Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« June 2008 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
comedy
Days of Jeff's Life
election news
family
food
government issues
holidays
media
Nature Minutes
paranormal
random
sports
travel
You are not logged in. Log in
Common Sense
Sunday, 29 June 2008
Weekend Update
Topic: random
Hot hot hot! 80's and 90's today. Heather and Alicia went swimming in the lake. We had hot dogs, chicken, and steak on the grill. Everything was grilled to perfection. Our plan for today was a cruise across the lake on the peddleboat. After draining the water from inside, the rudder kept coming loose. All the boat did was spin in circles. No cruise for us. Later today we'll let Lucy swim in the smaller lake, set back in the woods.

Posted by Josh at 1:09 PM PDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Saturday, 28 June 2008
Baseball Fever- Catch It!
Topic: sports

It must be June. The phirst place Phillies are in a phree phall. It's almost an annual tradition in Philly. This year's edition has a catch- the rest of the division is so underachieving they haven't caught up yet. I predict the Braves will be on top by August.

A few days ago I saw Shawn Chacon of the Astros got into some deep doodoo for choke-slamming his GM. Naturally, I was upset and I hoped he would get the most severe punishment allowed by law. Then I read the story and saw the GM was Ed Wade, who formerly held the same position with the Phillies. Instantly my thought changed to "Finally! Someone did it!" As a Phillies fan, I myself wanted to choke the man for years. His signature move was to trade for a 38 year old relief pitcher at the deadline as his way of pushing a team that was just a few games back.

If you're a fan of the TriCounty League in PA, there's a bit of a shake-up. First, the old Milford team got kicked out of the league for using an illegal player last year. No doubt they pulled a guy off the street when they only had 8 of their own players show for a game. Too bad for the rest of league- there go 3 or 4 easy wins. Next, we have the Northern Yakees atop the standings, a place usually reserved for Gabelsville, Limeport, and the Fleetwings. What's next, a win for the Sox?


Posted by Josh at 10:54 AM PDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Friday, 27 June 2008
I'm throwing away my vote this year

I’m throwing away my vote this year. And you should too. I know it’s only June and there’s still almost 4 months until the election but I’ve decided NOT to vote for any of the following, and I’ll state my reasons: Chuck Baldwin, Bob Barr, John McCain, Ralph Nader, and Barak Obama.

 

First: Chuck Baldwin, Constitution Party. Pastor Chuck is a wonderful, upstanding guy. But he won’t get my vote. Despite my strong belief in the Constitution and my desire for the government to try following it, I can’t vote for Pastor Chuck. I looked into the CP and their party platform is too Bible-thumping. I have nothing against Jesus, but there are more than just Christians in this country and they seem to want a return to the Constitution without the separation of church and state.

 

Second: Bob Barr, Libertarian Party.  A favorite among Ron Paulites, Bob Barr loses my vote for 2 reasons. First, he spent too many years pushing the war on drugs, which is ineffectual and cost-inefficient (another story for another time). Then, he voted in favor of the Patriot Act, a virtual death sentence for the Bill of Rights. He claims to have changed his positions, but is he really a neo-con tool for taking over the LP?

 

Third: John McCain, Republican Party. Barring a minor- OK, major miracle, Mighty Mac will get the party’s nomination in September. Despite underwhelming support. Why not vote for him? Where to start! Tops on my list is he pretty much guarantees a 3rd term for Bush. Then there’s the campaign finance issue. He doesn’t seem to understand a law he himself wrote. He opted for matching public campaign funds, which gave him automatic ballot access in all 50 states. Then he withdrew so he wouldn’t be limited in how much money he could raise. But stayed on the ballot in all 50 states. Lazy mo-fo. He touts his leadership experience. Do we want as our leader a man who is thus far the ONLY American NAVAL officer ever to be captured by GROUND forces? Do we want as our leader someone who sings “Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran”? That sounds funny coming from a stand-up comedian but from someone who wants to be President? What kind of message does that send to the world?

 

Fourth: Ralph Nader, Independent candidate. Ever see a Corvair? Want to know who killed it? Look no further than consumer advocate Ralph Nader. His book “Unsafe at Any Speed” destroyed the Corvair. It was based on lies. I don’t want a nanny-stater for President. Plus, don’t you think he’s run enough times to know how to win?

 

Fifth: Barak Obama, Democratic Party. In the epic battle of Clueless vs. Evil, Clueless came out on top. I guess there are more clueless people than evil in this country. If you’ve ever heard Barak Obama speak, you fall into one of two categories: either you love his message or you’re still waiting to hear it. He combines the energetic speech of Martin Luther King with the charisma of John F Kennedy to captivate audiences but manages to say nothing of substance. He offers us “change” and “hope”. Change what? Hope for what? Hope for change? I question his dedication to America. Wearing a flag pin is just a gesture, but he refuses to do it. He doesn’t cover his heart for the Pledge of Allegiance. He spent 25 years listening to anti-American sermons at his church yet knew nothing about the content. Oh, and let’s not forget his legislative accomplishments. What are they? No one seems to know. But as a Democrat, you know he HAS to be a socialist.

 

Having said all that, the obvious winner of the election will be either McCain or Obama. So if you like to vote based on who is more likely to win, pick one of those. But if you vote correctly, voting for the best candidate, sadly, you won’t have that option this year. As far as I’m concerned there is once again no one worth voting for.

 

 So, you wonder, how am I throwing my vote away? Laugh if you want to, but I am writing in Ron Paul. Yes, the weird, crazy nutty guy. Wait, he can’t be that out there if I’m the smartest guy you know and I’m voting for him. So why isn’t he getting the Republican nomination this year? Because we like paying income taxes, we love the national debt, we want open borders, Iraqis love us, Iran is inviting us over for tea, the government isn’t big enough or doing enough for us, and we wipe our asses on the Constitution.


Posted by Josh at 8:47 AM PDT
Updated: Friday, 27 June 2008 3:14 PM PDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Thursday, 26 June 2008
The Supremes get it right!
Topic: government issues
Today the Supreme Court ruled that yes, you do have the right to bear arms. Finally, some good news from the same court that ruled that the government can take your home and let developers have it. The Washington, DC ban on handguns has been struck down. The Bill of Rights was written in 1790 and the Second Amendment has been the most debated in the 20th century. Until recently no one gave gun ownership a second thought. But now with murders going on all over the place and a police state looming, are guns all they're cracked up to be? First let's look at the Second Ammendment itself. "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Some take this to mean that only militia members (law enforcement and national guard) should have guns. Others only look at the second half- the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Go back to 1790 with me for a second. What is the 1790 definition of "militia"? Every able-bodied male 16-64. Why do these folks need to be armed? The ever-looming threat of Indian attack, maybe pirates, or a slave uprising. Who knows, maybe the British will change their minds on that whole Treaty of Paris thing. Back to the future. Are any of these concerns still valid? No, I hope not. But does that mean we should all give up our guns? No. The police-staters would like that. But then all the guns would be in the hands of either the police, or the criminals. I'm not taking my chances on the police protecting me. They don't usually show up until after a crime. Instead of "protecting" everyone by getting rid of guns (if you're a criminal, why would stop shy of breaking the "you can't have a gun" law if it doesn't bother you to steal or kill?) I say get more guns out there! Sure there will be a bunch of idiots shooting everything that moves but I think crime will go down. Who wants to rob someone who might have an even bigger gun? The Virginia Tech shooting is a prime example of why everyone should carry a gun. If the whole campus was armed do you think he would've killed over 30 people? Writing for the minority, (in)Justice Stephen Breyer said, "In my view, there is simply no untouchable constitutional right guaranteed by the Second Amendment to keep loaded handguns in the house in crime-ridden urban areas." Why not? Don't we have a right to self-defense? Maybe he'd like to live a block away from the Capitol WITHOUT a gun and see how long until he changes his mind. Your thoughts?

Posted by Josh at 5:54 PM PDT
Post Comment | View Comments (1) | Permalink | Share This Post
Name that site
I'm having a contest to come up with a new name for this blog and website. The Doghouse just isn't working for me anymore. Submit your ideas and the whoever comes up with the best name wins........something. If I get a couple suggesions I like I'll put it to a vote. Speaking of voting, did you vote for President on the main page yet?

Posted by Josh at 1:10 PM PDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Ever meet someone like this?
Topic: Days of Jeff's Life
One of the residents here at Camp Lakeview (henceforth known as "DQ", short for Drama Queen) is always getting himself into some sort of trouble. He doesn't grasp unintended consequences. Well, lately he's been wanting to get his kid a pet. So one day last week a dude I work with here was walking along and DQ pulls up next to him in his car. The kid is carrying on about something, but it sounded like DQ asked if he wanted some chicken. So the Dude asked what kind- BBQ, fried, ya know. DQ says they're all white. The Dude starts thinking white meat. So then DQ says he has 3 or 4 of them. THEM? So the Dude looks in the back seat and sees a box with a cover on it and some holes poked in it. DQ says he has to get rid of the chickens because the ammonia smell in his camper is driving him nuts. He honestly thought chickens would make a good house pet. As DQ always says, "You try to do something nice for someone..."

Posted by Josh at 10:48 AM PDT
Post Comment | View Comments (2) | Permalink | Share This Post
Wednesday, 25 June 2008
How hot do you like your coffee?
Topic: government issues
A few weeks ago I came across a news item. Here in the Puget Sound area the big thing is coffee. Served by scantily clad women. Well, this news item went on to state that there is a particular scantily clad women as coffee servers place nearby that was getting some complaints. There was a protest going on there that weekend, and the folks wanted the city of Bonney Lake to do something about these scantily clad women. From what I heard, it sounded like the issue was girls in bikinis. The solution was to have City Council come up with an ordinance that would require a dress code of some sort. Back the truck up, I said. The city can't enforce a dress code on private property. Next you won't bele to wear your bikini to the pool. Or purple shirts on Wednesday. So I went to the top for some answers. I emailed the mayor of Bonney Lake, Neil Johnson for his take. What I found out was shocking. According to Mayor Johnson the issue wasn't bikinis at all. It wasn't even this particular espresso stand. Rather, on the other side of town another espresso stand's baristas were outside wearing pasties. Espresso stand #1 just opened right as the controversy was brewing and folks from out of town were the ones taking issue there. What it all boils down to, according to Mayor Johnson, is "The concern of the City is not with bikinis but with the wearing of pasties over the nipple/areola area. We are not looking to legislate clothing of the baristas, but to determine if pasties are worn by a barista, should that be in an adult entertainment zone, is that considered nudity or is it allowed? When the bottom half of the breasts are exposed, what is that to be considered?" I'm all for less government interference on all levels, but if it becomes necessary to enter an adult entertainment zone to get coffee in Bonney Lake, I find no fault with the city this time.

Posted by Josh at 10:50 AM PDT
Updated: Wednesday, 25 June 2008 1:21 PM PDT
Post Comment | View Comments (2) | Permalink | Share This Post
Tuesday, 24 June 2008
Farewell, George
Topic: comedy
Well, here's a truibute to George Carlin. Maybe the funniest guy I never met. He had a unique way of telling it like it is and still make you laugh. I salute hit for having the guts to take on the federal government over his 7 words. Would that we were all brave enough. Reading the story about his death I came across some pretty crazy stories about his life. George, you became the first person to die and make me laugh. I guess your work here is done. Now I can't wait to hear what kind of stories you have about meeting God.

Posted by Josh at 1:26 PM PDT
Updated: Tuesday, 24 June 2008 5:02 PM PDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Tuesday, 1 January 2002
Pipe Bombs and Piracy
null

Posted by Josh at 1:00 AM PST
Updated: Saturday, 19 July 2008 1:55 PM PDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Golf Cart Update
null

Posted by Josh at 1:00 AM PST
Updated: Saturday, 19 July 2008 1:54 PM PDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post

Newer | Latest | Older