|
Hoo boy! Why do I get the feeling your family "merged their dominions" one generation too many? |
|
You are one of the best examples of ignorance I have ever had the misfortune of reading
about. And worse yet, you are, like a true modern man, proud of your ignorance. If you
really want to know why in the past people were killed for criticizing the crown look no
further than your own disgusting website - it was because of obnoxious people like you
stirring up resentment against time-honoured morals and traditions that keep society
together. Further, I'll have you know that it was more often supporters of the Monarchy
like myself killing irritants like you than it was state sanctioned killings on behalf of
the crown. Sure, much better to have a head of State with that can exercise that kind of
political power directly. Why don't you try learning something about Canada before you
comment on our country? I guess while you were living here your time was too important
for you to stop watching fake wrestling on television and actually understand where you
were even living.
[SET BABBLING=SUSPEND] You're mad at me for questioning time-honored traditions? Here are some other practices that were once "time-honored" (yes, I spelled it without a "u") traditions: burning witches, slavery, prohibiting women from voting, making young children work in factories...need I go on? [SET BABBLING=CONTINUE] And criticizing the Monarchy for claiming to be Canadian when it is based abroad is sheer hypocrisy when you call yourself Canadian and are too based abroad. You sir are nothing more than a hypocrite, and a bad one at that. [SET BABBLING=SUSPEND] Geez, I'm sure getting a lot of hits for a bad hypocrite! Here's the difference between Liz and I. First, I was born in, and have lived the vast majority of my life in Canada. Another major difference between your ruler and myself is that when I claim the crown of Canada, I'll move back to assume my position. Rest assured, I certainly don't want to see guys like you running around without any leadership! It's quite obvious you need to be led... |
|
You are a traitor and will be hung, drawn through the streets of Westminster and quartered
outside Buckingham Palace if you set foot on our hallowed English shores you bear shagging,
ice eating colonial. Rule Brittania!
If the *elite* Brits had shagged bears instead of their cousins, maybe we wouldn't have the monarchy problem to begin with. |
|
You are a traitor to your country. You should be hung. I am hung. Thank you for noticing! |
|
Mocking your head of state for no good reason whatsoever is pretty
childish, but I doubt anything I say will change your warped opinion. No good reason? I suppose it makes perfect sense to you that the monarch of Canada not only isn't a native of that country, but doesn't even live on the same continent. Maybe you need to be led by an inbred family with a history of Nazi sypathizers and anti-Semites. If those are your chosen leaders then go! Follow away! But don't expect to find me in lock-[goose]step with you and your fellow brown shirts. That's all for now. I'll let you go get titillated with your Prince William knick knacks. |
|
Hang in public, the word "saboteur" carved in your chest. You want to kill me? You must be insane...are you sure you aren't related to royalty? |
|
May a swastika be carved DEEPLY into your body. Is that some of the Nazi sympathy that's well-documented in the royal family creeping out? I'm surprised you have time to send hate mail here...aren't you supposed to be invading Poland? |
|
You should be ashamed of yourself. HRH has served this country faithfully for her entire lifetime in the greatest calling imaginable.
I should be ashamed? Lizzy should be the one ashamed, suckling off the public teat of Canada to maintain her lavish lifestyle, while hundreds of thousands of Canadian children live in poverty. As for serving the Country, Lizzy has been in our country only 192 days of her life. Sounds like she's really interested in what goes on here. The reality is that Lizzy and the gang are interested in maintaining their lofty, unearned perch, not bettering your life. |
|
Aren't you afraid of what people with think of you? Yes, that's why I do this sort of thing. |
|
You obviously have no respect for your country. You should be stripped of your Canadian citizenship. Oh no! Please don't leave me here in the U.S.!!! I don't think I could survive many more years of good television, product selection, and true democracy! Seriously though, I should be stripped of my citizenship for questioning the legitimacy of a foreigner to be head of state of my native land? Sounds like somebody stripped you of common sense. |
|
You should be charged with treason. If you lived in Britain you'd either be in jail or the hospital by now.
If I lived in Britain, I'd kill myself! (Just kidding!) |
|
Your website is the single-most offensive on the Internet, and I vow that I will do my utmost to see it is removed. Be advised, I have already sent a letter to your internet service provider warning them of the offensive nature of your site. I hope they boot your pathetic ass off the web.
You wrote my American internet service provider complaining about my anti-monarchist website? Yeah, I'm sure they'll rush to remove it! In case you've forgotten, the Americans came to their senses about the monarchy back in 1776. As for being the most offensive site on the net, you really can't have looked that far. I did a quick search of the web and came up with THIS LINK. Looks like a perfect match for you. |
|
If this was the 1800's you'd be hanging from the gallows. If it was the 1700's you'd have been drawn and quartered. Exactly my point. The reason the monarchy has been so empowered for so many years was due to their reign of terror; denounce the crown and be killed. Pretty sad when violence is the only way you can protect your position. Of course, this is the lineage you so desperately want to follow. |
|
Nothing wrong with the queen!
Seriously, if the queen is got rid of, then so you plan to replace her with an elected
head of state? If so, then I feel it could be a mistake...the reason? Another level of
bureauracy, more red tape, slower passing of laws/bills/, not much reduced expense (you have to *pay* presidents, you know!) Er, we pay the queen's expenses whenever she graces us with her presence, even though she is one of the richest women in the world; this despite the fact that thousands of Canadian children live below the poverty line. We also pay her unelected representatives (governer generals, lieutenant governors, etc). And we'd be replacing one level of bureaucracy (an unelected, unaccountable do-nothing queen) with an elected level of representation. The babbling continues... In fact, having a head of state that *actually* has power is not that good a thing, it gives one person a lot of power, (rejecting bills/laws outright..as in USA, can't happen in the present system), so is not neccessarily the best option. You're not serious, right? Having an elected head of state is a bad thing? Maybe you'd be happier in a regime under somebody like Idi Amin. A president's powers are limited by both an electorate, and legislative bodies. Currently we have no way to overrule a ruling by the Queen. |
|
I would like to quote to you from the Orange Order of Canada. First of all, the
constitutional Monarch is the essence of our system of parliamentary democracy.
By standing above the day-to-day political strife, the Crown provides the stability
of the Nation, the guarantee of the continuity of government, while enabling a free
exchange of opinions within the context of an over-all consensus of national ethics.
So the queen is valuable because she's a political figure who doesn't get involved in politics? Sounds pretty useful to me. Maybe you'd like to go to a doctor who doesn't like to dabble in medicine. The rambling continues... Our cabinet is made up of Ministers of the Crown, responsible to the House of Commons. This makes possible the responsibility and accountability of the Government of the day for all its actions, continuous and not just at election time. It ensures the supremacy of the law--makes over the law-enforcers. And it preserves a viable alternative government always at hand should the existing cabinet lose the confidence of the House and the people. I NEVER want an unelected foreigner to have the final say over who our government is, especially during times of crisis. Canadians are, present company excepted, bright enough to handle our own internal affairs. |
|
By attacking Queen Elizabeth, you ignore the fact that she is an expression of national unity. In Canada, this is of particular significance. Being a widely dispersed, loosely-federated nation of many cultures and people, we find our focus in the Crown of Canada. Not only are ministers of the Crown responsible to the House of Commons in Ottawa, but there are ministers of the same Crown in every province's legislature. This enables the flexibility of federalism which brings the government closer to the people being governed, while at the same time ensuring national unity.
The Queen's responsible for national unity? Job well done! What are we on now, our fourth round of separatist governments in Quebec and a growing independence movement out west? It is quite obvious that QEII has had no positive effect on Canadian unity! She should have been thrown out years ago! |
