TIMELINE OF TREASON
APPENDIX B
IN THEIR
OWN WORDS
THE
1950s
[PART a]
"Yes, we did produce a near perfect REPUBLIC. But will they keep it, or will they, in the enjoyment of plenty, lose the memory of freedom? MATERIAL ABUNDANCE WITHOUT CHARACTER IS THE SUREST WAY TO DESTRUCTION." - THOMAS JEFFERSON
"Ultimately 'A WORLD GOVERNMENT of delegated power, complete abandonment of U.S. isolationism, strong immediate LIMITATIONS ON NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY, INTERNATIONAL CONTROL OF ALL ARMIES & NAVIES. A universal system of money...so planned as to prevent inflation and deflation.' Worldwide FREEDOM OF IMMIGRATION, progressive elimination of all tariff and quota restrictions on world trade; autonomy for all subject and colonial peoples (with much better treatment for negroes in the U.S.) No punitive reparations, no humiliating decrees of war guilt, no arbitrary dismemberment of nations. A 'democratically controlled' INTERNATIONAL BANK 'TO MAKE DEVELOPMENTAL CAPITAL AVAILABLE IN ALL PARTS OF THE WORLD without the predatory and imperialistic aftermath so characteristic of large scale private and governmental loans.
"This program was adopted
Last week [March 1942] by 375 appointed representatives of 30-odd denominations
called together at Ohio Wesley University by the FEDERAL COUNCIL OF CHURCHES.
Every local Protestant church in the country will now be urged to get behind
the program. 'as Christian citizens': it's sponsors affirmed, 'We must
seek to translate our beliefs into practical realities and to CREATE A
PUBLIC OPINION which will insure that the United States shall do it's full
and essential part in the creation of a MORAL WAY OF INTERNATIONAL LIVING'...
"The meeting showed
its temper early by passing a set of 13 'requisite principles for peace'
submitted by Chairman John Foster Dulles (Note: Secretary of State for
Eisenhower) and his inter-church commission to study the basis of a Just
and Durable Peace.
"THE NATURAL WEALTH
OF THE WORLD MUST BE DISCHARGED IN THE GENERAL INTEREST...'COLLECTIVISM
IS COMING, whether we like or not,' the delegates were told by no less
a churchman than England's Dr. William Paton, co-secretary of the World
Council of Churches, but the conference did not veer as far to the left
as its defiantly pinko British counterpart, the now famous Malvern Conference
(Thur Jan 20, 1941). It did however, back up Labors demand for an increasing
share in industrial management. It echoed Labor's shibboleth (i.e., commonplace
idea) that the denial of collective bargaining
'reduces labor to a commodity.' IT URGED
TAXATION DESIGNED 'TO THE END THAT OUR WEALTH MAY BE MORE EQUITABLY DISTRIBUTED.'
It urged experimentation with government and cooperative ownership.'
" 'Every individual,'
the conference declared, 'has the RIGHT to full-time educational opportunities...to
economic security in retirement...to adequate health service [and an] obligation
to work in some socially necessary service' (Hmmm. "Community service"
perhaps? - OL)
"Politically, the conference's
most important assertion was that many DUTIES NOW PERFORMED BY LOCAL AND
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS, 'CAN NOW BE EFFECTIVELY CARRIED OUT ONLY BY INTERNATIONAL
AUTHORITY.'
"Individual Nations,
it declared, must give up their armed forces 'except for preservation of
domestic order' and ALLOW THE WORLD TO BE POLICED BY AN INTERNATIONAL ARMY
AND NAVY. This League-of Nations with teeth would also have the POWER OF
FINAL JUDGMENT IN CONTROVERSIES BETWEEN NATIONS...THE REGULATION OF INTERNATIONAL
TRADE AND POPULATION MOVEMENTS AMONG NATIONS.
"The ULTIMATE GOAL:
'A duly-constituted WORLD GOVERNMENT of delegated power, an INTERNATIONAL
LEGISLATIVE BODY, an INTERNATIONAL COURT with adequate jurisdiction, INTERNATIONAL
ADMINISTRATIVE BODIES with NECESSARY POWERS, and adequate INTERNATIONAL
POLICE FORCE and provision for ENFORCING its worldwide economic authority'."
- "TIME" MAGAZINE [1]
Hmmm. Well, that scares ME! Let's see what else they have in mind -
IN THEIR
OWN WORDS:
***********************************************************************************
1950
***********************************************************************************
"The majority machinery of the United Nations, UNESCO, or any similar organization created on behalf of world order should be so greatly strengthened that no member country...can conceivably refuse to abide by its own power-backed decisions."* - THEODORE BRAMELD [2]
[NOTE: *One of the "similar
organizations" Brameld refers to is the NATIONAL EDUCATION
ASSOCIATION (NEA). What makes this quote
particularly interesting is that - according to Dennis Cuddy - in the next
decade (mid-60s) Brameld will be invited by the U.S. Commissioner of Education
to serve on a committee TO PLAN THE FUTURE OF EDUCATION IN THE U.S. [3]
- OL]
[NOTE: *"CONTINUING
strength"(?!) This DEFINITELY does not sound like a NEWLY-created
organization!! Remember, this report is
discussing a meeting that took place back in February of 1942. Supposedly,
the UN was not formed for another three years! - OL]
"The upper class, numerically
weak, consisted of those who owned so much wealth that they did not have
to engage in manual labor. They generally wore finer clothes to set themselves
off from the masses...
"The rest of the upper
class people joined in the American cause (American Revolution), but with
the full intention of checking later the aspirations of the average citizen
for a more democratic way of life..." - CRAVEN AND JOHNSON [7]
[NOTE: *GOOD GRIEF! as Charley Brown would say: HERE WE GO AGAIN! This phrase was taken straight out of Article VI of the Constitution of the united States of America. BUT... the second Clause of Article VI begins: "THIS CONSTITUTION, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof (in "pursuance" of the CONSTITUTION of the united States of America); and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES..." (NOT the United Nations!). California's Supreme Court will later overturn this decision. - OL]
[NOTE: *POPPYCOCK! It
just so happens that I was one of those students back then and the "superficial
opinions" of the "elders" you are so casually
blowing off, are the teachings of MY MAMA AND DADDY - and
EVERY LAST ONE OF US (as well as our friends
and relatives) had strong moral beliefs. But, THAT, of course, is your
whole problem and the main reason you find it necessary to indoctrinate
our children with your atheistic teachings. It comes down to YOU CAN'T
CONTROL THE WORLD UNTIL YOU CAN CONTROL THE CHRISTIANS! "Toward World Understanding"??
YOU POOR LITTLE FOOLS! You still don't get it: NOBODY understands the world
better than its CREATOR!! - OL]
[NOTES: Now, hold up
a minute! Let's take this in order: *WHAT "mechanics"? This was the 1700s
for
crying out loud!
WAccording to the records
of the Convention, one of the delegates, who was "a plain man" (i.e., "common")
who got his living "by the plough" (farming) and wished "to say a few words
to [his] brother ploughjoggers (farmers) in [the] house." He goes on to
discuss "a farm of 50 acres" whose "title was disputed," with a farm of
5,000 acres" nearby, "that belonged to a man of learning, and his title
was involved in the same difficulty. Would you not be glad to have him
for your friend?...These lawyers, these moneyed men of learning, are all
embarked in the same cause with us, and we must all swim or sink together.
Shall we throw the Constitution
overboard because it does not please us
alike?" he asks. ('The Debates in the Several Conventions on the Adoption
of the Federal Constitution' edited by Jonathan Elliott, Vol. II - J.P.
Lippincott Company 1907) THESE SMALL FARMERS are REPRESENTATIVES at the
CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION! And finally,
R??? ALL of the members of the Constitutional
Convention were revolutionary "radicals." They
included Thomas Jefferson, James Madison,
John Adams, etc. - in other words, the ones who were creating the
Constitution - the FOUNDERS OF THIS COUNTRY
- some of whom included the "common man"! -- OL]
[*NOTE: *Look around you. Does this description sound ANYTHING like KLINTON'S AMERIKA? Maybe it's because in 1913 our government sold America's soul to the Devil. Then, in 1946, with the establishment of the Headquarters of the UNITED NATIONS, we officially became an OCCUPIED nation (by Satan's armies. Today - thanks to the Klintons and the Media - they are now pretty much calling the shots!) - OL]:
[NOTE: *Hmm. Sounds like he's describing America today! - OL]
"The Three R's for All
Children, and All Children for the Three R's! We've made some progress
in GETTING RID OF THAT SLOGAN. But every now and then some mother with
a Phi Beta Kappa award or some employer who has hired a girl who can't
spell stirs up a fuss about the schools...and GROUND IS LOST...
"When we come to the
realization that not every child has to read, figure, write, and spell...that
many of them either cannot or will not master these chores...then we shall
be on the road to improving junior high school curriculum...For those thousands
who have neither capacity nor desire to work in those areas, the school
must provide other types of activities they can and will do.
"It's high time for
us to stop cramming these subject materials down all mouths...and I shall
now include history, geography..." - A. H. LAUCHNER [16]
[NOTE: During this same year, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were convicted and executed for passing atomic bomb secrets to a Soviet courier - at the same time that President Roosevelt and his assistant, Harry Hopkins, were aiding the Soviets through the above-detailed activities! Kinda reminds me of the spy-catchers under Klinton's watch! By the way, I just looked up "CATCH" on my thesaurus and isn't THIS interesting: the very first meaning given is "TRICK" and synonyms include "DECEPTION" and "TRAP"!! - OL]
[NOTE: *A year later, Givens was named EXECUTIVE SECRETARY of the NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION (NEA), a position he held for 17years, until his retirement this year (1952). - OL]
[NOTE: *This was used
at Waco, remember? WThis tool has been repeatedly used successfully in
brainwashing and interrogations - OL]
When the Russian Colonel
tells Jordan that a "MONEY PLANE" that had crashed in Siberia, has been
replaced, Jordan asks for an explanation. Kotikov informs him that engraving
plates and other materials have been shipped to Russia SO THE SOVIETS CAN
PRINT THE SAME MONEY THE AMERICANS ARE USING - backed by the U.S. Treasury!
Unbelieving, Jordan records:
"I was certain he was
mistaken. I was quite sure that never in history had we let money plates
go out of the country. How could there be any control over their use? 'You
must mean, Colonel, that we have printed German occupation money for Russia
and shipped the currency itself.'
" 'No, no,' he replied.
He insisted that plates, colored inks, varnish, tint blocks, sample paper
- these and similar materials had gone throough Great Falls in May in two
shipments of five C-47s each. The shipments had been arranged ON THE HIGHEST
LEVEL IN WASHINGTON, and the planes had been loaded at the National Airport
[near Washington, D.C.]" - MAJOR GEORGE RACEY JORDAN (USAF, Ret.) [24]
[NOTE: This little scam cost the American taxpayers approximately a quarter of a Billion dollars. -OL]
"Some of the other items sent to the Soviets and later described by an outraged General Groves as 'purely post-war Russian supplies,' were 121 merchant ships worth $123 Million; 1,285 locomotives worth $103 Million; motor trucks and buses worth $508 Million; tractors worth $24 Million; telephones worth $33 Million; generators worth $222 Million; and more than 2.5 Million automobile inner tubes worth $6,659,880." - WILLIAM T. STILL [25]
And what was the Soviet leader's reaction to all this largesse? According to a professor from Stanford University's Hoover Institution:
"Stalin paid tribute to the assistance rendered by the United States to Soviet industry before and during the war. He said that about two-thirds of all the large industrial enterprise in the Soviet Union had been built WITH UNITED STATES HELP OR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE." - PROFESSOR ANTONY SUTTON [26]
"The reorganization
plans of 1950 & 1952 were implemented via the Internal Revenue Code
of 1954, Volume 68A of the 'Statutes at Large,' and were codified as Title
26 of the 'United States Code'..."existing law" is constitutional and common
law indigenous to the several States. In the absence of legitimate federal
law which extends to the several States, those persons who operate under
color of law in NAME of tax only,
engage in FRAUD, OPPRESSION, MISUSE OF
AUTHORITY, ABUSE OF LAW, CONSPIRACY, EXTORTION, WRONGFUL CONVERSION, THEFT,
etc., are subject to the foundation law of the States. Venue is determined
by the law of legislative jurisdiction...
'(1) actions may issue
against bogus assessments as well as collections, and (2) º7804(b)...does
not presume that the complaining party is a 'taxpayer'...º7804(b)
preserves rights and determines the nature of civil actions for remedies
in the several States. When straightened out, applicable portions of º
7804(b) read as follows:
'Nothing in the [Internal Revenue] Code shall be considered to impair any right, [including trial by jury], or remedy...to recover any internal revenue tax alleged to have been erroneously or illegally assessed or collected...The venue of any such action shall be the same as under existing law.'
"...Due process assurances in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments do not equivocate - administrative seizures without due process can be equated only to TYRANNY and BARBARIAN RULE...
'(1) Rule 1. An exaction
by the U.S. Government, which is not based upon law statutory or otherwise,
is a taking of property without due process of law, in violation of the
Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Accordingly, an Appeals representative
in his or her conclusions of fact or application of the law, shall hew
to the law and the recognized standards of legal construction...' - 26
CFR º 601.106(f)(1)
'Even officers, agents
and employees of United States agencies are assured due process where garnishment
is concerned (5 USC º 5520a), so the notion that IRS has authority
to execute garnishment and other seizures via the private sector without
due process is clearly absurd. In the English-American lineage, DUE PROCESS
has always been deemed to mean trial by jury under rules of the common
law indigenous to the several States; THE DE JURE [lawful] PEOPLE OF AMERICA
ARE NOT SUBJECT to ADMIRALTY or ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS.
'Where officers, agents
and employees of the Internal Revenue Service are concerned, there can
be no plea of ignorance concerning the necessity of due process...:
'During the course of administratively collecting a tax, an occasion may arise where service of a levy or a notice of levy is not adequate to seize the property of a taxpayer. It cannot be emphasized too strongly that constitutional guarantees and individual rights must not be violated. PROPERTY SHOULD NOT BE FORCIBLY REMOVED FROM THE PERSON OF THE TAXPAYER. Such conduct may expose a revenue officer to an action in trespass, assault and battery P, conversion, etc'." - "HANDBOOK FOR REVENUE AGENTS" [28]>
"The proposed amendment
arises from a rather odd situation. A nation is threatened by invasion,
not by a foreign army, but by its own legal entanglements. Not soldiers,
but theoreticians and visionaries attack its independence and aim to bring
its people UNDER THE RULE of an agglomeration of FOREIGN governments.
"This is something
new in history. There have been occasions when a weak nation sought security
by placing itself under the yoke of a strong one. But, here we have the
richest nation in the world, and apparently the strongest, FLIRTING WITH
THE LIQUIDATION OF ITS INDEPENDENCE...The breach in our defenses is in
Article VI of the Constitution, which provides that
'...ALL TREATIES...SHALL BE THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND...any Thing in the Constitution to the contrary notwithstanding.'*
"At the time of the Founders, the division between foreign and domestic policy was clear enough; there was never any intention, as Jefferson wrote, to enable the President and the Senate to 'do by treaty what the whole government is interdicted(i.e., forbidden; prohibited) from doing in any way'." - FRANK CHODOROV [29]
[NOTE: *"A little knowledge
is a dangerous thing" indeed and this is a perfect example. Chodorov -
like
the globalists - is quoting only part
of Article VI. Between "the Constitution" and "to the contrary notwithstanding"
is a phrase they are trying to get people to forget: "or the Laws of any
State" As I have pointed out before, they are talking about STATE constitutions
and laws. Not the US Constitution! The United States Constitution is differentiated
from state constitutions by designating it as "THIS Constitution." - OL]
Well, that's it for this week. PART b will be posted in the "Joshua Files" in one week. Thereafter, a new column will continue to be posted every Monday (God-willing and barring unforeseen complications). We are going to be setting up a "Comments from our Readers" column soon. If you have any comments, or would like to help us (i.e., donations, articles, etc.) in exposing these snakes (before they shut down the internet) please contact Michael or me at "outlawlady@mmind.net" - Love & Godspeeed! YOUR OUTLAWLADY
[Continued in PART b]
SOURCES