended THE LAWS OF WAR and INTERNATIONAL LAW beyond the
boundaries of Washington, D.C., and FOR THE FIRST TIME, FOREIGN LAW was brought
onto AMERICAN soil!

"The United States GOVERNMENT became the CONQUERER in April of 1861 and
all states in the union were thus reformed as FRANCHISEES OF THE FEDERAL
CORPORATION. The key to when the states became Federal Franchisees is related to the
date when such states enacted the FIELD CODE in law..." [27]

[Back to BLACK'S. "FIELD CODE: The original NEW YORK CODE brought into
being by David Dudley Field in 1848 called for SIMPLIFICATION OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.
This CODE served as the MODEL for future state civil procedure codes and rules."]

As a SOUTHERNER, I would like y'all to understand that THIS was what the
CONFEDERATE STATES OF AMERICA were fighting for - it's called STATES Rights! The
"SLAVERY" [which was already slowly fading out] issue was created as a SMOKE
SCREEN to cover the HOSTILE TAKEOVER of all the States by the CENTRAL (i.e.,
Federal) GOVERNMENT. When WE lost - so did EVERY STATE in this country! Let me
show you WHY they REALLY did it:

In November of 1809 a 13TH AMENDMENT was proposed. When Congress opened
their next session the following year [January? 1810], they debated the proposed ANTI-
NOBILITY AMENDMENT to the CONSTITUTION, which read:

"...if ANY CITIZEN of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any
TITLE OF NOBILITY OR HONOR, or shall, without the consent of congress, accept and
retain any PRESENT, PENSION, OFFICE OR EMOLUMENT [COMMISSION or PAYMENT] of
any kind whatever, from any EMPEROR, KING, PRINCE, OR FOREIGN POWER, such
person shall CEASE TO BE A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES, and shall be incapable
of HOLDING ANY OFFICE OF TRUST OR PROFIT under them, or either of them." [28]

"All our [future] law will be PRIVATE LAW, written by THE NATIONAL LAW
INSTITUTE, LAW PROFESSORS, and the BAR ASSOCIATION, the AGENTS OF FOREIGN
BANKING INTERESTS...FRAUDULENTLY DELETING the 'TITLES OF NOBILITY AND
HONOR' - the THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT of the CONSTITUTION for the United States -
created an oligarchy of lawyers and bankers who control all three branches of our
government. Most of our [future] law will come directly through the HAGUE or the UN.
ALMOST ALL UN TREATIES WILL BE CODIFIED INTO THE US CODES...The UN will
control our education system." [29] In May the 13TH AMENDMENT passed both houses of
Congress, and was sent to the 17 states of the Union. [30]

The reason for the War of 1812 SUPPOSEDLY was because the British were
DRAFTING OUR MEN WITHOUT OUR CONSENT. But, where did they get the authority to
do that? The following may give us a clue as to what was really going on:

"By 1802, the U.S. government owned no stock in the UNITED STATES
BANK...The power and ability of the banks to influence REPRESENTATIVE
GOVERNMENT by ECONOMIC MANIPULATION and OUTRIGHT BRIBERY was exposed in
1811, when it was discovered EUROPEAN BANKING owned 80% of the bank. Congress
refused to renew the bank charter, which led to the withdrawal of $7,000,000 by European
investors. THIS caused a recession and the WAR OF 1812. There is a book in the
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS LAW LIBRARY called '2 VA LAW.' This reveals the
OVERTHROW OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT by SECRET AGREEMENTS
engineered by the lawyers. THIS WAS ONE OF THE REASONS FOR THE 13TH
AMENDMENT." [31]

TWELVE STATES had already RATIFIED the new 13TH AMENDMENT to the
CONSTITUTION. "The WAR OF 1812 interrupted that process, leaving the act of
ratification of only one state, VIRGINIA, preventing this Amendment from becoming a
permanent part of the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. Because the drafting of the 13TH
AMENDMENT was mainly concerned with BRITISH ATTEMPTS TO INFLUENCE
AMERICAN POLICY, through GIFTS to influential Americans such as LEGISLATORS,
LAWYERS and EDITORS, was there a CONNECTION between the MARCHING ON
SEVERAL STATE CAPITALS BY THE BRITISH, and their subsequent BURNING OF
PUBLIC RECORDS, INCLUDING THE 3TH AMENDMENT, AND THE STATE DOCUMENTS
RATIFYING IT? It certainly worked to their advantage!" [32]

In 1813 THOMAS JEFFERSON warned JOHN ADAMS "There is...an ARTIFICIAL
ARISTOCRACY founded on WEALTH and BIRTH, without either virtue or talents...The
artificial aristocracy is a mischievous ingredient in government, and provision should be
made to prevent its ascendency." The following year he seemed more optimistic. He
philosophized to THOMAS LAW "Nature [has] implanted in our breasts a LOVE OF
OTHERS, A SENSE OF DUTY to them, a MORAL INSTINCT, in short, which prompts us
irresistibly to feel and to succor their distresses." He may have been a little premature
[not to mention optimistic!], though:

"SEEKING TO RULE THE WORLD AND DESTROY THE UNITED STATES,
BANKERS COMMITTED MANY CRIMES. To escape prosecution bankers hired and formed
ALLIANCES with the BEST LAWYERS AND JUDGES MONEY COULD BUY. This alliance
originally forged in EUROPE and GREAT BRITAIN, spread to the colonies and into the
newly-formed United States of America. Despite their CRIMINAL FOUNDATION, these
alliances...generated WEALTH and, ultimately, RESPECTABILITY. Like a 20TH CENTURY
UNIT OF ORGANIZED CRIME, English bankers and lawyers wanted to be admired as
'LEGITIMATE BUSINESSMEN.' As their CRIMINAL FORTUNES grew, so did their
usefulness. So the BRITISH MONARCH legitimized these thieves by granting them
'TITLES OF NOBILITY'." [33]

Have you ever wondered about the notation "ESQ." or "ESQUIRE," after your
attorney's name? That is a TITLE OF NOBILITY given to him by the BRITISH CROWN: "In
COLONIAL AMERICA, attorneys trained attorneys but most held no 'title of nobility' or
'honor.' There was NO REQUIREMENT that one be a LAWYER to hold the position of
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL, or JUDGE. A citizen's 'COUNSEL OF
CHOICE' was not RESTRICTED TO A LAWYER and there was no State or Federal BAR
ASSOCIATION. The only organization that CERTIFIED LAWYERS was the
INTERNATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATION, chartered by the KING OF ENGLAND, head-
quartered in London, and closely associated with the INTERNATIONAL BANKING
SYSTEM. Lawyers admitted to the IBA received the rank of 'ESQUIRE,' a 'TITLE OF
NOBILITY.' " [34] How can an HONORARY TITLE threaten the American people? Perhaps
because it brings into question the LOYALTIES of any person who uses it:

" 'ESQUIRE' was the PRINCIPLE TITLE OF NOBILITY which the 13TH
AMENDMENT sought to PROHIBIT, thus prohibiting the HOLDING OF OFFICE in America
by BANKERS' LAWYERS with an 'ESQUIRE' behind their names, who are AGENTS OF
THE MONARCHY AND EUROPEAN BANKERS. ARTICLE 1, SECT. 9 of the CONSTITUTION
sought to PROHIBIT the INTERNATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATION...from granting titles of
nobility...Therefore, a 'TITLE OF NOBILITY' AMENDMENT that specified a PENALTY (loss
of citizenship) was proposed in 1789 and again in 1810.

"The MEANING of the amendment was seen in its intent to prohibit persons
having titles of nobility and loyalties to foreign governments and bankers from VOTING,
HOLDING PUBLIC OFFICE or USING THEIR SKILLS TO SUBVERT THE GOVERNMENT.
The missing amendment was referred to as the 'title of nobility' Amendment, but the
SECOND PROHIBITION AGAINST 'HONOUR' (honor), may have been more significant."
[35] When was the last time YOU were able to talk to YOUR Senator or Congressman
PERSONALLY? Or comprehend the LANGUAGE of the recent laws that were passed? Our
so-called "REPRESENTATIVES" live like ENGLISH ROYALTY, while WE LIVE LIKE
SERFS:

"The ARCHAIC DEFINITION OF 'HONOUR,' as used in the 13TH AMENDMENT,
meant 'anyone obtaining or HAVING AN ADVANTAGE OR PRIVILEGE OVER
ANOTHER'...By prohibiting 'honors' the Amendment prohibited any advantage or
privilege that would grant some citizens an unequal opportunity to achieve or exercise
political power. The SECOND MEANING (intent) of the 13th Amendment was to ensure
political equality among all American citizens, by prohibiting anyone, EVEN
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, from claiming or exercising SPECIAL PRIVILEGE OR POWER
(an 'honor') over OTHER CITIZENS. For example, anyone who had a specific 'IMMUITY'
FROM LAWSUITS WHICH WERE NOT AFFORDED TO ALL CITIZENS, would be enjoying a
separate privilege, and 'honor' and would therefore forfeit his right to vote or hold public
office. Just think of the 'immunities' from lawsuits that your JUDGES, LAWYERS,
POLITICIANS, and BUREAUCRATS currently enjoy. Or 'SPECIAL INTEREST'
LEGISLATION your government passes. 'SPECIAL INTERESTS' are simply EUPHEMISMS
for 'SPECIAL PRIVILEGES' or 'HONORS'." [36] America's future and YOUR future would
have been so much DIFFERENT, if our "REPRESENTATIVES" had been representing US,
instead of the INTERNATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATION, and the CROWN OF ENGLAND:

"Without their CURRENT PERSONAL IMMUNITIES (honors), your JUDGES and
IRS AGENTS would be unable to ABUSE COMMON CITIZENS without fear of legal
liability...Your GOVERNMENT's ability to systematically COERCE and ABUSE THE
PUBLIC would be all but eliminated under the 13th Amendment. NOW YOU KNOW WHY
THE BANKERS AND LAWYERS SECRETLY REPLACED THE 13TH AMENDMENT. Had they
not, [today] you would have the government our FOUNDING FATHERS intended when
they passed the 13th Amendment, a government OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, AND
FOR THE PEOPLE...The 13th Amendment was ratified as follows: [37]

MARYLAND: Dec. 25, 1810; TENNESSEE: Nov. 21, 1811; KENTUCKY: Jan 31, 1811;
GEORGIA: Dec. 13, 1811; OHIO: Jan 31, 1811; NORTH CAROLINA: Dec.23, 1811;
DELAWARE: Feb 2, 1811; MASSACHUSETTS: Feb. 27, 1812; PENNSYLVANIA: Feb. 6,
1811; NEW HAMPSHIRE: Dec. 10, 1812; NEW JERSEY: Feb. 13, 1811; VIRGINIA: March
10, 1819; VERMONT: Oct 24, 1811. In other words, it was LAW! So, how many OTHER
"laws" have simply been SECRETLY BURIED?

In August of 1814 POPE PIUS reinstated the JESUITS to all of their former rights
and privileges. [38] That same month, the BRITISH INVADED WASHINGTON, BURNING
CRUCIAL RECORDS: "...the British invaded the United States by three approaches -
Chesapeake Bay, Lake Champlain, and the mouth of the Mississippi...The British then
marched into Washington, PUT THE GOVERNMENT TO FLIGHT, AND SET FIRE TO THE
PUBLIC BUILDINGS. Proceeding toward Baltimore, the British fleet bombarded FORT
MCHENRY and then withdraw." [39] Four months later, the war ended, but like every war
since, this war did not settle the issues that led directly to the fighting:

"The WAR OF 1812 ended with great irony. The TREATY OF GHENT, concluding
the war, was signed on CHRISTMAS EVE. The peace treaty made no reference to the
issues of IMPRESSMENT (drafting) of American seamen, NAVAL BLOCKADES, or the
DISPUTED BOUNDARY WITH CANADA, which had (supposedly) CAUSED the war in the
first place. It merely RESTORED CONDITIONS to the way they were BEFORE THE WAR
BROKE OUT." (?!) Within a few years, the FEDERALIST PARTY would be but a memory,
and all members of Congress would identify themselves as REPUBLICANS. But these
Republicans had been sobered by the difficult war...They then turned to passing
nationalist legislation dealing with a national bank, protective tariffs, direct taxation, and
internal improvements. All of these measures were far more Hamiltonian than
Jeffersonian in nature." [40]

In 1819, NATIONAL FREEMASONRY was founded. [41] and in March of that year,
VIRGINIA finally ratified the 13TH AMENDMENT to the US CONSTITUTION, but the details
concerning their voting and statements concerning their ratification actions were LOST
to FIRE and RAIN. However, "...we have VIRGINIA LEGISLATION shortly thereafter, which
states that:

'there shall be published an edition of the LAWS OF THIS COMMONWEALTH, in
which shall be contained the following matters. that is to say: The CONSTITUTION OF
THE UNITED STATES, and THE AMENDMENTS THERETO...'The Constitution that was
published pursuant to this legislation INCLUDED THE NEWLY-RATIFIED 13TH. It is
inconceivable that Virginia would have authorized publishing the 13th unless the Virginia
legislature had RATIFIED the amendment." THERE IS NO RECORD OF CONGRESS EVER
REPEALING THIS AMENDMENT! [42] [Contact your Representatives and Senators and
demand to know: WHERE IS IT NOW??!]

Upon hearing the news of Virginia's ratification, the rest of the states reacted
quickly: "When Virginia ratified the 13th Amendment on March 10th, their action
COMPLETED the 13 states required to ratify an amendment. [VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE
ACT NO. 260, Virginia Archives of Richmond, file, page 299, micro-film]. It was published
by printing 4,000 copies, TRIPLE THE USUAL ORDER, with instructions to send a COPY
to PRESIDENT JAMES MONROE, JAMES MADISON and THOMAS JEFFERSON. Then it
was SHOWN as an AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION.

"The 14TH AMENDMENT would be the SLAVERY amendment." After the CIVIL
WAR the FIRST 13th Amendment DISAPPEARED. "Word spread of the ratification and the
following occured: RHODE ISLAND and KENTUCKY published the new Amendment in
1822; OHIO first published it in 1824; MAINE ordered 10,000 copies of the Constitution
with the 13th Amendment for school use in 1824 and again in 1831 for the Census
Edition; INDIANA Revised Laws of 1831 published the 13th Amendment on page 20,
Northwestern Territories in 1833; OHIO Published it in 1831 and again 1833; WISCONSIN
Territory in 1839; IOWA Territory in 1843; OHIO again in 1848; KANSAS Statutes in 1855;
NEBRASKA Territory in 1855, 1856, 1857, 1858, 1859 and 1860; COLORADO Territory
printed the U. S Constitution in its Statutes publication showing the 13th Amendment in
1868.

YOUR STATE HAD IT, BUT IT WAS STOLEN FROM YOU. Call your congressman
up right now, and thank him (her) for ROBBING you of your GOD-GIVEN RIGHT to the
13th Amendment. YOU ARE NOW A PEASANT." [43]

"In 1814 the NEW ENGLAND STATES met in Hartford to consider SECEDING from
the Union because the war had cost them considerable trade losses. They proclaimed the
RIGHT OF NULLIFICATION...in the 30s GEORGIA refused to follow several SUPREME
COURT decisions regarding the CHEROKEE Indians. [In December, 1832], SOUTH
CAROLINA declared certain federal tariffs NULL AND VOID. On December 10th,
PRESIDENT ANDREW JACKSON called nullification 'REBELLION AND TREASON,' but
both sides backed down." [44]

In the years before the Civil War, ABRAHAM LINCOLN - the man who would later
be credited with freeing the slaves - was AGAINST the GOVERNMENT GETTING
INVOLVED IN INDIVIDUAL STATE'S ISSUES, including the issue of SLAVERY. In 1845 he
wrote:

"I hold it a PARAMOUNT DUTY of us in the free states due to the union of the
states, and perhaps to LIBERTY itself, to LET THE SLAVERY OF OTHER STATES
ALONE." [45] On the subject of the western territories, he says: "The whole Nation is
interested that the best use shall be made of these territories. We want them for homes
and FREE WHITE PEOPLE. This they CANNOT be, to any considerable extent, if
SLAVERY be planted within them." [46]

Conditions were ripening for the coming WAR BETWEEN THE STATES, but
contrary to the BLACK AND WHITE SPIN of TODAY'S "HISTORIANS," it was INEVITABLE,
even WITHOUT the issue of SLAVERY. The REAL basis of the Civil War - as with ALL
wars, before or since - was GREED:

"LINCOLN was caught in the MIDDLE between the NORTHERN INDUSTRIALISTS
and the SOUTHERN AGRICULTURISTS, who both wanted to dominate WESTERN
EXPANSION because of the WEALTH it offered. The industrialists knew that the
agriculturists depended on slavery because cotton, upon which Southern wealth was
based, was very labor intensive and required the inexpensive labor that slavery provided.
They knew that if the Western lands were declared 'FREE STATES' then the SOUTHERN
AGRICULTURISTS WOULD BE UNABLE TO COMPETE, and would be forced to leave
Western expansion, and its POTENTIAL PROFITS, to the NORTHERN INDUSTRIALISTS."
[47]

All the things that have been happening for the last few years make a great deal
more sense if you first know the following: "...State and city governments - RATHER
THAN THE FEDERAL AUTHORITIES - were [originally] responsible for LOCAL law
enforcement [CLINTON changed all that]. So, only occasionally have Federal Courts ruled
on the matter of police protection. "However, in 1856 the U.S. SUPREME COURT declared
that LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT had NO DUTY TO PROTECT...but only a general duty
to ENFORCE the laws. [48] The FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT to the U.S. CONSTITUTION
gives you NO RIGHT TO POLICE PROTECTION." [This fella's been listening to Clinton
and the UN too long: NO Amendment "gives" rights to anybody. The Constitution and the
Amendments only "GUARANTEE" them. GOD GAVE US THESE RIGHTS!]

"On March 6th...CHIEF JUSTICE ROGER B. TANEY delivered the majority opinion
of the U.S. SUPREME COURT in the DRED SCOTT case. SEVEN of the nine justices
agreed that Dred Scott should REMAIN A SLAVE, but TANEY DID NOT STOP THERE. He
also ruled that as a SLAVE, Dred Scott was NOT A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES, and
therefore had NO RIGHT TO BRING SUIT in the federal courts ON ANY MATTER. In
addition, he declared that Scott had NEVER BEEN FREE, due to the fact that SLAVES
WERE PERSONAL PROPERTY; thus the MISSOURI COMPROMISE of 1820 was
UNCONSTITUTIONAL, and the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT had NO RIGHT TO PROHIBIT
SLAVERY in the new territories. THE COURT APPEARED TO BE SANCTIONING SLAVERY
UNDER THE TERMS OF THE CONSTITUTION itself, and saying that slavery could not be
outlawed or restricted within the United States." [49]

After hearing the Dred Scott decision, PRESIDENT LINCOLN made known in a
speech at Springfield, Illinois on June 26th that he DISAPPROVED OF THE DECISION of
Supreme Court Chief Justice ROGER B. TANEY:

"The Chief Justice does not directly assert, but plainly assumes as a fact, that the
public estimate of the black man is MORE FAVORABLE NOW THAN IN THE DAYS OF THE
REVOLUTION. In those days, by COMMON CONSENT, the SPREAD OF THE BLACK
MAN'S BONDAGE in the new countries was PROHIBITED; but now Congress decides that
it will not continue the prohibition, and the Supreme Court decides that it could not if it
would. In those days, our DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE was held SACRED by all,
and thought to INCLUDE ALL; but now, to aid in making the bondage of the negro
universal and eternal, it is assailed and sneered at, and constructed and hawked at, and
torn, till, if its FRAMERS could rise from their graves, they could not at all RECOGNIZE it.
All the powers of earth seem combining against the slave; MAMMON IS AFTER HIM [a
DEMONIC god], ambition follows, philosophy follows, and the theology of the day is fast
joining the cry." [50]

" 'If the Congress of the United States lacks authority to forbid slavery in a
territory, how can a lesser body, the territory itself, do so?' SENATOR STEPHEN A.
DOUGLAS answered this question in his so-called 'FREEPORT DOCTRINE' in 1858,
during the LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATES...He declared that SLAVERY COULD NOT
EXIST in any territory WITHOUT LOCAL POLICE REGULATIONS TO PROTECT IT. The
people of a territory could BAR slavery, if they wished, by REFUSING TO ENACT such
regulations. This interpretation angered the SOUTHERN DEMOCRATS and helped to split
the party into NORTHERN and SOUTHERN wings..." [51]

During the 1860s, attempts were made in Sicily to suppress the MAFIA, but were
UNSUCCESSFUL. [52] Meanwhile, a CIVIL WAR was brewing across this nation -
promoted by political interests who would bring this country to its knees:

"The American public reacted very strongly to the DRED SCOTT DECISION. ANTI-
SLAVERY GROUPS feared that slavery would spread unchecked. The new REPUBLICAN
PARTY, founded in 1854 to PROHIBIT THE SPREAD OF SLAVERY, now renewed their
fight to gain control of the Congress and the courts. Their well-planned political
campaign of 1860, coupled with divisive issues which split the DEMOCRATIC PARTY, led
to the election of ABRAHAM LINCOLN as PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and
SOUTH CAROLINA'S SECESSION from the Union. The DRED SCOTT DECISION moved
the country to the brink of Civil War." [53] [Actually, as you will soon learn, the reason for
the war was not as NOBLE as slavery]

Some called it "YANKEE KNOW-HOW," but regardless of how you view it, it made
a MOCKERY of a very SERIOUS ISSUE: "Slavery was not a 'SOUTHERN' PROBLEM
alone...residents of ILLINOIS owned slaves (under long-term INDENTURE AGREEMENTS
of 40 years or longer) during the period of the Dred Scott trials, and a special provision in
the Illinois constitution allowed slaves to work in the SALT MINES across the Mississippi
from St. Louis as long as they were not held there for over one year at a stretch. Many
people in southern Illinois supported slavery. No slaves in the St. Louis area PICKED
COTTON however, and few worked in farm fields. Most worked as STEVEDORES and
DRAYMEN on the riverfront, on riverboats, in the lead and salt mines, as HANDYMEN,
JANITORS and PORTERS (like Dred Scott), and as MAIDS, NANNIES, and LAUNDRESSES
(like Harriet Scott)." [54]

Some not only lived "FREE," they were WEALTHIER than most of their WHITE
neighbors: "In addition to SLAVES, St. Louis also had a fairly large FREE BLACK
community. AFRICAN-AMERICANS IN ST. LOUIS were able to live within the strict
'BLACK CODES,' which were harsh laws that applied to all African-Americans, BOTH free
and slave. MANY FREE BLACKS OWNED BUSINESSES which CARTED GOODS from
place to place after they were off-loaded from river boats. REAL ESTATE was also a
business known to free blacks. Others owned large BARBER EMPORIUMS, some with
REAL GOLD FAUCETS, MARBLE COUNTERTOPS and CRYSTAL CHANDELIERS, which
were used by all the IMPORTANT WHITE MEN of the town. These barbers were able to
gather INFORMATION that their WHITE CUSTOMERS discussed and pass it along to the
BLACK community. Many became so RICH that they became known as the 'COLORED
ARISTOCRACY' of St. Louis." [55]

"On November 6th, ABRAHAM LINCOLN - who had declared 'Government cannot
endure permanently half slave, half free...' was elected PRESIDENT. On the 20th of
December, SOUTH CAROLINA SECEDED from the Union. It was followed within TWO
MONTHS by MISSISSIPPI, FLORIDA, ALABAMA, GEORGIA, LOUISIANA and TEXAS. On
February 9th the CONFEDERATE STATES OF AMERICA was formed with JEFFERSON
DAVIS, a West Point graduate and former U.S. Army officer, as president. On March 4th
Abraham Lincoln was sworn in as the 16TH PRESIDENT of the United States of America."
[56]

No longer need you ask, "What has happened to our REPUBLIC?" The following
paragraphs will explain exactly HOW WE LOST AMERICA:

"When the SOUTHERN states WALKED OUT OF CONGRESS on March 27th, the
QUORUM to conduct business UNDER THE CONSTITUTION was lost. The ONLY VOTES
Congress can lawfully take, under PARLIAMENTARY LAW, are...to ADJOURN and [to] set
a date, time, and place to RECONVENE...Instead, Congress abandoned the House and
Senate, WITHOUT SETTING A DATE TO RECONVENE. Under the parliamentary law of
Congress, when this happens Congress becomes SINE DIE (pronounced see-na dee-a),
literally, 'without day:' An ADJOURNMENT SINE DIE - that is, without day, - CLOSES the
session, and IF THERE IS NO PROVISION FOR CONVENING THE ASSEMBLY AGAIN, of
course, the adjournment DISSOLVES THE ASSEMBLY." [57]

Where does the PRESIDENT get his AUTHORITY to make UNILATERAL LAW,
under the guise of "EXECUTIVE ORDERS?" Maybe he is going under this theory:

"...When Congress adjourned SINE DIE, it CEASED TO EXIST as a LAWFUL
deliberative body. The only lawful, CONSTITUTIONAL power who could DECLARE WAR
was NO LONGER LAWFUL - or in session! Congress did not reconvene until days later -
when it was reconvened UNDER THE MILITARY AUTHORITY OF THE COMMANDER-IN-
CHIEF - and NOT as a lawful CONSTITUTIONAL BODY.

"...In TITLE II (Vol. One of U.S. TITLES AND CODES) 'CONGRESS' is marked with
an ASTERISK and the NOTE at the bottom of the page indicates that the CONGRESS
EXISTS BY RESOLUTION, not positive law, OR b. ALL POSITIVE LAW TITLES ARE
MARKED WITH AN ASTERISK and TITLE II, 'THE CONGRESS,' has NONE. In this case the
FOOTNOTE states that THOSE MARKED WITH AN ASTERISK EXIST BY VIRTUE OF
POSITIVE LAW." [58]

According to BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY, a "RESOLUTION...is NOT LAW but
merely a FORM in which a legislative body EXPRESSES AN OPINION." Baker v. City of
Milwaukee, [271 Or. 500, 533 P.2d 772, 775] [59] Still consulting Black's, we find that
POSITIVE LAW is "LAW ACTUALLY AND SPECIFICALLY enacted or adopted by PROPER
AUTHORITY for the government of an organized jural society."

Colonists came to this country originally to be FREE of the dictates of a greedy
king and an ALL-POWERFUL STATE. They weren't eager to go back to that - so, they
made plans to go to war and fight for their INDEPENDENCE once more:

"On April 12th at 4:30 a.m. Confederates under GENERAL PIERRE BEAUREGARD
opened fire with 50 cannons upon FORT SUMPTER in Charleston, South Carolina. The
CIVIL WAR had begun.

"On the 21st, PRESIDENT LINCOLN issued a Proclamation [EXECUTIVE ORDER
NO. 1 - the FIRST ever signed by a President] calling for 75,000 militiamen, and
summoning a SPECIAL SESSION of Congress for July 4th. A few days later, President
Lincoln issued another Proclamation [EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 2], calling for a
BLOCKADE against Southern ports. OTHER E.O.s were issued under the authority of the
COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF by the ADJUTANT GENERAL, the TREASURY, and others. [60]
For the duration of the war the blockade LIMITED THE ABILITY OF THE RURAL SOUTH to
stay WELL-SUPPLIED in its war against the industrialized North." [61]

[In all fairness, and that is really hard for me (after 20 years up here, I am still not
very fond of the North!), I DON'T BELIEVE LINCOLN WAS EVIL OR POWER-MAD (I can't
say the SAME for CLINTON!). Congress had just walked out, remember. Although at the
beginning LINCOLN didn't want to interfere with STATES' RIGHTS, he REALLY WAS
AGAINST SLAVERY, so he was easily talked into the notion of a STRONG FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT - to "HOLD THE COUNTRY TOGETHER." And, I guess he never thought
about the fact that he was suppose to be the SOUTHERNERS' PRESIDENT, too!]
Interpreting the Constitution in a manner that was AT ODDS with the original intent, a
NATIONAL "CRISIS" was CREATED, in order to give the federal government
"AUTHORITY" to SUSPEND THE HABEAS CORPUS MANDATE, thereby creating a
FEDERAL DICTATORSHIP:

"The authority of the SUPREME COURT...was...OVERRULED BY LINCOLN, thus
converting the mode of the State temporarily from an oligarchy into an AUTOCRACY...just
such a contingency was foreseen by the framers of the constitution, in particular by
Hamilton. They were apparently well aware of the ease with which, in any period of
CRISIS, a quasi-republican mode of the State slips off into EXECUTIVE TYRANNY. [This
is why CLINTON keeps us in a constant STATE OF 'EMERGENCY' and STATE OF WAR]

"...Lincoln overruled the opinion of Chief Justice Taney that suspension of the
habeas corpus was UNCONSTITUTIONAL, and in consequence the mode of the
State...until 1865, [would be] a MONOCRATIC MILITARY DESPOTISM. In fact, from the
date of his proclamation of blockade, LINCOLN RULED UNCONSTITUTIONALLY
THROUGHOUT HIS TERM.

"The doctrine of 'RESERVED POWERS' was knaved up EX POST FACTO [after the
fact] as a JUSTIFICATION of his acts, but as far as the intent of the constitution was
concerned, it was obviously a pure INVENTION. In fact, a very good case could be made
out for the assertion that Lincoln's acts resulted in a permanent radical change in the
entire system of constitutional 'interpretation' - that SINCE HIS TIME 'INTERPRETATIONS'
HAVE NOT BEEN INTERPRETATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION, BUT MERELY OF PUBLIC
POLICY...A strict constitutionalist might indeed say that THE CONSTITUTION DIED IN
1861, and one would have to scratch one's head pretty diligently to refute him." [62]

[This is particularly interesting, considering this is the very same man who said:
"No man is good enough to govern another man WITHOUT THAT OTHER'S CONSENT."
But I guess, like with all idealists, the RULES CHANGE - as does the CONSTITUTION,
once he is at the helm!]

I will be back with Step #3 in two weeks. See y'all then!
 

Fact or Fiction...YOU Decide.

"But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord"

SOURCES

1] JEFFERSON WRITINGS, Merrill D. Peterson ed. - Literary Classics of the United States,
Inc. 1984

2] CHRISTIANITY AND THE CONSTITUTION by John Eidsmoe - Baker House Books 1987

3] THE MYTH OF SEPARATION by David Barton - Wallbuilder Press 1992

4] "Letter to Samuel Miller March 4, 1805" from A COMPILATION OF THE MESSAGES AND
PAPERS OF THE PRESIDENTS, 1789-1897 by James D. Richardson - Published by
Authority of Congress 3/4/1805

5] THE WRITINGS OF THOMAS JEFFERSON, Albert Bergh ed. - The Thomas Jefferson
Memorial Association 1904

6] DICTIONARY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE by Noah Webster [1824]; MYTH OF
SEPARATION Id

7] "ILLUMINATI OUTLINE OF HISTORY"

8] "REPORT OF A COMMITTEE TO THE NEW YORK STATE SENATE, TOGETHER WITH
EXTRACTS FROM OTHER AUTHENTIC DOCUMENTS ILLUSTRATING THE CHARACTER
AND PRINCIPLES OF FREE MASONRY" - Published by Request, and Under the Direction
of Several Citizens of New Haven - Printed by Hezekiah Howe 1829

9] "RISE AND PROGRESS OF REVOLUTION: A CHARGE TO THE GRAND JURIES OF THE
COUNTY COURTS OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA AT
DECEMBER SESSIONS 1800" - William Young, Bookseller and Stationer: Philadelphia, PA
1801; Reprinted by the Christian Book Club of America 1989; as quoted in "NEWSWATCH
MAGAZINE" Jan-Feb/ 1998

10] Id

11] "INVESTIGATION INTO FREEMASONRY BY A JOINT COMMITTEE OF THE
LEGISLATURE OF MASSACHUSETTS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES" March 1834

12] "A BRIEF HISTORY LESSON: HOW THE CONSPIRACY CAME TO POWER" - The
American Resistance Movement 1997

13] PREFACE from THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO by Frederick Engles - 1848 - John
Birch Society Ed.

14] "BRIEF HISTORY" Id

15] TREASON: THE NEW WORLD ORDER by Gurudas - Cassandra Press 1996

16] "PREFACE" by Frederick Engles - THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO - 1848 - John Birch
Society Ed.

17] THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO by Karl Marx, translation by Samuel Moore 1888 - John
Birch Society Ed. American Opinion 1974

18] Id

19] WORLD REVOLUTION by Nesta H. Webster - Britons Publishing Co. 1971 Ed., [1921]

20] Id

21] Id

22] ANCIENT SECRETS OF THE BIBLE by Charles E. Sellier and Brian Russell - Dell
Publishing/ Sun International Pictures, Inc. 1994

23] Id

24] EVOLUTION, MARXIAN BIOLOGY, AND THE SOCIAL SCENE by Conway Zirkle -
University of Pennsylvania Press 1959

25] Id

26] EVOLUTION Id; STALIN'S BRUTAL FAITH by Paul G. Humber - Institute for Creation
Research October 1987 PO Box 2667 El Cajon, CA 92021, Member, Evangelical Council for
Financial Accountability

27] "THE UNITED STATES=THE NEW ROMAN EMPIRE" by Alan Russell - Ojai Jural
Society 1997

28] "The 'Real' 13th Amendment: It's Mysterious Disappearance by Anthony Hargis in
Perceptions Magazine

29] Who Is Running America? The Bankruptcy of America, the Corporate United States,
and the New World Order as presented on the web by Barefoot Bob 1996

30] "The Original Thirteenth Amendment: Titles of Nobility and Honour," An Essay by
Richard C. Green with the Editing and Research assistance of David Dodge, Brian March
and Bob Hardison - Who is Running America? HTML by Barefoot Bob 9/97

31] Missing 13th Amendment To The United States Constitution by The Pen; Reprinted
from the Oregon Observer for April 1997 with permission.

32] Real' Id

33] Missing Id

34] Id

35] Id

36] Id

37] Id

38] Secret Societies by Milton William Cooper

39] History of the United States, A To 1877, 2nd Ed. by Gerald J. Goodwin, Richard N.
Current, and Paula A. Franklin - Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. 1980

40] Original Id

41] IOH

42] 'Real' Id

43] Missing Id

44] Treason: The New World Order by Gurudas - Cassandra Press 1996

45] American Political Tradition by Hofstadter (As reprinted in The Irony of Democracy
by Thomas R. Dye and L. Harmon Zeigler)

46] Id

47] The Irony of Democracy by Thomas R. Dye and T. Harmon Zeigler; as cited in An
Open Letter to All Americans: (The Elkhorn Manifesto) by R. William Davis - Founder and
Director, The Elkhorn Project - SHADOW OF THE SWASTIKA

48] South v. Maryland, 59 U.S. (HOW) 396,15 L.Ed., 433 (1856)]; "Dial 911 and Die" taped
from Cooper's Corner, a community-orientated program from Highland Park, Illinois,
featuring Jay Simkin - Mr. Aaron Zelman, Jews For the Preservation of Firearms
Ownership, 2872 So. Wentworth Avenue, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53207 Telephone (414)
769 0760

49] The Dred Scott Decision by Bob Moore, JNEM Historian

50] Lincoln Speech on the Dred Scott Decision June 26th, 1857 at Springfield, Illinois;
Reprinted in "Abe" Lincoln's Yarns and Stories by Henry Neil 1901

51] When is a Man Free? The Dred Scott Decision - Encyclopedia Britannica 1971

52] Illuminati Outline of History

53] The Dred Scott Decision by Bob Moore, JNEM Historian

54] Id

55] Id

56] U.S. Civil War 1861-1865 Timeline - The History Place 1996

57] The United States = The New Roman Empire by Alan Russell - Ojai Jural Society 1997

58] Id

59] Black's Law Dictionary: Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American and
English Jurisprudence, Ancient and Modern by Henry Campbell Black, M.A., 5th Ed. -
West Publishing Co. 1979

60] Ojai Jural Society Id

61] CW Timeline Id

62] Our Enemy, the State by Albert Jay Nock 1935

All emphasis throughout this article is mine, unless otherwise indicated.

*Remember: THE DEADLINE IS STILL 2000 A.D. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!

GODSPEED!
The OUTLAWLADY