Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

<< home  < Articles

"Blood Type" Diet

Threads - Eat right For Your Type

see also
http://www.vegsource.com/articles/blood_hype.htm
and http://www.quackwatch.org/04ConsumerEducation/NegativeBR/d'adamo.html


On 17/8/2003, Chris Forbes-Ewan posted:


I am 'flat out like a lizard drinking' and have to log off Science Matters for a couple of weeks. But before I do, I suggest that anyone interested in popular diets would be well-advised to read the FAQs written by the Nutritionists Network ('Nut-Net') on this topic.

The index for the FAQs is available through the Nutrition Australia website:

http://www.nutritionaustralia.org/Food_Facts/FAQ/faq_index.asp

The 'Eat Right for Your Type' diet is addressed under the heading 'Other Diets'; direct URL:

http://www.nutritionaustralia.org/Food_Facts/FAQ/popular_diets_p3_other_diets.asp

For those who want to 'cut to the chase', the final sentence of the FAQ reads:

"In summary, the Eat Right For Your Type diet has no basis in science, and no aspect of this diet can be recommended."

Paul Williams responded:

Found "The Liver Cleansing Diet" here as well and have forwarded on the the above URL to a friend who has a current passion for this diet book.

Summing up:
"Despite containing some good points, there is too much inappropriate advice in the Liver Cleansing Diet--and too little regard for the value of physical activity--to recommend its adoption for either the short or long term."

Peter Macinnis quipped:


>"In summary, the Eat Right For Your Type diet has no basis in science, and
>no aspect of this diet can be recommended."

No, but my patented eye colour diet works a treat.  People with green eyes can choose from peas, beans and other veges or well-hung meat, people with brown eyes eat chocolate, people with bloodshot eyes may eat ripe tomatoes and raw meat, and so on . . .

Jim Thornton added:

And people with blue eyes must eat blueberries and fresh air with the Sun in the right direction for it to work ;-)

Gary-Peter Dalrymple commented:

Eat right for your blood group?

Put me down as a Skeptic on this!
(and I'll be in Canberra for the National convention this weekend)

It sounds a bit too much like a peculiar Japanese practice, where having the 'wrong' blood group infers that you have personality faults that would make you an undesirable marriage partner.

I presume that this has it's origin's in Japan's home grown racialism, the need to prevent intermarriage with citizens tainted by the suspicion of Ainu Burakumon, Korean or Taiwanese descent.

Rob Geraghty responded:

I hadn't heard of the blood type issue in Japan that way.  I only heard of it as a "personality type"  connection; ie. if you have blood group "O" you have a certain personality.  I don't know that it necessarily has a negative connotation.  I also dno't think that young Japanese people take it very seriously.

> I presume that this has its origin's in Japan's
> home grown racialism, the need to prevent
> intermarriage with citizens tainted by the
> suspicion of Ainu Burakumon, Korean or
> Taiwanese descent.

Maybe.  But in lots of families, marriage between a Japanese person and a non-Japanese person of any descent is frowned on.  Not simply the ones mentioned above.  On the other hand, such marriages do happen anyway.

Considering that the Japanese are descended from mainland Chinese, and that the Ainu are the aborigines, clinging to racial "purity" seems bizarre.

The "in" diets when I was in Japan last year were based on what was described as a "diabetic diet"; related to eating foods with a low glycaemic index.


Tamara Kelly wrote:

Personalities according to blood type - mmm... take your pick - they say opposing things.

http://allsands.com/Health/bloodpersonali_bhy_gn.htm

http://website.lineone.net/~bloodprofiling/perscomp.htm

David Maddern responded:

How they can assign wide variation in behaviour to ABO blood is beyond me For instance nearly half of the Australian population are group 0 and nearly half are A is there a clear delineation in these characteristics?

And taking Australian Aborigines without Caucasian parentage  there is no group B at all so all are phenotypically A or 0

So are all of them one personality either one personality type or the other?

Give us a break, that is beyond credibility by light years