The Australian Government writes to Indonesian Government in favor of an Australian woman who is accused of smuggling 4.1 kg of cocaine into Indonesia. It is expected, if she convicted, she will get life imprisonment. She caught with red handed,though she is still denying to own this and accused some corrupt baggage handlers for having corrupted her baggage. But why should they do that, if they can't be assured of getting this baggage delivered some where again. She seems to be a liar though it is up to her to told the interrogative personnel's whatever she thought is in her betterment and eviction and acquitting. But the question is not this if she is an smuggler or not, but if she or he from west in the case of white skin are above the law of third world. It happened many time before whenever a wester-en accused of wrong doing in the third world always been acquitted of the charges and send back to west where he or she got heroes welcome. I can recall some years back when two Australian nurses accused of killing their nurse mate in Saudi Arabia got acquittal after enormous pressure from Australia and west. Such types of episodes also been observed in India, Pakistan, UAE, Kuwait, Bahrain and else where in Africa and Latin America etc. Are wester-en alway right or they are some sort of angels? Why the western Government thought their citizens are always innocent and immune to be punished. Is that not double standard and wrong?
