On 4/8/2005, Peter Macinnis wrote:
On another list, I mentioned an occasion on Sydney's North Head, where a
lightning strike nearby caused our hair to move enough so we could feel
it. When we saw our hair rise again, we headed off fast for the cover of
a car.
Another list member said that what we should have done was to discard
metal objects, as these "attract lightning". My gut reaction is that it
would be foolish to hold a metal rod up high, but that change in the
pockets, for example, would have no effect.
The comment came from an American, and I think they are all taught about
Ben Franklin sending up a kite with a key on the string. What ARE the
scientific principles that spell out the best defences against lightning?
Tony Hyland replied:
On a recent Mythbusters segment shown on 'Beyond Tomorrow' on Ch. 7, they showed a guy who'd survived being hit by lightning. The 'myth' was that his tongue stud had attracted the lightning.
The presenters set up two plastic 'heads' in a lab, and zapped them with simulated lightning. One head had a tongue stud, but did not get hit more often than the other. More and more studs were added, also with no effect.
It wasn't till they inserted a large steel bolt that the head attracted more strikes.
Moral: Don't use a bolt for a tongue stud, especially if you're going to be out in a lightning storm.
Which doesn't help much with Peter's question, but probably shows where I get most of my scientific information
Merrill Pye responded:
I catch that
show sometimes on SBS when I'm home early but too depressed to watch
7:30 Report on ABC. It's a great blend of science, technology and
'boy-style'* fun. A good alternative to the Jackass type show.
Bolt thru head,
lightning - I am irresistably reminded of the movie versions of
Frankenstein's monster; Is there an Igor in the house?
*Explosions, embarrassing bodily functions, bad smells, quite a bit of cars and machinery involved in crashes & smashes.
John Winckle joked:
Be assured, lightening never strikes the same place twice, because after the first strike it isn't the place anymore.
Hilly van Zuylekom wrote:
> What ARE the scientific principles that spell out the best defences
> against lightning?
I don't know all the scientific principles, I only remember a few from
my high school years:
Lightning is attracted by metal, water, high objects: A person (ca 65%
water), standing under a tree (ca 30% water): not a good idea.
I was always intrigued by the Cage of Faraday where the electric
charge stays on the outside of the cage (car) so that there is no
electrostaticity within the cage (don't touch the metal after the car
is hit).
My old science teacher would be impressed that I remembered, he always
thought that science and girls didn't go together...ah well, that was
a long time ago!
I saved the tips underneath from the Internet some time ago and most
of it confirms what I was taught as a child. My grandfather owned a
peatfarm and spend most of his working life in the fields so I guess
that his experiences with thunder and lightning were not based on
science but on experience and knowledge.
Among other things I was told that if I was ever caught in a
thunderstorm, outside on my pushbike, with no houses or barns in
sight, I had to get off my bike, put it down, move away and lie down
in a ditch until the storm passed!
Funny the things one remembers!
-------
Personal Lightning Safety Tips
1. PLAN in advance your evacuation and safety measures. When you first
see lightning or hear thunder, activate your emergency plan. Now is
the time to go to a building or a vehicle. Lightning often precedes
rain, so don't wait for the rain to begin before suspending activities.
2. IF OUTDOORS...Avoid water. Avoid the high ground. Avoid open
spaces. Avoid all metal objects including electric wires, fences,
machinery, motors, power tools, etc. Unsafe places include underneath
canopies, small picnic or rain shelters, or near trees. Where
possible, find shelter in a substantial building or in a fully
enclosed metal vehicle such as a car, truck or a van with the windows
completely shut. If lightning is striking nearby when you are outside,
you should:
A. Crouch down. Put feet together. Place hands over ears to
minimize hearing damage from thunder.
B. Avoid proximity (minimum of 15 ft.) to other people.
3. IF INDOORS... Avoid water. Stay away from doors and windows. Do not
use the telephone. Take off head sets. Turn off, unplug, and stay away
from appliances, computers, power tools, & TV sets. Lightning may
strike exterior electric and phone lines, inducing shocks to inside
equipment.
4. SUSPEND ACTIVITIES for 30 minutes after the last observed lightning
or thunder.
5. INJURED PERSONS do not carry an electrical charge and can be
handled safely. Apply First Aid procedures to a lightning victim if
you are qualified to do so. Call 911 or send for help immediately.
6. KNOW YOUR EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBERS.
Teach this safety slogan:
"If you can see it, flee it; if you can hear it, clear it."
David Maddern added:
The Scientific principles
Make thyself as flat as possible
the warning.. the smell of ionized oxygen- ozone aka the beach
If the warning is effected pre the
principle then something else might take the charge and try not to
remember that we are made of water and some soluble salts plus some
insoluble bits. Don't think coins in the pocket are going to make
a lot of difference.
Another principle is that if you are within the square of the height of the nearest thing then you SHOULD be protected.
Experience by many would indicate that principles arent everything.
Gerald Cairns replied:
I am not so sure about the reliability of your last principle. When our
kids were young we took them camping and fossiking near Scone NSW and
camped on the banks of a creek near some pine trees. The weather looked
fine but a storm built up at dusk just as I was sitting on the floor of
the tent with the gas bottle and lamp between my knees lighting it. Our
son was looking out of the window at the storm when there was an
almighty deafening crash. Son fell back screaming with pain in his ears
and I looked at the crown jewels to see if they were still there. Then
we smelt burning and I grabbed the fire extinguisher and ran outside to
find the grass on fire at the base of a pine tree maybe 30 cm from the
trunk and about a couple of metres from the tent. Fire was put out and
on investigation the strike point was identified as a small very
blackened hole in the ground about the size of a 20 cent piece in the
centre of the fire. The tree was not touched yet the bolt must have
passed down through numerous branches to reach the spot where it stuck.
I reckoned we had learned enough of lightning that night so we quickly
vacated the tent and placed all spare fuel etc. a safe distance away
and spent a wild and uncomfortable night in the car. Fortunately no
more near misses occurred but all I can say from this limited
experience and one other is that the process appears to be highly
unpredictable except for certain well known dangerous activities like
balloons on wires etc.
The other "near miss" was quite recently when I opened the back door to
go upstairs having shut down all electronics until the storm had passed
as is our routine and I was blasted backwards under the house by a bolt
that struck without warning very very close but on later investigation
when the rain had stopped the strike point was not found. I suspect
Peter took the safest option. There is an emeritus professor of
electrical engineering at UQ, Prof. Matt Darveniza Lightning &
Transient Protection Pty Ltd, who has developed a folding aluminium
tripod under which you can crouch and according to him be relatively
safe. He has demonstrated himself using discharges up to hundreds of
thousands of volts but I am not volunteering.
His hypothesis seems sound and to work but his safety device has been
ignored commercially. His advice is to crouch down with feet as close
to gether as possible. I am not sure if he is still active but I do
have a phone number if anyone wants it.
David Maddern commented:
Yep, can only concur hence the shouting SHOULD
There's a man in Hobart who makes lightening conductors for buildings, and that is big business. I gather he uses rare earths.
Gary Dalrymple responded:
In a slightly different context, beyond the 'cone of silence' effect of
mobilephone repeaters/towers and the six watts at 1 cm Vs howmany watts
at hownany metres: as people complain about them being 'too close' to
schools and playing fields, surely it must occur to some protesters
that these structures make excellent supplimentry lightning rods to
keep the kiddies safer?
Currently bathing in the refracted glory of 1,000 watts per square of Nuclear Fusion powered EMF
Gerald Cairns replied to Hilly:
Hi Hilly,
I am not going to argue with the
concept that tall objects are more likely to be struck but as in our
camping experience the bolt passed down through the branches of a tall
tree without apparently hitting them but stuck the ground within about
30 cm of the trunk? There is more to this than simply tall objects
methinks. The chaotic ionization of the air/rain as the bolt progresses
is probably an important factor.
David Martin related:
An interesting (and scary) anecdote.
I had a similar experience in the UK many years ago. Whilst picking
strawberries in an open field on a thundery day, my hair stood on end
quite spectacularly. There was no lightning though, despite the immense
amount of charge passing over the ground - a worry at the time
nevertheless!
Some physics now.
There is no theoretical reason why metal would "attract" lightning. So
far as I'm aware, there is no experimental evidence either: this is
just another "old wives' tale".
The physics of lightning is not completely understood, however. The
main reason is that the electric fields, generated by electric charge
in thunderclouds, are generally too small (by a factor of about ten) to
initiate lightning strikes.
Some recent work supports the idea that the trigger for a strike is a
charged particle cascade initiated by a cosmic ray. There was an
article in Scientific American recently (as I recall), but see, e.g.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning#Runaway_breakdown_theory
This would mean that lightning strikes, although broadly confined to
the region of high electric field under a thundercloud, would be
otherwise
essentially random.
As regards protection, it follows directly from Coulomb's law that the
*static*
charge on a conducting object sits on the outside; hence the idea of a
Faraday cage, inside which there is no charge and no electric field. A
lightning strike is far from a static event, however. Nevertheless, if
the material is highly conducting, charge flows to the surface in a
much shorter time (picoseconds) than the duration of the strike
(microseconds) so the strike is relatively static. You're probably
safest inside a car - the metal chassis would be a reasonably effective
Faraday cage. The relative safety of a car, of course, has nothing
whatever to do with the "insulating" rubber tyres: a few centimetres of
rubber is no insulation at all at a billion volts.
Kevin Phyland answered:
I've been following this thread from afar...most of the advice has been sound enough that there was no need for me to comment.
Having said that, there are a number of interesting facets of lightning not yet discussed.
Firstly, lightning is notoriously
bad at actually killing you (about 10% of people hit by lightning are
killed). This is probably due to the fact that lightning goes around
the surface of a human body normally (surface flash burns).
The metal thing has at least one
basis in fact though. Metal conducts electricity very well. When the
charge builds up on the ground near a thunderstorm it tends to
accumulate at points (so things like metal rods and Hills hoists are
really good charge accumulators). The basics (as currently understood,
and David correctly points out that this is far from *fact*) is that when the charge difference between cloud base and ground is large enough, basically a spark starts to move...
(As an aside, trees are also
nasty. Not so much for their conductive properties (they have a fairly
high resistance) but when they get struck they heat up...explosively!!!
Shrapnel from bark and wood is very dangerous...)
Here's where it gets
interesting...the first current surges are essentially random movements
where ionisation has created small paths for charge to flow. But then
normal air resistance causes the pooled charge (sorry if I play fast
and loose with terminology here) halts and doesn't move on until a new
lower resistance channel can be established. This doesn't take all day
btw...a matter of nanoseconds...and then the current flows off again.
Now...when the charge channel gets
close enough to the ground (maybe 50 or 100 metres) the opposite
charges on points on the Earth's surface and the cloud charges start
attracting each other like crazy...this actual means that the initial
bolt starts from the Earth-based object...i.e. if you are struck by
lightning you are struck from below not above.
If you have hair rising the charge difference (i.e. potential difference) is significant and scary.
Yep...squat down and place your
feet as close together as possible...and don't go out and get the
washing off the metal clothes line...this has caused a number of
fatalities...if you make sure that the ONLY path for the current is
THROUGH your body rather than AROUND your body...you are dead.
My thoughts anyway,