<html> <!--Generated by Angelfire: L04S00--> <head> <title>Grave Yard Orbs</title> </head> <body bgcolor="#000000" text="#ffffff" link="#00ff00" alink="#ffa500" vlink="#ff0000"> <basefont size="3"> <div align="center"> <!--Header--> <h1 align="center">Grave Yard Orbs</h1> <!--EndHeader--> <!--Freetext--><!--EndFreetext--> <p> <!--ImageGroup--> <img src="Watching.jpg"> <p> <font size="5"></font> <p> <!--Freetext-->I think orbs are always there, it's just a matter of catching them on film. Why do you need a camera to see them, I cannot say for sure but I have never seen them on any picture i've taken without hunting for them, go figure.<!--EndFreetext--> <!--EndImageGroup--> <p> <!--ImageGroup--> <img src="Ghostly_Mist.jpg"> <p> <font size="5"></font> <p> <!--Freetext-->An "ecto-mist" I've heard it called. Cigerette smoke is a good argument or fog lit up by a flash is another, but what gets me is the orbs within the mist and there is no defined streaks of smoke like a cigerette whould have made. And your opinion ?<!--EndFreetext--> <!--EndImageGroup--> <p> <!--ImageGroup--> <img src="An_Orb_Shot.jpg"> <p> <font size="5"></font> <p> <!--Freetext--> I read an article saying that digital camera's will leave spots unfinished in circular shapes as pictures are taken in blackness with a flash. Well I've seen too much to rely on that particular answer, this picture maybe, but browse this site and others to see that definately is not even possible for alot of orb shots, some in day and some at night, thats just not good enough for me.<!--EndFreetext--> <!--EndImageGroup--> <p> </div> </body> </html>