Lambda the Ultimate Weblog Topics
Last Updated 03/21/2010

Posts By: Karsten Wagner

  Date    Post    Topic  
11/01/2006My way to think about monadsBest Introduction To Monads For Newbies (& Especially Imparative Minds) I'v Ever Read!!!
11/08/2006I totally agree that myBest Introduction To Monads For Newbies (& Especially Imparative Minds) I'v Ever Read!!!
08/20/2006Java has closuresClosures for Java or money back
08/20/2006Thats analgous to ocaml. YouClosures for Java or money back
08/20/2006You can get at outerClosures for Java or money back
08/21/2006finals aren't constants.Closures for Java or money back
08/23/2006'final' in this contextClosures for Java or money back
08/20/2006Sure there is a codeClosures for Java or money back
08/20/2006The topic is "Closures forClosures for Java or money back
08/20/2006No, in C++ there is no wayClosures for Java or money back
08/21/2006A refs simply is a smallClosures for Java or money back
08/21/2006That's impossible because itClosures for Java or money back
08/21/2006I don't want discuss aboutClosures for Java or money back
08/21/2006I believe Anders HejlsbergClosures for Java or money back
08/21/2006I have no problem withClosures for Java or money back
08/21/2006I agree that theClosures for Java or money back
08/20/2006You got it: Java is noClosures for Java or money back
08/21/2006Sure, there could be betterClosures for Java or money back
08/14/2006For some domains (low-levelHow to make a *truly* better alternative to C++
08/09/2006My experience withLisp Lovers, how would you fix Lisp or bring it up to date?
08/09/2006I think the macros of LispLisp Lovers, how would you fix Lisp or bring it up to date?
08/09/2006If there is some kind ofLisp Lovers, how would you fix Lisp or bring it up to date?
08/04/2006Also huge parts of thoseThe Killer Application for Concatenative Languages
07/18/2006In your examples youOOP Parallel class hierarchies
07/15/2006I've sometimes encounteredOOP Parallel class hierarchies
06/27/2006If an array gets an messageArticle: Exploring Cocoa with F-Script
06/27/2006My fault, for arrays it'sArticle: Exploring Cocoa with F-Script
06/29/2006Use the '@'Article: Exploring Cocoa with F-Script
06/27/2006I think it's psychologicalPetition for adding garbage collection to C++.
06/28/2006I think pure fp withPetition for adding garbage collection to C++.
06/28/2006You wrote "remove allPetition for adding garbage collection to C++.
06/21/2006RecursionRules for Developing Safety-Critical Code
06/21/2006I wonder if it's generallyRules for Developing Safety-Critical Code
06/21/2006A simple and clean way to doWhat are the real benefits of FP?
06/21/2006Or if you define them likeWhat are the real benefits of FP?
06/16/2006OO is deadThe OO barrier
06/16/2006A module can encapsulateThe OO barrier
06/16/2006Ruby uses it's dynamism toThe OO barrier
06/16/2006Methods (those are theThe OO barrier
06/17/2006Generic functions andThe OO barrier
06/16/2006There's always an 'entire program'The OO barrier
06/16/2006I would view differentThe OO barrier
06/15/2006Why only 'minimal' languagesWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/15/2006But why stop at thoseWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/16/2006The problem of Perl is it'sWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/15/2006Most compilers areWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/15/2006So you think it'sWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/15/2006And what about Lisp?Why only 'minimal' languages
06/15/2006Lisp shows that it'sWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/16/2006Its true, that Lisp can doWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/15/2006Thats the standard way to do it...Why only 'minimal' languages
06/16/2006There is of course aWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/17/2006It's quite possible that theWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/16/2006I think that most people whoWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/16/2006Preventing those "parasiticWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/16/2006But simplicity has it'sWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/16/2006Haskell is minimal in theWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/17/2006But those features are onlyWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/17/2006It's useless to compare aWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/16/2006Not every language design isWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/17/2006And if you want to write toWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/16/2006Most of the conflictingWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/16/2006I doubt thatWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/17/2006Last answerWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/16/2006false estimationWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/16/2006Why would that never happen?Why only 'minimal' languages
06/16/2006Why should your code appearWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/16/2006every language needs libraries, but...Why only 'minimal' languages
06/17/2006I also see the goal ofWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/18/2006Some clarificationsWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/18/2006I maybe don't reallyWhy only 'minimal' languages
06/18/2006I tried to clarifyWhy only 'minimal' languages
11/18/2005Java is also 'dynamic'Ruby the Rival
11/18/2005Only if you wantRuby the Rival
11/19/2005Sure it isRuby the Rival
11/19/2005Some clarificationsRuby the Rival
11/19/2005Not totallyRuby the Rival
11/19/2005There is obviously some confusionRuby the Rival
11/20/2005Its not just black and whiteRuby the Rival
11/20/2005In a real static typed languaRuby the Rival
11/20/2005I would put it this way: YouRuby the Rival
11/21/2005'Static typing' means that tyRuby the Rival
11/21/2005Concering 'strong/weak-typingRuby the Rival
11/21/2005Normally only a method-call vRuby the Rival
11/21/2005Generics can only create ClasRuby the Rival
11/21/2005So you think that a good langRuby the Rival
11/21/2005Types are not 'syntax', theyRuby the Rival
11/01/2006What about reference based equality?Object Oriented Programming + Referential Transparency

LtU Topic Index Sorted by Date LtU Topic Index Sorted by Topic LtU Index of Post Authors Zipped LtU Archive

Chris Rathman/ Chris.Rathman@tx.rr.com