Posts By: Jeff Cutsinger
Date | Post | Topic |
02/16/2007 | Lisp webcomic | Lisp webcomic |
05/11/2006 | I'm not a member of the | Cyclone 1.0 released. |
02/06/2006 | hypothetical question | hypothetical question |
01/31/2006 | Short Answer | PyPy |
01/18/2006 | "Common Person" programming | Lisp is sin |
01/21/2006 | It's even easier | New for Python 2.5 |
09/14/2005 | This sounds so familiar | Visual Basic and LINQ |
09/02/2005 | Annoyance | Ruby on Rails: An Interview with David Heinemeier Hansson |
08/18/2005 | Executive Summary please | Neko 1.0 |
08/19/2005 | Cool, thanks | Neko 1.0 |
08/10/2005 | A decent measure | Expressivity |
08/05/2005 | I'm calling it | Overloading - Syntactic Heroin? |
08/04/2005 | Even assuming | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
08/10/2005 | You have a good point | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
08/06/2005 | Easy there | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
08/08/2005 | Let's measure your success | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
08/05/2005 | No. | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
08/04/2005 | nothing new to js | A Lisp to JavaScript Compiler in 100 Lines |
08/04/2005 | kind of neat but not really lisp | A Lisp to JavaScript Compiler in 100 Lines |
08/03/2005 | How about | A Java/Python hybrid? |
07/29/2005 | Multiple inheritance isn't bad | A Typed Intermediate Language for Compiling Multiple Inheritance |
07/28/2005 | maybe | ML without GC |
07/28/2005 | Allow me | A software engineering problem: how would functional programming solve it? |
07/22/2005 | Tuareg Mode | On the Revival of Dynamic Languages |
07/21/2005 | type inferencing is hardly co | On the Revival of Dynamic Languages |
07/21/2005 | would it be possible to have | On the Revival of Dynamic Languages |
07/21/2005 | I don't think that partial ev | On the Revival of Dynamic Languages |
07/21/2005 | Not to be picky, I note that | On the Revival of Dynamic Languages |
07/21/2005 | smalltalk isn't any lazier than lisp | Grady Booch: Software Engineering Grand Challenges |
07/11/2005 | Underestimates what typing can do | Static Typing Where Possible, Dynamic Typing When Needed |
07/12/2005 | Contentless | Static Typing Where Possible, Dynamic Typing When Needed |
07/14/2005 | Bootstrapping | Static Typing Where Possible, Dynamic Typing When Needed |
07/16/2005 | bootstrapping | Static Typing Where Possible, Dynamic Typing When Needed |
07/12/2005 | Originality is good | Static Typing Where Possible, Dynamic Typing When Needed |
08/18/2005 | I fail to see | Static Typing Where Possible, Dynamic Typing When Needed |
07/05/2005 | Malbolge figured out? | Malbolge figured out? |
07/03/2005 | LyX | Martin Fowler on Language Workbenches and DSLs |
06/27/2005 | Why templates? | "dynamic" generative programming? |
06/30/2005 | So are you saying that your i | "dynamic" generative programming? |
06/26/2005 | DT guys | Scottish Programming Language Seminar |
06/21/2005 | Another issue | Why recursing is better than looping |
06/22/2005 | We never said recursion was intuitive | Why recursing is better than looping |
06/23/2005 | yep | Why recursing is better than looping |
06/20/2005 | Of course | Book stats |
06/10/2005 | HP's Dynamo | HP's Dynamo |
05/31/2005 | More clarification | What is so bad about compiling? |
05/19/2005 | so sweet | LLVM 1.5 has been released! |
05/08/2005 | I believe he claims they take | GADTs + Extensible Kinds = Dependent Programming |
07/22/2005 | Not really redundant | GADTs + Extensible Kinds = Dependent Programming |
07/26/2005 | Well. | GADTs + Extensible Kinds = Dependent Programming |
07/26/2005 | Pros and Cons | GADTs + Extensible Kinds = Dependent Programming |
05/01/2005 | response | Call for Papers: ACM Symposium on Dynamic Languages |
05/02/2005 | not necessarily bad | What makes Centum a bad language? |
05/02/2005 | Not so much criticism | What makes Centum a bad language? |
04/29/2005 | Hey, we can all quit thinking about PLs | From Perl Monks: "pissed off about functional programming" |
04/30/2005 | Sarcasm is easier to convey IRL | From Perl Monks: "pissed off about functional programming" |
05/08/2005 | Perhaps a simpler explanation | From Perl Monks: "pissed off about functional programming" |
04/26/2005 | Completely unwarranted jab | Why do they program in C++? |
04/19/2005 | May I be cynical? | Why Dependent Types Matter |
02/20/2005 | Taking an analogy too far | What are The Atoms of Programming Languages? |
07/18/2005 | Ha ha | BitC, a new OS implementation language |
01/05/2005 | Don't forget Single Assignment C | The Free Lunch Is Over: A Fundamental Turn Toward Concurrency in Software |
12/10/2004 | Obligatory Lisp fan response | Casting SPELs in Lisp |
11/18/2004 | You have it backwards | Skribe 1.2b released |
11/19/2004 | skribe is static | Skribe 1.2b released |
10/27/2004 | There is definitely obvious u | Scheme Language Standardization Process: R6RS Progress Report |
09/22/2004 | Is an implementation on the way? | Looking for Classic Types Thread |
09/08/2004 | Yeah | The Human-Language Interface |
08/20/2004 | Video Lan Client | Erlang the Movie |
07/17/2004 | Optional dynamic ("duck") typing | New CLR Language: Boo |
12/02/2003 | Re: The Revised C++ Language Design Supporting .NET | The Revised C++ Language Design Supporting .NET |
11/04/2003 | Re: Bertrand Meyer on Software Quality | Bertrand Meyer on Software Quality |
LtU Topic Index Sorted by Date | LtU Topic Index Sorted by Topic | LtU Index of Post Authors | Zipped LtU Archive |