Posts By: marco
Date | Post | Topic |
07/08/2012 | Jeff Hawkins @ Numenta | Emerging Languages Camp at Strange Loop |
07/13/2012 | Scratching an itch is fun? | Why languages and not systems? |
06/24/2012 | Darwintunes.org | Evolved Turing neural networks - Unorganized machines and the brain |
06/18/2012 | Don't get it... | Null, bottom, etc.? |
06/18/2012 | Didn't help | Null, bottom, etc.? |
06/18/2012 | On second thought | Null, bottom, etc.? |
06/18/2012 | I understand Bottom from a Denotational Perspective | Null, bottom, etc.? |
06/19/2012 | The Smoke Screen Evaporated | Null, bottom, etc.? |
06/19/2012 | This Discussion Hit Bottom | Null, bottom, etc.? |
06/19/2012 | Well. Actually I was | Null, bottom, etc.? |
06/21/2012 | It's a mess... | Null, bottom, etc.? |
06/21/2012 | It's defined by undefined=undefined. | Null, bottom, etc.? |
06/22/2012 | - | Null, bottom, etc.? |
06/17/2012 | Lazy evaluation _is_ | Why are exceptions not described as 'purely functional'? |
06/17/2012 | Well, uhm, I might not understand higher-order logic anymore.. | Why are exceptions not described as 'purely functional'? |
06/17/2012 | "Would the replacement of | Why are exceptions not described as 'purely functional'? |
06/01/2012 | Well... | Interactive Tutorial of the Sequent Calculus |
06/01/2012 | Ah well... | Interactive Tutorial of the Sequent Calculus |
06/01/2012 | On another note... | Interactive Tutorial of the Sequent Calculus |
06/01/2012 | Yah | Interactive Tutorial of the Sequent Calculus |
06/15/2012 | Is it just me | Interactive Tutorial of the Sequent Calculus |
06/15/2012 | Wonderful | Interactive Tutorial of the Sequent Calculus |
06/15/2012 | Quantifying over Thin Air... | Interactive Tutorial of the Sequent Calculus |
06/17/2012 | Technicalities | Interactive Tutorial of the Sequent Calculus |
06/17/2012 | Uhm, to be really boring, | Interactive Tutorial of the Sequent Calculus |
06/17/2012 | Counterexample | Interactive Tutorial of the Sequent Calculus |
06/17/2012 | Oh cool | Interactive Tutorial of the Sequent Calculus |
06/17/2012 | LOL | Interactive Tutorial of the Sequent Calculus |
06/17/2012 | No, it was set-theoretics. | Interactive Tutorial of the Sequent Calculus |
06/01/2012 | In my experience... | Pythonect (A New Programming Language) Call for Syntax! All feedback and comments are appreciated! |
05/21/2012 | Recursive Types don't Equal Computable... | Proofs as programs |
05/09/2012 | Brainless | Proofs as programs |
05/09/2012 | Ah well. | Feather: A Heapless Functional Programming Language |
06/18/2012 | Nice... ;-) | Escaping the Maze of Twisty Classes |
02/13/2012 | Simply Typed Lambda Calculus? | Teaching challenge: culturally enriching formulae-as-types |
02/13/2012 | Position Information | Syntax Desugaring Algorithm Question |
12/27/2011 | Academia is one model in which invention can happen | Cambridge Course on "Usability of Programming Languages" |
12/28/2011 | Graph theory. Discrete math. | Cambridge Course on "Usability of Programming Languages" |
12/28/2011 | Bad Hair Day | Cambridge Course on "Usability of Programming Languages" |
12/30/2011 | Man, whatever... | Cambridge Course on "Usability of Programming Languages" |
12/30/2011 | So many bad hair days... | Cambridge Course on "Usability of Programming Languages" |
12/24/2011 | Unfortunately... | Designing a languge — what theory is a must? |
12/24/2011 | Monads... | 2 Misconcepts About Functional Programming (relating to context and monad) |
12/24/2011 | Liked that | 2 Misconcepts About Functional Programming (relating to context and monad) |
12/24/2011 | Semantics | 2 Misconcepts About Functional Programming (relating to context and monad) |
12/04/2011 | You're not finding any | Models for distributed parallelism |
10/14/2011 | Fish | Dennis Ritchie passed away |
10/12/2011 | I don't see the problem | Simple Question - Beta reduction and pattern matching (compile time, static) |
10/12/2011 | NP | Simple Question - Beta reduction and pattern matching (compile time, static) |
10/08/2011 | The Last American | Open thread: RIP Steve Jobs |
10/03/2011 | I must have done something | Language/Compiler design blogs? |
10/03/2011 | No problem, I didn't work on | Language/Compiler design blogs? |
09/24/2011 | I am a lighthouse, your call. | Redesigning the Mozart virtual machine |
09/24/2011 | Bandwidth | Redesigning the Mozart virtual machine |
09/24/2011 | Toto, we're home. | Redesigning the Mozart virtual machine |
09/24/2011 | Truth emerges more readily from error than confusion | Redesigning the Mozart virtual machine |
09/24/2011 | Out of Budget | Redesigning the Mozart virtual machine |
09/26/2011 | Or just copy the design | Redesigning the Mozart virtual machine |
09/18/2011 | Basics | What needs to be done? |
09/18/2011 | Overhaul | Forum Topics and Story |
09/18/2011 | Hmm | Forum Topics and Story |
09/21/2011 | Don't Agree | Forum Topics and Story |
09/21/2011 | +1 | Forum Topics and Story |
09/22/2011 | Mood Killer | Forum Topics and Story |
07/20/2011 | I wonder what I did | Implementor's guide/tutorial to delimited continuations? |
07/20/2011 | No idea, it never happens (I hacked it) | Implementor's guide/tutorial to delimited continuations? |
07/20/2011 | Yes, each R introduces an S | Implementor's guide/tutorial to delimited continuations? |
07/19/2011 | It would help if you would | Implementor's guide/tutorial to delimited continuations? |
05/27/2011 | Whatever you get published is science... | Advice for a young researcher |
05/28/2011 | When I look at it, I think | Advice for a young researcher |
05/28/2011 | I suggest you look at places | Advice for a young researcher |
05/28/2011 | Hey, I want to help, but I | Advice for a young researcher |
05/28/2011 | Ah well, might as well make | Advice for a young researcher |
05/28/2011 | Still not sure I am the one to ask | Advice for a young researcher |
05/28/2011 | You could try CUFP, although | Advice for a young researcher |
05/25/2011 | But must have been tried before... | Yet another programming language with customizable syntax |
05/24/2011 | XKCD 871? | The Architecture of Open Source Applications |
05/25/2011 | I second this | The Architecture of Open Source Applications |
05/23/2011 | Predictable | Rob Pike: Public Static Void |
05/23/2011 | Yeah, it's subjective | Rob Pike: Public Static Void |
05/23/2011 | Ada Failure | Rob Pike: Public Static Void |
05/23/2011 | Uh, yes I think so. | Rob Pike: Public Static Void |
05/24/2011 | Hey, I accept that Ada is a | Rob Pike: Public Static Void |
05/29/2011 | Aliasing | Rob Pike: Public Static Void |
05/23/2011 | The Problem with your Story | Rob Pike: Public Static Void |
05/23/2011 | Why? I mean that... | Rob Pike: Public Static Void |
05/23/2011 | Point taken | Rob Pike: Public Static Void |
05/31/2011 | Yeah, well, they started Ada | Rob Pike: Public Static Void |
05/23/2011 | Ada | Rob Pike: Public Static Void |
05/23/2011 | See my post above. | Rob Pike: Public Static Void |
06/09/2011 | Hush! | Rob Pike: Public Static Void |
05/16/2011 | A Non-Issue | Why is tail call optimization an issue in GC'd languages? |
05/16/2011 | That's what I said | Why is tail call optimization an issue in GC'd languages? |
05/16/2011 | I agree, but have different conclusions... | Why is tail call optimization an issue in GC'd languages? |
05/19/2011 | Ah well | Why is tail call optimization an issue in GC'd languages? |
05/19/2011 | Why Rewriting doesn't need Tail Call Optimization | Why is tail call optimization an issue in GC'd languages? |
05/16/2011 | The reclamation order of | Why is tail call optimization an issue in GC'd languages? |
05/16/2011 | I know | Why is tail call optimization an issue in GC'd languages? |
05/16/2011 | Except for... | Why is tail call optimization an issue in GC'd languages? |
05/17/2011 | The Cost of Software | Why is tail call optimization an issue in GC'd languages? |
05/17/2011 | Truth is, I have no feeling | Why is tail call optimization an issue in GC'd languages? |
05/18/2011 | Thanks for that comment. | Why is tail call optimization an issue in GC'd languages? |
05/17/2011 | Stack Allocated Objects | Why is tail call optimization an issue in GC'd languages? |
05/17/2011 | Well, look at your PC and try to visualize | Why is tail call optimization an issue in GC'd languages? |
05/17/2011 | Essentially contested concept | Why is tail call optimization an issue in GC'd languages? |
05/18/2011 | More General | Why is tail call optimization an issue in GC'd languages? |
05/13/2011 | Partial Evaluation - no idea what it is? | In search of inspiration |
05/24/2011 | Quote | Enso: William Cook's new programming model |
05/24/2011 | Oh, that... | Enso: William Cook's new programming model |
04/29/2011 | Right, so academically it | Types from imported modules "leaking" into a module's public interface |
04/25/2011 | No to mention that it is | Iteration function in lambda calculus |
04/20/2011 | Not sure you'll end up with anything publishable | Wide Scope Dead Code Analysis |
06/09/2011 | Ah, you mentioned research | Wide Scope Dead Code Analysis |
02/24/2011 | Not a lot of CS | Profiel: Henk Barendregt: Lambda calculus hits the tube |
01/07/2011 | Moore's law has ended | Fast Compilers |
01/08/2011 | Better Understanding | Fast Compilers |
01/07/2011 | Heretic! | Fast Compilers |
01/07/2011 | Almost all compilers fail on performance | Fast Compilers |
01/07/2011 | It's more about generated code | Fast Compilers |
01/07/2011 | No doubt Leroy is intelligent, but so are others | Fast Compilers |
01/08/2011 | I would call that luck too | Fast Compilers |
01/08/2011 | They borrow from each other... | Fast Compilers |
01/12/2011 | Not sure I recommend it. Too Painful | Fast Compilers |
01/17/2011 | Eager Evaluated Lambda Calculus on Records with RTTI | Fast Compilers |
01/07/2011 | Not entirely true | Fast Compilers |
01/10/2011 | ...why? | Fast Compilers |
01/02/2011 | Unsolution - Just keep it simple | The AST Typing Problem |
01/04/2011 | Addendum | The AST Typing Problem |
12/15/2010 | I miss the term Reification | The fundamental limitations of parser combinators... and how to fix them. |
12/17/2010 | Reification by Wikipedia | The fundamental limitations of parser combinators... and how to fix them. |
12/14/2010 | Abstract Complexities | yacc death revisited |
12/17/2010 | Someone showed it is reducible to matrix multiplication | yacc death revisited |
12/18/2010 | All practical implementations are cubic | yacc death revisited |
12/18/2010 | True | yacc death revisited |
12/03/2010 | Reference Counting vs Tracing Garbage Collection? | Reference Counting vs Tracing Garbage Collection? |
12/03/2010 | Python, TCL8, CDL3 | Reference Counting vs Tracing Garbage Collection? |
12/05/2010 | Aware of that - Asking for Hard Numbers | Reference Counting vs Tracing Garbage Collection? |
12/05/2010 | Bacon, Petrank, Joisha | Reference Counting vs Tracing Garbage Collection? |
12/07/2010 | LOL | Reference Counting vs Tracing Garbage Collection? |
12/07/2010 | I liked the citations | Reference Counting vs Tracing Garbage Collection? |
12/06/2010 | Don't Think So | Reference Counting vs Tracing Garbage Collection? |
12/07/2010 | Elaborate, Please | Reference Counting vs Tracing Garbage Collection? |
12/07/2010 | Thanks | Reference Counting vs Tracing Garbage Collection? |
12/09/2010 | Robustness / String Support | Reference Counting vs Tracing Garbage Collection? |
12/10/2010 | Ah well | Reference Counting vs Tracing Garbage Collection? |
12/09/2010 | See the other post | Reference Counting vs Tracing Garbage Collection? |
12/05/2010 | Compile Time? Unlikely | Reference Counting vs Tracing Garbage Collection? |
12/03/2010 | Hilarious! | Haskell Researchers Announce Discovery of Industry Programmer Who Gives a Shit |
12/01/2010 | Poorly Phrased | languages with call by value only (and maybe closures)? |
12/01/2010 | Ah, and Poor Reading too | languages with call by value only (and maybe closures)? |
11/29/2010 | Praying for the End of Time | Pure and Declarative Syntax Definition: Paradise Lost and Regained, Onward 2010 |
11/29/2010 | Why? | Pure and Declarative Syntax Definition: Paradise Lost and Regained, Onward 2010 |
11/30/2010 | Well | Pure and Declarative Syntax Definition: Paradise Lost and Regained, Onward 2010 |
11/30/2010 | JSGLR | Pure and Declarative Syntax Definition: Paradise Lost and Regained, Onward 2010 |
12/04/2010 | Why go for quadratic or cubic performance? | Pure and Declarative Syntax Definition: Paradise Lost and Regained, Onward 2010 |
12/17/2010 | From what I gather | Tolerant vs. Demanding Software |
12/13/2010 | Is there room for a powerful but kinda slowish VM? | "Future of Programming Languages" panel |
11/23/2010 | If you assign probabilities to non-deterministic transitions | What is computation? Concurrency versus Turing's Model |
11/24/2010 | Buechi Automata | What is computation? Concurrency versus Turing's Model |
11/25/2010 | Fairness | What is computation? Concurrency versus Turing's Model |
11/23/2010 | Broken Link | What is computation? Concurrency versus Turing's Model |
11/23/2010 | Great Voodoo | What is computation? Concurrency versus Turing's Model |
11/25/2010 | Uh?Concurrency cannot be modeled as a non-deterministic machine | What is computation? Concurrency versus Turing's Model |
11/25/2010 | Then throw away the model | What is computation? Concurrency versus Turing's Model |
11/26/2010 | So it did boil down to fairness? | What is computation? Concurrency versus Turing's Model |
11/27/2010 | My horse just lost its shoe | What is computation? Concurrency versus Turing's Model |
11/29/2010 | Great Product | What is computation? Concurrency versus Turing's Model |
11/19/2010 | After looking at the | Clojure's Solutions to the Expression Problem |
11/15/2010 | I can only imagine the response of the 81 others | A Preliminary Survey on Functional Programming |
11/15/2010 | Very Meta | A Preliminary Survey on Functional Programming |
11/15/2010 | In an attempt to be serious about it... | A Preliminary Survey on Functional Programming |
11/15/2010 | You can't train programmers above their own level | A Preliminary Survey on Functional Programming |
11/16/2010 | Partly Agree | A Preliminary Survey on Functional Programming |
11/16/2010 | They simply learn the theories after applying them. | A Preliminary Survey on Functional Programming |
11/16/2010 | Practice | A Preliminary Survey on Functional Programming |
11/17/2010 | Ah well. Guess you're right | A Preliminary Survey on Functional Programming |
11/17/2010 | I feel... | A Preliminary Survey on Functional Programming |
11/15/2010 | On Thomas's comment | A Preliminary Survey on Functional Programming |
11/16/2010 | Ah | A Preliminary Survey on Functional Programming |
11/16/2010 | Programmers and Education | A Preliminary Survey on Functional Programming |
11/15/2010 | I will refrain from snarky remarks | A Preliminary Survey on Functional Programming |
11/15/2010 | Hehe | A Preliminary Survey on Functional Programming |
11/15/2010 | 14/19 or 14/100? | A Preliminary Survey on Functional Programming |
11/15/2010 | Moreover | A Preliminary Survey on Functional Programming |
11/20/2010 | I don't think most programmers would know the answer to that | A Preliminary Survey on Functional Programming |
11/23/2010 | I think FP is just ready | A Preliminary Survey on Functional Programming |
11/23/2010 | That | A Preliminary Survey on Functional Programming |
11/24/2010 | I get that... | A Preliminary Survey on Functional Programming |
11/09/2010 | I.e., no type inference. | Gosu Released |
11/10/2010 | Ah Well | Lambda the Ultimate seems an Overstatement (not) |
11/11/2010 | Lambda is just a Vehicle | Lambda the Ultimate seems an Overstatement (not) |
11/13/2010 | Because Lisp and λ-calculus belong to different worlds | Lambda the Ultimate seems an Overstatement (not) |
11/11/2010 | Hand Waving not Allowed | Lambda the Ultimate seems an Overstatement (not) |
11/07/2010 | Not that light | Closures without function pointers |
11/07/2010 | Should be Doable | Closures without function pointers |
11/07/2010 | I see, mostly | Closures without function pointers |
11/09/2010 | Looks Hard | Closures without function pointers |
11/09/2010 | Beg to Differ | Closures without function pointers |
11/17/2010 | Just Different Terminology | Closures without function pointers |
11/07/2010 | No | Closures without function pointers |
11/05/2010 | Dlihc Renni | yet another paradigm |
11/04/2010 | Plaidoyer for Sokoban | Conservative Logic |
11/04/2010 | Ah! Meta-physics! | Conservative Logic |
11/04/2010 | The Missing Billiard Ball? | Conservative Logic |
11/04/2010 | No idea. Looks like something different | Conservative Logic |
11/11/2010 | No reason, Just a hunch | Conservative Logic |
11/12/2010 | As I said, just a hunch | Conservative Logic |
11/13/2010 | Nice | Conservative Logic |
11/13/2010 | Old | Conservative Logic |
10/31/2010 | SaaS and Split and Join | Asynchronous Programming, Monads and Continuations in C#, F# and Scala |
10/30/2010 | I leave philosophy to Heidigger | The Myths of Object-Orientation |
11/05/2010 | Nice | The Myths of Object-Orientation |
10/22/2010 | And BTW if you plan on using make for your build system, | Looking for pointers: mixfix error recovery |
11/06/2010 | What do you want to do? | The barrier to take-up of language innovation |
10/17/2010 | A Bit Stale | The barrier to take-up of language innovation |
10/18/2010 | The Net is Patient | The barrier to take-up of language innovation |
11/06/2010 | Javascript... | The barrier to take-up of language innovation |
10/10/2010 | I like it | Haskell implementation in Javascript |
10/11/2010 | Cobbled Together | Functional random numbers without threading state |
10/13/2010 | Thief of Time | Design Principles Behind Smalltalk |
10/01/2010 | The Future was Yesterday | Software Development with Code Maps |
09/29/2010 | It doesn't fit everything, | What is the best system for experimenting with and visualizing complex algorithms? |
11/29/2010 | OT | New Dataflow Programming Language |
09/13/2010 | Despite that I don't really like Monads | principle of least authority and programming languages |
09/07/2010 | After reading Duffy, I wonder what we are discussing? | Is Transactional Programming Actually Easier? |
09/07/2010 | Disillusionment Part III | Joe Duffy: A (brief) retrospective on transactional memory |
09/01/2010 | I agree | Choosing a VM for a concurrent language |
09/02/2010 | A lot of Science is Art | Choosing a VM for a concurrent language |
09/03/2010 | Agreed, but CS is not Physics | Choosing a VM for a concurrent language |
09/03/2010 | Designing Ergonomically is Difficult, but Testing Isn't | Choosing a VM for a concurrent language |
09/05/2010 | A language is ... | Sapir-Whorf 70 years on |
12/20/2010 | Hard to believe he said that as a 17 year old! | Sapir-Whorf 70 years on |
08/27/2010 | Buy a few Books? | CS and mathematics dictionary |
08/25/2010 | Hey! | Articles on Precise GC with Parametric Polymorphism |
08/18/2010 | You need to know really well where you want your notes to go | Quick OT Doc Authoring/Equation Editting Question |
08/22/2010 | Recognizes Handwritten Math? | Quick OT Doc Authoring/Equation Editting Question |
08/17/2010 | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
08/19/2010 | No | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
08/19/2010 | Yeah, looks convenient | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
08/23/2010 | Uh? | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
08/23/2010 | The LHS may contain an | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
08/20/2010 | Noted | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
08/21/2010 | Just C/Speed | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
08/23/2010 | Guess it's more living with glitches | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
08/24/2010 | 70fps should be the default | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
08/23/2010 | A horse is a horse, of course | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
08/23/2010 | Numerical Exceptions | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
08/27/2010 | Good Points | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
08/23/2010 | Very Good | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
08/23/2010 | Sounds like a better explanation | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
08/23/2010 | By the way | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
11/29/2010 | Looking for Co-Developers? | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
11/29/2010 | Adding Ref? | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
11/29/2010 | Addendum | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
04/21/2011 | Open Source | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
04/22/2011 | Where to host? | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
04/22/2011 | Hmm... | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
04/22/2011 | Implementation Reference | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
04/24/2011 | Type Inferencing for the Hi Language | The Grafwegen Hi Compiler named Hic release 0.1 |
08/14/2010 | I just wonder | Miguel de Icaza on Java lawsuit |
08/15/2010 | Figures | Miguel de Icaza on Java lawsuit |
08/20/2010 | On Dalvik Internals | Miguel de Icaza on Java lawsuit |
08/20/2010 | I've tried to get my hand on bench-marks | Miguel de Icaza on Java lawsuit |
08/13/2010 | Module System != Namespace Management | The ideal style/system for namespaces. |
08/13/2010 | Module System <= Namespace Management | The ideal style/system for namespaces. |
08/13/2010 | How to speak Obamanese? | The ideal style/system for namespaces. |
08/13/2010 | --Wpedantic-errors | The ideal style/system for namespaces. |
08/13/2010 | Ah well | The ideal style/system for namespaces. |
08/16/2010 | I must be older than you are | The ideal style/system for namespaces. |
08/16/2010 | Strange | The ideal style/system for namespaces. |
08/16/2010 | Well, at least that mistake is cleared | The ideal style/system for namespaces. |
08/14/2010 | My Point | The ideal style/system for namespaces. |
08/14/2010 | That's what I wonder about | The ideal style/system for namespaces. |
08/18/2010 | I really wonder about the benefits of JITting | Type Classes as Objects and Implicits |
08/19/2010 | Okay... What about inline? | Type Classes as Objects and Implicits |
08/20/2010 | It's a generalized form of Fibonacci, No? | Type Classes as Objects and Implicits |
07/31/2010 | I think, this just shouldn't have type-checked: | Overlapping Instances + Functional Dependencies Unsound? |
08/01/2010 | Depends on your semantics | Overlapping Instances + Functional Dependencies Unsound? |
08/01/2010 | TBH, it's a lesson from my own Hi compiler. | Overlapping Instances + Functional Dependencies Unsound? |
08/07/2010 | I thought | Overlapping Instances + Functional Dependencies Unsound? |
08/08/2010 | uh. nope? or, uh, yes. | Overlapping Instances + Functional Dependencies Unsound? |
07/31/2010 | The Root of the Problem | Overlapping Instances + Functional Dependencies Unsound? |
07/16/2010 | Is an idea discovery or invention? | Is mathematics invention or discovery? |
07/16/2010 | Pi | Is mathematics invention or discovery? |
07/16/2010 | Of course | Is mathematics invention or discovery? |
07/13/2010 | Context Sensitive Grammars | Generative Grammar-based Computation |
07/13/2010 | Hmpf | Generative Grammar-based Computation |
07/13/2010 | Post by Z-Bo | Generative Grammar-based Computation |
07/13/2010 | Btw, Prolog | Generative Grammar-based Computation |
07/15/2010 | Try CDL3 | Generative Grammar-based Computation |
07/13/2010 | An awful argument | App Inventor: Programming for non-programmers... again |
07/13/2010 | The argument wasn't on this particular application | App Inventor: Programming for non-programmers... again |
07/16/2010 | Reads like Oscar Wilde | App Inventor: Programming for non-programmers... again |
07/09/2010 | Oleg says: | The Rust Language |
07/09/2010 | Hell no | The Rust Language |
07/11/2010 | The way I see it.. | The Rust Language |
07/21/2010 | Been There, Done That | The Rust Language |
07/06/2010 | Teaching is Lying | Uncle Bob's talk at RailsConf 2010 |
07/06/2010 | Moore excellent | Uncle Bob's talk at RailsConf 2010 |
07/06/2010 | Exsqueeze Me? | Uncle Bob's talk at RailsConf 2010 |
07/06/2010 | Google Watts | Uncle Bob's talk at RailsConf 2010 |
07/06/2010 | Yah, well | Uncle Bob's talk at RailsConf 2010 |
07/07/2010 | I doubt them both... | Uncle Bob's talk at RailsConf 2010 |
07/07/2010 | He makes you think | Uncle Bob's talk at RailsConf 2010 |
07/07/2010 | He said a lot more than just that... | Uncle Bob's talk at RailsConf 2010 |
07/03/2010 | I have been thinking about similar lines | An intuitionistic logic that proves Markov's principle |
07/03/2010 | Thanks for the clarification | An intuitionistic logic that proves Markov's principle |
07/02/2010 | I second this... | Simulation language ideas? |
06/30/2010 | Hey! | Evocative metaphor |
06/29/2010 | Interesting | Xtext: An IDE on the cheap |
07/01/2010 | Quelle Bordelle | SF-calculus |
07/07/2010 | Right | SF-calculus |
06/28/2010 | I don't get all these arguments | SF-calculus |
06/29/2010 | Still don't see it | SF-calculus |
07/01/2010 | Yeah | SF-calculus |
06/29/2010 | Nice | SF-calculus |
07/01/2010 | Someone should come up with a better term | SF-calculus |
07/01/2010 | Practical Application | SF-calculus |
07/02/2010 | I know that.. | SF-calculus |
06/27/2010 | Dictionaries and Contexts | How important is language support for namespace management? |
06/27/2010 | In order for a university to lead... | Why Undergraduates Should Learn the Principles of Programming Languages |
06/27/2010 | Whatever gave you that idea? | Why Undergraduates Should Learn the Principles of Programming Languages |
06/27/2010 | You just made it | Why Undergraduates Should Learn the Principles of Programming Languages |
06/28/2010 | If you would elaborate that further | Why Undergraduates Should Learn the Principles of Programming Languages |
06/28/2010 | I get that | Why Undergraduates Should Learn the Principles of Programming Languages |
06/29/2010 | Not Politics, human nature | Why Undergraduates Should Learn the Principles of Programming Languages |
06/30/2010 | Probably no discussion | Why Undergraduates Should Learn the Principles of Programming Languages |
06/30/2010 | Dijkstra's story is: I hire an expert. Expert says do X. I do Y. | Why Undergraduates Should Learn the Principles of Programming Languages |
06/30/2010 | Wrong Problem | Why Undergraduates Should Learn the Principles of Programming Languages |
06/30/2010 | Yeah, some underpinning | Why Undergraduates Should Learn the Principles of Programming Languages |
06/30/2010 | Was that a reply to me? | Why Undergraduates Should Learn the Principles of Programming Languages |
06/30/2010 | Dijkstra assumed... | Why Undergraduates Should Learn the Principles of Programming Languages |
06/27/2010 | Scanned, went to the Trash Can | Why Undergraduates Should Learn the Principles of Programming Languages |
07/01/2010 | Yeah, I think this discussion died | Why Undergraduates Should Learn the Principles of Programming Languages |
07/08/2010 | You're addressing the wrong crowd here... | Why Undergraduates Should Learn the Principles of Programming Languages |
07/15/2010 | I guess you're right | Why Undergraduates Should Learn the Principles of Programming Languages |
07/09/2010 | Don't think it is that bad, now is it? | Why Undergraduates Should Learn the Principles of Programming Languages |
07/10/2010 | Uh.. Well | Why Undergraduates Should Learn the Principles of Programming Languages |
07/11/2010 | Depends | Why Undergraduates Should Learn the Principles of Programming Languages |
06/18/2010 | Looking for a proof that eager reduction is as strong as lazy reduction | Looking for a proof that eager reduction is as strong as lazy reduction |
06/19/2010 | Thanks | Looking for a proof that eager reduction is as strong as lazy reduction |
06/19/2010 | Encodings | Looking for a proof that eager reduction is as strong as lazy reduction |
06/20/2010 | Okidoki | Looking for a proof that eager reduction is as strong as lazy reduction |
06/14/2010 | C-Machine | C-Machine |
06/14/2010 | True | C-Machine |
06/14/2010 | Yah. | C-Machine |
06/09/2010 | Mature? | SIGPLAN's first Programming Languages Software Award goes to LLVM |
05/09/2010 | You could have stated a simpler question. | Computing complexity |
05/07/2010 | Given the amount of subscribers | Spam filters |
05/08/2010 | Not a bad point | Code Quarterly - The Hackademic Journal |
05/05/2010 | ∀τ:τ→τ | Typed Lambda Calculus |
05/04/2010 | Wouldn't this be 2nd order too? | Typed Lambda Calculus |
05/04/2010 | Tresspassing and Theft | The Structure of Authority: Why security is not a separable concern |
04/21/2010 | ML is purrfect.... ML | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
04/21/2010 | Yah | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
04/22/2010 | Effect and State | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
04/22/2010 | My distaste | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
04/22/2010 | Stuff goes In, Stuff goes Out | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
04/22/2010 | Weaknesses and Problems | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
04/23/2010 | Pause and Effect | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
04/23/2010 | Propaganda Philippa | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
04/23/2010 | Halelujah, Hosanna and Haskell | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
04/24/2010 | In a religious debate, you bring tomatoes | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
04/24/2010 | Possibly | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
04/23/2010 | Prior to widespread adoption of OOP languages... | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
04/23/2010 | It's not the syntax only | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
04/22/2010 | Design and Tools | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
04/24/2010 | Why? | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
04/24/2010 | Obligatory Superfluous Comment | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
05/21/2010 | Logging | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
05/22/2010 | Language or Programming | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
05/22/2010 | You missed the point entirely | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
05/22/2010 | Explicit | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
05/23/2010 | Weaving | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
05/23/2010 | Referential Transparancy | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
05/23/2010 | Bull | Seeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages |
05/04/2010 | Yeah | SEC interested in formalising contracts ... in Python |
04/22/2010 | Soft Time | SEC interested in formalising contracts ... in Python |
04/25/2010 | Most Big Companies understand Theory and Academia Perfectly | SEC interested in formalising contracts ... in Python |
04/25/2010 | Irrelevant. Contracts are always in the domain of courts | SEC interested in formalising contracts ... in Python |
04/25/2010 | Is that relevant? | SEC interested in formalising contracts ... in Python |
04/24/2010 | A Pretty Uninformed Opinion | SEC interested in formalising contracts ... in Python |
04/24/2010 | Politics? | SEC interested in formalising contracts ... in Python |
04/25/2010 | The SEC issued that programs be written in the US | SEC interested in formalising contracts ... in Python |
04/26/2010 | 3% | SEC interested in formalising contracts ... in Python |
04/26/2010 | Requirements Engineering | SEC interested in formalising contracts ... in Python |
04/26/2010 | Much Different | SEC interested in formalising contracts ... in Python |
04/27/2010 | Hugs is written in C | SEC interested in formalising contracts ... in Python |
04/27/2010 | Who is Our? | SEC interested in formalising contracts ... in Python |
04/27/2010 | No goal and an agenda doesn't exists | SEC interested in formalising contracts ... in Python |
04/27/2010 | I did? | SEC interested in formalising contracts ... in Python |
04/28/2010 | As I got it | SEC interested in formalising contracts ... in Python |
04/29/2010 | Then explain to me | SEC interested in formalising contracts ... in Python |
04/30/2010 | Ah well | SEC interested in formalising contracts ... in Python |
04/28/2010 | Or it is elaborate sales? | SEC interested in formalising contracts ... in Python |
04/28/2010 | I agree | SEC interested in formalising contracts ... in Python |
06/23/2010 | The most common reason for bit rot | seL4: Formal Verification of an Operating-System Kernel |
04/16/2010 | If I read it well... it summarizes to: | How can C Programs be so Reliable? |
04/20/2010 | Component Failure | How can C Programs be so Reliable? |
04/21/2010 | Though I agree with you... | How can C Programs be so Reliable? |
04/21/2010 | Ah | How can C Programs be so Reliable? |
04/21/2010 | Maybe... | How can C Programs be so Reliable? |
04/21/2010 | Another Good Point | How can C Programs be so Reliable? |
04/21/2010 | No Faults, Design Decisions | How can C Programs be so Reliable? |
04/21/2010 | I agree | How can C Programs be so Reliable? |
04/22/2010 | Don't understand his trick.... | How can C Programs be so Reliable? |
04/22/2010 | The Trick Works | How can C Programs be so Reliable? |
04/22/2010 | Sets...Since... | How can C Programs be so Reliable? |
04/14/2010 | Don't | Ideas for a PL-oriented honors thesis |
04/14/2010 | Well... | Ideas for a PL-oriented honors thesis |
04/16/2010 | I know that.. | Ideas for a PL-oriented honors thesis |
04/16/2010 | I don't see your point? | Ideas for a PL-oriented honors thesis |
04/16/2010 | Those who teach, can't | Ideas for a PL-oriented honors thesis |
04/17/2010 | No Shifting | Ideas for a PL-oriented honors thesis |
04/14/2010 | I agree, but... | Ideas for a PL-oriented honors thesis |
04/16/2010 | Cool, thanks for that answer. | Ideas for a PL-oriented honors thesis |
04/14/2010 | Impossible question? | Representing Type Information in Dynamically Typed Languages |
04/14/2010 | Nit-picking | Representing Type Information in Dynamically Typed Languages |
04/15/2010 | I like that idea | Representing Type Information in Dynamically Typed Languages |
04/11/2010 | Battery | iPhone PL lockdown |
04/12/2010 | Good Point | iPhone PL lockdown |
04/14/2010 | Well, having scanned the link and your post | splitting the program into formalizable vs. non-formalizable parts? |
04/12/2010 | Pnueli, Milner | splitting the program into formalizable vs. non-formalizable parts? |
04/14/2010 | I think, it's was by now... | splitting the program into formalizable vs. non-formalizable parts? |
04/14/2010 | To Clarify | Specifying Solvers? |
04/11/2010 | unsafePerformIO != Imperative. Monad == Imperative. | Can functional programming be liberated from the von Neumann paradigm? |
04/12/2010 | i'll bite once again. | Can functional programming be liberated from the von Neumann paradigm? |
04/12/2010 | Don't assume too much... | Can functional programming be liberated from the von Neumann paradigm? |
04/13/2010 | Yeah | Can functional programming be liberated from the von Neumann paradigm? |
04/13/2010 | yeah well | Can functional programming be liberated from the von Neumann paradigm? |
04/14/2010 | Hmpf | Can functional programming be liberated from the von Neumann paradigm? |
04/14/2010 | As a side note... | Can functional programming be liberated from the von Neumann paradigm? |
05/12/2010 | Can someone explain | On the (Alleged) Value of Proof for Assurance |
05/08/2010 | As far as I understood | On the (Alleged) Value of Proof for Assurance |
06/17/2010 | More Guilty | On the (Alleged) Value of Proof for Assurance |
03/01/2010 | At some point... | Advantages of Purity |
02/24/2010 | class Set (S a)? | Objects to Unify Type Classes and GADTs |
02/24/2010 | I admit I didn't totally get that | Objects to Unify Type Classes and GADTs |
02/25/2010 | Right.. | Objects to Unify Type Classes and GADTs |
02/20/2010 | I second this! | Reminder: OOPSLA is now SPLASH |
02/18/2010 | Didn't you get the memo? | Small PL Thought Experiment |
02/18/2010 | Great, thanks! | Small PL Thought Experiment |
02/19/2010 | Great Feedback | Small PL Thought Experiment |
02/19/2010 | Cool, I got that under 12 seconds! | Small PL Thought Experiment |
02/20/2010 | Uh | Small PL Thought Experiment |
02/20/2010 | Well.... | Small PL Thought Experiment |
01/22/2010 | uh | see history of things i started (vs. commented on)? |
01/18/2010 | CS is a science | Declarative binding vs. composition |
01/14/2010 | I Like My Moon | Quantum Lambda Calculus |
01/16/2010 | I don't buy into quantum anymore | Quantum Lambda Calculus |
01/16/2010 | I shouldn't discuss this, but.. | Quantum Lambda Calculus |
01/17/2010 | Thanks for that comment | Quantum Lambda Calculus |
01/18/2010 | You ate my M&M? | Quantum Lambda Calculus |
01/18/2010 | Well Hey! | Quantum Lambda Calculus |
01/18/2010 | Yeah | Quantum Lambda Calculus |
01/17/2010 | Pre-understood pre-comment which should be widely disregarded. | Quantum Lambda Calculus |
01/17/2010 | Clouded Judgements | Quantum Lambda Calculus |
01/18/2010 | Don't know that dilemma | Quantum Lambda Calculus |
01/19/2010 | Is Not | Quantum Lambda Calculus |
01/19/2010 | Oh golly, dropping the M&Ms | Quantum Lambda Calculus |
01/19/2010 | Twister | Quantum Lambda Calculus |
01/20/2010 | Thomas: Then reread them yourself before you claim anything! | Quantum Lambda Calculus |
01/20/2010 | Ah well, okay. | Quantum Lambda Calculus |
01/20/2010 | Oh great, I am confused. | Quantum Lambda Calculus |
01/21/2010 | Duh | Quantum Lambda Calculus |
01/21/2010 | Btw | Quantum Lambda Calculus |
01/20/2010 | As far as I can see... | Quantum Lambda Calculus |
01/24/2010 | (forget it) | Quantum Lambda Calculus |
01/05/2010 | If I remember correctly | wondering why C is the language of compilers- when a Scheme subset would seem to be a better fit? |
12/30/2009 | I am trying this | most water-tight real-world language implementation? |
12/30/2009 | Non-determinism != Probabilistic | Is (probabilistic) non-determinism pure ? |
12/30/2009 | These are just definitions | Is (probabilistic) non-determinism pure ? |
12/25/2009 | Lazy Christmas Gift | Lazy Christmas Gift |
12/04/2009 | Goto Start | Why Object-Oriented Languages Need Tail Calls |
12/07/2009 | Two sides | Why Object-Oriented Languages Need Tail Calls |
12/07/2009 | Wrong | Why Object-Oriented Languages Need Tail Calls |
12/09/2009 | We Bad? | Why Object-Oriented Languages Need Tail Calls |
11/24/2009 | Comes with spots too | Scratch: Programming for All |
11/17/2009 | Overloading | I Seek a Reasonable Survey on the Concept of "Module System" |
11/12/2009 | Because it is easy | Compilation to C, a definitive guide? |
11/30/2009 | Remarks (overdue) | Review NP-complete Library Versioning Problem |
12/27/2009 | Naive approximation | Objects as Modules in Newspeak |
05/18/2009 | I find this... | Extension Methods versus Structural Typing of Traits for solving the expression problem |
05/16/2009 | HCI: Reactable | Computer music: a bastion of interactive visual dataflow languages |
05/21/2009 | Hmpf | WolframAlpha |
05/21/2009 | tanh(0.1x) | tanh(0.2x) | WolframAlpha |
05/21/2009 | Attribute Grammars (maybe on Finite Lattices) | WolframAlpha |
05/12/2009 | German | Why Did M.I.T. Switch from Scheme to Python? |
05/14/2009 | Mindset | Why Did M.I.T. Switch from Scheme to Python? |
05/17/2009 | Ah | Why Did M.I.T. Switch from Scheme to Python? |
05/17/2009 | To come back to your question | Why Did M.I.T. Switch from Scheme to Python? |
12/13/2010 | Just a Double Reply | Oracle, Sun, and Fortress |
05/06/2009 | Karel the Robot | Right on! |
05/07/2009 | Don't forget the Greeks | Right on! |
05/07/2009 | I will | Right on! |
05/07/2009 | Though the bad thing about mathematical formalisms | Right on! |
05/07/2009 | More seriously | Right on! |
05/07/2009 | Works well | Right on! |
05/07/2009 | Hardyhar... | Right on! |
05/07/2009 | Ha! | Right on! |
05/08/2009 | Solid at times | Right on! |
05/08/2009 | More concrete | Right on! |
05/07/2009 | Or stepping off? | Right on! |
05/07/2009 | Jot | Right on! |
05/08/2009 | Daydreaming | Right on! |
05/04/2009 | Spam, Akismet, Captcha | dealing with spam? |
04/27/2009 | Recondite arguments | Branching Time vs. Linear Time: Semantical Perspective |
04/27/2009 | Starting to see the argument | Branching Time vs. Linear Time: Semantical Perspective |
04/29/2009 | Buy Lynch? | Branching Time vs. Linear Time: Semantical Perspective |
05/01/2009 | Enabledness | Branching Time vs. Linear Time: Semantical Perspective |
05/02/2009 | IO automata vs CSP | Branching Time vs. Linear Time: Semantical Perspective |
04/29/2009 | Uh, so what? | Branching Time vs. Linear Time: Semantical Perspective |
04/23/2009 | Shield | The deBrujin Criterion and the "LCF Approach". |
04/25/2009 | Substitution | The deBrujin Criterion and the "LCF Approach". |
04/29/2009 | Ah... | The deBrujin Criterion and the "LCF Approach". |
04/13/2009 | Hmpf | Why are objects so unintuitive? |
04/17/2009 | For me | Why are objects so unintuitive? |
11/19/2010 | According to OOAD | Why are objects so unintuitive? |
04/07/2009 | Not even that bad an idea | A Computer-Generated Proof that P=NP |
03/13/2009 | Obligatory Comment | Advantages of pointfree? |
03/14/2009 | I agree | Advantages of pointfree? |
03/16/2009 | Stateless? | Advantages of pointfree? |
03/13/2009 | Algebraic Optimizations | Advantages of pointfree? |
03/14/2009 | Map Fusion | Advantages of pointfree? |
03/15/2009 | Neither am I | Advantages of pointfree? |
03/16/2009 | Extra Comment | Advantages of pointfree? |
03/16/2009 | Most common denominator | Advantages of pointfree? |
03/16/2009 | Setting aside all the usual | Influence of cognitive models on programming language design |
03/16/2009 | You do understand | Influence of cognitive models on programming language design |
03/16/2009 | Love the Semantic Domain Models | Influence of cognitive models on programming language design |
03/10/2009 | I think... | Linear Logic and Permutation Stacks--The Forth Shall Be First |
03/11/2009 | No | Linear Logic and Permutation Stacks--The Forth Shall Be First |
03/11/2009 | ? | Linear Logic and Permutation Stacks--The Forth Shall Be First |
03/11/2009 | Ah well | Linear Logic and Permutation Stacks--The Forth Shall Be First |
03/12/2009 | Not much | Linear Logic and Permutation Stacks--The Forth Shall Be First |
03/13/2009 | Stack-based by Nature | Linear Logic and Permutation Stacks--The Forth Shall Be First |
03/08/2009 | Why didn't it work out? | Linear Logic and Permutation Stacks--The Forth Shall Be First |
03/08/2009 | It works well in Clean | Linear Logic and Permutation Stacks--The Forth Shall Be First |
03/05/2009 | A Silly Idea | The Meta-LtU Thread |
03/04/2009 | Dikes! | The Meta-LtU Thread |
03/06/2009 | Looking for the the Mouse | The Meta-LtU Thread |
03/06/2009 | I take that as a no | The Meta-LtU Thread |
03/10/2009 | ... | The Meta-LtU Thread |
03/06/2009 | Some Incoherent Random Thoughts | The Meta-LtU Thread |
03/07/2009 | Water under the Bridge | The Meta-LtU Thread |
03/07/2009 | Probably too early | The Meta-LtU Thread |
03/08/2009 | You got the gist | The Meta-LtU Thread |
03/08/2009 | E7-E5 | The Meta-LtU Thread |
03/08/2009 | It could become a Christmas Tree | The Meta-LtU Thread |
02/02/2009 | Small remark | Ruling out nonsensical data type definitions |
02/02/2009 | Why would you reject it? | Ruling out nonsensical data type definitions |
02/02/2009 | Well-foundedness | Ruling out nonsensical data type definitions |
01/29/2009 | Semiotics | PL Grand Challenges |
02/01/2009 | That's easy | PL Grand Challenges |
02/02/2009 | Ok, ok | PL Grand Challenges |
02/03/2009 | Not entirely what I meant | PL Grand Challenges |
02/06/2009 | Boyish Enthusiasm | PL Grand Challenges |
02/06/2009 | Do you mean five apples | PL Grand Challenges |
02/06/2009 | Apples and Oranges | PL Grand Challenges |
02/07/2009 | Whatever | PL Grand Challenges |
02/09/2009 | Need not be that complex | PL Grand Challenges |
02/06/2009 | Psychology and CS | PL Grand Challenges |
02/06/2009 | If there haven't been a lot of studies | PL Grand Challenges |
02/07/2009 | . | PL Grand Challenges |
02/09/2009 | Lala-land ain't that bad | PL Grand Challenges |
02/09/2009 | And neurolinguistics is the | PL Grand Challenges |
02/09/2009 | Understanding why we should obtain | PL Grand Challenges |
02/09/2009 | Multi-disciplinary development | PL Grand Challenges |
02/10/2009 | Maybe a little better than semicolons | PL Grand Challenges |
01/25/2009 | Don't change a winning team | Detailed discussion forum and/or IRC channel? |
01/26/2009 | Sister-site | Detailed discussion forum and/or IRC channel? |
01/24/2009 | Ascribing Machine-LIke Qualities to Man | Elephant 2000: A Programming Language for the year 2015 Based on Speech Acts |
01/25/2009 | My comment on Spinoza | Elephant 2000: A Programming Language for the year 2015 Based on Speech Acts |
01/19/2009 | Read it as a postfix function/operator | Lambda Calculus Notation |
01/20/2009 | Not sure? | Compilation/method resolution with structural subtyping |
01/16/2009 | Did you... | Looking for papers describing advanced language topics in terms of C programming |
01/14/2009 | If it is solved... | What Are The Resolved Debates in General Purpose Language Design? |
01/14/2009 | R5RS and R6RS Scheme | What Are The Resolved Debates in General Purpose Language Design? |
01/14/2009 | Hmpf | What Are The Resolved Debates in General Purpose Language Design? |
01/21/2009 | As far as I know | What Are The Resolved Debates in General Purpose Language Design? |
01/21/2009 | Yeah, what would you do with it anyway... | What Are The Resolved Debates in General Purpose Language Design? |
01/24/2009 | Lexical level is part of the grammar | What Are The Resolved Debates in General Purpose Language Design? |
01/10/2009 | Using coalgebraic structures for traversing ADTs lazily | Using coalgebraic structures for traversing ADTs lazily |
01/11/2009 | Comparing content | Using coalgebraic structures for traversing ADTs lazily |
01/11/2009 | More programming/solution oriented | Using coalgebraic structures for traversing ADTs lazily |
01/14/2009 | Yeah | Using coalgebraic structures for traversing ADTs lazily |
03/01/2009 | Familiar | Using coalgebraic structures for traversing ADTs lazily |
03/01/2009 | Same solution? | Using coalgebraic structures for traversing ADTs lazily |
03/04/2009 | Solution | Using coalgebraic structures for traversing ADTs lazily |
03/04/2009 | In the eye of the beholder? | Using coalgebraic structures for traversing ADTs lazily |
03/04/2009 | Evaluate by Need | Using coalgebraic structures for traversing ADTs lazily |
03/05/2009 | Thanks | Using coalgebraic structures for traversing ADTs lazily |
03/06/2009 | Nope | Using coalgebraic structures for traversing ADTs lazily |
03/06/2009 | God, now I am interested | Using coalgebraic structures for traversing ADTs lazily |
03/06/2009 | Wrapping it up: Samefringe Problem | Using coalgebraic structures for traversing ADTs lazily |
03/06/2009 | Master Theorem | Using coalgebraic structures for traversing ADTs lazily |
03/06/2009 | Yeah, saw that | Using coalgebraic structures for traversing ADTs lazily |
01/01/2009 | Depends | "Determinism" of types? |
12/28/2008 | Hmmm.... | Learning Pragmatics of Implementing a "Modern" Type Systems |
12/31/2008 | Use your head | Learning Pragmatics of Implementing a "Modern" Type Systems |
01/09/2009 | O(size of the term) | 2008 In Review - What Happened with Programming Languages? |
01/12/2009 | Sidenote on Boehm | 2008 In Review - What Happened with Programming Languages? |
01/28/2009 | Ok | 2008 In Review - What Happened with Programming Languages? |
01/09/2009 | SKI | 2008 In Review - What Happened with Programming Languages? |
01/13/2009 | On die memory | 2008 In Review - What Happened with Programming Languages? |
12/23/2008 | Exhaustiveness checking | Functional Pearl: Type-safe pattern combinators |
12/20/2008 | I think... | Any problems with true union types if all values are tagged? (like in a dynamically typed system, Lisp, etc.) |
12/20/2008 | Aaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaah! | Any problems with true union types if all values are tagged? (like in a dynamically typed system, Lisp, etc.) |
12/31/2008 | re: Better Algorithm Complexity | Programmable Concurrency in a Pure and Lazy Language |
12/31/2008 | On better algorithm complexity | Programmable Concurrency in a Pure and Lazy Language |
12/31/2008 | Irrelevant | Programmable Concurrency in a Pure and Lazy Language |
12/20/2008 | Yeah, well | Fundamental Flaws in Current Programming Language Type Systems |
12/20/2008 | Power is not absolute | Fundamental Flaws in Current Programming Language Type Systems |
12/20/2008 | Types as values | Fundamental Flaws in Current Programming Language Type Systems |
12/20/2008 | Requirements & Design | Fundamental Flaws in Current Programming Language Type Systems |
12/20/2008 | No real thoughts | Fundamental Flaws in Current Programming Language Type Systems |
12/11/2008 | In one word... | The Genuine Sieve of Eratosthenes |
12/23/2008 | Someone ... | The Genuine Sieve of Eratosthenes |
12/23/2008 | Maybe | The Genuine Sieve of Eratosthenes |
01/04/2009 | Great analysis | The Genuine Sieve of Eratosthenes |
01/04/2009 | O(n)? Another argument? | The Genuine Sieve of Eratosthenes |
01/04/2009 | I think the sequence | The Genuine Sieve of Eratosthenes |
01/05/2009 | I might be stupid | The Genuine Sieve of Eratosthenes |
01/05/2009 | How silly of me | The Genuine Sieve of Eratosthenes |
01/05/2009 | Hehe | The Genuine Sieve of Eratosthenes |
01/05/2009 | Guess so | The Genuine Sieve of Eratosthenes |
12/09/2008 | Four Color Theorem | AMS: A Special Issue on Formal Proof |
11/24/2008 | Non-standard type theories for FP | Non-standard type theories for FP |
11/24/2008 | Same for existentials | Non-standard type theories for FP |
11/24/2008 | You gave the answer I wanted to avoid | Non-standard type theories for FP |
11/24/2008 | Elaborate | Non-standard type theories for FP |
12/31/2008 | I understood that | Non-standard type theories for FP |
01/01/2009 | Yeah | Non-standard type theories for FP |
11/24/2008 | Wouldn't you like a type system where illegal types do not exist | Non-standard type theories for FP |
11/24/2008 | Skipped a part | Non-standard type theories for FP |
11/24/2008 | Let's try \t \x . t x | Non-standard type theories for FP |
11/25/2008 | So was I, at a lost island ;-) | Non-standard type theories for FP |
11/24/2008 | Needed to ride my bike... | Non-standard type theories for FP |
11/24/2008 | Binding | Non-standard type theories for FP |
11/24/2008 | Maybe I am just thinking parametric polymorphism | Non-standard type theories for FP |
11/24/2008 | Unsure | Non-standard type theories for FP |
11/24/2008 | I know | Non-standard type theories for FP |
11/27/2008 | Argument by Pierce? | Non-standard type theories for FP |
11/25/2008 | Ha! | Non-standard type theories for FP |
11/25/2008 | I just realized that | Non-standard type theories for FP |
11/25/2008 | Back to the original question - and let's drop it | Non-standard type theories for FP |
11/27/2008 | It's just a silly observation. A metafor and maybe a solution? | Non-standard type theories for FP |
11/27/2008 | I didn't really answer to your remarks. | Non-standard type theories for FP |
01/25/2009 | Only implications | Non-standard type theories for FP |
12/01/2008 | I think I already got it to work | Non-standard type theories for FP |
12/03/2008 | Going higher-rank | Non-standard type theories for FP |
12/09/2008 | HMF, HML | Non-standard type theories for FP |
12/16/2008 | Skolem Types | Non-standard type theories for FP |
12/16/2008 | Great | Non-standard type theories for FP |
12/31/2008 | Not rank-2 | Non-standard type theories for FP |
11/20/2008 | Moveable code, multi-core | Current "hot" topics in parallel programming? |
11/19/2008 | Small stuff | SEP entry on Combinatory Logic |
11/11/2008 | I think your assumption is wrong, or I don't get the question? | Subtyping + overloading |
11/11/2008 | You answered your own question | Subtyping + overloading |
11/12/2008 | Weird | Subtyping + overloading |
11/12/2008 | I got that | Subtyping + overloading |
11/14/2008 | Yeah, I find it weird. | Subtyping + overloading |
11/14/2008 | True | Subtyping + overloading |
11/14/2008 | Good, but what about sharing then? | Subtyping + overloading |
11/14/2008 | Even more Voodoo | Subtyping + overloading |
11/14/2008 | Hallelujah, I think I get it. Unfortunately | Subtyping + overloading |
11/14/2008 | Duh | Subtyping + overloading |
11/14/2008 | Ouch | Subtyping + overloading |
11/17/2008 | Clearly, ... | Subtyping + overloading |
11/17/2008 | Again | Subtyping + overloading |
11/17/2008 | ... Oh, no. I was right ... ;-) ;-) | Subtyping + overloading |
11/17/2008 | Ok | Subtyping + overloading |
11/17/2008 | Ok | Subtyping + overloading |
11/19/2008 | Hmmm | Subtyping + overloading |
11/19/2008 | You're right - we're going way OT | Subtyping + overloading |
11/20/2008 | Brain Damage | Subtyping + overloading |
11/23/2008 | Look at the options | Subtyping + overloading |
11/23/2008 | Yeah well, we were talking intuition | Subtyping + overloading |
11/24/2008 | Semantics | Subtyping + overloading |
11/24/2008 | Too much machinery | Subtyping + overloading |
11/24/2008 | Great book, where's my towel ;-) | Subtyping + overloading |
11/14/2008 | Still some subtyping going on | Subtyping + overloading |
11/12/2008 | The implementation for | The Origins of the BitC Programming Language |
11/04/2008 | BDDs | New Programming Language Idea |
11/04/2008 | Impossible | New Programming Language Idea |
11/04/2008 | Nope | New Programming Language Idea |
11/05/2008 | Planning? Constraint Propagation | New Programming Language Idea |
11/05/2008 | Even selecting a function... | New Programming Language Idea |
11/06/2008 | Me bad | New Programming Language Idea |
11/06/2008 | Yeah | New Programming Language Idea |
11/01/2008 | Doubt it | Total functional language self interpreter? |
11/04/2008 | Nono | Total functional language self interpreter? |
11/01/2008 | Problems reading his post | Total functional language self interpreter? |
11/06/2008 | Uh, proof by contradiction | Total functional language self interpreter? |
11/06/2008 | ... (and ...) | Total functional language self interpreter? |
11/06/2008 | Misread your post | Total functional language self interpreter? |
11/06/2008 | Nitpicking your statements | Total functional language self interpreter? |
11/06/2008 | Bull | Total functional language self interpreter? |
11/07/2008 | Question | Total functional language self interpreter? |
10/31/2008 | Uh | Implementations of untyped lazy lambda calculus |
11/14/2008 | Sorry, I forgot | Implementations of untyped lazy lambda calculus |
10/27/2008 | Elaborate | BEE3: Putting the Buzz Back into Computer Architecture |
10/28/2008 | Yeah, but what is the result? | Fω^C: a symmetrically classical variant of System Fω |
10/23/2008 | A perfect moment of clarity? | Multiple Dispatch in Practice |
10/22/2008 | As far as I understand it | Constructor classes |
10/23/2008 | Hmm | Constructor classes |
10/09/2008 | Gimple/Generic | DSL or dialects used inside compilers |
10/06/2008 | No | Clojure talk videos |
10/06/2008 | Ah | Clojure talk videos |
10/08/2008 | Pure stuff | Clojure talk videos |
10/09/2008 | Yeah | Clojure talk videos |
10/01/2008 | To answer your question | Lazy Graph Reduction and abstract machines |
10/02/2008 | 6 Secret Rules | Lazy Graph Reduction and abstract machines |
09/29/2008 | To CPS or not to CPS | To CPS or not to CPS |
09/29/2008 | I scanned it. | To CPS or not to CPS |
10/02/2008 | Read it | To CPS or not to CPS |
09/30/2008 | What about this solution? Reverse Polish Notation. PLEASE SHOOT! | To CPS or not to CPS |
09/30/2008 | Extra example for fac | To CPS or not to CPS |
09/30/2008 | Going for it. | To CPS or not to CPS |
10/01/2008 | Talking to myself. It's a bloody good idea | To CPS or not to CPS |
10/03/2008 | Reflections | To CPS or not to CPS |
10/07/2008 | End Result - slow, or damned slow | To CPS or not to CPS |
10/07/2008 | *Cough* - output when evaluating the AST directly | To CPS or not to CPS |
09/30/2008 | You are right | To CPS or not to CPS |
09/30/2008 | Got it | To CPS or not to CPS |
09/30/2008 | And also | To CPS or not to CPS |
09/29/2008 | Value Restriction - don't look at it. | Help with N-Ary functions? |
09/29/2008 | Do not understand... | Help with N-Ary functions? |
09/24/2008 | Ask Oleg | Security in FP |
09/23/2008 | Specializing values in a functional language | Specializing values in a functional language |
09/23/2008 | Thanks | Specializing values in a functional language |
09/24/2008 | Why is not a primitive of the language? | Specializing values in a functional language |
09/24/2008 | Doesn't break subtyping | Specializing values in a functional language |
09/22/2008 | Guessing | A graph puzzle |
09/21/2008 | Best way to interface with C/C++? | Best way to interface with C/C++? |
09/22/2008 | Thanks | Best way to interface with C/C++? |
09/27/2008 | Less posts since... | Narrowing field of languages? |
09/26/2008 | Can you provide your data? | Narrowing field of languages? |
09/22/2008 | Paper | Simon Peyton Jones Interview |
09/24/2008 | Exsqueeze me??? | Simon Peyton Jones Interview |
09/25/2008 | No provocation intended | Simon Peyton Jones Interview |
09/22/2008 | The succes of Haskell | Simon Peyton Jones Interview |
09/23/2008 | Generic Haskell and Template Meta Programming | Genericity over tuples |
09/24/2008 | Cool | Publishing negative results: single-assignment Lisp |
10/03/2008 | Seems good | Publishing negative results: single-assignment Lisp |
10/05/2008 | Well... | Publishing negative results: single-assignment Lisp |
10/07/2008 | Lock Free Garbage Collection | Publishing negative results: single-assignment Lisp |
10/31/2010 | I agree | Beyond FRP: physics-inspired programming abstractions? |
11/01/2010 | Baffles me too | Beyond FRP: physics-inspired programming abstractions? |
03/16/2009 | Off-topic | Beyond FRP: physics-inspired programming abstractions? |
03/16/2009 | A more concrete post? | Beyond FRP: physics-inspired programming abstractions? |
12/17/2010 | Enzo Ferrari | program verification: the very idea |
10/08/2008 | The Fall and Rise of FP | 10 Years of Purely Functional Data Structures |
10/08/2008 | Flattening Combinators: Surviving Without Parentheses | 10 Years of Purely Functional Data Structures |
10/30/2007 | CH? Fsck! | On the Importance of Purity |
10/16/2007 | Keep it technical, please ;-) | Examples of large-scale functional language projects |
09/13/2007 | Exactly, just an axiom | Question about the Monad associativity law |
05/08/2010 | Informal | Social Processes and Proofs of Theorems and Programs |
05/09/2010 | No idea where they're at now | Social Processes and Proofs of Theorems and Programs |
02/15/2007 | How to teach Functional Programming... in Flash??? | How to teach Functional Programming... in Flash??? |
02/16/2007 | Great | How to teach Functional Programming... in Flash??? |
07/12/2006 | WOT | Socially Responsive, Environmentally Friendly Logic |
02/14/2009 | Mod parent up | LtU: blog not forum! |
01/16/2007 | Yeah, dataflow.. | Why Are ALL Programming Languages So Low Level? |
03/19/2006 | [OT] There goes my wallpaper | Programming: 50, 100 years from now |
02/25/2006 | Compile- or run-time monomorphisation, semantical differences? | Signature Based Polymorphism, Structural Subtyping and Duck Typing |
03/02/2006 | Dictionaries | Signature Based Polymorphism, Structural Subtyping and Duck Typing |
12/14/2010 | Guido is very driven by the user | Guido: Language Design Is Not Just Solving Puzzles |
12/14/2010 | What is Useful? | Guido: Language Design Is Not Just Solving Puzzles |
12/14/2010 | Same is true for the current 'Yacc is Death' discussion | Guido: Language Design Is Not Just Solving Puzzles |
12/14/2010 | Yah, I'll admit it | Guido: Language Design Is Not Just Solving Puzzles |
12/15/2010 | Of course, I want it to be | Guido: Language Design Is Not Just Solving Puzzles |
04/15/2010 | Can't... Resist... | Combinators for contracts |
12/30/2009 | Some languages solve all problems | The Next Mainstream Programming Languages |
01/02/2010 | Wasn't | The Next Mainstream Programming Languages |
01/22/2006 | Choice of OS of LtU readers | Choice of OS of LtU readers |
01/22/2006 | Exactly! | Lisp is sin |
11/29/2005 | /Me agrees, my incomplete list | The building of robust software |
11/30/2005 | Strong typing | The building of robust software |
11/20/2005 | Junkspace! | Ruby the Rival |
11/18/2005 | Loved the e-pig site! | What good is Strong Normalization in Programming Languages? |
11/15/2005 | Qualified Types for MLF | Extensible Records With Scoped Labels |
11/17/2005 | Hmmm..... | Extensible Records With Scoped Labels |
11/14/2005 | Finite Sets | Algebra Of Programming (Bird, De Moor) |
11/14/2005 | Great! | OCaml 3.0.9 |
10/27/2005 | Ha! | Just What is it that Makes Martin-Lof's Type Theory so Different, so Appealing? |
10/27/2005 | ;-) | Just What is it that Makes Martin-Lof's Type Theory so Different, so Appealing? |
10/27/2005 | Hmm... | Would LISP/FP help here? |
10/25/2005 | Big if | Why Lists? |
10/26/2005 | More explicit | Why Lists? |
10/27/2005 | I know, but problem or design choice? | Why Lists? |
10/25/2005 | Problem vs Design Space | Why Lists? |
10/25/2005 | Expressiveness | What do you mean by studying "programming languages"? |
10/18/2005 | Maps | Best default sequence? |
10/17/2005 | True, but ... | Object Oriented Programming + Referential Transparency |
10/10/2005 | No, no, no! It's a lambda... | The Church-Turing Thesis: Breaking the Myth |
10/10/2005 | [OT] Feasibility of Quantum Computing? | The Church-Turing Thesis: Breaking the Myth |
10/05/2005 | Hello, John | Interesting old promotional video for Intentional Programming |
10/05/2005 | Moved | LtU etiquette |
10/05/2005 | [OT] Ah well | LtU etiquette |
10/05/2005 | Nice, but, | Propositional Satisfiability and Constraint Programming: A comparative Survey |
09/16/2005 | Whoops! | Most Productive FP Lang? |
09/16/2005 | Meritocracy, Gerontocracy, Technocracy or Kleptocracy? | Most Productive FP Lang? |
09/17/2005 | Atriplex | Most Productive FP Lang? |
09/16/2005 | Rooter: Methodology for the Typical Unification of Access Points | Most Productive FP Lang? |
09/16/2005 | "***, 100 µg, i.m." | Most Productive FP Lang? |
09/16/2005 | VB! Huh? | Most Productive FP Lang? |
09/17/2005 | Nice language! | Most Productive FP Lang? |
09/20/2005 | Duh... | Most Productive FP Lang? |
09/20/2005 | Duh. | Most Productive FP Lang? |
09/20/2005 | Seems like a good idea | Most Productive FP Lang? |
09/20/2005 | Implication Graphs | Most Productive FP Lang? |
09/16/2005 | Lack of Scheduling Information | Visual Basic 9 Interview on DDJ |
09/13/2005 | Nitpicking | Haskell and creative freedom |
09/09/2005 | Yeah, but... | Haskell and creative freedom |
09/09/2005 | Oh wait! I might... | Haskell and creative freedom |
09/10/2005 | Proof it. | Haskell and creative freedom |
09/09/2005 | Nomadic Wisdom | Persistent functional databases |
09/10/2005 | Not convinced... | Persistent functional databases |
09/13/2005 | Trade-off | Guido van Rossum: Building an Open Source Project and Community |
09/05/2005 | Uhm, laugh... | Jon Udell: The riddle of asynchrony |
09/02/2005 | Great PL with an archaic syntax | Yearning for a practical scheme |
10/05/2005 | [Moved] | Yearning for a practical scheme |
08/23/2005 | Nice Technique | Functional anti-memoization |
08/24/2005 | Evaluation Strategy of a GRS? | Functional anti-memoization |
01/26/2009 | Programmer's Choice | Functional anti-memoization |
08/21/2005 | Lucidity: clearness of thought or style | Formal semantics for working programmers |
08/23/2005 | Look up some Haskell papers on it | Neko 1.0 |
08/23/2005 | You don't say | Neko 1.0 |
08/19/2005 | Calculations - Poor Man's Monad | Large imperative code --> functional |
08/20/2005 | Ehud is on Holidays | 'Information and Computation' Open Access |
08/20/2005 | Nature is an example infested with lice | 'Information and Computation' Open Access |
07/11/2005 | Like it too | Static Typing Where Possible, Dynamic Typing When Needed |
07/12/2005 | Zero Kelvin Systems | Static Typing Where Possible, Dynamic Typing When Needed |
08/19/2005 | Baruch Spinoza | Static Typing Where Possible, Dynamic Typing When Needed |
07/09/2005 | From DeepChip | ESL Design |
07/10/2005 | Physics | ESL Design |
07/10/2005 | It's a compliment | ESL Design |
07/08/2005 | An honest answer (I hope) | Parrot 0.2.2 Released |
07/08/2005 | Monads? Again? | Parrot 0.2.2 Released |
06/30/2005 | Ook? | Ook? |
07/01/2005 | Don't think so | Ook? |
07/01/2005 | I stand corrected | Ook? |
06/30/2005 | Martin Fowler on Language Workbenches and DSLs | Martin Fowler on Language Workbenches and DSLs |
07/01/2005 | Cool | Martin Fowler on Language Workbenches and DSLs |
07/04/2005 | Great | Martin Fowler on Language Workbenches and DSLs |
07/04/2005 | Ambiguous about it too | Martin Fowler on Language Workbenches and DSLs |
07/08/2005 | Such blatantly informal arguments! ;-) | Martin Fowler on Language Workbenches and DSLs |
07/08/2005 | Thus? | Martin Fowler on Language Workbenches and DSLs |
07/10/2005 | Yeah | Martin Fowler on Language Workbenches and DSLs |
07/08/2005 | Noise | Martin Fowler on Language Workbenches and DSLs |
07/04/2005 | Phew | "typed" files OR xml OR meta information for delim. files. |
06/30/2005 | Same here | Organizing papers... |
06/30/2005 | Bad practice | Hungarian Notation vs The Right Thing |
06/30/2005 | JMOEFFTD | Hungarian Notation vs The Right Thing |
06/30/2005 | Seems to me that tools are there | Hungarian Notation vs The Right Thing |
06/30/2005 | I don't know | Hungarian Notation vs The Right Thing |
06/28/2005 | Dyna: a weighted dynamic logic programming language | Dyna: a weighted dynamic logic programming language |
06/30/2005 | OCaml vs OHaskell | Generics are a mistake? |
06/27/2005 | Elaborate | "dynamic" generative programming? |
06/24/2005 | Compile time guarantees | Static Types vs. Partially Evaluated Latent Types |
06/23/2005 | Personalizing LtU | How To Read a Paper |
06/23/2005 | Half-heartedly agree | Embedded Languages in Java |
06/20/2005 | Trees and Graphs | Tim Bray: On Threads |
06/13/2005 | CSP solutions? | Sudoku |
06/13/2005 | Hmmm.... | Sudoku |
06/14/2005 | Ah | Sudoku |
06/11/2005 | Hehe | Multilinguals learning computer languages faster than monol. |
06/11/2005 | Too early to tell... | Links Demos |
06/11/2005 | Base64 | Links Demos |
06/25/2005 | Hey! | Links Demos |
06/25/2005 | What about ten years from now? | Links Demos |
06/10/2005 | Short Term or Long Term? | Connecting The Dots |
06/10/2005 | The World Is Flat | Connecting The Dots |
06/13/2005 | Reading... | Connecting The Dots |
06/10/2005 | Patterns | Connecting The Dots |
06/13/2005 | Ajax, Barcelona, Cruyff | Connecting The Dots |
03/07/2009 | Consider Yourself Lucky | From shift and reset to polarized linear logic |
03/10/2009 | I think | From shift and reset to polarized linear logic |
06/03/2005 | Historical context | Variables as Channels |
06/03/2005 | Setting flame to a bucket | Basic(er) Simple(r) Type Theory(?) |
06/04/2005 | Ditto | Today's Status of Functional Programming Languages for Verification Tools ? |
05/30/2005 | Dude, you are blocking my sun | What is so bad about compiling? |
06/01/2005 | Sorry... But... | Judy Stores |
06/04/2005 | 256-ary Morphing Digital Tree | Judy Stores |
06/11/2005 | Some foolishness | Pure bigraphs: structure and dynamics (by Robin Milner) |
05/30/2005 | Pure vs Impure Lisp | Short examples of complex use of state? |
05/31/2005 | Ouch again | Short examples of complex use of state? |
06/01/2005 | Ah, Ok | Short examples of complex use of state? |
05/26/2005 | Hairy details | Generics: The Importance of Wildcards |
05/27/2005 | Type deducible from call stack... | Generics: The Importance of Wildcards |
05/28/2005 | Makes more sense | Generics: The Importance of Wildcards |
05/28/2005 | Ouch - generalization | Generics: The Importance of Wildcards |
05/28/2005 | Hmpf | Generics: The Importance of Wildcards |
05/24/2005 | Purity | Haskell for C Programmers |
05/24/2005 | Yeah | Haskell for C Programmers |
05/24/2005 | State of the world | Haskell for C Programmers |
05/24/2005 | Or not defendable? | Haskell for C Programmers |
05/24/2005 | The only fence against the world is a thorough knowledge of it | Haskell for C Programmers |
05/26/2005 | Platonic Solids | Haskell for C Programmers |
05/25/2005 | The naked purity | Haskell for C Programmers |
05/26/2005 | They sacrificed unto devils, not to God | Haskell for C Programmers |
05/23/2005 | What is testing? | Parameterized Unit Tests |
05/25/2005 | Sanity Check | Parameterized Unit Tests |
05/22/2005 | PyPy thunk module | First public release of PyPy |
05/20/2005 | It isn't, this one is | Tail recursion |
05/17/2005 | Cyc Knowledge Server | Cyc Knowledge Server |
05/18/2005 | Googlisms | Cyc Knowledge Server |
07/04/2005 | That and Collatz | Why Dependent Types Matter |
05/12/2005 | The dance is a poem of which each movement is a world | subtext: Uncovering the simplicity of programming |
05/08/2005 | Short answer... | Best route for new language to be self-hosting |
05/19/2005 | Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse | Best route for new language to be self-hosting |
05/08/2005 | Herakleitos vs Parmenides | From Perl Monks: "pissed off about functional programming" |
05/08/2005 | ¬(This = a mathematical expression) | From Perl Monks: "pissed off about functional programming" |
05/08/2005 | I am the measure of all things | From Perl Monks: "pissed off about functional programming" |
04/27/2005 | 31 bits | Virtual Machine and Runtime Framework |
04/28/2005 | Living in a box | Virtual Machine and Runtime Framework |
06/09/2005 | Informal summary | Why do they program in C++? |
06/09/2005 | Wrong summary | Why do they program in C++? |
06/09/2005 | Well... | Why do they program in C++? |
04/25/2005 | Seems we all ride the hump these days | Why do they program in C++? |
04/25/2005 | Often | Why do they program in C++? |
04/27/2005 | Wine and Women | Why do they program in C++? |
05/13/2005 | The game is trivial, but the game is untrivially played trivial | Why do they program in C++? |
05/13/2005 | Look, the ball minimally has to go between those two poles | Why do they program in C++? |
04/26/2005 | Perhaps they should care (2) | Computer generates verifiable mathematics proof |
04/27/2005 | Uhuh | Computer generates verifiable mathematics proof |
04/25/2005 | Computer generates verifiable mathematics proof | Computer generates verifiable mathematics proof |
04/20/2005 | Nice article + random thoughts | Relating FFTW and Split-Radix |
04/25/2005 | Great | Relating FFTW and Split-Radix |
05/12/2005 | Combinatorial Reasoning Systems? | Relating FFTW and Split-Radix |
05/14/2005 | I disagree until I made my decision. Then I agree. | Relating FFTW and Split-Radix |
04/20/2005 | Got a hammer but lost my nail | On the Unusual Effectiveness of Logic in Computer Science |
04/21/2005 | Ah well, bad hair day | On the Unusual Effectiveness of Logic in Computer Science |
04/21/2005 | Mochito! | On the Unusual Effectiveness of Logic in Computer Science |
04/17/2005 | Mathematics of organic chemistry? | Chemistry, Graph Tranformation and Programming Languages |
04/20/2005 | You sure? | Chemistry, Graph Tranformation and Programming Languages |
04/20/2005 | Oops, I did it again | Chemistry, Graph Tranformation and Programming Languages |
04/16/2005 | multitier solutions | Links |
04/01/2005 | Fold? | Fold Must Fold! |
09/20/2005 | Tried something like that, but didn't really work (yet) | expressivity of "idiomatic C++" |
09/21/2005 | Great | expressivity of "idiomatic C++" |
03/19/2005 | Short question | Halting program density? |
03/23/2005 | Good show | Halting program density? |
03/23/2005 | Yeah | Halting program density? |
02/25/2005 | Cool typesetting | Proof and Counterexample |
02/25/2005 | Probably not needed | Journals and papers? |
02/04/2005 | NF | A question for the theory guys |
02/04/2005 | Preemptive bootstrapping? | Neologism |
02/03/2005 | If so, it's a strong, strong | Avoiding worst case GC with large amounts of data? |
01/18/2005 | present, past and future | Dynamic Eager Haskell |
12/19/2004 | Condolences | Absence |
12/18/2004 | Don't understand the problem | HM-style type inference with non-unique selectors? |
12/18/2004 | Relax, we understand j00 | HM-style type inference with non-unique selectors? |
12/18/2004 | The larch | HM-style type inference with non-unique selectors? |
12/18/2004 | Is there anything wrong with the GC package? | The Memory Pool System: Thirty person-years of memory management development goes Open Source |
12/20/2004 | I agree | The Memory Pool System: Thirty person-years of memory management development goes Open Source |
12/20/2004 | True | The Memory Pool System: Thirty person-years of memory management development goes Open Source |
12/07/2004 | Every argument can be countered... | Definition of Type |
12/08/2004 | constructive+ intuitionistic = ... | Definition of Type |
12/07/2004 | Meaningless meaningfull programs | Definition of Type |
12/09/2004 | To the extreme | Definition of Type |
12/05/2004 | Peircian semiotics? | What's a definition of "type" that beginners can understand? |
10/08/2004 | Ha! | Laszlo - So good, I had to change my underwear |
10/06/2004 | From the Tunes project | House , hOp - the Haskell Operating System |
10/03/2004 | Shoot-out: most annoying compiler error message | Shoot-out: most annoying compiler error message |
10/04/2004 | Error messages which make you go umph! | Shoot-out: most annoying compiler error message |
10/08/2004 | But what | Probabilistic languages for kids? |
09/22/2004 | Well.... | Questions about Semantics. |
09/24/2004 | No worries | Questions about Semantics. |
09/24/2004 | God now I am replying to my own posts again... | Questions about Semantics. |
09/21/2004 | Oretachi Hyokinzoku | Dijkstra on analogies and anthropomorphism |
09/24/2004 | You sure, must be trolling... I hope | Dijkstra on analogies and anthropomorphism |
09/24/2004 | Issunboushi! | Dijkstra on analogies and anthropomorphism |
09/26/2004 | Yes, it is | Dijkstra on analogies and anthropomorphism |
09/12/2004 | Couldn't agree more. I have s | Use real names |
09/12/2004 | Anonymity vs. Pseudonymity - the bet | Use real names |
09/24/2004 | Damn you beat me to it... | Explaining monads |
09/26/2004 | Where are you going with that fork! | Explaining monads |
09/26/2004 | I am not that sure too, however... | Explaining monads |
09/24/2004 | Stones | Explaining monads |
09/26/2004 | Nice idea | Explaining monads |
12/18/2008 | I agree with you here | Explaining monads |
12/18/2008 | Everything is a monad | Explaining monads |
12/18/2008 | Break my vow of silence again | Explaining monads |
12/16/2008 | It's just an observation | Explaining monads |
12/16/2008 | ADT | Explaining monads |
12/16/2008 | Languages | Explaining monads |
12/18/2008 | I irritate myself being irritated with something which irritates | Explaining monads |
01/03/2009 | Slight disagreement | Explaining monads |
01/06/2009 | Well okay, since I am invited to respond | Explaining monads |
01/06/2009 | Tssss........ | Explaining monads |
01/07/2009 | More technical | Explaining monads |
01/07/2009 | Duh.. | Explaining monads |
01/07/2009 | Ok | Explaining monads |
01/07/2009 | IO | Explaining monads |
01/07/2009 | Monads do not model IO | Explaining monads |
01/08/2009 | Dissecting monads | Explaining monads |
01/09/2009 | Alternatives | Explaining monads |
01/09/2009 | Aesthetics | Explaining monads |
01/11/2009 | Well... | Explaining monads |
01/11/2009 | Not supporting HOFs | Explaining monads |
01/11/2009 | Good, HOCs then | Explaining monads |
01/11/2009 | Enough arrows | Explaining monads |
01/08/2009 | Dissecting dissections | Explaining monads |
01/07/2009 | If I squeeze my eyes I see... | Explaining monads |
01/07/2009 | I didn't read it as such, that's true | Explaining monads |
01/06/2009 | Frankly, I think a lot of | Explaining monads |
12/16/2008 | What about Calc? | Explaining monads |
12/16/2008 | A monad - last comment | Explaining monads |
LtU Topic Index Sorted by Date | LtU Topic Index Sorted by Topic | LtU Index of Post Authors | Zipped LtU Archive |