Posts By: rmalafaia
Date | Post | Topic |
07/30/2008 | Happy birthday! | Happy Birthday, dear Lambda! |
11/03/2007 | oh please! | Examples of large-scale functional language projects |
10/14/2007 | hmm | Examples of large-scale functional language projects |
10/08/2007 | of course, the real reason | Computing is a Natural Science |
10/13/2007 | are we not? | Computing is a Natural Science |
10/14/2007 | if it's not a science, God | Computing is a Natural Science |
09/18/2007 | and Emacs has been doing it | DivaScheme |
09/18/2007 | what do you mean? It's | DivaScheme |
10/01/2007 | huh?! | Q: Modularizing SQL? |
09/06/2007 | meh! | Q: Modularizing SQL? |
09/06/2007 | hmm | What is a state? |
09/06/2007 | thanks! | What is a state? |
09/07/2007 | Humans are curious by | What is a state? |
07/25/2007 | woohoo! | Liskell |
07/26/2007 | yeah, *now* it does. | Liskell |
11/18/2006 | sorry to say, but | De-Scheming MIT? |
11/16/2006 | offtopic, but i felt a lot | Second Life Faces Threat to its Virtual Economy |
11/18/2006 | btw, open-sourcing Solaris | Sun Open Sources Java Platform |
11/14/2006 | hmm, i thought it was | SICP Translations |
11/14/2006 | funny | Random "if it bends it is funny, if it breaks it isn't funny" line of thought |
10/17/2006 | just to clear this up: | Block-scope |
10/18/2006 | oh! really news to me! so | Block-scope |
10/16/2006 | very true. C syntax hiding | Good Ideas, Through the Looking Glass |
10/16/2006 | Wirth was talking about | Good Ideas, Through the Looking Glass |
10/16/2006 | Wirth has always been firmly | Good Ideas, Through the Looking Glass |
10/10/2006 | lol | The US Torture Bill as C code |
10/11/2006 | "correcting this ancient | The US Torture Bill as C code |
10/12/2006 | of course... | The US Torture Bill as C code |
10/13/2006 | hmm... <- works just fine to | The US Torture Bill as C code |
10/12/2006 | So, in the end it all boils | The US Torture Bill as C code |
10/12/2006 | design time | The US Torture Bill as C code |
10/05/2006 | goodie | Assembly language for Power Architecture |
10/06/2006 | from the looks of it... | Google Code Search |
10/06/2006 | pascal too offers "manual | Google Code Search |
10/02/2006 | Tim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs | Tim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs |
10/02/2006 | yes, i agree quickly | Tim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs |
10/02/2006 | well | Tim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs |
10/02/2006 | you know i don't dig | Tim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs |
10/02/2006 | nothing at all | Tim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs |
10/02/2006 | yes! | Tim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs |
10/02/2006 | "the initial scaffolding of | Tim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs |
10/02/2006 | yes | Tim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs |
10/03/2006 | clarification | Tim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs |
10/03/2006 | "I obviously get that Ruby | Tim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs |
10/03/2006 | indeed | Tim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs |
10/03/2006 | it's a farewell | Tim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs |
10/03/2006 | so long! | Tim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs |
10/03/2006 | external processes running | Tim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs |
10/04/2006 | actually, it's another | Tim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs |
10/02/2006 | You guys think this is a | Tim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs |
10/02/2006 | not quite | Tim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs |
10/02/2006 | thanks. sounds interesting. | Tim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs |
10/02/2006 | windows@work && | Business Objects Quark - Haskell meets Java |
10/03/2006 | 2 nice options | Why Johnny can't code |
07/09/2006 | ha! | CLPython - an implementation of Python in Common Lisp |
07/03/2006 | well | Amusing question |
06/23/2006 | don't forget | Petition for adding garbage collection to C++. |
06/23/2006 | the old mantra | Petition for adding garbage collection to C++. |
06/24/2006 | wtf?! | Petition for adding garbage collection to C++. |
06/24/2006 | interfaces | Petition for adding garbage collection to C++. |
06/24/2006 | regardless | Petition for adding garbage collection to C++. |
06/25/2006 | hmm | Petition for adding garbage collection to C++. |
06/24/2006 | if it's working... | Petition for adding garbage collection to C++. |
06/20/2006 | like this? | The OO barrier |
06/22/2006 | hacks | The OO barrier |
05/29/2006 | common sense | Buried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff |
05/29/2006 | abstractions all the way down | Buried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff |
05/30/2006 | overengineering | Buried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff |
05/30/2006 | bureacracy | Buried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff |
05/29/2006 | re: | Buried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff |
05/30/2006 | smart | Buried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff |
05/29/2006 | hmm | Buried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff |
05/29/2006 | re: | Buried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff |
05/29/2006 | re: | Buried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff |
05/30/2006 | tsc | Buried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff |
05/26/2006 | pretty cool! | Linspire chooses Haskell as preferred language |
05/27/2006 | just guessing | Linspire chooses Haskell as preferred language |
05/20/2006 | yes | Ethnographic Study of Copy and Paste Programming Practices in OOPL |
05/19/2006 | that's weird | Google Web Toolkit |
05/17/2006 | no, it hasn't | ruby vs python |
05/18/2006 | yeah, wasn't it for monads | ruby vs python |
05/10/2006 | Lisp end | The Nature of Lisp (a tutorial) |
05/04/2006 | also | Your favourite editor/IDE |
05/27/2006 | yet refactoring | Your favourite editor/IDE |
05/03/2006 | vim | Your favourite editor/IDE |
05/25/2006 | "you often lose the context | Your favourite editor/IDE |
05/04/2006 | hmm | Your favourite editor/IDE |
05/26/2006 | highly unlikely | Your favourite editor/IDE |
05/31/2006 | little but useful feature | Your favourite editor/IDE |
05/04/2006 | heh | Proofs are Programs: 19th Century Logic and 21st Century Computing |
05/04/2006 | wow! | Natural Language Programming for Interactive Fiction |
04/25/2006 | well | Build your own scripting language for Java |
04/25/2006 | until | Build your own scripting language for Java |
04/19/2006 | you know... | Lang .NET 2006 |
04/19/2006 | heh | Lang .NET 2006 |
04/20/2006 | yep. except for the money. :) | Lang .NET 2006 |
04/20/2006 | I don't think you get the | Lang .NET 2006 |
04/20/2006 | ok | Lang .NET 2006 |
04/10/2006 | provocative, as always, Mr. | Functional Programming Has Reached The Masses; It's Called Visual Basic |
03/28/2006 | say | Generic Haskell II |
03/22/2006 | overrated | Gosling vs. Dynamic Languages |
03/26/2006 | perhaps... | Gosling vs. Dynamic Languages |
03/22/2006 | great! | Using continuations in Web applications is patented |
03/17/2006 | wow! | Programming: 50, 100 years from now |
03/22/2006 | don't be so harsh! | Programming: 50, 100 years from now |
03/23/2006 | sheesh | Programming: 50, 100 years from now |
03/23/2006 | please | Programming: 50, 100 years from now |
03/17/2006 | I believe a millionaire with | Programming: 50, 100 years from now |
03/15/2006 | keyboards?! | Programming: 50, 100 years from now |
03/23/2006 | nah! | Programming: 50, 100 years from now |
03/02/2006 | cool | Do us proud, Dave! |
03/21/2006 | much older | Tail call elimination decorator in Python |
02/18/2006 | doesn't happen | Gilad Is Right |
02/12/2006 | interface | Guido: Language Design Is Not Just Solving Puzzles |
02/12/2006 | simpler yet | Guido: Language Design Is Not Just Solving Puzzles |
02/13/2006 | never mind | Guido: Language Design Is Not Just Solving Puzzles |
02/17/2006 | modules | Guido: Language Design Is Not Just Solving Puzzles |
02/10/2006 | desire | Is STL algorithms doing damage to the cause? |
02/07/2006 | hah! | eWeek: 'Exotic' Programming Tools Go Mainstream |
02/06/2006 | quick and dirty | Unix as programming language |
02/04/2006 | AST tools | Unix as programming language |
02/05/2006 | not necessarily | Unix as programming language |
02/04/2006 | sorry | Packaging Data And Methods |
01/31/2006 | first time | Weak vs. strong typing |
01/24/2006 | masses | Beyond LINQ: A Manifesto For Distributed Data-Intensive Programming |
01/25/2006 | no | Beyond LINQ: A Manifesto For Distributed Data-Intensive Programming |
01/22/2006 | Ubuntu Linux | Choice of OS of LtU readers |
01/27/2006 | odd | Choice of OS of LtU readers |
01/23/2006 | I wonder if Frank Atanassow | Choice of OS of LtU readers |
01/26/2006 | ease? | Choice of OS of LtU readers |
01/27/2006 | well, then... | Choice of OS of LtU readers |
01/11/2006 | way cool! thanks for the lin | Classic CS Texts |
01/02/2006 | wow | Guy Steele on Language Design |
12/30/2005 | but not surprising at all | Guy Steele on Language Design |
11/25/2005 | "The higher you catch the dee | Ruby the Rival |
11/22/2005 | you do know its stated goal i | Fortress Specs Updated: 0.785 |
11/22/2005 | a hacker's idol | Fortress Specs Updated: 0.785 |
11/12/2005 | bother? | OCaml 3.0.9 |
11/06/2005 | now i'm curious | Programming Language Names |
10/30/2005 | same as Eclipse | Does Visual Studio Rot the Mind? |
11/02/2005 | actually... | Does Visual Studio Rot the Mind? |
10/28/2005 | interesting name for a project | An Overview of the Singularity Project |
11/03/2005 | LOC | Bruce Tate: Technologies that may challenge Java |
11/03/2005 | idiom | Bruce Tate: Technologies that may challenge Java |
11/03/2005 | options | Bruce Tate: Technologies that may challenge Java |
11/04/2005 | ok, i see your point | Bruce Tate: Technologies that may challenge Java |
11/03/2005 | haskell | Bruce Tate: Technologies that may challenge Java |
10/22/2005 | problem is... | Bruce Tate: Technologies that may challenge Java |
10/29/2005 | interesting | Bruce Tate: Technologies that may challenge Java |
10/25/2005 | KISS | Bruce Tate: Technologies that may challenge Java |
10/25/2005 | smalltalk | Bruce Tate: Technologies that may challenge Java |
10/25/2005 | levels | Bruce Tate: Technologies that may challenge Java |
10/25/2005 | no | Bruce Tate: Technologies that may challenge Java |
10/25/2005 | trying | Bruce Tate: Technologies that may challenge Java |
10/25/2005 | featureful | Bruce Tate: Technologies that may challenge Java |
10/25/2005 | strong integration | Bruce Tate: Technologies that may challenge Java |
10/21/2005 | what's the big news? | C#: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow: An Interview with Anders Hejlsberg |
10/21/2005 | odds | Larry Wal: State of the Onion |
10/18/2005 | and it shows... | Object Oriented Programming + Referential Transparency |
10/13/2005 | well... | American lecture tour gets real |
10/04/2005 | huh | The English-Likeness Monster |
09/27/2005 | comment moderation | LtU: Style and Focus |
09/28/2005 | hahah | LtU: Style and Focus |
09/29/2005 | thanks for the link | LtU: Style and Focus |
09/29/2005 | trolls | LtU: Style and Focus |
09/22/2005 | developers, developers, developers... | Don Box: Scheme Is Love |
09/22/2005 | ok | Don Box: Scheme Is Love |
09/23/2005 | more | Don Box: Scheme Is Love |
09/26/2005 | however | Don Box: Scheme Is Love |
09/27/2005 | generics | Don Box: Scheme Is Love |
09/28/2005 | it's ok | Don Box: Scheme Is Love |
09/21/2005 | simplicity for who? | Good languages with simple grammar |
09/21/2005 | strange association... | Dynamic typing in OCaml |
09/17/2005 | wohoo! | Guest Blogger Erik Meijer |
09/17/2005 | scripting | Guest Blogger Erik Meijer |
09/17/2005 | free as in beer | Most Productive FP Lang? |
09/17/2005 | re: summary | Most Productive FP Lang? |
09/14/2005 | i like... | Perl and Haskell |
09/12/2005 | i can attest... | Haskell and creative freedom |
09/12/2005 | well... | Haskell and creative freedom |
09/12/2005 | sorry | Haskell and creative freedom |
09/12/2005 | no | Haskell and creative freedom |
09/12/2005 | oh boy | Haskell and creative freedom |
09/13/2005 | it is not your point! | Haskell and creative freedom |
09/12/2005 | i think... | Haskell and creative freedom |
09/15/2005 | yes | Haskell and creative freedom |
09/05/2005 | and... | Guido van Rossum: Building an Open Source Project and Community |
09/13/2005 | equal | Guido van Rossum: Building an Open Source Project and Community |
08/30/2005 | the problem with squeak is th | Yearning for a practical scheme |
08/30/2005 | scheme | Yearning for a practical scheme |
09/02/2005 | indeed | Yearning for a practical scheme |
09/02/2005 | wow | Yearning for a practical scheme |
10/05/2005 | that's it! | Yearning for a practical scheme |
10/05/2005 | troller to no end | Yearning for a practical scheme |
10/06/2005 | correction | Yearning for a practical scheme |
08/29/2005 | coding fast | Tim Bray on Ruby |
08/30/2005 | how is this different from any other language... | Tim Bray on Ruby |
08/30/2005 | reliable | Tim Bray on Ruby |
08/30/2005 | Tim Bray on Ruby | Tim Bray on Ruby |
08/29/2005 | i don't need | Tim Bray on Ruby |
08/29/2005 | ah! | Tim Bray on Ruby |
08/30/2005 | heretic | Tim Bray on Ruby |
08/29/2005 | differences | Tim Bray on Ruby |
08/29/2005 | yep, no differences | Tim Bray on Ruby |
08/30/2005 | code-as-data | Tim Bray on Ruby |
08/30/2005 | ok | Tim Bray on Ruby |
08/30/2005 | fwd: | Tim Bray on Ruby |
08/31/2005 | high points | Tim Bray on Ruby |
08/31/2005 | which | Tim Bray on Ruby |
08/31/2005 | worse is better | Tim Bray on Ruby |
08/31/2005 | don't worry | Tim Bray on Ruby |
08/28/2005 | welcome! | Does Abstraction add Fuzziness? |
08/28/2005 | uh-oh! | Does Abstraction add Fuzziness? |
08/28/2005 | functional or not | Does Abstraction add Fuzziness? |
08/28/2005 | why, yes. it's C. and yes, it | Does Abstraction add Fuzziness? |
08/28/2005 | gotcha! | Does Abstraction add Fuzziness? |
08/28/2005 | here | Ivory Towers and Gelfand's Principle |
08/05/2005 | Ruby | Have scripting languages peaked? |
08/06/2005 | say again?! | Have scripting languages peaked? |
08/06/2005 | except he doesn't seem happy | Have scripting languages peaked? |
08/06/2005 | "Anyway, everyone knows that | Have scripting languages peaked? |
08/05/2005 | IDEs, not languages | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
08/05/2005 | yes | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
08/06/2005 | except of course... | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
08/06/2005 | well | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
08/06/2005 | not so fast! | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
08/06/2005 | quick | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
08/06/2005 | hippie-expand != code-completion | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
08/07/2005 | now i know what your problem is | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
08/07/2005 | thinking small | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
08/08/2005 | Anecdotal evidence? I'm givi | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
08/06/2005 | quantity != quality | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
08/08/2005 | yes | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
08/08/2005 | console | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
08/06/2005 | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
08/05/2005 | short and sweet answer | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
08/05/2005 | more of the same | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
07/05/2005 | Smalltalk the language | Squeak tutorial |
07/01/2005 | i wonder | Ook? |
07/01/2005 | programmable runtime | Functions as Classes: Which languages? |
07/02/2005 | yes! | Functions as Classes: Which languages? |
06/29/2005 | Java, Pascal | Why recursing is better than looping |
06/23/2005 | nice discussion... | Why recursing is better than looping |
06/22/2005 | java script | JavaScript 2.0: Evolving a Language for Evolving Systems |
06/22/2005 | libraries | Embedded Languages in Java |
06/22/2005 | GNU/Linux and C | Embedded Languages in Java |
06/22/2005 | modern portable C code... | Embedded Languages in Java |
06/23/2005 | i agree | Embedded Languages in Java |
06/24/2005 | no doubt! | Embedded Languages in Java |
06/15/2005 | you know it's a sad day... | Java Generics, Arrays, and Comparables |
06/15/2005 | glue code by glue code | Java Generics, Arrays, and Comparables |
06/16/2005 | nitpick | Java Generics, Arrays, and Comparables |
06/16/2005 | because | Java Generics, Arrays, and Comparables |
06/19/2005 | not really | Java Generics, Arrays, and Comparables |
06/11/2005 | man, this is awful | Links Demos |
06/09/2005 | bye, PHP | Happy Birthday, PHP... |
06/10/2005 | no doubt about it | Happy Birthday, PHP... |
06/11/2005 | How about the keyword def? O | Happy Birthday, PHP... |
06/11/2005 | care to elaborate? | Happy Birthday, PHP... |
06/11/2005 | Because i see no such cruft a | Happy Birthday, PHP... |
06/10/2005 | i wonder... | Happy Birthday, PHP... |
06/10/2005 | no need for that. you are fo | Happy Birthday, PHP... |
06/10/2005 | congrats, man | Congrats in order |
06/10/2005 | on the verge of a cliff | What will Apple's move to Intel mean for Alternative Language Communities? |
06/10/2005 | Yep... | What will Apple's move to Intel mean for Alternative Language Communities? |
06/07/2005 | objective-c | What will Apple's move to Intel mean for Alternative Language Communities? |
06/09/2005 | sure | What will Apple's move to Intel mean for Alternative Language Communities? |
06/09/2005 | problem is | What will Apple's move to Intel mean for Alternative Language Communities? |
05/26/2005 | sadly | PLT Needs You! |
05/23/2005 | easy | Haskell for C Programmers |
05/24/2005 | if you want Python | Haskell for C Programmers |
05/24/2005 | replace | Haskell for C Programmers |
05/23/2005 | very nice! | Haskell for C Programmers |
05/19/2005 | Tail recursion | Tail recursion |
05/19/2005 | this might be the stupidiest post ever on LtU | Tail recursion |
05/17/2005 | sounds like macros in Scheme | Modern Language Features of Visual C++ 2005 |
05/17/2005 | i think | Grassroots computing languages hit the big time |
05/19/2005 | indeed... | Grassroots computing languages hit the big time |
05/19/2005 | yeah, i'm more of a pessimist... :) | Grassroots computing languages hit the big time |
05/19/2005 | doh! | Grassroots computing languages hit the big time |
05/19/2005 | yeah | Grassroots computing languages hit the big time |
05/19/2005 | open source | Grassroots computing languages hit the big time |
05/19/2005 | sarcasm | Grassroots computing languages hit the big time |
05/14/2005 | not exclusively COBOL | A question about COBOL! |
05/06/2005 | what's so bad about them? | Let's make a programming language! |
05/06/2005 | huh? | Let's make a programming language! |
05/06/2005 | indeed | Let's make a programming language! |
05/07/2005 | no | Let's make a programming language! |
05/09/2005 | not common sense... | Let's make a programming language! |
05/06/2005 | foo | Let's make a programming language! |
09/07/2008 | Yuck! The title is "Let's | Let's make a programming language! |
05/16/2005 | off-topic... | Call for Papers: ACM Symposium on Dynamic Languages |
09/29/2005 | bank teller | From Perl Monks: "pissed off about functional programming" |
09/29/2005 | yes, that sounds the right way... | From Perl Monks: "pissed off about functional programming" |
05/01/2005 | lazy evaluation | R6RS Scheme Status Report |
04/26/2005 | don't mean to be rude, but... | Implementing a Lisp Editor - Would like some advice. |
06/10/2005 | nitpick | Why do they program in C++? |
04/01/2005 | again!?? | Fold Must Fold! |
09/18/2005 | a long way | expressivity of "idiomatic C++" |
03/21/2005 | non-sense... | Script Vs Java |
10/03/2005 | python | The fate of reduce() in Python 3000 |
10/04/2005 | in other words... | The fate of reduce() in Python 3000 |
01/09/2005 | haha | The Four Questions |
01/12/2005 | yeah, that sure sounds just right | Ian Bicking: The challenge of metaprogramming |
01/14/2005 | yes | Ian Bicking: The challenge of metaprogramming |
10/21/2005 | now i'm curious | the Chinese natual language |
10/22/2005 | yes! | the Chinese natual language |
08/17/2008 | interesting | the Chinese natual language |
12/15/2004 | delight | Choosing a Language for Interactive Fiction |
12/05/2004 | Score! | Scheme on the CLR |
11/28/2004 | The right tool for the job | The IDE Divide |
11/28/2004 | I don't like it | The IDE Divide |
11/28/2004 | Emacs is not for the faint of heart | The IDE Divide |
10/20/2004 | I thought it was about Mozilla | MOZ 2004 talks available |
09/29/2004 | Rebel science | "The Silver Bullet" |
09/28/2004 | Tidbits | WikiTalk |
09/15/2004 | Something that reminds us of Lisp age... | newLisp: A better Lisp/Scheme Fusion... |
09/13/2004 | sorry, no | More from Udell on typing |
09/15/2004 | still | More from Udell on typing |
07/13/2006 | yamt | Explaining monads |
LtU Topic Index Sorted by Date | LtU Topic Index Sorted by Topic | LtU Index of Post Authors | Zipped LtU Archive |