The Science of Creationism

I wrote this as a persuasive paper for my Critical Thought and Writing class here at college. I thought I did a pretty good job, so I decided to post it here. If you have any questions/comments, etc, just e-mail me at rin_from_Saturn@yahoo.com. I highly recommend the Drange article if you're interested in further reading. So, enjoy!

Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden vs. Darwin and his apes. This has been the battle since Darwin went against the conservative theistic views of the world and looked for a reason WHY. Darwin wasn't satisfied with the idea that we were made out of mud. He was not satisfied with the theory of creationism. He had to discover more. But many people in the world still believed and still do believe the traditional story of Adam, Eve, the Serpent and the Apple, or other creation stories of thier particular religions. Creationist theories should be taught in schools, specifically high schools, along with evolution.

Evolution is just one theory about how everything got on this earth. There are many other diverse theories, but that is what they all are: Theories. None of them can be completely proven. “The great problem for evolutionists is to prove, explain, and demonstrate the ‘design and creation’ of complex biological structures by evolution. . . None of these requirements for proof of evolution has been accomplished. Consequently, we are not being ‘unscientific’ by believing in the God of Creation”(New York Times Editorial 1).

Children who do not receive the various creationist points of view are missing out. Schools have an obligation to make the children more productive, open minded, and social members of society. Because there are still people in the world who do not believe in evolution, the other theories of creation should be presented and discussed. That way the children can decide for themselves, which theory they believe. They can get a more rounded world-view. They can understand more peoples of the world and their cultures, and thus become more educated members of scociety.

Creationism also has place in high school cirriculum because it can be a very scientific study as well. “Since naturalistic creationism does not appeal to anyting outside the bounds of science, it could be a scientific theory,”(Drange 4). Creation can be studied within the bounds of science becasue it deals with a question that someone is looking to prove. It deals with creation, but psychology deals with creativity of the human mind, and thus creation. Therefore, creation can be studied as a science for the same reasons that psychology can(Drange 4). Because creationism is a theory just as evoloution is, it can be studied as a science, and thus would have place in an academic class, even a science class in conjunction with evolution.

Furthermore, it is unconstitutional not to teach all ideas of creation. The constitution states that the government cannot make laws for OR against any religion due to the freedom of religion clause in the first amendment. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of relgion, or probhibiting the free exercise thereof;...”(U.S. Government 1). Schools cannot be told that they have to teach creationism, but they cannot be told that they can not.

We must take each theory of how everything came into being on faith. We must come to know what we believe. We must have the opportunity to learn about what different people believe in order to yet further our own beliefs. It is unconstitutional not to give all people this opportunity. In this spirit, Creationism should be taught in schools along with evolution.

Works Cited
Anonomous. “New York Times,” October 4, 1999, proquest.com, http://prouest.umi.com/pqweb.
Drange, Theodore M. “Can Creationism Be Scientific?”, 1998. FirstSearch, http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/theodore_drange/creaonism.html
U.S. Government. FindLaw, October 25, 1999. http://caselaw.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment01/.

[home]

Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!