Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW
HIGH FOOD COSTS CONTINUE

The future? Higher food costs! And an increasingly higher percentage of disposable income for food!! This is not something just to be read in the newspaper. It is something that will be felt and something Lithuanians are going to experience as reality. Food is going to continue to be expensive the day after tomorrow and increasingly more expensive after that because the government’s leaders have been ignoring and are continuing to ignore the high food costs in Lithuania’s economy.

For those who are rich and well-off, food prices are generally of little concern because food prices constitute a small percentage of their disposable income. But for the rest of the population facing high heating costs and higher energy costs, their economic well-being will deteriorate this winter.

I have just returned from a 10-day visit to Lithuania. The purpose of my trip was to talk to some dairy farmers about their conditions and their problems; to talk with some milk processors and inquire about their problems in the marketing of their products, their problems that involve government and the pricing system; to talk about subsidies and payments to farmers; and the loss of markets (primarily Russia). I spoke with a member of the parliament serving on the agricultural committee. I spoke with journalists. I spoke with university people. I spoke with families and also with consumers. I drove many, many kilometers viewing in sadness Lithuania’s idle capital - its unused agricultural lands. I was informed of the recent bankruptcy of a large cooperative milk processing plant.

Though there was much that I saw and heard that would warrant deep pessimism, I was moved emotionally by the underlying strength that Lithuanians evidenced in their talk and comments. They wanted some direction, some goals. They wanted to see a government that understood and acted on the problems of the dairy farmer and the problems of the dairy industry. They were disgusted with patchwork and the indifference of temporary cures.

One farmer commented to me, “What is there that a farmer can do? How can we make conditions better, produce more milk cheaper and profitably? There is no guidance, no help or interest on the part of the government to study our problem and make recommendations like you do in America.” Then in a most interesting and humorous analogy, he commented, “Our government, our president, our agriculture minister, our parliament ministers are all ostriches when it comes to problems of agriculture.” When I asked what he meant, he said, “I am told that when this big, flightless, running bird confronts a problem, he hides his head in the sand and believes himself to be unseen. I regret that I have to describe our peoples’ representatives in government in this manner.”

This incident reminded me of our former American president, F.D. Roosevelt, during World War II, when he said to the American people, “ We must live as men, and not as ostriches.”

To the question of how can milk be made cheaply in Lithuania so that it could be competitive anywhere in the Europe, Russia, and the global market, my answer was: I strongly believe that Lithuanian dairy farmers can produce milk as cheaply or cheaper than any country in Europe, but under very specific conditions:

1. If you want to produce clean, cheap milk, you must produce a large volume of milk per cow per man.

2. For this to become a reality, farms must become specialized.

3. For a farm to be profitable, constant attention must be given to keeping costs down -- constantly seeking ways to reduce costs to stay competitive. This is positively a must, a number 1 condition, without which there will be no success.

4. It is difficult to be successful and have a profitable dairy operation if you don’t enjoy working with dairy cows. If they are not profitable, it is impossible to enjoy them.

5. You do not have to be big to be profitable. A specialized dairyman will basically only milk cows. He will have his cows harvest his own forage crops as pasture and he will buy any needed grain and roughage from yet another farmer who has his own specialty - raising crops. The dairyman and his family, with a very minimum amount of equipment capital investment, can milk 20 - 50 cows as a specialized milking business.

It is increasingly apparent that there is a glaring contradiction in that, on the one side, there are high food prices and, on the other side, huge numbers of hectares of productive agricultural lands unused, neglected, and capital structures lying idle, with a large number of unemployed agricultural workers. How can any sensible person not be shocked? How can anyone not recognize that something is seriously wrong? How can a government be observing this ongoing economic severity, this painful and devastating economic disaster engulfing the farms and fundamentally ignore it? How could a succession of prime ministers believe that, after the destruction of the production units and the so-called “entrance” into the free economy, a newborn dairy industry would survive the entrenched, self-centered capitalists of the “free marketing” structure. To see how foolhardy this is, you only have to imagine a lamb entering into an arena of lions. Who could expect the lamb to grow into a survivor that would compete for its economic life.

My point here is that there is no possible way that a concerned Lithuanian government can divorce itself from the milk industry if the country has a vital economic interest at stake. Indeed, there is no question that the dairy industry has been and is still very vital to the economic health of Lithuania, both now and in the future. I find it absolutely unbelievable that, as far as I know, there still does not exist a comprehensive study on how cheaply milk can be produced in Lithuania. I am told that, if there is one, it is kept secretly locked up in Holland’s government vault.

I was asked if the free market was best left to itself to work out the problems of supply and the pricing of milk. The answer is very simple: There is NO free market in the milk industry. There never was, there is none now, and there never will be. In all countries - in Europe, the U.S., Canada - where there is a dairy industry, there is government involvement in very significant and varying degrees in supply management (quotas) and in pricing of milk. The excess milk produced in a country will have varying subsidized prices which are specifically determined to move this excess out of the country. A free market in global trade is an illusion! Cheap, subsidized food as a permanent source of cheap food is also an illusion.

Concerning the E.U. and Lithuania as relating to milk product prices - that is a matter of negotiated self-interests. Question: Who in the E.U. is interested in milk products from Lithuania? Why and under what conditions? Imagine a new-born lamb (Lithuania) and full-grown lions (E.U.) with full sets of teeth and claws negotiating selected positions from time to time. The weak never win.

How does Lithuania become a lion? With teeth and claws? It has to produce a lot of clean, high quality, cheap milk so that processors can produce excellent quality milk products competitively priced in the global markets. There is not much to fear if Lithuania should decide to develop a dairy industry and become an exporter of quality milk products. It is going to take considerable time to build up the industry. And it will demand not only effort, but Lithuania’s brain power.

On the morning of my departure from Lithuania I had the pleasure of meeting again with a dedicated Lithuanian, Jonas Macys, presently Mayor of Vilkaviskis. Jonas Macys is a farmer by inheritance and training and, when not in public service, farms intensively. He was an original member of the Seima and served as vice-chairman of the agricultural committee in the formative years of independence.

No one who breathes Lithuanian air is more concerned about his Lithuania, its people, and the Lithuanian farmers. His summary to me warrants the deepest attention and respect from all of us: Dairying is Lithuania’s largest industry. It is the most important industry that directly affects peoples’ health and economic well-being. It has always been a mainstay in Lithuania’s economy and must continue to be so. The solution to the problem demands the attention and concern of not only farmers, but also those people who live in cities. The success of the dairy industry demands the political support and participation of all active voters. Government’s inattention will cost all of us in higher costs for food and a lower standard of living.

“Watch,” says Macys, “and experience the next six months. They are not going to be pleasant, and could be brutal for many.”

This is not a pleasant ending to my commentary. But problems are solvable if they are viewed realistically, and brains are employed wisely in reaching solutions. The power of voters lies in their voices and in their right arms when voting time arrives. And in a democracy, voting time always comes around. There is a saying in America: “What goes around, comes around.” If something is done poorly, the results will come back to face you. If something is not done politically and is neglected, the consequences will be addressed by the voting right arm of citizens in the coming elections.

Jonas Macys asked me to please return so that I could talk with more groups of farmers. He is in favor of encouraging these meetings. I thanked him for his thoughtful and kind invitation and we parted with warmth and my continued respect for an outstanding and dedicated public servant.


RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

Home Books Guestbook E-Mail