coleman power

Coleman v Power (2004) 220 CLR 1 is a High Court of Australia case that deals with the implied right to freedom of political communication found in the Australian Constitution.

Background

Coleman was a law and politics student from Townsville. He started handing out fliers in a shopping centre alleging police corruption in the Queensland police force. He was asked to stop by Power, a police officer, but refused. Coleman was subsequently arrested for assaulting language, but violently resisted arrest. Coleman Powermate - A division of Coleman offering a range of Power Inverters and Jumpstart Systems. He was charged with using "insulting words" under the Vagrancy Act.

Coleman argued he was not guilty of using insulting words because they were political communication and thus protected under the implied freedom of political communication. A magistrate found him guilty, but he then appealed. All subsequent appeals failed. He then appealed to the High Court. Coleman Power.

Decision

The court held that his conviction should be set aside.

Gummow, Hayne and Kirby JJ thought the Act didn't actually cover Coleman's words. What he said was not insulting as intended to be outlawed by the Act. The court's majority accepted that communications alleging corruption of police were protected by the implied right to freedom of political communication. They also accepted that political communication could include insults. Coleman Power Failure Light.