NASA extends TIMED mission for fourth time
November 5, 2010
M.A.Padmanabha Rao's
SIX FUNDAMENTAL PHYSICS DISCOVERIES
IN A SINGLE PAPER
Professor of Medical Physics, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Jolly Grant, Uttaranchal, India (2001) Head, Radiation Safety Group & Deputy Director (Sc.E), Defence Laboratory, Jodhpur , Rajasthan(1983-‘97) Lecturer in Medical Physics , Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi (1964-1983). Current Address: 114 Charak sadan, Vikaspuri, New Delhi 110018, India raomap@yahoo.com Delhi Ph: (M) +91- 9871257964 |
Essentially, my research work claims two more emissions from radioisotopes and XRF sources by a previously unknown atomic phenomenon :
M A Padmanabha Rao,
UV dominant optical emission newly detectedfrom radioisotopes and XRF sources,
Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 40, no. 1, March 2010,
http://www.sbfisica.org.br/bjp/files/v40_38.pdf
Abstract of the paper in Wikipedia:
M. A. Padmanabha Rao Charak Sadan, Vikaspuri, New Delhi
110018, India (Received on 21 ... Retrieved from
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Raomap" ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Raomap-
Abstract
The current paper reports first and definite experimental evidence for γ-, X-, or β radiation causing UV dominant optical radiation from (1) radiochemicals such as 131 I; (2) XRF sources such as Rb XRF source present as salts; and (3) metal sources such as 57 Co, and Cu XRF sources. Due to low quantum yield a need arose to develop two techniques with narrow band optical filters, and sheet polarizers that helped in the successful detection of optical radiation. The metal 57 Co spectrum observed at room temperature hinted that it could be optical emission from excited 57 Co atoms by a previously unknown phenomenon. In order to explain UV emission, it was predicted that some eV energies higher than that of UV, termed temporarily as Bharat radiation are generated within the excited atom, while γ-, X-, or β radiation passes through core-Coulomb field. In turn, the Bharat energy internally produced within the excited atom causes UV dominant high-energy spectrum by valence excitation. As excited atoms become free from surrounding unexcited atoms by valence excitation, room temperature atomic spectra of solid radioisotopes and XRF sources became a possibility. It implies existence of temporary atomic state of solids. The experimental evidence that γ-, X-, and β radiations causing UV dominant optical emission from within excited atoms of radioisotopes suggests the possibility for solar γ-, X-, and β radiations causing EUV by the atomic phenomenon described here.
The current research took nearly 21 years: 9 yrs at the Defence Laboratory, Jodhpur from 1988 to until retirement in September 1997, and 12 yrs afterwards until publication in March 2010.
Possibly, doing six fundamental discoveries by an individual could be a new world record in entire science in last 100 years.
The paper accounts three experimental physics discoveries :
The current work represents previously unexplored area of sub-atomic research using two types of ionizing radiation sources: (1) radioisotopes and (2) XRF sources. Radioisotopes and X-ray fluorescent (XRF) sources come under the common category of ionizing radiation sources, yet their production process differs much from each other. Secondly, the phenomena causing gamma, beta, and alpha emissions from radioisotopes differ entirely from that of continuous X-rays from X-ray tubes or characteristic X-rays from XRF sources. That is why radioisotopes and (2) XRF sources are considered here as two distinctly different typesof ionizing radiation sources.
A surprise finding, Rb XRF source (AMC 2084, U.K.) showing 125,381 cps instead of the expected 8,800 Rb X-ray photon yield sec-1 steradian-1 led to this exhaustive study. In the absence of prior theory or any experimental study on the subject, further experiments suggested a possibility of optical radiation with low quantum yield from the source. Accordingly, the two optical techniques specially designed and developed for low light yield doubly ensured optical radiation from the Rb XRF source as well as from other XRF sources and radioisotopes tested.
What are the Six Fundamental Discoveries claimed in Brazilian paper
The first experimental discovery
UV dominant optical emission from radioisotopes present as radiochemicals.This comes under the category of 'fundamental physics discovery' since light emission from artificially produced radioisotopes was never reported by previous scientists ever since their discovery nearly a century ago. The insight is significant to nuclear physics as important as the discoveries of gamma, X-ray, or beta radiation. The insight is significant to nuclear physics as important as the discoveries of gamma, X-ray, or beta radiation.
The second experimental discovery
UV dominant optical emission from XRF sources present as salts.The Variable Energy XRF source AMC 2084 obtained from Nuclear Enterprises (U.K.) of the size of a lemon led to two discoveries. This is the second 'fundamental physics discoverysince on a macroscopic scale, the newly detected optical radiation was not known previously from XRF sources ever since the discovery of characteristic X-rays by C.G.Barkla or from X-ray tubes used in hospitals, ever since the discovery of continuous X-rays by W.C. Roentgen, nearly a century ago. However, the author has detected UV dominant optical emission following characteristic X-ray emission from one and the same excited atoms of Rb, Ba, and Tb XRF sources present as Rb, Ba, and Tb salts in AMC 2084,U.K.
The Brazilian paper included in References of the website below
X-ray fluorescence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Jump to: navigation,
search ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_fluorescence-
Cached -
Similar
|
|
Two experimental discoveries in physics were made from Variable Energy X-ray source (AMC 2084, U.K.):
|
For the first time, it is shown how photomultiplier tube 9635QB THORN EMI can detect UV dominant optical radiation from radioisotopes and XRF sources. The XRF source (AMC 2084):was kept directly kept on the quartz window of bare photo multiplier tube (9635QB THORN EMI). |
The third experimental discovery
UV dominant optical emission from metals at room temperature when present as radioisotopes or XRF sources
Metals emitting light at room temperature could be the most revolutionary experimental finding unprecedented in the history of science. Optical emission was detected from Cobalt metal when present as 57Co (Amersham International, U.K.); 60Co used in cancer treatment; and also from Cu, Mo, and Ag metals present as Cu, Mo, and Ag XRF sources of AMC 2084,U.K.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao’s groundbreaking experiments with radioisotopes and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) sourcesat the Defence Laboratory, Jodhpur, Rajasthan State, India led to three unexpected findings, fundamental significance to X-ray physics, nuclear physics and atomic spectroscopy. He has reported definite experimental evidence for γ-, X-, or β radiation causing UV dominant optical radiation from radioisotopes present as radiochemicals such as 137Cs, (2) Rb, Ba, and Tb XRF sources (AMC 2084, U.K.) present as salts, and (3) metal sources 57Co, and Cu, Mo, and Ag XRF sources notably at room temperature. These insights hinted that γ-, X-, or β radiation causes optical emission from within the one and the same excited atoms of both radioisotopes and XRF sources by a previously unknown atomic phenomenon.
In order to explain these three experimental breakthroughs, previously unexplored area of sub-atomic research into excited atoms of rdaioisotopes and XRF sources was made that led into the three following sub-atomic discoveries:
The Fourth Discovery (the predicted Bharat radiation) :
Sub-atomic research with radioisotopes and XRF sources led to an understanding that the UV dominant optical emission is the second generation of γ-, X-, and β emissions within the excited atom. That is why the first generation, implying an unprecedented emission from these sources that causes the optical emission has been conceptualized as follows. In order to explain optical emission, it was predicted that ionizing radiation first produce electromagnetic radiation with energy slightly higher than that of the detected UV radiation from within an excited atom. These wavelengths shown to exist in between X-ray and optical spectra of electromagnetic spectrum can not be called as X-rays or light say from Rb XRF source. That is why these wavelengths are termed as 'Bharat radiation' for convenience. Location of such wavelengths 12.87 to 47.488 nm generated by Rb X-rays of Rb XRF source fall in between Rb X-ray and UV dominant atomic spectra in Electromagnetic Spectrum. Like γ-rays and X-rays, Bharat radiation thus finds a place in the Electromagnetic Spectrum. The currently available photomultiplier tubes fail to efficiently detect these Bharat wavelengths.
The Fifth Discovery
While the basic atomic spectra of a salt is produced on heating it from an external thermal source, Bharat energies generated internally within excited atom causing new class of ‘Atomic Spectra of solids at room temperature’ never known since the inception of atomic spectroscopy could be fifth breakthrough in physics. The published paper has demonstrated that metallic 57cobalt source emit atomic spectrum at room temperature following gamma emission from one and the same excited cobalt atoms. Valence excitation by Bharat radiation set the excited atoms free from surrounding unexcited atoms. A new atomic state of solids comprising of all those free atoms seems to be responsible for the typical spectra observed.
UV dominant optical emission from radioisotopes and XRF sources may find a Place in the list of γ-, X-, and β emissions
Of all these insights, the optical emission detected at room temperature from metal 57Co is the most noteworthy. The γ- ray first produces some energy higher than that of UV at eV level within the same excited metal 57Co atom, termed Bharat radiation, which in turn causes the UV dominant optical emission.
The sixth Discovery :
New atomic phenomenon explaining how gamma, X-ray or beta successively causes two generations: Bharat radiation followed by UV dominant optical emission within an excited atom can be the sixth discovery.
(1) Ionizing radiation, particularly γ-, X-, or β radiation energy at keV or MeV level loses energy at eV level while passing through a core-Coulomb field. The loss of energy is reproduced as electromagnetic radiation (Bharat radiation) with the same energy at eV level but higher than that of UV or EUV that the source emits.
(2) The Bharat energy caueses valence excitation resulting into UV dominant atomic spectrum. Core- Coulomb interaction of γ-, X-, or β radiation is the notable feature in this atomic phenomenon.
Key words OF BRAZILAN PAPER
Dark radiation, Bharat radiation, Radiation dose data, Nuclear Medicine patients, radiopharmaceuticals, 99m-Tc, 131-I, 201-Tl, diagnostic X-ray tubes, skin erythema, Teletherapy treatment, Dark matter, fission fragments, solar flare, Uranium fission in Sun, activation products, 56-Co, and 24-Na in solar flare , Solar EUV emission, γ-, X-, β, UV, VIS, and NIR radiation emissions, radioisotopes, XRF sources, solar flares, solar γ-, X-, or β radiations, solar EUV, room temperature, new atomic phenomenon, atomic spectroscopy, UV, VIS, NIR radiations, sheet polarizers, narrow band optical filters, AMC 2084, Thorn/ EMI 9635 QB, gamma ray spectrometer, electromagnetic spectrum, core electron, core excitation, valence excitation, core coulomb space, fluorescent emission, luminescence, incandescence.
Papers presented on UV dominant optical emission from radioisotopes and XRF sources
1. M A Padmanabha Rao, (1997) ATOMIC EMISSION OF LIGHT FROM SOURCES OF IONIZING RADIATION BY A NEW PHENOMENON, Technical Report No: DLJ/ IL/ 97/ 7 of the Defence Laboratory (Defence Research and Development Organizaion, Ministry of Defence, Government of India) Jodhpur 342011, Rajasthan, India, April 1997). https://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/technicalreport.html ( The official Technical Report of the Defence Laboratory (Defence Research and Development Organization, Ministry of Defence, Government of India), Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India claimed the discovery of New Atomic Phenomenon in 1997. The research work was first released as an Official Technical Report of the Laboratory, after formal approval by the then Director in 1997, who also has been an Expert in Internal Dosimetry on Radiopharmaceuticals of International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria. )
PERSONAL [This official Report on the discovery of New Atomic Phenomenon attracted the Indian Dailies in April 1997.
https://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/hindu.html
https://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/hindustantimes.html
https://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/tribune.html
https://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/dainikbhaskar1997.jpg (in HINDI)
https://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/economictimes.html]
2. M A Padmanabha Rao, (1997)LIGHT EMISSION OBSERVED FROM IONIZING RADIATION SOURCES BY AN ATOMIC PHENOMENON, National Symposium on Contemporary Physics, November 6-8, 1997, organized by The Indian Physics Association , at Physics Department, Presidency College, Kolkata, India, https://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/kolkata.html
3. .M A Padmanabha Rao, (1998) RADIOISOTOPES AND X-RAY SOURCES EMIT FLUORESCENT LIGHT BY AN ATOMIC PHENOMENON, Proceedings of the 12th National Symposium on Radiation Physics, (Eds. P K Bhatnagar et al), Sponsored by Indian Society for Radiation Physics, Defence Laboratory, Jodhpur 342011, India, pp 273-276, and January 28-30 (Publisher: Hindustan Enterprises, Jodhpur 342003, Rajasthan, India). https://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/jodhpur1998.html
4 M A Padmanabha Rao(1998) X-RAY
SOURCEEMITS NOT ONLY X-RAYS BUT ALSO LOW ENERGY
ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION.
Citation:
The effects of ultra-low dose β-radiation on the physical properties of human erythrocyte membranes,
Zhirnov, Victor V. 1; Khyzhnyak, Svetlana V. 2; Voitsitskiy, Vladimir M. 2
International Journal of Radiation Biology, Volume 86, Number 6, June 2010, pp.499-506 (8). http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/apl/trab/2010/00000086/00000006/art00008
Citation: Report of the Seventh meeting of the Ozone Research Managers of the Parties to the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), Geneva, 18 to 21 May 2008 (organized by the Ozone Secretariat of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) together with the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), REPORT No. 51, WMO/TD-No. 1437, p. 178 http://ozone.unep.org/Meeting_Documents/research-mgrs/7orm/7orm-report.pdf
6. M A Padmanabha Rao, DISCOVERY OF LIGHT
EMISSION FROM XRF SOURCES,
[Citation: Enhanced response of the fricke solution doped with hematoporphyrin under X-rays irradiation,
Authors: Carlos Austerlitz1, Vivianne Lúcia Bormann de Souza, Diana Maria Tavares Campos, Cristina Kurachi, Vanderley Bagnato2, and Cláudio Sibata,
Journal: Braz. arch. biol. technol. 51, n.2, p. 271, Mar./Apr. 2008. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/babt/v51n2/a06v51n2.pdf
7. M A Padmanabha Rao, (2002) ROOM TEMPERATURE ATOMIC SPECTRA FROM SOLID RADIOISOTOPES AND XRF SOURCES, Presented in 34 Conference of European Group for Atomic Spectroscopy , Department of Physics, Sofia University, Sofia, Bulgaria, 2002, Editor: K.Blagoev, Institute of Sold State Physics, Europhysics Conference Abstracts, Oral Paper F2-4, p.103 https://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/egas34.html
8. M A Padmanabha Rao, NEW UV EMITTERS: RADIOISOTOPES AND XRF SOURCES EXPLAINED BY FIRST MAPPING OF PHOTON, ELECTRON, PROTON AND NEUTRON. (in)Advances in Electronic Materials and Devices, (Eds) Prof. P.K. Bajpai, Dr.H.S.Tiwari, and Dr.A.Khaskalam, Department of Pure & Applied Physics, Guru Ghasidas University, Bilaspur 495009, Chattisgarh State, India. https://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/bilasspur.pdf
9 M.A. Padmanabha Rao, Invited Paper. SOLAR X-RAYS, GAMMA RAYS, AND ELECTRONS CAUSE EUV BY A PREVIOUSLY UNKNOWN ATOMIC PHENOMENON in Proceedings of the 7 th International Conference on Human Ecology and Nature (HEN2008), Moscow-Ples , Russia, 2008, edited by Vladimir V.Zaitsev (Moscow Scientific and industrial Association “Radon”) p.45. https://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/Solarfission.html
THE FOLLOWING WEBSITES ACCEPTED THESE AS LATEST FUNDAMENTAL PHYSICS DISCOVERIES
Posted on: January 7, 2010 9:50 AM, by Chad Orzel
LATEST FUNDAMENTAL PHYSICS
DISCOVERIES.
My comment is on your sentense, "In the large accelerator
era, I wonder if we don't need to make a distinction between
"basic research" and what we might as well call "fundamental
research" (though that term kind of bugs me for other
reasons)". Money spent for this work was very limited that is
for a Gamma ray Spectrometer, radioisotopes and XRF sources.
Anyone who does fundamental research has to devote several
years. The research study lasted nearly 21 years from the
begining (1988) to publishing (March 2010.
The website
http://en.giswiki.net/wiki/User_talk:Raomap
is a key ro explain what are the Six Fundamental Physics
Discoveries in the paper published in a peer reviewed journal:
PADMANABHA RAO, M. A..
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from radioisotopes
and XRF sources.
Braz. J. Phys. [online]. 2010, vol.40, no.1, pp. 38-46. ISSN
0103-9733.
[doi: 10.1590/S0103-97332010000100007.] [1]
http://www.sbfisica.org.br/bjp/files/v40_38.pdf
1. The FIRST EXPERIMENTAL DISCOVERY : UV dominant optical emission from radioisotopes present as radiochemicals.
2. The SECOND EXPERIMENTAL DISCOVERY : UV dominant optical emission from XRF sources present as salts.
3. The THIRD EXPERIMENTAL DISCOVERY : UV dominant optical emission from metals at room temperature when present as radioisotopes or XRF sources.
4. The FOURTH DISCOVERY : Bharat radiation (predicted).
5. The FIFTH DISCOVERY: Bharat radiation causing a new class
of Atomic Spectra of solids (solid radioisotopes and XRF
sources) at room temperature.
These Atomic Spectra of solids could be significant
breakthrough in the history of atomic spectroscopy.
6. The SIXTH DISCOVERY: Previously unknown atomic phenomenon explaining how Bharat radiation, the first generation of gamma, X-ray, and beta, and UV dominant optical emission the second generation takes place from from one and the same excited atom in radioisotopes and XRF sources.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao, PhD
Former Professor of Medical Physics, New Delhi, India
raomap@yahoo.com
http://www.suite101.com/content/physics-in-canada-ernest-rutherford-a65646
Aug 24, 2008 Susanna McLeod
Guest :
LATEST FUNDAMENTAL PHYSICS DISCOVERIES AFTER
RUTHERFORD
My research work is further progress to Rutherford's
findings on beta made nearly a century ago. "Ru
therford made great leaps in progress
at McGill. Using Becquerel Rays, a method of ionization found
in 1896, Rutherford’s immediate
findings in Canada were the
non-penetrating alpha and penetrating beta rays."
The website
http://en.giswiki.net/wiki/User_talk:Raomap
is a key ro explain what are the Six Fundamental
Physics Discoveries in the paper published in a peer
reviewed journal:
PADMANABHA RAO, M. A.. UV dominant optical emission newly
detected from radioisotopes and XRF sources.
Braz. J. Phys. [online]. 2010, vol.40,
n.1, pp. 38-46. ISSN 0103-9733.
[doi: 10.1590/S0103-97332010000100007.] [1]
http://www.sbfisica.org.br/bjp/files/v40_38.pdf
1. The FIRST EXPERIMENTAL DISCOVERY : UV dominant optical emission from radioisotopes present as radiochemicals.
2. The SECOND EXPERIMENTAL DISCOVERY : UV dominant optical emission from XRF sources present as salts.
3. The THIRD EXPERIMENTAL DISCOVERY : UV dominant optical emission from metals at room temperature when present as radioisotopes or XRF sources.
4. The FOURTH DISCOVERY : Bharat radiation (predicted).
5. The FIFTH DISCOVERY: Bharat radiation causing a new class of Atomic Spectra of solids (solid radioisotopes and XRF sources) at room temperature. These Atomic Spectra of solids could be significant breakthrough in the history of atomic spectroscopy.
6. The SIXTH DISCOVERY: Previously unknown atomic phenomenon
explaining how Bharat radiation, the first generation of
gamma, X-ray, and beta, and UV dominant optical emission the
second generation takes place from one and the same excited
atom in radioisotopes and XRF sources.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao, PhD
Former Professor of Medical Physics, New Delhi, India
raomap@yahoo.com
24 October 2010, 07:07
LATEST SIX FUNDAMENTAL
PHYSICSDISCOVERIES OF M.A.Padmanabha Rao
The
website
http://en.giswiki.net/wiki/User_talk:Raomap
is a
key ro explain what are the Six Fundamental
Physics Discoveries in the paper published
in
a peer reviewed journal:
PADMANABHA RAO, M. A. UV dominant optical
emission newly detected from radioisotopes and
XRF sources. Braz. J. Phys. [online].
2010, vol.40,
no.1,
pp. 38-46. ISSN 0103-9733.
[doi:
10.1590/S0103-97332010000100007.] [1]
http://www.sbfisica.org.br/bjp/files/v40_38.pdf
1. The FIRST EXPERIMENTAL DISCOVERY : UV dominant optical
emission from radioisotopes present as
radiochemicals.
2. The SECOND EXPERIMENTAL DISCOVERY : UV dominant optical
emission from XRF sources present as
salts.
3. The THIRD EXPERIMENTAL DISCOVERY : UV dominant optical
emission from metals at room
temperature when present as
radioisotopes or XRF sources.
4. The FOURTH DISCOVERY : Bharat radiation (predicted). I
quote from the published paper, "in
order to explain UV emission, it was predicted that
some eV energies higher than that of
UV, termed temporarily as Bharat radiation are
generated within the excited atom,
while gamma-, X-, or beta radiation
passes through core-Coulomb field".
For further details, please peruse the paper.
5. The FIFTH DISCOVERY: Bharat radiation causing a new class
of Atomic Spectra of solids (solid
radioisotopes and XRF sources) at room temperature. These
Atomic Spectra of solids could be
significant breakthrough in the history of atomic
spectroscopy.
6. The SIXTH DISCOVERY: Previously unknown atomic phenomenon
explaining how Bharat radiation, the
first generation of gamma, X-ray, and beta, and UV dominant
optical emission the second generation
takes place from from one and the same
excited atom in radioisotopes and XRF
sources.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao, PhD
Former Professor of Medical Physics, New Delhi, India
raomap@yahoo.com
Rao Effect : University students from Finland recognized the 'Rao effect' (X-ray source emits ) as an important physical phenomenon. www.students.tut.fi/~viigipuu/link/elmagef/
TRITIUM EMITS EXCLUSIVELY BHARAT RADIATION
The fact that 3H did not show any optical emission validates the atomic phenomenon. The reason being 3H has only one electron, which is in K-shell. Passage of β-emission through K-shell Coulomb field generates a Bharat photon. However, in the absence of an electron in L-shell, the Bharat photon simply escapes from 3H atom without producing any light photon by valence excitation. Unlike all other radioisotopes tested, 3H proved to be an ideal source of Bharat radiation in the absence of any optical emission. Likewise, Bharat radiation emission alone takes place from highly ionized radionuclides left with a singly filled K shell that can happen in a situation like nuclear fission.
MY COMMENTS ACCEPTED ON TRITIUM IN THE FOLLOWING WEBSITES
New Energy and Fuel
News and Views for Making and Saving Money in New Energy and
Fuel
Will There Be Enough Fuel For Fusion?
March 11, 2010 | 7 Comments http://newenergyandfuel.com/http:/newenergyandfuel/com/2010/03/11/will-there-be-enough-fuel-for-fusion/
I provide here the latest research findings on tritium from paper published in a peer reviewed journal. From within the same excited atoms of radioisotopes and X-ray sources well known as ionizing radiation sources, two non-ionizing radiations were discovered: (1) Bharat radiation emission (predicted) with the energy higher than that of UV at eV level, and (2) UV dominant optical emission that successively follow gamma, X-ray, and beta emissions. Therefore, traditional radioactive decay needed modification, by including Bharat radiation emission (predicted), and then UV dominant optical emission following the gamma, X-ray, and beta emissions. Tritium is essentially known as a weak beta emitter. But now the latest research findings show that tritium is an exception among all other radioisotopes and XRF sources tested, since it emits Bharat radiation (predicted) and not UV dominant optical radiation. In clear words, illustration on tritium beta decay should include Bharat radiation emission, after beta emission.
A brief phenomenological explanation comprising of two postulates is described in the following, so that a detailed mathematical explanation can follow later. (1) Ionizing radiation, particularly gamma-, X-, or beta radiation energy at keV or MeV level loses energy at eV level while passing through a core-Coulomb field. The loss of energy is reproduced as electromagnetic radiation with the same energy at eV level but higher than that of UV or EUV that the source emits. (2) The energy causes valence excitation resulting into UV dominant atomic spectrum.
The author was able to verify the validity of this phenomenon when 3H (tritium) did not show any optical emission on keeping a 3H ampoule directly on the quartz window of the bare PMT (9635QB Thorn EMI). The reason being 3H has only one electron, which is in K-shell. Passage of ß-emission through K-shell Coulomb field generates a Bharat photon. However, in the absence of an electron in L-shell, the Bharat photon simply escapes from 3H atom without producing any light photon by valence excitation. Hopefully, this insight might prompt others to verify the author’s experimental finding on 3H. Likewise, Bharat radiation emission alone takes place from highly ionized radionuclides left with a singly filled K shell that can happen in a situation like nuclear fission. Confirmation of this newly predicted Bharat energies higher than that of UV or EUV needs development of a PMT or some other detector sensitive enough in this energy region. While radiation dose to the person exposed to tritirm is expected to be due to beta radiation, now the Bharat radiation emission may raise the dose particularly to skin and outer layers of the body.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao,
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from
radioisotopes and XRF sources,
Brazilian Journal of Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March 2010.
http://
www.sbfisica.org.br/bjp/files/v40_38.pdf
.
Someone's comment on my comment:
Fashion on October 28, 2010 8:38 am
Actually informative entry to read on.. I’m genuinely amazed with this content. Searching forward for more information
Friday, April 9, 2010
By: Pam Sohn
The recently published paper claims Tritium emits Bharat radiation with energy higher than that of UV at eV level.
Brazilian Journal of Physics
version ISSN 0103-9733
Braz. J. Phys. vol.40 no.1 São Paulo Mar. 2010
doi: 10.1590/S0103-97332010000100007
M.A.Padmanabha Rao
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from
radioisotopes and XRF sources
www.sbfisica.org.br/bjp/files/v40_38.pdf.
"Tritium: a source of Bharat
radiation
The author was able to verify the validity of the
phenomenon, when 3H did not show any optical emission on
keeping a 3H ampoule directly on the quartz window of the bare
PMT (9635QB Thorn EMI). The reason being 3H has
only one electron, which is in K-shell. Passage of β-emission
through K-shell Coulomb field generates a Bharat photon.
However, in the absence of an electron in L-shell, the Bharat
photon simply escapes from 3H atom without
producing any light photon by valence excitation. Hopefully,
this insight might prompt others to verify the author's
experimental finding on 3H. Likewise, Bharat
radiation emission alone takes place from highly ionized
radionuclides left with a singly filled K shell that can
happen in a situation like nuclear fission. Confirmation of
this newly predicted Bharat energies higher than that of UV or
EUV needs development of a PMT or some other detector
sensitive enough in this energy region".
M.A.Padmanabha Rao, PhD
Former Professor of Medical Physics
raomap@yahoo.com
Delhi cell Phone : 91-011- 9871257964
Username: raomap | On: September 2, 2010 at 6:16 a.m.
4. Exelon forced to clean up tritium leak at Oyster Creek nuclear plant
http://www.nj.com/business/index.ssf/2010/05/exelon_forced_to_clean_up_trit.html
Abby Gruen/The Star-Ledger
raomap September 02, 2010 at 5:58AM
The recently published paper claims Tritium emits Bharat radiation (predicted) with energy higher than that of UV at eV level.
Brazilian Journal of Physics
version ISSN 0103-9733
Braz. J. Phys. vol.40 no.1 São Paulo Mar. 2010
doi: 10.1590/S0103-97332010000100007
M.A.Padmanabha Rao
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from
radioisotopes and XRF sources
www.sbfisica.org.br/bjp/files/v40_38.pdf
"Tritium: a source of Bharat
radiation
The author was able to verify the validity of the
phenomenon, when 3H did not show any optical emission on
keeping a 3H ampoule directly on the quartz window of the bare
PMT (9635QB Thorn EMI). The reason being 3H has only one
electron, which is in K-shell. Passage of β-emission through
K-shell Coulomb field generates a Bharat photon. However, in
the absence of an electron in L-shell, the Bharat photon
simply escapes from 3H atom without producing any light photon
by valence excitation. Hopefully, this insight might prompt
others to verify the author's experimental finding on 3H.
Likewise, Bharat radiation emission alone takes place from
highly ionized radionuclides left with a singly filled K shell
that can happen in a situation like nuclear fission.
Confirmation of this newly predicted Bharat energies higher
than that of UV or EUV needs development of a PMT or some
other detector sensitive enough in this energy region".
M.A.Padmanabha Rao, PhD
Former Professor of Medical Physics
raomap@yahoo.com
Delhi cell Phone : 91-011- 9871257964
The current study explains solar EUV, the familiar dark matter and dark radiation.
The experimental evidence that γ-, X-, and β radiations causing UV dominant optical emission from within excited atoms of radioisotopes suggests the possibility for solar γ-, X-, and β radiations causing EUV by the atomic phenomenon described here. On this basis, uranium fission in Sun seemed to be the source for solar γ-, X-, and β radiations causing solar EUV. If fission truly happens, the fission fragments left over at the site of fission might constitute dark matter. In the context of solar flare, the predicted Bharat radiation causing UV dominant optical radiation from radioisotopes and XRF sources by valence excitation seemed to be the familiar dark radiation from cosmic sources.
COMMENTS ON SOLAR ACTIVITY ARE ACCEPTED IN THE FOLLOWING WEBSITES
NATURE .COM
Published online 6 October 2010 | Nature | doi:10.1038/news.2010.519
The Sun may have caused as much warming as carbon dioxide over three years.
#15006
The reported finding by Joann D. Haigh et all "The data, collected by the Sorce satellite between 2004 and 2007, revealed that the intensity of the ultraviolet light in the sun's rays fell by six times more than predicted over that period, while the amount of visible light exceeded expectations" is absolutely correct, according to my experimental findings with radioisotopes and XRF sources (Refer Fig. 3 of the following paper published in a peer reviewed journal):
M.A. Padmanabha Rao,
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from
radioisotopes and XRF sources,
Brazilian Journal of Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March
2010.
http://
www.sbfisica.org.br/bjp/files/v40_38.pdf
The current study has shown for the first time that gamma, characteristic X-ray, and beta emissions cause UV dominant optical emission from within one and the same excited atom of a radioisotope or XRF source by a previously unknown atomic phenomenon described in the paper. In general, atomic spectra of these sources sources exhibited two spectral features (1) UV dominance, and (2) dependence upon ionizing radiation energy. UV dominance is as high as 99.62% at 0.013336 MeV (Rb XRF source), and 98.03% at 0.05954 MeV (gamma, 241-Am), while VIS, and NIR radiation intensities will be correspondingly low, say, 0.37, 0.01% respectively from Rb XRF source, and 1.91%,0.06% from 241- Am . Though UV is predominant in general from ionizing radiation sources, UV falls from 99.62 to 83.36% when energy of maximum abundant ionizing radiation increases from 0.013336 MeV (Rb XRF) to 2.288 MeV (of beta, 90-Y). The UV dips not below 83.36 in any case, from a relatively high energy source. In the current situation, decrease in UV and rise in visible and near infra red radiations between 2004 and 2007 can be due to emission of high energy gamma, X-ray and beta radiations from certain radioisotopes formed by Uranium fission taking place in Sun (refer paper).
M.A. Padmanabha Rao, PhD
Former Professor of Medical Physics, New Delhi,
India
raomap@yahoo.
Posted by: M.A.Padmanabha Rao 2010-10-15 04:16:13 AM
http:// news.softpedia.com/news/More-Auroras-Linked-to-Increased-Solar-Activity-150301.shtml
Comment #1 by: M.A.Padmanabha Rao on 24 Sep 2010, 08:09 GMT |
|
This is regarding the coronal mass
ejection (CME) that occur at the extreme
ultraviolet (EUV) wavelength
range. |
By ReutersWed, Oct 06 2010 at 2:05 PM EST Comments
Posted By M.A.Padmanabha rao, PhD - Fri, Oct 15 2010
at 6:35 AM EST
The reported finding by Joann D. Haigh et all "The data,
collected by the Sorce satellite between 2004 and 2007,
revealed that the intensity of the ultraviolet light in
the sun's rays fell by six times more than predicted over
that period, while the amount of visible light exceeded
expectations" is absolutely correct, according to my
experimental findings with radioisotopes and XRF sources
(Refer Fig. 3 of the following paper published in a peer
reviewed journal):
M.A. Padmanabha Rao,
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from
radioisotopes and XRF sources,
Brazilian Journal of Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March 2010.
http://www.sbfisica.org.br/bjp/files/v40_38.pdf
The current study has shown for the first time that gamma, characteristic X-ray, and beta emissions cause UV dominant optical emission from within one and the same excited atom of a radioisotope or XRF source by a previously unknown atomic phenomenon described in the paper. In general, atomic spectra of these sources exhibited two spectral features (1) UV dominance, and (2) dependence upon ionizing radiation energy. UV dominance is as high as 99.62% at 0.013336 MeV (Rb XRF source), and 98.03% at 0.05954 MeV (gamma, 241Am), while %VIS, and NIR radiation intensities will be correspondingly low, say, 0.37%, 0.01% respectively from Rb XRF source, and 1.91%, 0.06% from 241Am . Though UV is predominant in general from ionizing radiation sources, %UV falls from 99.62% to 83.36% when energy of maximum abundant ionizing radiation increases from 0.013336 MeV (Rb XRF) to 2.288 MeV (of beta, 90Y). The %UV dips not below 83.36% in any case, from a relatively high energy source. In the current situation, decrease in UV and rise in visible and near infra red radiations between 2004 and 2007 can be due to emission of high energy gamma, X-ray and beta radiations from certain radioisotopes formed by Uranium fission taking place in Sun (refer paper).
M.A.Padmanabha Rao, PhD
Former Professor of Medical Physics, New Delhi,
India.
raomap@yahoo.com
by Julianne
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2010/08/13/the-next-decade-of-us-space-astronomy/
Regarding X-ray and UV Astronomy with reference to Solar X-rays, EUV:
The phenomenon described in the following paper explains solar EUV
Excerpts from the paper:
Findings of the current experimental study have a
direct bearing on solar emissions. There is a similarity
in the γ-, X-, β, UV, VIS, and NIR radiation emissions
from radioisotopes, XRF sources, and solar flares [14-19].
Therefore, the author has preliminarily reported [3] that
solar γ-, X-, or β radiations cause EUV regardless of
temperature by the atomic phenomenon described here. On
the basis of the current study, it may be worthy of a
review of interpretation of solar EUV lines to be of
highly ionized atoms at high temperatures, and estimation
of solar temperature from EUV line ratios [20-21]. An
overall view of published reports suggesting presence of
235U, 238U, and radioisotopes in
solar flare indicate that the phenomenon described here
could be the most likely cause for Solar EUV emission. For
example, as detection of γ, and neutron fission counts
helps in finding the presence of uranium [22-23],
simultaneous detection of X- rays, γ-rays, and neutrons
reported in solar flares [24-27] suggests the presence of
uranium in Sun. The hypothesis on likely presence of
uranium in Sun derive further strength from the report on
uranium content of solar salts [28] and traditional wisdom
that 235U and 238U metals in the
solar system are formed from previous supernovae.
Moreover, presence of activation products such as
56Co, and 24Na in solar flare
[29-32] and presence of 7Be in open air after a
strong solar wind [33] need to be critically examined to
see whether any possibility exists for Uranium fission in
Sun. If fission truly happens, the fission fragments left
over at the site of fission might constitute dark matter
[3].
In the context of solar flare, the predicted Bharat radiation causing UV dominant optical radiation from radioisotopes and XRF sources by valence excitation seemed to be the familiar dark radiation from cosmic sources [3]. As Bharat energies produced internally within an excited atom cause non-thermal valence excitation resulting into UV emission from radioisotopes at room temperature, solar EUV may take place by valence excitation of dark energies from within excited atoms of radioisotopes present in solar flare regardless of temperature. As in the case of the current study, the γ-, X-, or β radiation emissions from radioisotopes formed by fission reaction in Sun cause two more generation of emissions: the predicted dark radiation, which is the same as Bharat radiation followed by EUV. Any how the current experimental study may prompt to examine all these possibilities.
Brazilian Journal of Physics
version ISSN 0103-9733
Braz. J. Phys. vol.40 no.1 São Paulo Mar. 2010
doi: 10.1590/S0103-97332010000100007
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0103-97332010000100007
Posted by: M.A.Padmanabha Rao,PhD | October 24, 2010 2:48 AM
My comments on application of the current research to explain Sun light
M.A.Padmanabha Rao, PhD November 7, 2010 at 1:58 am #
This comment is on the statement,” To help with this is an instrument called SEE (or the Solar EUV Experiment) built at the University of Colo., which looks at the sun’s x-rays and extreme ultraviolet rays to see how they impact our atmosphere”. The following paper published in a peer reviewed journal claims that the sun’s X-rays and extreme ultraviolet rays are from radioisotopes (fission fragments) caused by Uranium fission taking place in sun:
Due to nuclear fission, one after another the core electrons get knocked out of excited atoms in radioisotopes resulting into characteristic X-ray emission in Sun. Gamma, X-ray, and beta emissions from fission fragments cause dark radiation, (predicted) with the energy higher than that of UV at eV level, which inturn causes UV dominant optical emission from within the one and same excited atom by a previously unknown atomic phenomenon described in the paper. Therefore, the current sub-atomic research with radioisotopes and XRF sources suggests that the sun’s X-rays and EUV are from radioisotopes, in other words, fission fragments. The Earth seemed to attract EUV, and UV more towards at North and South poles due to its high gravity, while the visible light, near infrared and infrared radiations are attracted towards tropical countries like India due to low gravity.
Press Release
NASA extends TIMED mission for fourth time
http://www.labspaces.net/107525/NASA_extends_TIMED_mission_for_fourth_time
http://www.labspaces.net/view_news_comments.php?newsID=107525&success=1#commentMessage
Wed, Nov 10, 2010, 11:08 pm CST
My comment is exclusively on the statement, "To help with this is an instrument called SEE (or the Solar EUV Experiment) built at the University of Colo., which looks at the sun's x-rays and extreme ultraviolet rays to see how they impact our atmosphere". Most significantly, the Sun light that we receive everyday is mainly due to solar gamma, X-ray, and beta emissions. My sub-atomic research done for nearly 21 years with radioisotopes and XRF sources has disclosed that gamma, characteristic X-ray, and beta emissions cause UV (dominant), visible light (VIS), and near infrared (NIR) radiations from within one and same excite atom of a radioisotope or XRF source by a previously unknown atomic phenomenon described in the following paper published in a peer reviewed journal. The dominant UV exceeds 84% of the gross optical intensity from radioisotopes (Table 1), while the rest 16% is shared by VIS and NIR radiations. There is a similarity in the gamma-, X-ray, beta, UV, VIS, and NIR radiation emissions from radioisotopes, XRF sources, and solar flares. The experimental findings hinted that radioisotopes present in Sun could be the source for gamma, characteristic X-ray, beta emissions, which inturn cause EUV, UV, VIS, NIR, and IR radiations at room temperature by the new atomic phenomenon. Also shown a strong possibility for Uranium fission in Sun causing radioisotopes (fission fragments). The uranium fission reaction (nuclear explosion) appears as solar flare. Earth seems to play a crucial role in attracting more of EUV and UV radiations towards its poles and VIS, NIR,and IR radiations towards Equator.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao,
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from
radioisotopes and XRF sources,
Brazilian Journal of Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March 2010.
http://
www.sbfisica.org.br/bjp/files/v40_38.pdf
.
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/61961/title/Warning_for_solar_flares
Warning for solar flares
Microwave bursts may serve as warning shots
By Sid Perkins
August 28th, 2010; Vol.178 #5 (p. 13
I wish to add latest research results on the solar
activity mentioned in the news: " During periods of
intense solar activity, immense clouds of radiation
and charged particles erupt from the sun’s surface".
The following paper describes that solar storm
consisting of charged particles, gamma rays, X-rays,
and EUV arise from radioisotopes produced by Uranium
fission. Gamma-, X-, and beta radiations causing UV
dominant optical emission from within excited atoms of
radioisotopes suggests the possibility for solar
gamma-, X-, and beta radiations causing EUV by the
atomic phenomenon described in the paper. Solar EUV
lines reported by various researchers are actually due
to radioisotopes produced by Uranium fission taking
place in Sun. Radioisotopes produced in Sun cause a
new class of room temperature atomic spectra of solids
(radioisotopes and X-ray sources) by a previously
unknown phenomenon. X-ray sources can be radioisotopes
that emit predominantly characteristic X-rays.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao,
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from
radioisotopes and XRF sources,
Brazilian Journal of Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March
2010.
ABSTRACT
The current paper reports first and definite
experimental evidence for gamma-, X-, or beta
radiation causing UV dominant optical radiation from
(1) radiochemicals such as 131I; (2) XRF
sources such as Rb XRF source present as salts; and
(3) metal sources such as 57Co, and Cu XRF
sources. Due to low quantum yield a need arose to
develop two techniques with narrow band optical
filters, and sheet polarizers that helped in the
successful detection of optical radiation. The metal
57Co spectrum observed at room temperature
hinted that it could be optical emission from excited
57Co atoms by a previously unknown
phenomenon. In order to explain UV emission, it was
predicted that some eV energies higher than that of
UV, termed temporarily as Bharat radiation are
generated within the excited atom, while gamma-, X-,
and beta passes through core-Coulomb field. In turn,
the Bharat energy internally produced within the
excited atom causes UV dominant high-energy spectrum
by valence excitation. As excited atoms become free
from surrounding unexcited atoms by valence
excitation, room temperature atomic spectra of solid
radioisotopes and XRF sources became a possibility. It
implies existence of temporary atomic state of solids.
The experimental evidence that gamma-, X-, and beta
radiations causing UV dominant optical emission from
within excited atoms of radioisotopes suggests the
possibility for solar gamma-, X-, and beta radiations
causing EUV by the atomic phenomenon described
here.
M.A.Padmanabha Rao
Sep. 27, 2010 at 3:20am
CROSS REFERENCE
http://pusatpromo.com/search/x+calss+solar+flare+imminent
Warning For Solar Flares - Science News
IGUASSU FALLS, Brazil — Fluctuating bursts of
microwave energy from the sun could provide
imminent warning of the huge solar
flares known as coronal mass ejections, new
research hints. Radioisotopes produced in Sun cause a
new class of room temperature atomic spectra of
solids (radioisotopes and X-ray sources) by a
previously unknown phenomenon. X-ray sources
can be radioisotopes that emit predominantly
characteristic X-rays. M.A. Padmanabha Rao,
www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/61961/title/Warning_for_solar_flares
SOLAR FISSION
The published paper claims that the Sun light may be due to Uranium fission
“Moreover, presence of activation products such as 56Co, and 24Na in solar flare [ References 29-32 in the published paper] and presence of 7Be in open air after a strong solar wind [ Reference 33] need to be critically examined to see whether any possibility exists for Uranium fission in Sun”.
The new information on Uranium fission causing Sun light was accepted as comments:
http://justinwrites.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/seven-amazing-breakthroughs-in-physics-this-year/
Posted by justinwrites on May 3, 2010 · 1 Comment
One Response to “Seven Amazing Breakthroughs in Physics This Year”
M.A.Padmanabha Rao,PhD says:
My comment is on ” Levitating Magnet Points to Nuclear Fusion”. I congratulate the team of scientists for the exciting research work done. Previously , scientists widely believed that the Sun light is due to fusion. Solar EUV lines are due to radioisotopes produced by Uranium fission, according to the following peer reviewed paper. Radioisotopes cause a new class of room temperature atomic spectra of solids (radioisotopes and X-ray sources) by a previously unknown phenomenon. X-ray sources can be radioisotopes that emit predominantly characteristic X-rays. There is a similarity in the gamma-, X- , beta , UV, VIS, and NIR radiation emissions from radioisotopes, XRF sources, and solar flares. The experimental findings hinted that radioisotopes present in Sun could be the source for gamma, X-ray, beta, EUV radiations. Also shown a strong possibility for Uranium fission in Sun causing radioisotopes (fission fragments). The uranium fission reaction (nuclear explosion) appears as solar flare. If fission truly happens, the fission fragments left over at the site of fission might constitute dark matter. In the context of solar flare, the predicted Bharat radiation with energy higher than that of UV at eV level produced by gamma, X-ray or beta radiation within the excited atom by a previously unknown atomic phenomenon seemed to be the familiar dark radiation. In simple words, dark matter emits dark radiation. As Bharat energies produced internally within an excited atom cause non-thermal valence excitation resulting into UV emission from radioisotopes at room temperature, Solar EUV may take place by valence excitation of dark energies from within excited atoms of radioisotopes present in solar flare regardless of temperature. Radioisotopes produced in the Sun emit a new class of “Room Temperature Atomic Spectra of Solids” (solid radioisotopes or XRF sources). In clear words, the solar EUV can be produced even at normal temperature from radioisotopes. Tritium and other highly ionized fission fragments left with a singly filled orbit emit only the Dark (Bharat) radiation but not UV dominant optical emission. As in the case of the current study, the gamma-, X-, or beta radiation emissions from radioisotopes formed by fission reaction (dark matter) in Sun cause two more generation of emissions: the predicted dark radiation, which is the same as Bharat radiation followed by EUV or UV dominant optical emission.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao, PhD
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from
radioisotopes and XRF sources”
Brazilian Journal of Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March
2010.
http://www.sbfisica.org.br/bjp/files/v40_38.pdf
New ideas on Total Solar Irradiance and flares http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/10/15/new-ideas-on-total-solar-irradiance-and-flares/
Posted on October 15, 2010 by Anthony Watts
From: SOHO sheds new light on solar flares
ESA Science & Technology
M.A. Padmanabha Rao, PhD says:
My comment is regarding the two sentences, “Flares are
sudden energy releases in the Sun’s atmosphere that occur
when the solar magnetic field is locally unstable. …. At
such sizzling temperatures, much of their radiation is
emitted as X-rays”.
The following paper describes that solar flare consisting
of charged particles, gamma rays, X-rays, and EUV arise
from radioisotopes produced by Uranium fission. Gamma-,
X-, and beta radiations cause UV dominant optical emission
from within excited atoms of radioisotopes suggesting the
possibility for solar gamma-, X-, and ß radiations causing
EUV by the atomic phenomenon described in the paper.
Radioisotopes produced in the Sun emit a new class of
“Room Temperature Atomic Spectra of Solids” (solid
radioisotopes or XRF sources). Previously, various
researchers reported that the solar EUV lines are from
stable isotopes at high temperature, but the current study
suggests that solar EUV lines are actually due to
radioisotopes produced by Uranium fission taking place in
Sun. Since Uranium fission fragments (radioisotopes) left
over on the Sun constitute Dark Matter, the dark matter
can be detected through gamma rays, X-rays or beta
particles. The excited atoms in fission fragments
temporarily remain in atomic state and can cause atomic
spectra even at room temperature. Radioisotope or X-ray
source emit two more successive radiations following
gamma, X-ray or beta: (1) Bharat radiation (predicted)
with energy higher than that of UV at eV level, and (2) UV
dominant optical emission. The paper also explains how a
previously unknown atomic phenomenon causes Bharat
radiation, which in turn causes UV dominant optical
emission from within an excited atom of these sources.
Dark Radiation emitted by dark matter in the Sun has been
attributed to Bharat radiation. In the case of nuclear
fission, radioisotopes may get highly ionized and will be
left with singly filled orbit like Tritium. Such highly
ionized radioisotopes emit only the Bharat radiation but
not UV dominant optical emission. X-rays observed from Sun
can be from radioisotopes that emit predominantly
characteristic X-rays. In nut shell, solar flare not only
consists of neutrons, protons, gamma, X-ray, beta, EUV,
UV, visible, and infra red radiations but also Bharat
radiation,.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao,
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from
radioisotopes and XRF sources,
Brazilian Journal of Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March
2010.
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0103-97332010000100007&script=sci_arttext
A Massive Winter Heading for the Northern Hemisphere?
by M.A.Padmanabha Rao - 09/24/2010 - 00:41
http://www.landscheidt.info/?q=node/189
Solar EUV lines are due to radioisotopes produced by Uranium fission, according to the following peer reviewed paper. Radioisotopes cause a new class of room temperature atomic spectra of solids (radioisotopes and X-ray sources) by a previously unknown phenomenon. X-ray sources can be radioisotopes that emit predominantly characteristic X-rays.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao,
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from radioisotopes and XRF sources,
Brazilian Journal of Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March 2010.
http://www.sbfisica.org.br/bjp/files/v40_38.pdf
ABSTRACT
The current paper reports first and definite experimental evidence for gamma-, X-, or beta radiation causing UV dominant optical radiation from (1) radiochemicals such as 131I; (2) XRF sources such as Rb XRF source present as salts; and (3) metal sources such as 57Co, and Cu XRF sources. Due to low quantum yield a need arose to develop two techniques with narrow band optical filters, and sheet polarizers that helped in the successful detection of optical radiation. The metal 57Co spectrum observed at room temperature hinted that it could be optical emission from excited 57Co atoms by a previously unknown phenomenon. In order to explain UV emission, it was predicted that some eV energies higher than that of UV, termed temporarily as Bharat radiation are generated within the excited atom, while gamma-, X-, and beta passes through core-Coulomb field. In turn, the Bharat energy internally produced within the excited atom causes UV dominant high-energy spectrum by valence excitation. As excited atoms become free from surrounding unexcited atoms by valence excitation, room temperature atomic spectra of solid radioisotopes and XRF sources became a possibility. It implies existence of temporary atomic state of solids. The experimental evidence that gamma-, X-, and beta radiations causing UV dominant optical emission from within excited atoms of radioisotopes suggests the possibility for solar gamma-, X-, and ß radiations causing EUV by the atomic phenomenon described here.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao, PhD
Former Professor of Medical Physics, New Delhi, India
The Young Astronomers
October 13, 2010
http://ya.astroleague.org/?p=2004
Oct 19 2010
My comment is regarding the sentence, “it is unusual in that the vast majority of the energy released in the six-month flare up in the event was in the IR radiation band”. My experimental research has shown for the first time that gamma, characteristic X-ray, and beta emissions cause UV dominant optical emission from within one and the same excited atom of a radioisotope or XRF source by a previously unknown atomic phenomenon described in the following paper.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao,
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from
radioisotopes and XRF sources,
Brazilian Journal of Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March
2010.
http://www.sbfisica.org.br/bjp/files/v40_38.pdf
In general, the new class of atomic spectra of these solid sources exhibited two spectral features (1) UV dominance, and (2) dependence upon ionizing radiation energy. Though UV is predominant in general from ionizing radiation sources, %UV falls from 99.62% to 83.36% when energy of maximum abundant ionizing radiation increases from 0.013336 MeV (Rb XRF) to 2.288 MeV (of beta, 90Y). The %UV dips not below 83.36% in any case, from a relatively high energy radioisotope or XRF source (Table 1 of the paper). However, when energy of gamma, X-ray, and beta exceeds 14 MeV, they cause exclusively visible light and near infra red radiation from one and the same excited atom (refer Fig.3 of the paper). In the current situation, the cloud in the IR radiation band can be due to gamma, X-ray, and beta emissions with energy exceeding 14 MeV from Supernova.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao, PhD
Former Professor of Medical Physics, New Delhi,
India
raomap@yahoo.com
Oct 19 2010
Hello Dr. Rao,
I fully admit that I do not fully comprehend the
advanced nuclear Physics set out in your comment and
paper, I think you are saying that it is possible for
the I-R emission to be a result of the absorption and
remission of gamma and x-rays within the dust cloud
surrounding the supernova. If this indeed (in simple
terms) what you were describing it is good to hear
that the conclusions of the astrophysicists’ (which
agree with your experimental results) have practical
backing.
Peter
http://www.deccanchronicle.com/national/astronomer-fears-apocalypse-2012-true-507
September 20th, 2010
Submitted by M.A. Padmanabha Rao, PhD on Mon, 27/09/2010 - 11:57am.
I wish to add latest research results to what has been mentioned on the solar wind: “The solar wind is a stream of charged particles that blow out of the corona of the Sun at supersonic speeds to the outer reaches of the planetary orbits,” explains Prof. Raman, head of Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Kodaikanal”. The following paper describes that solar wind consisting of charged particles, gamma rays, X-rays, and EUV arise from radioisotopes produced by Uranium fission. Gamma-, X-, and beta radiations causing UV dominant optical emission from within excited atoms of radioisotopes suggests the possibility for solar gamma-, X-, and beta radiations causing EUV by the atomic phenomenon described in the paper. Solar EUV lines reported by various researchers are actually due to radioisotopes produced by Uranium fission taking place in Sun. Radioisotopes produced in Sun cause a new class of room temperature atomic spectra of solids (radioisotopes and X-ray sources) by a previously unknown phenomenon. Solar X-ray sources can be radioisotopes that emit predominantly characteristic X-rays.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao,
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from
radioisotopes and XRF sources,
Brazilian Journal of Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March 2010.
ABSTRACT
The current paper reports first and definite
experimental evidence for gamma-, X-, or beta
radiation causing UV dominant optical radiation from
(1) radiochemicals such as 131I; (2) XRF
sources such as Rb XRF source present as salts; and
(3) metal sources such as 57Co, and Cu XRF
sources. Due to low quantum yield a need arose to
develop two techniques with narrow band optical
filters, and sheet polarizers that helped in the
successful detection of optical radiation. The metal
57Co spectrum observed at room temperature
hinted that it could be optical emission from excited
57Co atoms by a previously unknown
phenomenon. In order to explain UV emission, it was
predicted that some eV energies higher than that of
UV, termed temporarily as Bharat radiation are
generated within the excited atom, while gamma-, X-,
and beta passes through core-Coulomb field. In turn,
the Bharat energy internally produced within the
excited atom causes UV dominant high-energy spectrum
by valence excitation. As excited atoms become free
from surrounding unexcited atoms by valence
excitation, room temperature atomic spectra of solid
radioisotopes and XRF sources became a possibility. It
implies existence of temporary atomic state of solids.
The experimental evidence that gamma-, X-, and beta
radiations causing UV dominant optical emission from
within excited atoms of radioisotopes suggests the
possibility for solar gamma-, X-, and ß radiations
causing EUV by the atomic phenomenon described here.
Sun's Role in Warming the Planet May Be Overstated, Study Finds
The discovery could help explain why Europe can have cold winters while the world as a whole is heating up
http://solveclimatenews.com/news/20101007/suns-role-warming-planet-may-be-overstated-study-finds
by Damian Carrington, Guardian Oct 7, 2010
Submitted by M.A.Padmanabha Rao, PhD (not verified) on October 18, 2010 - 12:33am.
This is to give a clear view to my comment given
on 13th October 2010 regarding the finding of
Joann D. Haigh et all on sun's rays between 2004
and 2007.
The current study (Brazilian Journal of Physics,
Vol.40, no.1, March 2010) has shown for the first
time that gamma, characteristic X-ray, and beta
emissions cause UV dominant optical emission from
within one and the same excited atom of a
radioisotope or XRF source by a previously unknown
atomic phenomenon described in the paper. In
general, atomic spectra of these sources sources
exhibited two spectral features (1) UV dominance,
and (2) dependence upon ionizing radiation energy.
UV dominance is as high as 99.62% at 0.013336 MeV
(Rb XRF source), and 98.03% at 0.05954 MeV (gamma,
241Am), while VIS, and NIR radiation
intensities will be correspondingly low, say,
0.37, 0.01% respectively from Rb XRF source, and
1.91%,0.06% from 241Am . Though UV is
predominant in general from ionizing radiation
sources, UV falls from 99.62 to 83.36% when energy
of maximum abundant ionizing radiation increases
from 0.013336 MeV (Rb XRF) to 2.288 MeV (of beta,
90Y). The UV dips not below 83.36 in
any case, from a relatively high energy source. In
the current situation, decrease in UV and rise in
visible and near infra red radiations between 2004
and 2007 can be due to emission of high energy
gamma, X-ray and beta radiations from certain
radioisotopes formed by Uranium fission taking
place in Sun (refer paper).
M.A. Padmanabha Rao, PhD
Submitted by M.A.Padmanabha rao, PhD (not verified) on October 13, 2010 - 6:06am.
Sun’s role in warming the planet may be overestimated, study finds
http://www.bnbtimes.com/general/suns-role-warming-planet-overestimated-study-finds/
Submitted by naren
Comment (1)
My experimental findings with
radioisotopes and XRF sources support
the reported finding "The data,
collected by the Sorce satellite
between 2004 and 2007, revealed that
the intensity of the ultraviolet light
in the sun's rays fell by six times
more than predicted over that period,
while the amount of visible light
exceeded expectations" as absolutely
correct. This can be evident from
Fig.3 of the following paper published
in a peer reviewed journal:
M.A. Padmanabha Rao,
UV dominant optical emission newly
detected from radioisotopes and XRF
sources,
Brazilian Journal of Physics, Vol.40,
no.1, March 2010.
http://www.sbfisica.org.br/bjp/files/v40_38.pdf
According to Fig.3, at low ionizing
radiation energy, whether it is of
radioisotope or XRF source, the
percent UV emission in the gross light
intensity [ultraviolet (UV), visible
(VIS), and near infra red (NIR)
radiations together] is much higher
than VIS and NIR radiations. In the
current situation, decrease in UV and
rise in visible and near infra red
radiations since 2004 can be due to
two reasons. 1. It can be due to
emission of low energy gamma, X-ray
and beta radiations from certain
radioisotopes present in Sun that
predominantly emit gamma,
characteristic X-rays, or beta
radiations. The following sentence
quoted from the paper explains that
the observed EUV and visible light is
due to radioisotopes present in the
Sun. "The experimental evidence that
gamma-, X-, and beta radiations
causing UV dominant optical emission
from within excited atoms of
radioisotopes suggests the possibility
for solar gamma-, X-, and beta
radiations causing EUV by the atomic
phenomenon described here." The
uranium fission taking place in Sun is
shown responsible for fission
fragments (radioisotopes). Gamma,
characteristic X-ray, and beta
emissions from radioisotopes formed by
nuclear fission cause EUV and visible
light (VIS) and near infrared (NIR)
radiations from one and the same
excited atoms by a previously unknown
atomic phenomenon described in the
paper.
2. Rise in gravitational force, if
any, during the period of observation
also can attract high energy
radiations both ionizing (including
gamma, X-ray, and beta) and non
ionizing radiation like EUV or UV. How
gravitational force acts on radiation
and matter is explained in the
following. In physics, some missing
gaps still exist. My experimental and
subatomic research with radioisotopes
and XRF sources has revealed that beta
does not exhibit its well known
particle behavior within an excited
atom of a radioisotope or X-ray
source. I believe when beta escapes
from an excited atom, beta acquires
mass due to Earth's gravitational
attraction. It is because
gravitational force shows attraction
on both matter and radiation. For
example, abundant cosmic radiation
from Sun such as gamma, X-ray, beta,
as well as EUV at North and South
poles are due to attraction by Earth’s
high gravitational force. In tropical
countries such as India relatively
less energetic radiations including
visible light and infra red radiation
from Sun are due to Earth’s relatively
low gravitational force. All such
examples lead to an entirely new
concept that both matter (such as
electrons, protons, neutrons) and
radiation (conceptually both photons
and waves) consist of three
components: (a) electric, (b)
magnetic, and (c) gravitational
forces. In a particular situation only
one component is in excess, so
influences accordingly on electron or
photon. This needs a detailed
explanation.
COMMENTS ON DARK MATTER
In the published paper, the puzzling Dark matter is precisely defined as fission fragments left over at the site of fission in Sun.
Page 45:
“ If fission truly happens, the fission fragments left over at the site of fission might constitute dark matter[Reference 3].
The new information on Dark matter are accepted as comments:
http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2010/05/dark_matter_stays_dark.html
Uranium fission fragments constitute Dark Matter,
according to the following paper: M.A.Padmanabha
Rao,
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from
radioisotopes and XRF source, Brazilian Journal of
Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March 2010.
Posted by: Dr.M.A.Padmanabha Rao | September 8, 2010 06:08 PM
source: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727753.800-black-holes--dark-matter--light.html
MY COMMENT
raomap
Uranium fission fragments constitute Dark Matter in SUN,
according to the following paper:
M.A. Padmanabha Rao
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from
radioisotopes and XRF sources” Brazilian Journal of
Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March 2010.
http://
www.sbfisica.org.br/bjp/files/v40_38.pdf.
Integral disproves dark matter origin for mystery radiation
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=integral-disproves-dark-matter-orig
A team of researchers working with data from ESA's Integral gamma-ray observatory has disproved theories that some form of dark matter explains mysterious radiation in the Milky Way.
July 22, 2009
For the first time, the Dark matter that exists in the Sun
has been clearly defined in the following peer reviewed
paper. Uranium fission fragments left over on the Sun
constitute Dark Matter. Therefore, the dark matter can be
detected through gamma rays, X-rays or beta particles,
according to the following paper.
Radioisotope or X-ray source emit two more successive
radiations following gamma, X-ray or beta particle: (1)
Bharat radiation (predicted) with energy higher than that
of UV at eV level, and (2) UV dominant optical emission
from one and the same excited atom. The paper also
explains how a previously unknown atomic phenomenon causes
Bharat radiation, which in turn causes UV dominant optical
emission from within an excited atom of these sources.
Dark Radiation emitted by dark matter in the Sun has been
attributed to Bharat radiation. Tritium is an exception
that it will emit only the Bharat radiation but not UV
dominant optical emission. X-ray sources can be
radioisotopes that emit predominantly characteristic
X-rays.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao,
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from
radioisotopes and XRF sources,
Brazilian Journal of Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March
2010.
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0103-97332010000100007&script=sci_arttext
M.A. Padmanabha Rao, PhD
Former Professor of Medical Physics, New Delhi, India
raomap@yahoo.com
milky-ways-core-yields-strong-evidence-of-dark-matter.html
I agree with the statement "Like normal matter, dark matter has gravitational pull, helping to glue billions of stars together into galaxies. But it’s called dark for a reason: The stuff hardly interacts with normal matter, making it invisible". Here I made an attempt to clarify what is dark matter and energy. For the first time, dark matter in the Sun has been clearly defined as the Uranium fission fragments left over on the Sun, in the following peer reviewed paper. Therefore, dark matter can be detected from distance through gamma rays, X-rays, EUV or UV. It is justified to be addressed as dark matter. First of all, it cannot be seen or detected through visible light. Secondly, dark matter emits dark radiation with energy higher than that of UV at eV level. As the Dark renergy lies in between that of X-ray and UV, it cannot be detected by the currently available light sensors like photomultiplier tube. My sub-atomic research lasted for 21 years with radioisotopes and XRF sources led to these conclusions on dark matter and dark energy. In the context of solar flare, the predicted Bharat radiation causing UV dominant optical radiation from within excited atoms of radioisotopes by valence excitation seemed to be the familiar dark radiation from cosmic sources. As Bharat energies produced internally within an excited atom cause non-thermal valence excitation resulting into UV emission from radioisotopes at room temperature, solar EUV may take place by valence excitation of dark energies from within excited atoms of radioisotopes present in solar flare regardless of temperature. Radioisotopes, predominantly emit gamma, characteristic X-ray or beta radiation, produced in Sun cause a new class of room temperature atomic spectra of solids (radioisotopes and X-ray sources) by a previously unknown phenomenon. As in the case of the current study, the gamma-, X-, or beta radiation emissions from radioisotopes formed by fission reaction in Sun cause two more generation of emissions: the predicted dark radiation,which is the same as Bharat radiation followed by EUV. Bharat radiation emission alone takes place without accompanying UV dominant optical emission from highly ionized radionuclides left with a singly filled K shell such as tritium that can happen in a situation like nuclear fission. It is the dark matter that emits ionizing radiations (cosmic radiations) followed by dark radiation and UV dominant optical radiation. In conclusion it is the dark matter that gives us Sun light.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao,
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from
radioisotopes and XRF sources,
Brazilian Journal of Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March
2010.
http://
www.sbfisica.org.br/bjp/files/v40_38.pdf
Posted by: M.A.Padmanabha Rao, PhD | October 28, 2010 at 11:36 AM
This is to further clarify various aspects of viewing and detection of dark matter, which constitutes Uranium fission fragments (Brazilian Journal of Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March 2010) mentioned in my previous comment on October 27, 2010. Satellite images show nuclear fallout as solar flare, sometimes as whirl or spiral. Fission products (radioisotopes), neutrons, as well as gamma, X-ray, beta, EUV radiations released as a result of fission are attracted towards Earth, more towards North and South poles due to intense gravity. Gamma, X-ray, and beta emissions further cause (1) dark radiation with dark energy higher than that of UV at eV level, which in turn causes (2) UV, visible, and near infrared radiations from one and the same excited atom of radioisotopes. The dominant UV from radioisotopes (excluding those like tritium with singly filled orbit) crosses 83% while visible and infrared radiations share the rest 17% in the gross optical intensity (Refer Fig.3 in my paper). As many as 28 UV photons produced out of a single Rb X-ray within an excited atom in Rb XRF source could be detected, when gain of the bare photomultiplier 9635QB Thorn EMI was set to be slightly high. During fission, core electrons in the excited atoms of fission fragments are knocked out one after another resulting into abundant production of characteristic X-rays. That is why satellite images of Solar flare became successful through UV or X-ray and not through visible and infrared radiations, which suffer from low intensity and too much of scattering. Satellite images simply direct the location of dark material on the Sun.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao, PhD
Posted by: M.A.Padmanabha Rao,PhD | November 01, 2010 at 01:47 AM
CROSS REFERENCE
http://www.righthealth.com/topic/EUV/Opinions-and-Discussions
[...] from distance through gamma rays, X-rays, EUV or UV. It is justified to [...] emission from radioisotopes at room temperature, solar EUV may take place by valence excitation [...] same as Bharat radiation followed by EUV. Bharat radiation emission alone takes place [...] full comment
15 days ago
Read more: http://www.righthealth.com/topic/EUV/Opinions-and-Discussions#ixzz155Xp3MNx
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 11:56 — Ben Gilliland
http://www.cosmonline.co.uk/blog/2010/06/22/dark-matter-gets-even-bigger-question-mark
.M.A.Padmanabha Rao (not verified) - 09/28/2010 - 06:48
For the first time, Dark Matter in the Sun has been clearly defined in the following peer reviewed paper. Uranium fission fragments left over on the Sun constitute Dark Matter. Therefore, the dark matter can be detected through gamma rays, X-rays or beta particles, according to the following paper. Radioisotope or X-ray source emit two more successive radiations following gamma, X-ray or beta particle: (1) Bharat radiation (predicted) with energy higher than that of UV at eV level, and (2) UV dominant optical emission. The paper also explains how a previously unknown atomic phenomenon causes Bharat radiation, which in turn causes UV dominant optical emission from within an excited atom of these sources. Dark Radiation emitted by dark matter in the Sun has been attributed to Bharat radiation. Tritium is an exception that it will emit only the Bharat radiation but not UV dominant optical emission. X-ray sources can be radioisotopes that emit predominantly characteristic X-rays.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao,
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from
radioisotopes and XRF sources,
Brazilian Journal of Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March
2010.
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0103-97332010000100007&script=sci_a...
ABSTRACT
The current paper reports first and definite
experimental evidence for gamma-, X-, or beta
radiation causing UV dominant optical radiation from
(1) radiochemicals such as 131I; (2) XRF
sources such as Rb XRF source present as salts; and
(3) metal sources such as 57Co, and Cu XRF
sources. Due to low quantum yield a need arose to
develop two techniques with narrow band optical
filters, and sheet polarizers that helped in the
successful detection of optical radiation. The metal
57Co spectrum observed at room temperature
hinted that it could be optical emission from excited
57Co atoms by a previously unknown
phenomenon. In order to explain UV emission, it was
predicted that some eV energies higher than that of
UV, termed temporarily as Bharat radiation are
generated within the excited atom, while gamma-, X-,
and beta passes through core-Coulomb field. In turn,
the Bharat energy internally produced within the
excited atom causes UV dominant high-energy spectrum
by valence excitation. As excited atoms become free
from surrounding unexcited atoms by valence
excitation, room temperature atomic spectra of solid
radioisotopes and XRF sources became a possibility. It
implies existence of temporary atomic state of solids.
The experimental evidence that gamma-, X-, and beta
radiations causing UV dominant optical emission from
within excited atoms of radioisotopes suggests the
possibility for solar gamma-, X-, and ß radiations
causing EUV by the atomic phenomenon described here.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao, PhD
Former Professor of Medical Physics, New Delhi,
India
raomap@yahoo.com
Detecting Dark Matter Through Gamma Rays
August 28th, 2010, 09:47 GMT| By Tudor Vieru
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Detecting-Dark-Matter-Through-Gamma-Rays-154123.shtml
User opinions: |
||||
|
COMMENT
One thing is true that the Dark Matter can be detected through gamma rays, since Uranium fission fragments constitute Dark Matter according to the following paper. Dark radiation is described as Bharat Radiation (predicted) with energy higher than that of UV at eV level.
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from radioisotopes and XRF sources, Brazilian Journal of Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March 2010. http://www.sbfisica.org.br/bjp/files/v40_38.pdf.
Key words
Dark radiation, Bharat radiation, Radiation dose data,
Nuclear Medicine patients, radiopharmaceuticals,
99mTc, 131I, 201Tl,
diagnostic X-ray tubes, skin erythema, Teletherapy
treatment, Dark matter, fission fragments, solar flare,
Uranium fission in Sun, activation products,
56Co, and 24Na in solar flare ,
Solar EUV emission, gamma-, X-, ß, UV, VIS, and NIR
radiation emissions, radioisotopes, XRF sources, solar
flares, solar gamma-, X-, or ß radiations, solar EUV, room
temperature, new atomic phenomenon, atomic spectroscopy,
UV, VIS, NIR radiations, sheet polarizers, narrow band
optical filters, AMC 2084, Thorn/ EMI 9635 QB, gamma ray
spectrometer, electromagnetic spectrum, core electron,
core excitation, valence excitation, core coulomb space,
fluorescent emission, luminescence, incandescence.
Posted by: M.A. Padmanabha Rao | September 12, 2010 at 09:34 AM
Posted: August 2, 2010
By Ron Cowen, Science News
Uranium fission fragments in Sun constitute dark matter, according to the following research paper:
M.A. Padmanabha Rao
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from radioisotopes and XRF source,
Brazilian Journal of Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March 2010.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao @ Sep 08, 2010 13:43:20 PM
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/61683/title/Dark_matter_eldorado
Dark matter eldorado
By Ron Cowen
August 28th, 2010; Vol.178 #5 (p. 12)
M.A.Padmanabha Rao Sep. 12, 2010 at 12:01pm
The puzzling Dark radiation is precisely defined in the published paper as the Bharat radiation.
In the context of solar flare, the predicted Bharat radiation causing UV dominant optical radiation from radioisotopes and XRF sources by valence excitation seemed to be the familiar dark radiation from cosmic sources [Reference 3].
Page 45:
“As in the case of the current study, the γ-, X-, or β radiation emissions from radioisotopes formed by fission reaction in Sun cause two more generation of emissions: the predicted dark radiation, which is the same as Bharat radiation followed by EUV”.
Please peruse the accepted comments on the Dark Energy
DARK RADIATION ENERGY
NASA panel grapples with double dark energy missions - September 16, 2010
http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2010/09/nasa_panel_grapples_with_doubl.html
The puzzling Dark radiation energy is precisely defined as the Bharat radiation energy in the peer reviewed paper: Brazilian Journal of Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March 2010. Dark matter in the Sun can be detected through gamma rays, X-rays or beta particles, since Uranium fission fragments constitute Dark Matter, according to this paper. Dark radiation produced in the Sun has been attributed to Bharat radiation (predicted) with energy higher than that of UV at eV level.
Radioisotope or X-ray source emit two more radiations
following ionizing radiations such as gamma, X-ray or
beta particle: Bharat radiation (predicted) followed
by UV dominant optical emission. Location of Bharat
wavelengths from Rb XRF source is shown in
Electromagnetic Spectrum. Radioisotopes produced in
the Sun emit a new class of "Room Temperature Atomic
Spectra of Solids" (solid radioisotopes or XRF
sources). Tritium is an exception that it will emit
only the Bharat radiation but not UV dominant optical
emission. The paper also explains how a previously
unknown atomic phenomenon causes Bharat radiation,
which in turn causes UV dominant optical emission from
within an excited atom of these sources.
Posted by: M.A. Padmanabha Rao, PhD |October 6, 2010 03:06 PM
RADIATION DOSE DATA
MY COMMENTS ON MORE RADIATION DOSE FROM CT SCAN etc
by Paul Dorio, MD
http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/09/radiation-risks-ct-scans-taught-patients.html
This comment provides latest research results why CT scan and other ionizing radiation sources cause more radiation dose to patients than expected. Ionizing radiation sources emit two more emissions, according to the following peer reviewed paper. X-rays (say from CT scanner, X-ray tube etc), gamma rays, and beta radiations are followed by Bharat radiation (predicted) having energy higher than that of UV at eV level, and the newly detected UV dominant optical radiation. While UV from CT scanner may subject the patients to higher skin dose than previously thought, Bharat radiation does to skin and outer layers of the body. The UV emission from CT scanner, radioisotopes and XRF sources has bearing in radiation biology in contributing more radiation dosage to patients of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine than expected. Radiation dose data may need entry of UV as one more component, besides ionizing radiations in giving radiation dose to the patients. Bharat radiation and UV can be cut off from CT scaner by introducing a very thin Aluminium sheet or some other dark and thick material in the X-ray beam. Presently, Bharat radiation cannot be detected by any commercially avaialble detectors like Photomultiplier tube, since Bharat radiation energy lies in between X-rays and UV or EUV.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao,
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from
radioisotopes and XRF sources,
Brazilian Journal of Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March
2010.
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0103-97332010000100007&script=sci_arttext
M.A. Padmanabha Rao, PhD
Former Professor of Medical Physics, New Delhi, India
raomap@yahoo.com
By Julie Steenhuysen
CHICAGO | Wed Sep 15, 2010 2:47am EDT
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE68E0OV20100915
Sep 29, 2010 1:31am EDT
This comment on “High radiation raises risk of second cancer” provides latest research results why ionizing radiations give more radiation dose to exposed persons than expected. Ionizing radiations particularly gamma, X-ray, and beta radiations successively cause two more emissions:(1) Bharat radiation (predicted) with energy higher than that of UV at eV level, and the (2) newly detected UV dominant optical radiation, according to the following peer reviewed paper. It is to be kept in mind that some radioisotopes emit predominantly characteristic X-rays. While UV from these sources subject the exposed persons to higher skin dose than previously thought, Bharat radiation does to skin and outer layers of the body. Radiation dose data may need entry of UV as one more component, besides ionizing radiations in giving radiation dose to the exposed persons. Presently, Bharat radiation cannot be detected by any commercially available detectors like Photomultiplier tube, since Bharat energy lies in between that of X-rays and UV or EUV. In the case of atomic bomb explosion, UV, EUV, and Bharat radiations also contribute to cancer risk, besides neutrons, and ionizing radiations. It also happens that most core electrons of the fission fragments may be knocked out of the atom, so as to be left with a singly filled orbit as in the case of Tritium. Such highly ionized fission fragments emit only the Bharat Radiation and not the UV dominant optical emission.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao,
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from
radioisotopes and XRF sources,
Brazilian Journal of Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March
2010.
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0103-97332010000100007&script=sci_arttext
October 29th, 2009 | Author: admin
M.A. Padmanabha Rao, PhD says:
There are reasons why pilots get more radiation dosage while traveling over countries near North Pole such as the Iceland. Earth’s gravitational force attracts high energy radiations both ionizing (including gamma, X-ray, and beta) and non ionizing radiation like EUV or UV arising from Sun. How gravitational force acts on radiation and matter is explained in the following. In physics, some missing gaps still exist. My experimental and subatomic research with radioisotopes and XRF sources has revealed that beta does not exhibit its well known particle behavior within an excited atom of a radioisotope or X-ray source.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao,
UV dominant optical emission newly detected from
radioisotopes and XRF sources,
Brazilian Journal of Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March 2010.
http://www.sbfisica.org.br/bjp/files/v40_38.pdf
I believe when beta escapes from an excited atom, beta acquires mass due to Earth’s gravitational attraction. It is because gravitational force shows attraction on both matter and radiation. For example, abundant cosmic radiation from Sun such as gamma, X-ray, beta, as well as EUV at North and South poles are due to attraction by Earth’s high gravitational force. In tropical countries such as India relatively less energetic radiations including visible light and infra red radiation from Sun are due to Earth’s relatively low gravitational force. All such examples lead to an entirely new concept that both matter (such as electrons, protons, neutrons) and radiation (conceptually both photons and waves) consist of three components: (a) electric, (b) magnetic, and (c) gravitational forces. In a particular situation only one component is in excess, so influences accordingly on electron or photon. This needs a detailed explanation.
THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE APPEARED IN INDIAN DAILY : INDIA TODAY
Concrete step to stop scrapyard radiation. http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Concrete+step+to+stop+scrapyard+radiation.-a0228856096
COBALT- 60 MORE UNSAFE THAN THOUGHT
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/COBALT-+60+MORE+UNSAFE+THAN+THOUGHT.-a0228856095
COBALT- 60, whose radiation killed a worker at West
Delhi's Mayapuri scrap market recently, may be more
harmful than earlier thought.
A research report by a scientist has revealed that
radioisotopes such as Cobalt- 60 emit Ultraviolet ( UV)
dominant optical rays.
The report shows that metallic sources such as cobalt- 57
and cobalt- 60 emit a " new class of atomic spectra of
solids at room temperature". The UV emission may,
therefore, be contributing to the skin
erythemaerythema (ĕr'əthē`mə), more or less
diffuse redness of the skin due to concentration of an
abnormally large amount of blood within the small vessels
of the skin (hyperemia), as in burns. noticed in
cancer patients during cobalt- 60 teletherapy
treatment.
Erythema is ' reddening' of the skin because of
inflammatory or immunologic processes.
Irradiationirradiation /ir·ra·di·a·tion/
(i-ra?de-a´shun)
1. radiotherapy.
2. the dispersion of nervous impulse beyond the
normal path of conduction.
3. leads to accumulation of
lymphocytesLymphocytes
Small white blood cells that bear the major
responsibility for carrying out the activities of the
immune system; they number about 1 trillion.
..... Click the link for more information. in
the layers of the skin caused by cell death.
" Cobalt- 60 can be more harmful to a patient exposed to
it during cancer treatment. Doctors should use a sheet of
black paper between the radiation machine and the
patient," said Dr M. A. Padmanabha Rao, who conducted the
research.
Rao is former head of the Radiation Safety Group and
deputy director at the Defence Laboratory in Jodhpur. His
study is published in the recent issue of the Brazilian
Journal of Physics.
In 1997, Rao had first reported the discovery of an
atomic phenomenon causing light emission from sources of
ionising radiation in the official technical report of the
DRDO's Defence Laboratory.
Dr.M.A.Padmanabha Rao (Member): COBALT- 60
MORE UNSAFE THAN THOUGHT 7/6/2010 11:29 PM
The present article is cited from my research paper “UV
dominant optical emission newly detected from
radioisotopes and XRF sources” published in Brazilian
Journal of Physics,Vol.40,no.1,March 2010.
http://www.sbfisica.org.br/bjp/files/v40_38.pdf.
Incredibly, this single paper accounts to six fundamental
physics discoveries. Cobalt-60 serves in treating cancer
patients (Radiotherapy) by virtue of its gamma emission.
Now, the current study reveals that Cobalt-60 emits two
more emissions. Gamma rays are followed by Bharat
radiation (predicted) having energy higher than that of UV
at eV level, and the newly detected UV dominant optical
radiation. While UV contributes radiation dose to skin,
Bharat radiation does to skin and outer layers of the
body.
M.A. Padmanabha Rao, PhD
Former Professor of Medical Physics (2001)
Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Jollygrant,
Uttarnchal
Former Deputy Director, Defence Laboratory, Jodhpur,
Rajasthan, India (1983-1997)
Former Lecturer, Department of Nuclear Medicine, All
India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
(1964-1983)
Assembly Member, World Federation of Nuclear Medicine and
Biology, Tokyo , 1974
And Chaired an Instrument session during First World
Congress of Nuclear Medicine, Tokyo , 1974.
Current
Address: 114 Charak Sadan, Vikaspuri, New
Delhi 110018, India
Ph:91-9871257964 e-mail:
raomap@yahoo.com
RESUME
Birth Place
Vemuluru, Kovvuru Mandalam, West Godavary District, Andhra Pradesh
to parents Manchiraju Veerraju (father) and Manchiraju Durgamba (mother)
QUALIFICATIONS B.Sc Degree with Physics Main, and Mathematics and Chemistry as subsidiaries in 1960 from Government Arts College, Rajahmundry, under Andhra University, Waltair. M.Sc Physics ( with specialization in Electronics), Vikram University, Ujjain, M.P. in 1962 Radiological Physics training course for one year (1963-1964) from Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai, India. Ph.D. (AIIMS) Degree from the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 11018 in 1975 The doctoral thesis is on Performance of Digital Scanner with reference to Tomoscanning and Scatter Photon scan techniques Thesis submitted in 1973 and Degree was awarded as Ph.D (A.I.I.M.S) through Biophysics in 13th Convocation held in 1975, Official guide: Prof. R.K. Misra, first Head of the Department of Biophysics at AIIMS. The Ph.D work on Scatter Photon scanning brought rare international honor. World Federation of Nuclear Medicine and Biology invited me to represent India as Assembly Member in its World Federation, and Asian Federation meetings held at Tokyo in 1974, and to lead Indian team of scientists and Doctors and to the First World Congress of Nuclear Medicine held at Tokyo in September 1974. |
Receiving Ph.D Degree in the 13th A.I.I.M.S. Convocation held in 1975 from Dr.Karan Singh, the then President of A.I.I.M.S, and Health Minister
Memento received as Assembly Member from India to the World Federation of Nuclear Medicine and Biology, Tokyo, 1974 |
|
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi nearly 19 years:May 1, 1964- March 1983) | |
POSITIONS HELD 1 . Demonstrator in Isotope Laboratory [ May 1, '64 to Dec’ 31, 1969 ] (Standing and watching while doing 131 I Thyroid uptake test by Mr.Lal Singh: top, left). This photo is from Illustrated Weekly of India. (1965-1966). 2. Physicist in Isotope Laboratory [ Dec’ 31, '69 to Sept’ 3, 1971] 3 . Lecturer in Medical physics Department of Nuclear Medicine [Sept' 3, 1971 to Feb 12, 1983] T eaching to M.D. Students Medical Physics of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Safety to M.D.students of Radiodiagnosis, Medicine, Biophysics etc. Research guidance Co - guide to M.Ch students of 1. Neurosurgery (Dr. J.Dhar, Dr.B.S.Das) 2. Paediatric surgery (H.L.Goswamy) 3. Urology (Dr. N.S.Dutta, Dr.A. K. Chakravarty, Dr. D.Umaraiya , Dr. S.N. Wadwa, Dr.Lakshmikant Sahu)for their dissertations on topics of clinical Nuclear Medicine, while their Professors were full guides. Did research and published several papers (Refer the list of publications) Radiation Safety Officer (AIIMS Hospital) where patients were admitted for treatment of thyroid cancer. I have administered even 100 mCi of 131 I orally to such patients. Developed various radiation shields with novel ideas. |
|
Joined Defence Laboratory, Jodhpur, Rajasthan in 1983
worked nearly 14 years Mar 1983- Sept 1997
1. Scientist D [March 10, '83 to June 30, '92]
2. Deputy Director (Scientist E) & Head, Radiation Safety Group
[ July 1, '92 to Sept 30, 1997]
RETIRED from Government service on 30 Sept’ 1997.
Professor of Medical Physics ( 3 months: August 2001 to Dec 4, 2001),
Department of Radiology,
Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Jolly Grant , Uttaranchal, India.
Teaching:
Final year M.B.B.S students onon X ray physics, use of radioisotopes in medicine (Nuclear Medicine),
Clinical and surgical management of cases affected byradioactive contamination in Nuclear accidents or nuclear bombing etc.
RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS on CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE
All India Institute of Medical Sciences , New Delhi (1964 -1983)
Thyroid gland
1. M.M.S. Ahuja and M.A. Padmanabha Rao: 1. Isopropylimidazolidines 2-thione: clinical evaluation of a new antithyroid drug. Ind.Jour.Med.Res . 57, 8, 1486-1489, Aug 1969.
2. A.K.Basu , D.Ghosh, M.A.P.Rao, K.K. Malhotra:Scintiscanning in primary carcinoma of thyroid and its metastasis, Qtly.J.Surg.Sci , Vol 5, No 2 & 3, 127-138, Jun-Sep 1969.
3. Padmanabha Rao. M.A.: 131 I serial scanning over thyroid as a method to differentiate adenomatous goitre from follicular carcinoma of thyroid- a preliminary report (in) proceedings of the Vth Asia and Oceania Congress of Endocrinology, Chandigarh, 185-191,1974.
4. Padmanabha Rao. M. A.: Influence of thyroid functional status on gastric emptying in human subjects (in) Proceedings of the XXVI International Congress of International Union of Physiological Sciences, Vol XI, New Delhi, 392, 1974.
No effect of Chernobyl accident (1986) on Indian human thyroids
M. A. Padmanabha Rao, M. R. Patel, B.N.Vishnoi, S.R.Vadera, Monitoring for 131 I in human thyroids following Chernobyl accident, Bulletin of Radiation Protection 10, No. 1-2, 89-92 (1987).
5. M.A. Padmanabha Rao , and R.K. Mishra. A comparative study of anterior and posterior scans of the thyroid gland in nodular goitres , Ind. Jour. Med. Res. 71, 621-626, April 1980. In the picture on the right, the differences between anterior and posterior views. of three cases with goitre have been demonstrated for the first time, using digital scanner made in Gamma Works, Hungary. |
|
Started the Renogram test at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi in collaboration with Urology Department as diagnostic test in renal diseases.
Renal diseases
1. S.M.Singh, N.S. Dutta, M.A.P.Rao : Radioisotope renography in Urology, Ind. Jour.Med. Res. 57, 8, 1490-1506, Aug 1969.
2. S.M.Singh, N.S. Dutta, B.C. Bapna, and M.A.P. Rao: Radioisotope renography in acute renal failure.Ind.J.Med.Res, 57, 10, 1969-1974, Oct 1969.
3. S.M. Singh, A. K. Chakravarty, B.C. Bapna, and M.A.P. Rao and S. K. Sharma, kidney, ureter and bladder scanning with hippuran- 131 I, Ind. J. Radiology , Vol XXVI, 1,38-39,1972.
4. S.M. Singh, A.K. Chakravarty, B.C. Bapna and M.A.P. Rao: Blood clearance of Hippuran-131 I as an index of overall renal function, Ind.J.Med.Res. 59, 83-89, Jan 1971.
5. D.Umaraiya ; N.P. Gupta; M.A. Padmanabha Rao; S.N. Wadwa, S.M. Singh, The Diuresis renogram: A non-invasive method of evaluating equivocal urinary tract obstruction, Ind. Jour. Surg. Vol 45,No4, 215-220, April 1983.
In India, started isotopic means of detection of intracranial lesions (Brain tumors) and ‘imaging for imaging CSF pathways’: in patients of hydrocephalus, spina bifida etc with radioisotope ventriculography, cisternography, myelography in collaboration with Neurosurgery and Paediatric Surgery Departments at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (A.I.I.M.S.), New Delhi in 1968 :
NEUROLOGY & NEUROSURGERY
1. Tandon . P.N; Rao. M.A.P ; Pathak.S.N; Dhar.J: RIHSA Cisternography in the management of tuberculosis meningitis: Monographs on tuberculosis of the nervous system, Ann of Ind. Acad Med. Sciences, 55-57, 1972. 2. Tandon.P.N; Rao, M.A.P ; Basu.A.K; Dhar.J; and Das.B.S.: 131 I RIHSA C.S.F scanning in paediatric neurosurgical practice, Neuroradiology, 7:119-123, 1974. Cited by Springrlink http://www.springerlink.com/ (bh41tc55jfkjtf45lmny1030)/app/home/contribution.asp? Summary Sixty children aged between one month and fifteen years were submitted to RIHSA cisternography and/or ventriculography for a variety of lesions affecting the CSF pathways. These included cases of hydrocephalus and other congenital malformations of the central nervous system, posttraumatic and post meningitic sequelae. The investigation has been found to be valuable not only in differentiating between arrested and progressive hydrocephalus but also in unmasking associated anomalies of CSF flow and pathways in cases of meningomyelocele and encephalocele. It is excellent for delineating a CSF fistula and can also be utilised to demonstrate the size and extent of a subdural hematoma or hygroma. Pathological concentration and delayed clearance of the isotope in the region underlying the skull defect was a consistent finding in all cases of growing fracture (craniocerebral erosion). Single or multiple sites of blocks were observed in cases of postmeningitic (tuberculous) sequelae. Energy Ctations Database :Identifier: OSTI ID: 4104749 Neurosciences in India: An overview
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat -
View as HTML 131 I-RIHSA CSF scanning in pediatric neurosurgical practice
PN Tandon, MAP Rao, AK Basu, J Dar, BS … -
Neuroradiology, 1974 - Springer Summary Sixty children aged between one month and fifteen years were submitted to RIHSA cisternography and/or ventriculography for a variety of lesions affecting the CSF pathways. These included cases of hydrocephalus and other congenital malformations of the central nervous system, posttraumatic and post meningitic sequelae. The investigation has been found to be valuable not only in differentiating between arrested and progressive hydrocephalus but also in unmasking associated anomalies of CSF flow and pathways in cases of meningomyelocele and encephalocele. It is excellent for delineating a CSF fistula and can also be utilised to demonstrate the size and extent of a subdural hematoma or hygroma. Pathological concentration and delayed clearance of the isotope in the region underlying the skull defect was a consistent finding in all cases of growing fracture (craniocerebral erosion). Single or multiple sites of blocks were observed in cases of postmeningitic (tuberculous) sequelae. Cited by 2
1.
Cranio-cerebral erosion (growing fracture of
the skull in children)
|
NEW TECHNIQUES DEVELOPEDon Imaging of objects or the body by backscatter photon scattering: A CHAPTER IN A RESEARCH PUBLICATION IN ISRAEL
Padmanabha Rao. M.A; Basu.A.K; and Mishra.R.K.: Scatter-Photon scan and scatter -emission scan techniques, and their related studies (in) Awards in Nuclear Medicine and Radiopharmacology, Vol. 3. Eds: P.Czerniak et al. Baruk Inst. for Radiological Research, Tel Aviv University, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Hashomer (Israel)-1975.
Padmanabha Rao. M.A.: Simultaneous visualization of an active organ and surface around it by scintiscanning,(in) Proceedings of the First Congress of Nuclear Medicine, Tokyo, 1284-1286, 1974.
In this technique the isotope was kept at the edge of collimator so that scintillation detector will receive only scattered gamma rays (below).
|
Image of head when scanned, and again after brain has accumulated some radiopharmaceutical injected inside the body so that position of radioactivity can be seen with respect to brain or skull |
3. M.A. Padmanabha Rao.: Compton's back-scattered photon spectra of different scatter materials and a new technique for imaging objects with back-scattered photons and characteristic X-rays, Jour. Mysore Univ. Sec-B Science. Proceedings of the National Symposium on Radiation, Vol No XXVI, 394-402, June 1976.
4. M.A. Padmanabha Rao.: Gammamotogram- A technique for recording Acilles tendon refluxes (in) Digest of International Symposium. Biomed.Engg, New Delhi, 148-149, 1978.
Another significant scientific accomplishment
Defence Laboratory (DRDO, Ministry of Defence), Jodhpur, Rajasthan State has procured earlier the Radioactive Gas Monitor RGM1 from Nuclear Enterprises, U.K. intended for tritium monitoring. The Chernobyl Reactor accident occurred on 26 April 1986 but appeared in Indian Dailies two or three days later. On the fourth day of Chernobyl Reactor accident, 30th April 1986, me and my colleague Kanaram Senwar tried to see whether this monitor really detects any radioactivity from Chernobyl. Such type of accidents were not heard of taking place in Asia in my life time. We were not sure what kind of activity can be detected 2000 km away in India. Surprisingly, the monitor RGM1 showed sudden surge of radioactivity never seen before April 1986, but persisted in atmosphere even in 1987. We were unsure what exactly the the tritium monitor has detected. Subsequently, a scientist from Canada India Reactor helped me in interpreting the data. He disclosed that the monitor has detected 133Xe, 85Kr and 131I in gaseous form (peruse Abstract here).
M.A.Padmanabha Rao and fellow
colleague Kanaram Senwar
of the Defence Laboratory (Defence Research and Development Organization,
Ministry of Defence), Jodhpur, Rajasthan State were the only scientists in India who reported
detection of gaseous
atmospheric activity from
|
|
The following one is the copy of the above picture in black.
The following data reveals a fall in gaseous activity two years after the Chernobyl
Reactor accident in Indian atmosphere at Jodhpur in Rajasthan State in 1988 and 1989 as compared to the levels in 1986 and 1987.
No effect of Chernobyl accident on Indian human thyroids.
On testing the thyroid gland of some normal persons with well collimated scintillation detector keeping slightly away from the throid, as is the practice in Nuclear Medicine, no detectable 131I from Chernobyl reactor accident was noticed (However, trace quantities of 131I was reported by BARC scientists when intro testing was done on goats thyroids).
M. A. Padmanabha Rao, M. R. Patel, B.N.Vishnoi, S.R.Vadera, Monitoring for 131 I in human thyroids following Chernobyl accident, Bulletin of Radiation Protection 10, No. 1-2, 89-92 (1987).
A NEW TECHNIQUE FORCOPYING OF NEUROANGIOGRAPHY IMAGES: M.A. Padmanabha Rao.: A techniques for copying X-ray images by Xerographic process, Ind. J. Radiol, No 34, No 4, Nov 1980.
Citation Index Medicus for South-East Asia Region (IMSEAR): Summary: A technique for copying X-ray image by xerographic process was developed. A comparison between xerographic copy and photocopy of aselective internal carotid angiogram showing arterial phase revealedenchanced contrast of arteries in xerographic copy. The currenttechnique is simple, has easy access, high speed, and foremost of allenhanced contrast over a photocopy. The versatility of the techniqueover other is discussed. Subjects: ID: IMSEAR000701 Maintained by: International Nuclear Information System (INIS) A technique for copying X-ray image by xerographic process Padmanabha Rao, M. A. Indian J. Radiol. (Nov 1980). v. 34(4) p. 314-316 1980-01-01 A technique for copying X-ray image by xerographic process was developed. A comparison between xerographic copy and photocopy of a selective internal carotid angiogram showing arterial phase revealed enhanced contrast of arteries in xerogra… |
PAPERS PUBLISHED at DEFENCE LABORATORY, JODHPUR after March 1983
The chapter describes a methodology as how to select the best scintillator for making plastic scintillator:
M. A. Padmanabha Rao , M.R.Patel, Beta excitation of a organic scintillator in powder form in "Luminescence: Phenomena Materials and Devices, (Ed) R.P.Rao, Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York , 1991. [ Find in a Library: Luminescence : phenomena, materials, and devices .. . and devices • Author: R P Rao • Publisher: Commack, N ... Trojan, M . Kaplanova and M . M . Rao -- Electroluminescence of ... powder form /耟 o and M . R . Patel . •. Library ... http://www.worldcatlibraries.org/wcpa/ow/72d19a9837144226a19afeb4da09e526.html ]
M.A. Padmanabha Rao , The rise in incidence of tuberculosis attributable to radiation exposure: its consequences and suggestions. Rad. Prot. Dosim(UK), 35, No 4, 272-273 (1991).
Made ‘thick scintillator ‘ equal in performance with the British make:
M. A. Padmanabha Rao , M.R.Patel, A comparision of performance of Plastic Scintillator developed at Jodhpur with that from NE (U.K.) in beta detection, Proceedings of the 8th National Symposium on Radiation physics, Bombay, pp.180-183, 17-19 January, 1990.
Plastic Scintillator (P.S.) made by Nuclear Enterprises, U.K.(left, top); P.S. made by Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai (top, right); P.S. made by me and M.R.Patel at Defence Laboratory, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India |
Thin Plastic Scintillator made by Nuclear Enterprises, U.K. (left). Thin Plastic Scintillator made by me and M.R.Patel at Defence Laboratory, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India (right) |
Made better ‘Thin Scintillator’ than the British make:
M. A. Padmanabha Rao , M. R. Patel, Superior performance of a Thin Film Scintillator developed here over the Thin Plastic Scintillator from NE (U.K), Proceedings of the 8th National Symposium on Radiation physics, Bombay, pp.180-183, 17-19 January, 1990.
M.A.Padmanabha Rao, Dinesh Bohra, and Arvind Parihar, Comparison of light gain over charge gain measurements with the Berthold Tritium Surface Contamination Monitor, Bulletin of Radiation Protection (Bull Rad. Prot.) Vol 13, No 1, Jan-Mar,1990 .
International Nuclear Information System (INIS)
Padmanabha Rao, M. A.; Bohra, Dinesh; Parihar, Arvind, Bull. Radiat. Prot. (Jan-Mar 1990). v. 13(1) p. 39-42 1990-01-01
Berthold Tritium Surface Contamination Monitor LB 1210 B is a portable instrument that consists of a gas flow probe LB 6255, a P-10 gas cylinder, and a battery operated ratemeter. An investigation has been made in the current study to see w…
Novel use of gas flow proportional counter from Germany
M. A. Padmanabha Rao, Dinesh Bohra, Arvind Parihar, M.R.Patel, Use of a Gas flow proportional counter in the identification certain beta and alpha emitters, Bull. Rad. Prot. 13, No. 3 & 4, 26-30 (1990).
Paper published on Photomutiplier as a beta sensor a fact unknown for half a century, since its invention:
Dinesh Bohra, Arvind Parihar, M. A. Padmanabha Rao, Photomultiplier as a beta sensor, Jour. of Nucl.Inst.and Meth. A 320 (1992) 393-395. https://www.angelfire.com/sc3/1010/pmt.html ;
Smithsonian/NASA ADS Physics Abstract Service
Publication Date:
DOI:
Electronic Article Available from
Elsevier
Science.
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=1992NIMPA.320..393B&db_key=PHY#feedback
International Nuclear Information System
(INIS)
The photomultiplier as a beta detector
Bohra, D.; Parihar, A.; Padmanabha Rao, M.
A.
Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A. (15
Aug 1992). v. 320(1/2) p. 393-395 1992-01-01
Investigation on the photomultiplier (PM) 9635QB
from Thorn EMI connected to a preamplifier
revealed that it itself serves as an independent
detector for external beta activity of which the
performance has not been investigated by others
si…
***********************************************************************************
M.A. Padmanabha Rao, UV dominant optical emission newly detected from radioisotopes and XRF sources, Brazilian Journal of Physics, Vol.40, no.1, March 2010. http:// www.sbfisica.org.br/bjp/files/v40_38.pdf .