Saved-Worlds Score: Men in Black 2, FBI 0
by James J Keene PhD
Editor's Note: This report is my New Year's gift to my kidnapped children.
Trenton, NJ - Jan 6, 2005 A Ross University School of Medicine receptionist in the Commonwealth of Dominica took a phone message on April 17, 2003: "To: James Keene ... From: Mr. Mulligan (FBI Agent). Message: Please call Mr. Mulligan or Mr. Chew as soon as possible. Ref: your children. Thank you."
Better Late Than Never?
What happens when a victim parent of the kidnapping of children receives an urgent message from the FBI eight years later?
Short answer: The parent is up all night filled with worry. What happened? Are the children all right? Were they found? Are they in danger?
A neighbor returning from work at Ross University hand-delivered this phone message slip to me. It was already night, after business hours. More or less in a panic, I placed several calls trying to reach these FBI agents to no avail, except to leave my home phone number.
The FBI had "arrived on the scene" eight years later.
Maybe Never is Better Than Late
Or was this just another chapter in a story of law enforcement failure? Keene Kids News stories recount failure to nab the Davis-Flores kidnap gang in spite of rock-solid evidence of international child kidnapping, serial interstate child kidnapping in the United States, perjury and child abuse, for starters.
An educational story, indeed. We learn that cocaine may be more important than kidnapped children for Federal District Attorneys. That state and local police may ignore missing children reports and thereby violate Federal law. Instead of making arrests, the FBI may tell the victim parent what to do -- namely, do all the work for them.
A story of law enforcement failure going way beyond mere "KeyStone Cops" incompetence, suggesting active violation of law by police and even possible support by authorities of a child kidnapping gang.
In the morning, internet activities which usually keep my phone line busy 24/7 were taken off line. Tick. Tick. I awaited a call from the FBI.
Ring
Enter FBI Special Agent Mulligan. His first point was "the many bad things" on the Missing Keene Kids web site. I assumed he was talking about previous law enforcement failures cited -- book, chapter and verse on the web site.
In a lengthy phone conversation with this worried parent, FBI agent Mulligan seemed to be all those good things one might expect from the Bureau. He wanted to know what I wanted to do in this case and many options were discussed.
Mr. Mulligan also stated that he was unable to locate the Arrest Warrant for Nilda Davis-Flores. I offered to fax to him a copy. Did he want to gather evidence on this and other violations of the law? I offered concrete evidence. Apparently he did not want it. This was suspicious, and confirmed in the email transcript below. He never requested evidence that I described to him.
By the time he had repeated the "many bad things" phrase several times, it started to dawn on me that his concern was not the same as mine -- justice, safety of my children and the like.
FBI agent Mulligan tried to convince me that the interstate child kidnapping in this case was not a violation of law. In sum, his repeated themes were "many bad things on the web site" and interstate child kidnapping "is not illegal".
I was up all night worrying about my kidnapped, missing children so an FBI agent could tell me that he did not like my web site and that child kidnapping is legal. For this, the FBI wanted me to "Please call Mr. Mulligan or Mr. Chew as soon as possible. Ref: your children". Maybe the FBI thought I was an idiot. Maybe I was an idiot, so to speak, to think the FBI may have had good news which I eagerly awaited.
Who Does the FBI Work For?
In this story of child kidnapping, it now seems that the FBI stepped in, not to rectify previous law enforcement failures, but rather to suppress a web site and convince a crime victim that really there was no crime. Who does Mr. Mulligan work for? The kidnappers? Was his urgent phone message just an effort to convince me, as politely as possible, to shut up? Is FBI agent Chew on the same wave length as Mulligan? Are they both on a "shut up" team?
Is Mulligan's message: "Law enforcement did not fail because there were no crimes"? All those serving time for child kidnapping, perjury and the like should be released from prison, according to the FBI?
Email Transcript
Perhaps adding insult to injury, the following email transcripts show how "hot" Mr. Mulligan was to contact me. In this case, "management" of crime victims may be a FBI priority. Since I was off the internet waiting for his phone call, I did not see until later that Mr. Mulligan had sent four copies of an email to me.
At first, I assumed Mr. Mulligan was doing a "real" investigation. But it became apparent that he was not interested in real evidence and information, as shown in the email transcript below. I finally "got the idea" and decided not to waste time sending to him emails which received no acknowledgement.
In the following transcript, "..." indicates omitted text. Italics indicate comments inserted for this article.
To: freepress@myrealbox.com
Subject: NILDA KEENE
From: trenton2@fbi.gov
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 10:00:54 -0400
JAMES J. KEENE
Sir,
My name is JOHN MULLIGAN, and I am an FBI Agent currently
assigned to the Trenton, NJ office. It has been brought to our
attention that you claim your former wife, NILDA DAVIS-FLORES
KEENE, has kidnaped your children, and that an arrest warrant has
been issued for her, charging her with kidnaping.
Our investigation has revealed that no such warrant is in
effect, either in the United States or elsewhere. I have been
instructed by our Legal Attache in Barbados to inform you, that
if you wish to pursue obtaining legal custody of your children,
as a U.S. Citizen, you must travel to the United States and
litigate the matter civilly in a U.S. Court.
I have attempted to contact you through the Ross University
School of Medicine in Dominica, but was advised that you are no
longer employed there, and that you have no home phone. If you
have any questions or wish to contact me, you may do so by e-mail
at trenton2@fbi.gov.
Sincerely,
SA JOHN MULLIGAN
The above message was sent four times:
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 10:13:04 -0400
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 10:15:56 -0400
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 10:47:44 -0400
Yes, Special Agent Mulligan wanted to talk as soon as possible. My replies begin:
=====
To: trenton2@fbi.gov
Subject: Re: NILDA KEENE
From: Global Services freepress@myrealbox.com
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 18:44:58 -0500
On Fri, 18 Apr 2003 10:00:54 -0400, trenton2@fbi.gov wrote:
NOTE: New information and points here may be taken as a citizen
request for further attention/action which this email initiates.
Dear Agent Mulligan:
Thank you so much for contacting me. Oops our wires got crossed.
I am normally online 24/7 because I do little internet survey
research projects and my automated programs are collecting data
constantly.
Today, however, I could not notice your email because I went
offline to free up my phone, so I could wait for your call.
Thank you for your wonderful comments and listening ear. I will
take this opportunity to set down for the record a few points we
already discussed and perhaps some new twists. Also, I have
information coming in that might be productive, but
counterproductive if put on the web site. If there is a law
enforcement angle, I will notify you.
>JAMES J. KEENE
>
>Sir,
>
> My name is JOHN MULLIGAN, and I am an FBI Agent currently
>assigned to the Trenton, NJ office. It has been brought to our
>attention that you claim your former wife, NILDA DAVIS-FLORES
>KEENE, has kidnaped your children, and that an arrest warrant
>has been issued for her, charging her with kidnaping.
It seems this informant to you had not understood what she read
on the web site. There, it is clear that the arrest warrant was
issued by the Commonwealth of Dominica (I have a copy of it). I
also know of no arrest warrant in the U.S. Perhaps I should edit
that text on the web site to clarify that point so readers will
not be confused re the country.
> Our investigation has revealed that no such warrant is in
>effect, either in the United States or elsewhere. I have been
>instructed by our Legal
Re elsewhere, my understanding is that in Dominica arrest
warrants do not expire, however, I have not checked on its status
recently.
>Attache in Barbados to inform you, that if you wish to pursue
>obtaining legal custody of your children, as a U.S. Citizen, you
>must travel to the United States and litigate the matter civilly
>in a U.S. Court.
I too have been in contact with the Barbados people, as
documented in the chronologies to some extent, and already have
done precisely that. Per the FBI advice at that time, I had
obtained the Dominican court order and then learned from the FBI
they needed additionally the U.S. court order for a "pick up
order". For this purpose, since my lawyers said I had no chance
of justice in Guayama, PR, they thought the best shot was in the
San Juan U.S. Federal Court. That failed not on the merits of
the case, so to speak, but because of a technicality that
Dominica was not a signatory to a Hague Convention as described
in the chronology and by Judge LaFitte quoted there.
> I have attempted to contact you through the Ross University
>School of Medicine in Dominica, but was advised that you are no
>longer employed there, and that you have no home phone. If you
>have any questions or wish to contact me, you may do so by
>e-mail at trenton2@fbi.gov.
Well, my phone is 1-767-445-5837 listed under my real name in the
C&W phone book for Dominica. Aside from this children situation,
I have a simple peaceful life free of anything to hide or any
"skeletons in the closet". I suppose this "cleanness" is a real
fly in the ointment for the Davis-Flores crew. They can't get
"anything on me" because there isn't anything!
>Sincerely,
>SA JOHN MULLIGAN
Item:
Nilda can claim that she presently has full custody of the
children based on a Guayama court ruling in a divorce case she
filed, basically as a means to "legalize" or "legitimize" her
serial kidnappings. I also state on the web site that that
ruling is based on fraud and perjury and has no application or
real substantive relevance, and thus far no one has contested
that point of view. However, for the prosecution of inter-state
kidnapping, we will pretend that the ruling does have status
and limit ourselves to offenses before its issue.
Your query on my objectives:
1. I could appeal certain cases, but the years pass and what will
be the next technicality that will allow Nilda to "get away with
kidnapping". Not pursuing this one.
2. Law enforcement actions:
If Nilda were charged with some crime or offense, then this might
provide a chance for me to become a functioning father again and
at the same time set the stage, perhaps by a court order, that
Nilda receive treatment that she desperately needs (and two
children will be freed from captivity). She has rejected seeking
help. A law enforcement action might result in treatment being
mandatory. If so, great.
A) The centerpiece may be the PKPA. I differed with your
understanding (which is silly of me -- you are a law enforcement
expert) and suggested that you review the law. In fairness, I
should review it also and will do so.
Scenario:
A parent becomes aware that a spouse has taken children across
state lines without prior knowledge or consent and with the
intention of denying, and actual denial of, custodial rights.
The abducting spouse hides children from this parent and
continues to move state to state to achieve this purpose. Most
Americans would consider that immoral and a crime. It is my
understanding that this is what the PKPA is all about. If so, she
should be arrested immediately and prosecuted. I do not want any
harm to come to her or anyone else, but this may actually help
her.
If it is illegal to do what she has done (all that hiding and
travel before the 1998 Guayama court ruling), then it is
disservice to society to not prosecute. Sir, if the above
scenario is legal, we can have mayhem in the U.S. It means any
spouse can take, transport and detain children at any time and
that no parent has any "permanence" as a parent, since the other
parent can at any time unilaterally deny the rights and existence
of that parent (and by so doing abuse the victim children).
Again, isn't this what the PKPA is about? If so, if it means
anything, Nilda should be prosecuted.
Maybe this is a concept: If Nilda isn't prosecuted, who else
could be, ever again? In this case, you have iron-clad, crystal-
clear evidence. Alternatively, just forget that law and let
children be taken by any parent at anytime, to anywhere, lost for
ever by the other parent.
A new slant added as postscript to my "How to Kidnap..." article
makes this very point. If Nilda can do it, why can't anybody?
This is sort of a challenge offered in a friendly way. Maybe
readers of the site will say, yes, this is a great defense,
"Nilda can do it, therefore, so can I." *Prove me wrong* is my
friendly challenge. In the case of Nilda, lack of even an
attempt to prosecute opens the door to mayhem.
B) Perjury. As far as I know (in my extensive legal studies
conducted by watching Perry Mason, etc... :-)), perjury is
prosecutable by itself independent of any other offense. I have
the sworn statements, I have the proof of numerous acts of
perjury in those sworn statements (verifiable evidence not just
he said, she said). Get this from me, and file charges. This
perjury was used, additionally, to defraud the Guayama court (and
I suspect there was bribery there, too) re the custody result in
the divorce she initiated to get court approval, in effect, of
kidnapping.
C) Hot off the press is the NJ Board of Medical Examiners
situation. I just finished (before your message) sending out
queries on that situation. What are the laws there, relevant to
law enforcement? What are the procedures there, relevant to the
internal workings of the Board? Was the Board defrauded? Was
anything sent through the mail that was fraudulent information?
And isn't that also a crime? Did she lie about the arrest
warrant in Dominica? Does she really have a legal right to use
the name Nilda Keene? Are patients like my informant more
concerned about medical ethics than the Medical Examiners?
In the absence of any charges filed by law enforcement re any of
the above points -- serial inter-state kidnapping, perjury, etc
-- maybe the truth is that there was no fraud or irregularity
here re getting the medical license. Were there questions about
"background" that were not answered truthfully? She has received
psychiatric care herself in the past. Was there a question about
that? What was her answer? My guess is that one or more items
of fact were falsified in her application for a medical license
-- which would a "par" for the course. If so, charges could be
filed there possibly.
Lack of any prosecuting would argue for an "anarchy cascade
crime" scenario, where if some authority does not step in and say
"enough is enough" at some point, any point, the offender will
feel that there is no limit to the crime and fraud that they can
commit and the offenses just "roll off the production line".
The offenses can cascade and multiply like rats. Once Nilda and
Ana found that they could practice inter-state kidnapping with
impunity, I am sure they told the kids, in effect, "You have no
hope because we are above the law. No one can save you."
As in my "Captured Air Force Pilots..." article, the Davis-Flores
regime can rightly tell the prisoners, "Your government cannot
save you; you are ours now."
I think this might be the title of the next article. Walking
step by step so that prospective kidnappers, who apparently
should not even be called that if what they are doing is legal,
will "know how to do it." International child abduction is
protected by a technicality for certain countries. Perjury works
and will not be prosecuted. Inter-state kidnapping is covered by
no law (1995-1998) and is permissible. You may kidnap whether or
not you are a parent of the victim child (re the other
Davis-Flores kidnappers). In brief, kidnapping in general is OK.
As far as Ana Davis-Flores and Pedro Davis-Flores, etc, are
concerned, I am sure that perverts and pedophiles would love to
know this -- you may hold and hide captive children in your house
and it is OK. No police will ask you anything; there is no
authority to say "no" to you. If one is a physician, child abuse
and malpractice is OK because the Medical Board (in Puerto Rico)
won't even let anyone present evidence.
[Defrauding the NJ Medical Examiners is OK because they just don't
care about the fitness of physicians -- this last point is
pending -- I just sent out inquiries on this one to learn about
how that works].
At some point, some one has to say, "No." As a private citizen,
I have no authority to say, "No." It must be law enforcement or
some other official entity.
Dear Agent Mulligan, I expressed the points above dramatically to
show maybe, where the issues really are or may be. With all due
respect, I would be most interested in what your findings might
be and what developments you see as feasible.
So coming up next on Missing Keene Kids will be some description
of "Crime Cascade Anarchy" -- the contribution of Nilda Keene to
America.
:-)
Yours faithfully, Jim
=====
To: trenton2@fbi.gov
Subject: Re: NILDA KEENE
From: Global Services freepress@myrealbox.com
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 22:46:20 -0500
On Fri, 18 Apr 2003 10:00:54 -0400, trenton2@fbi.gov wrote:
>JAMES J. KEENE
>
>Sir,
>
> My name is JOHN MULLIGAN, and I am an FBI Agent currently
>assigned to the Trenton, NJ office. It has been brought to our
>attention that you claim your former wife, NILDA DAVIS-FLORES
>KEENE, has kidnaped your children, and that an arrest warrant
>has been issued for her, charging her with kidnaping.
Dear Agent Mulligan: The arrest warrant in Dominica was issued
not for kidnapping, but for failing to obey the order to appear
in the High Court of Dominica with the children and present the
reasons why they were taken and detained.
https://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/missing/chron-95.html
...
Have a nice Easter weekend, sir. Yours, Jim (James Keene).
=====
To: trenton2@fbi.gov
Subject: Re: NILDA KEENE
From: Global Services freepress@myrealbox.com
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 00:24:41 -0500
On Fri, 18 Apr 2003 10:00:54 -0400, trenton2@fbi.gov wrote:
Dear Special Agent Milligan:
> My name is JOHN MULLIGAN, and I am an FBI Agent currently
>assigned to the Trenton, NJ office. It has been brought to our
>attention that you claim your former wife, NILDA DAVIS-FLORES
>KEENE, has kidnaped your children, and that an arrest warrant
>has been issued for her, charging her with kidnaping.
I understand from my lawyer at that time (1995) in Dominica that
the High Court Order for Nilda to appear with the children, was
sort of a first step in "charging her with kidnapping". That
is, for the Judge to issue that order in the first place, the
Judge was convinced by evidence presented that a kidnapping
appears to have occurred. And depending on what the Judge heard
concerning her "reasons" for taking the children, there might
then be further charges, or return of my children, for example.
But she did not appear.
My search for help in this situation, now centered on the web
site, asks precisely the question: why has she not been charged
with crimes committed in the U.S.? I think readers will want an
answer to that question, since the average person thinks they
will land up in federal prison if they do those things that Dr.
Nilda is allowed to do.
If the Executive Branch of the U.S. government, with all of its
law enforcement agencies, cannot stand up and say "no" to the
Davis-Flores gang, who am I to fiddle around with some civil suit
re the suggestion of your Barbados contact? There must something
I am terribly in the dark about here.
Just more thoughts. Thanks for your investigative work.
Take care, jim
=====
To: trenton2@fbi.gov
Subject: Re: NILDA KEENE
From: Global Services freepress@myrealbox.com
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 01:13:00 -0500
On Fri, 18 Apr 2003 10:00:54 -0400, trenton2@fbi.gov wrote:
>JAMES J. KEENE
>
>Sir,
>
> My name is JOHN MULLIGAN, and I am an FBI Agent currently
>assigned to the Trenton, NJ office. It has been brought to our
>attention that you claim
[snip]
Dear Special Agent Mulligan:
My take, generally, is that the only reason Nilda and
co-abductors have not be questioned or arrested is that somehow
this case has "fallen through the cracks" or in spite of all of
my efforts, I failed in the past to make the effort in the right
way or right place.
FYI and of possible law enforcement relevance to investigation
which I hope and pray can be conducted:
1. If Judge LaFitte's "technicality ruling" can be considered as
a working fact of life, then the TIME FRAME for prosecutable
crimes begins at the moment the Liat (I think it must have been)
flight from Canefield, Dominica to San Juan, PR, Feb. 1, 1995,
touched the ground in San Juan. The Dominica events could be
considered as background, however.
2. I have previously stated in our conversation that for
inter-state child kidnapping, the TIME FRAME would *end* at the
point that the Guayama, PR, court awarded full custody to Nilda.
Again, the legality of that ruling can be on the back burner.
Please note that some time BEFORE that divorce related ruling,
that court had awarded temporary custody to Nilda (and I could
find and pull that date.)
3. Thus we have a defined TIME FRAME re inter-state child
kidnapping (parental for Nilda and ordinary plain vanilla for her
siblings).
4. My chron-95.html describes two such instances. Pulling travel
records in that TIME FRAME would enable listing of all "counts"
of kidnapping.
5. I assume that this TIME FRAME would not rigidly apply for
perjury, child abuse (including false imprisonment),
falsification of evidence and possible bribery (please see
below), etc, either for Nilda or her siblings.
6. In spite of our fine conversation, there is not yet a report
from a reliable person (such as yourself) that my children are
even alive. I assume they are, but assumptions are not good
enough for a parent.
7. ...
8. As a "state of mind" reference, on several occasions early on
Nilda told me she would "go to prison" if necessary, but would
not be deterred.
9. The more I think about it, the possibility of bribery of
Willingboro Police seems more and more likely in this
extraordinary case, perhaps one of the most sensational cases of
child kidnapping in the U.S. in recent times. (You see, SA
Mulligan, a "powerless" victim parent will pursue any angle or
"hook" to get attention from authorities.)
Here is a pre print first draft of analysis of that topic which
may later appear on my Web Site.
=====DRAFT OF NEW ARTICLE====
... A draft of the "Police to Parent" article was inserted here.
=====end of first draft
Well, dear SA Mulligan, maybe there is a bribery crime here too.
It would be interesting to find out, if only for educational
purposes, how the Davis-Flores gang managed to evade justice in
this particular chapter of the story.
Yours, Jim
James Keene
=====
To: "SA Mulligan, FBI"
Subject: NILDA KEENE informant
From: Global Services freepress@myrealbox.com
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 22:11:39 -0500
Dear SA Mulligan, FBI
(1) ...
(2) ...
Yours, Jim
James Keene
=====
To: "SA Mulligan, FBI"
Subject: NILDA KEENE & Willingboro PD
From: Global Services freepress@myrealbox.com
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 09:42:21 -0500
Dear SA Mulligan, FBI
(1) Normally [if there is such a thing in this case ..:-)], the
new article, "Local Police to Parent: Will not look for missing
children", the first draft of which was included in a previous
email, would be polished a bit and sent to the Willingboro, NJ,
PD, for comment, corrections, additional information, etc,
*before* publication.
If this "routine" procedure might interfere with any activity of
the Bureau regarding this case, please advise.
(2) As promised, I am looking at the laws. Alas, I am not
trained in law and can only do so much there. I have "Family
Abduction" Fourth Edition, January 1994, National Center for
Missing and Exploited Children, which, I understand, is a part
of, or supported by, the U.S. Department of Justice.
Re police behavior, it will be interesting to see if my Missing
Children Reports were indeed entered into the NCIC computer and
if not, why not. A whole host of laws are described in "Family
Abduction" including a section at the end "The Laws on Family
Abduction" including both State Laws and Federal Laws.
Thank you for your attention, yours, jim
James J. Keene
=====
To: "SA Mulligan, FBI"
Subject: NILDA KEENE & Civil Lawsuit
From: Global Services freepress@myrealbox.com
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 14:06:01 -0500
Dear SA Mulligan, FBI
I think the suggestion from your contact in Barbados re a civil
suit by me in New Jersey, shows clearly why more than one glance
is needed in the Nilda Keene case.
She already has a record of (1) not obeying an order from a
court, (2) not showing up in court when served and (3) fleeing
and hiding both to try to avoid being served or the court order.
Clearly, a civil suit by me is not an option. Likewise, failure
of law enforcement to prosecute is, I think, not an option.
...
Take care, jim
James J. Keene
P.S. Should it be relevant, for work on the Nilda Keene case,
I hereby give permission, when it might be required, for the FBI
or associated law enforcement to retrieve any record whatsoever
about myself, should it be deemed relevant by them to proceed
with the case.
=====
To: "SA Mulligan, FBI"
Subject: NILDA KEENE "Police to Parent"
From: Global Services freepress@myrealbox.com
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 01:40:38 -0500
Dear SA Mulligan, FBI
Hi, the article "Police to Parent: Will Not Look For Missing
Children" (attached wtpolice.zip) has been extended and polished
a bit.
According to routine, next step would be to send to the
Willingboro PD for comments, clarifications, etc, before
publication. I shall await, however, for a time, your thoughts
on what may be a sensitive step at this juncture.
Best wishes, Jim
P.S. Sometimes the experimental myrealbox.com looses emails;
alternative very reliable, email addresses are keenej@cwdom.dm
and doctorelectron@cwdom.dm
=====
To: "SA Mulligan, FBI"
Subject: NILDA KEENE "Police to Parent"
From: Global Services freepress@myrealbox.com
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 12:22:41 -0500
Dear SA Mulligan, FBI
Hello!
1. The article "Police to Parent: Will Not Look For Missing
Children" has been polished further with several points added or
clarified and is available, but not publicly (there is no link
to it or public knowledge that it is there), at
https://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/missing/wtpolice.html
It is clear from your email to me that some investigation was
done (thank you very much), but it is uncertain if anything
further is underway. Since law enforcement may wish to proceed
without my knowledge of any particulars, let's say this: I will
forward the above article to the Willingboro Township police at
the beginning of May, unless advised otherwise by your most
excellent offices.
2. I have contacted at least two families with children known
(almost 100%) in the Willingboro area to be in contact with my
children, with varying degrees of success. Please let me know
if these particulars are of interest.
3. Re #2, it seems that Nilda's most excellent cover stories have
turned me into some sort of pariah and this may explain why it
has been difficult to get ordinary, straight answers from
otherwise reputable people.
Take care, Jim
========
Subject: NILDA KEENE email address and WTPD
To: trenton2@fbi.gov
From: keenej@cwdom.dm
Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 12:30:39 -0500
--------
FBI
Dear SA Mulligan:
1. On May 1, 2003, ...
2. On the evening before May 1,
(a) Some dozen law enforcement sites all list the same URL or
Willingboro PD web site; but it was down/unreachable.
(b) As indicated previously, I send the article on the
Willingboro Township PD (still non-public URL):
https://www.angelfire.com/space/netcensus/missing/wtpolice.html
with a cover letter to
=====BEGIN copy of email=====
To: drose@mail.twp.willingboro.nj.us
Text quoted in "Police to Parent" article.
=====END copy of email=====
(c) Since there was some uncertainty if the above email reached
it's destination, on May 4, copies of the above message with a
request to forward to the WTPD, were sent to:
BCPA@co.burlington.nj.us and webmaster@co.burlington.nj.us
(d) I could find no working email address for the Burlington
County prosecutor or his office.
3. Re your investigation through Barbados on the arrest warrant,
at my first opportunity (when I am off-line in the day and can
use my own phone for voice calls), I will call the Attorney
General and/or Chief of Police in Dominica to determine the
status:
(a) Do arrests warrants "expire" in Dominica?
(b) Was this particular arrest warrant actively "removed from the
books"? If so, by whom, when, why? Why was I not notified? etc.
This outcome would require a whole new investigation of what
might be called a component in a continuing cover-up story.
(c) Given almost 8 years and maybe many file cabinet and/or
computer system changes in that time, is it simply difficulty in
locating it? If so, I can go to Roseau and provide them with all
the paperwork and copies to "restore" their records.
(d) I don't know the importance of this issue in any work on this
case that you may be doing. However, it is a certainty, I think,
that Nilda has no plan to return to Dominica ever. In that
sense, it may be a mute point. On the other hand, it does show
the character and history of the person.
Sincerely and God bless, jim
James J. Keene PhD
P.S. The lighter side (if there is any). The radio just played
the pop hit classic "I fought the law and the law won." I was
thinking that Nilda does not even have to say to the children,
"I fought the law and I won". So far, I have no concrete
evidence that "the law" has ever put up a "fight" with
"Ma Nilda". Hopefully, through work of your most excellent
office, this situation will change. :-)
========
Subject: How about this?
To: trenton2@fbi.gov
From: keenej@cwdom.dm
Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 13:01:47 -0500
--------
FBI
Dear SA Mulligan:
Hope all your cases are going well. Please take a look:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,87710,00.html
I am not a betting men, but I would guess the lady convicted of
conspiring to kidnap a child was not named "Davis-Flores".
Yours, James J. Keene
========
Subject: Bacanonic yes, Davis-Flores?
To: trenton2@fbi.gov
From: keenej@cwdom.dm
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 17:14:03 -0500
--------
FBI
Dear SA Mulligan:
Hello! Reading about the Martha Stewart case at cnn.com,
"Bacanovic was charged with perjury and making and using false
documents." Is "Davis-Flores was charged..." in the offing?
BTW, she has also done the "making and using false documents".
I have the evidence.
Yours, James J. Keene
========
Subject: ATTN: SA Mulligan RE Nilda Davis-Flores
To: trenton2@fbi.gov
From: keenej@cwdom.dm
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 12:22:46 -0500
--------
FBI
Dear SA Mulligan:
The documentation quoted below shows:
1. how Nilda (Keene?) Davis-Flores has provided incomplete,
misleading and/or false information to an official institution:
The National Spiritual Assembly of the Baha'is of the United
States.
2. raises the question, in light of this current pattern of
behavior documented below, if Nilda has done essentially the same
thing in defrauding the New Jersey Board of Medical Examiners and
possibly your own organization, the FBI.
Re your side of the equation, questions remain re the status of
investigation, arrest and prosecution
1. for perjury and obstruction of justice associated with the
Guayama Court proceedings
2. for serial inter-state child kidnapping in (at least) the
June-July, 1995, period for Nilda and especially Ana Davis-Flores
(who travels with Nilda) and Pedro Davis-Flores.
The exchange with the Baha'is documented below also asserts the
authoritative nature of the information on my web site. I
believe the public will want to know why these crimes are not
prosecuted if this is the position of the FBI -- an official FBI
statement on this subject would do just fine.
In this regard, it may be noteworthy that you have not requested
copies of the evidence for perjury and obstruction of justice
from myself.
In your phone call to me, you cited "many bad things" on my
Missing Keene Kids web site. Well, what is the progress in
cleaning up those "bad things", to the extent that you can report
that to me?
Yours, James J. Keene
=====BEGIN DOCUMENTATION=====
Documentation re email echange with the National Baha'i Center of the U.S. was inserted here. This is dicussed above and in other Keene Kids News articles. In brief, the Baha'is were very effective and helpful in this case.
=====END DOCUMENTATION=====
========
Subject: Arrest Warrants Don't Expire in Dominica
To: trenton2@fbi.gov
From: keenej@cwdom.dm
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 15:18:50 -0500
--------
FBI
SA Mulligan
Dear sir:
Per my promise to you, I just spoke with a high ranking officer
at Police Headquarters, Bath Road, Roseau, Dominica
(1-767-448-2957 or -3452). The officer stated categorically that
arrest warrants do not expire in Dominica. There you have it;
hard data.
I have a copy of that arrest warrant, which was signed, dated,
sealed and in fact is an official document of the High Court of
the land.
I could not reach this afternoon the Registrar of the High Court
(1-767-448-1814) to confirm if they could actually locate their
copy of it. To wit: (CIVIL) suit no 240 of 1995; Nilda Margarita
Keene nee Davis-Flores; re requirement 26-July-1995; warrant
issued 25-Sep-95; signed, dated, stamped, embossed by REGISTRAR.
This latter confirmation is required (1) for me to give them a
copy if it is merely misplaced or (2) to determine if some third
party action unknown to me has somehow taken that off the books
(scandal?), as described previously.
Now, what about the perjury, obstruction of justice, interstate
kidnapping? Let us not forget about the "many bad things" [SA
Mulligan in phone call to JJ Keene]. Thanks! :-)
James J. Keene PhD
========
Subject: ATTN: SA Mulligan Re Davis-Flores
To: trenton2@fbi.gov
From: keenej@cwdom.dm
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 13:32:20 -0500
--------
SA Mulligan
FBI
Dear sir:
FYI, recently I was contacted to join a petition to promote
modification of law re inter-state extradition in child
kidnapping cases. I informed the people that according to the
FBI (your phone call to me), inter-state child kidnapping either
by a parental abductor or by others, is NOT a crime and therefore
there is no issue re extradition.
As yet, I have not received from the FBI an official statement
on this, but suffice it to say, there are people out there who
believe the above offenses are crimes! The petition people cited
above replied with interest on the particulars.
It seems that the time is appropriate for an official FBI
statement concerning the lack of prosecution on child kidnapping
in the U.S. This would be front-page news. At any rate, in the
absence of such an official statement, should people who think
this is a crime be referred to you or should I quote you
explicitly, by name?
I haven't used your name yet, but you might agree that your
apparently unorthodox position is very news-worthy. Who knows,
these people might show up with several live news trucks; but
that is probably just wishful thinking on my part. At minimum,
it does seem appropriate to officially clarify the matter. Now
I see we have people apparently held on charges and subject to
extradition and yet according to you, no offense has been
committed.
I submit these thoughts and this request with all humility and
respect for you and the FBI, simply hoping to clarify the points
raised.
Sincerely,
James J. Keene PhD
========
Subject: ATTN: SA Mulligan Re Davis-Flores
To: trenton2@fbi.gov
From: keenej@cwdom.dm
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 10:17:22 -0500
--------
SA Mulligan
FBI
Dear sir:
I was hoping you or an "assigned agent" might request further
evidence from me, as numerous items, some not mentioned on the
Missing Keene Kids web site, are available. [Recent new articles
there might be of interest.]
One such item is a witness who was in the house of Pedro
Davis-Flores in July, 1995 and can testify to the fact that my
children were there, that they were made to hide in a back room
if someone came to the door and what most third party experts
would call child abuse.
I wonder if there is a statue of limitations applicable to child
kidnapping.
Sincerely,
James J. Keene PhD
keenej@cwdom.dm
Copyright © 2005 James J. Keene
Original Publication: Jan 6, 2005
Please use Back on your browser to return to Missing Keene Kids.