Do You Know What Is Planed For Our World Tomorrow from 2001 to 2009?

Run water4fuel and save the enviroment

Ahead for your eyes and ears!

September 2008

Are both the Arabs and Jews mentioned in God's everlasting promiss? Enter Here and see for yourself!
May 18, 2001 to January 1, 2009
Bush Administration Took Appropriate Action in Response to General Threats
Americans know that President Bush when faced with credible information about a threat would act swiftly and strongly. It is terribly unfair to the victims and victim families of the terrible tragedy of September 11 for anyone to suggest anything to the contrary. Such statements are irresponsible and politically motivated.
Last summer, President Bush received briefings that contained general information about possible threats. The information was not specific. It did not mention time, place or method. These general threats were also uncorroborated. Any briefings containing specific information were uncorroborated and not credible.
The same information was shared with members of the House and Senate. Senator Diane Feinstein told CNN in July of 2001 “intelligence staff have told me that there is a major probability of a terrorist incident within the next three months.” Yesterday, Senate Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Richard Shelby acknowledged to CNN the briefings on potential threats.
In light of the potential threats, the federal government took action including alerts to law enforcement agencies, airlines, and U.S. assets overseas.
Bush Administration Takes Action
The Counter-terrorism Security group (CSG) - which brings together WH officials with officials from all relevant federal agencies - began to meet several times per week, with telephone contact between key officials several times per day. The FBI was conducting active investigations inside the US, and issuing appropriate warnings:
July 2 -- FBI released a warning message about a possible threat overseas. The warning specifically stated that while officials could not foresee a domestic attack, one could not be ruled out.
July 18 - FBI issues message on Millennium plot conviction, reiterates 2 July message.
Aug 1 - FBI issues alert on upcoming 3rd East Africa bombing Anniversary, reiterating July 2 message. The State Department issued a worldwide caution
(June 22). Counter-terrorism Security Group suspends non-essential travel of US counter-terrorism staff
(July 6). Five key FAA Information Circulars (IC) were issued alerting private carries to potential threats against airlines:
June 22 - alerted carriers to a possible hijacking to free terrorist operatives.
July 2 - based on the testimony of a terrorist involved in the Millennium bombing plots, who told of a possible attempt place a bomb in an air terminal.
July 18 - though based on no specific threat information, urges all carries maintain a high degree of alertness.
July 31 - reports that some active terrorist groups are known to train for hijacking operations.
August 16 - warns carriers to be on alert for disguised weapons.
The August 6th briefing to the President that mentioned hijacking was not a threat report.
It was an analysis of Al Qadea and Usama bin Laden that their desire to attack the US, and their preferred methods of operation. The analysis was prepared at the President’s request, in response to his questions about Al Qaeda’s capabilities and intentions to harm US interests. The analysis mentioned hijacking as a possible operation Al Qaeda might attempt.
But it did not say anything using aircraft as missiles. Rather, it mentioned the possibility that Al Qaeda might attempt to hijack a plane and hold passengers hostage to force the release of terrorist operatives, including the Blind Sheikh.
Since 9-11
President directs the FBI and CIA to begin unprecedented sharing of intelligence and cooperation on investigations.
Established the Office of Homeland Security to coordinate a national strategy to protect America and named Governor Tom Ridge as Director. President Bush worked with the House and Senate to improve our anti-terrorism laws and to give law enforcement needed tools to more effectively collect and share intelligence information.
The President now receives a daily domestic security briefing from the FBI Director, CIA Director, Governor Ridge with the Office Homeland Security, National Security Advisor Rice and the Vice President. This joint briefing helps guarantee seamless cooperation among law enforcement and intelligence agencies. Despite these facts, Democrats leaders such as Senator Tom Daschle, Rep. Dick Gephardt and Senator John Edwards have tried to play politics with this threat information by making irresponsible statements about President Bush allowing their presidential ambitions get the best of their judgment.
Today’s New York Times cautions:
“As Congressional Democrats and other Bush opponents rev up the recriminations following this week’s disclosures, they should remember that the House and Senate Intelligence Committees received some of the same intelligence reports as the White House. These included public and private warnings from George Tenet, the director central intelligence, that Al Qaeda could strike at any time.”
The Washington Post states:
“The tempest seems overblown…based on what the White House has revealed thus far, the information Mr. Bush received was very general, and the possibility of a domestic hijacking was far less salient in the briefing he received from the CIA than the possibility of an overseas attack. The administration warned airlines to take precautions. It’s easy after September 11 to insist that more should have been done.”
Washington Won't Let Israel Win
May 8, 2002
Wednesday’s New York Times led with the banner headline, “New Strategy Set by US and Saudis for Mideast Crisis.” The article cited administration sources, explaining that the outcome of Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah’s visit to US President George W. Bush’s ranch in Crawford, Texas, was a “division of labor” between the two. The Saudis are to deliver Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat to the negotiating table, and Bush is to deliver Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, starting at their meeting on Monday. The endgame, according to the article, is the establishment of a PLO state along the lines set out by president Bill Clinton in December 2000.
The Clinton proposal, which was declared null and void by the Bush administration early last year, envisioned the establishment of a Palestinian state in about 95 percent of Judea and Samaria, all of the Gaza Strip, east Jerusalem, including the Temple Mount, and the Halutza dunes inside pre-1967 Israel.
The Clinton proposal also gave legitimacy to the Palestinian demand for a “right of return,” allowing for the immigration of several thousand in the framework of family reunification.
If the Times’ report is true, (and the Times seems to have a knack for forcing events to follow its stories), it can be said that the Bush administration is quite simply following in the footsteps of all US administrations since Dwight Eisenhower’s – allowing Israel to beat Arab aggression militarily, but forcing it to lose the war politically.
So it was in 1956, when Eisenhower forced David Ben-Gurion to beat a speedy retreat from the Sinai and Gaza at the end of the Suez campaign. The president justified the uncompromising demand by promising Israel that if the Egyptians were again to close the Straits of Tiran to Israeli shipping, the US would send its navy to reopen the waterway by force. In 1967, when Gamal Abdel Nasser closed the straits, president Lyndon Johnson begged off, forcing Israel to stand alone.
After the Six Day War, which should have led to a complete political reshuffling of the region, the US again protected Israel’s neighbors.
Adopting UN Security Council Resolution 242, the US again dragged Israel along by extolling the resolution’s balance – conquered land would be returned to the aggressors, but not all of it, for Israel would be allowed to retain all territory necessary to ensure it had “defensible” borders. Promises aside, since the Carter administration, the US has accepted the Arab misinterpretation of 242 – that Israel is required to return all the lands it conquered.
In 1973, the US administration was again on hand, wresting the Egyptians from the jowls of defeat. Henry Kissinger prevented Israel from destroying Egypt’s Third Army, allowed the Egyptians to escape with honor and thus enabled the creation of the current Egyptian myth – that Israel lost that war.
The Ford and Carter administrations strongly pressured Israel to sign away the Sinai in exchange for peaceful ties with Egypt, which after 23 years have yet to materialize, although Egypt, rearmed with American assistance, now poses a military threat unimaginable in the past.
In Lebanon in 1982, the Reagan administration stepped in to save a routed Arafat. The Americans paved the way for his escape with his troops from Beirut to Tunis, free to fight another day. In the meantime, the US forced Israel to withdraw from much of Lebanon and allowed the Syrian army to remain.
And in the Gulf war, the first Bush administration not only prevented Israel from achieving political advantage, it prohibited Israel even from defending itself against unprovoked Iraqi ballistic missile attacks. After isolating Israel from the coalition, the administration proceeded to force its democratic ally to the negotiating table to discuss the transfer territory to the Arabs. When the negotiations failed to bear fruit, the administration meddled in the 1992 elections to assist in the victory of the more forthcoming Labor Party.
Although the Clinton administration served in a decade unscathed by large-scale war, but marked by an increase in rogue states’ audacity and terrorist attacks on US targets, Clinton consistently urged Israel to accept Palestinian terrorism and insisted on turning a blind eye to blatant PA breaches of its commitments to Israel. The Clinton administration’s addiction to pressuring Israel to accept Arab aggression under the guise of peacemaking led to unprecedented meddling in Israel’s internal politics. The end result could be seen in the twin pictures of Clinton impertinently announcing his peace plan after his successor had already been elected, and Madeleine Albright chasing after Arafat outside the US Embassy in Paris in a vain attempt to get him to return to the negotiating table he had just overturned.
The refusal of successive administrations to locate the US Embassy in Jerusalem, Israel’s capital, is not simply an indignity, but another example of how the US has consistently prevented Israel from gaining any political advantage from its military victories against Arab aggression.
Why has the US treated Israel so shabbily? Mainly because it can get away with it. After all, Israel has no other diplomatic outlet, given that the American people is not as cynical as the State Department. Throughout this history, the US has justified denying its democratic ally the fruits of its military victories against despotic aggressors “in the interests of peace.” This policy has never brought peace, nor has it engendered stability. Rather, just as feeding the beast acts not to placate it but to strengthen it, so US placation of the Arab world at Israel’s expense has legitimized Arab rejection of Israel.
Never having to worry about losing irrevocably in their wars against Israel, rogue states like Syria, Iraq, and Iran ostentatiously build up non-conventional capabilities to destroy Israel. For their part, supposedly moderate regimes, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, are free to inspire as much anti-Israeli and anti-American sentiment as they wish, knowing there will never be a serious price to pay, even if this hatred foments a war they will lose.
Today Bush, perhaps to a degree even greater than his predecessors, has sole power to determine which side will emerge victorious from the current Palestinian terrorist war against Israel.
And what would a much maligned and dreaded Israeli political victory over the current terrorist war look like? First and foremost, it would see Arafat’s physical disappearance from the scene and the dismantling of his Palestinian Authority as a political and military organization. Just as in Afghanistan today and hopefully in Iraq in the near future, the US has and will set up friendly, quasi-democratic governments, so Israel, or the US, would set up a new Palestinian government, committed to coexistence with Israel and the provision of political and economic freedom to the Palestinian people. Although sovereignty would not be promised, the chances of sovereignty being achieved, naturally and peacefully, would be greatly enhanced if the Palestinian people is allowed to develop democratic institutions and economic prosperity.
There is nothing wrong, immoral, imperialistic, or even anti-Palestinian about this plan. In fact, it would allow the Palestinians the opportunity to reconstitute their civil society after eight years of living under a corrupt dictatorship, which impoverished and subjugated them and told them to value murder more than life.
The only thing wrong with this plan is that it allows Israel to win this war politically.
In seemingly siding with the Saudis over Israel, the Bush administration has opted for the status quo, even though the status quo has failed repeatedly. On September 11, the US was attacked by the consequences of the status quo. Decades of hatred of the US, fuelled by despotic, US-backed regimes, which have seen the value of US guarantees as successive administrations have sold Israel out to Arab pressure, empowered al-Qaida to strike. The belief that today, the US is again preventing Israel from defeating the PA, has made Arafat stronger than he ever was before. It should have been clear by now that the Palestinian terrorist war against Israel, supported by Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, and Syria, together with al-Qaida’s war against the US – backed by the same governments – have rendered the status quo not only destined to failure, but also dangerous to US interests.
Given the almost schizophrenic nature of the US administration’s Middle East policies, it is still anybody’s guess what Bush will decide to do. One thing is certain though: For the US to be able to win its war on Islamic terrorism, Israel must be allowed to win its war on Palestinian terrorism, both militarily and politically.

The Case Against Yasser Arafat Any fair court would convict him of murder, Harvard law professor writes by Alan M. Dershowitz - May 6, 2002
There are two distinct questions that will certainly be raised when Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and U.S. President George W. Bush meet this week. The first is factual: Is Yasser Arafat a mass murdering terrorist with the blood of thousands of civilians on his hands? The second question is one of policy: Should Israel negotiate with Arafat who, regardless of whether he is a terrorist, is also the elected leader of the Palestinian people? Sharon believes that the answer to the first question is yes and that it necessarily follows from this answer that the answer to the second question must be no. Bush wants the answer to the second question to be yes, and so he insists -- as U.S. national security advisor Condoleezza Rice has put it -- "I don't think we get anywhere by calling Yasser Arafat a terrorist." Indeed, if the U.S. were to call Arafat a terrorist, under the terms of the Bush doctrine, its hands would be tied. It could not deal with him because the Bush doctrine requires that the U.S. treat all terrorists as enemies to be defeated.
There is, of course, a third alternative: To recognize the factual reality that Arafat is a brutal terrorist who has relied on the deliberate targeting of innocent civilians from the very beginning of his career and who continues to do so today, while at the same time recognizing that it may be necessary to negotiate even with mass murderers in order to achieve peace.
The evidence that Arafat is a mass murderer is overwhelming and is beyond reasonable dispute. As a criminal law professor and a practicing criminal defence lawyer for nearly 40 years, I can attest, with absolute certainty, that there is enough evidence against Arafat to assure his conviction of first degree murder and conspiracy to commit murder in any fair legal system anywhere in the world.
The evidence includes his own words, both oral and written, the eyewitness testimony of close associates and an overwhelming amount of documentary and circumstantial evidence.
Were Arafat a mafia don or a drug kingpin he would be spending the rest of this life in prison. On the facts currently available, the case against Arafat is far more compelling than the case against Osama bin Laden, both in terms of the quality and quantity of the evidence, and in terms of the number of deaths for which their organizations are responsible.
Here, in a nutshell, is the prosecution's case against Yasser Arafat:
Arafat's involvement with terrorism began even before Israel occupied a single inch of Palestinian territory. He began as an Egyptian terrorist, complicit in the arming of Fedayeen, who crossed the border from Egyptian-occupied Gaza into Israel to attack civilian targets. In 1968, a year after Israel's victory in the six-day war, Arafat became the father of international terrorism by directing a campaign of airplane hijackings which targeted not only El-Al but the airlines of virtually every European nation. These airplane hijackings were designed to bring attention to the Palestinian cause. Hundreds of commercial travellers were killed. In 1972, the Palestinian leadership decided to escalate its terrorism by attacking the Israeli Olympic team in Munich. Although the attack was masterminded by Mohammed Oudeh, a one-time associate of Arafat, Oudeh publicly stated that "Arafat was briefed on the scheme." Several months after the murder of the 11 Israelis in Munich, Arafat personally planned the kidnapping of two American and one Belgian diplomat in Khartoum, Sudan. Unbeknownst to Arafat, the United States intercepted a direct communication between Arafat and his operatives in the Khartoum office of al-Fatah. There exists a tape of that intercept, and of Arafat giving the direct order to murder the diplomats, one of whom was the highest ranking African-American in the American diplomatic corps. The Arafat-ordered murders were so brutal that the races of the victims could not be determined by direct observation. Two months after these murders, Arafat excitedly bragged about his involvement in them to Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceausescu at a dinner attended by Lt. General Ion Mihai Pacepa, who subsequently defected to the United States and debriefed U.S. officials about the Arafat confession. There is no statute of limitations on murder and on the basis of the Khartoum case alone, Arafat could now be convicted of first-degree murder, based on his own recorded words.
Shortly after the Khartoum killings, the Palestinian leadership once again ratcheted up its violence, this time targeting Jewish houses of prayer around the world. It targeted synagogues in Paris, Vienna, Brussels, Rome and Istanbul, killing dozens of Jews who had no connection with Israel. These killings were reminiscent of the Klu Klux Klan bombings of churches a few years earlier. In 1982, I wrote an op-ed piece in the New York Times calling for an international investigation of these synagogue attacks in order to determine the role of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, and its leader Yasser Arafat. No such investigation was ever conducted.
Terrorism continued as the tactic of choice by the Palestinian Authority until the early 1990s, when Arafat appeared to have renounced terrorism in favour of negotiations. This apparent renunciation earned Arafat a share of the Nobel Peace Prize. At the end of the Clinton administration, it looked like peace between Israel and the Palestinians was in hand. Israel's dovish Prime Minister Ehud Barak offered the Palestinians a state, control over the Arab section of East Jerusalem and the Temple Mount and more than 90% of the disputed territories. Instead of either accepting this offer or continuing to negotiate for a better deal, Arafat returned to his tried and true method of targeting innocent civilians.
As one observer recently put it: "The difference between Anwar Sadat and Yasser Arafat is that Sadat used war as a tactic and peace as a strategy, whereas Arafat has always used peace as a tactic and terrorism as a strategy."
Recently, Israel released documents which, if authentic, conclusively prove that Arafat has remained complicit in the premeditated murder of civilians, including children. These documents, captured during the recent Israeli military incursion into the Palestinian Authority, contain the sort of evidence traditionally used to convict organized crime capos and drug conspirators. The documents contain Arafat's signature on payment vouchers to terrorists and for the purchase of material that could only be used in acts of terrorism. They also include authorization and payment to a commander who was known to have participated in suicide bombings of Jews attending a bat mitzvah in Hadera. Arafat personally wrote in his own hand an authorization to pay him and other terrorists: "Allocate $600 to each of them."
These documents have been compiled by Israeli authorities into a briefing book which will be presented to President Bush. If and when they are authenticated, the world will see a paper trail conclusively proving that Arafat is a murderer.
There are some who argue that Israelis, too, have killed civilians. But there is a world of difference, both legally and morally, between the deliberate targeting of innocent civilians and the incidental killing of civilians who are being used as shields and camouflage to hide terrorists.
All of this does not answer the important question of whether Israel should negotiate with Arafat. Reasonable people can differ as to the proper policy with regard to dealing with terrorists. But no reasonable person can now believe that Arafat is anything but a terrorist.
To argue that Israel must negotiate with a terrorist because he is the elected leader of the Palestinian people is a knife that cuts both ways: It also supports the conclusion that the Palestinian people, at least those who voted for Arafat knowing that he is a terrorist, are morally complicit in his terrorism.

April 28, 2002
Biological attack poses real threat, experts say
Risk is believed to be that civilians will be the target

The terrorist attack that experts most fear would not be seen, heard or felt.

It would ease its way through a city, taking lives without causing even a hiccup in the daily routine. Days afterward, doctors might begin to notice patients with curious complaints who aren't getting better. Eventually, health officials would realize they were treating victims of bioterrorism.

"It's not a question of 'if,' it's a question of 'when,' " said Dr. Donald Henderson, head of the Johns Hopkins Center for Civilian Biodefense Studies in Baltimore.

Dr. Henderson and others have come to believe that civilians, not the military, are most vulnerable to a bioterrorist attack. Unlike soldiers, civilians are generally unprotected and might offer an easier target. And an anonymous terrorist would not run the risk of retaliation from one of the most advanced militaries in the world.

Unfortunately, nature has provided agents that, with the right tinkering, might be turned into weapons that are invisible and untraceable.

Last month, Dallas became one of several cities to apply for a share of $158 million in federal money to prepare for a biological attack. It is the first time the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has received funding specifically aimed at responding to bioterrorism. Unlike other disasters, which are met with swarms of sirens and flashing lights, a biological assault might show itself earliest on emergency room gurneys.

The likelihood of such an attack in the United States "is not large, but it's not zero," said Dennis Perrotta, chief of the epidemiology bureau at the Texas Department of Health in Austin.

And the consequences could be devastating, he said, no matter how prepared a city might be. "If this occurs, we will lose people," said Dr. Perrotta, who served recently on a special committee on biological and chemical terrorism assembled by the National Academy of Sciences.

A tough task

The good news, so far, is that bioterrorism doesn't appear to be easy to pull off. And not just any microbe would lend itself to the job.

"We would rate, at the top of the list, smallpox and anthrax as the two organisms we fear the most," Dr. Henderson said. Both spread readily through the air, both are relatively easy to grow, and both can cause widespread disease.

Anthrax is caused by the bacterium Bacillus anthracis. In the soil, it forms a tough spore that can persist for years. Cattle and other grazing animals are the rare natural victims of anthrax when they accidentally ingest spores from the ground.

Although the anthrax bacterium can infect people several ways, it is most lethal when inhaled. When these spores are dried and left in a concentrated powder, they are breathable. In an unintentional human experiment, a secret Soviet biological weapons plant accidentally released such "aerosolized" anthrax in 1979 in Sverdlovsk. Although the breach lasted only hours, a northerly wind carried a narrow plume of bacteria across the city. At least 77 people became ill, and only 11 survived. Sheep and cows up to 30 miles away also died.

An investigation found that the devastation was caused by, at most, a gram of anthrax - less than the weight of a dollar bill. A World Health Organization report estimated that if an airplane released 50 kilograms, or just over 100 pounds, of anthrax spores upwind over a city of 500,000, about 220,000 people would become ill.

But a person probably couldn't just whip up an anthrax aerosol in the basement, said Dr. Philip Brachman, a medical epidemiologist at the Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University in Atlanta. "You'd have to really know what you were doing to be able to develop an aerosol," Dr. Brachman said. "It would take an unusual bit of equipment."

Outside the United States, at least one terrorist group has tried and failed. Eight or nine times between 1990 and 1995, the Japanese cult Aum Shinri Kyo attempted to spray aerosolized anthrax bacteria, as well as the toxin that causes botulism, from rooftops or vehicles in metropolitan Tokyo. (This surfaced during the cult's trial for the 1995 chemical attack with sarin gas.) The anthrax particles merely dropped to the ground.

A powder would also need some nudging to be inhaled, Dr. Brachman said, referring to a string of hoaxes in which people have sent envelopes of "anthrax," informing the recipients that they have just been exposed.

"If somebody pulled out an envelope, and to the desk fell some white powder, you'd have to put your nose down on the desk and sniff it" to risk inhalation-induced anthrax, Dr. Brachman said.

Furthermore, if the powder remained undisturbed, people farther away wouldn't be in any danger. Anthrax is not spread person to person.

But smallpox is.

An old idea

The idea of using smallpox as a weapon reportedly dates at least to the French and Indian War in the mid-1700s, when British soldiers sent blankets from a smallpox hospital to American Indians.

"Smallpox, if it got started, could continue to spread," said Dr. Robert Shope of the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, who was also a member of the National Academy of Sciences committee. A person can be infected with the smallpox virus for two weeks without knowing it, all the while infecting others.

The disease has no cure, and about 30 percent of victims die.

In 1967, a year when 10 million to 15 million people were stricken with the disease, world health authorities began an eradication campaign. Thirteen years later, the disease was conquered and all vaccination stopped. By official accounts, only two frozen stocks of smallpox virus remain. One is housed at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta and the other in Russia.

Recently, however, reports of unofficial stashes of smallpox have shaken experts in terrorism and international intelligence. In 1992, Ken Alibek, a former first deputy chief of research and production of the Russian biological weapons program, defected to the United States. He describes smallpox stashes hidden throughout Russia.

"What other governments saw as a medical victory, the Kremlin perceived as a military opportunity," Dr. Alibek writes in his recent book Biohazard, about the Soviet biological weapons program. "A world no longer protected from smallpox was a world newly vulnerable to the disease."

Even vaccinated adults would not be protected, because the immunity fades over time. With the Russian economy in ruins, Dr. Alibek and others worry that the fruits of Russian smallpox weapons experiments, as well as the scientists who performed them, might be for sale.

"The disastrous economic conditions in Russia have driven many of our brightest scientists and technicians to seek work wherever they can get it," Dr. Alibek writes.

Other threats

Smallpox and the anthrax bacterium aren't the only agents that haunt bioterrorism experts. The organisms that cause bubonic plague, a bacterial infection known as tularemia and other microbes are just as capable of causing disaster.

However, some scientists are wary of placing too much emphasis on any one disease. The failure of the wealthy Aum cult, despite its best efforts to engage in bioterrorism, is perhaps a demonstration that the technical hurdles are not small.

"The one [large-scale] attack we've had has been salmonella," said Dr. Ronald Atlas of the University of Louisville, who is chairman of the American Society for Microbiology's task force on biological weapons. "More likely I think you'd see that sort of low-tech attack."

The salmonella incident, which occurred in Oregon in 1984, caused 751 people to become ill after 10 salad bars were sprinkled with the bacterium Salmonella typhimurium. Members of a religious commune had contaminated the restaurants to incapacitate voters before a county election.

Dallas has experienced a similar, but smaller, bioterrorist attack: In 1996, a lab worker at St. Paul Medical Center dumped shigella bacteria on her co-workers' breakfast pastries, making 12 people sick. She pleaded guilty in the case last year and was sentenced to 20 years in prison.

"I think it's very easy to make other people sick," Dr. Atlas said. "I think it's very hard to cause mass casualties."

Dr. Henderson, of Johns Hopkins, acknowledges that the scariest organisms would be the hardest to use. But he fears that many terrorists, like Aum Shinri Kyo or those sponsored by exiled Saudi millionaire Osama bin Laden, are organized enough and rich enough to be a concern.

"I don't think it's going to be some yahoo from Montana that's going to get involved in this," he said. "It's become apparent that there are between 10 and 15 countries that are involved in developing bioweapons. They could use surrogates [other terrorists] to disperse them."

He and others who talk about bioterrorism say they are not out to scare the public.

"There are some who maintain that discussing the subject will cause needless alarm," Dr. Alibek states. "But existing defenses against these weapons are dangerously inadequate, and when biological terror strikes, as I'm convinced it will, public ignorance will only heighten the disaster. The first step we must take to protect ourselves is to understand what biological weapons are and how they work."

How long will it be before the UN Police will be in charge in the USA? April 24, 2002
United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan issued his Millennium Report to prepare "the largest single gathering of Heads of State and/or Government ever held in the world" for global governance, a euphemism for world government.

After five years of planning, the UN Millennium Summit will be held September 6-9 at the UN headquarters in New York, the day after the commencement of the UN Millennium Assembly. The UN claims that it will provide "a historic opportunity to agree on a process for fundamental review of the role of, and challenges facing the United Nations in the new century." The UN proposes to do nothing less than "chart a course for the world's peoples in the first decades of the new millennium."

Originally proposed by the UN Commission on Global Governance in its 1995 report entitled, Our Global Neighborhood, the plan was accepted in the 1997 Track II–Reform a the United Nations report by Annan. The secretary general called for the General Assembly in 2000 to be "convened as a special ‘Millennium Assembly’ with a summit segment at which heads of Government could come together to articulate their vision of prospects and challenges for the new millennium and agree on a process for fundamental review of the role of the United Nations."

Both Our Global Neighborhood and the Track 2–Reform at the United Nations call for a total, top-to-bottom restructuring of the UN to enable it to administer global governance. Many of these restructuring changes have already been implemented, but Annan claimed in 1997 the UN must be provided "with greater authority through Charter revisions" to make it truly effective. In his Track 2 report he called for creating a "Special Commission, at the ministerial level" to make recommendations for a new Charter at the 2000 UN Millennium Summit. That plan never materialized, and instead a series of regional conferences were held in 1999 to obtain input from governments and Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs).

We the Peoples

Secretary General Kofi Annan released the Millennium Report on the United Nations in the 21st Century on April 3, 2000. Called We the Peoples, the report begins by claiming that "The benefits of globalization are obvious: faster growth, higher living standards, new opportunities. Yet a backlash has begun, because these benefits are so unequally distributed, and because the global market is not yet underpinned by rules based on shared social objectives." Annan claims this unconstrained globalization is beginning to "generate a backlash," as evidenced in "last November’s World Trade Organization meeting in Seattle."

What Annan did not say, however, is that the NGO Seattle riots and the ones that occurred at Davos Switzerland in late January, at Bangkok in mid February and at Washington DC in mid-April are no accident. Annan knows it. A week after the Seattle riots Annan was in Montreal at the World Civil Society Conference telling many of the very same NGOs that rioted in Seattle that "I see a United Nations keenly aware that if the global agenda is to be properly addressed, a partnership with civil society is not an option, it is a must.... I see a United Nations which recognizes that the NGO revolution...is the best thing that has happened to the [UN] in a long time."

As is usual for the UN, Annan's report is very vague in its language, overly optimistic in its goals, short on substance, and drastically distorts its true intent—to restructure the UN into a world government.

That is not what Annan claims, however. Global governance, he insists, is not a "world government of centralized bureaucratic behemoths trampling on the rights of people and states." "Nothing," he claims, "is less desirable." Instead, he avows that it is a loose group of international "decision-making structures" which articulates and advances the "cause of common humanity." On the other hand, "Global civilization," claims Annan, must be driven by a "robust international legal order" within the "principles and practices of multilateralism." (Bold added)

What Annan doesn’t say is that the definition for government in the Webster's New World Dictionary is "the exercise of authority over a state...," "the right, function, or power of governing," or "a system of political administration by which...nation[s]...[are] governed." Governance, according to Webster, is "the act, manner, function, or power of government." With Annan's doublespeak, dung magically becomes a rose.

One of the first tasks of the UN once it has the power to govern is to "to adopt the target of halving the proportion of people living in extreme poverty, and so lifting more than 1 billion people out of it, by 2015" by "ensuring that people in all developing countries can benefit from globalization." This will be done, according to the report, by "rich countries... opening their markets to poor countries’ products," providing them with " deeper and faster debt relief," and giving " more and better focused development assistance."

Not all third world nations receiving development assistance have been successful, however. Corrupt governments almost guarantee failure. Annan affirms that "economic success depends in considerable measure on the quality of governance a country enjoys. Good governance comprises the rule of law, effective State institutions, transparency and accountability in the management of public affairs, respect for human rights, and the participation of all citizens in the decisions that affect their lives." A casual reader would believe that this is what the UN is creating. But, it is not. The emerging global governance exhibits none of these foundational principles to good government. Nowhere, in any UN or NGO document is there any mention of a structure of governance that would permit real checks and balances to absolute power. There will be absolutely no direct accountability to the people governed.

Instead, the "emerging global legal order," is based upon signing and ratifying "international treaties and conventions." Hence, one of the purposes of the Millennium Summit will be to allow world leaders to sign a variety of treaties while they are attending. Annan is especially pushing the ratification of the International Criminal Court (ICC) to "bring to justice," he claims, "those responsible for crimes against humanity." Yet, numerous studies have revealed that the ICC has absolutely no checks and balances. Its judges can bring charges against any citizen or elected official for anything they deem as a crime against humanity. The accused is guilty until proven innocent, and the court's jurisdiction is superior to national courts. It is the perfect tool to coerce elected officials and citizens alike to toe the UN line.

In addition to poverty, Annan notes that most recent wars have been internal with high civilian casualties. Driven by "politics, greed and ethnic or religious hatreds," these wars are fueled, he claims, "by a hyperactive and in large part illicit global arms market." "In the wake of these conflicts," he contends, "a new understanding of the concept of security is evolving." Not security from "external attack", but rather security "of communities and individuals from internal violence."

The solution to all of this, of course, is UN control. Annan insists that "international humanitarian and human rights laws" must be reasserted. To enforce them, he contends, "the Security Council has a moral duty to act on behalf of the international community." In other words, the UN should intervene militarily like NATO did in Kosovo. But Annan laments that the UN cannot do this job the way it is presently structured. He implies that the UN needs its own army for peace making/keeping purposes. Even so, small arms "endanger peacekeepers and humanitarian workers" and benefit terrorists and "perpetrators of organized crime." Of course, Annan's one-dimensional solution is gun control and the time-honored practice of all tyrants, the establishment of a global police state.

The greatest justification for global governance, according to Annan, is the need to protect the environment. "Earth's atmosphere is warming at an increasing rate," he warns. The hottest 14 years since systematic measurements began in the 1860s have all occurred in the past two decades." Yet, the data used in the report to support his claim is a compilation from a highly suspect database whose temperature records are corrupted by a variety of sources. The best temperature data to date is from satellites which can measure the earth's temperature to 0.01 ^oC. This data shows no warming at all since 1979. Over 17,000 verified scientists in the U.S. have signed a petition saying that there is insufficient evidence of global warming for a treaty to be passed.

Nonetheless, Annan calls for the immediate ratification of the Kyoto Protocol, which he claims will reduce the global carbon dioxide (CO₂) to "5 per cent below 1990 levels." However, because only the industrialized nations are bound by the treaty, leaving developing nations free to increase their emissions, the Kyoto Protocol is not designed to accomplish any CO₂ reduction. While the U.S. must reduce its projected energy requirements by over 30 percent by 2012, nations like Mexico, Brazil, China and others can increase their energy use at will. The Kyoto Protocol is nothing more than the greatest income redistribution plan ever conceived in the mind of a socialist. In the process, it will destroy the U.S. as an economic powerhouse.

Annan would also create what is called "green accounting" to integrate the environment into "mainstream economic policy" to make sure all human activity and development is "sustainable." Green taxes would be imposed on those that the UN considers "polluters" based on a completely arbitrary formula that somehow is supposed to measure the degree of impact a human activity or development theoretically imposes on the environment. In other cases, nations would be required to impose appropriate regulations to maintain certain standards set by the UN. To ensure that everyone is forced to follow a new earth ethic, the Earth Charter has recently been completed that establishes just such an ethic. This ethic will be put into law in 2002 with the introduction of a new treaty called the Covenant on the Environment and Development.

While we do face environmental problems, nearly all of them are caused by corrupt, repressive governments that have no concern for the plight of either their people or the environment. Incredibly, the one thing that can help solve the world's water and food shortage problem is increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere—the very thing global governance will reduce. Much research has shown that a doubling of CO₂can increase crop and forest production by up to 50 percent, and can dramatically increase the drought tolerance of crops so that they can grow with less irrigation. Yet, Annan and global governance seek to reduce the very thing that could save the world! It is diabolical.

Annan seeks through global governance to destroy the very things that have been proven to protect the environment: national economic wealth, property rights and human ingenuity. The UN’s solution to the world’s problems is to bring every human being under the control of the UN. The root causes of poverty, war, and environmental destruction are greed, power, hatred and corruption. These are issues of the soul and spirit. Although they can be curtailed at the point of a gun, no amount of governance can ever change it. Only God can do that by changing the heart.

The role of NGOs

Global governance will not come upon us suddenly during the dual meetings of the Millennium Assembly and Summit this September. Global governance has been encroaching for decades. Rather, the Millennium Summit will likely mark the public debut of UN global governance across trans-national boundaries. The Millennium Assembly is a special name for the fifty-fifth session of the United Nations General Assembly that commences on September 5, 2000. The Millennium Summit, on the other hand, is a meeting of all the heads of state in the world and starts on September 6. Its purpose is to determine the role of the UN in the twenty-first century.

The implementation of global governance has been gradually underway for decades as the sovereignty of individual nations around the world has been systematically eroded. Within nations all of the pieces of global governance have been carefully put into place, ensuring the final transfer of power to a centralized, global government in the not too distant future.

The UN agenda is already firmly entrenched in the American landscape in such things such as gun control, sustainable development and federal land grabs that will eventually claim well over 100 million acres of private property with the balance controlled through regulation. Federal programs such as the American Heritage Rivers Program, Clean Water Action Plan, Ecosystem Management, Sustainable America, Global Warming and many, many more, effectively circumvent Constitutional law by transferring power from elected representatives to non-elected bureaucracies and Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs). All of these are done in the name of satisfying the requirements of numerous treaties and international agreements—even when they have not been approved by Congress.

At the same time the global educators have implemented the occult-based Goals 2000 to dumb-down and prepare our children to be unquestioning global citizens. UN taxing authority merely awaits a new UN Charter. Finally, with the International Criminal Court in place and a permanent, standing army in the works, the UN is poised at the threshold of having the enforcement muscle it needs to back its policies and retain centralized control.

Before the Millennium Summit takes place, however, the inaugural meeting of a new UN Millennium Forum of "Civil Society" will be held May 22-26 in New York. Civil Society is nothing more than globally-oriented special interest non-governmental organizations seeking to violently force their collective agenda onto the world through protests and riots. So far there have been three protests and riots by NGOs. The first in Seattle late last year was against the WTO. The second was in Davos, Switzerland, early this year against the World Economic Forum, and the third was in Bangkok, Thailand, in mid-February at the UN Conference on Trade and Development. They were the result of highly orchestrated efforts to bring enormous pressure on the world leaders at the Summit to adopt NGO demands. The next protest is scheduled for Washington D.C. against the World Bank-International Monetary Fund meetings starting on April 16.

The NGO demands take the form of Charter 99, A Charter for Global Democracy, which is nothing more than a restatement of recommendations made in 1995 by the UN Commission on Global Governance. Both provide a blueprint for global governance. The Commission on Global Governance had recommended a new UN Charter be presented to heads of state at the Millennium Summit on September 6. That recommendation was derailed, however. So, instead of the UN proposing a new UN Charter at the Millennium Assembly, NGOs will do it. In a stroke of Hegelian duplicity, NGOs are now protesting against the evils globalism to create global governance. By using rioting they hope to force the world’s leaders at next September’s Millennium Summit to create a new UN Charter which will institute global governance. The UN will claim the people of the world demanded it.

Six sub-themes will be addressed at the Millennium Forum that parallel Charter 99: 1) Peace, Security and Disarmament, 2) The Eradication of Poverty, Including Debt Cancellation and Social Development; 3) Human Rights; 4) Sustainable Development and The Environment; 5) The Challenges of Globalization, Achieving Equity Justice and Diversity; and, 6) Strengthening and Democratizing the United Nations and Other International Organizations. More accurate titles might be: 1) Global Gun Control and Disarmament, 2) Redistribution of Wealth, 3) Control of Human Rights, 4) The Great Global Land Grab, 5) Creating an NGO Parliament within the UN and, 6) Socialization of the Planet.

Nearly every agenda item in the Millennium Forum represents a consolidation of power in the hands of non-elected bureaucrats and NGOs. The impudence with which these demands are made shows that the obliteration of national sovereignty and personal freedom is the core goal of "Civil Society" which seeks to establish enormous power for itself within the coming global government.

The plan to implement global governance is so diabolical it can come only from one source---Satan (diabolos), the father of all lies. Unless God intervenes, humanity is on a collision course with disaster. If so, remember 1 John 4:4, "Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world." V ms and ks
By His End Time Watchmen
Special for our readers: Enter Here and apply for a FREE hi-speed Xerox Color Printer. For those who need quality, speed and volume. Tell them Heritage Works Trust referred you!
Friday, 19 April, 2002 Annan calls for Mid-East peacekeepers
President Bush praised the Israeli withdrawal
United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan has said a multinational peacekeeping force is needed in the Middle East. Mr Annan told the Security Council that a multinational force was essential because the Israelis and Palestinians have been driven so far apart.
Israel radio said that the army pullout from Jenin had been completed early on Friday.
Israel had pulled its forces out of Jenin town and part of the refugee camp on Thursday, leaving behind what a UN envoy called a "totally unacceptable" situation.
Early on Friday morning a Palestinian man was shot dead as Israeli tanks moved into the edges of Rafah refugee camp in the Gaza Strip, Palestinian officials said.
The Israeli military said it was conducting a "routine operation" in the area, when it came under fire.
"Our forces returned fire towards the armed Palestinians only," an Israeli military source was quoted as saying.
Palestinian sources also said that Israeli tanks entered Qalqilya in the West Bank, one of the town from which the army withdrew last week, amid sporadic gunfire.
The Israeli army refused to comment.
'On schedule'
US President George W Bush said on Thursday that he believed the Israeli withdrawal was going to schedule.
Click here to see town-by-town update Describing Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon as "a man of peace", Mr Bush said Mr Sharon had begun his promised withdrawal and it was being done "quickly".
Palestinian spokesman Saeb Erekat called Mr Bush's comments "a gift, a reward for Sharon's policy of state terrorism and war crimes".
Israeli officials say that by Saturday troops will have left most West Bank areas apart from Ramallah and Bethlehem.
Speaking in New York, Mr Annan said there was a need for a peacekeeping force large enough to take "decisive action" to end the deadly cycle of attacks.
The multinational force should be assembled by countries willing to supply troops and should have "a robust mandate," he said, adding later: "I expect the United States to play an important role."
However, a White House spokesman said only that the US would back civilian monitors.
Ari Fleischer said that President George W Bush "thinks the purpose of America's military is to fight and win wars".
'Horrific' Jenin
UN envoy Terje Roed-Larsen, who toured the Jenin refugee camp on Thursday, said that the devastation left by Israeli forces was "horrific beyond belief".
He said it was "morally repugnant" that Israel had not allowed emergency workers in for 11 days to provide humanitarian relief.
Palestinians claim hundreds of bodies are buried beneath the rubble, but Israel says the numbers of dead are far fewer.
An British independent forensic expert, Prof Derrick Pounder, says evidence suggests that a massacre has taken place.
Mr Roed-Larsen said the top priority was to bring in search-and-rescue teams. The only rescue efforts currently under way are residents digging though the ruins looking for survivors.
"It is totally destroyed, it looks like an earthquake has hit it," he said.
Israel invaded the Jenin camp on 3 April, saying it was a hotbed of Palestinian militancy and declaring it a closed military zone.
Danny Ayalon, the chief foreign policy adviser to Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, said that Israel shared the humanitarian concerns and was already allowing some aid teams to operate.
Israel says troops will continue to surround the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, where a group of armed Palestinians are among more than 200 people who have been holed up for more than two weeks.

God's plan in progress now, for those who have eyes to see and ears to hear. Not everyone will understand God's coded prophecy!
To help decode: The word "whore, false prophet, woman and Babylon the Great" refers to organized religion. The word "beast and Babylon" refers to organized governments. The word "horn" refers to divisions of the UN system or members. Now study with the language tools provided later on in this web site and you will know where we are on God's callender.
Revelation Chapter 18
Chapter 18 announces the judgment. The one difficulty here is verse 4, coming where it is; but, as every difficulty in scripture, it leads into further light. The destruction of Babylon is simple enough. She falls by God's judgment just before Christ comes to judge the earth; and, first perhaps losing her power and influence, is destroyed by the horns and beast. The comparison of chapter 16:8, and the place it holds, chap. 16:19, 18:8, and the beginning of 19, make this plain. Chapter 18 is a warning from heaven, not the angel of judgment of the earth. It is not consequent on events, but supposes spiritual apprehension of heaven's mind. This is the case when it is simply a voice from heaven. This call then was a spiritual call, not a manifest judgment. It may be more urgent and direct just before judgment, and I doubt not will be: as the call is in Hebrews to come out of the camp because Jerusalem's day was at hand. Hence I believe this applies whenever we see the system to be Babylon, and the sense of her iniquities is pressed upon the conscience.
The chapter then goes on to the actual execution of judgment according to chapter 17:16. The horns, or kingdoms connected with the beast, have destroyed her. The kings mourn over her; so do those that have sought profit and ease and commerce in the earth. The royal and commercial system is shattered to pieces by the upset of the system. What characterises her, that for which she is judged, is idolatry, corruption, worldliness, and persecution. She is judged and destroyed, and the prosperity of the worldly is smitten by her fall, and the hopes of the kings who had commerce with her. The blood of all saints was found in her, as in Jerusalem in her day. Persecution comes from religion connected with worldly advantage. But what a picture we have here of the world, the relations of the kings and of the saints to Babylon!

World Government Plans and Humanity on hold:
The fact or quality of being humane; kindness, mercy, sympathy, etc.
During this time of world globalization, the human race is even more interconnected with one another than ever before, through economic and mass communication mediums. It is obvious that we depend on one another in order to maintain a stable economy and we all feel the ripple effects of a failed economy equally all through out the world. This also holds true with regards to our humanity.
Mass communication today delivers to us first hand information for us to witness upfront human suffering that unfortunately still exists in the world today. It is unavoidable for us not to be witness. Though, unlike the world economy, we do have a choice to either assist those who are suffering or to shut them out completely from our conscience.
Our individual choice to help or ignore human suffering is completely up to us and we must take responsibility for our actions on behalf of all mankind. It should be our obligation. Let us not leave our human rights in the hands of soldiers who are trained to kill and to politicians who train us to accept and justify the killing of children. Take humanity off hold by affirming in solidarity that all human beings shall enjoy fundamental rights and freedoms without discrimination. Until then, humanity is on hold.

Prophecy:
See Revelation 12:7-10 "satan and his 7000 angels cast to earth. Revelation 9:3-11, satan's rule for 5 months, Revelation 11:3-10 The two physical witnesses of the end times and their death after 3 1/2 years. Then satans reign comes to an end at the battle of Hamongog and Armageddon. 1st Cor. 15:52 Our physical bodies are all changed to spirit bodies at Christ return!

The Final Great World War:
Armageddon at the Valley of Meggido in Israel and Hamongog is Alaska.

This website is written for and by both Christian, Jewish and Muslim editors.
Our goal is to present the real truth that is hidden to mankind and let the world know that only God will bring about total peace. Yes and it will be in the next few short years. He who endures all things and sufferings will be of survice in God's Kingdom for a Millennium.
See (1 Cor. 15:52) and you will know when!

THE HONEST TRUTH
Before You Read Any Further, Enter Here and learn how to 'discern truth written or spoken by a man' in our times!
Confirming Information Web Sites
(1) Lets follow Usama bin Laden all the way to the Coos County, Oregon Jail in September of 2008 - We know where he is all the time!
(2) The Eyes On The World - News & Prophecy
(3) World News Today - the most accurate!
(4) Daily Bible Study - Translated from original Greek, Chaldean & Hebrew Manuscripts
(5) Valuable Free Software Downloads and Services for our Readers
(6) Government Secrets, Secret Projects, Aliens, (ADULT CONTENT)
(7) War is on the Horizon in 2008 AD
(8) The Plot to surrender America to the UN
(9) Facts That Our Political and Religious Leaders don't want you to know!
(10) A great Sept. 11 Site of World-Wide News Stories

Native peoples of all nations, black, white, red, yellow, grey and those of the inner earth, we need your tithes and offerings to continue our work. If you know that I, Melchizedek, the son of man, am working hard day and night to reach every man, woman and child throughout the entire earth for the bettermint, understanding and to help give you peace in the end times of this system as we know it! Please help us help you.
At the end of each callender month, we will randomly pick a new batch of nine families in need and send them 10% of the months receivables before expences.
Those whom are blessed with more, please send a tithe of your annual earnings, for you too may be a receiver. Those of you that have less, send one to three gold one ounce coins of your country and those with little, send one silver one to three ounce coins. Old collectable coins are accepted too!
Three families in each group will receive 10% of the gross receipts in each catergory and each month there will be nine receivers of unimagined amounts. Better than any lottery and you will receive more from God! With no scams! START TODAY and RECEIVE INSTANT BLESSINGS TOMORROW! Spiritual, physican and financial. You cannot outgive the Lord!
Tell your relatives, friends and neighbors. Then in a nice little box with the coins, enclose that name of the individuals that have their dna on the coins along with you physical and financial needs. Rap them in a baggie. We will then take each and every box with the offering and say a special prayer for health, healing and safety for all that you mention. Some will be blesed financially, some physically and most important using the code of three "spiritually."
And I promiss that you all will have bread on your table as well as special blessing from the most high. We in the God family, three of us, love you all, just beleive and see miracles happen, including the dead being raised up in the flesh and miraculas healings in these end times. Miracles which doctors cannot do! Don't waite to be raptured, it is only a dotorine of man that began in Scotland in 1830. Look up the rapture docturing by Margeret MacDonald of Scotlnad on you computer and our web sites and you will know the truth and whole story to tell you religious leaders.
You will then become teachers of the word and bless many as we will bless you. You will be hated by many, but loved by more. Teach them how to have the same blessings which we give you!
Never have to buy drugs with side effects of liver failiur, heart attact and death ever again.
Please let us help you live a better life with understanding of not only the code of three, but a life that the Father meant you to have in the first place. As the Father and I have allways been with you, let us now prove it to you beyond a shawdow of doublt. Can any mortal man make such a promiss. Let you conscience be your guide after you read this and our many other wib sites. You will see they are all written to you in order to better your understanding and assist all mankind for the better. With a eternal love from the father Yehwey and I the son of man, Melchizedek!
We use God's code of three in all of our dealings. - By the great white spirit, the 3rd entity of The Father, Son and Holy Spirit or God's evenging Angel or the son of man is Here Now in the flesh! The code of 3 is very important for you to understand to know when your blessing are coming!.
Yes, I do look right into the sun and my eyes don't burn! For America to succeed, the nation must turn back to God. Remember, In God we trust! Not "M. Obama!" September 4, 2008
As evidenced below, prophecy in the book of Daniel and Revelations is about to be fullfilled. The king of the North, (Russia) is about to come against the king of the South (USA). The rest of the prophecied events you can read with confidence below after the psunami. If we have a giant psunami in January 2009, then we know that we are on God's callender of the prophecied end times, would'nt you say?
If you don't know us yet, read Revelations 11:4. We are the two olive trees and the two candlestiks, standing before the God of this earth. God's two end time witnesses. As a whirlwind commeth out of the north, there shall be the son of man.
For the coming atomic war we will try to have a good supply of Potassium Iodate on Hand for radiation poisoning and Atrophine for poison gas. Follow instrustions on the labels. Ask you National Guard or Doctor for a one month supply. Also have a bottle of grapefruit seed extract on hand to purify your drinking water. Have dried foods and vitamins & nutrients in you kit too! Then read on other web site for emergency supplies needed! We in the god family do not lie about prophecy and don't want to have to worry about all of you fine people in the world!
"In the begining" we gave man comon sence"
With emotions of Love and hate, we live with each day! With sences of sight, sound, smell, taste, touch. If it is hot, we don't touch, drink, eat or taste it until it cools off. If you apply comon sences in life, you won't get burnt! Dogs have the sence of smell to follow their masters, if he is good and feeds him! They have excellent smell, hearing, sight, and have memories and emotions. Dog is God spelt backwards. Do you have a sence of place and purpose? Is it to bring together or devide? "Love or hate?" What will be the end result? The earth too has electro magnitic waves! Can you read them? Are your idols truely worthy of your love and respect? Will they accomplish your hearts desires and needs? Appy all the above in your daily decission making! Remember, judgement began at the household of the Lord! Shepherds, religious leaders and political leaders, do you live for your people or your own personal ambitions? Let all nations, above, in and on the earth pray together for the "Eternal God's will" in these end times. Amen
To all mankind everywhere. Before you begin to read this web-site, take the time to remember the following two Bible Scriptures taken from the original KJV of 1611!
First - Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? From - (2 Cor. 6:14)
Second - When a man's ways please the LORD, he maketh even his enemies to be at peace with him. From - (Proverbs 16:7)
In the Old Testament Bible it states that in these end time Israel would be hated by all nations and the enemy will be knocking down their doors from house to house. Keep in mind that it is referring to all of the 13 tribes of Israel and not just Judah! To mention too that England is where the Tribe of Epherim settled with some of the Royal Tribe of Judah. (The Royal Family) via Scotland and Ireland. And the USA is where the Tribe of Mennaseh came and settled from England on the Mayflower.
So all Israel will be hated and surrounded by the enemy. Russia to our north via Alaska and Cuba to the South and China to our south, via the Panama Canal and the South seas. Europe will stand off and wait for Israel to be defeated and then come to collect the spoils like vultures.
But, then read (2 Chron. 20:29) And the fear of the GOD (Father) was on all the Kingdoms of those Countries when they had heard that the LORD fought against the enemies of Israel. Israel is God's chosen people in the end times to fulfill His final works! Are You An Enemy of Israel and GOD?
Can't you now see that we are in the last days as mentioned in Prophecy? Open your heart and eyes my friends, God has already taken His "blessings and protections" away from "America in 1992" because she went a hoaring and allowed the dog (homo-sexuals) See (Rev. 22:15) in the military camps and did not put them out! Also see Re. 21: and read all about the seven vials and seven plagues be poured out on man at this time. Both scripture and news below will confirm all!

Do You Know What Is Planed For Our World Tomorrow from 2001 to 2009?

Washington Won't Let Israel Win

Heritage Associates April, 2002: This is not a war on terror. It's a fight against America's enemies

First the 25 September 2001

Terrorism of the Worst Type

BILDERBERG’S AGENDA

You are cordially invited...