ORIGINS OF THE SETTLEMENTS POLICY The settlements on the West Bank were designed for specific strategic reasons. A few of the settlement sites are associated with Talmudic references and are claimed by Jewish settlers as rightfully theirs as part of their Covenant with God. Most of them do not, however - their locations were selected for military and economic control reasons. The settlement plan was devised in 1977. After waiting some time to see it there would be international outrage at the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, the Israelis gauged that they could capitalize on the relative lack of western interest and on their complete military control of the region. The U.S. could be counted on to support, or at least not oppose, any action Israel might take. Ariel Sharon, together with several hardened veterans of the war, devised the settlement plan and Sharon himself drew the conceptual map. The plan was simple: to run settlements out in three control corridors deep into Arab territory and to build a "wall" of settlements along the borders with Israel, Jordan, Syria and Egypt. These "civilian" settlements would serve as bases for potential military actions but more importantly they would serve to control Palestinian development growth and economic potential. Sharon's plan for the West Bank, as is described here, was published as a report to the Knesset in 1977 under the title "A Vision For Israel in the 21st Century." As Defense Minister, as Housing Minister and now as Prime Minister he has stuck strictly to the plan as he described it in that document. Here in America, many people conceive of the settlements as a few isolated apartment blocks. In fact, every settlement is surrounded by a very large "township" controlled by the settler's group. Even larger areas are controlled by the Settlers Council and are reserved for future Jewish development (needless to say, the indigenous natives are strictly banned from these areas). Together with the smaller military bases and reservations, the amount of terrority of the West Bank controlled by the Israelis' is nearly 40%! (http://www.btselem.org/English/Publications/index.asp) Further, the roads for the settlers to travel back and forth to Israel would serve to cut the Arab areas into more easily controlled districts, thus allowing IDF control of all travel, commerce, economic growth etc. From the beginning there was strong international protest against the settlements including Europe, the U.N. and the rest of the world. Only the U.S. failed to attempt to stop them and even so, official U.S. policy from the beginning has been that the settlements are illegal, unnecessary and a major obstacle to peace. They are also a direct violation of the Geneva Convention, which states that no land of conquered territories can be confiscated, built on or settled by citizens of the conquering state (this addresses even the bellicose statements of Israeli supporters who trumpet that "we conquered the West Bank"). The Geneva Convention also states that no civilians shall be displaced nor shall any of their housing or businesses be destroyed. Since the Oslo Accord, 6,000 Palestinian homes have been bulldozed or demolished with explosives or artillery. 250,000 producing olive trees have been destroyed. (reference: Amesty International) The vast majority of Israeli military action against the Palestinians and civilian deaths have been as a result of defending and reinforcing these settlements (colonies) on the West Bank. It is safe to say that without the settlements, there would have been relatively little violence in the region in the last 30 years and most likely Israel and a Palestinian state would be living side by side in relative calm. This is not to say that there would be no violence or strife whatsoever, but the thousands of deaths, the oppression and all of the humiliations which serve only to breed future terroism, hatred and anti-Semitism would never have happened. For Sharon, the fundamental concept has always been a simple one an idea that has been with him since he was a child on his parents farm and carried a club with him to beat anyone he found "trespassing" on their land. His concept is simply to make life so unpalatable and unprofitable for Palestinian Arabs that they would leave "voluntarily," either for another Arab country, Europe or the U.S the precise strategy used by the Third Reich in 1938-39. This was in fact, a fundamental idea of the early Zionist movement (see quotes below.) Land confiscations, curfews, closures which prevent the vast majority of Palestinians from traveling to their jobs, economic strangulation, cutoff of trade with the outside world all of these work in accordance with this idea: get the Arabs out and take the land for Jews. The idea of Eretz Israel (greater Israel) reserves the land for Jews and Jews alone. Eretz Israel as defined by Gush Emunim (the settlers movement) extends from the Nile to the Euprhrates; according to their deeply felt beliefs, the extents of ancient Israel. Fundamental to their belief is the Talmudic prophecy that the Messiah cannot return until the Jews occupy all of Eretz Israel. QUOTES: THE ISRAELI VISION OF SETTLEMENTS POLICY (quoted at www.fmep.org - The Foundation For Middle East Peace)
Likud's policty repeatly emphasized that AT NO TIME are the national concerns of the indiginous people, nor their yearning for freedom are to be taken into account or mitigated in any way which interferes with official Israeli policy or the territorial aspirations of Gush Emunim, the settler's movement.
Gush Shalom: Barak Peace Plan (See this important site by an Israeli/Jewish peace group - absolutely essential information) |
.
.
..
.
.
.
.