GRACE AND SALVATION
What is the grace of God? The Greek word translated grace has
as its
root idea the concept of bringing joy and gladness through gifts. The
Apostle
Paul uses this word to refer to the unmerited and freely given favor
and
mercy which God bestows upon the sinner in salvation. Through this
grace,
the sinner is delivered from sin and judgment. This grace, though
freely
given, is precious and costly, for its basis is the saving work of
Jesus
Christ. A salvation that is received by grace is the very opposite of a
salvation that is earned by working or by obeying the law of God. A
person
who is saved by grace has no basis for boasting in his salvation for he
has done nothing to earn or merit it. The gospel of grace is the only
true
gospel. Those who teach a salvation that is earned or merited through
obedience
of any sort have to some degree fallen from the teachings of grace into
legalism.
Being justified freely by His GRACE through the
redemption
that is in Christ Jesus. (Romans 3:24)
Now to him who works, the wages are not counted as
GRACE but as
debt. (Romans 4:4)
But the free gift is not like the offense. For if by
the one man's
offense many died, much more the GRACE of God and the gift by the GRACE
of the one Man, Jesus Christ, abounded to many. (Romans
5:15)
And if by GRACE, then it is no longer of works;
otherwise GRACE
is no longer GRACE. But if it is of works, it is no longer GRACE;
otherwise
work is no longer work. (Romans 11:6)
For you know the GRACE of our Lord Jesus Christ, that
though He
was rich, yet for your sakes He became poor, that you through His
poverty
might become rich. (2 Corinthians 8:9)
I marvel that you are turning away so soon from Him
who called
you in the GRACE of Christ, to a different gospel. (Galatians
1:6)
You have become estranged from Christ, you who attempt
to be justified
by law; you have fallen from GRACE. (Galatians 5:4)
For by GRACE you have been saved through faith, and
that not of
yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should
boast.
(Ephesians 2:8-9)
(God) has saved us and called us with a holy calling,
not according
to our works, but according to His own purpose and GRACE which was
given
to us in Christ Jesus before time began. (2 Timothy 1:9)
What is the relationship of God's grace to salvation? There are
three possible answers to this question.
A few argue that there is no grace in salvation.
Some maintain that salvation is mostly of grace.
And others say that salvation is all of grace.
The position that salvation is not at all a gracious gift from God but
a human achievement based on personal goodness and moral self-effort is
characteristic of pagan religion and philosophy. Early in church
history,
a British monk named Pelagius tried to teach pagan moralism as
Christian
doctrine. Pelagius was condemned as a heretic, and his system was
labeled
Pelagianism. In Pelagianism, the saving work of Christ is not
necessary;
a man can save himself by leading a good and moral life. Yet even the
Pelagian
claims to teach a salvation by grace. According to the Pelagian, it is
only by the grace of God that he was created as a man, a noble creature
with the moral ability to earn heaven, and not as a frog or a rock.
When
the Pelagian speaks of the grace associated with salvation, he is
referring
to the grace of creation which is common to all men. When the orthodox
Christian talks about salvation by grace, he is referring to the
special
grace of God which is based upon the work of Christ and which saves
undeserving
sinners.
There are many systems that teach that salvation is mostly of
grace
but not all of grace. The most common of these are semi-pelagianism and
Arminianism. What is common to all these systems is the idea that the
work
of Christ has only made salvation a possibility for all but not a
finished
reality for any. God has done His part, and now those who are willing
to
do their part will be saved. In these systems, although God has the
major
role in salvation, it is the human contribution to salvation that turns
the point and makes the difference between heaven and hell. Where these
various systems differ is in defining the human contribution that
results
in salvation. It can be one or any combination of a number of spiritual
acts and attitudes, such as nonresistance to the Holy Spirit,
cooperation
with the Holy Spirit, faith, works, obedience, perseverance, baptism,
church
membership, etc. In these systems, the saving work of Christ is
necessary
for salvation but not sufficient. The sinner must supplement the work
of
Christ to obtain salvation.
The doctrines of grace are the teaching that salvation is all
of grace.
The saving work of Christ is both necessary and sufficient to save
sinners.
In this system, it is the cross of Christ without compromise which
makes
the difference between heaven and hell. There is no room for any
boasting
whatsoever. The Calvinist looks at others who have rejected Jesus
Christ
and who remain in bondage to sin and says, "There but for the grace of
God go I." The Calvinist recognizes that he did not turn the point in
his
salvation. He did not respond to the gospel in faith because of any
natural
goodness or wisdom which sets him apart from others. All the glory goes
to Jesus Christ, for He has done it all. Even the ability to come to
Christ
in saving faith is a gift based upon the cross of Calvary. At the
cross,
Christ purchased for His people deliverance from the spirit of
unbelief.
Through His resurrection, He secured for His people the spiritual life
which enables them to savingly believe. When a sinner is converted in
response
to the preaching of the gospel, it is because Christ has poured out His
Holy Spirit upon him to apply to his heart the saving power of Christ's
death and resurrection.
The doctrines of grace are the teaching that Jesus came into
this world
to save sinners. Jesus saves sinners. It is not that Jesus saves
sinners
when given the proper help. Jesus and only Jesus does the work of
salvation.
Jesus saves sinners. It is not that Jesus potentially saves or makes
salvation
possible. Jesus actually saves and completely saves. His work is a
finished
work that needs no rounding out or filling in. Jesus saves sinners. It
is not that Jesus has made salvation a possibility for all but a
finished
accomplishment for no one. Jesus came to earth to make salvation a
reality
for specific individual sinners.
The doctrines of grace are usually discussed in terms of five
separate
doctrines which are called the five points of Calvinism. There is
independent
Scriptural support for each of the five points, and the five points are
logically related such than any one of them implies the other four. The
five points are easily remembered with the help of the acronym TULIP:
Total
depravity, Unconditional election, Limited atonement, Irresistible
grace
and Perseverance of the saints.
TOTAL DEPRAVITY
The first of the five points is the teaching of total
depravity. This
doctrine has to do with fallen man's natural spiritual state. The
doctrines
of grace teach that salvation is all of God's grace, and the doctrine
of
total depravity relates to this by demonstrating that natural man is
unable
to do anything to earn or merit his own salvation.
Fallen man has an inclination toward sinning that permeates
and dominates
his total person. Fallen man is not an absolutely depraved creature who
has reached the limits of corruption and is as evil as is possible.
Fallen
man's depravity is not absolute but total, which means that his sin
orientation
controls his total life and taints every aspect of his life. Total
depravity
is like the complete discoloration of a glass of clear water with a few
well-stirred drops of ink. The water is not as black as possible but
every
single drop has been tainted. The discoloration pervades the solution
and
becomes its dominant characteristic. And such is the case with fallen
man's
nature in regard to sin.
The worst of men can do good in outward conformity with the
law of God
(Luke 6:33). This does not mean, however, that such deeds are good in
the
eyes of God. At issue in God's measure of good is not only outward
conformity
but also proper motivation, disposition and aim. The proper motivation
is love for God and fellow men (Matthew 22:37-40). To have the proper
goal,
one must seek above all else to glorify God (1 Corinthians 10:31) and
to
promote His righteous rule in all of life (Matthew 6:33). The proper
disposition
is belief in God's Word (Hebrews 11:6). In relation to this standard of
good, the Bible says "There is none who does good, no, not one" (Romans
3:12) and "All our righteousnesses are like filthy rags" (Isaiah
64:6).
The Bible teaches that fallen man in his natural state is at
enmity
against God and cannot please Him (Romans 8:7-8). He does not seek
after
God and he does not do good (Romans 3:11-12). He has gone astray and
has
turned to his own way (Isaiah 53:6). Apart from the gift of God's
regenerating
grace, he is morally unable to come to Christ in saving faith (John
6:65;
10:26; 12:39-40). Emotionally, he loves moral darkness (John 3:19) and
the things of Satan (John 8:44), and he hates God's light (John 3:20).
Intellectually, the things of God are foolishness to him (1 Corinthians
2:14) and his understanding is darkened (Ephesians 4:17-18; 2
Corinthians
4:4; John 8:43,47). Volitionally, he has been taken captive by the
devil
to do his will (2 Timothy 2:26; John 8:44). In regard to his total
being,
he is spiritually dead (Ephesians 2:1; John 5:25).
Fallen man is totally depraved and in need of a Savior from
the time
of his conception. The verse most often quoted to prove this is Psalm
51:5,
where the Psalmist David said: "Behold, I was brought forth in
iniquity,
And in sin did my mother conceive me." Those who deny the morally
depraved
nature of infants tend to speculate that this verse is teaching that
David
was an illegitimate child. Even if one accepted this highly improbable
interpretation of this verse, there are still other verses which
clearly
teach what is commonly called the doctrine of original sin:
Psalm 58:3: "The wicked are estranged from the
womb;
They go astray as soon as they are born, speaking lies."
Isaiah 48:8: ". . . I knew that you would deal very
treacherously,
And were called a transgressor from the womb."
The doctrine of original sin can also be deduced from the Scriptural
teaching
that all men in their natural state have a corrupt nature and the
Scriptural
teaching that a person's basic nature is established from birth. In
Ephesians
2:3, the Apostle Paul made the statement that Christians before their
conversion
"were BY NATURE children of wrath." Jesus taught this same essential
truth
when He compared the sinner to a bad tree that can only bear bad fruit
(Matthew 7:18). The bad tree does not environmentally develop its
natural
propensity to bear bad fruit. This is its very nature from the
beginning
of its existence. Scripture teaches that a person's basic nature, like
that of the bad tree, is already established at the time of his birth.
John 3:6 says: "That which is born of the flesh is flesh," the word
flesh
referring to a fleshly or carnal sin nature. After Adam fell into sin,
we read that his son was born in his image (Genesis 5:3); that is to
say,
the moral image of a sinner.
Fallen man is unable to come to Christ in saving faith not in
the sense
that God is prohibiting him or erecting any external barriers. The
inability
is moral and arises from fallen man's heart condition. Fallen man is
free
in the sense that he is free to do as he pleases, free to act
spontaneously
in accordance with his own inclinations. But what we are determines
what
we want. And what we want determines what we will to do. People are
like
fruit trees whose roots determine what sort of fruit they bear. A bad
heart
can no more produce good than a thornbush can produce grapes (Matthew
7:16-18).
One can only bring forth evil from an evil heart (Matthew 12:34-35).
Thus,
sinful man's freedom to do as his heart desires is slavery to sinful
living
(Romans 6:20). He cannot do good or seek after God (Romans 3:11-12).
Free
agency plus a depraved nature produces not a free will but a will
enslaved
to sin (2 Peter 2:19).
Some today view the lost in their natural state as drowning
men desperately
looking for a life line. Scripture paints a much more desperate
picture.
Man in his natural state is like a man who has already drowned and is
dead
(Ephesians 2:1). Fallen man is in a state of total spiritual inability
and can contribute nothing toward his own salvation. When a man
savingly
believes, the saving power of Christ has already delivered him from his
state of spiritual death. The man who believes (present tense) is the
man
who has passed over (past tense) from death unto life (John 5:24-25;
cf.
1 John 5:1).
OBJECTIONS AGAINST TOTAL DEPRAVITY
The main argument commonly used against the doctrine of total
depravity
is not a Biblical argument at all but a philosophical argument. And we
must take care not to be theologically defrauded through human
philosophies
and worldly axioms (Colossians 2:8). This philosophical argument is
that
moral responsibility implies moral ability, that ought implies can.
According
to this axiom, since God holds fallen man accountable for believing in
Christ, then fallen man must have enough spiritual life and goodness
within
himself to savingly believe. If fallen man ought to believe, then
fallen
man can believe. And, by implication, if fallen man does not have
within
himself sufficient moral goodness to obey the Gospel command, then God
cannot hold him accountable for this moral failure. In other words,
ability
limits responsibility.
In some contexts, this principle does apply as a general rule.
For example,
in a well run office, the responsibilities of the workers should be a
fair
measure of their office abilities, and vice versa. But there are other
contexts where this principle simply does not apply. For example, only
the baseball player who is up to bat has the ability to drive home runs
or to strike out. Yet if the player at bat does strike out and thus
loses
the game, the whole team loses.
Which of these two analogies best fits Adam's situation when
he fell
into sin? Was he an office worker who alone was fired because of his
failure?
Or was he a player up to bat who struck out for an entire team? The
Bible
gives us the answer: "for by one man's disobedience many were made
sinners"
(Romans 5:19a).
Normally a person cannot be held accountable for the sins of
another
or rewarded for the obedience of another (Ezekiel 18:20). The two
exceptions
are Adam and Jesus. When Adam sinned in the Garden, He did so as the
covenant
head of the human race. When Jesus, the second Adam, obeyed even to
death
on the cross, He did so as the covenant Head of all who believe in Him.
"For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive" (1
Corinthians 15:22; cf. Romans 5:12-21).
Adam as originally created had both the moral responsibility
to obey
God and the moral ability to fulfill that responsibility. When Adam
sinned
in the Garden, he lost his native moral ability. That was one dimension
of the death which God had warned would result from sin. Adam did not,
however, through his disobedience lose any of his moral responsibility
to obey God. Just as squandering the family inheritance does not
somehow
automatically lessen financial obligations, so Adam's loss of original
righteousness did not relieve him or his posterity of their obligation
to obey God. After his fall into sin, Adam no longer had the moral
ability
to meet his continuing moral obligation. He retained the moral ought
but
lost the moral can. And that is the situation his children, the human
race,
have inherited.
In addition to the Bible's teaching on the relationship of the
human
race to Adam's first sin, the Bible also teaches very clearly that a
moral
ought does not necessarily imply a moral can. For example, the Bible
teaches
that those who are accustomed to doing evil ought instead to do good.
The
Bible also teaches that those who are accustomed to doing evil can no
more
do good than the leopard can change his spots (Jeremiah 13:23).
This axiom also proves too much. Limiting its application to
Gospel
obedience is quite arbitrary. If ought implies can, then everybody has
the moral ability to live a sinless life because living a sinless life
is what everyone ought to do. The consistent application of this axiom
leads to pure Pelagianism, the teaching that fallen man has the moral
ability
to save himself by living a morally perfect life.
Finally, this axiom implies that a perverse and corrupt heart
is an
excuse for sinning. If responsibility implies ability, then no ability
implies no responsibility. But this is not what the Bible teaches. For
example, Christ compared false prophets to bad trees that cannot bear
good
fruit. Here is a clear case of moral inability. They cannot bear good
fruit.
Does this mean that God releases such men from their responsibility to
bear the good fruit of godly living? No, not at all. "Every tree that
does
not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire" (Matthew
7:19).
An evil heart is no excuse for sin. On the contrary, a hardened and
incorrigible
heart is all the more reason for judgment.
Other Scriptures which contradict the "ought implies can"
axiom are
easy enough to find (Romans 8:7,8; 9:18,19; 1 Corinthians 2:14; John
6:44).
UNCONDITIONAL ELECTION
The second point is unconditional election. To elect is to
chose, and
I assume all would agree that God's people are His chosen people (1
Peter
2:9). The real issue is why God chose the people He did. Is it because
they met some condition, passed some test, were better or wiser than
others?
Or is God's choice all of grace and totally a matter of God's mercy
upon
the undeserving? The doctrine of unconditional election teaches the
latter.
God elected His people before time began (Ephesians 1:4) and
thus made
His choices before the people involved had actually done anything good
or evil. From this basic fact, Paul argues that God's election is based
not on human will or works but on God's sovereign choice to have mercy
on whomever He will have mercy (Romans 9:10-16).
The Christian chooses God when he savingly believes, but it is
God's
choice that is primary and deciding. An old hymn expresses it this
way:
I sought the Lord, and afterward I knew
He moved my soul to seek Him, seeking me;
It was not I that found, O Savior true;
No, I was found of Thee.
Thou didst reach forth Thy hand and mine enfold;
I walked and sank not on the storm-vexed sea;
'Twas not so much that I on Thee took hold
As Thou, dear Lord, on me.
I find, I walk, I love, but O the whole
Of love is but my answer, Lord, to thee!
For Thou wert long beforehand with my soul;
Always Thou lovest me.
It is not that God chose His people because He foresaw that they would
believe or live holy lives. Rather God's people believe and obey
because
God freely chose in eternity past to give them grace in Christ Jesus
(Acts
13:48; 18:27; Ephesians 1). God's choice of a people was not the result
of their faith and holiness but rather is the cause of their faith and
holiness (Ephesians 1:4; 2:10; 2 Thessalonians 2:13). As Jesus said in
John 15:16: "You did not choose Me but I chose you and appointed you to
bear fruit."
The Christian should not think that God has chosen him because
he is
any better than others. Paul spoke of sinful humanity as one common
lump
of clay, and of God as the divine Potter who chooses from this common
lump
some clay to make vessels unto mercy and some to make vessels unto
wrath
(Romans 9:20-23). God chooses His people not because they are naturally
better clay than others. In fact, God's chosen people before their
salvation
are often the more foolish and weak and lowly so that God will have all
the glory for their salvation (1 Corinthians 1:27-29). God's choice is
not because of human merit but according to His own purpose and grace
(2
Timothy 1:9; Ephesians 1:5).
Some question God's fairness in giving free grace to some
while allowing
the rest to remain in their slavery to sin (Romans 9:18-20; 1 Peter
2:8).
We must remember that fairness would be for God to allow all to remain
in sin and under judgment. God's choice to save some is all of mercy
and
grace.
But, you say, what about Romans 8:29 where it says that those
whom God
foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son?
Does this not mean that God before the foundation of the world looked
ahead
into history to see who would believe and obey and then chose them to
be
His people? That would mean that faith and obedience are the cause or
condition
of God's election. That would mean that God in eternity past did not
plan
out history but merely passively observed history to see what would
happen.
Since we must allow Scripture to interpret Scripture, this
understanding
of divine foreknowledge cannot be correct. Scripture clearly teaches
that
faith and good works are the result of God's election, not the cause or
reason for God's choice (Acts 13:48; Ephesians 2:10; John 15:16). Also
Scripture teaches that the reason God is able to know the future is
because
He is in total control of the future (Isaiah 46:8-11). The idea that
God
knows the future without having planned it and without controlling it
is
totally foreign to Scripture.
Also notice that Paul in Romans 8 was not talking about
foresight but
about foreknowledge. Foreknowledge does not refer to God's finding
those
who merit salvation but rather to God's setting His heart and
affections
upon those whom He has chosen to freely give salvation. The
foreknowledge
of Romans 8:29 is God's saying "Yea, I have loved you with an
everlasting
love; therefore with lovingkindness I will draw you." In eternity past,
God, standing above time and history, looked in love upon certain
children
of Adam who, like all the rest, deserved only God's wrath, and He chose
to give them mercy and grace in Christ Jesus.
Romans 8:29 does not speak of God's knowing something about
people but
of God's personally knowing certain people. This is not the passive
knowledge
of the intellectual observation of events but the active knowledge of
personal
acquaintance and friendship. Scripture elsewhere speaks of this
intimate,
personal sort of knowledge:
Psalm 1:6: The Lord KNOWS the way of the
righteous, but
the way of the wicked shall perish.
Amos 3:2, with God speaking to the children of Israel: You
only
have I KNOWN of all the families of the earth.
Genesis 18:19, with the LORD speaking of Abraham: For
I have KNOWN
him, in order that he may command his children and his household after
him, that they keep the way of the LORD, to do righteousness and
justice,
that the LORD may bring to Abraham what He has spoken to him.
The doctrine of election is a part of the larger teaching that God is
in
sovereign control of every detail of history. God is not just one
influence
among others, such as fate, chance and human whims. God is in absolute
and total control of all that happens, and this should be the greatest
of comforts to all those who love and trust Him.
Some, however, object that if God is in sovereign control of
history,
then people are just robots, history is just a cosmic computer
printout,
and God is morally responsible for evil. The same Bible, however, that
teaches the sovereignty of God also teaches that God is not the
responsible
author of evil, that man is a free moral agent who is not forced to sin
and who is responsible for what he does, and that history is a
meaningful,
dynamic process. Our limited minds may not be able to comprehend how
man
can be a responsible moral agent while God is totally sovereign, but
God's
ways are above our ways (Isaiah 55:8-9). "How unsearchable are His
judgments,
and His ways past finding out" (Romans 11:33). The teachings of human
responsibility
and divine sovereignty are like two parallel lines that meet only in
infinity.
We cannot understand how both can be true because of the limitations of
our finite minds, but God can understand such matters and God has told
us that both are true. That should settle the matter for us.
If God is in sovereign control, this means that there are no
real chance
happenings. From the human perspective, some events do appear to be
accidental.
For example, the parable of the good Samaritan speaks of a certain
priest's
coming down a road by chance (Luke 10:31). And Ruth, we read, just
happened
to glean in the field of Boaz (Ruth 2:3). Also, from the human
perspective,
the arrow that killed King Ahab was fired at random (1 Kings 22:34).
Yet
the death of King Ahab in that battle had been planned by God and
prophesied
by God's prophet.
According to Scripture, God is in control of all events. As it
says
in Ephesians 1:11:
". . . (God) works ALL THINGS according to the
counsel
of His will."
See also Daniel 4:35; Isaiah 14:24 and Isaiah 46:9-11.
God is in control of all things, even to the fall of the
sparrow and
the number of hairs on our heads (Matthew 10:29-30). There are no
exceptions
to this rule. When there are calamities, God is in control (Isaiah
45:7;
Ecclesiastes 7:14). When there are physical handicaps, God is in
control
(Exodus 4:11). When evil men come to power, God is in control (Exodus
9:16;
4:21; Romans 9:18). And when someone believes or rejects the gospel
message,
God is in control (Acts 13:48; 1 Peter 2:8; Romans 9:16).
The doctrine of election is difficult, and God has not
answered all
our questions. The Christian should respond to election not with an
arrogant
curiosity into the unrevealed secrets of God (Deuteronomy 29:29) but
with
an humble gratitude to God for His unmerited mercy. The non-Christian
should
respond not with useless worry as to whether his name is on God's
secret
list but with a prayerful seeking to obey the Gospel command to believe
on the Lord Jesus Christ.
PARTICULAR ATONEMENT
The third point is particular or "limited" atonement, perhaps
the most
misunderstood of the five. At issue here is the reason why the cross of
Christ does not save everyone. Those who do not savingly believe in
Christ
will suffer eternal punishment and will never be reconciled to
God.
Why does the cross not save all? Is it because God has limited
power
in the cross or because God has a limited purpose for the
cross?
Did God intend to save everyone through the cross and fail, or did He
plan
to save only a limited number through the cross and succeed? Our
position
is the latter. We believe that God had a limited design or purpose in
the
atonement and that the cross of Christ saves everyone God intended
it
to save.
We believe this because God never fails to carry out His
plans. If God
had intended the cross to save everyone, then everyone would be
saved
through it. What God has planned, that He will do (Isaiah 46:9-11;
55:11; Daniel 4:35; Ephesians 1:11).
We believe this because the Bible teaches that Jesus came to
accomplish
a real and saving salvation for His people. He did more for them than
provide
a mere possibility of salvation. See Matthew 1:21; 26:28; Acts
20:28;
Ephesians 5:25-26; Titus 2:14; Hebrews 2:17; and Revelation 5:9.
We believe this because the Bible says that God will give
everything,
including saving faith, to those for whom He delivered up His Son to
die
(Romans 8:32). If we were reconciled to God at the cross, then we will
be saved (Romans 5:10). Through His work on the cross, Christ provided
for the deliverance of His people from the spirit of unbelief and
purchased
for them the gift of saving faith.
We believe this because the Bible teaches that the Good
Shepherd laid
down His life for His sheep (John 10:11) but no where teaches that the
Good Shepherd in like manner laid down His life for those who are not
His
sheep (John 10:26). Christ's sheep are those whom the Father has given
Him (John 10:29), and they manifest themselves through their faith and
obedience; that is, they in faith recognize Jesus as the Messianic Good
Shepherd and listen to His voice and in obedience follow Him (John
10:3-4,
27). Christ died for the sheep, and all the sheep will savingly
believe.
Christ died for those whom the Father gave Him, and all these will come
to Christ and none of them will be lost (John 6:37,39). Those who are
not
Christ's sheep manifest themselves through their moral inability to
believe
(John 10:26).
We believe this because Christ as high priest prayed only for
those
whom the Father had given Him (John 17:9). If Christ had offered up His
life as a priestly sacrifice for everybody, then why did He not also
offer
up His priestly prayer for everybody?
We believe this because it would not be just for God to
require double
payment for sin. If Christ died equally for the sins of all men, then
those
who go to hell will be paying for their sins themselves even though
their
sins have already been paid for once through the sufferings of Christ.
We believe this because the Bible speaks of individuals for
whose sins
there was never to be any atoning sacrifice (1 Samuel 3:14; Isaiah
22:14;
Hebrews 10:26; cf. Jeremiah 18:23).
This doctrine does not deny that the cross has infinite saving
potential.
It teaches that the cross could save everyone if God had only intended
it to do so. This doctrine does not deny that there are common grace
benefits
from the cross for every man. In this sense, God through Christ is
everyone's
Savior (1 Timothy 4:10). The doctrine of limited atonement is simply
that
the cross of Christ provides a sure, secure and real salvation for
everyone
God intended it to save and for them alone.
But, you ask, what about passages which mention the world and
use the
universal term all? These passages do not teach that God planned for
the
cross to save every sinner that ever lived. These passages no more
refer
to every individual without exception than Paul's statement that the
gospel
"was preached to every creature under heaven" (Colossians 1:23) means
that
even the slugs and snails were evangelized. Passages with universal
terms
must be interpreted with careful consideration of both the immediate
context
and the clear teaching of other verses. For example, what did Paul mean
in Romans 5:18 when he said that "the free gift came to all men,
resulting
in justification of life"? He could not there be referring to all men
without
exception because the Bible clearly teaches that not all men will be
saved.
Paul's context in Romans 5 indicates that by "all men," he was there
referring
to all men who are under the covenant headship of Christ. The message
of
some other passages with universal terms is that Christ has saved the
world
in the sense that His people are now from every tribe, nation and
tongue
of the world and not from only one nation as under the old covenant.
Christ
also will take away the sin of the world in the sense that He will
totally
remove sin and the curse from the world at His second coming.
Some object that if Christ did not die for all men without
exception,
then we cannot go up to the lost and say, "Christ died for you!" But
where
in all of Scripture do we find an example of that sort of evangelistic
message? We should follow the example of the Apostle Paul and say to
the
lost, "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved." That
message
is the gospel truth and in no way contradicts the doctrine of limited
atonement.
All are commanded to come to Christ, and none who come will be cast
out.
And all whom the Father has given to Christ (i.e., the elect for whom
Christ
died) will come (John 6:37).
The doctrine of limited atonement also does not contradict the
sincere
nature of God's gospel offer. Our Lord Jesus Christ genuinely grieved
when
Jerusalem rejected Him (Matthew 23:37), and this sorrow reached to the
depths of His divine Person. God takes no pleasure in the death of the
wicked and sincerely exhorts them to turn from their wicked ways and
live
(Ezekiel 18:23,32). God really desires obedience to His revealed will,
His commands (Deuteronomy 5:29), including the gospel command to
believe
in Christ. And yet at the same time, God, in terms of His secret will,
has sovereignly planned all of history to bring to Himself the greatest
possible glory. He has sovereignly chosen to give saving grace to some
to the praise of His mercy, and He has sovereignly chosen to pass
others
by and allow them to remain in their depraved state to the praise of
His
justice.
Romans 9:14-16: What shall we say then? Is
there unrighteousness
with God? Certainly not! For He says to Moses, "I will have mercy on
whomever
I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whomever I will have
compassion."
So then it is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who
shows mercy.
Romans 9:21-23: Does not the potter have power over
the clay,
from the same lump to make one vessel for honor and another for
dishonor?
What if God, wanting to show His wrath and to make His power known,
endured
with much longsuffering vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, and
that He might make known the riches of His glory on the vessels of
mercy,
which He had prepared beforehand for glory?
There is here admittedly a degree of mystery beyond our understanding,
for we cannot fully comprehend the interworkings of the secret and the
revealed aspects of God's will (Deuteronomy 29:29), nor the
relationship
between divine sovereignty and human responsibility. All we know is
that
when someone rejects the gospel message, the fault is theirs and God is
grieved; and when someone believes the gospel, the reason is God's
sovereign
gift of undeserved grace and God alone deserves the glory and the
praise.
IRRESISTIBLE GRACE
The fourth point is irresistible grace or effectual grace.
This point
logically follows from the three we have discussed so far. If fallen
man
is totally depraved and at enmity against God and unable to do anything
good, then grace must be irresistible if any are to be saved. If fallen
man has to pay the price of not resisting the gospel while still in his
natural state as a son of Adam, then no man will be saved, for no son
of
Adam has the native moral ability to pay that price. If before the
foundation
of the world, God "predestined us to adoption as sons by Jesus Christ
to
Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will" (Ephesians 1:5)
and
if God's sovereign plans never fail, then God's saving grace must
always
be effectual. If the Good Shepherd laid down His life for the sheep and
then gives all the sheep eternal life (John 10:11, 28), then logically
the work of the atonement must be applied without fail to all for whom
Christ died.
According to the doctrine of irresistible grace, the spiritual
state
of heart that unfailingly results in repentant saving faith is a gift
God
gives to His people. Saving faith is not something that fallen man is
able
to do by means of his own natural spiritual abilities as a token
payment
to God in exchange for the otherwise free gift of salvation. The
ability
to savingly believe is a gift from God, as evidenced by the following
verses:
John 6:65: Jesus said: "No one can come to me
unless
it has been granted to him by My Father."
Acts 13:48: And as many as had been appointed to
eternal life
believed.
1 Corinthians 4:7: For who makes you differ from
another? And
what do you have that you did not receive? Now if you did indeed
receive
it, why do you glory as if you had not received it?
Romans 11:36-37: Or who has first given to (God) And
it shall
be repaid to him? For of Him and through Him and to Him are all things,
to whom be glory forever. Amen.
Acts 5:31: Him God exalted to His right hand to be
Prince and
Savior, to give repentance to Israel and forgiveness of sins.
Acts 11:18: Then God has also granted to the Gentiles
repentance
to life.
Acts 14:27: (God) had opened the door of faith to the
Gentiles.
Acts 16:14: The Lord opened (Lydia's) heart to heed
the things
spoken by Paul.
Acts 18:27: (Apollos) greatly helped those who had
believed through
grace.
Philippians 1:29: For to you it has been granted on
behalf of
Christ ... to believe in Him ...
Philippians 2:12-13: ... it is God who works in you
both to will
and to do for His good pleasure.
Romans 9:16: So then it is not of him who wills, nor
of him who
runs, but of God who shows mercy.
Ephesians 2:8-10: For by grace you have been saved
through faith,
and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest
anyone
should boast. For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for
good
works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them.
Further evidence for irresistible grace is found in the Biblical data
on
the inner and the outer calls of the Gospel. The outer call of the
Gospel
is that general call to repentant faith in Christ which comes to all
who
hear the Gospel message. The outer call is a promise that all will be
saved
who will comply with the Gospel condition of genuine faith. It is a
command
that tells the sinner of his obligation before God to respond to the
Gospel
message with this genuine faith. This general call is accompanied by a
general working of the Spirit that causes a temporary conviction of sin
and a temporary desire for salvation through Christ. Many who receive
this
outer call reject the Gospel (Matthew 22:14). All totally depraved
sinners
successfully resist this outward call and general work of conviction
(cf.
Acts 7:51) if these are not accompanied by the efficacious inner
call.
The inner call of the Gospel occurs when the Holy Spirit
accompanies
the preaching of the Gospel with life giving power. All those and only
those who receive this inner call from God respond to the Gospel with
truly
saving faith.
Romans 8:30: Those whom God has called, He
also justified.
1 Corinthians 1:23-24: We preach Christ crucified: a
stumbling
block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles but to those whom God has
called,
both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.
The general call, like sheet lightning, is grand and beautiful but
never
strikes anything. The special call is like the forked flash from
heaven.
It strikes somewhere and does an effectual work. And who can resist it
(cf. Romans 9:19)?
Further evidence for irresistible grace is found in the
language Scripture
uses to describe the regenerating work of the Spirit. In places, this
work
is compared to a spiritual birth. The sinner contributes no more to his
spiritual begetting than a baby contributes to his own conception. For
a baby to do anything, he must first be given life; and for a sinner to
see and enter the kingdom of God, he must first be born again (John
3:3,5).
The new birth as the beginning of spiritual life is a secret work of
the
Holy Spirit that can no more be seen or controlled than the coming and
going of the wind (John 3:8). In this begetting of life, the Holy
Spirit
works in conjunction with the Gospel message, which the Holy Spirit
empowers
as a life giving seed (1 Peter 1:23; James 1:18). The effective agent
in
this begetting of life is not the will of man but the will of God (John
1:13; Romans 9:16).
The book of First John teaches that those who are truly born
again will
manifest repentance, faith and good works just as surely as the newborn
baby manifests life through crying and eating (1 John 2:29; 3:9; 4:7;
5:1,4,18).
Though one cannot see the Holy Spirit implant spiritual life in a
heart,
one can see the effects of this new life, just as one cannot see the
wind
but can hear the sound it makes (John 3:8). The spiritual effects of
this
divinely implanted life are not temporary but endure and remain (1 John
3:9).
Scripture also compares regenerating grace to a new creation
(2 Corinthians
4:6; 5:17). And what creature has ever successfully resisted his own
creation
or made any active contribution to his own creation? When the Word of
God
goes forth as a word of new creation, it creates spiritual life just as
surely as God's words "Let there be light" brought light to a darkened
world.
Scripture also refers to regenerating grace as a spiritual
resurrection
(Ephesians 2:4-5; John 5:25). When the gospel goes forth in word only,
it goes forth to men dead in sins who have no spiritual life or ability
wherewith to answer. But when the gospel goes forth in Spirit and in
power,
it carries with it the life giving power of Christ. In such
circumstances,
the sinner can no more stay in the sepulcher of spiritual death and
refuse
to come to Christ than could Lazarus have disobeyed when Christ spoke
the
life giving words, "Lazarus, come forth" (John 11). Will any of the
physically
dead be able to resist the voice of Christ when He calls them from
their
graves (John 5:28-29)? Neither can the spiritually dead resist the
voice
of Christ when He calls them to spiritual life through the gospel in
the
power of the Spirit (John 5:25).
PERSEVERANCE OF THE
SAINTS
The fifth point is the perseverance of the saints, perhaps the
most
misused of the five points. Some imagine that the perseverance of the
saints
means that once a person has made a public profession of faith, he must
be considered a Christian regardless of what sort of life he lives.
This
is not what this doctrine teaches at all.
This doctrine teaches that those who truly have come to saving
faith
in Christ will persevere in the faith. Jesus Christ saves His people
not
only from hell but also from the dominance of sin in this life (Matthew
1:21). Sin cannot lord it over those who are truly the people of God
(Romans
6:14; 1 Corinthians 6:9-10). They are a new creation in Christ Jesus;
old
things have passed away (2 Corinthians 5:17).
The saints will persevere, and those who persevere are the
saints. We
cannot see God's secret books in heaven or penetrate into the inner
recesses
of the human heart to see who the saints really are. We are limited to
looking at a person's life to see if it is consistent with his
profession
of faith. As our Lord Jesus said, "For a good tree does not bear bad
fruit,
nor does a bad tree bear good fruit. For every tree is known by its own
fruit" (Luke 6:43-44).
We must avoid the opposite errors of legalism and license.
Contrary
to legalism, personal holiness is not meritorious; that is, we are
saved
by grace and not of works (Ephesians 2:8; Titus 3:5). Contrary to
license,
personal holiness is a necessary, not an optional part of the true
Christian
life; that is, we are saved from a life of sin and unto good works
(Titus
2:14; Ephesians 2:10). Good works are not the cause of our salvation or
the reason for our salvation. They are an inevitable and necessary
result
of our salvation. We were chosen in Christ unto holiness (Ephesians
1:4).
We were chosen for salvation through sanctification and belief (2
Thessalonians
2:13-14). Without holiness, no one will see God (Hebrews 12:14).
There are those who profess faith in Christ and join the
church who
later abandon the faith and return to worldly living. A person who does
that is giving evidence that he is not a Christian and never has been a
Christian in the sense of having been in genuine covenant union with
Christ
and having experienced the new birth. As 1 John 2:19 says,
They went out from us, but they were not of us,
for if
they had been of us, they would have continued with us; but they went
out
that they might be made manifest, that none of them were of us.
The person who submits to water baptism but then returns to the mire of
sinful living is but a washed pig who never experienced a spiritual
change
of nature (2 Peter 2:22). Paul, speaking in terms of the old covenant,
explained that not all who are of Israel are truly Israel and that one
can be a Jew outwardly without being a Jew inwardly. In John 15, Jesus
referred to the covenant breaker as one who had outwardly been a branch
on the Vine but who had never truly abode in the Vine as the source of
life. Apart from the Vine, the branch cannot bear fruit and will be cut
off in judgment (cf. Romans 11:17). Also, Christ referred to the
covenant
breaker in the parable of the soils. A plant in stony ground has no
real
depth of soil and spiritual root and thus cannot endure tribulation for
the faith. A plant in thorny ground is choked by the thorns of love for
the world and thus cannot bear spiritual fruit. The good ground plant,
however, bears much fruit and cannot become a covenant breaker. Those
who
are truly born again will overcome the world and the devil does not
touch
them (1 John 5:4,18).
If a person who is truly and inwardly a child of God cannot
lose his
salvation, then why does God warn them against denying the faith and
falling
into sin? This is a good question. The answer is that God has ordained
not only the ends but also the means unto the ends. And God uses
warnings
to keep His true people on the straight and narrow. An example of
something
similar is found in Acts 27. Paul was on a ship in a great storm, and
an
angel revealed to Paul that no life would be lost in the storm (vv.
23-24).
Then some sailors sought to abandon the ship in the lifeboat, and Paul
then warned the soldiers, "Unless these men stay in the ship, you
cannot
be saved" (v. 31). As a result of this warning, the soldiers cut off
the
lifeboat and let it fall away, thus preventing any sailors from
abandoning
the ship. God used the warning to fulfill the promise He had given to
Paul
through the angel.
Well, what about the apostasy passages? These passages do not
contradict
the doctrines of grace. Those who apostatize have never truly been
saved.
They may have outwardly been a member of God's covenant community and
may
have experienced firsthand many of God's blessings. For example, Judas
was one of the twelve who had been given the power to cast out demons,
to heal the sick and to raise the dead. In the Sermon on the Mount,
Jesus
spoke of those whom He never savingly knew but who on judgment day will
claim to have prophesied, cast out demons and done many wonders in
Christ's
name. And in Hebrews 6, the one who falls away is said to have partaken
of the Holy Spirit and to have tasted the powers of the age to come.
But
none of these passages teach that the one who falls into apostasy was
ever
genuinely saved.
With great opportunity comes great responsibility. Scripture
teaches
that if, after such an intimate exposure to God's covenant, one rejects
the covenant to the point of deliberately and maliciously trampling
under
foot the blood of Christ, then the day of gospel opportunity ends
(Hebrews
6:4-6; 10:26; 12:17). The judgment for apostasy is a divine abandonment
to a seared conscience and a hardened heart. The apostate never was
saved
and never can be saved.
There are many Scriptures which plainly state that all those
who truly
believe already possess everlasting life and will be kept in the faith
by the power of God. I will close by listing a sampling of these:
John 3:16: For God so loved the world that He
gave His
only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but
have
everlasting life.
John 10:28: And I give them eternal life, and they
shall never
perish; neither shall anyone snatch them out of My hand.
Romans 8:35-39: Who shall separate us from the love
of Christ?
Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or
nakedness,
or peril, or sword? As it is written, "For Your sake we are killed all
day long; We are accounted as sheep for the slaughter." Yet in all
these
things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. For I am
persuaded
that neither death, nor life, nor angels nor principalities nor powers
nor things present nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any
other
created thing, shall be able to separate us from the love of God in
Christ
Jesus our Lord.
I Peter 1:3-5: Blessed be the God and Father of our
Lord Jesus
Christ, who according to His abundant mercy has begotten us again to a
living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, to
an inheritance incorruptible and undefiled, and that does not fade
away,
reserved in heaven for you, who are kept by the power of God through
faith
for salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.
CONCLUSION
The doctrines of grace are certainly humbling. It is humbling
to think
that when I sin, the fault is totally mine, but if I do any good, the
credit
must go entirely to God. It is humbling to learn that there are
doctrines
that I will never fully understand because of my limitations as a
finite
creature. It is humbling to find out that but for the grace of God, I
would
still be in bondage to sin. It is humbling to discover that I found God
only because He first found me. It is humbling to realize that I stand
firm in the faith only because God keeps me from falling. These
doctrines
are very humbling, and perhaps that is why not all Christians accept
them
in spite of their strong and clear Biblical basis.
In our theologizing, the temptation is to look for elements of
human
sovereignty in our deliverance, to theorize ways to hold God
responsible
for our mistakes, and to hope that there might not be some degree of
truth
in Satan's claim that man can be "as God" (Genesis 3:5). We have to
mature
in the faith and become familiar with Scripture before we overcome this
temptation in our theologizing and sermonizing. But, as C.H. Spurgeon
has
pointed out, all true Christians pray in terms of the doctrines of
grace.
All true Christians pray in terms of divine sovereignty and human
responsibility
and never in terms of human sovereignty and divine culpability. We
lower
our eyes, smite our breast, and cry out, "God, be merciful to me a
sinner!"
We never look God proudly in the eye and say, "God, I thank you that I
am the man I am!" Allow me to leave you with Mr. Spurgeon's thoughts on
this subject:
"You have heard a great many Arminian sermons, I
dare say;
but you never heard an Arminian prayer -- for the saints in prayer
appear
as one in word, and deed and mind. An Arminian on his knees would pray
desperately like a Calvinist. He cannot pray about free will: there is
no room for it. Fancy him praying, "Lord, I thank thee I am not like
those
poor presumptuous Calvinists. Lord, I was born with a glorious
free-will;
I was born with power by which I can turn to thee of myself; I have
improved
my grace. If everybody had done the same with their grace that I have,
they might all have been saved. Lord, I know that thou dost not make us
willing if we are not willing ourselves.ÿ20 Thou givest grace to
everybody;
some do not improve it, but I do. There are many that will go to hell
as
much bought with the blood of Christ as I was; they had as much of the
Holy Ghost given to them; they had as good a chance, and were as
blessed
as I am. It was not thy grace that made us to differ; I know it did a
great
deal, still I turned the point; I made use of what was given me, and
others
did not -- that is the difference between me and them."
That is a prayer for the devil, for nobody else would
offer such
a prayer as that. Ah! when they are preaching and talking very slowly,
there may be wrong doctrine; but when they come to pray, the true thing
slips out; they cannot help it. If a man talks very slowly, he may
speak
in a fine manner; but when he comes to talk fast, the old brogue of his
country, where he was born, slips out."
|