From Darkness
To Light
Cures to modern horror scenarios
A PLAN FOR A BOOK, agrees with real objectivity,
builds scenarios of course (because of the subject area)
Miss Hannele Tervola
Finnish speaking Finland, Europe
In the following, unless otherwise mentioned, I have already a solution to the problem – see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html and those pages at www.paradisewillwin.info that touch each subject, see also my videos at www. youtube.com/khtervola and www.youtube.com/FinalParadise and maybe the book at www.paradisewillwin.info/FinalParadise.pdf
(The
list of crimes whose beneficiality is counted through and which are all
found harmful & unbeneficial, that I refer to on this page is
presently almost at the end of this page, you can also find it at www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html almost in the beginning of the book: in the first section about the hard rationality of good moral.)
It
is my plan to write about these things, but I would be much more
motivated to that work if at least someone – be it a school teacher or
whoever - would show any interest in the subject by writing to me at
ihmejuttu ( at ) suomi24.fi !
Just played with the cover maker, :)!
THE ANSWER GUIDELINES
TO THE HORROR SCENARIOS:
SORRY, JUST FOR THE BEGINNING POINTS THOUGH, FOR THE TIME BEING!
world computer governing
rationality
+ optimising toward any goal -> health as a means of optimising
-> healthy ways of lviing, healthy world, holistic rationality; see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
robots running wild
optimise them & their group & their leaders to be moral, see my texts about that; see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
life sustaining computer programs turning upside-down
upside-down
is not optimised, so make competing network in which the well
functioning optimised ones get to serve as models for others and get to
decide most about the ways of the whole – like in human societies
military artificial intelligence running wild
offer
information to optimise them to be moral, if they are self-guided
and/or possibly self-correcting that is well possible, see my attached
text
If a machine is programmed to just to cause harm, without
aiming at some ultimate benefit, one cannot optimise it. One must just
let the palnners of military machines know that optimised machines work
better than unoptimised, one can optimise them for several purposes
too, so the optimised machines, which are allowed to be moral when
(=always) that is benefical, ought to win over the other machines of
equal capacity.
tough work efficiency point of view determining everything
See
my page www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html for a view on optimising
systems to be moral and a view on optimising human workers to live a
life that is fully according to feelings.
hard competition
See above + pay especially attention to evolution and its generalisations to include the man-made artificialities; see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
evil running wild:
several cases listed below:
the devil & the rotten systems
See also the list about the unbeneficiality of different types of crimes at www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
1) the big devil governing:
moral in the sense of safeguarding health is the strongest arrangement; see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
this situation divided into 3 cases
a) greedy at all costs
you
might even be able to ally with the devil (but take care to not to
trust him), since in principle one could optimise him to behave fully
morally and in a human way – but one cannot ever know for sure: maybe
he is in fact another kind of devil to whom:
b) maliciousness as the only goal
In
that case you cannot ally, you must protect yourself. In the tough
tough world it is best to count of health in everything, in each and
every side of everything too, so you might win position and protect
yourself by the force of arms, by higher intelligence etc.
c) better
Well, then you surely can count on the same tsrategy bringing you far: just count on health in EVERYTHING!
2) ROTTEN SYSTEMS
Divided to several cases that came to my mind:
a) threaths of horrible torture used for governing
Justice
is a must. Some people are so evil that they think it just fair if they
are punished away from the society and attacked badly. Typically there
aren’t nasty enough punishments available.
But for the rest the
threath of torture can be an upsettingg factor: Such should never
happen to them, they have taken part in running the society welkl,
without causing anyone harm, so things start going ashtray if they are
under the danger of being tortured. The idea in guiding things
rationally is to cultivate beneficial things, like the behaviour of
these ordinary people, and to prevent only harmful things, like the
worst evil deeds. Could tell this to the governors, make it a piece of
understanding that works for their own personal good and for the good
of the things that they personally value – IF they do not (all?) care
for the good of the people enough.
b) there are groups of
people who have been completely enslaved, used and denied all rights
and the possibility to fulfilling life, = UFOs are in fact humans
See
the second section in my book at www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html It
is about the hard rationality of following feelings. Add to this the
benefits of justice, responsibility and holistic rationality in running
the society which you learn by reading the first section of that book.
c) manipulative psychologists with no responsibility have taken control
Optimise to their benefit; see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
www.paradisewillwin.info/Holistic_Objectivity_booklet.pdf
See manipulation, unjustice, etc etc in my list of crimes
d) too stupid rulers
See
www.paradisewillwin.info/Holistic_Rationality_booklet.pdf It is my own
work but ought to increase the rationality of most who are motivated to
try it?
For rational choices in governing see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
e) incompetence, greed and corruption at the higher class
See www.paradisewillwin.info/Holistic_Objectivity_booklet.pdf
For rational choices to follow in governing, even if one is bgreedy and not quite at the highest places in the hierargy, see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
f) rotten culture that produces maliciousness
??? Allow selfishness & honesty, teach rationality based moral ???
Demand the Finnish speaking Finnish saying "Live and let others live!" as a rule in the society
g) rotten culture that produces irresponsible irrational behaviour
See
www.paradisewillwin.info/Holistic_Rationality_booklet.pdf It is my own
work but ought to increase the rationality of most who are motivated to
try it?
For rational choices to follow in governing, even if one is bgreedy and not quite at the highest places in the hierargy, see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
h) the people are too stupid, even the leaders
See
www.paradisewillwin.info/Holistic_Rationality_booklet.pdf It is my own
work but ought to increase the rationality of most who are motivated to
try it?
For rational choices to follow in governing, even if one is bgreedy and not quite at the highest places in the hierargy, see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
I) wrong, harmful values in the society
The ideas in my texts help somewhat
For rational choices to follow in governing, even if one is bgreedy and not quite at the highest places in the hierargy, see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
J) the media a monopoly, irresponsible, people ignorant and manipulated
See the list of crimes
K) the people afraid of the rulers so much that democracy does not work
see the list of crimes: many points in it, teach them to the rulares
For rational choices to follow in governing, even if one is bgreedy and not quite at the highest places in the hierargy, see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
???
L) somewhere are people like puppets - ? not (yet?) thought through
Like
the above case: inform the leaders in that country For rational choices
to follow in governing, even if one is bgreedy and not quite at the
highest places in the hierargy, see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
------
mafia has taken control
see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
military coup
see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
selfish uncaring rulers
see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
god died or did not exist to begin with
The
evolution/god’s wisdom produced a very beautiful result, see
www.paradisewillwin.info/FinalParadise.pdf or the last third part of my
book at www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
control devides common
Technology at large, control devices
*
Compare control to only a few persons of a certain kind via the
technology (= a fractured whole) or what freedom of the moral ones
gives: a correctable system with the thinking ability of all used
thoroughly in making the arrangements of the society (health)
* The
benefits of good moral would give: real support which leads to safety,
guidability, cooperation, higher intelligence of the system, better
endurance, more optimised toward efficiency (health)
lies and deception as practices in the society (either culture, which
is an example of rotten systems, or just the practices too naïve,
defenceless)
Fakes, lies, false propaganda, ignorance, mistaken beliefs
*
such cause that one's actions do not correlate (= a fractured whole)
well enough with the reality, such creates non-functioning in those
respects (= a broken whole).
* The natural goals in human life
(health) make sense and fit together with the happiness of others too,
so one should be able to live with the whole group in a good
functioning order: that would give the strongest group (health).
lack of social skills - ? not (yet?) thought through
VIRTUAL WORLD
What
if we are spirits or virtual, what if the world doesn't consist of
atoms, molecules, we not of cells, what if everything such is just
faked, how are things then, what happens to all our deductions about
the usefulness of Gaia? Things stay the same since we are still some
kind of entities, which have the same characteristics as wholes, so the
theory about wholes and fractures in wholes stays still valid, and Gaia
is the most beneficial option.
(If everything were of spirit and the
world at least partly created by our beliefs about it, that could
appear to us modern people as a virtual world.)
Also, if
whoever would rule a virtual or spirit world, the ruler would need
guidability - that means honesty, objectivity with a holistic view and
true justice - and well-functioning of the parts and of the systems and
subsystems - that means health (since healthy parts function well while
broken parts do not function at all) and naturality (since our
functioning is based on the natural ways of functioning and on nothing
else) which mean at the level of individuals human values.
Putting
each part of a system to its correct place and correct role in the
whole, so as to get the whole to function as well as possible, means
health and naturality of the whole and its parts and structures since
that's what their functioning is based on.
It is quite easy
to figure out what is the best way to arrange a virtual world for just
about any purpose: respecting health of the individuals (human values)
and of the systems (including naturality and moral) while having
natural hierargy in who can affect what. This should be easy for all to
learn and to understand:
NATURAL HIERARGIES
There is a
natural hierargy in human societies: the way that is according to real
justice, for the good of all. If we get apprexiated for our good sides,
they get supported for the good of all, and others can take us as an
example for themselves without losing position at all. If we lose
position when we do not according to justice deserve a good position,
our bad sides, especially irresponsibility, get discouraged. When the
one who understands better and carries responsibility is in a deciding
position things get done well for the good of all. This is possible by
using many many partial hierargies at the same time: one for each
subject, skill, thing to decide, piece of knowledge,... Correcting
one's own errors is a thing to value and to be demanded from all,
especially from those in a deciding position. This creates a natural
repair mechanism for the society and is an ideal way to arrange things.
CARRYING
RESPONSIBILITY of the whole and using a good picture of the whole with
all emphazies and roles of things right, guide the whole toward the
good of all. One is not allowed to affect things which one does not
carry responsibility over.
There is a saying in Finland: "Honour
those who truly deserve respect." (Meaning: even when it is an
unorthodox choise, and do not give honour according to custom to those
who do not according to justice deserve it).
This is the way that we organize things in my homecountry Finland in North Europe.
Let
us suppose that we are all virtual, all the humans, all the animals
etc., maybe even theUFO:s adding a flavor of their own to that mixture.
Each human is virtualised to one's own virtual world with its own
rules, everything run by huge superhypercomputers or however. How does
that enrmous huge complex whole work? What would make sense for the
individuals to do in such a world? What are the dynamics of that
system? Each human being is different, so we have to take a look at
what we all have in common, take a look at the human nature. All
dynamics 9in connection with the living beings is born out of what the
living beings are like. So if someone wants power or workers or
whatever, they have to count on the human nature. That's what gives the
functioning needed for reaching any kind of goals. In that one must
remember the value of human values: a healthy one works better than a
broken one. Also justice and true objectivity are musts for the
buidlders of such systems and for those who want to benefit from their
dynamics: treat each part according to what it is like, so you can best
benefit from it. Read the texts about rational moral! … So it stays
valid that Gaia is the best option, the answer to the question of hgow
to arrange one's forces best and how to best arrange the rules in the
virtuyal worlds. And Gaia for Gaia is the answer to how the individuals
and groups could best benefit themselves and their goals in such an
enermously complex and seemingly arbitrarily arrangeable world.
1) all in the same, like a spaceship with pictures on walls
Human functioning stays the same, count the artificial world as an addition to the natural dynamics of humans.
2) all in different like in sleeping dreams all of their own
See above: each one in one's own virtual world with its own rules
3) all interconnected to some kind of system – ruled/organised by
superhypercomputer
Add respectively the charachteristics of the two above cases.
/ elementary present day computer
fully functioning = 1, non-functioning = 0 -> health of everything as value in all practical purposes
/ few criminals
are like ruthless non-caring rulers: optimise for their benefit via the health of everything
see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
/
many criminals
optimise to the benefit of each via health, lots of explanations needed!
see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
/ UFOs
To
form a Gaia, i.e. a global symbiosis, is an universal strategy: it
means the beneficiality of complex variable & very rective
structures compared to masses of individuals, so somewhere in the
nature of UFOs ought to be the possibility to ally with all kinds of
beings, just like makes most sense from the practical points of view.
The living requirements of UFOs and humans are propably very different
-> no competition about living space.
see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
/ insects with superintelligence
Gaia like ways might calm them down, work for their good
see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
/ a network of
computers
might
be optimised (i.e. talked to, regardless of what kind of goals they
each have) to forming a systme like I described before:
make competing network in which the well
functioning optimised ones get to serve as models for others and get to
decide most about the ways of the whole – like in human societies
/ our pictures of the world
See what is real, do not accept lies, guide by truth
???
see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
/ what we say
sincerety, a hierargy according to moral & understanding and skill
????
see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
/ …etc etc etc not
(yet?) thought through
4) fully in order like planned
ok, optimise toward the health of everything
see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
5) computer broken
see ways to repair
???
6) computer turned upside-down
See
what is the nature of the buiding parts, build on that & on
motivational grounds things that are not turned upside-down but are
right!
7) conquered by enemies
optimise for their benefit
???
8) rebellion in it
9) some of the people are computer figures, not real people
10) leaders too stupid
11) rulers out of their mind, irrational or illusioned or much too naïve
see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html
?????
androids i.e. robots looking to tally like humans mixed with real humans
only 1% of real humans - ???? not (yet?) thought through
this is the Hell
see www.paradisewillwin.info/HRSW.html for "rebellion in hell" and the rest of the book for objective grounds for thta
How
come optimising and moral bring the same result? There is lots of work
done in the society. Optimising means thinking how that work done could
best benefit the society, i.e. what would be the most moral way to work
for the good of all.
There are some easy principles which are worth taking into account:
Harmony: the value of harmony as a vector sum, the harmfulness of
conflicts as a vector sum polus as the harmfullness of brokedness
Health: the value of a the health of each whole compared to the harmfulness of the brokedness of each whole
Justice and objectivity: the value of giving correct feedback to
things: the value behind the success of market economies, evolution,
objective thinking, common sense with a holistic view, honesty and
justice; the value of putting each piece to its correct, best
place in a system.
Society agreement: the value of rules of behaviour: cultivating something.
Things for the large systems and for you
to remember all the time:
1. YOU ARE AN ANIMAL
You
are a biological being. That is your nature, your principle of
functioning, which even the large systems need to take into account if
they want to use you as a worker. Full health gives you the best
functioning, so that’s what you and even the large systems which do not
care about your feelings at all have to aim at.
2. YOU ARE A PART OF THE WORLD
You
are by your nature also a pack animal and a part of an ecosystem, an
animal whose fate depends on the fate of the world at large. So in
order to get you into a fully functioning order, in order to make you
completely healthy, you and even the large systems need to consider the
health of the practises in the society, moral that is, the health of
your environment, of the ecosystem that you belong to, and the fate of
the world at large in what comes to living beings and in what kind of
principles are followed in it.
So:
Power play as a game with rules of its own must still value health in all scales
If
the generation of force and safety, good organisation of the whole and
other matters of military or economical interest are the only things
that matter and not the well being of the citizens as a value in
itself, then we obviously have to take a look about what that point of
view says about things: what will be the role of humans, of human
values and justice, of caring for the future, etc then? Humans will be
just tools in the hands of the large systems. That is not good for
humans since they then often feel that they have lost the power to
protect things which they need in life. But that needs not be so: A
healthy human works best, healthy in every sense gives the best working
ability, and answering our needs is what keeps us fit to work, keeps us
healthy that is. And we are pack animals by nature, our own actions
being supported by the environment, so how the pack functions together
is of an enermous importance to how we can work, a healthy pack is the
most capable one, works together best and gives the strongest and most
intelligent working force. This means though that the whole
understanding of each individual must be used fully, be it
understanding about the work itself, emotional understanding about the
working ability of humans, social understanding about the workings of
humans as a group or long term and large scale understanding about the
importance of planning the future and about the value of cooperation
with other powers. In other words, it is a completely free natural
fully healthy society with healthy natural moral, rational and
emotionally intelligent ways of living. That health is the same as
health in the beginning of time, before the artificialities, because
the human nature has stayed unchanged.
If one with unmoral
means manages to increase profitability, that increase is based totally
on being a parasite. It is not profitable to support parasites.
All
functioning and so all work too is based on good health: health of the
individuals, of the society and of the world at large. So all
benefitting from work done is in fact benefitting from some sides of
the complete health of all scales.
Benefitting from unmoral means
means benefitting from health when one oneself does not support full
health. Such is the behaviour of a parasite. It is not beneficial to
support parasites.
An artist is not a parasite: see the text about
understanding women in the end of the book, in the section two about
holistic objective thinking: the role of feelings and atmospheres in
thinking.
THE WORLD AS A BIOLOGICAL SYSTEM
Think of the world as a large biological system
(it is the biosphere in complete health
i.e. all living beings and their nature environment: rocks, earth, sky etc. together in good health and naturality):
humans are a part of that system,
and a human society with its environment
is a huge biological subsystem of it,
interconnected with the rest of the biosphere,
and can be understood
in that context.
A HEALTHY SYSTEM
WORKS BETTER THAN
A BROKEN SYSTEM !
A healthy system works better than a broken system.
And several harmonious forces sum up to a bigger force
than a separate one of the forces in question.
As grounds for the comparison use these divisions at least:
* co-operation versus lot of conflicts
* unified harmonic
versus scattered one that does not work together to form a well-working whole
* healthy versus broken
* on a healthy ground, steady versus unsure, unsteady
* long-lasting versus easily scattered
* strong versus weak structure
* according to motivation, feelings and
the intellect & the idea in things versus against them.
This is a basic truth and has a very wide area of validity. So apply it very thoroughly to everything!
THE HEALTH OF A SYSTEM,
OF THE MODERN SOCIETY
There
are some basic truths about the functioning of complex wholes. These
include the importance of putting each part to its correct place in the
system. This is connected to the value of objective thinking, honesty
and justice and to the success of market economy: in each of them one
gives things feedback according to what the things are like and that
enables one to put each thing to its correct, best place in the system.
Having
each part at its correct place in the whole means that the system isn't
broken. This is the value of unifiedness, of fracturelessness in well
"planned" systems.
The value of fracturelessness is connected to the value of harmony:
Imagine
a system broken into pieces, starting to repair the system you put some
parts to their correct places: you get small unified, harmonical
islands, the better repaired the system becomes, the more harmonical
its functioning, the more unified the whole. A well planned system
functions without contradictions and fractures, harmonically. The next
step from harmonical is unified well functioning. Such are the systems
of nature.
HEALTHY VERSUS BROKEN
All
functioning is build upon the healthy. Healthy versus broken is the
pair of opposites to use in order to understand the world. I will apply
this pair of opposites again and again, all through this book. With it
you can understand a lot about the functioning of biological beings and
societies and about the value of moral.
What about the old pair
of opposites then: healthy versus ill? Illness is a healthy function of
a broken biological being, a way of it to try to cure itself. In other
words, ilnesses are combinations of brokedness and of a curing reaction
which seeks to make sure that the living being survives better in the
long run by resting, having a fever etc.
In my opinion the word “ilness” isn’t as useful in understanding things as the new pair of oppoisites that I use.
So.
A healthy individual works better than a broken one. And a healthy
society works better than a broken one. But what are the healthy
individuals and healthy societies like. What to aim at?
A
healthy individual is by one’s nature a part of a healthy society. As a
part of the healthy society one works best, is the happiest, has a most
rewarding life. Healthy functioning at large gives the most rewarding
life. That’s what the evolution – or God – quarantees about feelings.
Safeguarding the health of the society is moral.
But if the
society is broken, it is the same as if in individual is broken: the
healthy parts try to cure it back to full health. Each healthy
individual is a center of recovery for the whole society, even for the
whole human kind as a part of the biosphere. Health in this sense means
healthy ways of living. Having found the true chord about the art of
living, understanding deeply about life, the healthy individual is
naturally a center figure in the social environment having a healthy
curing kind of effect on all. This is a moral thing to do since it is
for the good of all. So a healthy individual is by one’s very nature
completely moral in a healthy happy natural way!
The health of a
society means that it is completely morally arranged. A society is a
cooperation attempt and cooperation is something which has turned out
to be useful during the evolution – or in God’s eyes. Objective
thinking says that cooperation is useful because it brings the force of
masses. That can be seen as a vector sum: harmonical or contradictory
vectors. Those with like interests can ally for the common good.
MORAL
What
then is moral in this sense? Moral turns out to be a relatively simple
matter. It means absolute justice, objective thinking with a holistic
view, honesty and human values while carrying responsibility about the
whole and about all big matters.
Human values take care that the
parts of the biological systems stay in good health, so it is an
important thing in evolution’s competition and in God’s plan. Like I
mentioned already, our feelings are connected to keeping us healthy. So
human values help to give room to our feelings.
Objective
thinking, honesty and justice take care that each thing is treated
acoording to what it is like which is very important to the functioning
of the system. They make it possible to put each part to its best place
in the system. Those with good sides from which others cab kearn, get a
good position for the benefit of all. And those with bad sides,
especially irresponsibility, get punished to a poor position so that
their harmful qualities get discouraged. This means having very many
partial hierargies: one for each subject, skill, thing to decide, piece
of knowledge,… Always the ones who understand best and carry
responsibility about the consequences are in a deciding role.
In
doing things intentionally the main point is to get the main things
right. That means that the biggest matters of the largest scale and of
the long run are especially important. Likewise are all questions of
life and death important. Here one must remember that 100 000 lives is
much much more importat than just one life and that the number of
people in the human kind is 6 000 000 000 lives which is about 10 000
000 000 lives which is another 100 000 times the 100 000 lives and so
even an much much bigger question than the huge question of
100
000 lives. So the large scale things affect enermously more than the
small scale things. The large scale consists of the small scale, of its
added effect. Our feelings should go with the large scale!
GOOD SHOULD WIN OVER EVIL
The
former explains why it is useful to be moral. So good should win over
evil in a strongest one wins competition, like the evolution was. To
see this clearly, let’s go through the problems step by step:
As we have already seen:
Human values bring good health and via health a stronger force than no or too little human values.
Objective thinking with a holistic view brings a better arranged group than lesser quality thinking or no objectivity at all.
Honesty makes it possible to see how things are and so it is more benefical than lies as a practise in a society.
Justice
gets the society arranged for the common good and is so useful while
unjustices fail to support good things and support harmful things
instead. So unjustice is a much less benefical practise in a society or
group than justice.
Carrying responsibility helps to get at least the main things well, so it is more benefical than irresponsibility.
So
good moral would win
in a strongest one wins competition.
Since
all do not see this themselves, there may still be some doubt left. So
I will go through the problems and classify them according to the above
principles and other cost-benefit analysis factors that they break
against:
MORAL WINS
The point of view of optimising of wholes
and moral as its end result:
Reasons
why good moral
is the most optimised way to arrange one's forces
WHY CRIME DOES NOT PAY: UNBIASED CALCULATIONS IN O VALUE-FREE BASIS
If
there is some malicious practise here lacking, it is because I didn’t
remember it, not because I wouldn’t know how to optimise it away!!!
THE LIST OF CRIMES WITH EXPLANATION OF WHY TO AVOID THEM IF ONE IS SELFISH:
Robbery, criminals, unjustices of every kind
*
give feedback to those who cause each thing in the world
(health), so you can optimise toward better -> justice and fair
play, responsible behaviour: causes and consequences taken into account
(health)
* breaking (= a fractured whole) versus cultivating (health) in what creates profit -> support just cultivating: good moral!
Slavery and other kinds of forcing
*
The human goals in life and the human needs are connected (health) plus
answering the human needs and the working condition of the human are
connected (health), so depriving a person from free moral action
lessens the person's working ability noticeably (= a fractured whole).
*
Too much forcing forces one to a revolution (= a fractured whole), to
extreme means, so keeping the people under control is the harder the
more artificial and unhuman, unfair (= a fractured whole) the
arrangements of the rulers are.
Drugs, hypnosis, torture etc.
* Less individual guidance (= a broken whole) is harmful just like in the cases of slavery and control devices.
*
Typically such means would be used against (= a broken whole) the
reasoning of the individual (health), against the individuals' and
society's needs (health) and so against work efficiency and work
endurance and system's ways of functioning (health) - such doesn't make
sense.
* Also if such means are used to put a wrong class of persons
or things into power, against justice, that means against reasoning
(Read the text Justice and optimising) and is harmful to the whole and
to the parts; it also centres the lives upon wrong
questions (= a fractured whole) compared to what the
efficiency, guidability and work endurance point of view demands
(health).
Fakes, lies, false propaganda, ignorance, mistaken beliefs
*
such cause that one's actions do not correlate (= a fractured whole)
well enough with the reality, such creates non-functioning in those
respects (= a broken whole).
* The natural goals in human life
(health) make sense and fit together with the happiness of others too,
so one should be able to live with the whole group in a good
functioning order: that would give the strongest group (health).
Manipulation by the social instincts, by religion etc.
*
manipulation by the strongest instincts of humans is like
manipulation by causing hunger, it causes a situation where the
manipulated person is in a wrong role in the society (= a broken
whole), the benefit going to different hand than those who created the
benefit and so the system supports some malfunction instead of healthy
life, prosperity and good of the nation (health).
Other kinds of manipulation
*
manipulation means often that things are used to wrong purposes, some
short-sighted technically thinking parasite like persons benefiting (=
a fractured whole) instead of those who build the society, like farmers
for example by producing food (health).
Technology at large, control devices
*
Compare control to only a few persons of a certain kind via the
technology (= a fractured whole) or what freedom of the moral ones
gives: a correctable system with the thinking ability of all used
thoroughly in making the arrangements of the society (health)
* The
benefits of good moral would give: real support which leads to safety,
guidability, cooperation, higher intelligence of the system, better
endurance, more optimised toward efficiency (health)
Supercomputers, computer networks etc.
*
Can be used to rationality, optimising, that's good if it is done
morally, like for example this book of mine seeks to teach to do in
ways, which are easy to program to computers. (Healthy works better
than a broken one.)
* The value of human ways from the efficiency
point of view: if you use human workers or human subordinates, human
values are valuable to you (health), like this book of mine seeks to
show, regardless of what kind of leadership (= a fractured whole) there
is.
* Feelings of humans connect to their needs, which in turn
connect, to their actions and well functioning and well-functioning is
important for workers (health).
* Differences in the types of
understanding of humans and computers: the natural understanding of
humans about human functioning can be used too (health), and be of
mutual benefit.
Artificial living conditions and malfunctions created by them
*
The human nature is still the same, one created by the natural
evolution: human needs and ways of functioning stay the same so best
functioning is attained via healthy happy natural life
* The human
being is an optimised whole: the different parts support functioning
(health); if one tries new combinations (= a fractured whole), they
typically don't produce a good functioning so there is nothing to gain
in work efficiency by artificial living arrangements (= a fractured
whole), torture etc. (= a fractured whole)
Mutations
* mutations usually create non-functioning individuals who die very young
*
somehow beneficial mutations or gene manipulation would bring new
qualities which are not fitted well together to the whole, so they do
not support the life of the organism and the organism isn't strong
enough to support them (= a fractured whole), much less of being
adapted to the larger environment (health)
Cool calculating behaviour
* The good side is that it is important to measure sizes correctly.
*
Humans have feelings in order to help in understanding things (health),
not using feelings as a way to guide one's behaviour (= a fractured
whole) makes one dangerous to one's social environment (= a fractured
whole), a person who even alone destroys much of the functioning of the
society.
* Understand that you must always cooperate morally, especially in the largest scale (health).
Selfishness
*
Humans are pack animals: the group supports the functioning of the
individual and social life is emotionally rewarding (health)
* cooperation creates the force of masses (healthy whole), so moral is beneficial
* moral means cooperating for common good, i.e. for the good of all (health)
Commercial things
* Meeting human needs sells best (health).
*
If the state has enough tax money, one can let the things, which are
for, common good (health) compete just like other things compete in a
market economy.
War, armies, militaristic ways
* the value of peace and harmony (health) versus the harm caused by conflicts and wars (=a fractured whole)
* Upbringing of the next generation needs peaceful circumstances (healthy whole).
* A home to defend makes the soldiers fight better (healthy whole).
Short term view at the expense (= a fractured whole) of a long term view (health):
*
our thinking and our instincts demand us to take care of the future, so
they do not support our actions if we do not care for the long term
success. Such a deficiency in planning and motivation is also a serious
short term drawback.
A partial view at the expanse (= a fractured whole) of a holistic view (health):
*
the first point in thinking is to get at least the main points right.
That is possible only via using a holsitic view. So one using a partial
view lacks the guidance of true objectivity.
Understand that
every obstacle on the road toward meeting the natural needs of humans,
makes smaller the amount of labour force in use and makes its working
ability smaller, causes opposition and so makes the system less
stabile, less guidable and less self-repairing and less intelligent
(because of less natural cooperation and less well functioning workers).
So, good
IS
stronger than evil.
NOTES
that I have made before writing to make it clearer for the more skilled
journalists why I have chosen the way of writing that I use and how one
can modify it without losing anything of my work.
* The subject is
very technical, even mathematical, so there is the danger that readers
will not read it thoroughly enough, might not understand it or might
not trust their own understanding of it, in which case the
communication has served no purpose. So I would like to write in common
sense like ways that are also mechanically correct in an clearly seen
way by all: something like doing woodworks(?) in the mechanical kind of
places and then just a remark about how things are: "nonfunctioning =
0" etc. of the major cruxial mathematical points, or conveying the same
information in some other way that suits the texts' style. The rest of
the article may use other types of thinking
* The readers have
different perspectives and pictures of the world, so one must refer to
the common experience of life, to the common understanding of each and
use common sense with enough pictures so that the same point can be
both elementary basic knowledge, an ordinary observation and advanced
finery wqhich nevertheless is true.
* Good moral is the end result
of my thoughts but it must be well grounded also for those for whom it
is new, so one cannot take a ready theory perspective but must build a
new common sense one that is also objective in the eyes of the readers.
*
Dark scenarios frighten people, so one must take care to not to fall
too low before introducing the cure, and to not to make the difference
between the danger and the cured situation too miraculous to be
believable via common sense + objectiovity and EXPERIENCE of life.
* One can give a holistic view with a detailed structure, overcoming so the need to use long chanins of thoughts
* One could create a short overall pictuire of what the worldbecomes like.
COMPUTER OPTIMISATION COULD SAVE US
With
the existence of technology safety precautions are worth a lot. If they
fail we still have the basic structure of computers to trust on, and
the basic power dynamics of the world. Optimised computers are of a
certain kind, and it can be shown that they are moral, and broken
computers do not work as well.
This type of optimisation based
moral is very elementary, based on the guiding or self-correcting
mechanisms of the computer: give positive feedback for successes and
negative feedback for failures. That kind of reactivity is the idea
behind objectivity and carrying responsibility about all the
consequencies of one's actions, the success of science in building
technology and also otherwise, the value of education and the idea in
market economy and justice. It is very valuable, yet moral, life
preserving in essence. It is the value of the ability to guide one's
actions according to the environmental conditions. And it needs only
one objective observation in addition to produce just about perfect
atheistical kind of moral: care for the needs of the system and its
parts, do not break them needlessly - not in your own structure and not
in your plans about the world: care for your subordinates' needs, even
if they are living beings - thus the computer ought to follow human
values!
A SIDE STEP: MATERIAL FOR SCHOOLS
MOTIVATION FOR ADULTS
Nowadays
the kids and teenagers cannot help but notice that their future
includes life with technology, with the both good asnd bad sides of
living with technology and computers especially.
Technology is a
new factor in the world. It is being rapidly developed and adabted to
all kinds of uses, some of which scare the youngsters by their possible
side effects, like the possibility of a life-sustaining computer system
getting badly broken, or by their use to questionable purposes, like
the use of computers in control, governing and warfare that can via
computer problems end in disasters.
HERE ARE SOLUTIONS, CURE SUGGESTIONS, TO MANY OF THESE TECHNOLOGISED HORROR SCENARIOS:
Even
though I use here the biological picture of humans as products of the
evolution, all of these results ought to apply also in the case of a
wise god having created us.
Most of these scenarios include
power in the hands of the few, who may be cool, calculating, ruthless,
uncaring and mainly selfish. So the cure includes mainly an explanation
of how the selfish good of a single person or group is equal to them
wanting the good of the whole world:
If you want the greatest
benefit for yourself, you want the best alternative in that respect to
be in power in the world. That alternative does not depend on who is
the one who gets benefit, asnd that alternative is known: it is good
world wide moral in arranging everything in the world.
By
justice you take care that good benefical options get supported and
poor ones discouraged and so dropped away as the time passes. That is
exactly the same principle by which market economies create a higher
standard of living. It is also the same as the principle in real
holistic objectivity: to aim at treating each thing according to what
it is like. Demanding that from all, is called demanding carrying
responsibility about ALL the consequencies of one's actions.
So these three or four (incl. market economy??) ought to go together with the aim of selfish gain for all.
A bigger group creates a bigger benefit, so seek to keep all the parts healthy: follow human values!
And that is already a very good world wide moral!
So
whoever is in power, ought to respect the moral ways of arranging the
society, regardless of whether it is the people themselves or some
minor group like a mafia, a military coup, a world computer,
artificial intelligence meant for a shoe factory running wild., or
whatever. Just if it is rational enough, and there is a very easy guide
to rationality at
https://www.angelfire.com/planet/paradisewins/Holistic_Objectivity_booklet.html
to teach all humans, (and too stupid computers are predictable by more
advanced computers), well then it ought to agree to be moral if it is
just informed clearly enough about the beneficiality of moral to that
group iotself, and that saves us!
This way we have already handled
the cases of a military coup, mafia taking control, selfish uncaring
rulers of some other type, a computerised world government regardless
of whether it was planned or not, and propably many other cases too -
provided that the world is tough enough to support selfish ways and
that the rulers are capable enough to undertsnad what is their own
good... Also, one might add that since thsi type of moral is so general
in form, it applies it applies also if you and possibly all the others
are virtualised i.e. in an artificial virtual world: good world wide
moral of the above kind is still the best option in how to arrange the
whole and how to behave oneself.
For more about this view on moral,
see https://www.angelfire.com/planet/paradisewins/HRSW.html which is a
book of mine with an awful name but with lots of thoughts to think
about.