PROOF OF INTELLIGENT DESIGN

1. Obvious Design
It is obvious that the universe, the galaxy, the solar system, the Earth, every law of physics, down to the smallest protons and electrons were designed especially to fit perfectly for life. If evolution is supposedly still taking place, getting rid of the useless systems of our body, why is it that human bodies function in perfect order and harmony? It seems that our bodies are built perfectly, and there is no indication that our bodies were ever worse than they are today (in fact there is no evidence of any kind of remains linking us to apes).

2. Solar System has Just the Right Conditions
Was it a mistake that if the Earth were to slow down, only about 9% or so, that life would be impossible, and if it were to speed up, life would also be impossible? And was it a mistake that if the sun were to move just a matter of miles closer to the Earth than it is now, that everything would burn? Or is it by pure chance that if the sun were to move away from the Earth by a matter of miles that everything would freeze? And if the Moon were too close, the gravitational pull of the satellite would move the tides across the entire continent, making it impossible for humans to live. The amount of oxygen on Earth is the exact amount needed for all living creatures and humans. The same goes for gravity. If the gravity were just a little bit more, we would all die, and if the gravity were lessened, we would lose most of our water or we would just fly off into space and suffocate. Coincidence? Certainly not! It is very clear that the Earth was designed especially for humans to live in.

3. Just Enough Stars
Some may wonder why God only created Earth for humans and didn't use any other star systems to support life. But all of those stars out there are necessary. They all work together. There is just enough stars in the universe that keeps our sun alive. If there were too many stars, our sun would have been sucked of its life, but if there weren't enough stars, our sun could have never been given its life in the first place.

4. Universe Supports Design
The universe is expanding at a tremendous rate, but did you know that if it were expanding too fast, solar systems would not be able to form? And if it were expanding too slow, the gravity would be much too hefty and the universe would have "flopped apart". The rate at which the universe is growing is exact for the amount of gravity needed, and the ability to form new stars.

5. Evolution Depends on Space Aliens!
In his book, "The Creation Evolution Controversy", Dr. R.L. Wyson, an expert on Evolutionism, admits that "If evolution is true and is an all-pervading universal process...then it is eminently reasonable for the Universe to be abundant in intelligent civilizations (10 or more are estimated). Some of these would more than likely be far more advanced than ours...A natural consequence of belief in extraterrestrial life is an attempt toward communication. Evolutionists have followed through with this by spending massive amounts of money and almost countless hours in research devoted to devising codes and exquipment to send and receive messages...So if evolution is true we should expect extraterrestrial life." So, if evolution were to be true, we, as Dr. Wysong said, "should expect extraterrestrial life". Now let's look at the detailed design of the Earth and figure the probability of their being life on another planet, let alone the chances of life arising by chance on Earth. According to Dr. Hugh Ross, it is a fact that the probability of one planet being able to sustain life, let alone intelligent life such as human beings, would be .000000000000000000000001%. That is one trillionth of a trillionth. So, out of a trillion-trillion planets, there should only be one planet capable of sustaining life. Now, we should note that there are not even two trillion stars capable of having planetary systems. The odds are totally against the Earth having life, so why should we expect other planets to have it. And if Evolution depends on extra terrestrial life to back its case, then it looks like Evolution is sunk.

6. DNA and RNA Disprove Evolution
The one problem with life arising without any One to set it in motion, is the DNA-RNA problem. DNA contains the instructions for how to build the body, for all the functions, and for life in general. But the only problem is that to get the DNA to work, it must be used under RNA. DNA is like a video tape, and RNA is like a VCR. The problem with that is that the instructions on how to build the RNA are with the other instructions in the DNA. If evolution were to be true, that would mean that there were no VCR's at the beginning of life, but there was a video tape that contained showed how to make a VCR. But with no VCR to play the tape, you can never get the instructions out of the video tape. This proves that Evolution is simply preposterous. It would be impossible to reproduce cells if Evolution were to be true.

7. Smarter Than a Supercomputer
The simplest (or most complex, should I say) things like the brain and the eye are actually far more intricate than can be ever imagined! The eye can process more information in a second than a Cray Supercomputer can process in one hundred years! And the brain, has 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 connections which all work in perfect order, each one just as important to sustaining life. The intricate and delicate patterns of our body our too amazing to have been created by chance.

8. We Can't Do It By Ourselves
Yes, we have been able to clone many different animals with somewhat success, but the fact is that no matter how hard we try to "create" life on our own, (which all we're really doing is making offspring look like a twin to their parents), there are constantly abnormalities resulting in non-functional organs, and deformities in clones.

9. Brain Proves Intelligent Design
It is not uncommon to find that some people who suffer a mental blockage of one area of the brain, will often display genius-like ability in other parts of the brain. We all have the potential to be amazingly brilliant in any subject, but our brains are usually overcome with other functions to carry out that those genius abilities cannot be displayed unless some room is freed. The problem for Evolutionists with this is, that, according to Evolution, this is not necessary for immediate survival (natural selection). Why would such things like this be able if natural selection focuses on physical aspects?

10. Music or Noise? Evolution Can't Decide
In the "Broca's area" of our brian, we have the ability to distinguish between noise and music. But if natural selection were true, than what would be that signficance? Surely, we were designed specifically by God, and not by picking and choosing physical aspects that work.

11. We Still Just Really Can't Do It!
For years, scientists around the world have been trying to synthesize primitive life to prove that Evolution could have really happened. They've been trying to get life to evolve in their premade, better-than-normal environments. But still, with all of their technology, they can't get it to work. If humans with all of our technology today can't make Evolution work, it is impossible for Evolution to have happened naturally by chance. Life as we know it requires a higher than usual intelligent design. And the answer has been sitting in the Bible for millenia before Darwin.

12. Genders
Ray Comfort, in his tract: "Evolution: The Evidence For and Against", "Notice that almost all forms of complex life have both male and female--horses, cats, dogs, humans, moths, monkeys, fish, elephants, etc. The male needs the female to reproduce, and female needs the male to reproduce. One cannot carry on life without the other. Which then came first according to the evolutionary theory? If the males came before the females, how did the males of each species appear without the females? If you believe that perhaps, maybe, probably, possibly, male and female evolved over a long period of time, what then made evolution change its initial plan and require the necessity of male and female?"

13. Fish and Gills:
Ray Comfort also states in his tract "Evolution: The Evidence For And Against", "There is another little problem for evolutionists. Did the first fish that crawled onto dry land millions of years ago have lungs or gills? If he had gills, he would have gasped and died the moment he crawled onto dry land. If he had lungs, why did he evolve them while he was in the ocean? Also, he had to find a female (to carry on the species) who had also crawled onto the land, and she would have had to have evolved lungs also."