This is the biggest fraud of the 20th century that is still being perpetrated now in the 21st! I have known for some time that many space experts have reached this conclusion after looking through the amazing amount of evidence that is around. In fact is it so obvious that you will kick yourself when I point it out to you.
Look at any photo, supposingly taken on the Moon, and I you will be looking at a fake! Why? Well , I will tell you. The cameras supposingly used on the Moon were modified Hasleblads, using standard Kodak colour film. Film 'foggs' when it is exposed to radiation so the fact that all the shots were apparently unaffected points to one conclusion...that they were not taken on the Moon of course! And look at the inky black backgrounds in the pictures, where are the stars?
Here are some other important points that you should know:-
1) The budget for the lunar lander alone came to around $150 million! Yet it was a flimsey affair made of thin Alluminium sheet, like a conventional aircraft! My reckoning is that they spent thousands and SYPHONED OFF millions to fund BLACK PROJECTS such as Area 51 and Aurora, without Congress having to know!
2) Around the Earth at a minimum altitude of around 350 miles are the Van Allen Belts (VAB). This is where earths magnetic field captures solar radiation and concentrates it. The area immediatly above the atmosphere and below the belts is known as Low Earth Orbit (LEO). This is a relatively safe area of space where ALL manned missions have taken place, ie Mir, Skylab and Space Shuttle. NO manned mission has or could leave LEO because of the dangerously high Radiation levels in the VAB. We all absorb around 150 Rem every year and this we can cope with but radiation in the VAB's can exeed 2000 Rem every day! The radiation, in the belts, is so strong, in fact, that it can kill a man within minutes! An extreme hazard indeed for any Astro/Cosmonaunt trying to leave earth and LEO!
The U.S. Military made this radiation hazard even worse when they secretly exploded a nuclear device within the belts with the purpose of 'blowing a hole in them' back in the 50-60's! How can you blow a hole in a planets magnetic field? You cant!
Right now the clincher- the shielding effect of our atmosphere is the same as 23 feet of soil, or 6 feet of Alluminium! Without adquate shielding we would all die from radiation sickness yet we are asked to belive that Astronauts travelled through the belts, for up to 2 hours, in a vehicle made of very thin material, vitually transparent to Gamma rays, endured the constant solar wind for a week and then returned back through space and the belts again without experiencing a single side effect!!! "Duh, do they think we are thick?"
3) The pictures of the Eagle lander both 'landing' and 'taking off from the Moons surface' are the most obvious fakes of the lot. The 'hypergollic' rocket propellant, that we are told was used, creates huge, dark red, opaque, clouds of smoke in use. Yet as you will remember Neil Armstrong and the world could see the Moons surface clearly right to the moment of touchdown!
The famous 'take off' shot is so ridiculous its laughable. Even though the Moons gravity is six times less than Earths the 'escape velocity' of the Moon is still over 4000 mph, so to leave the surface and reach a successfull orbit the Astronauts would obviously have to start the rocket motor, yes? Well apparently not! If NASA's picture is to be belived the blast from the 'exploding bolts', that seperate the landers top and base, is all that is needed!!! "Duh again!"
4) When a rocket is aimed at the ground it tends to melt and blast out material, which covers anything nearby and leaves a V bottomed crater. Now take a look at pictures of the lander at rest on the Moon.
 |
 |
What strikes you? No crater! In fact there is not even a speck of dust out of place!!! You would expect to see melted rock stuck all over the landers legs and feet but yet again they are as pristine as when they left the factory! Notice how the United States sign is clearly visable, even though it is in full shadow! What better way to get congress to continue funding the space program?
5) Light travels in straight lines. Yes? Well not if NASA's pictures are to be belived!
First remember this: No additional light scources, flash bulbs etc were taken to the Moon and the Astronauts cameras were mounted at chest hight on their suits. Ok now take the famous picture of Buzz Aldrin on the moon.
 |
Examine the area around him. The light deminishes the further it is away from him. Now as the surface everywhere in the picture should be of the same luminosity this can only be explained if he was standing under a spotlight!
Now look at the horizon reflected in his visor. The real horizon coincides almost exactly with the reflection. This cannot have been taken by an Astronaut, with a chest mounted camera, as it can only have been taken from a hight of around 6-7 feet! Wait there's more!
The sun is behind and to the right of him, so he should be in silhouette, yes? Well no! Again NASA's pictorial record is shown to defy the known laws of physics! We can cleary see all the front and left of him, as though a fill-in light Was used! In fact this is the same for shots of the lander on the Moon too!
I can go on and on about this all day, but hey, dont just take my word for it. For the complete run-down on what has got to be the biggest ever 'piss-take' of peoples intelligence, check out this book:-
