Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

<< home  < Articles

Defence Against Lightning

Threads -  Defence Against Lightning


On 4/8/2005, Peter Macinnis wrote:

On another list, I mentioned an occasion on Sydney's North Head, where a lightning strike nearby caused our hair to move enough so we could feel it. When we saw our hair rise again, we headed off fast for the cover of a car.

Another list member said that what we should have done was to discard metal objects, as these "attract lightning". My gut reaction is that it would be foolish to hold a metal rod up high, but that change in the pockets, for example, would have no effect.

The comment came from an American, and I think they are all taught about Ben Franklin sending up a kite with a key on the string.  What ARE the scientific principles that spell out the best defences against lightning?

Tony Hyland replied:
On a recent Mythbusters segment shown on 'Beyond Tomorrow' on Ch. 7, they showed a guy who'd survived being hit by lightning. The 'myth' was that his tongue stud had attracted the lightning.

The presenters set up two plastic 'heads' in a lab, and zapped them with simulated lightning. One head had a tongue stud, but did not get hit more often than the other. More and more studs were added, also with no effect.

It wasn't till they inserted a large steel bolt that the head attracted more strikes.

Moral: Don't use a bolt for a tongue stud, especially if you're going to be out in a lightning storm.

Which doesn't help much with Peter's question, but probably shows where I get most of my scientific information

Merrill Pye responded:

I catch that show sometimes on SBS when I'm home early but too depressed to watch 7:30 Report on ABC. It's a great blend of science, technology and 'boy-style'* fun. A good alternative to the Jackass type show.

Bolt thru head, lightning - I am irresistably reminded of the movie versions of Frankenstein's monster; Is there an Igor in the house?



*Explosions, embarrassing bodily functions, bad smells, quite a bit of cars and machinery involved in crashes & smashes.

John Winckle joked:

Be assured, lightening never strikes the same place twice, because after the first strike it isn't the place anymore.


Hilly van Zuylekom wrote:

>  What ARE the scientific principles that spell out the best defences
> against lightning?

I don't know all the scientific principles, I only remember a few from my high school years:

Lightning is attracted by metal, water, high objects: A person (ca 65% water), standing under a tree (ca 30% water): not a good idea.

I was always intrigued by the Cage of Faraday where the electric charge stays on the outside of the cage (car) so that there is no electrostaticity within the cage (don't touch the metal after the car is hit).

My old science teacher would be impressed that I remembered, he always thought that science and girls didn't go together...ah well, that was a long time ago!

I saved the tips underneath from the Internet some time ago and most of it confirms what I was taught as a child. My grandfather owned a peatfarm and spend most of his working life in the fields so I guess that his experiences with thunder and lightning were not based on
science but on experience and knowledge. Among other things I was told that if I was ever caught in a thunderstorm, outside on my pushbike, with no houses or barns in sight, I had to get off my bike, put it down, move away and lie down in a ditch until the storm passed!
Funny the things one remembers!

                     -------
Personal Lightning Safety Tips

1. PLAN in advance your evacuation and safety measures. When you first see lightning or hear thunder, activate your emergency plan. Now is the time to go to a building or a vehicle. Lightning often precedes rain, so don't wait for the rain to begin before suspending activities.

2. IF OUTDOORS...Avoid water. Avoid the high ground. Avoid open spaces. Avoid all metal objects including electric wires, fences, machinery, motors, power tools, etc. Unsafe places include underneath canopies, small picnic or rain shelters, or near trees. Where possible, find shelter in a substantial building or in a fully enclosed metal vehicle such as a car, truck or a van with the windows completely shut. If lightning is striking nearby when you are outside, you should:

    A. Crouch down. Put feet together. Place hands over ears to minimize hearing damage from thunder.

    B. Avoid proximity (minimum of 15 ft.) to other people.

3. IF INDOORS... Avoid water. Stay away from doors and windows. Do not use the telephone. Take off head sets. Turn off, unplug, and stay away from appliances, computers, power tools, & TV sets. Lightning may strike exterior electric and phone lines, inducing shocks to inside
equipment.

4. SUSPEND ACTIVITIES for 30 minutes after the last observed lightning or thunder.

5. INJURED PERSONS do not carry an electrical charge and can be handled safely. Apply First Aid procedures to a lightning victim if you are qualified to do so. Call 911 or send for help immediately.

6. KNOW YOUR EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBERS.

Teach this safety slogan:
"If you can see it, flee it; if you can hear it, clear it."


David Maddern added:

The Scientific principles

Make thyself as flat as possible

the warning.. the smell of ionized oxygen- ozone aka the beach

If the warning is effected pre the principle then something else might take the charge and try not to remember that we are made of water and some soluble salts plus some insoluble bits. Don't think coins in the pocket are going to make
a lot of difference.

Another principle is that if you are within the square of the height of the nearest thing then you SHOULD be protected.
Experience by many would indicate that principles arent everything.


Gerald Cairns replied:

I am not so sure about the reliability of your last principle. When our kids were young we took them camping and fossiking near Scone NSW and camped on the banks of a creek near some pine trees. The weather looked fine but a storm built up at dusk just as I was sitting on the floor of the tent with the gas bottle and lamp between my knees lighting it. Our son was looking out of the window at the storm when there was an almighty deafening crash. Son fell back screaming with pain in his ears and I looked at the crown jewels to see if they were still there. Then we smelt burning and I grabbed the fire extinguisher and ran outside to find the grass on fire at the base of a pine tree maybe 30 cm from the trunk and about a couple of metres from the tent. Fire was put out and on investigation the strike point was identified as a small very blackened hole in the ground about the size of a 20 cent piece in the centre of the fire. The tree was not touched yet the bolt must have passed down through numerous branches to reach the spot where it stuck.

I reckoned we had learned enough of lightning that night so we quickly vacated the tent and placed all spare fuel etc. a safe distance away and spent a wild and uncomfortable night in the car. Fortunately no more near misses occurred but all I can say from this limited experience and one other is that the process appears to be highly unpredictable except for certain well known dangerous activities like balloons on wires etc.

The other "near miss" was quite recently when I opened the back door to go upstairs having shut down all electronics until the storm had passed as is our routine and I was blasted backwards under the house by a bolt that struck without warning very very close but on later investigation when the rain had stopped the strike point was not found. I suspect Peter took the safest option. There is an emeritus professor of electrical engineering at UQ, Prof. Matt Darveniza Lightning & Transient Protection Pty Ltd, who has developed a folding aluminium tripod under which you can crouch and according to him be relatively safe. He has demonstrated himself using discharges up to hundreds of thousands of volts but I am not volunteering.

His hypothesis seems sound and to work but his safety device has been ignored commercially. His advice is to crouch down with feet as close to gether as possible. I am not sure if he is still active but I do have a phone number if anyone wants it.

David Maddern commented:

Yep, can only concur hence the shouting SHOULD

There's a man in Hobart who makes lightening conductors for buildings, and that is big business. I gather he uses rare earths.

Gary Dalrymple responded:

In a slightly different context, beyond the 'cone of silence' effect of mobilephone repeaters/towers and the six watts at 1 cm Vs howmany watts at hownany metres: as people complain about them being 'too close' to schools and playing fields, surely it must occur to some protesters that these structures make excellent supplimentry lightning rods to keep the kiddies safer?

Currently bathing in the refracted glory of 1,000 watts per square of Nuclear Fusion powered EMF
Gerald Cairns replied to Hilly:

Hi Hilly,
I am not going to argue with the concept that tall objects are more likely to be struck but as in our camping experience the bolt passed down through the branches of a tall tree without apparently hitting them but stuck the ground within about 30 cm of the trunk? There is more to this than simply tall objects methinks. The chaotic ionization of the air/rain as the bolt progresses is probably an important factor.

David Martin related:

An interesting (and scary) anecdote.

I had a similar experience in the UK many years ago. Whilst picking strawberries in an open field on a thundery day, my hair stood on end quite spectacularly. There was no lightning though, despite the immense amount of charge passing over the ground - a worry at the time nevertheless!

Some physics now.

There is no theoretical reason why metal would "attract" lightning. So far as I'm aware, there is no experimental evidence either: this is just another "old wives' tale".

The physics of lightning is not completely understood, however. The main reason is that the electric fields, generated by electric charge in thunderclouds, are generally too small (by a factor of about ten) to initiate lightning strikes.

Some recent work supports the idea that the trigger for a strike is a charged particle cascade initiated by a cosmic ray. There was an article in Scientific American recently (as I recall), but see, e.g.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning#Runaway_breakdown_theory

This would mean that lightning strikes, although broadly confined to the region of high electric field under a thundercloud, would be otherwise
essentially random.

As regards protection, it follows directly from Coulomb's law that the *static* charge on a conducting object sits on the outside; hence the idea of a Faraday cage, inside which there is no charge and no electric field. A lightning strike is far from a static event, however. Nevertheless, if the material is highly conducting, charge flows to the surface in a much shorter time (picoseconds) than the duration of the strike (microseconds) so the strike is relatively static. You're probably safest inside a car - the metal chassis would be a reasonably effective Faraday cage. The relative safety of a car, of course, has nothing whatever to do with the "insulating" rubber tyres: a few centimetres of rubber is no insulation at all at a billion volts.

Kevin Phyland answered:

I've been following this thread from afar...most of the advice has been sound enough that there was no need for me to comment.

Having said that, there are a number of interesting facets of lightning not yet discussed.

Firstly, lightning is notoriously bad at actually killing you (about 10% of people hit by lightning are killed). This is probably due to the fact that lightning goes around the surface of a human body normally (surface flash burns).

The metal thing has at least one basis in fact though. Metal conducts electricity very well. When the charge builds up on the ground near a thunderstorm it tends to accumulate at points (so things like metal rods and Hills hoists are really good charge accumulators). The basics (as currently understood, and David correctly points out that this is far from *fact*) is that when the charge difference between cloud base and ground is large enough, basically a spark starts to move...

(As an aside, trees are also nasty. Not so much for their conductive properties (they have a fairly high resistance) but when they get struck they heat up...explosively!!! Shrapnel from bark and wood is very dangerous...)

Here's where it gets interesting...the first current surges are essentially random movements where ionisation has created small paths for charge to flow. But then normal air resistance causes the pooled charge (sorry if I play fast and loose with terminology here) halts and doesn't move on until a new lower resistance channel can be established. This doesn't take all day btw...a matter of nanoseconds...and then the current flows off again.

Now...when the charge channel gets close enough to the ground (maybe 50 or 100 metres) the opposite charges on points on the Earth's surface and the cloud charges start attracting each other like crazy...this actual means that the initial bolt starts from the Earth-based object...i.e. if you are struck by lightning you are struck from below not above.

If you have hair rising the charge difference (i.e. potential difference) is significant and scary.

Yep...squat down and place your feet as close together as possible...and don't go out and get the washing off the metal clothes line...this has caused a number of fatalities...if you make sure that the ONLY path for the current is THROUGH your body rather than AROUND your  body...you are dead.

My thoughts anyway,