THE LIFE AND TIMES OF WINSTON CHURCHILL

                                             BY

                                 BRYAN THORPE             

               RIVERSDALE COMMUNITY COLLEGE

                                                    4B

 

Churchill, born at Blenheim Palace in Oxfordshrie.  On November 30, 1874. He was the child of a” prominent Tory politician”[1],  Lord Randolph Churhill and the american heiress Jennie Jerome. He was educated at Harrow school and then became a cadet at the Royal Military College, Sandhurst, passing out in February 1895 as a second lieutenant in the fourth Queen’s own Hussars. He served as a cavalry officer in India and the Sudan (where he rode in the cavalry charge at Omdurman in 1898 under the command of Horatio Herbert Kitchener), but resigned his commisson in 1899 to become a newspaper correspondent in the South African Wars (Boer Wars). A daring escape from prison after he had been

captured by the boers made him a national hero and in 1900 he was elected to parliament as Conservative member of parliament (mp) for Oldham. In 1904 he went over to the Liberal Party, having broken with the Conservatives on the issue of free trade. Having found a new Manchester seat to contest, he became President of the Board of Trade in the liberal “landslide” of 1906. In 1908 he became President of the Board of Trade in the Liberal cabinet of Herbert Henry Asquith, where he worked closely with the radical Chancellor of the Exchequer,

 

with the german onrush through neutral belgium in 1914, he led a naval detacthment to antwerp, but failed to stem the tide. In 1915 he made himself responsible for the campaign to force the dardanelles, with the aim of pushing turkey out of the war, or linking up with russia, and of taking the central powers in the rear. The campaign foundered, partly through bad lack of experience in combined

 

 

 

 

 

David Lloyd George, in promoting social reform. After a brief  period as Home Secratery (1910-1911), during which he persued the same polices, he became first Lord of the Admilitary (1911-1915). Before World War 1 he had insisted on maintaining the British navy’s superiority over that of its nearest rival, the German Navy, against the pressure of the cabinet ecomonizers like Lloyd George for reductions in the naval estimates.  

 

 

 

 

                   

Churchill’s role in world war 1 was controversial and almost destroyed his career. He was energetic first lord, but his sponsorship of the ill fated Gallipoli campaign And the subseqent failure of the Anglo-French fleets to force the Dardanelles striat led Asquith to demote him to the powerless office of Chancellor Of the Duchy of Lancaster in May 1915. deprived of  any influence on the war, He ,Resigned from his post in disgust in november. Following service as a batallion Commander on the western front, he was brought  back political life in 1917 by the new Prime Minister, Lloyd George ,who appionted him Minister of Munitions.after

The war he served in Lloyd George’s coalition cabinet from 1919 to 1922, as Secretary for War and air and as Colonial Secretary. The collapse of Lloyd george’s Government in september 1922, after a war scare over Turkey in which Churchill Played a typically bellicose role, left him out of office and out of  parliament He lost his seat at the subseqent general election and was not returned to parliament Until October 1924, as “constitutionalist” (conservative) mp for Epping. Much to his surprise the Conservative Prime Minister, Stanley Baldwin, offered him the post of Chancellor of the Exchequer, where he demonstrated his new Conservative credentials .By returning Britian to the gold standard and vigerously condemning the trade unions during the 1926 general strike.

 

From 1929, when Baldwin’s government fell, until 1939, Churchill found himself back in the political wilderness. His outspoken opposition to the indian nationalist Movement and his support for Edward VIII during the 1939 abdication crisis alienated Baldwin, who now regarded Churchill as a political liability, while his subsequent clamour for rearmament and his attacks on appeasement, particularly in 1938, earned him the implaceable hostility of Neville Chamberlain, who dominated the 1931-1940

National governments.

 

Six years later, Churchill towered above all contem poraries as a statesmen of international renown. He was known as the champion of freedom and civilisation, and the victorious leader of the british nation and empire at war. How did this transformation happen?

 

 

The change did not begin to happen until 1940, when the war was

Nine months old. Even his enemies had recognised that churchill

Would have to be brought into the government in the event of war –

His military expertise was universally acknowledged, and his criticisms of chamberlian’s policy of appeasement had after all proved jusified – and he had been made first lord of the admilitary. In his capacity he was given charge only of the royal navy, a position that, after ten years in the political wilderness, he was content to accept.

 

                   

When Chamberlain was forced to declare war on Germany in September 1939. He siad what is our policy.?”I will say it is to wage by land, sea and air with All the strength that god can give us . . . victory at all costs.victory in spite Of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be.”[2] Churchill previous warnings about german ambitions were vindicated, and  public pressure led Chamberlain to bring him into the war cabinet as first Lord Of the Admiralty. There he proved to be as energetic as he had in 1914, but curiously It was his championing of another disastrous amphibious operation, the anglo-french Expedition to Norway to take Narvik, which led to Chamberlain’s resignation in 1940 -many Conservatives blamed the Prime Minister, not the first lord, for the debacle-and to Churchill’s replacing him on May 10, 1940, in a coalition government with all-party support.

 

Churchill was undoubtedly an inspirational wartime leader. His pugnacity and rousing speeches rallied the nation to continue the fight after the fall of france and the evacuation of Dunkirk. During the dark days of 1940, through the battle of Britain and The blitz when britain stood alone against the axis  powers, he urged his compatriots To conduct themselves so that, “if the British Empire and its common wealth last for a thousand years, men will still say: ‘this was their finest hour.’” He successfully resisted pressure from inside the war cabinet for a compromise peace with germany In may 1940 and placed his hopes for eventual victory on the intervention of the  United States in the war on britain’s side. There was little sign of this during the summer of 1940, but with the successful outcome of the battle of Britain, president Franklin D. Roosevelt decided to support britain, not by direct american intervention But with naval assistance and military lend-lease aid. When Germany invaded the soviet union in June 1941, Churchill welcomed this new adherent to the allied cause, this despite his implacable hostility towards the soviet regime in the 1920s. he was  Overjoyed when the United States entered the war in december 1941 after the japanese attack on Pearl Harbour. Churchill established close ties with Roosevelt and the soviet  Leader Joseph Stalin, forming a triumvirate at the head of what he termed the  “grand alliance”. Travelling ceaseleesly, he laboured to coordinate military strategy

against Adolf Hitler and the axis.

 

 

For a time Roosevelt generally adopted Churchill’s strategic ideas, such as the Prime Minister’s insistence on the invasion of North Africa in 1942 instead of a cross-channel  assault, which the american army chiefs wanted. However after 1943, as the United States had become immeauserably more powerful, Churchill was forced increasingly to accept american army-imposed war plans, despite his vigorous courting of roosevelt by means of frequent face-to-face meetings in the united states, canada, and North Africa. Churchill’s warnings after the yalta conference in early 1945 about Stalin’s european ambitions were ignored-roosevelt wanted to work with stalin for A peace post-war order. British general elections were held during the potsdam Conference, the last great “BIG THREE” conference in the summer of 1945, with Churchill present for part of the time. Given his popularity as wartime leader, he Was not acpected to be defeated at the election. However, the Labour Party won

by a landslide. British public opinion was alienated by Churchill’s repugnance For social and economic reform (he had taken very little interest in domestic Policies during the war), nor did it wish to return to the slump and unemploment Of the 1930s with the conservatives were now identifed.

 

 

Inevetibly churchill was critical of the “welfare state” reforms of his succesor, Clement Attlee. He vioced his suspicions of the Soviet danger in his famous iron Curtian speech in Fulton, Missouri, in 1946. He became Prime Minister again from 1951-1955, but apart from occasional prophetic warnings about the danger of  nuclear devastation, he was handicapped by age and poor health from accomplishing much, and it was not an auspicious end to his long political career. After his resignation in 1955, he devoted his last years to painting and writing. He died on January 24,1965, at the age of 90. Following a state funeral he was buried at Bladon, near Blenheim Palace, the one-time home of his ancestor John Churchill, 1st Duke of Marlborough.

 

Churchill was a prolific historic writer, although much of his work was dedicated to justifying his past actions and his place in history. His most famous works are The World Crisis (4 vol.,1923-1929) ,My early life (1930),marlborough (4 vol,1933-1938),the Second World War (6 vols,1948-1953), and a history of the english- speaking peoples (4 vols., 1956-1958). He received the nobel prize for literature and a  knighthood (he refused a Dukedom) in 1953.

 

 

 

Churchill’s death in 1965 marked the end of an era in British history. Born into an aristocratic family, he participated in Britian’s transformation from british empire To welfare state and its decline as a world power, devlopments which he bitterly Regretted. He is particularly remembered for his courageous stand as Prime Minister in 1940 and 1941, when Britain stood alone against perhaps the most dangerous adversary it had faced in its long history.

 

 

                                                  

SHORT QUESTIONS

 

Q1

Bibliography

Keegan, John. Who’s Who in World War 11, Oxford University Press, united states, 1978.

 

Q2

EXPERIENCES/SKILLS

 

Studying for this topic, I was introduced to the skills of research.

 

1.     I have learnt to look thourgh the local libraries to find suitable books on the topic.

2.     I used internet search engines to find extra information for my essay.

3.     I have learnt new skills on Microsoft Word.

4.     I have also learnt to read and compare many different sources for my essay

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q3

Review

Churchill:a biography by

Roy Jenkins

 

 

Synopsis

Roy Jenkin’s “Churchill” is an exhaustive biographical picture of one of the most enigmatic  figures of the 20th century. From the admiralty to the miner’s strike, from the Battle of Britain to the Nobel prize, Churchill oversaw some of the most important

Events the world has ever seen. Roy jenkins presents these events, while also managing to convey the contradictions and quirks in churchill’s character.

 

 

Amazon.co.uk review

Book buyers will never tire of reading about Winston Churchill, for “ the greatest adventurer of modern political history”(ra butler’s verdict) led a life of action-packed Drama and global significance. Roy jenkins’ churchill is the latest bioagraphy of this Great briton, following closely in the tailwind of geoffrey best’s churchill:a study in Greatness. Where best restores altitude to churchill’s dipping reputation, seeing off Academic critics of the last decade or so, jenkins provides a jumbo-size old-fashioned Biography, lauding his subject’s achievements, sympathising with his quirks,and stepping lightly over his well-known mistakes. As he did in his earlier biographies of Dilke, asquith and gladstone, jenkins sticks closely to the published record, utilised in Particular the definitive researches of martin gilbert, but he brings the authority and the inside knowledge of british politics to his book, slipping in his own memories of

Churchill, and his own comparable experience sat the cabinet table.it is all here, from The boer wars to the nuclear bomb, from the hustings in oldham to the diplomacy of Yalta, with due coverage of the big moments-at the board of trade and the admiralty in asquith’s peacetime and wartime cabinets, taking on the appeasers in the 1930s and hitler in the 1940s. all the books are here, and  all the political relationships tetchy and touchy alike, from lloyd george to baldwin, smuts to stalin, and of course, the british people. Like its subject the book the bulky and at times indulgent, but impossible not to enjoy

 

eugeneol

I read this biography following a review by garret fiztgerald (former pm of ireland), and I was not dissapointed with his recommendation. Everyone knows that wsc was a true giant of the 20th century politics and inspired war leader, but roy jenkins’ book geos much cheaper than this.

 

The bkook is slightly heavy going in certain places-in particular, the “wilderness years” Had little appeal to me. As an avid reader of biographies, I found for most part of balance of personal detail with historical record. Being irish, I found that much of The early 20th century material relies on the readers knowledge of british history,which I did not have.

 

I found the freqeunt comparisons of events in wsc’s political life to events of recent Years a great for roy jenkins to place events in context and to give them a clearer Understanding.

 

Like many other reviewers, I found the liberal use by rj of words I’ve never heard of before unnessary and occasionally irritating. The grammer is first class throughout, Though there is a duplication of the word “the” at the bottom of page 706 in the hard back edition (I felt certain triumph on spotting the error). However, readers should Not be put off by roy jenkin’s seemingly superior vocabulary.

 

This book is a must for readers of biographies. It is superb piece of work that Captures all the inspiration and leadership qualities of a remarkable man.

 

 

 

 

Q4

When I first started history I was informed about the essay in class. I was told about The essay and that it was worth 20% of my leaving cert marks. I was given a week to think about my topic because it was a tough decision to make but I should have made a better decision because I think irish history is much more interesting. I checked out the school library for my bibliography the books I used were interesting. I chose the books, who’s who in world war two and world war one. I also went on the internet For information about my topic and found lots of information on the BBC website. Afterwards I got more info from microsoft incarta. I read the info from the books that I got from the library and the net which I found interesting because of its background. As soon as I completed my research I planed out how I am going to lay my essay. I wrote first draft and adead extra bits from my books and from the info from the net

And checked all the dates. As soon as I completed my research, plan ,draft and adead My extra bits I typed it out using microsoft word, printed it out to check it. Then I made several changes and corrections to my essay to put the finnishing touch. I printed it out because I finished my essay and then put it on the school website for others to read it.

 

 



[1] Historic figures, bbc history website.

 2 JOHN KEEGAN, WHO’S WHO IN WORLD WAR TWO, PAGE 31.