BEYOND THE PLATE GLASS WINDOWS the sky grew steadily darker, as heavy
black clouds massed above Bluewater. Turning his eyes from the window, Charley
surveyed his surroundings. The interior of the small coffee shop presented a stark
contrast to the threatening atmosphere outside. It was well-lit, with framed Norman
Rockwell prints tastefully hung here and there - surrounded by antique copper and
wrought-iron kitchen utensils. An array of cheerful plants, complementing the matching
curtains and tablecloths, added to the down-home, "mom-and-apple-pie" appeal. Looking
over at a near-by table, he experienced a moment of deja vu - a cozy feeling of warmth
and safety, like he'd known back home in his own mom's kitchen: A couple of older ladies
were discussing an up-coming church bake sale. In the booth in front of him, two couples
were arguing over the merits of various football teams. No one, it seemed, was paying the
slightest bit of attention to what was happening outside. Running his fingers through
thinning white hair, Charley put down his morning paper, and slid out of the booth.

As he was leaving the men's room, he noticed a man standing in front of the sink.
There was something oddly familiar about him. Now, WHERE had he seen him before?
With a start of surprise, he clapped a hand on the man's back.

 "JOE!" he exclaimed. "Where have you been keeping yourself? Haven't seen you
around in - what's it been, now - five years?" Charley was truly delighted to see him.
Everybody loved Joe. He was always cheerful, with a good word for everybody.

 "CHARLEY! What you been up to, Old Man?" Joe grinned, offering his hand. Their
hands clasped warmly and they shook.

 "Got time for some coffee?" he asked. Joe nodded and they headed back to
Charley's booth, talking all the while.

After ordering coffee and rolls, the two old friends settled back and began
catching up on what had happened to each of them over the past few years. After a brief
discussion of their families, the conversation turned to the subject of politics. This led
inevitably to Clinton and his various scandals. Frowning, Joe told Charley that lately he
wasn't satisfied with the so-called news reports he had been reading and listening to on
TV.

 "I can't quite put my finger on it," Joe said thoughtfully, "but it's like there's
something missing. And their explanations for all the crazy things that suddenly seem to
be happening all the time, never seem to make any sense. Either we have the DUMBEST
bunch running our country right now - or they're a pack of CROOKS!" Looking around
the half-filled room, he leaned across the table. "I know this is going to make me sound
like one of those conspiracy nuts, but I keep getting this feeling that there's something
rotten coming out of Washington - something dark and, well...EVIL! And the worst of it is,
it seems to be spreading. This is not just politics anymore. This, this..." Joe struggled for
a word to describe what he was feeling. He settled for, "This THING is like some kind of
an ugly cancer, strangling our courts and ripping the heart out of our Constitution. We
can't trust our politicians, our cops, our judges - not even our teachers and preachers.
NOBODY! This just doesn't feel like my America - like a FREE country, anymore," he
confided in a low voice, adding "Especially since CLINTON and his bunch took over! Do
you know what I mean?" he asked plaintively.

 "You know," Charley mused, "That is a perfect description of what is going on
right now, and you're right. It's not just your imagination. There is something VERY REAL and concrete behind all this. Remember back in school, when we were studying the
Constitution, they talked about 'checks and balances' and the 'separation of powers'?"

"Kinda," Joe answered doubtfully. "But, that was an awfully long time ago," he
reminded Charley. "And all that legal mumbo-jumbo has a tendency to put me to sleep."

"Remember, the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence are part of that
'legal mumbo-jumbo,' Joe." Charley pointed out. "And the REVOKING of that 'legal
mumbo-jumbo' is exactly how the insiders are taking away the duty of our courts to
protect our God-given rights, Joe. They are counting on the common people going to
sleep. Because, if they're asleep, they won't be able to ASK QUESTIONS and the
globalists will be free to move ahead with their timetable for the destruction of our
country - and ultimately all of civilized society! What is needed right now are some very
UNcommon folks! Would you like me to tell you what is REALLY going on in Washington
and in our courts?" the older man asked. Nodding his head, Joe stared curiously at him.
Seeing he had his full attention, Charley began:

"In 1979 - under the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure [28 U.S.C. 2072] -
Congress authorized RULE 34(a) by the simple expedient of not rejecting it. Under this
Rule, JUDGES ARE NOT REQUIRED TO READ the legal briefs filed by your lawyer. Now
this is EXTREMELY important, Joe, because a brief contains the FACTS and the HISTORY
of a case. Judges can only bring a judgement based on what is - or ISN'T - presented in
court. If they don't read it, it is as if they don't EXIST! And, listen to this: According to
Rule 34(a), 'Oral argument shall be allowed in all cases UNLESS...a panel of three
judges...shall be unanimously of the opinion that oral argument is NOT NEEDED.' Now,
what that means in plain English is the judges can legally decide it isn't NECESSARY for
them to hear YOUR side! But, it gets worse, Joe:

"The integrity of the judges is never questioned. The bottom line is, the judges
determine the importance of appeals for their actual reading of the briefs, and make their
decisions - BASED ON LAW CLERK NOTES! Let me spell that out for you: effectively your
lawyer has just been GAGGED, because the ORAL argument in your case has been
dismissed and the WRITTEN case has been left to the determination of a LAW CLERK!
You can't even protest infringement of your constitutionally-protected 'civil rights,'
because YOU HAVE NO VOICE LEFT!"

"WHAT?" Joe yelped, incredulously. "You're telling me Congress actually permits
LAW CLERKS to decide something as important as a FEDERAL APPEAL?!!!" Stunned, he
shook his head, staring in disbelief at the older man. Charley remained quiet, allowing
Joe time to absorb what he had just heard. He could almost hear the gears grinding away
in his friend's brain, as it processed this incredible data. Finally, eyes narrowing, Joe
spoke: "How can they DO that? Doesn't that practically GUARANTEE corruption and
bribe-taking? By the way, exactly how many law clerks are there, and who appoints or
hires them, anyway?" he demanded.

Charley nodded his head approvingly. "You're getting it, Joe. The Rule invites
CORPORATE BARONS - and anybody else with enough money and clout - to CONTROL
THE FEDERAL COURTS and get by with it, like a modern form of ROYALTY! In answer to
your question about the law clerks, there is only ONE - and the judges themselves hire
him."

"But, that is OUTRAGEOUS!" exploded Joe. "Something has got to be DONE!
Can't we force Congress to clean up the federal courts?"

"Unfortunately, it's not just the federal courts. The STATE LEGISLATURES have
also been manipulated. State bar associations exercise power as state agencies, but
WITHOUT any legislative authority or controls to protect our rights and public interests!
Think about it, Joe: Corporate Baron law firms are controlling state bar associations from
within. The supposed 'ethics' agencies protect federal court insiders, who are
EVAPORATING our rights and the law through fraud. The 'legal mumbo-jumbo' you
referred to - the Checks-and-Balances provided by our Constitution - have been
completely NULLIFIED by a hidden regal power."

"What 'ethics agencies are you talking about?" Joe asked.

"The Bar Associations' Professional Responsibility Commission and the
Professional Responsibility Tribunal. They are suppose to investigate any charges of
unethical behavior of members of the bar, but THEY rely on Rule 34(a), too! So, when
they hold hearings, they are able to effectively GAG an attorney and SUPPRESS THE
EVIDENCE. By this method, they are able to magically change the original charges - we'll
call them 'APPLES' - into brand new charges, which we will call 'ORANGES.' Then the
attorney is investigated and disciplined for these phony oranges, which THEY HAVE
JUST CREATED OUT OF THIN AIR. And the original apple-charges are BURIED - as if they
never happened!"

"Whew!" Joe whistled, shaking his head again. "Alright. Let's see if I've got it: If
I'm understanding what you are saying correctly, all this private regal power is a result of
the ELIMINATION of these Checks-and-Balances. And WITHOUT them, the agencies you
just mentioned are able to hide the illegal and corrupt activities of federal court insiders.
Activities like protecting corporate bigwigs from legitimate claims brought against them
by ordinary citizens and businesses, like us. Is that what you're telling me?"

"You've got it, Joe, but regal power has OTHER advantages, as well: It also
protects the Corporate Barons from Monopoly and Price-discrimination laws. For the
right price or political advantage, Congress and the State Legislatures deliberately close
their eyes to corporate irregularities and treat the federal courts and bar associations like
holy cows. And with them in their pocket, Corporate Barons are free to hire REGAL
FOXES to guard the henhouses - at which point, our rights become nothing more than
helpless chickens. And remember, none of this is done OPENLY. The Corporate Barons
are smart. They know if the people ever found out what was REALLY going on, they
would never stand for it, so they HIDE WITHIN BIG GOVERNMENT - where they are able
to buy and affect regal power through their alliance with Left-Wing Socialists."

"Oh, come now," Joe protested. "I thought corporations were suppose to be
CONSERVATIVE. Aren't they the ones the Republican Party supposedly represent? I
mean, they are CAPITALISTS, for crying out loud! Aren't they? And isn't that the
OPPOSITE of Socialism?"

"Well, sure, Joe. But, remember, the thirst for power makes for strange
bedfellows."

"OK," Joe cut in, "But, how on earth have they been able to keep all this hidden
from us for so long? You're not going to tell me the Corporate Barons control the TV
news, not to mention newspapers and magazines?"

Charley nodded.

Joe sat back, visibly disturbed. "Well, if everything you say is true, the federal
court and bar associations are guilty of CRIMINAL FRAUD. So, why hasn't the JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT filed charges against them?" he demanded.

"Because, Joe, there is another big, dark secret that the Corporate Barons are
hiding: THEY are the ones who organized ROSS PEROT and the media for the specific
purpose of electing BILL CLINTON twice! In return, through JANET RENO, Clinton grants
them the same IMMUNITY from criminal prosecution as he does himself."

Looking stunned, Joe didn't answer for a minute. Then, clearing his throat, he
shook his head and put his hand up in a warding-off gesture, "You know, it's not that I'm
doubting what you say, but you have to admit this is an awful lot to swallow! I need more
time to think." Sliding out of the booth, he stood up. "Let's meet for coffee again in the
morning," he suggested.

By the following morning, the storms were gone, but the signs of their passing lay
scattered throughout the city. When Joe arrived for coffee, merchants and city workers
were busily engaged in cleaning up the mess. As he pushed the door of the coffee shop
open, he spotted Charley waiting for him in the back booth. After placing his order, they
briefly exchanged amenities. Then Joe recapped what he remembered from the day
before:

"OK," he said, "First, Congress allows law clerks to decide which federal appeals
will be heard, and what the judges can read. And for a price, these law clerks conceal the
corrupt federal judges' protection of huge corporations. Next, the state legislatures allow
the state bar associations to cover all this up, and finally, all of this is apparently known
and condoned by Reno and the President. And," Joe added, "on top of all that, this is
being kept hidden from the rest of us by the TV networks, Associated Press and
newspaper empires, ALSO controlled by the CEOs and their allies! Now, is that about it?"

"Yes, Joe. That's about it! Check-and-Balance voids - combined with media
control enables regal abuses of government power AT WILL. Try thinking about it this
way: When our Rights exist AT THE CONVENIENCE OF OTHERS, they have very little
meaning! This is a CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS, Joe! The rights of the present and future
generations are at stake. But, unfortunately, there are only a HANDFUL of us who know
what is really going on.

"We FELL ASLEEP, Joe. Big time! Take a look outside. Yesterday, newscasters -
on both the radio and TV - tried to warn us bad weather was coming. And yet, we allowed
ourselves to become so complacent in the knowledge that such a thing rarely hits US,
that nobody bothered to prepare for it. In here - and in our homes and our workplaces -
everything was normal. We KNEW, Joe! Nobody tried to hide it. But, still, we chose to
IGNORE what might happen - just like we do the threat of a government grown
completely out of control, and its inevitable police state. After all, government oppression
happens to OTHER people, somewhere else - like Russia and Nazi Germany! We are so
complacent in our belief that we still live in the 'GREATEST NATION ON EARTH' - and
by the way, Joe, that is no longer TRUE! - we barely give a thought to outrages like
WACO and RUBY RIDGE. This is Bluewater, for Heaven's sake! Bad things don't happen
HERE - and even if - on rare occasions - they do, they won't happen to MY home! So,
when they finally do - and let's face it: they ARE happening more and more everyday,
right here in our own country - we are totally UNPREPARED to deal with it!

"You know, you never hesitated when your government called on you, even when
they sent you half-way around the world to a country you'd never even heard of. And
what was their excuse? Well, they told you these people needed our 'protection' from the
encroachment of communism - and somehow all this would prevent an attack on 'OUR
way of life.' Of course, later we learned that while our men and women were being
slaughtered, OUR OWN LEADERS were helping the United Nations PROTECT THE
COMMUNISTS FROM US! And yet, in the face of all the questions that came out of
Vietnam, the Bush administration didn't have a bit of trouble finding thousands of
volunteers for the Gulf War! How come? Because we've been raised all our lives to
believe that our government is GOOD. And we are a generous people. We want to share
our good fortune. We sincerely believed that we were FREEING the world's oppressed
people by spreading 'Democracy' - supposedly OUR system. But, instead of becoming
freer, the world has become more and more dangerous and oppressive. Just think: since
our most famous 'ANTI-WAR,' DRAFT-DODGING President has been in, there have been
over a HUNDRED wars going on around the world!

"Now, don't get me wrong, Joe. I'm not knocking YOU for it. You didn't KNOW.

Your reasons for going were innocent - even noble. BUT! While they kept our attention on
troubles thousands of miles away, government traitors were quietly pulling OTHER
Trojan Horses inside our gates. And when these horses were opened, out poured
thousands of deadly SNAKES. Of course, by the time the honest members of government
and the courts had figured out what these 'gifts' really were, it was too late: they had
already slithered into our homes, schools, and churches. Because you forgot, Joe - and
so did we back home - to protect our CONSTITUTION, our RIGHTS, our LIBERTIES and
our JUDEO-CHRISTIAN VALUES. We just took them for granted, assuming they would
always be there! But like the 'apples' we talked about yesterday, those values are
evaporating before our very eyes. Regal insiders are working hard to change  our God-given rights and values
into socialistic STATE-CONTROLLED PRIVILEGES. And those values are the only
PROTECTIONS standing between us and the regal tyranny we are discussing right now!
 

"Look around you Joe. While we slept, royal powers secretly took over our so-
called 'democratic' government - as well as almost every court in this land. Oh, and by the
way, exactly when WAS the last time you pledged allegiance to the flag and to the
'DEMOCRACY' for which it stands?"

"I know. I know," Joe said, throwing his hands up in a "That's enough!" gesture.
"You're not the only one who's been reminding me of late that we were founded as a
REPUBLIC - NOT a 'Democracy!' " Putting his hands down, he gave Charlie a thoughtful
look. "OK," he said quietly. "I'm having a heck of a time believing this could happen in
America, but, I guess I have to accept that it IS," he admitted, with a sigh. "And I agree
something has to be done about it. But, exactly what CAN we do? Where on earth do we
BEGIN?" he asked in exasperation.

"Well, Joe, we need to remember that it was the DEFEAT OF ROYAL POWER that
enabled us to live for over two hundred years as a FREE Republic. Our Charter - our
Declaration of Independence - clearly spelled out the Judeo-Christian principles of
INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, RELIGIOUS LIBERTIES and MORAL STANDARDS for the common
citizens. And our Constitution was designed to PROTECT the God-given rights of 'we, the
people,' rich and poor, alike, through the use of CHECKS-AND-BALANCES against royal
concentrations of government power. Our government was set up so the power - invested
in them by the people - would be divided EQUALLY between the different branches of
government. But, that's not the end of it: each branch or agency is suppose to keep a
check on themselves - AND all the others. Something they have failed miserably at in the
last few years!"

"Well, apparently somebody is working awfully hard at dumbing us down!" Joe
observed. "Because I haven't heard the term 'checks and balances' since I was back in
school. And the ONLY time I hear any mention of the Constitution anymore, it seems to be by
politicians wanting to get more money from us. Oh, of course, somebody is always
yelling, 'I know my RIGHTS!' And, we just take it for granted they are talking about their
CONSTITUTIONAL rights. But with what I've been learning lately, I'm not so sure the
rights they are talking about have anything to do with the Constitution. I read through it
last night, and there seem to be an awful lot of things going on that I couldn't find in
there. As a matter of fact, a lot of our laws and 'rights' seem to be in OPPOSITION to our
Constitution! Somehow we are going to have to persuade people to WAKE UP and start
teaching those Judeo-Christian principles and your checks-and-balance principles again.
But like I said, where do we begin?"

"They aren't MY principles," Charley corrected him. "They belong to ALL of us!
They are protections against regal tyranny spelled out in the Constitution. But, getting
back to your question. We start with our homes, our schools, bible colleges and law
schools. If we are serious about saving our freedoms, we need to ignite a CHECK-AND-
BALANCE FIRESTORM of PUBLIC OUTRAGE. Scandal breeds reform, so, if we can
expose the traitors to the spotlight of public opinion and persuade political candidates of
good character to take up the check-and-balance causes, then the firestorms of public
outrage will be unstoppable."

"Well, I hope you're right!" Joe mused, "Because, once it starts, maybe Congress
and the State Legislatures will be FORCED by public opinion to restore Checks-and-
Balances, as well as the Constitutional protections of our rights."

"Let me tell you what started this whole thing, Joe. When Corporate Barons and
the Oklahoma Bar Association stupidly and arrogantly bragged they were above the law,
they got caught - and they were forced to pick a fight with the Oklahoma Supreme Court.
That was a BIG MISTAKE. This was a perfect example of the conversion of apples-into-
oranges. Check it out: In three separate Tulsa cases, corrupt federal judges protected
Corporate Barons from damage claims made by ordinary citizens and small businesses,
through the simple expedient of TRANSFORMING the original damage claims - or 'apples'
- into frivolous 'oranges'. And in each of these appeals, their regal fraud was concealed
by bought-and-paid-for law clerks. Now, neither the clerk - nor any of the judges -
MENTIONED THE APPLES! So, the original complaints simply evaporated into thin air,
replaced by oranges - brand-new, completely-phony complaints. Nothing more than
INVENTIONS OF THE JUDGES - created to cover the disappearance of the apples! They
HAD TO DISAPPEAR, because if they had been allowed to be heard - or left on the books
- they would have exposed the fraud of both the Corporate Barons - and the courts!
That's why the judges changed the charges into something that was never filed - the
oranges, and eliminated any mention of the original charges - the apples. Got it?"

Joe nodded.

"Now," Charley went on, "let me show you exactly how these regal maggots got
themselves caught:

"An Oklahoma attorney challenged their fraud, so they decided to get rid of him
by suspending him from federal court practice, claiming he had violated protocol.
PROTOCOL, for crying out loud! He hadn't violated a client's civil rights, broken his oath
to support the Constitution or his bar association oath. In fact, he was suspended
because he HAD upheld his oath! But, instead of the Oklahoma Bar Association
defending him, they charged him with ethics violations for FILING ORANGES - instead of
the apples he had ACTUALLY filed! But, then the attorney did something NONE of them
had counted on: he counter-attacked with the ORIGINAL complaints - the 'apples' they
thought were dead and buried! And, of course when he did that, he also exposed their
oranges! But, here's where they really messed up: they COULDN'T WITHDRAW their
unethical attack. First, there had to be an Oklahoma Supreme Court review or an
exposure of the fraud."

Joe laughed. "Boy! I'd sure love to have seen their faces when they realized that!
What'd they do then?"

"Well, they didn't have TIME to do anything about it. Because, before they could
find a way to cover up the record of their unethical attack, or launch a new one, the
attorney had brought a TEST APPEAL into federal court. He pushed the story of the
apples AND the oranges all the way up to Janet Reno and Bill Clinton. Then, when they
tried to bury it [Gee! What a surprise!], he had proof of Reno and Clinton's complicity,
which he immediately placed in the public record and brought before the Oklahoma
Supreme Court.

"Then the attorney pushed even harder. So, with nothing to lose, these regal
maggots gambled. They used the state ethics agency to attack the Oklahoma Supreme
Court with fictitious oranges and regal power and the LOWLY state justices were
instructed to ROLL OVER! But, each Oklahoma Justice has the duty, authority and power
to defend our Constitution and force a wall-shaking decision of nationwide magnitude.
And those corrupt judges can't honestly show the Oklahoma Court which apple was not
changed into an orange in federal court, because THEY ALL WERE. And, Joe, they can't
hide their regal attacks and showdown - nor can they be disguised, because now it's part
of the public record, and even on the Internet!"

Joe's grin slipped. "But how does he expect to make a difference? He's just one
little attorney against all those elite power-mongers," he said with a frown.

"That's not the issue, Joe. You're right: all this did BEGIN with one little attorney
who refused to roll over. But, now, the Oklahoma Supreme Court can shake walls,
because the preservation of our Constitution and the rights of the present and future
generations are at stake. And this self-bestowed regal power to change our rights into
oranges is exactly why we need to stir up check-and-balance firestorms and public
outrage. And remember, Joe: A FIRESTORM BEGINS WITH ONE TINY EMBER!"

"WHOA!" Throwing his hand up, Joe interrupted him. "Let's take a break. All these
apples-and-oranges and checks-and-balances are giving me a HEADACHE! I need to go
home and sort them out. Let me borrow those documents. I'll read them over tonight, and
we'll try this again in the morning."

"But, we can't wait that long," Joe said. "If this guy is willing to put his neck on
the chopping block for us, we've got to be willing to step up to the plate and be counted,
too! We have to show him - AND those power-mad regal insiders - that he's not alone out
there: We've got to let our families, friends and church members know what's going on
right NOW! Not to mention radio talk-show hosts, and just about everybody on the
Internet and other alternative and underground media. As you said, we've GOT to get a
check-and-balance firestorm going! With enough pressure, Congress and the State
Legislatures will simply HAVE to clean up the bar associations and federal courts."

"You're right, but we need to discuss the multinational danger of all this. We've
been talking about the danger this Apple-Gate poses for us, with Clinton and Reno
protecting illegal purchases of regal power, but Clinton also sold out to MULTINATIONAL
regal powers. While WEAKENING OUR MILITARY, he has been helping the Corporate
Barons and their allies in the transfer of our top-secret military technology to ENEMY
nations. It's the China-Gate to regal power, WORLDWIDE. And those HIGH CRIMES and
ACTS OF TREASON are why the Corporate-controlled Media have gone all out - not only
to protect Clinton - but, also, to CLONE him in the White House. In order for them to
maintain their power, Clinton and his buddies - the multinational Corporate Barons - need
the protection of MORE maggots, DISGUISED AS FEDERAL JUDGES.

"Before Clinton nominated Reno for Attorney General, he made it clear that he
wanted a team-player in the Justice Department. Then he explained exactly what that
meant. So, when Reno took office, the very first thing she did was to start throwing out
honest judges, who were then replaced with 'team-player' judges!"

"Well, I guess that would explain why Clinton screamed so loud about the Senate
Republicans blocking many of his nominations for federal judgeships, wouldn't it? But
now," declared Joe, "it's ACTION time. I agree with you: the individual rights, religious
liberties and moral standards of the present and future generations definitely depend on
us lighting a fire under the American people, RIGHT NOW! Because, once we start taking
names and advertising them on talk radio, C-Span, Christian broadcasts, the Internet, in
the 'Washington Times,' etc., the GOOD GUYS in Congress and the Senate and House
Judiciary Committee will WANT to support public hearings, and, of course, the BAD
GUYS won't want to be branded as crooks in the public spotlight, so they will be
FORCED to go along with them. As soon as this wakeup news breaks, the Trojan Horse
will shatter and implode within the federal courts and agencies, and hopefully,
Congressional checks-and-balance hearings will commence, forthwith!"

Excitedly, they began making a list of who to contact and divided it up between
them. Then they sat back and grinned with satisfaction and determination. After agreeing
to set up meetings with friends for the following day, they left to get ready. Driving away
from the coffee shop, a bumper sticker caught Charley's eye. The simple message was:

By the way, what are YOU going to do about this theft of your rights and your
freedoms? Are you going to simply sit back and allow Klinton and his cronies to continue
robbing you of EVERYTHING YOU WORKED FOR - not to mention your DREAMS and
your children's FUTURES? For ALL our sakes, we hope you will be setting up a similar
action meeting, elsewhere. Remember: FREEDOM IS NOT FREE!

As the first shots were being fired at Concord, Edmund Burke admonished
Parliament: "ALL THAT IS NECESSARY FOR EVIL TO TRIUMPH - IS FOR GOOD MEN TO
DO NOTHING."

The time has come to take a stand! Your voice and your talents are needed. This
is NOT for your country or your President. This is for YOU, your FAMILY, your FRIENDS -
and your FUTURE. In other words, this is a call for UNCOMMON MEN AND WOMEN! Does
this describe YOU?

DURING THE MID-13TH CENTURY, some very sneaky Greeks left a huge wooden
horse outside the City of Troy. Foolishly, the city fathers pulled it inside and there it
stood - unguarded - for the night. There is an old saying "Never look a gift horse in the
mouth," but in this particular case, it would have been much wiser had they checked out
its BELLY! For under cover of darkness, Greek soldiers poured out of it and threw open
the massive city gates - thereby enabling Troy to be captured. Now, I guess just about
everybody's familiar with this ORIGINAL version of the Trojan Horse, but, I bet you
DIDN'T know about the MODERN one! So, let me tell you what happened right here in the
good old US of A, back in 1979:

It all began with a group of corrupt lawyers, federal judges and other crooks
thirsting for royal power - something prohibited by our Constitution. Using history as
their guide, they designed a MODERN TROJAN HORSE to conceal and protect
government power over law - by fiat [decree]. Today, with 'Slick Willie' infesting the
Presidency, our Constitutionally-protected, GOD-GIVEN rights are being EVAPORATED
into thin air - as if they never existed! Unchecked by Congress and the Supreme Court,
this illegal power is being concealed by an army of Trojan Horse lawyers, law clerks,
federal judges, Justice Department and Bar Association insiders and the AP/Major Media.
Gradually, this corrupt government power - i.e., ROYAL SOCIALISM - is assigning an
unwitting population to plantation villages, where these insiders are regally dictating
which laws and rights are POLITICALLY CORRECT [permissable].

THIS Trojan Horse hides behind APPELLATE RULE 34(a). In 1979, it was pulled
through the back door of Congress, by means of the RULES ENABLING ACT [28 U.S.C.
2071], and from there, into the federal courts - by lawyers on the Judiciary Committees of
Congress. Under the language of Rule 34(a), a mere "examination" of the appeal briefs -
by SOMEONE - is all that is required. Translated, that means the appeal briefs and notes
are read by a Circuit Court of Appeals LAW CLERK. No Circuit JUDGE duty is stated or
required! This rule presumes ALL federal judges and inside lawyer/law clerks are
HONEST [Why, SURE they are!], while aborting legal safeguards against inside corruption
. Then, in 1980, the federal judge and law clerk crimes were protected from complaints for
misconduct by 28 U.S.C. 372(c)(3) [i.e., they couldn't be SUED!] - another back door trick
by Judiciary Committee lawyers.

Amazingly, alert Circuit Judges in the 4th, 5th and 11th Circuit Courts of Appeal -
3 of the 13 Federal Circuits - REFUSED Rule 34(a) Trojan Horse dangers! They retained
the duty of each circuit judge on the hearing panel to READ THE ACTUAL APPEAL
BRIEFS before deciding the appeal - a common sense safeguard against corruption.
Figuratively speaking, the Trojan Horse stomps our rights and the law into a concealing
dust of public confusion. The dark dangers it poses are red-flagged by the following
comments:

In effect, the defrauded federal courts and agencies become weapons of ROYAL
UNLAW. The 1979 Trojan Horse enables law enacted by Congress and settled by the
Supreme Court to be selectively ABORTED AT WILL. This internal danger was pulled in
and continues today with the consent of Judiciary Committee lawyers - the THIRD
BRANCH of government.

In 1979, THOMAS R. BRETT and JAMES O. ELLISON were appointed as federal
district judges at Tulsa, Oklahoma. Over the next 15 years, they arrogantly evaporated
law, rights and damage claims - call them 'APPLES' - and illegally created 'ORANGES'
[bogus charges] to protect Goodyear, Union Pacific, American Airlines and the Federal
Aeronautics Administration [FAA]. This spawned jungle warfare in the defrauded district
and circuit courts. These high-level crimes were not only protected, but JOINED by RENO
and 'SLICK WILLIE!'

Does it make any difference to YOU who rules our country? 'WE THE PEOPLE'
or...? The ancient Athenians taught power from within, and proved their point with a
Trojan Horse. And today the Communists, the Mob, and One-World-Government insiders
are all succeeding greatly - using these very same methods. Every one of them are anti-
American, anti-Christian, and anti-Constitution. And every one of them are FRIENDS of
Clinton! THINK about it: Our REPUBLIC was founded by CHALLENGING ROYAL POWER
on July 4, 1776. But we SLEPT in defense of the Declaration of Independence and our
Constitution, so, royal power returned with the MERGING OF SOCIALISM and the
TROJAN HORSE [Rule 34(a)] in 1979.

As this Century began, TEDDY ROOSEVELT challenged the ROBBER BARONS,
who openly and royally reigned over business monopolies and the rights of others -
through the purchase of government power over law. True: the industrial and oil trusts
WERE busted into competitive structures, but the Robber Barons CONTINUED to
manipulate the big banks and inflate the stock markets in SECRET. This produced Black
Monday and the Great Depression.

Then in 1917, the royalty of Russia was deposed by a dictatorial form of
Socialism, called COMMUNISM. The communist leaders became the NEW Russian royalty
and oppressed the people in the NAME OF THE PEOPLE - a pattern for the Trojan Horse
of 1979. The Soviets guided the Socialist movement within OUR Nation and used the
LIBERAL banner to lure votes. Their system of ROYAL SOCIALISM taught corrupt
insiders how to infiltrate and manipulate the major media, government institutions, drug
traffic, labor unions, etc. And the Corporate Barons and their yes-men lawyers were VERY
good students!

Now, I make no claim that ALL corporations are run by "Corporate Barons." Only
the heads of huge domestic and multinational corporations, who PURCHASE
GOVERNMENT POWER to quash the rights of competitors and others. But, unlike the
Robber Barons of 1900, the Royal powers of the Corporate Barons are refined and
HIDDEN. The Judiciary Committee and AP/Major Media insiders are managed, bought and
paid for. Granted, many lawyers, judges, government officials and corporate heads are
corrupt and do corrupt things, but many others have a RUSH LIMBAUGH complex: they
are unable to comprehend how corporate heads could possibly be allied with Big
Government SOCIALISTS. Sure, individual rights and business interests ARE inherently
threatened by Socialism. But, let's not forget Lord Acton's warning:

The POWER of the Trojan Horse is the UNSEEN LINK. The Corporate Barons and
their media yes-men willingly link themselves to Socialists - in exchange for the promise
of Royal Power over the law and our rights. And this Royal Power is UNCHECKED AND
UNBOTHERED BY OUR CONSTITUTION! We know that LOCAL government requires
constant public scrutiny, plus media coverage. At the STATE level, our public oversight
becomes even more difficult and needs honest media coverage. And at the enormous
FEDERAL level, our scrutiny absolutely requires CHECKS-AND-BALANCES and HONEST
media information. But we - and many within the media - have been blind-sided and
duped by the AP/Major Media management and Judiciary Committee lawyers.

How are the TROJAN HORSE INSIDERS able to get past the Supreme Court?
Simple: Between 10,000 and 12,000 cases are filed annually with the Supreme Court. Out
of these, only 50 or so will be accepted for review. So BRIBED SUPREME COURT LAW
CLERKS assure Justices do not SEE the criminal fraud within the circuit courts of
appeals. And the BAR ASSOCIATIONS are infested with TROJAN HORSE LAWYERS - who
VETO public exposure by bar investigations. It would appear that not a single state bar
association is inconvenienced by state legislation. So the FOXES are guarding the hen
houses. In short, our rights are small and UNPROTECTED from big government, ABSENT
CHECKS-AND-BALANCES!

During the post-WATERGATE era, Corporate Barons and their minions purchased
major media and the Associated Press from within. Then they traded media power for
political power alliances with the LEFT-WING and used these to work Congress. From
that point on, the big-government powers of Socialism MUSHROOMED, as did the Royal
Trojan Horse powers. All of which raise some very interesting questions: Are insiders
being fed from the annual corporate welfare of $75 to $150 billion, as authorized by
Congress? Did the Corporate Barons agree to overbilling by big law firms? Is the excess
being used by the lawyers as payoffs to bribe, influence and orchestrate corruption
within our public institutions and the AP/Major Media? Worse yet, these inside criminals
and their crimes were given immunity from prosecution by the Justice Department, with
the plurality elections of 'Slick Willie' - the CROWNING ACHIEVEMENTS of Corport
Barons, including H. ROSS PEROT, along with their AP/Major Media minions!

Sure. Socialism CONFLICTS with business interests, but the Corporate Barons
want royal government power over law and the rights of competitors and others - at ANY
PRICE! And the Socialists - the Left-Wing - want big government powers over the people.
So, in 1979, Judiciary Committee lawyers performed a Power Wedding, attended and
concealed by Major Media insiders. This UNHOLY UNION produced the Trojan Horse and
birthed 'Slick Willie' and his circle. And today, it has effectively reduced us to having
SECOND-CLASS rights on their PLANTATIONS and in their VILLAGES, where we are
heavily-taxed for our care, and where what we think and don't know is tightly controlled.

It's true that the SOCIALISTS REIGN with royal judicial and bureaucratic powers.
But these abuses of government power can only be PARTIALLY-disguised, since they are
effectively DESTROYING our state and local governments, schools, churches, property
rights and moral standards. Our Constitution does guarantee that the government will
protect the God-given rights of ALL citizens, but not GROUP rights! Civil rights
legislation defines minority classes, but protects only the rights of the INDIVIDUAL within
the defined class. Therefore, activists generate ROYAL GUISES of statutory and
constitutional rights, including group rights for homosexuals, etc. The judges make fact-
findings ENGINEERED to support the guises. Moreover, big law firms in opposition -
typically suckling on Corporate Baron money bottles - fear to challenge these abuses of
fact and settled law.

CONGRESS NEEDS TO: 1] Require a JURY determination of whether the evidence
rises to the level of denying a clearly-settled statutory, or Constitutionally-protected God-
given right 2] Prohibit FEDERAL court jurisdiction for group rights and 3] REFORM the
Enabling Acts, Rules and Regulations presently conferring Royal Power.

Corporate Barons, Slick Willie, Judiciary Committees, the Associated Press, IRS,
FBI, and Reno Justice Department have created a huge Royal Octopus lurking within an
undrained government cesspool, because the good guys have ASSUMED Checks-and-
Balances and therefore, they have done NOTHING about it, other than wrestle with
symptoms. That's like trying to build the second story of a house on the loose sands of a
vacant lot!

To date, there has been a TOTAL AP/MAJOR MEDIA BLACKOUT of this inside
fraud. The ASSOCIATED PRESS has become an unlawful wire service monopoly and
public endangerment. The UPI and other wire services are being denied equal access.
SLANTED editorials are guised as the news - AP-wired and repeated by newspapers and
TV and radio stations, as are computer and question-RIGGED public opinion polls. The
AP/Major Media propaganda tools slant the news, thoughts and votes by repeating and
selling sweet and teary-eyed BIG LIES. Does the following sound familiar?:

The Corporate Barons are multi-national in scope. Their royal government powers
by purchase, appear in much of Europe and the Far East, where the people are
accustomed to lower-class status. Here and there, the teary-eyes attack CHRISIANITY,
because Government tyranny is inherently THREATENED by the Judeo-Christian
principles of individual rights, religious freedoms and moral standards. Why else do you
think 'Slick Willie' abused government power during the last campaign, to attack the
CHRISTIAN COALITION for providing VOTER information - at the exact same time he
himself was arrogantly giving a national campaign speech in a Black Baptist church? And
why is he CONTINUING to do it today, when he - SUPPOSEDLY - is out of the running?!

Rumors have been floating around Washington for some time that Clinton has no
intention of stepping down. So, recently, an insider - a well-known woman reporter -
reminded him that a third term was unconstitutional, so, how could he possibly manage
that? Expecting him to say something about polls or a Constitutional amendment, she
was shocked to see his eyes turn cold and - with a look that chilled her to the bone -
respond in a voice like ice: "WORLD WAR!" And we put this guy in TWICE?? Shades of
HITLER! What have we DONE? God forgive us!

As the facts and documents empowering this Story progressed, so did the
following "WHO ME?" reactions:

This Test of Truth speaks to an internal crisis of LANDMARK magnitude and
DEMANDS Congressional hearings. All members and committee chairmen in Congress
swore to protect our Constitution and system of law, and under that oath, they must
guarantee and/or conduct Checks-and-Balance hearings. Sure, the scandal will be
painful, but the public truths will set us free. Accordingly, the Congressional hearings
and house-cleaning reforms must be blunt and wholly unobstructed by legalese and
special prosecutors. When called, Judge Brett will invoke his 5th Amendment rights, or if
granted immunity, explain how the crimes were concealed on appeal, and HOW HE KNEW
THAT RENO AND SLICK WILLIE WOULD GRANT IMMUNITY.

The circuit judges, when called, will testify to being defrauded by the notes of
others. But, why didn't they safeguard rights by, for example, READING the actual appeal
briefs supporting this Story? When called, U.S. Attorney STEPHEN LEWIS will invoke the
5th, or if granted immunity, implicate RENO. She might take and DRINK THE 5TH, but if
granted immunity, she could implicate SLICK WILLIE, as may Leon Panetta. Then they
must call Slick Willie and demand to know why he REFUSED to protect our Constitution,
and why he acted in complicity with the Trojan Horse insiders? And why the impeachable
offenses, in spite of the February 21, 1997 demand notice, copies of which were sent to
Reno and Key Members of Congress? It appears that BERNARD NUSSBAUM and
HILLARY RODHAM learned, after being Watergate investigators, how high level
government and criminal justice insiders could conceal select crimes - the Trojan Horse
agenda.

This TEST OF TRUTH in the uncommon defense of our Constitution calls for
UNCOMMON DEFENDERS. Should any Member of Congress balk, kiss them good-bye
and brand them as the TRAITORS they are - along with 'Slick Willie.' Only the CORRUPT
will be offended, while some will be relieved. But the honest of all ages and the future
generations will be most thankful - End of Story.

He is a slight Puck-like man, with silvery-white hair and eyes twinkling with
mischief - eyes that suddenly blaze with outrage and righteous anger, whenever he talks
of the destruction of our God-given, Constitutionally-protected rights by "regal maggots."
One cannot help but think of David and Goliath, when we consider that for twenty years
he has been challenging the massive elite power machinery all alone. His chances of
winning, of course - or even living through it - become slimmer and slimmer with the
passing of each day that these monsters remain hidden. Only two things now can save
him - and in turn, us as a nation: the help and protection of God, and the assistance of an
awakened American public. He refuses to recognize defeat - because he realizes that if HE
loses, ALL of us LOSE EVERYTHING - PERMANENTLY!

"The DC 10 was capable of flying on two engines if one of the three lost power.
The 'CHICAGO SUN TIMES' reported that the GENERAL ELECTRIC engines were
so
powerful that the plane could take off with only TWO engines operating. The situation
changes 'dramatically' if one engine falls off. The weight distribution, the aerodynamics,
changes; that is, 'the entire controllability of the plane' is lost. CAPT. ROBERT
VOGTRETTER, a United Airlines pilot said 'there is no set procedure a pilot can take
when an engine tears loose from a wing and falls off...in most cases recovery by the pilot
is almost hopeless, particularly at take off.' (5/26/79)

"The vice chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board, ELWOOD
DRIVER, centered his search for the cause of failure of the pylon that connected the
engine to the wing on a 'small, nacelle mounting bolt.' He told the Tribune that the pylon
was found among the plane's wreckage, but of six connecting bolts, ONE WAS
MISSING.

"The official NTSB report stated that 'contributing to the cause of the accident
were the vulnerability of the design of the PYLON ATTACH POINTS to maintenance
damage; the vulnerability of the design of the LEADING EDGE SLAT SYSTEM to the
damage which produced asymmetry: DEFICIENCIES in FAA SURVEILLANCE AND
REPORTING SYSTEMS which failed to detect and prevent the use of IMPROPER
MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES; deficiencies in the PRACTICES and
COMMUNICATIONS
among operators, the manufacturer, and the FAA which failed to determine or
disseminate the particulars regarding PREVIOUS maintenance damage incidents; and
the
intolerance of prescribed operational procedures to this unique emergency.'

"On May 27, 1979 an article appeared on page 2 of the 'Chicago Sun Times' under
the headline '100 Million in Lawsuits Estimated'." [1]

JOE WHITE was a DC-10 maintenance superintendent. He had circulated written
criticisms of a FORKLIFT causing ongoing engine mount damage, during engine
changes. After the crash, White maintained his management criticisms and refused to
give perjured testimony. JACK BURKE, a retired FAA safety inspector, discovered
evidence showing PRE-CRASH KNOWLEDGE by the FAA, McDonnell Douglas and
AA of
the ongoing engine-mount damage. The new evidence plainly showed that White had
been wrongfully terminated for DISHONESTY in order to DISCREDIT him as a
potential
WITNESS to AA's reckless disregard and the high level FAA coverup.And the evidence
clearly showed FAA and AA COMPLICITY in the post-crash coverup. AA and the FAA
could not risk the huge damage award and public scandal promised at trial. So the White
claim was settled, then weakened and formally settled in mid-1992, under magistrate
supervision, WITHOUT CRAIG TWEEDY'S NAME being on the settlement check, as
co-
counsel of record, nor has he received one settlement dime, to date. It was all part of the
1991-1992 plan to KEEP TWEEDY BROKE.

Now, around this same time - in the early '70s - AL AND MARILYN MULLEN
purchased 20 acres - surrounded by a flood plain - in Osage County, Oklahoma. Upon
acquiring this property, they settled down to raise their children and build a successful
trucking company. At the time of the purchase, Osage County had been maintaining the
roadway crossing of the elevated track at Mile Post 168.41 for DECADES. But, it wasn't
merely the public crossing status that was important to them: the county road and
crossing provided the Mullens and a neighboring family their ONLY roadway entrance
and exit!

So, they were unprepared for an August, 1984, assault by the Union Pacific.
WAVING GUNS, the UP ORDERED MARILYN MULLEN AND THE CHILDREN
TO LEAVE
THEIR HOME. Al Mullen was conveniently off somewhere, driving a truck. Taking full
advantage of the situation, the UP used heavy equipment to dig out and DESTROY the
public roadway approaches to the elevated track crossing. Then they deliberately rebuilt
them at a pitch so steep it would cause the Mullens' cargo trailers to hang up on the
tracks. And to make sure Mullens couldn't fight back, they threatened to sue for
trespass,
if he attempted to repair the obstructed crossing.

Eight months later, in April of 1985, the MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD, a division
of the Union Pacific [UP] tried to get an injunction against Al and Marilyn Mullen,
because
they had refused to agree in writing that the crossing was PRIVATE. [Which, of course, it

WASN'T!] The agreement would have waived the Mullen property and public crossing
rights and trucking damages. Accordingly, the UP charged Mullen and his small
CARTWRIGHT TRUCKING entity for trespassing over the UP's "private crossing" at
Mile
Post 168.41, so that they would be unable to recover damages, because TRESPASSERS
MAY NOT RECOVER DAMAGES. Naturally, the complaint failed to mention the public

crossing status, property rights and damage claims. By this time, the Mullens' cargo-
hauling business was failing from the crossing obstructions and customers frightened by
UP threats. The injunctive proceeding was stayed, but it was too late to save the Mullens'

cargo-hauling business. And, that was only the beginning of the story:

A couple of months after that, CRAIG TWEEDY [our hero] became replacement
counsel and filed cross-claims for the damage to the trucking business. By this time, the
Mullens' cargo-hauling business and income were history. And Al Mullen's wife,
MARILYN, had been forced to return to work, leaving their minor children, including a
DEAF AND BLIND DAUGHTER to the care of others. On October 7, 1985 the Osage
County
Commissioners filed an action to protect the county roadway passing over the public
crossing at Mile Post 168.41. The UP was a named defendant in this case. This action
endangered the UP's fraudulent plan and threatened to expose the UP to DAMAGES. So
UP attorneys deceived the Osage District Attorney and District Court into agreeing to a
judgment confirming the county roadway on ONE crossing approach, but not mentioning
or including the county roadway CLAIMED AND EXTENDING TO THE MULLEN
PROPERTY!

This fraudulent judgement and the OCC's inaction was all the Union Pacific
needed to persuaded United States District Court Judge JAMES O. ELLISON to render
a
decision in their favor: On February 10, 1989, Ellison ruled that the crossing was
PRIVATE
- no crossing rights existed, absent UP permission - in effect, directing a verdict against
Cartwright's valid counter-claims for damages! Cartwright Trucking became a trespasser
without crossing rights. Ellison's decision, however, was obtained by FRAUD and
therefore was void [worthless, invalid] because he had no jurisdiction and he had denied
due process. At this point, Tweedy initiated a fraud investigation.

Then, on January 17, 1990, Osage District Judge J.R. PEARMAN overruled the
1987 Osage decision, finding that the UP had used the 1987 Osage fraud to
"MISLEAD...Judge James O. Ellison."

Three months later, on March 23, 1990, Oklahoma Department of Transportation
[ODOT] testimony and maps [prior to the UP's 1984 crossing obstructions] confirmed
that
the crossing the county roadway passed over was a PUBLIC crossing, which allowed
state maintenance support. In addition, an OCC official testified to the UP letters and
actions - further confirming a public crossing status since 1974. Judge Pearman's
January 17, 1990 decision of UP's 1987 Osage fraud designed to 'mislead' Judge Ellison
was also introduced. Judge Ellison ordered a stay. But, during the stay - on April 18, 1990

- the UP's fraudulent plan was discovered.

Through the use of a fictitious name - 'Boyd Howard' - Al Mullen obtained a copy
of the UP's April 18, 1990 Management Letter and attached Public Crossing Record. The

letter confirmed the public crossing status at Mile Post 168.41, under the DOT 797-289T
number assigned to them in 1974. And it attached a computer printout of the UP crossing
inventory record showing the public crossing status of Mile Post 168.41. This
acknowledgment of the public crossing status was the recognition required by federal
law.

When discovered after the trial, the UP record and other strong state evidence was
presented for Rule 60(b) relief. But Judge Ellison closed his eyes to the unearthing of
UP's fraud on the court. It would have exposed the Union Pacific to DAMAGES and its
executives and attorneys to PROSECUTION for criminal fraud and obstructions of
justice.
By his order of June 13, 1990, Judge Ellison showed gross bias toward the UP, and
closed his eyes to the clear plan of fraud on his court and the Mullen rights. But, that
wasn't enough: he then blamed TWEEDY for the UP's pretrial discovery failures and
bogus trial concealment of its inventory records - and he BURIED the post-trial evidence
and the testimony of the state witnesses and exhibits showing the public crossing status!
Finally, Judge Ellison NULLIFIED Osage district Judge Pearman's judgment that the
UP's
1987 Osage fraud was designed to "mislead" Ellison.

Judge Ellison's disqualification was moved, while a motion for reconsideration of
the Rule 60(b) relief was filed. Although Ellison was forced to RECUSE himself because
THE MOTION MENTIONED HIS NEPHEW - ONE OF THE UP ATTORNEYS
bringing the
federal litigation against Al Mullen - JUDGE H. DALE COOK refused to reverse Judge
Ellison's denials of Rule 60(b) relief on appeal.

Marilyn Mullen's property interests were taken unlawfully and by fraud, WITHOUT
COMPENSATION. According to a partial trial transcript, Marilyn's state court damage
action against the UP and others was proper, as conceded by Judge Ellison's trial
rulings. But Ellison wasn't through: at the UP's urging, he ruled that Marilyn was NOT A
PARTY IN INTEREST, because she was not an officer, shareholder, or director of the
Cartwright Transfer company that was alleging damages. He directed that she REMAIN
OUT OF THE COURTROOM, unless called as a witness. She was even prohibited from
talking to other witnesses - including HER OWN HUSBAND - about the evidence
affecting
BOTH of their property rights, claims and financial well being! On January 2, 1991,
Judge
Cook enjoined further litigation alleging facts contrary to Judge Ellison's rulings,
WITHOUT PERMITTING ARGUMENT IN OPPOSITION. The injunction was honored
by
Tweedy and the Mullens. But prior to its issuance, he had filed Marilyn's complaint with
the OCC tribunal - seeking a judgment confirming the public crossing status. ABSENT
PUBLIC CROSSING RIGHTS, the Mullen home and 20 acre property interests
LACKED
MARKET OR MORTGAGE VALUE.

Mullen did complain to the OCC. But they did NOTHING until J. C. WATTS joined
BOB ANTHONY as an OCC Commissioner in January of 1991. Then finally, on January
30,
1991, the OCC Transportation Director filed a complaint to protect the public crossing at
Mile Post 168.41 and affirm the OCC's exclusive jurisdiction...SIX YEARS LATE!
Although
the delay was ESSENTIAL to the UP's plan, they were SHOCKED AND OUTRAGED:
Watts
and Anthony had aborted the OCC complicity. So they moved to bring sanctions against
Tweedy for violating Judge Cook's order by INDIRECTLY causing the OCC to protect
the
public crossing interest! But the magistrate terminated the hearing. And later, Judge
Cook dismissed the sanction motion.

The September 16, 1991 OCC Order confirmed the public crossing status at Mile
Post 168.41 and the exclusive OCC jurisdiction, since at least 1974. This judgment was
submitted as new authority material. The fraudulent abortion of Oklahoma law, state
rights, and due process was CRIMINAL in nature. During the oral argument, the 10th
Circuit panel asked NO questions. But one panel judge kept FLIPPING THROUGH HIS

NOTEBOOK PAGES with puzzled expressions on his face, as though Tweedy were
arguing facts OUTSIDE the record. [And, of cours, he WAS: Once again, the original
charges had been buried and REPLACED with bogus charges!] As a result, the appeal
was DENIED and the 10th Circuit Court was defrauded, again, because the panel judges
did not read the ACTUAL appeal briefs.

When they alleged that Tweedy was guilty of violating RULE 3.1 of the Oklahoma
Rules of Professional Conduct [ORPC], he denied it, claiming the allegation was
ludicrous:

"A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or assert or controvert an issue
therein, unless there is a BASIS for doing so that is NOT FRIVOLOUS, which includes a
GOOD FAITH ARGUMENT for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law. A

lawyer for the defendant in a criminal proceeding, or the respondent in a proceeding that
could result in incarceration, may nevertheless so defend the proceeding as to require
that EVERY ELEMENT of the case be established." [2]

Tweedy's actions - as we have already seen - WERE BASED ON EXISTING LAW.
Like the anti-gun laws debate, he had no need for an extension, modification or reversal
of the law. He needed the courts to ENFORCE the laws ALREADY ON THE BOOKS!
And,
of course, every element was NOT established in this case: the most critical elements
[evidence] were BARRED from the hearings! But, let's see how Westlaw defines Rule
3.1:

Tweedy's arguments WERE based on the merits and the evidence DID SUPPORT
THE ACTION. Unfortunately, both - the original charges AND the evidence supporting
his
actions - were SUPPRESSED.

"...Rule 3.1 is to the same general effect as DR 7-102 (A)(1), with three
qualifications. FIRST, the test of improper conduct is...that there be a basis for the
litigation measure involved that is 'not frivolous.' This includes the concept...that a lawyer

may advance a claim or defense unwarranted by existing law if 'it can be supported by
good faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law.' SECOND,

the test in Rule 3.1 is an OBJECTIVE test, whereas the DR 7-102 (A)(1) applies only if
the
lawyer 'KNOWS or when it is OBVIOUS' that the litigation is frivolous. THIRD, Rule 3.1
has
an exception that in a criminal case, or a case in which incarceration of the client may
result...the lawyer may put the prosecution to its proof even if there is no nonfrivolous
basis for defense." [3]

Objective or not, Tweedy knew that his charges were NOT frivolous, because they
were based on case law and existing statuatory law - in addition to the hard evidence he
tried to present.

In the case of the Union Pacific and their attorneys, they WILLFULLY violated Rule
3.1 through their intent to deceive the Oklahoma Supreme Court. When the OCC Order
of
September 16, 1991 belatedly protected public crossing interests and restored the
Mullens' property rights and values - less their once-growing trucking business asset and
income - was combined with the UP's public crossing record and Judge Pearman's fraud
decision, it conveyed certain powerful messages to the Oklahoma Supreme Court. When
Trojan Horse power is invoked [i.e., Rule 34(a) regal power over law], the "powerful
predominate, setting aside and even ELIMINATING the powerless." Translated, our
Constitution, settled law, state rights and the rights of ordinary citizens and businesses
have little meaning to the Corporate Barons - or to the Klinton regime.

What happened to Al and Marilyn Mullen was OUTRAGEOUS. It exemplifies the
danger to ordinary citizens and businesses [YOU AND ME!], when chosen for
UNLAWFUL
ATTACK. The Mullens' rights and claims were evaporated in the federal courts, and
they
were left without recourse - a situation that could happen to ANY ONE OF US! Congress
was duped from within in 1979 and 1980. And Corporate Baron influence with the major
media/AP concealed from the public internal - if not ROYAL - government power by
purchase. Worse, this pattern of inside power over our Constitution, systems of law and
ordinary citizen rights is still being PROTECTED TODAY BY JUDGE BRETT'S
FRIEND,
BILL CLINTON... This IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE is a whopper!

minority shareholders, on behalf of the family-owned BURGGRAF CORPORATION
[BC].
B. HAYDEN CRAWFORD was retained as lead counsel. BC sold several hundred
thousand
tires, annually, on a wholesale and retail basis and in several states. Essentially all of the
tires were purchased from the KELLY and LEE DIVISIONS of Goodyear. Goodyear
possessed the factory codes and related records essential to the claims. But they filed
belated and amended answers and stonewalled BC during records discovery [pretrial
investigation], claiming they were confidential [Since WHEN are a PUBLIC corporation's

records considered "confidential?" What ARROGANCE!] and the lawful investigation
was
nothing more than a meritless fishing expedition. [Discovery? A "fishing expedition?"
They MUST be Democrats!]

In any event, a DISCOVERY CONFERENCE was held on December 1, 1983. It was
at this hearing that Tweedy first heard the 'apples-to-oranges' analogy used. United
States District Judge THOMAS R. BRETT was the narrator, signaling APPLES-TO-
ORANGES PROTECTION from damage claims for Goodyear. They were complaining
that
BC had not provided "any information with regard to the [particular] sales being
complained about, where, when or to whom they were allegedly made, or what tires were
involved." So Judge Brett set the needed discovery conference for December 15; but
directed BC to "provide" the defendants with "all alleged instances of...sales of products
which violate the Robinson-Patman Act by January 23, 1984," and directed discovery to
be completed by "February 20, 1984."

BC's Robinson-Patman Act damage claims were generally alleged, in compliance
with 'NEW HOME APPLIANCES v. THOMPSON': "Only a GENERAL statement of
the facts
from which the defendant may form a responsive pleading is NECESSARY or
PERMISSIBLE." In J. TRUETT PAYNE CO. v. CHRYSLER MOTORS CORP the
Supreme
Court interpreted the intent of the Act as not requiring specific fact detail proof: 'Damage

issues in these cases are rarely susceptible to the kind of CONCRETE, DETAILED
PROOF
OF INJURY which is available in other contexts. The Court has repeatedly held that in
the
absence of more precise proof, the fact finder may conclude as a matter of just and
reasonable inference from the proof of the defendants wrongful acts...' The lower court
thought the evidence too imprecise to support the award, but Tweedy reversed because
the evidence was sufficient to support a "just and reasonable inference of damage." He
explained:

'Any other rule would enable the wrongdoer to PROFIT BY HIS WRONGDOING AT
THE EXPENSE OF HIS VICTIM...Failure to apply it would mean that the MORE
GRIEVOUS
the wrong done, the LESS LIKELIHOOD there would [be] of a recovery'...Surely Judge
Brett merely wanted a Good Faith showing. Surely he and Goodyear were NOT scheming

to abort settled law and due process by requiring detailed fact allegations...within 6
weeks, while Goodyear stonewalled...

On December 15, 1983, the magistrate authorized protective orders and the BC
Discovery trip of January 9, 1984 to Goodyear's Maryland facility. The vital records
were
reviewed for several days. BC requested several years of factory code, product code,
authorized line reports and compared invoices. Those records were received at Tulsa in
late January through mid-February, 1984. But GOODYEAR DENIED HAVING THE
MEANS
TO DECODE ITS OWN CODED RECORDS! This required several months to devise
the
computer process needed to decode the coded records by date, type and price, in order
to commence the input and printout of years of unlawful tire price damages. Good faith
compliance with Judge Brett's order by January 23, 1984. So from the few records carried

back from the discovery trip, the January 23, 1984 letter to Goodyear provided TWO
manually-selected sets of records showing probable price damage. But by his February
29, 1984 order, Judge Brett gave BC until March 9, 1984 to provide ADDITIONAL fact
detail
instances, or be restricted to the "two incidents previously alleged." This order obliquely
DISMISSED the ACTUAL claims.

After the massive volume of requested Goodyear records were received, but
before a computer decoding method had been devised, FIVE more sets of good faith tire
sales examples were manually selected and provided by the Letter of March 1,
1984...When Summary Judgment was rendered on April 18, 1984, BC had not yet
perfected its computer decoding. Judge Brett usurped power to impose the seven
manually selected examples of good faith as being the detailed fact claims alleged by
BC...obliquely DISMISSING the ACTUAL Robinson-Patman claims and Article III
jurisdiction arising under the Act! And he DISMISSED the CORPORATE
DEFENDANTS
from the COMMON LAW CONSPIRACY CLAIMS...B. Hayden Crawford...was
REMOVED as
lead counsel. BILL MUSSEMANN and DON GUY were retained as co-counsel. But the
general jurisdiction of state courts blinded all three attorneys to the federal jurisdiction
ousted on April 18, 1984...

On June 25, 1884 Judge Brett IGNORED the computer printouts of decoded
damage introduced and refused his DUTY to grant relief from his unfair and case-
crippling orders. So...Mandamus relief...was sought. It was DENIED...

On July 2, 1984, Judge Brett's...fiats [commands, orders] were called for trial. But
BC computer decoding could not match the records forming the seven fact detail
instances and nothing prosecutable existed for trial. The July 2, 1984 transcript showed
that Mussemann renewed the BC motions for relief. [In it] He explained that BC was
unable to prosecute and "show any more than a prima facie case [presumed to be true,
until disproved by evidence to the contrary] or to refute the defenses that have been
raised"...at Goodyear's urging...Judge Brett DISMISSED the case.

On February 10, 1986, the 10th Circuit Court saw 'oranges' [a different set of
claims than were filed for] and was defrauded. It refused to review the pretrial
orders...Absent the needed review, it ruled that Judge Brett had NOT ABUSED HIS
DISCRETION in dismissing moot [questionable] appearances...[However] Goodyear's
motion for SANCTIONS FOR FILING the orange-based...appeal was approved and
referred
to Judge Brett for imposition. Judge Brett gave Bill Mussemann and Don Guy a pass, but

hammered Tweedy with a $14,521.25 sanction for appealing "with subjective good faith,"
but with an "empty head, pure heart." [Something no one would ever accuse HIM of - at
least not the LAST part!]

On June 18, 1986, direct RULE 60(b) relief from the fraud was sought under
PIERCE v. COOK & CO. and HAZEL-ATLAS GLASS v. HARTFORD: "tampering with
the
administration of justice in the manner indisputably shown here involves far more than
an injury to a single litigant. It is a wrong AGAINST THE INSTITUTIONS SET UP TO
PROTECT AND SAFEGUARD THE PUBLIC. The public welfare demands that the
agencies
of public justice be not so impotent that they must always be moot and helpless victims
of deception and fraud."

In KELLY v. EVERGLADES DRAINAGE, the Supreme Court construed RULE 52(a)
as imposing the decisional DUTY to afford a CLEAR UNDERSTANDING of the BASIS
of
the decision for appeal purposes. Accordingly, in July, 1986, a Petition for a WRIT OF
CERTIORARI [A request from a higher court i.e., the Supreme Court, for a Certified
Copy
of the court proceedings to review for irregularities] and MANDAMUS [An emergency
Court Order to an officer of the court - commanding them to do their ministerial duty] was

filed, urging the Supreme Court to impose that duty on the 10th Circuit Court. Public,
constitutional and client interests were at stake, but Writ relief DID NOT ISSUE.

It all began with Lillian's job at AMERICAN AIRLINES in Tulsa, Oklahoma. During
the time Lillian worked there, American repeatedly harrassed her, in a futile attempt to
force her to quit. It seems they had made a dreadful mistake in recalling her from her
layoff as an electronics technician: L. A. Graham became the ONLY FEMALE among 4,500
aircraft mechanics at American Airlines' Tulsa maintenance! To correct this mistake and
intimidate any OTHER female employees seeking to become maintenance mechanics
through AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, she was regularly harassed and accused of things she
hadn't done. After awhile, finding this didn't work, American FIRED her, claiming she had
damaged a turbine disc in 1985.

Knowing this to be a lie, Lillian denied the charge. The original claim of unfair
termination was filed for her by her former counsel, and tried before Judge H. DALE
COOK in 1988 and 1989. Now, Amerian was so determined to get rid of her, they were
even willing to resort to fraud! So, a few days before trial, they produced Federal Air
Regulation [FAR] records of their 1995 overhaul of jet engine, S/N 644980, claiming the
records to be complete from "Exodus to Revelations." The records showed that the
engine in question had been overhauled in 1985. And personnel and maintenance records
showed that Lillian was the one who had worked on the disc during the 1985 overhaul.

During the trial on August 11, 1989, she testified that she had not damaged 4th
stage turbine disc S/N 9B6198. And the Federal Aeronautics Records [FARs] required the
signature of each mechanic performing work on an engine part. But RECORD GAPS
existed for the period of time when she allegedly had damaged the disc. American
couldn't risk forging her signature, so at the trial they claimed that the FAR record
bearing her signature for her work on 4th stage turbine disc had been MISPLACED. [Good
Gosh! Does this remind anybody of the recent shenanigans of Bill and Hill?!] In the end,
Judge Cook found for American, ruling that Lillian had damaged the disc in question, a
part removed from jet engine S/N 644980 during AA's 1985 overhaul of the engine. At that
time, American's claims were accepted at face value by Lillian and Judge Cook.

AH-HA: At this point, up rode our hero, CRAIG TWEEDY - prepared to do battle for
the rights of the helpless victims of the Corporate Barons. NOW, THINGS ARE GOING TO
GET INTERESTING! He appealed. Then, on September 8, 1989, he filed a second claim
against American Airlines and the Union Pacific in state court - but it was removed by
American to federal court. Now, the reasonable belief was that the discovery process
would force the Federal Aeronautics Administration [FAA] to produce ACTUAL and
unaltered FAR records of American's 1985 alleged overhaul of jet engine 644980, showing
that Lillian did NOT work on 4th turbine disc 9B6198 - thereby compelling a settlement.

Then began a game of judicial HIDE-AND-SEEK - with TRUTH being "IT." Craig
discovered once again that Corporate Smoke and Mirrors are able to hide just about
anything! The first appeal was withdrawn. Lillian and her friends had paid approximately
$1,300 in trial transcript expenses, but they were unable to come up with enough money
to obtain copies of the transcript - ESSENTIAL to the appeal. The federal courts had
denied her applications for the transcript to be completed at public expense, and any
hope of the truth being brought out at this point was strictly up to Lillian's lawyer. So, on
November 21, 1990, he filed an application for a discovery allowance and a stay, to enable
him to gather additional FAR records for engine 644980 from the United States
Department of Transportation [USDOT] criminal investigators at Fort Worth, Texas. No
surprise: the application was denied.

Craig knew his work was cut out for him, but he also knew something was very,
very wrong: WHO was hiding "It" - and HOW were they doing it? His "So Help Me, God"
oath to "not counsel...any suit or proceeding which shall appear...to be UNJUST"
demanded that he find and expose this illusive Goliath. Fortunately, he wasn't alone in
his quest for the truth:

While investigating three years of safety record forgeries by EASTERN AIRLINES,
OIG criminal investigative agents from the United States Department of Transportation
[USDOT] had unearthed a deadly conspiracy against the American people by - who else?
-American Airlines and the FEDERAL AERONAUTICS AGENCY! [Uh oh! This sounds
familiar!] The investigators had discovered that a claim being made by American,
concerning the overhaul of a jet engine was false: They had concealed the fraud with
FORGED ENGINE RECORDS and FAA COLLABORATION. This raised the question of
whether ex-Department of Transportation Inspector-General MARY SCHIAVO - recently
forced to resign under heat for upper-level FAA and VALUJET criticisms - KNEW why the
OIG Agents were prevented from pursuing this obvious collaboration between American
and the FAA. And WHY was Eastern Airlines forced to take bankruptcy?

As it turned out, American's boast that their FAR records were complete from
"Exodus to Revelations" proved to be more than a little inaccurate: for
November/December, 1990 revealed that American's claimed 1985 overhaul was an
OUTRIGHT LIE: it simply had not happened! ACTUAL records showed that the engine
hadn't been overhauled SINCE 1982! They had FORGED the FAR records of the 1985
overhaul, to create the illusion that Lillian had damaged the engine part in question. And
this whole elaborate scheme was constructed for the express purpose of concealing her
unlawful termination. Of course, this fact HAD to be concealed, because the truth would
have exposed American's illegal plan to INTIMIDATE FEMALE MECHANICS IN THE
AVIATION WORKPLACE! [Are you listening, Ladies?]

The most shocking revelation was the EXTENT of this deception - as well as the
incredible number of high-level individuals willing to risk devastating fines and
imprisonment to protect this conspiracy! Bearing in mind the original REASON for all this
illegal activity, the following betrayal by one of Lillian's own sex becomes even more
outrageous: In seeking to cover up the forged and fraudulent nature of the FAR records
of American's 1985 overhaul of engine 644980, FAA Safety Inspector LYNN PIERCE
knowingly PERJURED herself on her deposition. This perjury proved upper-level FAA
collaboration, so Craig immediately contacted CHARLES GERBER, the federal prosecutor
who was working on 60 indictments against EASTERN AIRLINES management. The
federal indictments were for maintenance record FORGERIES [Sound familiar?] occurring
under the noses of FAA Safety Inspectors for three years - without FAA action. Mr. Gerber
then referred Craig to the Inspector General of DOT, who was responsible for assigning
investigators. After reviewing American's 1985 engine records and the FAA/Pierce
testimony, the OIG criminal investigators then collected the ACTUAL records for engine
644890 from the U.S. Air Force - again, WITHOUT FAA COOPERATION.

Perhaps the most disturbing point - to me - in this whole narrative, was the
glaring fact that American's attorneys so obviously KNEW they would NEVER BE
INDICTED for mere fraud and forgeries! And it is this REGAL ARROGANCE that so
chillingly illustrates the power of the modern Trojan Horse [Rule 34(a)]. The intent of the
Corporate Barons was to deceive members of the Oklahoma Bar's Professional
Responsibility Commission [PRC] - as well as the Oklahoma Supreme Court.

A December 24th argument established that Craig and Jack Burke, a retired FAA
Safety Inspector, now had possession of the essential FAR records of engine 644980 -
recovered from the USDOT criminal investigators at Fort Worth, Texas, on December 17-
19, 1990. These records were then attached to the November 21, 1990 Application for the
stay, asking for additional discovery time. Two months later, on February 12, 1991, an
Application for Clarification was filed, demanding to know WHY the January 15, 1991
order was not HEARD, and why Judge Cook had not RULED on the newly-discovered
fraud. So, on February 27, 1990, Cook corrected his January 15, 1991 denial, by granting
partial relief, ruling that the newly-discovered fraud, was NOT FILED ON TIME. Therefore,
jurisdiction was passed back to the state court, where it could be. But, the TRUTH -
conveniently ignored by Judge Cook - was that NO TIME LIMIT EXISTS for discovered
fraud on the court!

Then, on February 21, 1991, Judge LAYN R. PHILLIPS granted a Summary
Judgment [An unconstitutional pre-verdict judgement, designed to ELIMINATE the need
to send the evidence to a jury. And I quote: "In Suits at common law, where the value in
controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, THE RIGHT OF TRIAL BY JURY SHALL BE
PRESERVED..." - Amendment VII], but the formal judgment plainly stated that the
summary judgment had ACTUALLY been issued by 'Minute Order' on September 20, 1990.
In other words, Phillips KNEW the truth TWO MONTHS before the discovery of
American's engine fraud! Obviously, he chose to close his eyes to American's fraud on
the court. Now, the courts are DUTY-BOUND to unearth fraud on the courts and Phillips'
grant of RES JUDICATA [Final judgement has been rendered and future actions are
barred], in the face of the newly-discovered fraud - was PROHIBITED by settled law. But,
in their regal arrogance, these judges don't seem to be taking much note of law -
apparently, they are following Clinton's lead: law is only intended to be obeyed by the
COMMON people!

So, on September 10, 1991, a third suit was then filed for Lillian . Judge Cook's
ruling that the newly-discovered fraud was "untimely" [improperly] filed and his
subsequent refusal of reconsideration meant that her case had not and WOULD NOT be
heard in federal court. He had chosen not to unearth American's fraud. But when Cook
turned it over to state court, Judge THOMAS R. BRETT and American Airlines were forced
to find a way to somehow make Lillian's claim disappear - without MENTIONING it! But,
the wording of the September 10th complaint totally defeated American's allegation that
Lillian's third claim alleged the "same points" and issues as had her earlier suits:

"...Defendants acted...to FRAUDULENTLY CONCEAL from Ms. Graham the...fact
that the Pratt & Whitney JT3 jet engine under S/N 644980 had been last overhauled in
1982, and...was NOT OVERHAULED IN 1985, and the...fact that its turbine disc under S/N
9B6198 was removed, damaged and scrapped and not reinstalled in said engine after the
last overhaul of American's two back-to-back 1982 overhauls of said engine, and
Defendant's FRAUDULENTLY REPRESENTED THAT SAID ENGINE WAS OVERHAULED by
American in 1985...[and] GENERATED PERSONNEL and MAINTENANCE RECORDS and
charges to show Ms. Graham's work on said disc...such fraudulent concealment required
and received the active concert of others, INCLUDING THE FAA..."

In the other two complaints, Lillian had claimed engine records fraud, plus gaps
or deletions in the FAR records. But in her THIRD suit, she showed that she COULD NOT
have damaged the disc in 1985, because the alleged engine overhaul NEVER HAPPENED
in the first place! Her third suit did not SEEK, nor NEED to relitigate any issues from the
other two proceedings, so it was IMMUNE from federal court injunctions under the ANTI-
INJUNCTION ACT. But, despite the immunity - on September 27, 1991 American Airlines
filed an injunctive complaint against Lillian and Craig. Deliberately avoiding mention of
the ACTUAL Graham III claim - American demanded unlawful relief from a federal district
judge at Tulsa. In turn, Craig submitted a request that all three district judges disqualify
themselves. Cook and Ellison complied, but Brett refused. [Clearly, Craig was standing
on solid legal ground, when he called on the judges to recuse themselves. And just as
clearly, Brett simply decided to IGNORE the law!]

Lillian's first appeal was dismissed in order to counter American's allegations that
Graham I [her first suit] and Graham III [her last one] were the SAME claim. Then, on
January 21, 1992, Craig sought Mandamus [a court order against the judge] relief to
remove Brett for the flagrant bias he had shown toward the big corporations - and
because he had refused to disqualify himself. It was denied.

Like American Airlines, Judge Brett deliberately did not mention the 'apple' - the
actual Graham III claim, protected by the Anti-Injunction Act from federal jurisdiction.
Instead, he usurped power and regally deemed the jet ENGINE to be the SAME THING as
the turbine DISC - creating an 'orange' - a completely different [and fraudulent] claim! By
so doing, Brett pled [unlawfully] for Lillian. He claimed that the state court litigation was
the relitigation - the 'orange.' The order was meaningless, of course, because it lacked
lawful jurisdiction under the Act. So, to cover up the fraud and lack of validity of his
order, Brett sanctioned Craig $40,333.01, claiming HE was the one who filed the
relitigation claim! Brett had substituted a false and frivolous charge for the original
charges - and then blamed the substitution on CRAIG! The 10th Circuit Court Judges
would only be allowed to see the substituted claim and the sanctioning of Craig for
bringing it. They WOULDN'T see the 'apple' - the ACTUAL claim Craig had brought. [And
they call Klinton "Slick!"] Brett had insured that the judges would NEVER learn about
American's fraud! Protected once more by Rule 34(a), the 10th Circuit Judges would see
and deny an orange-based appeal, and never know the apple-based appeal even existed!

Judge Brett had plainly usurped his power, so on May 28, 1992, Craig again
sought mandamus relief. Then - can you believe THIS?! - on June 15, 1992, American
Airlines filed a motion threatening IMPRISONMENT for SEEKING APPELATE RELIEF - in
violation of Brett's order! [So, if you turn to the courts for justice, now, YOU COULD END
UP IN PRISON FOR ASKING!] Craig attached this threat to a Petition for Rehearing.
Surely, he thought, this last outrage would gain the attention of ONE of the ten, 10th
Circuit Court Judges! But the judges neither saw, nor heard the threat of imprisonment -
or Judge Brett's apples-to-oranges orders. Nor did they see or hear any of the other
illegal actions.

On September 14, 1992, the 10th Circuit Court ordered no rehearing and
sanctioned Craig an additional $1,500 for filing "frivolous" petitions, without "law or fact"
in support. The 10th Circuit Court clearly was defrauded from within. Why? Because
[under Rule 34(a)] its judges HAD NOT READ THE ACTUAL PETITIONS. Instead, they saw,
read and relied upon 'orange'-based appeal notes prepared by LAW CLERKS! [Maybe so.
But I'm beginning to wonder if any of these golf-playing regal idiots even remembers
HOW to read law! Wouldn't you think at least ONE of them would have become
suspicious and WANT to hear oral argument? It would appear that instead of serving the
American people, they are merely serving their LAW CLERK - that would be like you and I
acting as our employee's MAID!]

As intended by the threat of imprisonment, Lillian fled in terror from the whole
mess: her claims, American Airlines, and the federal courts - where facts and settled law
had become a joke. As a little girl in Nazi Germany, she had seen people being
imprisoned for far less than seeking appellate relief! But Craig refused to bow to their
intimidation. They had flaunted Trojan Horse power over the law, and showed utter
disdain for our Constitution, the law, and ordinary citizens.

Then, in December, 1992, seven lawyers read the case and decided to try to help
Craig. They released a signed statement confirming the apples-to-oranges transformation
by AA and Judge Brett . Likewise, they took note of the outrageous threat of
imprisonment for seeking appellate relief. According to their statement:

Four-and-a-half years later, on July 4th, 1997, another letter - sent to three judges
of the Oklahoma Supreme Court - spelled it out even more clearly:

On January 15, 1993, the federal panel violated the due process rights of CRAIG
TWEEDY, by unfairly suspending him from federal court practice for a state court claim
NOT FILED BY HIM, but IMPOSED by injunctive fiats. The state court claim Craig had filed
had been for the engine-fraud discovery. It was protected by Oklahoma and Federal law,
which prohibited FEDERAL court jurisdiction. The panel, however, unfairly avoided
mention of this ACTUAL and original claim. Instead, they gave unfair and prohibited RES
JUDICATA [settled law - forbidding future action] effect to the fraud perpetrated by
JUDGE BRETT. Brett had protected AMERICAN AIRLINES [AA], usurping powers to
CREATE jurisdiction, plead for Lillian and Craig, her attorney, and commanded a turbine
disc relitigation claim be imposed as the "state court proceeding." The actual claim was
then made to DISAPPEAR in the federal courts.

Judges Brett and Ellison made up the panel majority. They refused to recuse for
predisposed bias. The lack of neutrality of Judge Brett was obvious. ELLISON was the
former ATTORNEY for AA, and the law firm PARTNER of REUBEN DAVIS, the plaintiffs.
The complaint was filed by Reuben Davis and other Oklahoma attorneys for themselves
and "on behalf of American Airlines, Inc!" [Can you say "Conflict of Interest?"]

The federal judicial panel received the written statement of the SEVEN
ATTORNEYS, but chose to ignore it, as did DAN MURDOCK,
General Counsel for the Oklahoma Bar Association.

RULE 34(a), FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, is the key to abuse
of the examination rule. Under it, Panel judges need not READ the briefs, but may honor
LAW CLERK NOTES. In select cases, tainted law clerk notes protect the abuses below. It
is as simple as purchasing [bribing] a federal district judge and appellate law clerks. This
"examination" rule [Rule 34(a)] and its inherent dangers have been rejected by the 4th,
5th and 11th circuits of the United States Court of Appeals. Those southern circuits
require their Panel judges to "read" the briefs, prior to oral argument. Such judge-read
rule complies with the public and constitutional expectations. However, it ONLY
safeguards rights in cases arising from those 10 southern states. Aren't the citizens of
OKLAHOMA and other states entitled to EQUAL protection by those under oath to the
Constitution?

The ENGINE-FRAUD claim exposed the collaboration, fraud and voidness
[invalidity], as explained by the authorities cited in the PETITION FOR CERTIORARI [S.Ct.
No. 93-1746]. The court's rule imposed AA's duty to address any perceived misstatements
of fact or law. By not responding, AA conceded the means of insider fraud on the lower
courts. Now, why would they confess those criminal insider means, UNLESS they had
purchased extended LAW CLERK FRAUD? Not surprisingly, Certiorari was denied, as was
the Petition for Rehearing. Due process violations, including the unfair suspension, are
clearly shown in the record. Add to that AA's incredible concessions and you have a
chilling picture of subtle jungle warfare on the citizens and courts of Oklahoma. When
due process protection from insider abuse of the federal court system must come from
the Oklahoma Supreme Court, the injury and present danger to this Nation and its
citizens is beyond measure!

AA and Reuben Davis led their fellow players in flaunting their abusive means of
mighty power and oppression before the Supreme Court of Oklahoma. They subtly direct
that their vested and unconstitutional means must be endorsed by this Court. If not, why
the grievance to the OBA, without mention of the engine-fraud claim? If not, why was the
suspension designed to intimidate and abort due process? The engine fraud claim
exposes a clear example of the probable depth and coast-to-coast danger to fundamental
rights.

The discovered engine-fraud claim was authorized by 76, Oklahoma Statutes, 2,
which provides that: "One who willfully deceives another, with intent to induce him to
alter his position to his injury and risk, is liable for any damage which he therefrom
suffers."

The discovered engine-fraud claim came within settled fraud exceptions to res
judicata. In Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Sunnen (1948) [333 U.S. 591, 597-598, 68
S.Ct. 715,719], the Court reasoned that res judicata applies: ABSENT FRAUD or some
other factor invalidating the judgment. "But where the SECOND ACTION between the
same parties is upon a DIFFERENT cause or demand," the judgment in the prior action
operates as an estoppel, not as to matters which might have been litigated and
determined, but "only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the
determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered." "FRAUD destroys the
validity of EVERYTHING into which it enters" perpetrated by one party to the injury of
another, the OFFENDER is liable." Nudd v. Burrows (1875) [91 US 426, 23 Led286, 290; IB
Moore's Federal Practice, Res Judicata, 0.4O7, pages 282-285] "Equity will not lend itself
to fraud and historically has relieved against it." Holmberg v. Armbrecht (1946) [327 U.S.
392, 396, 66 S.Ct. 582, 585; State Ex Rel. Burke v. Oklahoma City (Okl 1974), 522 P2d 612,
618-619]. Moreover, the discovered engine-fraud claim clearly did not seek, nor need to
re-litigate any claim, or issue decided by a federal court. The ANTI-INJUNCTION ACT
absolutely PROHIBITED jurisdiction by the federal district court. Undaunted, AA
purchased FIAT protection from the annoying engine-fraud claim and bothersome Act [28
U.S.C 2283], which provides that: A court of the United States may not grant an
injunction to stay proceedings in a State court except as expressly AUTHORIZED BY ACT
OF CONGRESS, or where necessary in aid of its jurisdiction, or to protect or effectuate its
judgments.

As below shown, AA and Judge Brett REPLACED the engine-fraud claim to
circumvent the intent of the Act, as settled in two primary decisions. In Vendo Co. v.
Lekro-Vend Corp. (1977). [433 U.S. 623, 630, 53 Led.2d 1009, 97 S.Ct. 2881, 2887], the
Court construed that the: Act is an absolute prohibition against ANY INJUNCTION of any
state-court proceeding, unless the injunction falls within one of the three specifically
defined exceptions in the Act. The meaning of the re-litigation exception, or "to protect or
effectuate its judgments," was settled in Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp. (1988) [486 U.S
140, 148, 108 S.Ct. 1684, 1690, 100 Led2d127], by the Court's construction that: [A]n
essential prerequisite for applying the re-litigation exception is that the claims or issues
which the federal injunction insulates from litigation in state proceedings actually have
been DECIDED BY THE FEDERAL COURT. Moreover this prerequisite is STRICT AND
NARROW. Clearly, AA and Judge Brett would have mentioned the engine-fraud claim, IF it
sought to re-litigate an issue or claim "actually" decided in federal court. However, the
federal court record precluded such a re-litigation finding of fact, under RULE 52(a),
F.R.Civ.P. The lack of an "essential prerequisite" imposed the Act's "absolute
prohibition" to jurisdiction over the state-court engine fraud claim, under Vendo, supra,
and Chick KamChoo, supra. The FAILURE of AA and Judge Brett to mention the engine-
fraud claim confessed the concert fraud, injunctive voidness and violations of due
process.

On September 27, 1991, Reuben Davis filed AA's injunctive complaint in Case No.
91 C-762-C in the federal district court at Tulsa. Lillian Graham and her attorney, Craig
Tweedy, were named as defendants. The complaint and brief in support avoided mention
of the sole state court damage claim for discovered fraud, i.e, AA's 1985 overhaul of
engine S/N 644980 DID NOT HAPPEN, the engine-fraud claim. Filed in September, 1991,
the federal grievance was identical to the grievance filed with the OBA. Naturally, both
avoided mention of the engine-fraud claim. Both were filed by REUBEN DAVIS,
FREDERICK N. SCHNEIDER III and KIMBERLY LAMBERT, and as attorneys, on "behalf of
American Airlines, Inc."

Thus, the injunctive pleadings and grievances revealed the plan and
EXPECTATION of abusive relief. Those documents by AA and Reuben Davis egregiously
charged the improper re-litigation of UNSPECIFIED issues or claim in state court, without
mention of the engine-fraud claim. That fact advertised the ultimate design of the
grievants to deceive this Court and impugn its probity. While the injunctive pleadings
signaled the expectation of oppressive relief from a federal judge. For the last reason,
Craig Tweedy moved for the recusal of all three Tulsa judges. Judge Cook and Judge
Ellison recused. Judge Thomas R. Brett refused. The Case Number became 91-C-762-B
Lillian Graham defended that AA did not mention the engine-fraud claim and was seeking
prohibited equity protection from the discovered engine-fraud claim. Judge Brett also
refused to recuse for his charged pattern of unfair and gross bias, plus his 1984 brag that
Craig Tweedy would not win another case! However, in No. 92-5011, the Court of Appeals
refused to issue a writ of mandamus.

At this point the federal court record becomes mind-boggling to an honest
person. It will confirm the seasoned insider means of a select player to negate federal
court function and the rights of others. It confirms sales by a district judge and appellate
law clerks for the protected purposes of fraud and judicial oppression. The Due Process
Clause prohibits judicial power "used for purposes of oppression." Daniels v Williams
(1986) [474 U.S. 327, 331, 88 Led.2d 662, 668, 106 S.Ct. 662]

AA confessed its purchase of the protective means and offensive weapons of
judicial tyranny. The insider means and plan of jungle warfare aborted law and due
process in a manner: like saying to a party, 'APPEAR AND YOU WILL NOT BE HEARD;'
and, when he appears, saying, 'YOUR APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE RECOGNIZED, AND
YOU WILL NOT BE HEARD' - a mere arbitrary edict, clothed in the form of a judicial
sentence; reasoned, aptly to this matter, the Court in Windsor v. Mcveigh (1876) [93 U.S.
274, 276, 23 Led 914, 918]

AA, Reuben Davis and Judge Brett were empowered to act in concert by the
extended concert of appellate law clerks. They claimed the mighty power and right to
make wrong right. The means preclude any fair opportunity to be fairly heard. Those
mighty means are squarely prohibited Leviticus 19:15, and Griffin v. People of the State of
Illinois, supra [76S.Ct. at 590], wherein the Court discussed the historic progressions of
due process: Providing equal justice for poor and rich, weak and powerful alike is an
age-old problem. "Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment; thou shalt not respect
the person of the poor, nor honour the person of the mighty; but in righteousness shalt
thou judge thy neighbor. Leviticus 19:15." People have never ceased to hope and strive
to move closer to this goal. This hope, at least in part, brought about in 1215 the royal
concessions of Magna Carta: "to NO ONE will we SELL...REFUSE, or DELAY, right or
justice." Such powers void the suspension and each related federal court decision, under
the Due Process Clause. It is stated in Valley v. Northern F. & M. Ins. Co. (1920) [254 U.S.
348, 65 Led297, 300] that: Courts, are constituted by authority, and THEY CANNOT GO
BEYOND THE POWERS DELEGATED TO THEM. If they act beyond the authority, and
certainly in contravention of it, their judgments and orders are regarded as NULLITIES.
They are not voidable, but simply void, and this even PRIOR to reversal.

Judge Brett confidently exercised ROYAL POWERS to create his OWN facts and
law by plain USURPATIONS OF POWER. First, he disdained the authority of Stoll v.
Gottlieb (1938) [305 U.S. 165, 171, 59 S.Ct. 134, 137] which declares that: A court does not
have the power by JUDICIAL FIAT, to extend its jurisdiction over matters beyond the
scope of the authority granted to it by its creators. Next, it is fundamental that A
FEDERAL JUDGE IS NOT AUTHORIZED TO PLEAD FOR A PARTY. The Court in Conley v.
Gibson (1957) [355 U.S. 41, 47, 78 S.Ct.99, 2 Led.2d 80 85] justly reasoned that: Following
the simple guide of Rule 8 (f) that "all pleadings shall be construed as to do substantial
justice" the purpose of pleading is to facilitate a proper decision on the merits. The March
31, 1992 injunction did not mention the state court engine-fraud claim, nor enjoin it.
Judge Brett plainly usurped power and abused Rule 8(f), F.R.Civ.P. He arbitrarily pled for
Lillian Graham and Craig Tweedy. They were oppressively enjoined from re-litigating the
turbine-disc-repair-fraud claim, which Judge Brett imposed as being the "state-court
proceeding." By judicial editing and fiats, "engine" became an engine PART, a "turbine
disc."

The powers of equity were abused to protect AA from the unmentioned engine-
fraud claim, a fraud benefit prohibited by Holmberg v. Armbrecht, supra; and Burk v.
Oklahoma City, supra. JUDGE BRETT CREATED HIS OWN JURISDICTION by imposing a
turbine disc re-litigation fraud claim as being the "state-court proceeding," which he
enjoined. He created a re-litigation exception to the Anti-Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. 2283,
supra. He did so, because Judge Cook had found Ms. Graham's 1985 turbine-disc work-
damage. Yet, Judge Cook had accepted AA's evidence and forged FAR records of the
1985 overhaul of Engine S/N 644980. Thus, one element of recoverable damage from the
engine fraud claim, by fiat, became the REPLACEMENT CLAIM operating to protect AA
from the discovered fraud. Craig Tweedy was sanctioned for the "vexatious" claim
imposed by Judge Brett, and later assessed at $ 40,333.01. Judge Brett also bragged of
his pattern of similar fiats being protected by circuit court sanctions against Tweedy in
the Sooner and Burggraf case cited in the March 31,1992 sanction. When the select
wrongdoer, its attorneys and federal judge may successfully combine to plead for a state-
court plaintiff, we have been conquered from within. Yet, as the chapters unfold, the
confessed means of subtle royalty become more appalling.

On May 27, 1992, Tweedy filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the 10th Circuit
Court in No. 92-5107. Judge Brett's pretext of jurisdiction under the Act and the sanction
intent to thwart an appeal applied the leading mandamus authority of Roche v.
Evaporated Milk Ass'n (1943) [319 U.S. 21,25-26, 63 S.Ct. 918, 941]. The Roche Court
approved writs, where the district court action or omission on its part has thwarted or
tends to thwart appellate review" and "to confine an inferior court to a lawful exercise of
its prescribed jurisdiction." Judge Brett's pretext of jurisdiction and intimidating sanction
were plainly established by the preserved record fact of the engine-fraud claim, which
was replaced. The Act, Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp, supra, Vendo Co. v. Lekro-Vend
Corp, supra, and due process authorities were cited in support.

On June 15, 1992, mandamus relief was denied. On that very day, June 15, 1992,
AA filed a motion designed to terrify and cause Lillian Graham to yield her appeal rights.
It urged ECONOMIC SANCTIONS and a conditional order of "IMPRISONMENT" for
SEEKING APPELLATE RELIEF in violation of Judge Brett's March 31, 1992 injunction. It
quoted the violated language of such injunction. The outrage of threatened imprisonment
was unabated by Judge Brett, but supported the Petition for Rehearing In Banc.

On September 14, 1992, rehearing was denied. Worse, a separate September 14
order sanctioned Craig Tweedy $1,500 for "vexatiously" filing "frivolous" petitions. The
unfair and conclusory sanction ground was that: "Neither pleading was supported in
LAW or FACT." Those decisions announced that the fact of the engine-fraud claim and
settled authorities were WITHOUT MEANING. The sanction equalled the threat of
imprisonment for seeking mandamus relief from voidness and oppression. Those record
facts red-flagged the fact and means of insider fraud on the 10th Circuit Court. Clearly,
not ONE of the 10 circuit judges had READ the petitions. They were deceived by honoring
TAINTED law clerk notes. The unfair guises of the circuit court sanction supported the
grievances. It ratified Judge Brett's injunctive sanction and brag of circuit sanction
history against Tweedy.

It was painfully clear that the ordinary right of appeal would meet the same
abusive fate. To avoid such a fate, mandamus relief was sought in S.Ct. No. 92-1070. Prior
to its denial and on February 25, 1993, Tweedy received AA's response. It provided first
notice of his January 15, 1993 suspension, 41 days after the fact. The unfairly elapsed
time to appeal the suspension was consistent with the due process violations of the
suspension. Presumably, the players acted to avoid the additional cost of purchasing the
seasoned insider means to abort another appeal.

As above stated, AA's federal grievance was identical to the grievance filed with
the OBA. Both carefully avoided mention of the engine-fraud claim. In effect, it
complained of proper opposition to the gross case abuses and fiats of Judges Brett and
Ellison. Apparently, Judge Ellison DELETED the issues arising from his case fiats.
Basically, AA and Davis complained of needing to urge Judge Brett to enjoin the
vexatious state court re-litigation, which Judge Brett, as above shown, had oppressively
imposed. The grievances bragged of circuit court sanctions. Yet, the suspension order
would brag of the circuit sanctions imposed for daring to appeal from Judge Brett's fiats
in the Sooner and Burggraf cases. Judge Brett made the same brag in the injunctive
sanction.

The panel was composed by Judge Brett, Judge Ellison and the Honorable H.
Dale Cook. Judges Brett and Ellison refused to recuse for the predisposed bias charged.
The fact of Judge Brett's bias was obvious. Judge Ellison's unfair bias was reasonably
apparent. He was the former attorney for AA and partner of Reuben Davis, the grievants.
For being "untimely" filed, Judge Cook had refused to hear the Rule 60(b) motion urging
equity relief for the discovered 1985 engine-overhaul-fraud on the court. However, in
fairness, it appears that Judge Cook did not ably monitor the facts and panel majority, a
defaulting form of unfair bias.

The engine-fraud claim aside, the APPEARANCE and LIKELIHOOD of unfair panel
bias violated Tweedy's due process rights, under the reasoning of Peters v. Kiff, supra
[92 S.Ct. at 2168]: Moreover, even if there is no showing of actual bias in the tribunal, this
Court has held that due process is denied by circumstances that CREATE the likelihood
or the appearance of bias. Those unfair appearances were confirmed by the fact of
predisposed bias toward Judge Brett and AA. The panel received, but unfairly IGNORED
the statement of seven attorneys, which exposed the gross
abuse expected by the grievants. Such statement was to the plain record fact that AA's
injunctive pleadings and Judge Brett's injunction did not mention the engine-fraud claim.
Neither did the grievance. Thus, the suspension order did not mention the state-court
engine-fraud claim, which had been replaced by Judge Brett's injunctive fiats.

The record is clear. The suspension admitted the unfair predisposition of the
panel majority, Judges Brett and Ellison, to protect Judge Brett, AA and Davis. They
intended to grossly increase the due process violations. In turn, the grievance advertised
the plan of gross abuse, now before this Court. The suspension is nullified by the due
process authority of Marshall v. Jerrico (1980), 446 U.S. 238, 242, 64 Led.2d 182,100 S.Ct.
1610, 1613, wherein the Court reasoned that: The Due Process Clause entitles a person to
an IMPARTIAL and DISINTERESTED tribunal. This requirement of neutrality in
adjudicative proceedings safeguards the two central concerns of procedural due process,
the prevention of unjustified or mistaken deprivations and the promotion of participation
and dialogue by affected individuals in the decision-making process. The neutrality
requirement helps to guarantee that life, liberty, or property will not be taken on the basis
of an erroneous or distorted conception of the fact or the law. It preserves both the
appearance and reality of fairness - ASSURANCE THAT THE ARBITER IS NOT
PREDISPOSED TO FIND AGAINST HIM.

The failure of the suspension to mention the engine-fraud claim conceded the due
process violation. The panel WAS "predisposed to find against" Tweedy. It endorsed
Judge Brett's "distorted conceptions" of fact and law. It confessed the "deprivations" of
due process. IT PROVIDED RES JUDICATA BENEFIT TO THE EFFECTS OF FRAUD AND
CONCERT - an equity benefit prohibited by Holmerg v. Armbrecht, supra, [66 S.Ct. at 585;
State Ex Rel. Burk v. Oklahoma City, supra, 522 P2d at 618-619]

Judges Brett and Ellison hammered Tweedy with the powers of the "mighty," as
prohibited by Leviticus. The suspension suggests an awareness that the appeal from
Judge Brett's injunctive fiats would be aborted and Tweedy, again, would be hammered.
The panel protected AA and Judge Brett. The violations law and due process show the
suspension and injunction to be nullified by the authority of Valley v. Northern F & N
Ins.Co, supra, [65 Led at 300]: "Courts are constituted by authority If they act beyond the
authority, and certainly in CONTRAVENTION of it, their judgments and orders are not
voidable, but simply VOID." They are not voidable, but simply void, and this even PRIOR
to reversal!

That point is affirmed by V. T. A., Inc. v. Airco, Inc, supra [597 F2d at 224-225],
wherein the Court summarized the settled authorities declaring decisional voidness for:
lack of subject matter jurisdiction plain usurpations of power, or if the court has acted in
a manner inconsistent with due process of law. The grievance advertised the gross
abuses of due process expected from Judges Brett and Ellision. The system of select
power worked, as planned. Fortunately, the fact of the engine-fraud claim applies the Due
Process Clause. It prohibits comity for the suspension, under the dictates of Griffin v.
Griffin, supra, [66 S.Ct, 556,560]: "a judgment obtained in violation of procedural due
process is not entitled to full faith and credit when sued upon in another jurisdiction.
Moreover, due process requires that NO other jurisdiction shall give effect, even as to a
matter of comity, to a judgment elsewhere acquired WITHOUT DUE PROCESS."

Soon after the appeal was commenced in 10th Circuit No. 92-5159, Lillian Graham
yielded her right of appeal in terror. As above shown, when AA urged TYRANNY OVER
LAW AND DUE PROCESS, Judge Brett delivered, with success. She ran from the
unabated threat of monetary sanctions and imprisonment for seeking appellate relief.
She had been a child in Nazi Germany, when people were imprisoned for less.

Although threatened with imprisonment for doing so, Tweedy moved forward with
his appeal to the 10th Circuit Court in No. 92-5159. While defending the Constitution and
his own rights, under his oath, Tweedy also defended Lillian Graham's rights. The
engine-fraud claim fact applied the settled authorities of law and due process powering
the Brief-In-Chief. The engine-fraud claim plainly established the (1) VOIDNESS of the
injunction, sanction and suspension, (2) the CONCERT of AA and Judge Brett and (3) the
PLAN of concert necessarily extending to 10th Circuit Court insiders.

AA confessed the stated facts and appeal grounds by its Answer Brief. Several
statements and one, in particular, wilfully disguised the engine-fraud claim: "Fraudulent
representations may consist of HALF-TRUTHS calculated to deceive." - Berry v. Stevens
(Okl. 1934) [31 P2d950, 955] The Reply Brief quoted AA's disguise of the engine-fraud
claim. It explained that AA's disguise operated to confess the appeal grounds and the
insider plan to defraud the court. Oral argument would clearly expose to the 10th Circuit
Judges the controlling fact of the engine-fraud claim. Thus, it would expose the insider
design to deceive and defraud that court.

On October 19, 1993, the right of oral argument was denied, without stating a
required reason. A renewed STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
explained why those in concert would not risk oral argument. On November 9, 1993, the
right of oral argument was denied,again, without stating why. As predicted, tainted law
clerk notes were honored by the circuit panel, who DID NOT READ THE BRIEFS. The
fraud on the 10th Circuit Court is exposed by the unmentioned engine-fraud claim. On
December 10, 1993, the appeal was denied as being frivolous, glaringly without mention
of the engine-fraud claim. At AA's urging, Tweedy was sanctioned $3,000 for baseless
arguments and filing a frivolous appeal. Disciplinary proceedings against Tweedy were
directed. Never mind that the appeal grounds of great import had been conceded by AA's
disguise of the engine-fraud claim.

The means were simple, under the "examination" rule, Rule 34(a) [F.R.App.P. See,
pages 4-5 of the Petition for Certiorari in S.Ct. No. 93-1746 filed with this Court on June
13, 1994]. Under such rule, oral argument is refused for frivolous appeals. Thus, tainted
law clerk notes showed a frivolous appeal. The rights of oral argument and to appeal
were aborted, without exposure of the engine-fraud claim. The circuit judges were
deceived, because they did [not] bother to read the briefs, but honored the notes of the
examiners. The defrauded 10th Circuit Court approved the void effects of judicial fiats
and due process violations. The December 24, 1993 Petition for Rehearing In Banc urged
the judges to act on their oath. It urged them to read the briefs and hear oral argument to
grasp the gross abuses of the law of the land.

On March 9, 1994 the defrauded 10th Circuit Court unfairly disbarred Craig
Tweedy. On April 24, 1994, the defrauded 10th Circuit Court refused to rehear its
decisions. The frivolous appeal finding, sanction and disbarment clearly evidence the
seasoned means of insider concert. The corrupt denied any fair opportunity to be fairly
heard, because THE HONEST DID NOTHING, BUT HONOR THE WORK OF THE
CORRUPT. Measured by the wounded Due Process Clause and law the decisions of the
defrauded federal courts were prohibited, powerless and void.

It is most probable that no current federal judge, or justice was on the bench,
when the "examination" rule, Rule 34(a) [F.R.App.P (Pet. Cert, pp. 4-5)] took effect. Such
rule was apparently designed to expedite the appellate decisional processes. It provides
for an "examination" of the briefs by someone, the law clerks. Panel judges are not
required to read the briefs. They may honor the law clerk notes of examination. The rule
recklessly presumes all circuit judges and lawclerks to be honest. NO SAFEGUARDS CAN
EXIST, WHEN THE HONORED EXAMINER IS NOT HONEST, BUT PURCHASED. In the
instant matter, the failure of the 10th Circuit Court to mention engine-fraud claim plainly
shows that the panel judges were deceived. They simply did not read the briefs and
honored tainted law clerk notes. They were unaware that NO GENUINE DEFENSE
EXISTED to the appeal grounds, which had been confessed by AA's disguise of the
engine-fraud claim. The frivolous appeal finding declares the nationwide danger, except
in three southern circuits. Abuse of the "examination" rule provides the quiet key to the
criminal means of select system power.

Those abuses of law and due process, plus the inherent dangers of the
"examination" rule, were explained by the Petitions for Certiorari and Rehearing in S.Ct.
No. 93-1746. The inherent dangers of the "examination" rule were rejected by the 4th, 5th
and 11th Circuit Courts. Those southern circuits (Pet. Cert. at p.5) require panel judges to
"read" all briefs, prior to oral argument. The judge does not presume the integrity of all
circuit personnel. It assures integrity. It supports the inherent reason for an appellate
panel being composed of three or more judges. It complies with public and constitutional
expectations. The judge-read rule safeguards the proper function of law and due process
in cases arising out of ten (10) southern states. However, the door is wide-open for select
cases originating in Oklahoma and 39 OTHER STATES. Select system power commences
by the case being assigned or transferred to a corrupted district judge. On appeal, the
insider concert is protected and joined by appellate law clerks. IT IS THAT SIMPLE AND
SCARY. Those dangers are increased by the several thousand cases annually [which]
seek certiorari review from the United States Supreme Court. The selection of 100, or less,
for review obviously requires the honoring of law clerk work.

The engine-fraud claim fact caused AA to confess the facts and grounds of
injunctive voidness, insider concert and due process violations stated in the Petition for
Certiorari (of record) filed in S.Ct. No. 93-1746. The stated facts of abuse included the
unfair threat of imprisonment, sanction, suspension and disbarment (Id. at pp. 11-18).
Supreme Court Rule 15(1) imposed the affirmative duty of AA to: address any perceived
misstatements of fact or law set forth in the petition. AA defied that duty and did not
settle, but defaulted. AA elected to stand with a non-response operating to confess the
facts and grounds of the Petition.

Absent "some unavoidable circumstance," the failure to file an opposition brief
should operate to confess the facts and grounds raised on appeal, reasoned this Court in
Aldridge v. Board of Education (OkI. 1905) [15 Okl. 354, 360-361, 82 P. 827; 5 Am Jur 2d
686, page 132]. In Great American Life Ins. Co. v. Stephenson (Okl, 1936) [55 P2d 56, 59],
the reasoning of this Court furthers the fact of AA's confession of the stated facts and
grounds, as follows: "Where it is affirmatively shown that a writing or document has been
brought to the attention of a party and the circumstances are that, if the party dissented
from the statements contained therein, his dissent would naturally have been manifested
by some objection, HIS FAILURE TO DENY THE ACCURACY THEREOF MAY BE
RELEVANT AS AN ADMISSION." AA effectively confessed the means of insider fraud on
two federal courts and all charged due process violations. Yet, on April 29, 1994, the
Petition for Certiorari was denied!

On July 27, 1994, a Petition for Rehearing was filed. It showed that AA had
confessed the seasoned insider means, which operated to conceal the truth, obstruct
justice and negate the intent of law and due process settled by the United States
Supreme Court. AA would not have confessed those criminal means, absent an extended
purchase of law clerk fraud. The Justices did not intend to endorse those means of subtle
jungle warfare, which selectively reign over and defraud federal court function. They
honored tainted law clerk notes and were deceived. THOSE INSIDER MEANS AND ROYAL
EFFECTS ARE NOT SUPPOSE TO HAPPEN!. Therefore, those insider means prevailed
vertically, while being bragged. Such extraordinary import and the oath to defend the
Constitution and federal courts based these certified mailings to:

It is unclear whether one or more of those officials has, or WILL act upon their
oath to defend the Constitution and federal court system from those select system
affects. It is clear that on August 24, 1994, the Petition for Rehearing was denied. It is
equally clear that the select system players had prevailed by deceiving and defrauding
the federal court system,as planned and WITHOUT FEAR OF EXPOSURE. The seasoned
means are simple as the purchase of a district judge and appellate law clerks. Those
criminal means prevailed over civil function. THE FAIR OPPORTUNITY TO BE FAIRLY
HEARD DID NOT HAPPEN IN THE COURTS OF A CIVILIZED SOCIETY! That fact is made
clear by each merging chapter of the federal court record.

The fact of the engine-fraud claim plainly exposes the fact of the insider means of
fraud and concert operating to disguise the truth. THAT FACT IS ABUNDANTLY CLEAR
FROM THE RECORD, WITHOUT AA'S CONFESSIONS. The seasoned means subverted the
judicial duty to prevent fraud on the courts, as declared in Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v.
Hartford-Empire Co. (1944) [322 U.S. 238, 246-247, 64 S.Ct. 997, 1001-1002]: "TRUTH
NEEDS NO DISGUISE. Furthermore, tampering with the administration of justice in the
manner indisputably shown here involves far more than an injury to a SINGLE litigant.
The public welfare DEMANDS that the agencies of public justice be NOT SO IMPOTENT
that they must always be MUTE AND HELPLESS VICTIMS OF DECEPTION AND FRAUD."

AA purchased insider disguises of the truth. The insider means defrauded the
courts and due process. The void and fraudulent effects were clothed with the guise of
appellate authority, says Windsor v. McVeigh, supra. Under Hazel-Atlas, the record and
the AA confessions show "far more than an injury to a single litigant." The means were
advertised by grievances and injunctive pleadings. The means caused the federal court
system, rights and the law of the land to became "impotent mute and helpless victims of
deception and fraud." AA purchased the select and royal means of "mighty" power. The
effects are nullified by the admonitions of Leviticus and the Magna Carta. Those JUDEO-
CHRISTIAN PRINCIPLES form the history and protections of our Due Process Clause,
declared one Griffin Court, supra, [76 S.Ct. at 589]. By reason of the suspension and other
due process violations, the second Griffin Court, supra, [66 S.Ct. at 560], PROHIBITS
COMITY. The Griffin authorities require an ADJUDICATION OF TRUTH, the due process
REASONS for denying comity. Such an adjudication will commence the processes of
awareness and reform greatly needed by this Nation of common men and women. The
standard for such a landmark publication is found in Jeremiah 50, v 2: "set up a standard,
publish, and CONCEAL NOT." Those powers form the Due Process Clause which
declares the suspension and other record abuses of law and due process to be "simply
void, and this even prior to" being so pronounced by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

The presented issues are of UNPRECEDENTED IMPORTANCE. They are plainly
established by the record fact of the engine fraud claim and so explained by the settled
authorities. It is clear that the Due Process Clause prohibits comity. Yet, the harsh reality
of the due process reasons is far more important: SUBSTANTIVE AND DUE PROCESS
RIGHTS ARE BEING CONQUERED IN CIVIL COURT BY THE VEILED CRIMINAL MEANS
OF THE PURPORTED SAFEGUARDERS!. The federal court insiders act in concert with
the purchaser under the guise of judicial authority. Thus, might the criminal
consequences tend to deter formal exposure by the semi-honest?

The gist of that statement is made to emphasize this point: When a state court
must protect due process from insider abuse of the federal court system, the means of
GREAT DANGER to this Nation and its citizens are all too quiet. The danger is as real and
immutable as the federal court record. The Constitution demands that THOSE QUIET
MEANS MUST BE LOUDLY SHATTERED. Here is a fitting irony. The select system players
have arrogantly driven their abusive means and effects to this Court. AA and Reuben
Davis have shown the expectation of abusive relief from the OBA and this Court. They
demand ENDORSEMENT OF DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS abusively designed to
intimidate - as they attempted to do with Tweedy.

The judge-read rule of three federal circuits ably patrols over those cases arising
in ten southern states. The citizens of Oklahoma and 39 other states are entitled to equal
protection from the select system players, under the Constitution. The grievances of AA
and Reuben Davis advertise and flaunt the "mighty" means to reign over federal court
function, the law and rights of others, with impunity. The injury to our Constitution and
systems of law transcends all published precedent. The grievances advertised the
planned hammering of the engine-fraud claim and due process rights of Tweedy. The Due
Process Clause prohibits comity. It calls for a public adjudication of the reasons. The
Constitution calls for just notice to the federal appellate judges and justices.

As above stated, AA and Reuben Davis have sought abusive relief from the OBA
and this Court. In spawning of this proceeding, they flaunt the select system abuses of
Judges Brett and Ellison. In effect, they announce that this Court must roll over and
endorse the oppressive means and void effects of the select and mighty. As additional
parties to this proceeding, AA and Davis would have a fair opportunity to show their
proper acts and motives, if any. Such a proper addition of parties would enhance the
Court's jurisdiction and protect due process fairness. It would empower the Court to
adjudicate all equitable, legal and constitutional facts, issues and matters arising from
the record. AA and Davis would be afforded a fair opportunity to advance sound and
good reasons of fact and law, if any, to explain, (1) why the engine-fraud claim was NOT
MENTIONED in their grievances; (2) why such claim and due process did not DISAPPEAR
in the federal court decisions, and (3) why they were not seeking to abuse, or DECEIVE
this Court?

ORAL ARGUMENT would assist the landmark decision of this Court. The dark
means operating to conquer us from within cannot withstand the light of public and
judicial awareness. Those unabated means quietly endanger the fundamental rights of, at
least, the citizens of Oklahoma and 39 other states. The individual liberties and economic
freedoms essential to national vitality are additional considerations. Craig Tweedy urges
the Court to refuse comity and publish the reasons why, and adjudicate all equitable,
legal and constitutional issues, facts and matters arising from the record, except
damages. The powers of Leviticus and the Constitution, plus Oklahoma law and interests,
require no less. ORAL ARGUMENT IS REQUESTED.