Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
The enemy within our USA borders 2008

Why Man's Self Rule Failed & Why Christ" Reign Will Succeed

No religion, government, educational system and financial system has evaded corruption by Satan, They are his four hidden dynasties that he has controlled mankind since the beginning of time. None coincide with God's ultimate purpose for all of mankind. Man suffers the sins of power, greed, lust, selfishness, selfcerterdness, jealousy, hate, envy and immorality.

Doctors now give you medicine that kills you and not heal you! Your food is toxic from chemicals and water is contaminated. Death is all around you, even same sex marriage is legal just as in the days of Sodom and Gomorrah. Effects, HIV, aids, ghonarea, syphilis, clap and death. Do you think God meant it to be this way? He sent His only begotten Son Jesus Christ to atone for our sins and he had a very pain full death. Did he waste his time?

Sometimes I wish that I never left the heavens to see all this. But I told the Father, I will do what ever it takes again.

Now! From this day on, our organization of christian soldiers and mercenaries and I will no longer aid and assist in any way to kill, destroy morally, mentally and physically as well as financially any of God's wonderful creation of man. Read "2nd Peter ch.3" about the three earth ages. You all did pass through the first earth age and now live in the second. In a few year it will be the third and final earth age for 1,000 years with Christ as king.

We will assist in good things such as aid and assistance to the needy and less fortunate. We still are humanitarians! Regardless of being rich, poor, woman, man, children, other races both in, on and above the earth, after a good evaluation of the problems, we will give our all to help in what ever way possible. Tell me, if your son or a hungry neighbor ask you for a loaf of bread, would you give him a stone? We won't!

If anyone hurts to our knowledge the least of my children and adults, they in like manor they will be dealt with, only 100 times more severe. So don't please. We all are well trained in many painful arts and killing!

Mankind has nearly destroyed all of the inhabited earth this time and Yahaveh, out of love for mankind said He would never let the earth be destroyed again, as in Noah's flood and the ice age. Eternal life has been offered to all, with a condition! Do it HIS way, not yours.

I am trying to lead you to good clean water and if you refuse to drink it, you will die! In a few years, after Satan reigns in Jerusalem as the Pope from the Catholic church, after they kill the present pope, as Antichrist. For five months he will reign. See Rev. Ch. 9 and the time of the locust.Then read in Revelation 13 where he will slay us two witnesses and for 31/2 days we will lay in the streets of Jerulelam, for all to see on national TV, then we will be raised up by the Father for all the world to see on national TV too. Then Michael the Arc Angel will imprison Satan for 1'000 years

We will then beat our weapons into plow shares and fix up the earth once again. We will have love, happiness, sex beyond your wildest dreams and all of your hearts desires if good, no more sickness or death for 1'000 years to start.

Then there must be one final great white thrown judgment to see if any follow Satan again. Those who do will be thrown with Satan into the lake of fire and burnt to ashes and as they never existed. What will be your choice after having had 1,000 years of perfection. A utopia type government from the top down?

So my friends,after studying our web sites, if we have helped you, please help us in reaching all of mankind in these peerless times, so all will have had the free choice that you do. Send us your tithes and offerings to "Melchezedek at 67624 Spinreel road lot #39, North Bend, Oregon 97459 USA" Send us your prayer request and tell us about your needs! Help us and I promiss that you will see almost immediate blessings in your life! May Yahavey be with you all, every day of your life! Amen

Know Who Your True Enemies Are

  • Who Are They? What Countries?

    America and Britain in Prophecy Today

    Modern evangelists and theologians, like Jack van Impe, do not know where the bible places America and Britain today in prophecy and what the bible says about their role in modern history.  World Wars I and II are assumed not to be mentioned in scripture.  Would God leave these two horrendous world wars out of bible prophecy?  Twentieth century America and Britain are assumed to be left out of the biblical account.  Wrong!  We just do not understood the key to where our western world is talked about in scripture.  Current events in Europe and America are very much in the bible.  What is missing is the key to the identity of these nations in prophecy.

    The answer is found in an overlooked term in Bible prophecy: the "ships of Chittim" , which describes a great naval power of Biblical times. A corrupt high priest and prophet, Balaam , gave us prophesiesfor the end time which clear up the mystery. Here is the origin of the term and the answer.

    In The Last Days

    (Jer 12:14 NKJV) Thus says the LORD: "Against all My evil neighbors who touch the inheritance which I have caused My people Israel to inherit; behold, I will pluck them out of their land and pluck out the house of Judah from among them.
    (Jer 12:16 NKJV) "And it shall be, if they will learn carefully the ways of My people, to swear by My name, 'As the LORD lives,' as they taught My people to swear by Baal, then they shall be established in the midst of My people.
    (Num 24:14 NKJV) "And now, indeed, I am going to my people. Come, I will advise you what this people will do to your people [Arab confederacy of Edom] in the latter days."

    National Problems Defined

    (Isa 2:6-8 NKJV) For You have forsaken Your people, the house of Jacob, Because they are filled with eastern ways ; They are soothsayerslike the Philistines, And they are pleased with the children of foreigners. {7} Their land is also full of silver and gold, And there is no end to their treasures; Their land is also full of horses, And there is no end to their chariots. {8} Their land is also full of idols; Theyworship the work of their own hands , That which their own fingers have made.


    Table of Terms in Balaam's Prophecies: 
    Jacob America and Britain 
    Asshur Germany, the leading nation against the peoples of Israel in the end time 
    Eber Western Europe.  Caucasians of similar genetic strain to Israelites, but competing against Israel for dominance on the world scene. 
    Edom Confederacy of Esau 
    Amalek The terrorist leaders, setting the pace for the confederacy of Esau in the last days. 
    Ships: from the coasts of 'Cyprus' [Heb.: Chittim = 'the west'] Israel's end-time naval power, based in America and Britain.  Historically based on the Island of Crete, during the time of King Solomon's Empire. 

     

    Balaam's Prophecies

    (Num 23:22-24 NKJV) God brings them out of Egypt; He has strength like a wild ox. {23} "For there is no sorcery against Jacob, Nor any divination against Israel. It now must be said of Jacob And of Israel, 'Oh, what God has done!' {24} Look, a people rises like a lioness, And lifts itself up like a lion; It shall not lie down until it devours the prey, And drinks the blood of the slain."

    (Num 24:23-24 NKJV) Then he took up his oracle and said: "Alas! Who shall live when God does this? {24} But ships shall come from the coasts of Cyprus [Chittim or the west], And they shall afflict Asshur and afflict Eber, And so shall Amalek [be afflicted], until he perishes."


    Our National Character

    (Isa 41:1 NKJV) "Keep silence before Me, O coastlands, And let the people renew their strength! Let them come near, then let them speak; Let us come near together for judgment."
    This prophecy for the "lost" tribes of Israel was meant for the British Isles, where national strength was built up. God wanted to see what His people could do on their own. His desire was to test them as to national character -- to see what they can do before He pours out His Spirit to them. Here is the result:

    America -- the Champion of Freedom and Lex Rex

    America, the only global super-power, has placed freedom and liberty from any kind of slavery, as a national goal for all mankind. American foreign policy is to democratize the world. This is a foretaste of what will take place at the return of Jesus Christ and His Millennial rule. America, at this point in history, polices the world, not the United Nations. Modern day Israelites are gaining experience in international rule and in educating and influencing national governments This is being accomplished at the level of the spirit in man. We are still in spiritual slavery.
    What will eventually come upon the world scene is pictured in this scripture: (Isa 61:1 NKJV) "The Spirit of the Lord GOD is upon Me, because the LORD has anointed Me to preach good tidings to the poor; He has sent Me to heal the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to those who are bound;"
    The American founding fathers took the words of Samuel Rutherford and his concept of Lex Rex and built it into the constitution of the United States of America. In America, the "law is king", the king is not the law.
    This characteristic of American society is a foretaste of the government to come in the Millennium. (Deu 4:8 NKJV) "And what great nation is there that has such statutes and righteous judgments as are in all this lawwhich I set before you this day?"

    Britain -- gives the world a common language and common law

    The character of the ancient Ephraimites is that they had a peculiar accent and refused to change their speech, even at the peril of their lives. The English (Ephraimites) have given the world the Queen's English to enable international communication and to universally propagate the Gospel to all nations.
    The idea of Common Law is British -- common to all men. The British Empire spread the influence of one law for all nations. The Magna Carta and the Cartarum Confirmatio are a product of the English stubbornness to force the king to allow the protection of the law to be common to all men. The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights , of December 10, 1948, is a corruptedcopy of British Common Law. The "inherent dignity" of man is the source of its authority. What it leaves out is a place for the omnipotence of God in that declaration. It is a humanist document, in all respects. British law is God centered. Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II, is still the Defender of the Faith -- the Christian faith that is!

    In God We Trust ?

    America sets the pace for modern Israel and typifies the character of the Ten Lost Tribes with the phrase coined: "in God we trust". America is known for its industriousness, and characteristically trusting in God. (During the two World Wars, the British Commonwealth also exuded a faithful trust in God.) America does things in a big way and Americans used to trust God in a big way. Now, humanism has entered the many of the facets of our society. Humanism is taking over. Humanism pervades the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights (1948) not trust in God. Humanism is the basis for globalismand one world government, supported by intellectuals and the exceedingly wealthy. Humanism is destroying the values and religion of America and the British Commonwealth, because it leaves God, His wisdom, and the Ten Commandments out of the picture.

    Sons of Isaac. Isaac and the Arabians. Isolationists. Being provoked. Apostle Paul: Israel provoked to jealousy.

    Britain: Ephraim the "silly dove." Making alliances for military strategy.

    Israelites, a nation of freemen. Their worst punishment is to be enslaved.


    Middle East Wars

    Britain and America's involvement.

    Exodus17:14-15 'Then the LORD said to Moses, "Write this for a memorial in the book and recount it in the hearing of Joshua, that I will utterly blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven." And Moses built an altar and called its name, The-LORD-Is-My-Banner; for he said, "Because the LORD has sworn: the LORD will have war with Amalek from generation to generation ."'

    (Num 24:20 NKJV) Then he looked on Amalek, and he took up his oracle and said: "Amalek was first among the nations, But shall be last until he perishes."


    Our Economy in Prophecy

    (James 5:3 NKJV) Your gold and silver are corroded, and their corrosion will be a witness against you and will eat your flesh like fire. You have heaped up treasure in the last days.

    (Ezek 7:19 NKJV) 'They will throw their silver into the streets, And their gold will be like refuse; Their silver and their gold will not be able to deliver them In the day of the wrath of the LORD; They will not satisfy their souls, Nor fill their stomachs, Because it became their stumbling block of iniquity.

    Wealth, inventions, industrial might. Pareto's law. Sea gates: merchant mariners.

    Housing

    The poor

    The oppressed

    The skilled man


    Leadership in the Last Days

    The Princes (our politicians)
    (Isa 3:4-5 NKJV) "I will give children to be their princes, And babes shall rule over them. {5} The people will be oppressed, Every one by another and every one by his neighbor; The child will be insolent toward the elder, And the base toward the honorable."

    The Priests ('men of the cloth': ministers and televangelists)
    (Ezek 13:2 NKJV) "Son of man, prophesy against the prophets of Israel who prophesy, and say to those who prophesy out of their own heart , 'Hear the word of the LORD!'"
    (Ezek 13:10 NKJV) "Because, indeed, because they have seduced My people , saying, 'Peace!' when there is no peace; and one builds a wall, and they plaster it with untempered mortar;"
    (Ezek 13:22 NKJV) "Because with lies you have made the heart of the righteous sad , whom I have not made sad; and you have strengthened the hands of the wicked, so that he does not turn from his wicked way to save his life."

    The women
    (Isa 3:12 NKJV) As for My people, ... And women rule over them . O My people! Those who lead you cause you to err, And destroy the way of your paths."

    The children
    (Isa 3:12 NKJV) "As for My people, children are their oppressors,"


    The Knowledge of being Israel

    Salvation is of the Jews...

    Amos 3:7 a warning to Israel needed

    National punishment according to what we have heard from the servants of God.


    The Traitor King

    Documentary on the Second World War and the actions of the abdicated English king. A pattern for the future?


    Is America the Modern Babylon of Revelation 17?

    Discussion.


    Our Enemies: The common understanding among televangelists today is that Russia will attack America, as the biblical hordes of Gog and Magog. The bible speaks of Assyria as the enemy of the end-time Israelites. Which is correct?

    Kermins
    Germanii
    Prusians



    Is There is A GREAT Falling Away ?

    II Thessaloneans 2:

    The conspiracy.

    The battle of the Titans: Shem versus Nimrod

    The modern battle between Shem's descendants and the Beast's army of Revelation. Michael the archangel to stand against that arch demon, Satan the devil, and the ememies of America and Britain, in the Last Days.

    THE POPULAR VIEW

     Most people who read Paul's second letter to the Church at Thessalonica, fear many true believers will a fall away from the truth, in great numbers. It is commonly thought that a "man of sin" will appear on the world scene, and seduce many of God's people away from true worship. This scenario is an "end-time" dilemma where MANY of the ELECT are deceived and "lost" into damnation. The FEW, with great effort, escape this great deception. This scripture is NOT written ABOUT the church but TO the church.

    A PROPHECY TO THE CHURCH ?

     This prophecy is NOT about a "falling away".  It is about a great REBELLION or "apostasy" involving military invasion and war.  This scripture is a geo-political statement.  There are, however, religious implications. The questions are: Who is the "rebellion" against?  Which nations are involved?  What is the outcome?

     The answers involve a basic knowledge of history and Bible prophecy. You will be surprised at some of the answers.

      HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

    The battle between Shem and Nimrod -- a fore runner of the last great epoch between the people of God and those lead by an evil international conspiracy and Satan the Devil.

      THE SCRIPTURE IN CONTEXT

     "Let no man deceive you by any means; for (that Day will not come) unless the falling away comes first..." II Thessalonians 2:3

     Isn't it amazing when we focus only on a small part of the passage, the result can be off track. Don't be amazed! It happens often, when reading the Bible. The truth is, the passage is not referring to a falling away, but a warning of a Gentile apostasy, both political and religious in nature, to take hold of the world scene.

     Look again as the same scripture in context: "Now, brethren, concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our gathering together to Him , we ask you, not to be soon shaken in mind or troubled, either by spirit or by word or by letter, as if from us, as though the day of Christ had come."

     Note: There were two problems here. One, false apostles were attempting to communicate with and infiltrate the Church. Two, these impostors were saying Christ, and the millennium had come to the earth already ("in our hearts"?).

     Continuing: "Let no one deceive you by any means; for (that day will not come) unless the falling away comes first, AND the MAN OF SIN is REVEALED, the son of perdition, who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshipped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God.

     Look at the context. This verse (written TO the Church, NOT about it) refers to the same events which are mentioned in the book of Daniel. Lets look: "...he shall exalt and magnify himself above every god, shall speak blasphemies against the God of gods..." (Daniel 11:36). Paul writes about the same "man of sin" who is written of in the book of Daniel, chapters 7 and 11. (Go to your Bible and read these chapters yourself). Paul is NOT referring to the church but to the events surrounding the man of sin, and the political and religious forces which WILL affect the world at the END TIME.

      THE FALLING AWAY

     Lets look at the term: "the falling away".


    The Plagues, Trumpets, and Thunders of

The Book of Revelation

There are similarities between the plagues, trumpets and thunders of the book of Revelation. This chart demonstrates how these are similar. (Please note this is a simplistic overview to demonstrate this in principle, and a follow-up article is needed to clarify and explain the points.) This similarity does notchange the order of events as we understand them. It does emphasizethe role of the two witnessesand indicates the possibility of the return of the ark of the covenant to a temple in Jerusalem, just prior to the Great Tribulation and the Day of the Lord.


Comparison chart :

SEVEN TRUMPETSSEVEN LAST PLAGUESSEVEN THUNDERS
first trumpet sounds

vegetation struck

first bowl of judgment

malignant sores

first message proclaimed by the two witnesses

power over plagues

power over earth

second trumpet sounds

seas struck

second bowl of judgment

sea becomes blood

second message proclaimed by the two witnesses

power over waters to turn to blood

third trumpet sounds

waters struck

third bowl of judgment

waters become blood

third message proclaimed by the two witnesses

power over waters to turn to blood

fourth trumpet sounds

heavens struck

fourth bowl of judgment

sun's heat

fourth message proclaimed by the two witnesses

power over heaven

fifth trumpet sounds

armies: hurt; not killed; seek death

first woe (plague)

fifth bowl of judgment

darkness and pain

fifth message proclaimed by the two witnesses
sixth trumpet sounds

armies; Euphrates

second woe (plague)

sixth bowl of judgment

armies; Euphrates dries up

sixth message proclaimed by the two witnesses

power over waters

seventh trumpet sounds earthquake

third woe (plague)

kingdoms subdued

temple opened (Revelation 11:19)

the ark of the covenant seen in heaven

lighnings; noises; thunderings

seventh bowl of judgment

earthquake

"it is done" (Revelation 16:17)

noises; thunderings; lightnings

seventh message proclaimed by the two witnesses

two witnesses killed

two witnesses resurrected after 3 1/2 days

"mystery of God...finished" (Revelation 10:7)

the ark of the covenant in Jerusalem seen again ?

Is God warning our nations?...Ephrim and Manassah (England and America)

Why and How God Judges the Nations The blessing of God on a nation is a balance between the fulfillment of His promises and the submission to Him of its citizens.

When we forsake God's revealed path to prosperity, His Law, then in order to return the nation to right paths He "removes the hedge" of protection (Isaiah 5).

The recent collapse of many economies, the spread of incurable disease in man and animal, destructive natural calamities (e.g., El Nino, earthquakes, floods), global warming, loss of sovereignty, civil wars, criminality, military attack, failure of crops - all are the result of our disobedience to the divinely revealed laws for health, peace and prosperity.

All reflect the judgment of God upon the nations.

There's an unbreakable link between human behavior and the natural world. Obedience to the laws of God ("righteousness") brings prosperity to a nation. Disobedience ("sin") wreaks havoc and brings reproach - and ultimately the end of once great nations.

Especially, these judgments are sent upon those nations which have benefited from the blessings God conferred on Abraham and upon the descendants of Israel. The Anglo-Saxon nations, of all peoples, have participated in these blessings (Deuteronomy 33:13-17).

For over two hundred years we have been in positions of world influence, and increasing national prosperity. While far from perfect and often misused, colonial rule increased wealth and brought stability to those nations - conditions which existed neither before nor since. The homelands we have inherited have yielded untold riches and living standards beyond compare.

Yet we have forsaken the Giver - the one who gives us the power to get wealth (Deut 8:17-20).

As long as there was respect for the God of the Christian Bible, while He was proclaimed as "our God", to the extent we based our laws on His Word - then we were hedged around. God gave us many famous victories over our enemies. Men of wisdom and renown flourished in every aspect of society.

Now, we are increasingly in servitude to foreign domination. Strangers write - and impose - our laws. The British Parliament is the lap-dog of undemocratic and unelected officials beyond our shores. Waving the banner of liberality and equality, laws that degrade and undermine society are imposed behind closed doors.

And God will judge us.

He will judge our nation for our neglect of the elderly and for disrespect towards parents. We will be judged for our soft legislation on crime, for our rampant sexual immorality, for the legalization of perverse practice, for legal laxity and injustice. And for our rampant consumerism - nothing more than greed and idolatry.

Above all, we will be judged for despising the Creator and His revealed religion. Our national decline has coincided with - and been caused by - our progressive rejection of The Word of God.

We have been given time to change. Our leaders have for years been warned by many Christian activists of the awesome consequences of our godless materialism.

There may not be much time left.

Sincerely, Heritage Works Trust

200 Lakeland Drive

Lakeside, Oregon 97449 USA

  • What Is Their Purpose? What Weapons Will They Use?
  • When Will They Attack And How? Where Will They Attack?

    April 24, 2002 - Before you "kill" an "American", know what an American is!

    "You probably missed it in the rush of news last week, but there was actually a report that someone in Pakistan had published in a newspaper an offer of a reward to anyone who killed an American, any American. So I just thought I would write to let them know what an American is, so they would know when they found one.

    An American is English, or French, or Italian, Irish, German, Spanish, Polish, Russian or Greek. An American may also be Mexican, African, Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Australian, Iranian, Asian, or Arab, or Pakistani, or Afghan. An American may also be a Cherokee, Osage, Blackfoot, Navaho, Apache, or one of the many other tribes known as native Americans.

    An American is Christian, or he could be Jewish, or Buddhist, or Muslim. In fact, there are more Muslims in America than in Afghanistan. The only difference is that in America they are free to worship as each of them chooses. An American is also free to believe in no religion. For that he will answer only to God, not to the government, or to armed thugs claiming to speak for the government and for God.

    An American is from the most prosperous land in the history of the world. The root of that prosperity can be found in the Declaration of Independence, which recognizes the God given right of each man and woman to the pursuit of happiness.

    An American is generous. Americans have helped out just about every other nation in the world in their time of need. When Afghanistan was overrun by the Soviet army 20 years ago, Americans came with arms and supplies to enable the people to win back their country. As of the morning of September 11, Americans had given more than any other nation to the poor in Afghanistan.

    Americans welcome the best, the best products, the best books, the best music, the best food, the best athletes. But they also welcome the least. The national symbol of America, The Statue of Liberty, welcomes your tired and your poor, the wretched refuse of your teeming shores, the homeless, tempest tossed. These in fact are the people who built America. Some of them were working in the Twin Towers the morning of September 11, earning a better life for their families. [I've been told that the World Trade Center victims were from at least 30 other countries, cultures, and first languages, including those that aided and abetted the terrorists.

    So you can try to kill an American if you must. Hitler did. So did General Tojo, and Stalin, and Mao Tse-Tung, and every bloodthirsty tyrant in the history of the world. But, in doing so you would just be killing yourself. Because Americans are not a particular people from a particular place. They are the embodiment of the human spirit of freedom. Everyone who holds to that spirit, everywhere, is an American.

    So look around you. You may find more Americans in your land than you thought were there. One day they will rise up and overthrow the old, ignorant, tired tyrants that trouble too many lands. Then those lands, too, will join the community of free and prosperous nations, And America will welcome them!"

    Pass this around the World!

    April 22, 2002 - An Email from a Good Moslem patriot

    Thank you for your email, and I'm sorry for your position, Islam was never and will never become a religion of evil, nor is or will become an enemy of America or the American people we will stay a friend, Islam means Peace and Submission to God to be a true Moslem you have to submit and admit to all profits specially Moses, Jesus, and Mohamed if you do not believe or disregard any one of them you can not be a Moslem, Islam respect and love (Christian and Jews..they are called the people of the Holy Book _The Torah and the Bible-) that does not mean that all Jews, Christian, and Moslems are true believers and good people some of them are bad and evil and use religion to build a divide between people of deferent religions and cultures(like the people you are working for) our message should a one for understanding, love, and discussion. May God Bless all of us

    Enter Here and ID The Most Wanted Terrorists as of April 20, 2002 AD Some are in North America and with big bounties on them. But they are extremely dangerous!

    April 17, 2002

    Something sounds and smells rotten in the news regarding Osama bin Laden!

    Reported to us from al-Qaeda, B.C. Canada

    It was reported to us this morning by a very reliable and proven source that the statements made by Oliver North saying that his intelligence claims that Osama is dead! The same intelligence that told us for six months that they had Osama cornered and it was a matter of days before they would have him. The same intelligence that bombed the dickens out of Northern Afghanistan where they claimed Bin Laden was in the month of December. Funny, in mid-December one of our Canadian operatives interviewed Osama in Bagdad. Then followed him to the Sudan. Who were they really bombing at a cost of more than a million dollars an hour.

    Our Al-Qaeda source stated that Osama already has his own man in place in Palestine to take Arafat's place. Arafat will have choice of retiring out of country peacefully, or assassination. And it will be made to look like a CIA and Mossad operation. Maybe they are in on it too, he said. His Washington, D.C. connection seemed to know about the plan before himself! Why don't the so called intelligence community know these facts? Could they all be in on it together. Even Arafat knows he and Sadam are on Bin Laden's hit list since last year.

    Lets see how this one plays out. Remember, we have been telling you the facts for two years well in advance. With 99.9% accuracy. that should tell you something about our team and their sources, hey?

    The US political negotiating game.

    Even before Colin Powell's nine-day trip to the Middle East ends, it already looks doomed to failure ­ underlining how hard it is proving to halt the violence that has gone on since the time of Abraham, let alone restart a genuine process towards a political settlement.

    Yesterday the US Secretary of State met the Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, again for an hour before a scheduled final session with Yasser Arafat today at the Palestinian leader's compound in Ramallah. This offers a last realistic chance, however slim, of concrete results before General Powell heads for Egypt and then home.

    The one idea to emerge from his trip is for a ministerial-level meeting of Israel, the Palestinians, the US and Arab countries that would somehow link progress on the ground with new political moves. But even this is palliative at best. And would mean years of non-productive meetings and summits.

    In a hint of a concession, Mr Sharon told Israeli television it was a "secondary issue" who represented the Palestinians. This may mean that Mr Sharon will drop his refusal to have any further truck with Mr Arafat ­ a refusal that would doom in advance any serious initiative while both men are in power.

    But US officials were pessimistic about any breakthrough. Ari Fleischer, the White House spokesman, yesterday scaled back the goal of the Powell mission to one of merely "lessening the violence". With Israel's military operations continuing with blood and revenge in their hearts and no sign of a Palestinian call for a ceasefire, it is doubtful whether even that has been attained.

    "There are additional meetings, additional contacts and we'll let that develop," was all Mr Fleischer would say. "The talks haven't broken down, but it doesn't look good either," another US official said.

    Neither side has committed itself to the goals sought by the Bush administration. Mr Sharon has promised no more than a partial pullout over the next week, and yesterday Israeli tanks moved into new parts of east Jerusalem.

    For their part, the Palestinians say they won't issue any ceasefire statement until Israel ends its 18-day occupation of Palestinian towns and villages in the West Bank. "If Secretary Powell leaves the region while the Israeli occupation is still continuing, that would be a severe dilemma," Saeb Erekat, a senior negotiator for Mr Arafat, said yesterday. Knowing well the Arafat's time is short!

    But the White House has decided not to risk even more US credibility with an open-ended stay by General Powell without guaranteed results. Even before he left Washington on 7 April, General Powell warned he might return without a ceasefire in place. He was correct!

    Yesterday, the Secretary of State did claim to be making progress, but the elusive nature of the quest was evident in his next, rather baffling words: "The specific term 'ceasefire' has not quite the same significance as what actually happens, as opposed to a specific term."

    General Powell is said to be proposing a summit in the US in June. "We are with any serious and realistic international conference, but not a conference to exchange smiles," said a former Palestinian negotiator, Mohammed Dahlan, who is now the Gaza security chief. (Does he belong to Osama's team?) "We don't want a conference to cancel 10 years of negotiations but a conference to achieve a solution based on two states: Palestine and Israel."

    In the past such contacts, as at the 1991 Madrid conference convened by President Bush's father, have been at summit level. A repeat is impossible because of Mr Sharon's refusal to meet Mr Arafat. But the barring of the latter would be unacceptable to the Palestinians.

    The Bush administration has learnt one thing: like it or not, it is involved in the Middle East for the long haul. You might say until the enemy has us surrounded too! The White House confirmed last night that Mr Bush will meet Crown Prince Abdullah of Saudi Arabia at his Texas ranch next week. Top of the agenda will be the Saudi plan for Arab recognition of Israel in return for a full Israeli withdrawal from the territories occupied since 1967. But we already know that Bin Laden's team has other plans.

    "We are with any serious and realistic international conference, but not a conference to exchange smiles," said a former Palestinian negotiator, Mohammed Dahlan, who is now the Gaza security chief. Does bin Laden own his soul?) "We don't want a conference to cancel 10 years of negotiations, but a conference to achieve a solution based on two states which has never happened in the past and has no chance of happening today either!: Palestine and Israel, arch enemies since the time of Abraham, Isac and Jacob and until Satan the antichrist returns to make the false peace!."

    In the past such contacts, as at the 1991 Madrid conference convened by President Bush's father, have been at summit level. A repeat is impossible because of Mr Sharon's refusal to meet Mr Arafat as God has put in his heart. But the barring of the latter would be unacceptable to the Palestinians so as to not loose face yet.

    The Bush administration has learnt one thing: that like it or not, it is involved in the Middle East for the long haul until the enemy no longer allows us. The White House confirmed last night that Mr Bush will meet Crown Prince Abdullah of Saudi Arabia at his Texas ranch next week. Top of the agenda will supposidly be the Saudi plan for Arab recognition of Israel in return for a full Israeli withdrawal from the occupied territories.

    Who will have the final word, God or Man? Who do you believe?

    By His End Time Watchmen

    Web Sites With Knowledge Of Yesterday And Tomorrow

    War and Usama bin Laden's Reign of Terror

    His End Time Watchmen watching Bin Laden yesterday

    Communism - Not Islam-The Mafia's other Partners

    War is on the Horizon in 2002 AD

    Today's Modern Terrorism - Who is really behind it?

    Russian Intelligence Warns CIA: Next Target In US will be?

    Increase Your Business of Product Income Ten-Fold

    The Origin of the Koran

    Profiles of Terrorist Organizations - many have cells in the USA

    Osama bin Laden's Hit List for 2002 AD

    The Facts on this web site and related links may shock the world!

    ENTER HERE for April 1, 2002 Exciting factual updates on War and Bin Laden

    Heritage Associates April, 2002: This is not a war on terror. It's a fight against America's enemies

    First the 25 September 2008

    'We are being asked to support a war whose aims appear to be as misleading as they are secretive'

    While covering the Russian occupation of Afghanistan existed, I would, from time to time, drive down through Jalalabad and cross the Pakistan border to Peshawar to rest. In the cavernous, stained interior of the old Intercontinental Hotel, I would punch out my stories on a groaning telex machine beside an office bearing the legend "Chief Accountant" on the door. On the wall next to that office – I don't know if it was the Chief Accountant who put it there – was a framed piece of paper bearing four lines of Kipling that I still remember:

    A scrimmage at a border station

    A canter down a dark defile

    Five thousand pounds of education

    Felled by a five-rupee jezail

    Or, I suppose today, a Kalashnikov AK-47, home-produced in Quetta, or one of those slick little Blowpipe missiles that we handed over to the mujahedin with such abandon in the early Eighties so that they could kill their – and our – Russian enemies.

    But I've been thinking more about the defiles, the gorges and overhanging mountains, the sheer rock walls 4,000 feet in height, the caves and the massive tunnels which Osama bin Laden cut through the mountains. Here, presumably, are the "holes" from which the Wes is going to "smoke out" Mr bin Laden, always supposing that he's been obliging enough to run away and hide in them. For there is already a growing belief – founded on our own rhetoric – that Mr bin Laden and his men are on the run, seeking their hiding places.

    I'm not so certain. I'm very doubtful about what Mr bin Laden is doing right now. In fact, I'm not at all sure what we – the West – are doing. True, our destroyers and aircraft carriers and fighter aircraft and heavy bombers and troops are massing in the general region of the Gulf. Our SAS boys – so they say in the Middle East – are already climbing around northern Afghanistan, in the region still controlled by the late Shah Masoud's forces. But what exactly are we planning to do? Kidnap Mr bin Laden? Storm his camps and kill the lot of them, Mr bin Laden and all his Algerian, Egyptian, Jordanian, Syrian and Gulf Arabs?

    Or is Mr bin Laden merely chapter one of our new Middle Eastern adventure, to be broadened later to include Iraq, the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, the destruction of the Lebanese Hezbollah, the humbling of Syria, the humiliation of Iran, the reimposition of yet another fraudulent "peace process" between Israel and the Palestinians?

    If this seems fanciful, you should listen to what's coming out of Washington and Tel Aviv. While The New York Times Pentagon sources are suggesting that Saddam may be chapter two, the Israelis are trying to set up Lebanon – the "centre of international terror" according to Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon – for a bombing run or two, along with Yasser Arafat's little garbage tip down in Gaza where the Israelis have discovered, mirabile dictu, a "bin Laden cell".

    The Arabs, of course, would also like an end to world terror. But they would like to include a few other names on the list. Palestinians would like to see Mr Sharon picked up for the Sabra and Chatila massacre, a terrorist slaughter carried out by Israel's Lebanese allies – who were trained by the Israeli army – in 1982. At 1,800 dead, that's only a quarter of the number killed on 11 September. Syrians in Hama would like to put Rifaat Al-Assad, the brother of the late president, on their list of terrorists for the mass killings perpetrated by his Defence Brigades in the city of Hama in the same year. At 20,000, that's more than double the 11 September death toll.

    The Lebanese would like trials for the Israeli officers who planned the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982, which killed 17,500 people, most of them civilians – again, well over twice the 11 September statistic. Christian Sudanese would like President Omar al-Bashir arraigned for mass murder.

    But, as the Americans have made clear, it's their own terrorist enemies they are after, not their terrorist friends or those terrorists who have been slaughtering populations outside American "spheres of interest". Even those terrorists who live comfortably in the US but have not harmed America are safe: take, for example, the pro-Israeli militiaman who murdered two Irish UN soldiers in southern Lebanon in 1980 and who now live in Detroit after flying safely out of Tel Aviv. The Irish have the name and address, if the FBI are interested – but of course they're not.

    So we are not really being asked to fight "world terror". We are being asked to fight America's enemies. If that means bagging the murderers behind the atrocities in New York and Washington, few would object. But it does raise the question of why those thousands of innocents are more important – more worthy of our effort and perhaps blood – than all the other thousands of innocents. And it also raises a much more disturbing question: whether or not the crime against humanity committed in the US on 11 September is to be met with justice – or a brutal military assault intended to extend American political power in the Middle East.

    Either way, we are being asked to support a war whose aims appear to be as misleading as they are secretive. We are told by the Americans that this war will be different to all others. But one of the differences appears to be that we don't know who we are going to fight and how long we are going to fight for. Certainly, no new political initiative, no real political engagement in the Middle East, no neutral justice is likely to attend this open-ended conflict. The despair and humiliation and suffering of the Middle East peoples do not figure in our war aims – only American and European despair and humiliation and suffering.

    As for Mr bin Laden, no one believes the Taliban are genuinely ignorant of his whereabouts. He is in the Coos County Jail in Coquille, Oregon for several weeks now and getting dialisis treatments. But has he really gone to ground here? During the Russian war, he would emerge, again and again, to fight Afghanistan's Russian occupiers, to attack the world's second superpower. Wounded six times, he was a master of the tactical ambush, as the Russians found out to their cost. Evil and wicked do not come close to describing the mass slaughter in the US. But – if it was Mr bin Laden's work – that does not mean he would not fight again. And he would be fighting on home ground. There are plenty of dark defiles into which we may advance. And plenty of cheap rifles to shoot at us. And that wouldn't be a "new kind of war" at all.

    Truth, as Winston Churchill notoriously said, must be protected by "a bodyguard of lies". But Churchill, who once described pre-1948 Palestine as a "hell-disaster", could never have known the deception, dishonesty and sheer fantasy of today's propaganda in the Middle East. Is the conflict here a "war against terror" or a struggle against Zionism?

    Anyone who does not know the cost of trying to answer that question has only to refer to a document recently published by the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which asks the question: "Is anti-Zionism different from anti-Semitism?"

    Here's part of the answer: "Just as anti-Semitism denies Jews their rights as individuals in society, anti-Zionism attacks the Jewish people as a nation ... It is no coincidence that the recent censure of Israel in international forums and the media has been accompanied by a sharp increase in anti-Semitic incidents." The message is simple: to criticise Israel risks the charge of racism; better, therefore, to keep to the safe line that Israel is fighting a "war against terror" rather than reoccupying the land of a subject people.

    As usual, the Israelis are initially winning the propaganda war. The evil campaign of Palestinian suicide bombers and the eloquence of at least some of Israel's spokesmen easily crush the efforts of a colonised and occupied people whose corrupt leader, Yasser Arafat, appoints his own cronies as press officers, men who are often uneducated and incomprehensible in English.

    Marwan Kanafani, Mr Arafat's man in Gaza, speaks good English but comes across as a used-car salesman. His man at the UN rants and raves like a Nasserite. Mustafa Barghouti – who may or may not be on Israel's latest "wanted list" – announced yesterday that the Israeli reoccupation of Palestinian cities was "the worst crime of the 21st century". Ruthless and brutal the Israeli invasions have been, but at least one event in the United States in the autumn of last year suggests his remarks are ridiculous.

    The Israelis produce spokesmen who seem calculated to appeal to an American audience. Ranaan Gissin and Dore Gold come across as tough, uncompromising figures in the US. In Europe, however, they look respectively like a New York taxi driver and an undertaker. Mr Gissin's performance on the BBC earlier this year – trying to reassure the world that Ariel Sharon had "paid the price" for being personally responsible for the 1982 Sabra and Chatila massacre – was positively creepy.

    Far better was the public performance of Uri Dromi, Yitzhak Rabin's former spokesman and a one-time Israeli Air Force C-130 pilot, who used to come across as a thoughtful, intelligent and sometimes troubled man who believed in the State of Israel but acknowledged its flaws.

    The "nice-cop/bad-cop" routine of Mr Sharon and Shimon Peres also serves its purpose in the outside world. If Mr Sharon appears suspect – not least because of his ghastly role in Sabra and Chatila – the Labour Party's Mr Peres, holder (with Arafat, let us quickly forget) of the Nobel Peace Prize, gives the present very extreme Israel government a humane face.

    Mr Peres appears to present the friendly, humanistic, honourable Israeli government which the world wants to believe in. Journalists who ask Mr Peres soft questions – which means just about all of them – have to forget that it was he who launched Israel's "Grapes of Wrath" operation, which led to the 1996 massacre of 108 Lebanese civilians at a UN camp in Qana.

    The government in which Mr Peres serves is, after all, the same government that is building illegal colonies on Arab land for Jews, and Jews only, at a greater speed than ever; destroying the physical symbols of the Oslo agreement; and re-occupying the West Bank. If Mr Peres was opposed to these ruthless policies, he could leave the Sharon government. But he chooses not to do so.

    In the present conflict, the Israeli Army's use of the "closed military area", which bans journalists from any district where Israeli soldiers are misbehaving or killing the innocent, has dissuaded many reporters from entering the newly-occupied Palestinian cities.

    Thus Israel can boast of its army's highly professional and moral soldiering, supposedly risking the lives of its men to protect the innocent, while castigating journalists who do break the military rules for their eyewitness reporting of the lack of discipline of Israeli troops and their reckless killings. Rotting bodies in the streets of Bethlehem and Ramallah are portrayed as Palestinian propaganda – providing few journalists see the bodies with their own eyes.

    Thus the false news of a Catholic priest killed in Bethlehem on Tuesday was condemned by an Israeli spokesman as a Palestinian lie – even though the inaccurate story was originally put out by a Catholic church agency and then broadcast on Israeli as well as Palestinian radio.

    In his latest bunker-prison, Yasser Arafat rages against journalists who ask about suicide bombers – as if it is somehow indecent to mention the massacre of Israelis and the role of the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, a satellite of Mr Arafat's own Fatah movement.

    Far more culpable is the Israeli press, usually so courageous in denouncing Israel's role in atrocities, but which has largely left its readers ignorant of Palestinian suffering. In Tuesday's edition of Ha'aretz, Aviv Lavie remarked that Israeli journalists "cease collecting facts and asking questions, and instead turn to beating the war drums – yesterday, Ma'ariv's editor, Amnon Danker, ran a front-page article devoted to smashing, killing, trampling and destroying – it's time to say goodbye, at least in the meanwhile, to a free press".

    On the same day, The Jerusalem Post ran a haunting full page of passport-sized snapshots of the more than 60 Israeli men, women and children killed by Palestinian suicide bombers over the previous month. It was a page of memory and pain. But the paper has no plans to run a similar page of photographs of the innocent Palestinians who have been killed by Israel's supposedly "elite" army.

    Somany Great Income Opportunities that we use ourself!

    > Who and Where Osama bin Laden Is!

    Our Enemies Plan To Totally Destroy Us

    -------
    Tribe of Judah----Tribe of Menassah

    The Lion and the house of Judah

    Christianity and the House of Israel

    Do the "citizens" of Israel and the USA really know who our enemies are and how soon they plan to overtake our two Nation?

    Ethiopia

    Many terrorist leaders under the guidance, training, financial, and weapons aid from China and Russia have been organizing and planing for the grand takeover of America. Yes right under our nose and of the UN. Not only the USA is at risk, but Israel is their first target. Our source from Sicily has recently disclosed over 140 terrorist cells being active in Ethiopia alone.Silently making their preparations. They have received excellent training from Cuba as well. It appears that our partners against terrorism are really planning our demise. At the same time they sit down at our conference tables and discuss peace with our very vulnerable leaders, their agents are training and supplying our enemy with the very weapons that will be used against us.

    Enter Here and learn some of the history of Socialist Ethiopia. (The official name) Their background will explain their present position agaist Israel and the USA.

    Next we have The Sudan; a radical Islamic country know for haboring terrorist and entertaining many training camps for them. Our man bin Laden is visiting them at this time or will shortly do so. China, Russia and Iran have been very good to them for years. And the excellent training they received from the Cubans, puts them in very good shape when the finally go against Israel. Israel will be attacked both from the South and the North just as the USA will be. From the North to Israel will be Iran, Iraq, Libya, Russia, China and many other Arab States. From the South, along with Ethiopia and the Sudan, you will see many other African States as well.

    We have to remember too, Spain that has been one heck of a big financial backer of the Islamic and other terrorist groups around the world, will surely be there to grab the spoils.

    You will find Columbia and Mexico in the forefront heading even for Canada. Russia from the North and China and its Southern allies from the South will hit the USA. It does look like all the teams are nearly in place for the final play, doesn't it? China with it's hidden missles in Panama and Cuba. And the New Grand ports in the Bahamas owned and controlled by Hong Kong companies that are in tight with the Chinese Government and military.

    If someone had taken the time to watch, they would have seen that most of the financing that is now buried to deep to trace, came from Red China. The company, we are told, is just an other arm of the Chinese military.

    Well, our source of information from Sicily has given us a lot more to research before we enter it onto our web sites. So keep coming back and check all the sites for updates. More often than ever now! Things are moving real fast and you do want to keep up on it all now! Your life depends on it in these times. And we did promiss to help keep you all alive; that is those who really want to live!

    Over the next few weeks we will give our readers a count on the active terrorist cells in each country. Thus far we have a count of over 350 cells in the USA and Canada. That is most likely to be much higher in the final count.

    Encrypting Terror

    Terrorist groups continue using online photos and chatroom comments to play and execute terrorism campaigns. All terrorist groups are using the Internet to spread their messages.

    Muslim extremists copped on to the techniques about the same time that Digimarc began encrypting file identifiers with Photoshop in mid-1997.

    The groups increased their encrypted activities after US law enforcement authorities revealed they were tapping Osama bin Laden's satellite telephone calls from his Afghan base.

    In one method, bin Laden's operatives change the dots in a picture, replacing their hexadecimal value with encrypted code fragments.

    Each web page image, whether a picture or a map, is created by a series of dots. Inside the dots are strings of numbers and letters that computers read to create the image. Terrorists can hide coded messages in those letters and numbers.

    They're hidden using free encryption programs. The programs scramble the messages or pictures into existing images. The images can only be unlocked using a private key.

    The encoded photographs look just like an untouched photo. Even if you did suspect a dodgy photo, you would need the decryption program to read the actual message.

    Based on these developments, the Internet has become the modern version of the "dead drop" and it's very similar to the situation where spies left maps, pictures and other information.

    You could have a master plan for the Lockerbie bomb as your screensaver, yet never know it.

    Web version of a press release issued on 16th November 2001 by SGR

    "Notice how accurately this reporter describes one of Englands major weaknesses and how vulnerable to terrorist attack they are and the detailed damage that would take place. Why are they offering so much vital and dangerous information to the public or terrorist who also can read? There are no secrets, are there? That is why the terrorist will probably have their way."

    With the admission that "All plutonium can be used directly in nuclear explosives"[1,2] and the possibility of a plane crash on Sellafield creating a 200 to 700 kilometre exclusion zone[3] for a century (making large parts of Britain uninhabitable) with unimaginable human suffering, environmental damage and economic costs[4], Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR [5]) calls for an urgent and comprehensive review of the risks of continuing to operate the Sellafield nuclear facilities.

    Nuclear power is often portrayed as the clean alternative to fossil fuels with no mention of the potential cost of damage of nuclear fuels and waste.

    Whilst the threat of terrorists making a nuclear bomb from stolen plutonium is of great concern, it is clear that much more devastation could result from a more conventional attack.

    Recent analyses of the effect of a plane crashing onto the storage buildings of Sellafield indicate a release of far larger amounts of radioactivity[6] than occurred in the Chernobyl disaster, with proportionately[7] larger exclusion zones.

    It is clear that Sellafield has no defence against such a plane crash, either accidental or as a deliberate act of terrorism. An accurate hit by a plane would quite realistically cause sufficient breach of storage facilities to produce 50% loss of Caesium-137 and other exceedingly dangerous waste, causing these exclusion zones. For the next century at least, the land in those zones would be unusable for habitation, cultivation or even travelling across. These areas would cover much of central UK but may extend to other European countries, and 'tolerable' contamination would extend far beyond the exclusion zones, eventually covering the world in the same way that Chernobyl affected farming the UK and elsewhere.

    The effects in terms of rapid loss of life and long term trends in deaths from the effects of mutations and cancers and would be far greater, environmental damage would be severe, and the world economy would be damaged for several generations.

    Such a situation cannot be ruled out, and the official attitude of ignoring risk for commercial reasons is totally unacceptable. The infrastructure required for storing, processing and moving nuclear materials is in acute need of review.

    SGR therefore calls for an urgent and comprehensive review of the risks of continuing to maintain a British nuclear industry, and that such a review should:

    Consider in full the undeniable risks of terrorism and accidents associated with these industries, and Reappraise the effective public subsidy that the UK nuclear industry continues to enjoy and in the light of these, re-evaluate the still limited support which renewable energy and energy-efficiency measures get from the UK Government. In addition SGR urges that they are defenceless against attack.

    BNFL face in full, and not be protected from, its estimated £34 billion bill[8] for decommissioning of old reactors and disposal of waste. Immediate measures should be implemented to counter terrorist or accidental breaches of high-level waste storage facilities or nuclear power facilities anywhere in Britain and to determine and acknowledge any other aspects of the industry where accidents could cause massive danger to life.

    His End Time Watchmen

    Muhammad, Islam and Terrorism

    Did Muhammad and Islam practice Terrorism?
    Enter Here and read for your self.

    Muslim Terrorist are following in Muhammad's foot steps. The Majority of Muslims in the world view America as the last great wall that stops Islam. In their mind, America must be brought down, by any means necessary. This is what motivates Muslims in America to speak of a day when America will fall to Islam's power. So how do most Muslims living in America fit in? What does the future for Islam in America hold? One thing we are certain of; it holds terrorism.

    There are many terrorist organizations throughout the world. Most have in common the same roots. Islamic, Communist and Marxist-Lennon idiologies.

    Enter Here and study the Terrorist Organization Profiles. Best to be well educated in all facts these days!

    And Good American Citizens!

    Jihad in the West Jihad in the West, 'Muslim Conquests from the 7th to the 21st Centuries' by Paul Fregosi Prometheus Books, New York, 1998 Reviewed by Sharon Morad, Leeds
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Preface (pp. 15-18) There is a link between terrorism known as Jihad today, with wars of Muslim expansion beginning with Muhammad.

    All expressions of Islam's basic distaste for the outside world.

    Most Muslims claim crusades are the origin of the conflict between Islam and Christianity, but this is the wrong way around. The first crusade was in 1096 AD. Jihad had already been going on for 500 years by then.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Introduction The Holy War that Isn't (pp. 19-27) Definition of Jihad: not attempt to convert people to Islam by force (except maybe in the 1st century of Islam).

    Rather, attempt to "expand and extend Islam until the whole world is under Muslim rule. The jihad is essentially a permanent state of hostility that Islam maintains against the rest of the world, with or without fighting for more sovereignty over more territory" (20). It is a duty, an obligation for all Muslims.

    [p.22] A contrast between Christ (He who lives by the sword will die by the sword), with Muhammad (the sword is the key to heaven and hell).

    Christians who kill are ignoring the words of Christ. Muslims who kill are obeying Muhammad. [p.23] Crusades - 1096 AD until 1270 AD. An attempt to retake (formerly Christian) Palestine.

    Jihad = 1,300 years. An attempt to occupy Europe, Asia and Africa, and then Islamicize them. [p. 25] Why do we not hear of the Muslim capture of Jerusalem from the Christians in 638 AD, or of the capture of Spain about 70 years later, or of the subsequent 800 year occupation?

    It was the success of Jihad against Europe that triggered Pope Urban II to call for the first Crusade in 1095 AD.

    Colonialism - not exclusively western. Muslim lands colonized much of Europe in the 7th - 19th centuries, and the two colonized each other in the 19th century.

    In fact Europe colonized Muslim lands for only 130 years (1830s - 1960s)!! [p. 26] Muslims have freedom of worship in Christian lands, not vice versa (penalty of apostasy = death).

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Part One: The Days of the Prophet Chapt. 1: The Beginning: Mecca 570-622 (pp. 31-33) A summary of the traditional accounts of Muhammad's life, describing Islam as being "essentially a patriotic movement aimed at asserting Arabian independence and prestige" (p.32)

    Chapt. 2: Gabriel Cometh: Medina (pp. 34-39)

    A traditional account of the early followers and opposition. Unfaltering description of the Qur'anic revelation.

    A description of the clash between Muhammad and Abu Sufyan (Umayyad originator). Early days, Muslims at risk, and Hijra to Medina.

    Perhaps a pious exaggeration of dangers in Mecca. Those that remained were undisturbed.

    Chapt. 3: The First Battles (pp. 40-45)

    A description of the early days in Medina.

    Quarrels between Ansars and Muhajirun.

    Problems with the Jewish tribes.

    Poets writing verses mocking Muhammad.

    Muhammad establishing his authority - intrigue, manoeuvering , assassinations, wars, monetary gains thru caravan raids.

    Battles Nakhla = success Badr = success (angels helped) Abu Jahl (enemy from Mecca) executed, head given to Muhammad.

    Poets Female: Asthma bint Marwan, killed for making disrespectful verse. Male: Abu Afak and Kab, both killed.

    Terror is effective, as many people became loyal as a result. Jews: one tribe forced to leave (without possessions)

    Chapt. 4: A man of Many Parts (pp. 46-51) Many examples of Muhammad's cruelty.

    Torturing a Jew until he revealed a gold store.

    Killing and robbing tribesmen to whom he had given hospitality (killing by cutting off hands and feet so they bled to death).

    Had a number of pious followers willing to act as assassins. This is different from the Muhammad of the Muslim psyche. In the Muslim psyche he is kind, helps the poor, saves baby girls, is nice to 11 wives.

    Combination of religion and politics. The Qur'an occasionally addresses Muhammad's enemies with vengeance, and helps Muhammad out with exemptions from laws or answers , or knotty problems.

    Chapt. 5: When the Killing Had to Stop (pp. 52-55) Battle at Mt. Uhud was the first major defeat for Muhammad, but Abu Sufyan does not follow up his advantage. Two years later, the Meccans attack Medina, but due to a big trench which had been dug, their attack failed.

    Kihouna - Jewish chief at Khaybar; had a fortune in gold, was tortured by Muhammad in order to reveal the whereabouts of his gold (46). When he was dead, Muhammad married his 17 year old widow, Safiya, that same day (54).

    Killing by subordinates was routine.

    An assassination attempt of Abu Sufyan was foiled, but not completely useless, as four others were taken instead.

    Zaid (Muhammad's adopted son) avenged a raid on a Medinan caravan, killed a middle-aged woman named Um Kirfa, along with her daughter, and two sons, by tying her legs to camels and having them pull her to pieces. Muhammad congratulated him on his return saying it was a job well done.

    When Muhammad returned to Mecca there was not much bloodshed, only a poet, a minor singer and one or two others.

    Chapt. 6: A Man of His Time (pp. 56-59) Basically a summary of preceding chapters with a special comment that Muhammad's actions weren't so much worse than other men of his time, but he was a hypocrite for preaching love and mercy at the same time; and in any case his life in history is nothing like his mage in Islam today.

    Now a comment on the slaughter of the Jewish Beni Quraiza tribe (660-800 men slain, wives and children sold as slave). Soldiers receive large amounts of booty (Muhammad gets 1/5). The Qur'an (S. 33:25) praises God for the killings because with them Muhammad becomes feared.

    Chapt. 7: Of Banes and Stones (pp. 60-64) A summary of the traditional account of the compilation of the Qur'an; some early controversy about it and the Mut'azilites. Throughout history other Muslims have challenged the idea of an eternal, uncreated Qur'an. A bit about the Hadith and questions on its reliability.

    Chapt. 8: A Paradise for Warriors (pp. 65-68) Why did outnumbered, under-equipped Arabs make such huge territorial victories so quickly? 1) dissensions between the Christians 2) warfare between the Byzantines and the Persians exhausted both. 3) plunder - either in this life or the next, the soldier of Islam was promised riches and women. There is a detailed and graphic description of Muslim paradise, complete with houris, rivers of wine and the enjoyment of watching those in torment.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Part Two: Beyond Arabia Chapt. 9: Onward Muslim Soldiers: Byzantium and Persia 632-640 AD (pp. 71-75) After the death of Muhammad came the caliphate of Abu Bakr (2 yrs.), Umar (for ten years, then assassinated), followed by Uthman. Uthman was the descendant of Abu Sufyan, the implacable enemy of Muhammad.

    630 AD was the first battle outside of Arabia - against the Byzantines in Jordan. Muhammad ordered two campaigns just before his death:

    Usama - led troops to the north Khalid - captured Baghdad (he was a great general later on of the Umayyads)

    Fall of Jerusalem, Damascus (635) and Antioch (636) Muawiyya was active in the campaign against Syria. He was declared the governor of Syria by Umar in 640 AD. By 641 AD much of Egypt and Persia had fallen

    Islam (poor) Sword (middle class) Tribute (rich)

    Chapt. 10: The Island Campaign: Cyprus, Rhodes, and Crete 649-668 AD (pp. 76-82) A summary of the civil war between Muawiyya and Ali, establishment of the Umayyad caliphate. Ali - 4th caliph, had capital in Basra. Muawiyya accuses him of complicity in Uthman's murder. 657 - battle at Siffin. Ali's troops stop fighting when Muawiyya's appeal to the Qur'an for a verdict. The Kharajites leave Ali and one of them murders him. Muawiyya is the caliph between 661-680, with his capital in Damascus. The Umayyads rule until 749 - then the Abbasids take over and rule until 1258 AD. Abbasid rule - was anti-Umayyad, with much destruction of any references to them. Thus we know very little about the Umayyads.

    We do know that Muawiyya was a good leader, was an imperialist, had wanted to take ships to attack the Mediterranean islands, but Umar refused (Umar like many Arabs, was afraid of the sea). But Uthman gave him permission to attack Cyprus in 649, first from Saida (Lebanon) and then from Alexandria.

    The first major Arab naval enterprise brought great booty. Later the Arabs left when the island promised to pay tribute. Crete was raided in 653 AD. Rhodes was raided in 653.

    The "Saracens" remanined there 5 years, stripped the island bare, melted down the giant bronze colossus (one of the 7 wonders of the ancient world). Sicily was raided in 668 AD (at which time Muawiyya was now the caliph and not simply a general) Advancement to Constantinople and a 6 year siege.

    Chapt. 11: Checkmate on the Bosphorus: Constantinople 668-673 (pp. 83-86) The dream of conquering Constantinople, greatest city of the east. In 668 there was an amphibious assault. An expedition sails from Syria, the Arab headquarters established on the island of Cyticus (a few miles south in the straits). Siege for 7 years.

    The Byzantines had a secret weapon, a flaming mixture of 'naphtha', sulphur and pitch poured down on the attackers.

    Eventually, Muawiyya realized he couldn't take the city. The problem was that many of his ships were burnt, so he loaded as many soldiers as possible on the remaining ships. 30,000 soldiers were left to march back through Anatolia. The infantry was destroyed by the Byzantines during this retreat until there was a peace settlement, which forced Muawiyya to pay a tribute to Constantinople.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Part Three: The Iberian Venture Chapt. 12: The Toledo Whore: Spain 710 Legend: the King Rodrigo of Spain seduces the daughter of count Julian of Morocco. In retaliation, Julian sides with the Emir Musa, a Muslim ruler of North Africa, based in Tunisia. Musa's dream was to invade through Spain and France and meet Muslims invading from the east, so that Islam would surround the Mediterranean.

    Chapt. 13: The Mountain of Tarik: Spain 711 (pp. 93-96) The Caliph al-Walid authorizes the invasion of Spain, so the Musa and his commander, Tarik, with the count Julian as advisor, cross from Tangier to Gibralter (then called Jabil Tarik).

    Spain - peasants oppressed by aristocracy. Internal dissension especially against Jews. They were now ruled by the Visigoths, who were complacent and corrupt. The first battle, on the banks of the Guadelete river was a decisive victory for the Muslims. King Rodrigo was killed and his head sent back to Damascus. The Muslims called Iberia al-Andalus and immediately began the campaign to take it all and head on for France.

    Chapt. 14: A Conqueror's Fate: Spain 711-715 (pp. 97-100) Musa had commanded Tarik to wait for reinforcements, but the general ignored him, dividing the army into 2 parties, one heading for Cordova and the other for Toledo. The inhabitants fled and the cities and booty were taken without a fight.

    Musa arrived with reinforcements in 712 en route to Toledo. He captured several other cities; Carmona, Medina, Sidonia, and Seville. Often the Jews helped the Muslims as liberators.

    By 715 nearly all of Spain was under Muslim occupation. Leaving his son in charge, Musa returned to Damascus to report, but the new Caliph, Suleiman, feared his victories and had him banished to live as a beggar in a town in Arabia.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Part Four: Islam Unfolds Chapt. 15: The Forgotten Isaurian: Constantinople 717-718 (pp. 103-106) Leo the Isaurian, Anatolian and Byzantine emperor repelled the second Muslim attack on Constantinople in 717AD, initiated by Suleiman, consisting of 120,000 Arabs and Persians by land and 100,000 by sea. Leo filled the granaries and the citizens watched with full bellies as the besiegers starved throughout the winter. The Arab supply ships were destroyed by Greek fire. A final doom for the Muslims came about when the Bulgarians joined the Greeks against them. The retreat was ordered, again, 30,000 by land, the rest by sea.

    Chapt. 16: The Dhimmis: Dar-al-Islam from the Seventh Century Onwards (pp. 107-109) Dhimmis could not carry weapons, ride horses, wear shoes, ring church bells, wear anything green, or fight back against a Muslim assault. Proclaiming Jesus' divinity and conversion from Islam were capital offenses. Muslim rulers were not anxious for converts because Dhimmis were more valuable economically, as they paid tribute and were the slave labour.

    Chapt. 17: Forays into France: The Langvredoc 718-732 (pp. 110-115) The Spaniards began the Reconquista in 718 (ended in 1492). They started out as resistance movements. Pelayo ruled a tiny territory and ran guerrilla raids against the Muslims.

    Muslims began moving north. Al-Semak led the first invasion across the Pyrenees in 721, establishing a base at Norbonne. He was succeeded by Abderaman, who moved up the Rhone as far as Lyon and Dijon; specially targeting churches and monasteries. Then he moved on to Bordeaux. Between Poitiers and Tours, there was a clash between Abduraman and Charles Martel.

    Chapt. 18: The Hammer of the Franks: Tours 732-759 (pp. 116-121) Summary of the battle of Poitiers (or Tours) where Charles Martel turned back Abderaman's advance. There was lots of fighting in the south of France (to the west in Langredoc under ibd-al-Malik, up the Rhone river again, east to Piedmont in Italy). The Muslims helped by Christian allies, began quarrelling with each other.

    737 - Charles Martel retakes Avignon and continues to recapture Muslim strongholds until in 739 he reaches Marscilles.

    741 - Charles Martel dies and is succeeded by Pepin the Short. Te Muslims are effectively driven out of France by this time.

    Chapt. 19: The Umayyad Takeover: Spain 756-852 (pp. 122-129) 749 - the end of the Umayyad caliphate in Damascus. The new Abbasid rulers try to kill off all the remaining Umayyads. Abu al-Abbas manages to murder them all, but one, Abd al-Rahman, who escaped to Spain. Al-Abbas sent an army after him, but al-Rahman defeated it and established hi control over al-Andalus. Charlemagne invaded from the north, but had to return to France to fight the Germans.

    So Abd al-Rahman was able to consolidate his power over his Muslim subjects.

    (788-796) - Hisham I - succeeded Abd al-Rahman. Muslims invaded France, but turned back by the Christians there.

    (796-822) - al-Itakam succeeded Hisham I. There was violent and quarrelling dissension even among the Muslim subjects. Notorious for massacres. In 801 Louis I (son of Charlemagne) invaded. Turned back, and also had troubles with the Basques.

    (822-852) - Abd al-Rahman II - relatively peaceful, focussed on his 97 children. Exception - execution of nearly 1 dozen Christians of Cordova, who deliberately sought martyrdom by insulting the prophet.

    Chapt. 20: The Long Resistance: Sicily 827-902 (pp. 130-134) Conquest of Sicily began in 827 AD, though it had been raided several times earlier. The conquest took place when Admiral Euphemius of the Byzantine navy rebelled against discipining action for marrying a nun.

    He joined up with the emir of Tunisia. The campaign was slow and bloody, complete with many massacres. From Sicily they took other islands (Corsica, Malta, Sardinia, Pantellerva), and then marched on to Italy, reaching Rome and pillaging the churches of St. Peter's and St. Paul's in 846 AD. In Sicily the Arab occupation lasted 264 years. In 1091 AD the Normans defeated the Saracens.

    Chapt. 21: The French Riviera Campaign: St. Tropez 898-973 (pp. 135-139) Muslim sailors landed at St. Tropez and began a disjointed pattern of conquest. All throughout the Riviera, in the Alps, cutting off France from Italy. Many settled and intermarried. Slowly the tide began to turn and in places Muslims were being pushed out. But a weak and divided Christendom was singularly unfit for the task.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Part Five: For Spain, My Humble Duty Chapt. 22: The Corpses of Simancas: Spain 912-961 (pp. 143-148) Incoherent, disorganised battles between Muslims and Christians and between different groups on each side characterised the early 10th century. Abd Al-Rahman III (912-961) decides to establish order.

    (He was following on the heals of Abdalla (882-912), a notoriously cruel caliph. After the surrender of the Castle of Polei he ordered the decapitation of all Christians unless they converted – only one took that offer and survived.) Abd al-Rahman III re-established the authority of Cordova, putting down insurgent Muslim cities and waging war against Christian kingdoms of the north.

    But the Reconquista continued to grind on. The Christians won a major victory at Simancas while Abd al-Rahman was preoccupied with Muslim rebels in the south. But the Christians did not follow up on their victory, preferring instead to settle for peace with the Muslims and internal dissension at home.

    Chapt. 23: Aurora's Lover: Santiago De Compostela 967-1002 (pp. 149-152) Ibn Abi Amir (a.k.a. "Almanzor") seduced the wife of Caliph Hakim II and became vizier of al-Andalus. He became especially powerful when his lover's 5-year-old son, al-Hisham II became caliph. In 981 Almanzor lead the Muslim conquest of Zamora and executed over 4000 Christians. As a sign of his religious zeal he copied the whole Qur'an by hand and carried it around with him on campaigns.

    He also helped to build a mosque with his own hands. In the face of internecine warfare on the Christian side, Almanzor took Rueda, Barcelona, a group of villages in Castile and Leon, the shrine of Santiago De Compostela (reputed burial site of St. James), and Caneles.

    Each campaign was followed by a massacre of prisoners and civilians, the burning of the town and desecration of churches and monasteries. The great bells of Santiago de Compostela were carried off to Cordova on the backs of Christian slaves to be hung in the new mosque built by Almanzor. In 1002 Almanzor died of illness on the return from capturing Caneles.

    Chapt. 24: Exeunt the Umayyads: Spain 1085 (pp. 153-155) Muslim empire : The Abbasid empire was divided with the Buhaywids in Iraq and Persia, Damanids in China, Fatimids in Syria, Egypt, eastern North Africa, Sicily and the Hijaz.

    The Spanish Caliphate was the de facto ruler of western North Africa until disunity among Muslims in Spain lead to the fall of the Umayyads in 1031 followed by "taifas," a collection of ~30 little Muslim statelets each ruled by their own king. In contrast, the Christians were making attempts to unify.

    But not much was done in the way of jihad or reconquista, though the latter gained momentum in the closing decades of the 11th century, culminating with the reconquest of Toledo in 1085.

    Chapt. 25: The Desert Warrior: Zalaca 1085-1086 (pp. 156-160) 1085- reconquest of Toledo stimulates the "taifa" of Seville to ask for help from the Almoravid leader, Yusuf ibn Tashufin. The Almoravids were a puritanical movement, following the Maliki school of jurisprudence.

    Yusuf, a military genius, came eager to fight against Christians and with the intention of remaining in Spain. The kings of the Muslim taifas chose Islam over Spain, they preferred the suzerainty of Africa rather than the Christian kingdom of Castile. Near Badajoz, at the Battle of Zalaca (a.k.a. Sagrajas), Yusuf defeated the Castilian army of Alfonso VI. >24,000 Christians were slaughtered and their heads shipped to all the main towns of al-Andalus and North Africa. Yusuf then returned to North Africa to tidy up affairs in his kingdom there.

    Chapt. 26: Mio Cid: Valencia 1080-1108 (pp. 161-167) El-Cid, born Rodrigo Diaz de Biuar, one of the heroes of the Reconquista, a tactical genius. He was estranged from Alfonso VI while the king appeared to be making progress against the Muslim taifas, but after Zalaca el-Cid and his knights joined the Christian knights of Leon and Castile in their assault on Valencia.

    After a 20 month siege Valencia was taken and its ruler burned alive. After that Yusuf and the Almoravids returned from Marrakech to retake Valencia. Their attempt to starve the city into submission failed when el-Cid led his troops in an attack that scattered the invaders. It was not until el-Cid's death in 1099 that Valencia was retaken for Islam.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Part Six: Deflection in the South Chapt. 27: Liberation in Lusitania: Portugal 1079-1147 (pp. 171-174) The French knight, Henry of Burgundy, came to crusade against Islam on behalf of Alfonso VI of Castile and Leon. (Many French knights were at this time answering the appeal of the pontiff in Rome to save Spain from the Saracens). Henry married the daughter of Alfonso VI and was given the fiefdom of Portugal. His son, Alfonso Henrique, freed Portugal from the Muslims with the assistance of a fleet of 164 vessels carrying hundreds of crusaders bound for the Holy Land who stopped in Portugal and decided to stay.

    After the Christians reconquered Lisbon in 1147 they massacred the Muslim inhabitants and turned their attention against their Castilian overlords. By 1171 nearly all the Muslims had been expelled from Portugal and the Portuguese had established independence from Castile. In 1185 Alfonso Henrique died, king of an independent country.

    Chapt. 28: Whence the Greeks and Normans: Sicily 1025-1091 (pp. 175-181) 961-Byzantines had retaken Crete from the Muslims 1035-Byzantine general, Giorgios Maniakes, assisted by the Viking Harold Hadrada, invaded Sicily.

    1038-Byzantine victory at Rametta, however, no permanent landing was made because of fighting with the Normans in Italy and intrigues in the Byzantine court. The Normans had been brought to Italy as mercenaries in the wars between little Italian statelets.

    In 1061 a contingent of >2000 Normans landed on Sicily, ready to fight both with Muslims and Greeks. Initially a war between roving bands, in 1084 it took on more religious overtones for the Christians when the Muslims of southern Italy burned down the churches of Reggio and enslaved the monks of the Rocco d-Asino monastery.

    1091-Noto, the last Muslim stronghold in Sicily, surrendered. After the conquest of Sicily was complete mot of the Muslim population co-operated with their conquerors, some even joining the Norman army. A few rebellions were put down among those who would not co-operate, but a Muslim population remained until 1300 when the remnant was deported or forcibly converted to Christianity.

    Chapt. 29: The African Take-over: Spain 1104-1212 (pp 182-191) Yusef and the Almoravids introduced the North African rule of Spain. Spain became a secondary battlefield when war broke out between 2 rival Berber sects, the Almoravids and the Almorhads. This internecine "jihad" (so-called by the mullahs on each side) were often as fierce as those against the Christians. This infighting finally assured Spanish victory in Spain.

    During the 12th century many of the Orders of Christian warriors were founded (e.g. Knights of Calatrava, Knights of Santiago, Knights of our Lady of Montjoie) They began to play a crucial role in the Liberation of Spain from the Moors in the 13th century. By 1114 the North Africans had taken nearly all the Muslim taifas and were pushing north.

    This conflict roused Christendom as if it were a crusade, and many knights, veterans of the reconquest of Jerusalem in 1097, poured in to defend Spain. After some back and forth movement (complicated by power struggles between the Christian kingdoms) the tide began to move against the Moors.

    The collapse of the Almoravids was not caused by the Christians, but by the Almorhads, who invaded Spain in 1146 and by 1150 were rulers of al-Andalus. (The Almoravids were desert nomads, ancestors of today's Tuareg, and the Almorhads were peasant farmers and pastoralists from the Atlas mountains. They had little in common but love of Islam, hatred of each other, and the practices of slaver and violence.) Once firmly in power the Almorhads continued the Jihad in Spain.

    1195 – Battle of Alarcos – fought between Alfonso VIII of Castile and the Almorhad el-Mansur. Expected Christian victory turned into a terrible defeat, which shook the rest of Western Europe. The pope (Celestine III) then intervened on behalf of Christian unity. He excommunicated the Leonese king who had formed an alliance with the Muslims, demanded the co-operation of rival kings against the Moors, and sent some crusaders to Spain instead of to the Holy Land.

    Chapt. 30: The Year of Decision: Las Navos de Tolosa 1212 (pp. 192-196) King Alfonso VIII of Castile called together the largest Christian army ever assembled in Spain, >100,000 men. This army met the Almohads at Las Navos de Tolosa. After fierce fighting the Moors were routed. After the Christian victory 1 million Moors migrated back to Africa. And the Christian campaign pressed forward.

    Chapt. 31:The Muslim Debacle: Spain 1212-1250 (pp. 197-200) La Reconquista took nearly 800 years to finally rid Spain of the colonial invaders. Stage I: 710-1080 – retake 1st 1/3 of Iberia Stage II: 1080-1210 – retake 2nd 1/3 of Iberia, including Portugal

    Stage III: 1210-1250 – retake last 1/3 (except Grenada) Most important battles: Simancas, Zalaca, Alarcos, Las Navos de Tolosa Key Christian Leaders: Fernando III of Castile, Jaime I of Aragon. Most of the Christian soldiers were knights of military orders. The Muslims helped to destroy themselves. Some joined the Christians as mercenaries, the rest fought among themselves for power (in the 1220's there were 3 rival caliphs in Spain.)

    The Spanish Muslims could expect no help from North Africa, which was embroiled in its own civil war. Muslim leaders rose and were swiftly decapitated by their fellows as the Christians moved inexorably south.

    Chapt. 32: Five Cities to Go: Andalusia 1230-1248 (pp. 201-205) The Almohads were expelled from Spain in 1230, after their departure five cities still remained in Muslim hands:

    Cordova – reconquered by Fernando III of Castile. The bells of the mosque of Cordova, which had been made for Santiago de Compostela and were carried by Christian slaves to Cordova upon the order of Almanzor, 300 years earlier, were now carried back to Compostela by Muslim slaves upon the order of Fernando III. La Reconquista had come a full circle.

    Seville – reconquered by Fernando III of Castile after the Muslim population assassinated their leader for suggesting they surrender. Instead the siege last 2 years and 2 months before the inhabitants finally surrendered and emigrated to Morocco in 1248.

    Grenada – became a vassal state of Castile Jaen - surrendered to Fernando III of Castile by its Muslim governor in exchange for permission to rule Grenada as a vassal of Castile.

    Valencia – reconquered by Jaime I of Aragon. The Muslim king quickly capitulated because he wanted to convert to Christianity.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Part Seven: Onslaught from the East Chapt. 33: The Ottoman Advent: Turkey Mid-1200's (pp. 209-211) 1250- Turkey - Othman, son of Ertognil, is born. His tribe begins moving into Anatolia fighting the Byzantines on the west and the Mongols on the east.

    The Mongols had been sweeping across central Asia. In 1258, Hulagu (grandson of Ghengis Khan) took Baghdad. After the adoption of Islam the Turkish advance on Europe became a holy war. In a short time they became the most feared threat to Eastern Europe, twice nearly reaching Vienna.

    Chapt. 34: The Mongolian Horde: Russia 1340-1480 (pp. 212-205) Mongols – during their overrunning of central Asia they had no formal religion, practising a vague sort of shamanism. After conquering Muslim lands they adopted Islam (mid-13th cen,) and then moved north into Russia (at that time ruled by Lithuania in the east and Nougorad in the north.)

    1223, Mongol victory by the river Kalka. 1237 – Mongols crossed the Volga and conquered Russian principalities one after another. The society ruled by the Mongols was a mixture of Mongols, Turks, Russians, Armenians and Greeks.

    Late 14th century a Russian vassal state ruled from Moscow rebelled against the Mongols. After initial success they were trounced by and Moscow sacked. But the Mongols did not stay so far north for long. They remained in the south where they gradually disintegrated into different states. Those in the Crimea became known as the Tartars.

    15th century - Russia was becoming a unified state. 1480 – Russia refused to pay tribute to the Mongols. The two armies faced off and disperse without a battle, effectively a victory for Russia.

    1491 – Final battle of Mongols in Europe at Zasalvi in Poldavia, where a Polish army defeated a mixed Tartar-Turkish force.

    Chapt.35: Janissaries Ahoy: Thrace 1301-1353 (pp 216-218) Othman I – gave his name to the Ottoman Empire and little else. He didn't fight much, just moved his people into sparsely populated areas of Asia Minor. Orkhan I – son of Othman. Sultan in 1326 and made Bursa his capital.

    Byzantine Empire – throne contested by John Cantacuzene and John V (a child, his widowed mother was protecting his claim to his father's throne). John Cantracuzene invited the Ottomans into Europe to support his claim.

    1345 - 1st Ottoman excursion across the Dardanelles 1349 – Byzantines ask for Ottoman help against Bulgaria 1353 – Turks establish their first permanent European settlement in Gallipoli.

    Orkhan I created the Janissary force – originally drawn from Christian slaves removed from their families as children. They were raised to be an elite fighting corp, loyal to the sultan alone. For the next 300 years, they were the best fighting force in Europe. (Janissaries were generally converted to Islam, sometimes by force, sometimes willingly.)

    Chapt. 36: The Gay Revolt: Thrace 1376-1388 (pp. 291-223) Under Orkhan I the Ottomans conquered Thrace. Europe was in its usual disarray. The French and English were beginning their 100 years war. Genoa and Venice were in a 30 years war. Spain endured internecine warfare between Christian kingdoms.

    In Germany the Black Death raged. Lithuania and Hungary were fighting over the Ukraine. Russia was fighting the Mongols and the Balkans were resisting Hungarian imperialism.

    Murad I (Othman's son) – began the first serious Ottoman invasion of Europe and tripled the size of the Empire. Pope Urban V, afraid of a renewed Muslim invasion from North Africa and the rising Ottoman threat in the Balkans, called upon Catholic Hungary and Orthodox Serbia to stop the Turks.

    1371 –1st important Eastern European response to Jihad. Christians were stopped by Muslims at Cenomen. 1st conflict between Janissaries and their Christian relations, also 1st between Turks and the Serbs. Murad cleverly intervened in the Byzantine civil war between the rival "Johns", supporting now one, now the other.

    The sons of John V and Murad began having an affair and also planned to overthrow their fathers. The coup was halted, and Murad was so enthusiastic that he launched a new invasion of Europe. Sofia fell in 1385 and Salonika in 1387.

    Chapt. 37: The Field of Blackbirds: Kosovo 1389 (pp 224-230) King of Serbia (Lazar I), threatened by advancing Ottomans, gathered together a force of Serbians, Wallachians, Bosnians and Albanians to oppose the invaders. The Christian force outnumbered the Muslims, but a well-timed addition of Janissaries to the fight turned the tide and the Ottomans won.

    Murad was wounded and ordered the execution of King Lazar before himself dying. The new sultan, Bajazet, immediately ordered his brother Yakub to be strangled. Yakub had led the counterattack that turned the battle against the Christians and might have proved a little too popular for the new sultan's comfort. (The execution of surviving siblings proved to be a common political manoeuvre in the Ottoman court.)

    Chapt. 38: The Wild Knights of France: Nicopolis 1396 (pp. 231-239) King Sigismund of Hungary sent envoys to France to plead for protection against the invaders. The 100 years war had just taken a breather and French knights were happy to head off to Hungary with the blessing of the pope.

    The purpose of the expedition of these ~10,000 knights was to retake Nicopolis on the Bulgarian side of the Danube. The brought no siege equipment, trusting on their courage to route the Turks. Instead, Nicopolis held, waiting for reinforcements, which Bajazet duly brought.

    Against the advice of Sigismund, the French knights rushed to meet the enemy – straight into a trap, rows and rows of sharpened stakes planed in the ground so the French were forced to dismount or disembowel their horses. Effectively helpless on the ground, the French were massacred, Bulgaria became an Ottoman vassal, and Hungary remained in danger.

    One of the surviving French knights returned to France and brought a small force to assist in the siege of Constantinople. For a time the French forced the Turks to lift the siege by land and sea, but the eventual fall of Constantinople was really delayed by the invasion of the Mongol Timurlane who was leading his troops across Asia from Samarkand. He defeated Bajazet and established himself as sultan.

    Chapt. 39: The Hungarian Hero: Varna 1444 (pp 240-247) The Ottoman empire quickly degenerated into a 4-sided civil war. The Serbs foolishly sided with a prince that lost and were massacred in their thousands for their folly. Eventually only one claimant survived, Mahomet I, an exceptionally humane and just ruler. He signed peace treaties with Venice and Constantinople. His son, Murad II, resumed the invasion of Europe.

    In the Balkans he had been facing two resistance movement, one lead by Janas Hunyadi of Hungary and one led by John Castriot of Albania, and Murad was eager to make up his lack of prestige.

    1443- The Hungarians, Poles, Serbs, Wallachians, and Germans untied under the Hungarian king Ladislaus and went out to face the advancing Turkish army.

    The vastly outnumbered Christians defeated the Turks, but, inexplicably, within sight of the Turkish capital King Ladislaus pulled back and signed a treaty with Murad.

    A year later the Hungarians changed their mind and started the war again, this time marching as far as Varna (where they were supposed to receive aid from Venetian ships which never arrived.) This time the Christians were soundly defeated by a renewed Muslim force.

    Chapt. 40: The Last Agony: Constantinople 1453 (pp 245-259) In 1453 Constantinople fell, unaided by any European ally except a few hundred troops from Genoa. Beset by internal quarrels, the European states did not notice until it was too late.

    The next thing they knew, Turkey was the most powerful state in Europe. Suleiman the Magnificent was far more powerful than his contemporaries Elizabeth of England, Charles V of Austria or Francois I of France.

    (Pg. 249) "They feared the Turks. The Turks did not fear them. The Turkish threat was for centuries the main concern of all the European nations, and every European man and woman lived in terror of the Turks. They feared the Muslim Turks much more than they ever feared the Nazi Germans or the Communist Russians, and for much, much longer. The Nazi peril lasted 10 years. Soviet imperialism lasted 70 years. The Turkish threat lasted 500 years."

    Since its founding in 658 Constantinople had been besieged 29 times. Frequently by the Muslims (during the initial Arab conquests and then a frequent Ottoman activity), but occasionally by Catholic Christians who sacked the Orthodox city en route to the Holy Land on the crusades.

    Mahomet II determined to take Constantinople and the few hundred square mile remaining of the once glorious Roman empire. 1st he besieged the city, and waited. He made a treaty with the Catholic Hungarian Janas Hunyadi to ensure peace on his northern front. Mahomet was not a pious man.(rather he was fond of blaspheming the prophet, murder, and homosexual activity) and this war barely pretended to be a Jihad, rather it was straightforward imperialism.

    The Turks attacked the city relentlessly from 6 April to 29 October. Despite determined resistance and the addition of the Genoese troops, the city walls fell. The night of 28 October the remaining citizens crowded into St. Sophia's Cathedral for a final service.

    The next day the city was overwhelmed, the soldiers slaughtered, the civilians enslaved, and the women raped – beginning with the convent. St. Sophia was declared as mosque, as it has remained to this day.

    But the Ottomans had to make long term arrangements for the surviving Christians throughout the empire, most of whom refused to convert, so they commanded the remaining Orthodox priests to appoint a new patriarch, who could shepherd his little flock at the will of the Sultan.

    Chapt. 41: The Road to Rome: Belgrade 1456 (pp 260-264)After the fall of Constantinople, Mahomet II set his sights on Rome and turned his army north toward the Balkans. In the next few years he conquered 12 kingdoms and 200 cities. 1st, Peloponnese, the remaining part of Greece, then Bosnia.

    At its surrender the king and heir were promised their lives, but shortly they were executed as the Grand Mufti argued that agreements with unbelievers were invalid. The population generally converted to Islam so as to avoid the same fate, a crime for which the Serbs, who remained Orthodox, have never forgiven them. Serbia fell next, but for a time Albania held out under the leadership of John Castriot (a.k.a. Skanderbeg) until 1468.

    Hungary, still with Janos Hunyadi at the head of the army, stood firm and called for a crusade to protect Belgrade. Hunyadi's victory there proved a major setback to the Ottomans.

    After 15 years of fighting in the Balkans Mahomet II decided to try a sea assault against Italy. But plans went awry when he announced his plans to keep the plunder for himself and his Janissaries refused to attack. Mahomet died before leaving Asia Minor. The pope called for a crusade to protect southern Italy.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Part Eight: By Land and by Sea Chapt. 42: The Sigh of the Moor: Granada 1492 (pp 267-274) Mahomet II's death triggered a power struggle between his two sons, Bayazid and Djem. Bayazid won, exiled his brother and established the Ottoman navy as a significant power in the Mediterranean.

    Muslim-Christian fighting had very much died down in Spain, as only Grenada and a few sea ports remained in Muslim hands. But Morocco sent a stead supply of soldiers, so the Spaniards decided to retake the last of these towns, but the effort was half heart (distracted by things such as the 100 years war between France and England) and took over a century.

    1461 – Ferdinand of Aragon and Isabella of Castile marry and together unify Spain 1480 – Beginning of the serious campaign against Grenada. The final conquest was completed in 1492.

    Chapt. 43: The Ottoman Empire: Selim the Grim 1512-1520 (pp. 275-277) After the fall of Grenada, Hungary plunged into civil war, the aristocracy brutally oppressed the peasantry which rebelled and then were crushed. But the Ottomans were busy elsewhere for the time being and missed their golden opportunity to take Hungary.

    Selim I (1512-1520) built up the navy and nearly doubled the size of the empire through conquests in Asia and Africa. He took for himself the title "caliph" which vastly increased his religious prestige. A devout Sunni, he hated the Shi'a nearly as much as Christians. A strong sadistic streak left a record of hundreds of thousands of executions and goulish torture.

    Chapt. 44: The Red Danube: Manacs 1526 (pp. 278-284) Suleiman the Magnificent succeeded his father Selim in 1520. He did fight 3 wars against Persia, his main Muslim enemy, but the general focus of his imperial policy was west, toward Europe. His navy moved to retake the island of Rhodes, which was defended by the Knightly order of St. John of Jerusalem.

    It fell in 1522 and Suleiman permitted the surviving knights to leave Rhodes unharmed, a gesture he bitterly repented when they moved to Malta and repulsed his attacks 43 years later.

    Previous Jihad campaigns destroyed Serbia, Bulgaria, Wallachia and Bosnia, Albania and Greece. Only remaining was Hungary, which Suleiman was determined to destroy. Wracked by internal dissent and ruled by a foolish playboy, (Louis II), Belgrade fell in 1521.

    Louis II rushed to meet the enemy rather than waiting for reinforcements. The armies met at Mohacs, and the outnumbered Hungarians were destroyed by Turkish guns. During the next two centuries the Ottomans depopulated Hungary (from 4 to 2 /2 million), exporting ~3 million Hungarians as slaves and hunting others like partridges.

    Chapt. 45: The Untaken Capital: Vienna 1529 (pp. 285-287) In 1529 Suleiman moved on Vienna only to find that to his disgust both Charles V and his brother Ferdinand were elsewhere. After 3 weeks of vile weather which prevented the use of Turkish guns Suleiman decided the effort and time needed to take the city wasn't worth the satisfaction of defeating the unimportant general in charge, so he returned to Istanbul.

    Chapt. 46: Sailors, Slaver and Raiders: The Mediterranean 1504-1546 (pp. 288-294) The Muslim fishermen of Grenada established a thriving piracy business from bases in North Africa. The chief commodity was Christian slaves from Spain and Italy.

    The pirates considered their actions to be Jihad, citing sura ix: 5-6 "kill those who join other gods with God wherever ye shall find them; and seize them, besiege them, and lay wait for them with every type of ambush.)

    Slavery was considered to have Qur'anic (and therefore divine) sanction (as compared to Christianity, where, though it has taken place, has nearly always been considered reprehensible.)

    The pirate Barbarossa, based in Algiers, brought the territory he controlled into the Ottoman Empire and then became head of Suleiman's navy. 1535 – Charles V sacked Tunis committing atrocities worthy of the Turks. Generally the Europeans were too preoccupied with fighting each other to spend too much effort on the Ottomans.

    Chapt. 47: In Arms Always and Prepared for Combat: Malta 1565 (pp. 295-308) A shipload of luxury goods was captured and taken to Malta. Investors in the enterprise, including several of the sultan's wives, stood to lose heavily, so they pleaded with Suleiman to attack Malta instead of launching a second attack on Vienna.

    1565, the Ottoman fleet set out for Malta (galleys rowed by Christian slaves). To both sides this was a holy war, the struggle of Islam and Christianity.

    The battle started at St. Elmo, defended by Neapolitan knights who used "Greek fire" and boiling oil against guns and canons. After a month long bombardment, the fortress fell. The siege of Malta continued for 2 ½ months after the fall of St. Elmo.

    The island reached the breaking point, with even women and children joining the battle to defend their 1500 year old faith, first brought to the island by St. Paul.

    At last reinforcements arrived from Sicily and the Ottomans lifted the siege and returned to Istanbul. 30,000 Moors and Turks died. 8,000 of the 9,000 knights of Malta died, as did 5,000 civilians. The Ottomans never attempted to attack Malta again.

    Chapt. 48: The Rhapsody of Death: Hungary 1566 (pp 309-311) As Suleiman marched the largest ever Ottoman army north through the Balkans, he was annoyed by the Hungarians who stubbornly and repeatedly rebelled against their Turkish overlords. Suleiman looked on these rebellions as an affront not only to his personal majesty, but also to God, who had given him the right to rule Hungary. The rebels were brutally slaughtered, but the march to Vienna did not continue, as Suleiman died of a heart attack and was succeeded by his son Selim.

    Chapt. 49: The Alpujarras Rising: Spain 1568-1570 (pp 312-316) 70 years after the fall of Grenada, 100,000 Muslims still lived in Spain, dreaming of the day Islam would return to rule al-Andalus. They were also persecuted in the Inquisition. A secret resistance movement formed, stockpiling arms to aid an eventual invasion from North Africa.

    Revolt broke out in the mountains of Grenada, and King Philip II petitioned the Pope for assistance. The Spanish force (for a time led by Don John) beat back the Moriscos, eventually completely uprooting them from Grenada and scattering them all over Spain.

    Chapt. 50: The Flaying of Bragadino: Famagusta 1571 (pp. 317-321) 1570 – Selim launched an invasion of Cyprus to get a hold of the vineyards. After a year the defense collapsed and the Ottoman general Lala Mustafa had the governor of Cyprus, Bragadino, flayed to death.

    Chapt. 51:A Good Day to Die: Lepanto 1572 (pp. 322-328) 1571 – Pope P ius V founded the Holy League in an attempt to unite Europe against the Muslim invaders. Commander-in-Chief was 25 year old Don John of Austria (who was actually a Spaniard). 1572 – The league sent out a navy of 316 ships which met the Ottoman navy at Lepanto where a mammoth battle took place. The result was a Christian victory that annihilated the Muslim fleet, but bad weather prevented a follow up attack on Istanbul.

    Chapt. 52: Colonialism Muslim Style: Eastern Europe 1574-1681 (pp. 329-339) Turkey was the first major colonial power (100 years before Spain). Following the victory at Lepanto the Holy League fell into disarray, its members preoccupied with quarreling with each other ( e.g. Elizabeth of England and Philippe of Spain).

    Selim II had fallen down in a drunken stupor and cracked his head. He was succeeded by Murad III who didn't encourage much Jihad and allowed the Janissaries to degenerate. Revolts broke out in Transylvania, Moldavia, and Wallachia. The Janissaries rebelled several times and engaged in widespread corruption. Mahomet III led a relatively uneventful reign.

    His son Ahmed I became sultan at age 14 and aside from a brief excursion into Hungary pretty much focused on Persia. Othman II (1618) was jailed and strangled by his own Janissaries (it was during his reign that a British envoy first described the Ottoman Empire as the "sick man of Europe).

    Murad IV (1623) Sultan at age 11, restored order at the price of 100,000 executions and quelled mutinies by the army and the Janissaries. An alcoholic and sadist (killing was a kind of sport to him), he did a few kind deeds, e.g. Ending the tribute in children which had been demanded of Christian villages, and thus he forced the Janissaries to find a new source of manpower.

    Ibrahim, (brother of Murad IV) resumed the Jihad in Europe against the Cossacks, assisted by the Tatars. He also broke a treaty with Venice and attacked Crete. The siege of Candia lasted 20 years, when the Venetians in turn besieged Istanbul.

    The irritated populace and the Janissaries overthrew the sultan. Mahomet IV (1648, age 10) briefly restored the Ottoman empire to its former greatness. He sent an army against the Holy Roman (i.e. Austrian) Empire and defeated the Christian force at the Battle of St.

    Gothard. In 1672, the Ottomans defeated the Poles and Russians, intervening at the request of the Cossacks. In 1681, the war turned around. The Poles and Russians had retaken all the land lost to them, and had made inroads into Ottoman territory.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Part Nine: The Waning of Holy War Chapt. 53: Never was there a victory more complete: Vienna 1683 (pp. 343-348) 1682 – Hungarians revolted against Austria, providing a golden opportunity for the Ottomans, who sent a ½ million man army northward.

    1683 – The Ottoman army, led by Kara Mustafa, besieged Vienna. Anxious not to damage the city he intended to rule, Kara Mustafa decided to starve out the inhabitants. Leopold I of Austria fled, issuing appeals for help from all over Europe. The pope sent prayers. The French promised not to attack Austria. But King John III of Poland (the same John Sobieski who defeated the Turks in four battles in four days a decade earlier) brought an army. 3,000 Polish cavalry and 18,000 Polish and German infantry set out to meet 500,000 Turks.

    The Ottoman encampment was lazy and ill-planned, and the Polish force routed them in a single charge. The flight headed by Kara Mustafa himself (who was duly strangled when he returned to Istanbul).

    Chapt. 54: The Jihad Totters: Greece and Hungary 1685-1699 (pp. 349-353) The Ottoman Empire is collapsing in the centre with corruption and mutinous Janissaries and crumbling at the edges as the Austrians moved steadily on. 1685 - Francisco Morosini leads a force to retake much of the Morea (Peloponnese) for the Greeks. Austrian victory at Gran taking Buda. 1687- Russians besiege Azov.

    Austrian victory at Mohacs taking Croatia and Transylvania. 1688 – Austrians take Budapest. 1690 – Turks regroup, take back Belgrade and renter Kosovo.

    France, threatened by growing Hapsburg strength attacks the Rhineland. 1691 – Austrians defeat Muslims in battle at Salankeman.

    1697 – Battle of Zenta leads to Austrian capture of Sarajevo. 1699 – The treat of Karlowitz as the Turks sue for peace. This is the first time in the history of the Ottoman Empire that it had been forced to send envoys abroad to treat with its foes. This is the turning point. From now on the Turks are on the defensive.

    Chapt. 55: The Gravediggers: Central and Southeastern Europe 1716-1770 (pp. 354-361) Ottoman wars are no longer expansionist, and barely pretend to be religious. The empire is now a major player in European power politics. 1715 – Ottoman navy and army head out to attack the Hapsburgs. They are defeated at Peterwardein (1716) and the Austrians take Belgrade, but instead of taking Istanbul the victorious Hapsburgs sign a peace treaty.

    Sultan Achmed II (ruled 1703-1730) lost a war against Persia in the Caucasuses. Under Mahmoud I the Janissaries revolted. But the empire did not fall because it was alternately supported by different European nations who were trying to maintain a balance of power.

    Western European nations did not want a collapsing Ottoman empire to enhance the power of the Austrians or Russians. Turkey and Russia got into a war over Poland (who knows why?). Austria took more of the Balkans and under Catherine the Great Russia moved south toward the Black Sea.

    Chapt. 56: The Orloff-Suvarov Duet: The Mediterranean and Crimea 1770-1792 (pp 362-36 1770 – Russian navy turns to assist Greek rebellion against Turkey. The Greeks took the opportunity to massacre the local Turks in particularly hideous ways. But the Ottomans managed to restore order with equal severity. The Ottoman navy was nearly destroyed, but most of the Russian sailors were killed in skirmishes around the Med.

    Catherine the Great ordered the Russian army to the Crimea which they took from the Tatars. The resulting peace treaty turned Turkey into a semi-vassal of Russia.

    1783 - Russia incorporated the Crimea into her empire leading, causing a fresh outbreak of war. The threat of Ottoman collapse concerned the rest of Europe./ the resulting peace treaty (1792) pushed the Russian border further south but left the Ottoman empire alive.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Part Ten: Warriors of a Willing Doom Chapt. 57: To the shores of Tripoli: North Africa 1798-1830 (pp 370-379) French occupation of Egypt under Napoleon, who was unable to ally the Egyptians. Instead its Muslim inhabitants fiercely opposed him, calling for Jihad. The Janissaries joined the French, but eventually the Mameluks survived the temporary French presence.

    Napoleon's attack on Egypt was an attempt to strike against the British in India, so when the British threatened Istanbul the French joined the Turks, bringing weapons and modern training.

    The Americans clashed with the Muslims first over the Barbary pirates who annoyed US merchants and embarrassed the navy by capturing a frigate and holding the sailors hostage. A variety of skirmishes took place, ending with a treaty between the US and Algeria in 1815.

    1816 – the British navy bombarded Algiers over its refusal to stop the practice of Christian slavery.

    1830 - An exchange of insults between the French and Algerians deteriorated into warfare resulting in a French victory and the beginning of the French occupation of Algeria for the next 132 years.

    1880s – The French took Tunisia. This was a disorienting change for the Muslims, for whom the natural order of things was Muslim rulers and Christian slaves. They weren't quite sure what to do about the Europeans who were quite certain that the opposite situation was the natural order.

    Chapt. 58: The Surrogates of Pericles: Greece 1821-1827 (pp. 380-388) Rebellions in Wallachia and Moldovia triggered a revolt in Greece. Within a few weeks nearly the entire Turkish population of Morea had been slaughtered, and from the Peloponnese the revolt spread. Now Jihad was primarily a defensive concept to the Turks who fought to retain both their Ottoman nationality and Islamic religion.

    Furious at the deaths of their co-religionists in Greece, Turks turned on Christians throughout the rest of the empire. Simple death was too kind, instead they were brutally tortured, triggering further atrocities by the Greeks in a downward spiral. Philhellics from all over Europe joined the cause of Greek independence.

    Sultan Mahmoud II finally managed to free himself from the tyranny of his imperial guard, secretly recruiting a gunner force that destroyed the Janissaries during one of their many revolts. Support from Muhammad Ali, pasha of Egypt (virtually independent for some time), turned the tide against Greece, until Britain, France, and Russia threatened to jointly attack Turkey if it did not sign a peace treaty with the Greeks.

    A short naval battle persuaded the Ottomans of their sincerity by destroying the Turkish fleet. Greece was finally free. Chapt. 59: War Galore: The Balkans 1825-1878 (pp. 389-395) Following the revolt of Greece the Ottoman empire plunged into a series of wars:

    Russo-Turkish War (1828-29) Crimean War (1853-56) Russo-Turkish War (1877-78) Balkan Wars (1912-13) World War I (1914-18)

    Russia was Turkey's greatest enemy, and the Balkan states generally gained their independence because of their relationship with Russia. This growing power intimidated Britain and France enough to join the Ottomans against Russia in the Crimea.

    The wars were conceived almost exclusively as political struggles by the "Christian" nations, but the rhetoric of jihad still dominated Ottoman propaganda until the mid-19th century.

    In the face of revolts in Egypt, Bosnia, Herzegovina, and Bulgaria, and the Russian advance to Edirne (~50 miles from Istanbul), belated military reforms and savage reprisals against rebels could not keep the empire together.

    In India, 1877, a gathering of Muslim clerics decided that for their part, jihad against Britain was unnecessary, as long as she permitted the practice of Islam to her subjects.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Part Eleven: The Jihad Returns Chapt. 60: The Great Unholy Wars: Dar al-Harb 1912-1945 (pp. 399-409) The new Balkan states created in the first few decades of the 20th century had no experience at self-government. Their only model of government for the last few centuries had been Ottoman corruption and ruthlessness.

    The new borders were not drawn with intelligible divisions of ethnicity or language. 1912 - 1st Balkan war - Greece, Serbia, Bulgaria, Albania, Turkey - lots of switching sides.

    Austria got involved when Serbia claimed Bosnia, and the death of Archduke Francis Ferdinand triggered the 1st World War. Turkey entered on the side of Germany and the sultan/caliph declared universal jihad against the enemy nations.

    But in general the call failed and few Muslims in these countries rebelled. The British persuaded the Arabs in turn to declare a jihad against the Ottomans. Various rival factions declaring jihad on one another further weakened the empire.

    1915-massacre of 1 million Armenians while being deported from Turkey to Syria. Most of the victims died along the way when deprived of food, water and all clothing. e.g. In one group of 18,000 Armenians, only 150 survived to reach Aleppo.

    1922-100,000 Greeks massacred at Smyrna All the victims in both cases were Christian. With the destruction of the Ottoman empire, after the last orgy of violence in Smyrna, the caliphate and the rhetoric of jihad temporarily disappeared. In fact, the new leader of Turkey, Mustafa Kemal (Attaturk) detested Islam. But during W.W.II the first hints of the return of jihad appeared in Bosnia, unrecognised by almost everybody.

    In the midst of inter-ethnic violence where everybody appeared to be killing everyone else, Muslims began banding together, forming religiously defined defence groups. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem travelled to Yugoslavia to preach jihad against the Jews and other enemies of Islam on the side of Nazi Germany.

    Chapt. 61: Terrorism: The West 1980s-1990s (pp. 410-412) The vocabulary of jihad has returned, justifying terrorist actions of every type. But rather than uniting Islam, jihad today is dividing it as Muslims war against one another. Not all Muslims identify with this violence. Islam is still a political ideology, considering its destiny to rule the world and replace the outdated religions of Christianity and Judaism. Religious submission is demanded of its own people.

    Epilogue: An Action in all its Luster (pp. 413-415) Story about a good relationship between a Christian and a Muslim in the 18th century.

    Conclusion: What, therefore can we say concerning the Qur'an? Is it the Word of God? Muslims contend that we can only understand the origins of the Qur'an through the eyes of Muslim Tradition, which tells us that Allah revealed his truth through the Qur'an which was sent down to Muhammad.

    We, however, suspect the authenticity for this claim, as the primary sources for the later traditions simply do not exist prior to the eighth century. In fact the Muslim sources which we do possess are of a relatively later date, compiled between 200-300 years after the fact, and are dependant on oral traditions passed down by storytellers whose narratives not only cannot be corroborated, but suddenly seem to proliferate towards the end of the eighth century.

    Wansbrough takes the position that the Qur'an was compiled even later than the traditions, and was used as an authoritative stamp to authenticate later beliefs and laws by those who were responsible for canonizing the Muslim Traditions. If he is correct, then one would wonder whether Muhammad would even recognize the Qur'an which we possess today.

    Nonetheless, the Qur'an itself has been suggested as a source for Islam, and its own best authority. Yet it too suffers from many of the same problems mentioned above.

    When we open the Qur'an and read it we are faced immediately with many structural and literary difficulties which bode ill for a document claiming to be the final and perfect Word of God. We are presented with spurious "Biblical accounts" which parallel known second century heretical Talmudic and Christian Apocryphal documents.

    And while we wonder how these very human documents found their way into a supposedly non-human scripture, we are introduced to scientific peculiarities which have also found their way into its pages.

    These difficulties do seem to point away from a divine authorship and point towards a more plausible explanation; that the Qur'an is simply a collection of disparate sources borrowed from surrounding pieces of literature, folk tales, and oral traditions present during the seventh and eighth centuries, and accidently grafted in by unsuspecting later compilers of the Abbasid period.

    Non-Muslim sources which we possess from a variety of surrounding societies also corroborate the evidence above. Much of what we find in these external seventh and eighth century sources contradict what the Muslim Tradition and the Qur'an tell us, causing us to suspect the latter's authenticity.

    In the end we are left with little on which to hold. Muslim sources are found to be questionable, while non-Muslim sources point to a dearth of any real evidence for the accurateness of the Qur'an.

    There is indeed, much disturbing material here with which the Muslim apologist must now contend. Yet, I do find solace in the fact that the next time I see a Muslim holding his Qur'an aloft as evidence of Allah's blueprint for humanity, I can ask him one simple question, the same question historians are now asking, "Where, indeed is the evidence for that which they believe?"

    Here you will find the evidence for which I know and beleive. Just below in Ezekiel Chapter 38 you will find the end result of what will happen to the "enemies of the USA and Israel. Also read Eze. Ch. 39-40, Revelation Ch. 16, Daniel Ch. 12, Mark Ch. 13 re: the parable of the fig-tree and the generation that began in 1948. Read and understand just these chapters in the Bible and their references and then you will have peace of mind. You will also know why we must be held captive for just a short time. Then Rev. Ch. 9, The time of the locus, as any farmer knows is five months. The reign of the antichrist, (Satan, the false christ that comes first.) He will soon come in giving peace and prosperity to the world. Looking like Christ and a great leader. Yes, he will rule from the temple in Israel. Watch the News my friends, don't be deceived!

    This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Osama Bin Laden in a court of law. Intelligence often cannot be used evidentially, due both to the strict rules of admissibility and to the need to protect the safety of sources. But on the basis of all the information available HMG is confident of its conclusions as expressed in this document.

    RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE TERRORIST ATROCITIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 AN UPDATED ACCOUNT

    INTRODUCTION

    1. The clear conclusions reached by the government are

     Osama bin Laden and Al Qaida, the terrorist network which he heads, planned and carried out the atrocities on 11 September 2001;

     Osama bin Laden and Al Qaida retain the will and resources to carry out further atrocities;

     the United Kingdom, and United Kingdom nationals are potential targets; and

     Osama bin Laden and Al Qaida were able to commit these atrocities because of their close alliance with the Taliban régime, which allowed them to operate with impunity in pursuing their terrorist activity.

    2. The material in respect of 1998 and the USS Cole comes from indictments and intelligence sources. The material in respect of 11 September comes from intelligence and the criminal investigation to date. The details of some aspects cannot be given, but the facts are clear from the intelligence.

    3. The document does not contain the totality of the material known to HMG, given the continuing and absolute need to protect intelligence sources.

    SUMMARY

    4. The relevant facts show:

    Background

     Al Qaida is a terrorist organisation with ties to a global network, which has been in existence for over 10 years. It was founded, and has been led at all times, by Osama bin Laden.

     Osama bin Laden and Al Qaida have been engaged in a jihad against the United States, and its allies. One of their stated aims is the murder of US citizens, and attacks on America’s allies.

     Osama bin Laden and Al Qaida have been based in Afghanistan since 1996, but have a network of operations throughout the world. The network includes training camps, warehouses, communication facilities and commercial operations able to raise significant sums of money to support its activity. That activity includes substantial exploitation of the illegal drugs trade from Afghanistan.

     Osama bin Laden’s Al Qaida and the Taliban régime have a close and mutually dependent alliance. Osama bin Laden and Al Qaida provide the Taliban régime with material, financial and military support. They jointly exploit the drugs trade. The Taliban régime allows Bin Laden to operate his terrorist training camps and activities from Afghanistan, protects him from attacks from outside, and protects the drugs stockpiles. Osama Bin Laden could not operate his terrorist activities without the alliance and support of the Taliban régime. The Taliban’s strength would be seriously weakened without Osama bin Laden’s military and financial support.

     Osama bin Laden and Al Qaida have the capability to execute major terrorist attacks.

     Osama bin Laden has claimed credit for the attack on US soldiers in Somalia in October 1993, which killed 18; for the attack on the US Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in August 1998 which killed 224 and injured nearly 5000; and was linked to the attack on the USS Cole on 12 October 2000, in which 17 crew members were killed and 40 others injured.

     They have sought to acquire nuclear and chemical materials for use as terrorist weapons.

    In relation to the terrorist attacks on 11 September 5. After 11 September we learned that, not long before, Bin Laden had indicated he was about to launch a major attack on America. The detailed planning for the terrorist attacks of 11 September was carried out by one of UBL’s close associates. Of the 19 hijackers involved in 11 September 2001, it has been established that the majority had links with Al Qaida. A senior Bin Laden associate claimed to have trained some of the hijackers in Afghanistan. The attacks on 11 September 2001 were similar in both their ambition and intended impact to previous attacks undertaken by Osama bin laden and Al Qaida, and also had features in common. In particular:

     suicide attackers

     co-ordinated attacks on the same day

     the aim to cause maximum American casualties

     total disregard for other casualties, including Muslim

     meticulous long-term planning

     absence of warning

    6. Al Qaida retains the capability and the will to make further attacks on the US and its allies, including the United Kingdom.

    7. Al Qaida gives no warning of terrorist attack.

    THE FACTS

    Osama bin Laden and Al Qaida

    8. In 1989 Osama bin Laden, and others, founded an international terrorist group known as “Al Qaida” (the Base). At all times he has been the leader of Al Qaida.

    9. From 1989 until 1991 Osama bin Laden was based in Afghanistan and Peshawar, Pakistan. In 1991 he moved to Sudan, where he stayed until 1996. In that year he returned to Afghanistan, where he remains.

    The Taliban Régime

    10. The Taliban emerged from the Afghan refugee camps in Pakistan in the early 1990s. By 1996 they had captured Kabul. They are still engaged in a bloody civil war to control the whole of Afghanistan. They are led by Mullah Omar.

    11. In 1996 Osama bin Laden moved back to Afghanistan. He established a close relationship with Mullah Omar, and threw his support behind the Taliban. Osama bin Laden and the Taliban régime have a close alliance on which both depend for their continued existence. They also share the same religious values and vision.

    12. Osama bin Laden has provided the Taliban régime with troops, arms and money to fight the Northern Alliance. He is closely involved with Taliban military training, planning and operations. He has representatives in the Taliban military command structure. He has also given infrastruture assistance and humanitarian aid. Forces under the control of Osama bin Laden have fought alongside the Taliban in the civil war in Afghanistan.

    13. Omar has provided Bin Laden with a safe haven in which to operate, and has allowed him to establish terrorist training camps in Afghanistan. They jointly exploit the Afghan drugs trade. In return for active Al Qaida support, the Taliban allow Al Qaida to operate freely, including planning, training and preparing for terrorist activity. In addition the Taliban provide security for the stockpiles of drugs.

    14. Since 1996, when the Taliban captured Kabul, the United States government has consistently raised with them a whole range of issues, including humanitarian aid and terrorism. Well before 11 September 2001 they had provided evidence to the Taliban of the responsibility of Al Qaida for the terrorist attacks in East Africa. This evidence had been provided to senior leaders of the Taliban at their request.

    15. The United States government had made it clear to the Taliban régime that Al Qaida had murdered US citizens, and planned to murder more. The US offered to work with the Taliban to expel the terrorists from Afghanistan. These talks, which have been continuing since 1996, have failed to produce any results.

    16. In June 2001, in the face of mounting evidence of the Al Qaida threat, the United States warned the Taliban that it had the right to defend itself and that it would hold the régime responsible for attacks against US citizens by terrorists sheltered in Afghanistan.

    17. In this, the United States had the support of the United Nations. The Security Council, in Resolution 1267, condemned Osama Bin Laden for sponsoring international terrorism and operating a network of terrorist camps, and demanded that the Taliban surrender Osama bin Laden without further delay so that he could be brought to justice.

    18. Despite the evidence provided by the US of the responsibility of Osama bin Laden and Al Qaida for the 1998 East Africa bombings, despite the accurately perceived threats of further atrocities, and despite the demands of the United Nations, the Taliban régime responded by saying no evidence existed against Osama bin Laden, and that neither he nor his network would be expelled.

    19. A former Government official in Afghanistan has described the Taliban and Osama bin Laden as “two sides of the same coin: Osama cannot exist in Afghanistan without the Taliban and the Taliban cannot exist without Osama”.

    Al Qaida

    20. Al Qaida is dedicated to opposing ‘un-Islamic’ governments in Muslim countries with force and violence.

    21. Al Qaida virulently opposes the United States. Osama Bin Laden has urged and incited his followers to kill American citizens, in the most unequivocal terms.

    22. On 12 October 1996 he issued a declaration of jihad as follows:

    “The people of Islam have suffered from aggression, iniquity and injustice imposed by the Zionist-Crusader alliance and their collaborators . . .

    It is the duty now on every tribe in the Arabian peninsula to fight jihad and cleanse the land from these Crusader occupiers. Their wealth is booty to those who kill them.

    My Muslim brothers: your brothers in Palestine and in the land of the two Holy Places [Saudi Arabia] are calling upon your help and asking you to take part in fighting against the enemy – the Americans and the Israelis. They are asking you to do whatever you can to expel the enemies out of the sanctities of Islam.”

    Later in the same year he said that:

    “terrorising the American occupiers [of Islamic Holy Places] is a religious and logical obligation”.

    In February 1998 he issued and signed a ‘fatwa’ which included a decree to all Muslims:

    “... the killing of Americans and their civilian and military allies is a religious duty for each and every Muslim to be carried out in whichever country they are until Al Aqsa mosque has been liberated from their grasp and until their armies have left Muslim lands.”

    In the same ‘fatwa’ he called on Muslim scholars and their leaders and their youths to:

    “launch an attack on the American soldiers of Satan”

    and concluded:

    “We – with God’s help – call on every Muslim who believes in God and wishes to be rewarded to comply with God’s order to kill Americans and plunder their money whenever and wherever they find it. We also call on Muslims . . . to launch the raid on Satan’s US troops and the devil’s supporters allying with them, and to displace those who are behind them.”

    When asked, in 1998, about obtaining chemical or nuclear weapons he said “acquiring such weapons for the defence of Muslims [is] a religious duty”, and made the following claim in an interview printed in the Pakistan newspaper Dawn in November 2001:

    “I wish to declare that if America used chemical or nuclear weapons against us, then we may retort with chemical and nuclear weapons. We have the weapons as deterrent.”

    In an interview aired on Al Jazira (Doha, Qatar) television he stated:

    “Our enemy is every American male, whether he is directly fighting us or paying taxes.”

    In two interviews broadcast on US television in 1997 and 1998 he referred to the terrorists who carried out the earlier attack on the World Trade Center in 1993 as “role models”. He went on to exhort his followers “to take the fighting to America”.

    23. From the early 1990s Osama bin Laden has sought to obtain nuclear and chemical materials for use as weapons of terror.

    24. Although US targets are Al Qaida’s priority, it also explicitly threatens the United States’ allies. References to “Zionist-Crusader alliance and their collaborators”, and to “Satan’s US troops and the devil’s supporters allying with them” are references which unquestionably include the United Kingdom. This is confirmed by more specific references in a broadcast of 13 October, during which Bin Laden’s spokesman said:

    “Al Qaida declares that Bush Sr, Bush Jr, Clinton, Blair and Sharon are the arch-criminals from among the Zionists and Crusaders … Al Qaida stresses that the blood of those killed will not go to waste, God willing, until we punish these criminals … We also say and advise the Muslims in the United States and Britain …. not to travel by plane. We also advise them not to live in high-rise buildings and towers.”

    25. There is a continuing threat. Based on our experience of the way the network has operated in the past, other cells, like those that carried out the terrorist attacks on 11 September, must be assumed to exist.

    26. Al Qaida functions both on its own and through a network of other terrorist organisations. These include Egyptian Islamic Jihad and other north African Islamic extremist terrorist groups, and a number of other jihadi groups in other countries including the Sudan, Yemen, Somalia, Pakistan and India. Al Qaida also maintains cells and personnel in a number of other countries to facilitate its activities.

    27. Osama bin Laden heads the Al Qaida network. Below him is a body known as the Shura, which includes representatives of other terrorist groups, such as Egyptian Islamic Jihad leader Ayman Zawahiri and prominent lieutenants of Bin Laden such as Mohamed Atef (also known as Abu Hafs Al-Masri). Egyptian Islamic Jihad has, in effect, merged with Al Qaida.

    28. In addition to the Shura, Al Qaida has several groups dealing with military, media, financial and Islamic issues.

    29. Mohamed Atef is a member of the group that deals with military and terrorist operations. His duties include principal responsibility for training Al Qaida members.

    30. Members of Al Qaida must make a pledge of allegiance to follow the orders of Osama bin Laden.

    31. A great deal of evidence about Osama bin Laden and Al Qaida has been made available in the US indictment for earlier crimes.

    32. Since 1989, Osama bin Laden has conducted substantial financial and business transactions on behalf of Al Qaida and in pursuit of its goals. These include purchasing land for training camps, purchasing warehouses for the storage of items, including explosives, purchasing communications and electronics equipment, and transporting currency and weapons to members of Al Qaida and associated terrorist groups in countries throughout the world.

    33. Since 1989 Osama bin Laden has provided training camps and guest houses in Afghanistan, Pakistan, the Sudan, Somalia and Kenya for the use of Al Qaida and associated terrorist groups. We know from intelligence that there are currently at least a dozen camps across Afghanistan, of which at least four are used for training terrorists.

    34. Since 1989, Osama bin Laden has established a series of businesses to provide income for Al Qaida, and to provide cover for the procurement of explosives, weapons and chemicals, and for the travel of Al Qaida operatives. The businesses have included a holding company known as ‘Wadi Al Aqiq’, a construction business known as ‘Al Hijra’, an agricultural business known as ‘Al Themar Al Mubaraka’, and investment companies known as ‘Ladin International’ and ‘Taba Investments’.

    Osama bin Laden and previous attacks

    35. In 1992 and 1993 Mohamed Atef travelled to Somalia on several occasions for the purpose of organising violence against United States and United Nations troops then stationed in Somalia. On each occasion he reported back to Osama bin Laden, at his base in the Riyadh district of Khartoum.

    36. In the spring of 1993 Atef, Saif al Adel, another senior member of Al Qaida, and other members began to provide military training to Somali tribes for the purpose of fighting the United Nations forces.

    37. On 3 and 4 October 1993 operatives of Al Qaida participated in the attack on US military personnel serving in Somalia as part of the operation ‘Restore Hope.’ Eighteen US military personnel were killed in the attack.

    38. From 1993 members of Al Qaida began to live in Nairobi and set up businesses there, including Asma Ltd, and Tanzanite King. They were regularly visited there by senior members of Al Qaida, in particular by Atef and Abu Ubadiah al Banshiri.

    39. Beginning in the latter part of 1993, members of Al Qaida in Kenya began to discuss the possibility of attacking the US Embassy in Nairobi in retaliation for US participation in Operation Restore Hope in Somalia. Ali Mohamed, a US citizen and admitted member of Al Qaida, surveyed the US Embassy as a possible target for a terrorist attack. He took photographs and made sketches, which he presented to Osama bin Laden while Bin Laden was in Sudan. He also admitted that he had trained terrorists for Al Qaida in Afghanistan in the early 1990s, and that those whom he trained included many involved in the East African bombings in August 1998.

    40. In June or July 1998, two Al Qaida operatives, Fahid Mohammed Ali Msalam and Sheik Ahmed Salim Swedan, purchased a Toyota truck and made various alterations to the back of the truck.

    41. In early August 1998, operatives of Al Qaeda gathered in 43, New Runda Estates, Nairobi to execute the bombing of the US Embassy in Nairobi.

    42. On 7 August 1998, Assam, a Saudi national and Al Qaida operative, drove the Toyota truck to the US Embassy. There was a large bomb in the back of the truck.

    43. Also in the truck was Mohamed Rashed Daoud Al ‘Owali, another Saudi. He, by his own confession, was an Al Qaida operative, who from about 1996 had been trained in Al Qaida camps in Afghanistan in explosives, hijacking, kidnapping, assassination and intelligence techniques. With Osama bin Laden’s express permission, he fought alongside the Taliban in Afghanistan. He had met Osama bin Laden personally in 1996 and asked for another ‘mission.’ Osama bin Laden sent him to East Africa after extensive specialised training at camps in Afghanistan.

    44. As the truck approached the Embassy, Al ’Owali got out and threw a stun grenade at a security guard. Assam drove the truck up to the rear of the Embassy. He got out and then detonated the bomb, which demolished a multi-storey secretarial college and severely damaged the US Embassy, and the Co-operative bank building. The bomb killed 213 people and injured 4500. Assam was killed in the explosion.

    45. Al ‘Owali expected the mission to end in his death. He had been willing to die for Al Qaeda. But at the last minute he ran away from the bomb truck and survived. He had no money, passport or plan to escape after the mission, because he had expected to die.

    46. After a few days, he called a telephone number in Yemen to have money transferred to him in Kenya. The number he rang in Yemen was contacted by Osama bin Laden’s phone on the same day as Al ‘Owali was arranging to get the money.

    47. Another person arrested in connection with the Nairobi bombing was Mohamed Sadeek Odeh. He admitted to his involvement. He identified the principal participants in the bombing. He named three other persons, all of whom were Al Qaida or Egyptian Islamic Jihad members.

    48. In Dar es Salaam the same day, at about the same time, operatives of Al Qaeda detonated a bomb at the US Embassy, killing 11 people. The Al Qaeda operatives involved included Mustafa Mohamed Fadhil and Khaflan Khamis Mohamed. The bomb was carried in a Nissan Atlas truck, which Ahmed Khfaklan Ghailani and Sheikh Ahmed Salim Swedan, two Al Qaeda operatives, had purchased in July 1998, in Dar es Salaam.

    49. Khaflan Khamis Mohamed was arrested for the bombing. He admitted membership of Al Qaeda, and implicated other members of Al Qaeda in the bombing.

    50. On 7 and 8 August 1998, two other members of Al Qaida disseminated claims of responsibility for the two bombings by sending faxes to media organisations in Paris, Doha in Qatar, and Dubai in the United Arab Emirates.

    51. Additional evidence of the involvement of Al Qaida in the East African bombings came from a search conducted in London of several residences and businesses belonging to Al Qaida and Egyptian Islamic Jihad members. In those searches a number of documents were found including claims of responsibility for the East African bombings in the name of a fictitious group, ‘the Islamic Army for the liberation of the Holy Places’.

    52. Al ‘Owali, the would-be suicide bomber, admitted he was told to make a videotape of himself using the name of the same fictitious group.

    53. The faxed claims of responsibility were traced to a telephone number, which had been in contact with Osama bin Laden’s cell phone. The claims disseminated to the press were clearly written by someone familiar with the conspiracy. They stated that the bombings had been carried out by two Saudis in Kenya, and one Egyptian in Dar es Salaam. They were probably sent before the bombings had even taken place. They referred to two Saudis dying in the Nairobi attack. In fact, because Al ‘Owali fled at the last minute, only one Saudi died.

    54. On 22 December 1998 Osama bin Laden was asked by Time magazine whether he was responsible for the August 1998 attacks. He replied:

    “The International Islamic Jihad Front for the jihad against the US and Israel has, by the grace of God, issued a crystal clear fatwa calling on the Islamic nation to carry on Jihad aimed at liberating the holy sites. The nation of Mohammed has responded to this appeal. If instigation for jihad against the Jews and the Americans . . . is considered to be a crime, then let history be a witness that I am a criminal. Our job is to instigate and, by the grace of God, we did that, and certain people responded to this instigation.”

    He was asked if he knew the attackers:

    “... those who risked their lives to earn the pleasure of God are real men. They managed to rid the Islamic nation of disgrace. We hold them in the highest esteem.”

    And what the US could expect of him:

    “... any thief or criminal who enters another country to steal should expect to be exposed to murder at any time… The US knows that I have attacked it, by the grace of God, for more than ten years now… God knows that we have been pleased by the killing of American soldiers [in Somalia in 1993]. This was achieved by the grace of God and the efforts of the mujahideen… Hostility towards America is a religious duty and we hope to be rewarded for it by God. I am confident that Muslims will be able to end the legend of the so-called superpower that is America.”

    55. In December 1999 a terrorist cell linked to Al Qaeda was discovered trying to carry out attacks inside the United States. An Algerian, Ahmed Ressam, was stopped at the US-Canadian border, and over 100 lbs of bomb-making material was found in his car. Ressam admitted he was planning to set off a large bomb at Los Angeles International airport on New Year’s Day. He said that he had received terrorist training at Al Qaida camps in Afghanistan and then been instructed to go abroad and kill US civilians and military personnel.

    56. On 3 January 2000, a group of Al Qaida members, and other terrorists who had trained in Al Qaeda camps in Afghanistan, attempted to attack a US destroyer with a small boat loaded with explosives. Their boat sank, aborting the attack.

    57. On 12 October 2000, however, the USS Cole was struck by an explosive-laden boat while refuelling in Aden harbour. Seventeen crew were killed, and 40 injured.

    58. Several of the perpetrators of the Cole attack (mostly Yemenis and Saudis) were trained at Osama bin Laden’s camps in Afghanistan. Al ‘Owali has identified the two commanders of the attack on the USS Cole as having participated in the planning and preparation for the East African Embassy bombings.

    59. In the months before the September 11 attacks, propaganda videos were distributed throughout the Middle East and Muslim world by Al Qaida, in which Osama bin Laden and others were shown encouraging Muslims to attack American and Jewish targets.

    60. Similar videos, extolling violence against the United States and other targets, were distributed before the East African Embassy attacks in August 1998.

    Osama bin Laden and the 11 September attacks

    61. Nineteen men have been identified as the hijackers from the passenger lists of the four planes hijacked on 11 September 2001. Many of them had previous links with Al Qaeda or have so far been positively identified as associates of Al Qaida. An associate of some of the hijackers has been identified as playing key roles in both the East African Embassy attacks and the USS Cole attack. Investigations continue into the backgrounds of all the hijackers.

    62. From intelligence sources, the following facts have been established subsequent to 11 September; for intelligence reasons, the names of associates, though known, are not given.

     In the run-up to 11 September, Bin Laden was mounting a concerted propaganda campaign amongst like-minded groups of people – including videos and documentation – justifying attacks on Jewish and American targets; and claiming that those who died in the course of them were carrying out God’s work.

     We have learned, subsequent to 11 September, that Bin Laden himself asserted shortly before 11 September that he was preparing a major attack on America.

     In August and early September close associates of Bin Laden were warned to return to Afghanistan from other parts of the world by 10 September.

     Immediately prior to 11 September some known associates of Bin Laden were naming the date for action as on or around 11 September.

     A senior associate claimed to have trained some of the hijackers in Afghanistan.

     Since 11 September we have learned that one of Bin Laden’s closest and most senior associates was responsible for the detailed planning of the attacks.

     There is evidence of a very specific nature relating to the guilt of Bin Laden and his associates that is too sensitive to release.

    63. In addition, Osama bin Laden has issued a number of public statements since the US strikes on Afghanistan began. The language used in these, while not an open admission of guilt, is self-incriminating.

    64. For example, on 7 October he said:

    “Here is America struck by God Almighty in one of its vital organs, so that its greatest buildings are destroyed. Grace and gratitude to God … I swear to God that America will not live in peace before peace reigns in Palestine, and before all the army of infidels depart the land of Mohammed, peace by upon him.”

    65. On 9 October his spokesman praised the “good deed” of the hijackers, who “transferred the battle into the US heartland”. He warned that the “storm of plane attacks will not abate”.

    66. On 20 October Bin Laden gave an inflammatory interview which has been circulating, in the form of a video, among supporters in the Al Qaida network. In the transcript, when referring to the US buildings that were attacked, he says:

    “It is what we instigated for a while, in self-defence. And it was in revenge for our people killed in Palestine and Iraq. So if avenging the killing of our people is terrorism, let history be a witness that we are terrorists.”

    Later in the interview he said:

    “Bush and Blair…. don’t understand any language but the language of force. Every time they kill us, we will kill them, so the balance of terror can be achieved.”

    He went on:

    “The battle has been moved inside America, and we shall continue until we win this battle, or die in the cause and meet our maker.”

    He also said:

    “The bad terror is what America and Israel are practising against our people, and what we are practising is the good terror that will stop them doing what they are doing.”

    67. Osama bin Laden remains in charge, and the mastermind, of Al Qaida. In Al Qaeda, an operation on the scale of the 11 September attacks would have been approved by Osama bin Laden himself.

    68. The modus operandi of 11 September was entirely consistent with previous attacks. Al Qaeda’s record of atrocities is characterised by meticulous long-term planning, a desire to inflict mass casualties, suicide bombers, and multiple simultaneous attacks.

    69. The attacks of 11 September 2001 are entirely consistent with the scale and sophistication of the planning which went into the attacks on the East African Embassies and the USS Cole. No warnings were given for these three attacks, just as there was none on 11 September.

    70. Al Qaida operatives, in evidence given in the East African Embassy bomb trials, have described how the group spends years preparing for an attack. They conduct repeated surveillance, patiently gather materials, and identify and vet operatives, who have the skills to participate in the attack and the willingness to die for their cause.

    71. The operatives involved in the 11 September atrocities attended flight schools, used flight simulators to study the controls of larger aircraft and placed potential airports and routes under surveillance.

    72. Al Qaeda’s attacks are characterised by total disregard for innocent lives, including Muslims. In an interview after the East African bombings, Osama bin Laden insisted that the need to attack the United States excused the killing of other innocent civilians, Muslim and non-Muslim alike.

    73. No other organisation has both the motivation and the capability to carry out attacks like those of the 11 September – only the Al Qaida network under Osama bin Laden.

    Conclusion

    74. The attacks of the 11 September 2001 were planned and carried out by Al Qaida, an organisation whose head is Osama bin Laden. That organisation has the will, and the resources, to execute further attacks of similar scale. Both the United States and its close allies are targets for such attacks. The attack could not have occurred without the alliance between the Taliban and Osama bin Laden, which allowed Bin Laden to operate freely in Afghanistan, promoting, planning and executing terrorist activity.

    The KJV Strong's Version

    For your benefit, I put in parentaces and bold the translation from Hebrew to English taken from the Strongs Hebrew, Greek and Chaldean Dictionary.

    Study and show thyself approved of the Lord and just maybe you will be spared! And YES, I know tomorrow as you know yesterday. You who understand, know who and what I am! Don, His End Time Watchmen

    Ezekiel 38

    38:1 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,

    38:2 Son of man, set thy face against Gog, the land of Magog, (Russia) the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal, and prophesy against him,

    38:3 And say, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against thee, O Gog, (Leader of Russia) the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal:

    38:4 And I will turn thee back, and put hooks into thy jaws, and I will bring thee forth, and all thine army, horses and horsemen, all of them clothed with all sorts of armour, even a great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling swords: (Great military, vehicles and modern weapons)

    38:5 Persia, (Iran & Iraq) (Ethiopia, African Nations) and (Libya) with them; all of them with shield and helmet:

    38:6 Gomer, and all his bands; ( Assyrian, Celts ) the house of Togarmah (Russian part of old Assyria) of the north quarters, and all his bands: and many people with thee.

    38:7 Be thou prepared, and prepare for thyself, thou, and all thy company (Military Allies) that are assembled unto thee, and be thou a guard unto them.

    38:8 After many days thou shalt be visited: in the latter years thou shalt come into the land that is brought back from the sword, and is gathered out of many people, against the mountains (people) of Israel, which have been always waste: but it is brought forth out of the nations, and they shall dwell safely all of them.

    38:9 Thou shalt ascend and come like a storm, thou shalt be like a cloud to cover the land, thou, and all thy bands, and many people with thee. (By air and land)

    38:10 Thus saith the Lord GOD; It shall also come to pass, that at the same time shall things come into thy mind, and thou shalt think an evil thought: (War and terrorism)

    38:11 And thou shalt say, I will go up to the land of unwalled villages; I will go to them that are at rest, that dwell safely, all of them dwelling without walls, (Outside Jerusalem) and having neither bars nor gates,

    38:12 To take a spoil, and to take a prey; to turn thine hand upon the desolate places that are now inhabited, and upon the people that are gathered out of the nations, which have gotten cattle and goods, that dwell in the midst of the land.

    38:13 Sheba, and Dedan, (Arabian States)and the merchants of Tarshish, (Spain)with all the young lions thereof, shall say unto thee, Art thou come to take a spoil? hast thou gathered thy company to take a prey? to carry away silver and gold, to take away cattle and goods, to take a great spoil?

    38:14 Therefore, son of man, prophesy and say unto Gog, Thus saith the Lord GOD; In that day when my people of Israel dwelleth safely, shalt thou not know it?

    38:15 And thou shalt come from thy place out of the north parts, thou, and many people with thee, all of them riding upon horses, a great company, and a mighty army:

    38:16 And thou shalt come up against my people of Israel, as a cloud to cover the land; it shall be in the latter days, and I will bring thee against my land, that the heathen may know me, when I shall be sanctified in thee, O Gog, before their eyes.

    38:17 Thus saith the Lord GOD; Art thou he of whom I have spoken in old time by my servants the prophets of Israel, which prophesied in those days many years that I would bring thee against them?

    38:18 And it shall come to pass at the same time when Gog shall come against the land of Israel, saith the Lord GOD, that my fury shall come up in my face.

    38:19 For in my jealousy and in the fire of my wrath have I spoken, Surely in that day there shall be a great shaking in the land of Israel;(Bombs)

    38:20 So that the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the heaven, and the beasts of the field, and all creeping things that creep upon the earth, and all the men that are upon the face of the earth, shall shake at my presence, and the mountains (World Governments)shall be thrown down, and the steep places (Communications and weapon Satellites) shall fall, and every wall shall fall to the ground.

    38:21 And I will call for a sword (Judgement)against him throughout all my mountains, (US Government, Canada, England and Christian Nations) saith the Lord GOD: every man's sword (Weapons)shall be against his brother. (Different ethinic races in USA, not family!)

    38:22 And I will plead against him with pestilence and with blood; and I will rain upon him, and upon his bands, and upon the many people that are with him, an overflowing rain, and great hailstones, fire, and brimstone.(Radiation and Biological weapons)

    38:23 Thus will I magnify myself, and sanctify myself; and I will be known in the eyes of many nations, and they shall know that I am the LORD. The KJV Strong's Version

    Our Father was the same in the beginning as He is today and forever.

    He never changes. His plan for us had different dispensations such as the time prior to, and after, sending Christ to this earth, but His divine plan for us did not change, nor did the rules. Man has always wanted a king, or someone in power that they could see. God allowed them Saul, and others, but as we see through history man is not capable of governing his people fairly. Then God sent Jesus Christ, our Saviour, Who is our King and will reign forever over us after this earth age. He came in the flesh and man had someone he could see and touch. Since the crucifixion man has had access to our Father, through Yahshua. Our Father didn'l change, but allowed us the proof of His grace through the precious blood of our Saviour. Anyone who chooses not to approach God through His Son Jesus, may not come to Him.

    My point is that God put many things in motion thousands of years before our Saviour came to this earth and as Christ said, He didn'l change one pur- pose or plan of His Father. He in fact fulfilled what God promised and reinforced the rest of His Father's prophecy and plan. (He removed the need for animal sacrifice, but this also was a fulfillment of prophecy).

    I want to discuss why God scattered His children through the generations. It could have been because He was so angry with them for worshipping every- thing but their own Father. Or like the time He scattered them for their own protection allowing them to be taken captive by a bigger prosperous nation. Each time they emerged from captivity far richer and larger than they were before.

    What about the majority of the ten tribes during the Assyrian captivity? Some will say the majority were never heard from again. It just depends on whether you know who you arc looking for or not. There is overwhelming historical proof (not to mention the fulfillment cf God's prophecy) that those tribes migrated over the Caucasus Mountains, later being called Caucasians. They went through Spain and into Eastern Europe settling later into America. Frankly, this is why I bring to you the documentaries we work so hard on. If you look for the footprints, you find that they were there all the time. That's why it's really no mystery to see a stone found just north of the Rio Grande, with the complete ten command- ments on it in ancient Hebrew.

    Is it a mystery that God's hand moved them into the blessing that He promised their father, Jacob? God told Rebecca before their birth that she bore two nations of which the elder would serve the younger. Are they two little countries that fight over a piecs of land? Hardly! It's easy enough to see the blessing this great nation has re- ceived as opposed to another great nation that must be fed (again and again) by grain from America else it would starve.

    God scatters His people for their protection and as seed, to take root and spread His Word. When they formed the government of this country it caused the greatest Christian nation of all time to be formed. If you don't believe it just read our Constitution or check the coins in your pocket and see if they still say "In God we trust." As the leaven (yeast) spreads throughout many loaves, so does one of God's seeds bring about growth wher- ever it is planted. This ministry alone, from one little spot, is able to spread across and teach all of this hemisphere at one time.

    Let's go back in history and try to understand God's feelings when He scattered Israel after bring- ing them out of their Egyptian captivity. God was present with them in every possible way. He rolled back the waters of the Red Sea. He shone a pillar of light to lead their way. He dropped quail and manna from the sky to feed them. But, it wasn't enough because while God was giving Moses the law for these people to live by, they were busy worship- ping images created by their own hand. 1 think a king would have probably destroyed the whole bunch, but God has infinite mercy and His anger didn't bring about their destruction. Instead, He made a covenant (a promise) with His chi'drcn. Let's cover it in Deuteronomy.

    DEUTERONOMY 4:25 When thou shalt beget children, and children's children, and ye shall have remained long in the land, and shall corrupt yourselves, and make a graven image, or the likeness of any thing, and shal! do evil in the sight of the Lord thy God, to provoke Him to anger:

    As it was then, so it is again. A likeness of "any thing", whether it be wealth, power, a system, even a church, if it is aside from God and His Word. If you put something else before God, you anger Him. DEUTERONOMY 4:26 I call heaven and earth to witness against you this day, that ye shall soon utterly perish from off the land whereunto ye go over Jordan to possess it; ye shall not prolong your days upon it, but shall utterly be destroyed.

    God was furious with them and He made a promise to them or an agreement with them that He would destroy them (as a nation) if they again turned from Him to false gods.

    DEUTERONOMY 4:27-28 And the Lord shall scatter you among the nations, and ye shall be left few in number among the heathen, whither the Lord shall lead you."And there ye shall serve gods, the work of men' wood and stone, which neither see, nor hear, nor eat, s hands,nor smell.

    Intelligent people don't make things of wood and stone and then serve them do they? Well, what about a church that one builds and while attempting to teach God's Word from its pulpit it also teaches pagan worship?

    Do you observe "Easter" which comes directly from the worship of "Ishtar." Its traditions of Easter egg hunts and bunny rabbits come to us from the grove worshippers written of in the Bible. It's not hard to research and find out for yourself that the "egg rolling" was a fertility rite, or to put it in plain English, a great big sexual orgy they had in order to produce offspring calling on the help of the goddess Ishtar. Have you never heard the saying "quick like a bunny?"

    Are these little traditions of man cute? Is it any wonder what God thinks about it?

    Now what could be worse than allowing that heathenism into your place of worship? Well, how about if we take the gicat day of Passover, of which Christ became the ultimate Passover Lamb, the Sacrifice of all time. and tie the two observances together? Christians don't have any idea how much love their Father feels for them. Because, through His love comes the grace that we are given through Christ Jesus. Otherwise, I think God would make an end to it all.

    DEUTERONOMY 4:29 But if from thence thou shalt seek the Lord thy God, thou shall find Him, if thou seek Him with all thy heart and with all thy soul.

    Even after this insult God breaks His salvation down to each individual.

    DEUTERONOMY 4:30-31 When thou art in tribulation, and all these things are come upon thee, even in the latter days, if thou turn to the Lord thy God, and shalt be obedient unto His voice: "{For the Lord thy God is a merciful God; He will not forsake thee, neither de- stroy thee, nor forget the covenant of thy fathers which He sware unto them.)

    This covenant is from umbilical cord to umbilical cord. It is a contract that cannot be broken. He never said there wouldn't be tribulation, but He did. say 'hat if you seek after Him with all your heart He would always be there tor you. as an individual. What more could you ask for? He even sent His Son cis an emissary to further strengthen the bond for each individual's personal walk with Him. I want to turn to a little later in history when God spoke directly of His people settling a land that we know to be "America."

    ISAIAH 18:1 Woe to the land shadowing with wings, which is beyond the rivers of Ethiopia:

    Could this be "eagle's" wings? Or how about the land from which the very first airplane came.

    ISAIAH 18:2 That sendeth ambassadors by the sea even in vessels of bulrushes upon the waters, saying, 'Go, ye swift messengers, to a nation scattered and peeled, to a people terrible from their beginning hitherto; a nation meted out and trodden down, whose land the rivers have spoiled.

    You should do a study on the "scattered and peeled" people.

    ISAIAH 18:3 All ye inhabitants of the world, and dwellers on the earth, see ye, when He lifteth up an ensign on the mountains; and when He bloweth a trumpet, hear ye. I have seen an ensign lifted in power in this nation that blows the trumpet to most of the nations of the world.

    It is known as the United Nations.

    ISAIAH 18:4 For so the Lord said unto me, "I will take My rest, and I will consider in My dwelling place like a clear heat upon herbs, and like a cloud of dew in the heat of harvest.'

    As our Father rests before His harvest, He can send a wind (spirit) that can dry and burn on His children or a refreshing sustaining dew from the water of life to nurture and protect them. This is left completely up to the individual, you can make it hard, or you can make it easy. He has given you the authority and the power, through the name of Jesus Christ, to remove any obstacle from our path. As long as it is His path you walk on.

    ISAIAH 18:5-6 For afore the harvest, when the bud is perfect, and the sour grape is ripening in the flower, he shall both cut off the sprigs with pruning hooks, and take away and cut down the branches. "They shall be left to- gether unto the fowls of the mountains, and to the beasts of the earth: and the fowls shall summer upon them, and all the beasts of the earth shall winter upon them.

    A good pruning removes the dead branches, and all the sucker branches that pull nutrition from the fruit. It provides for a much better harvest.

    ISAIAH 18:7 In that time shall the present be brought unto the Lord of hosts of a people scattered and peeled, and from a people terrible from their beginning hitherto; a nation meted out and trodden under foot, whose land the rivers have spoiled, to the place of the name of the Lord of hosts, the mount Zion."

    Beloved, this study is to show you that in all things God has a purpose. It is no accident that this nation came to power with all His blessings as it has. It is no mystery that His children, that would be called by their new name "Christian," were dispersed here. It is no secret that Christ is returning as the King of kings and Lord of lords to claim through the coming harvest the fruit which is His.

    In Matthew, Chapter 12, Jesus is answering the Pharisees who have accused Him of casting out devils by the power of Satan. He tells them that if Satan cast out his own devils he would be dividing his kingdom and a divided kingdom will not stand. God's scatli ed people are not divided, they are His loved ones -that are planted exactly where He wants them. For Christ Himself said...

    MATTHEW 12:30 He that is not with Me is against Me: and he that gathereth not with Me scattereth abroad. You are either with Him or against Him. Wherever there are "fields sewn with seed" there is a harvest that will take place.

    When the trumpet sounds it calls out a people who are under the covenant God made with them. It's up to each and every individual. So, count your blessings and do your best because God is aware of each and every righteous act and He counts it worthy.

    In His Service, His End Time Watchmen

    Enter Here Listen to the Melody - Amazing Grace, which we all need plenty of today!
    While you listen to the music, take your Bible Or Enter Here and read "1rst Thesolonians Chapter 5" and you will understand where we are on God calender.

    Why Man's Self Rule Failed 2005 - 2012

    Fact from the end time watchman that the world don't want you to know!

    Electronic Mink Control - Psunami

    Low cost police -Do you know if you are being arrested by a man or humanoid robot look alike?

    Truth about Melchizedek and the God family

    Use water4gas and save the planet

    See Revelations 13 happening before your eyes with the G7 soon to become the 10 crowns of the dragon and how the UN plans for a earth's polulation of just two billion people.

    Today I am calling on 144,000 priest and kings-Septembe 28, the Lord's birthday!

    God's true Word Heard 24 hours a day around the World - Also access books and Bible study books and Disc on any subject in God's word you can think of Pastor Arnold Murray, DRE is one of God's end-time Profits

    As I mentioned below, meet our neighbors that live in the inner earth cities

    Search Engine Optimization - AddMe

    Enter Here Listen to the Melody - Amazing Grace, which we all need plenty of today!
    While you listen to the music, take your Bible Or Enter Here and read "1rst Thesolonians Chapter 5" and you will understand where we are on God's calender! Also access the entire Bible on line too! Or your Holy Qur'an

    Search the Bible:
    Search for:
    in:
    using:
    Include Study Tools HELP
    Copyright Crosswalk.com, Inc.

    Fed. ID # 93-6311525

    Dun & Brad ID # 11 836 6681

    Tel: 541-990-8133

    For all donations send payment by bank check, along with name and contack phone and Email if you have one to Heritage Works Trust - 67624 Spinreel Road #39 North Bend, Oregon 97459 USA

    Fed. ID # 93-6311525

    Dun & Brad ID # 11 836 6681

    Tel: 541-990-8133

    The numbers of those who want to know are growing by the day! Over 200,800 Million Hits from Jan. 2000 todate.
    Email: dhuard@lycos.com

    Brought to you and Sponsored by The son of man - Melchezedek;

    "As a whirlwind commeth out of the north, their you will find the son of man"

    Heritage Works Trust UBT

    67624 Spinreel Road #39

    North Bend, Oregon 97459

    Fed. ID # 93-6311525

    Dun & Brad ID # 11 836 6681

    Tel: 541-759-3280

    Email: dhuardx2@netzero.com

    Submit Your Site To The Web's Top 50 Search Engines for Free!