Total Film April 2001

Total Film April 2001

”I’m a convenient foil for a lot of people…”

By Matt Mueller and Alan Morrison

How many weddings during the ‘90s had the ghost of Kevin Costner as an uninvited guest? If Bryan Robin Hood Adams wasn’t warbling Everything I do (I do it for you), then Whitney The Bodyguard Houston was promising I will Always Love You as bride and groom took to the floor for the first dance. It’s an indication of Costner’s box office standing that songs from two of his movies should dominate the airwaves for so long (21 weeks at Number One between them).

But that was back in ’91 and ’92 when the boy from Lynwood, California could do no wrong. As the decade began he danced with wolves and waltzed off with seven Oscars, then questioned America’s ability to face the truth about the Kennedy assassination (JFK). Meanwhile, Robin Hood and The Bodyguard proved he could put money in the bank. The Kevin Costner wagon was on a roll.

Then came the spiraling budget of Waterworld, the critical mauling of The Postman and a very public divorce. Last year, he could only watch as he struck out on his third baseball movie (For Love of the Game) despite hitting two home runs back in the late ‘80s with Field of Dreams and Bull Durham. With his status as an A-Lister starting to look shaky, Costner assumed producer duties and found the ideal comeback. Thirteen Days is a tense account of 1962’s Cuban missile crisis which pitches Costner as Kenny O’Donnell: a real life political advisor to John F Kennedy and one cog in the White House machine as America and Russia go head to head over the Commies’ sneaky ply to station nuclear warheads on Castro’s island, just 90-miles from the Florida coast…

You’ve been involved with Thirteen Days as actor and producer for a long time-what made you feel so strongly about it?

You have to pick the stories that you want to be involved with, and the end game is you’d like to be a part of a hit. But I think your moral obligation is to follow your own heart, and when I read Thirteen Days, I as moved by it. It was just a great time for the world, in terms of looking back into history and seeing how we got ourselves into trouble and how we got ourselves out of trouble. And the kind of moral conviction it takes to get out of trouble sometimes.

What if something like this happened now with George W Bush as the man in the White House?

I don’t even know how to answer that to other than we, as a collective citizenry, have to pray that the men and women around him have a higher sense of calling. It sounds romantic, but what else do we have to lean on at this point? But I know what you're asking and I think it's always a question mark. If you look back in history, the other political players that could have been where Kennedy was -Nixon, Lyndon Johnson - I think they would not have reacted the way John Kennedy did. Kennedy chose negotiation, but those guys probably would have gone to war. We're a society - at least in America -in, which politicians do whatever to get re-elected, and a lot of decisions that were being made at that time by Kennedy were certain to not get him re-elected.

What are your own memories of the Cuban missile crisis as a seven year old in 1962?

I knew something was wrong, just the way my parents were deporting themselves. People in the neighborhood were building bomb shelters which, because I was really young, seemed like a really neat thing. They looked like forts to me, putting sleeping bags and food down there.

Kenny O’Donnell is not an instantly likeable character. Are you playing against type, trying to move away from that early wholesome image?

Sometimes to take the most interesting role might serve myself and the vanity of saying: "Hey, look ma, I can act." But it would be the wrong casting. It would not have been effective if I'd played John Kennedy in Thirteen Days. It would have been a splashy little turn, but as a producer, I can't just serve myself because it itches my acting bone.

So you're no longer afraid to not come across as unlikable on screen?

I think what's more important is that your character is understood. Kenny O'Donnell was no walk in the park, and he wasn't somebody who played the political game. His whole job was to protect John Kennedy - people had to go through his office to get to JFK - and that was enough for me. I felt like I needed to dress down so I dyed my hair. John Kennedy was a golden type of personality and I didn't need to compete with that.

It’s an ensemble movie - yet you stand back and let your co-stars shine.

I've, been around where I knew other actors were going to steal the scene, and I don't compete with them. When I played Robin Hood, I knew the great role was Alan Rickman's and it didn't bother me. I always think that leading actors should be called the best supporting actors because you're the only person that can support somebody like Alan and say: "Go for it this is great." Or you can be the opposite and say: "I don’t like what you're doing, you're too damn funny. Knock it off." And that’s not my way.

Were you hurt by stories that came out about you recutting Prince of Thieves because you thought Kevin Reynolds' cut wasn’t good?

There were things that the studio wanted - and they were not gonna necessarily be done by Kevin Reynolds.

What specifically did the studio want changed about the film?

They thought the relationship between Morgan Freeman and the Robin Hood character was stronger and funnier than Kev thought it was and they wanted to add some things back in. I didn't think they were wrong, but it wasn’t my choice. I never went into the editing room on that movie. I think they wanted to know my allegiance to Kevin - would I walk away if they wanted to try some things? And I wasn't going to because they'd put up a lot of money into it. I'm a pretty convenient foil for a lot of people.

Robin Hood was the second of three times you've worked with Kevin Reynolds

I think he's very talented. There's a question mark in a lot of people's minds but there’s never been one in mine. I mean, two of our movies made 800 million bucks between them. That's not my bottom line, but if it's a bottom line for the greatest majority of people in this business, they ought to wake up. If 1 thought a movie was really good and it didn't make a lot of money, it wouldn't phase me at all to work with those same people again because this is what I'm about - trying to make a good movie.

Which brings us to Waterwold

That movie took a beating. But, look, the studio, not Kevin, was behind most of the bad moves on Waterworld. Before we started shooting, I sat down with the heads of the studio and told them to their faces: "This movie is north of Terminator 2 numbers!" Terminator 2 cost like $129 million, and the eventual cost of Waterworld was around $150 million. They said it was a $99 million movie because they didn't want to be the first studio to green light a movie over $100 million. They didn't mind if they went over budget, but they didn't want the fact that they had okayed a budget of more than 100 million on their conscience. They continued to make decisions like that throughout the entire, movie. Waterworld needed to be massaged a little more. It was rushing towards a target release date and the things that Kevin wanted to fix, there just wasn't time. And it really got laid around my neck because, at a certain point, Kevin couldn't accept where they wanted to go. I wasn't an idiot, I knew when my friend stepped aside that the pressure would fall on me. The studio started the bloodbath and they knew they wouldn't be around to pick any of the pieces up. And they ultimately made a bunch of money. I read all the time that Waterworld was a total disaster - but it made almost 400 million bucks around the world. It was incredibly profitable for them.

JFK was a movie that rocked the boat at the time

I thought JFK was the movie of the year, quite honestly. I know Silence Of The Lambs won the Best Picture 0scar in 1991, but I thought Oliver Stone really made the movie of the year. I wasn't nominated on any level for JFK so we knew the handwriting was on the wall.

Stone came in for a lot of flack. What about yourself?

I did, because people don't really know my political bent - some people think I'm very conservative and then they realize I'm actually not. Oliver thought I was really conservative and found out I wasn't, but it helped his cause because he knew he was gonna be flying in the face of all these conservatives. I got some death threats over the movie. But our version of history was much closer to the version that happened because everything else I've read on it just doesn't add up.

Why so many sports movies? Are you a jock?

I enjoy sports. I get a real joy from playing sports but I don't look for those movies. Oliver Stone wanted to know if I would do Any Given Sunday and it just didn't appeal to me.

So, out of all your sports movies, which would you say is your favorite?

I don't want to speak for your country, but in mine Field, Of Dreams is probably our generation's It's A Wonderful Life.

There was a big break between you directing Dances With Wolves and The Postman.

I didn't feel the need to do anything else. I don't feel the need to direct. I tried to get other people to direct Dances, but they wouldn't do it. They all thought it was too long. One director wanted to cut the Civil War sequence. Another thought the white woman was very clichéd and should be an Indian. And I said: "Well, then I don't have a story because it's about a language barrier and the white woman helps break it." They were both very famous directors. At the end of the day, I thought if it's going to be wrecked, I want to make sure I wreck it. I wasn't at all sure that I would actually pull it off, but I was certain I wouldn't change it.

And you were vindicated by its success.

That's one vindication, and if that’s the only one you have, then you're going to be disappointed, because I liked The Postman. The Postman was assaulted, but I get a lot of great letters about it, I really do. So I can't spit on that movie because everyone else does or wants me to because it didn’t make money. I mean, they released that movie the same day Titanic came out. What's that about? One person doesn't have to shoulder all the responsibility for why a film does or doesn't do well.

So you don't feel you personally got blamed for The Postman's bad reception?

I think blame is too strong a word. What are we blaming? Is this Vietnam? We made a movie, it didn't make much money. I'm gonna be really happy if somebody watches it in 10 years' time and really enjoys it. I've never done a film for paycheque, I've never done one to fill a time slot and I've never done on to take care of an alimony payment.

Is there a kind of film or director you haven't worked with who you'd like to?

I wanted very much to do Traffic and at one point it looked like I was going to work on it. And then, of course, Catherine Zeta-Jones has her relationship with Michael Douglas and it suddenly didn't happen. So, I'd like to work with Soderbergh. And Scorsese. And I like working with first time directors. Kevin Reynolds was a first time director, as were Ron Shelton and Demian Liechtenstein who I just did 3,000 Miles to Graceland with. I haven't tried to buffer myself I like rolling the dice.

There was talk of a Bodyguard sequel with Princess Diana. Is that still on the cards?

I do think about doing it. We got a rewrite and it's not bad. But we wrote it with Di in mind, and of course the tragedy happened so it lost a lot of steam for me. It was written to protect her - it wasn't going to be taxing on her acting. That was my number one obligation that she come off good. It's hard for me to think about it without thinking of her.