UK Anglican Bishop Fined £47,345 and Sent for
"Re-Education" in Gay Employment Case
By Hilary White
LONDON, February 11, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The
Anglican bishop of Hereford has been ordered by a court to undergo "equal
opportunities training" and pay a fine of £47,345.00, for refusing to hire
an active homosexual for a position of trust with young people. The ruling also
stated that Hereford diocese staff "involved in recruitment should receive
equal opportunities training".
"The respondents discriminated against the
claimant on the grounds of sexual orientation," said the ruling from the
Cardiff Employment Tribunal.
The Right Reverend Anthony Priddis refused to hire a
homosexual man, John Reaney, as a youth worker on the grounds that the
Christian religion holds sexual continence within natural marriage as the norm.
He told media that he stands by his original decision and may appeal the
ruling.
When Mr. Reaney, an active homosexual who sees no
conflict with his lifestyle and his Christian beliefs, was refused for a
position with the diocese as a youth officer, he launched a complaint with the
Employment Tribunal. This complaint was funded by the homosexual political
organization Stonewall and was considered by them and others as a test case in
the application of the so-called "religious exemption" of recently
passed Equality legislation that prohibits "discrimination" on the
grounds of "sexual orientation".
The Tribunal dismissed the arguments of Bishop Priddis
who said the refusal was not about "discrimination" but about
upholding Christian sexual morality. He said he had made it clear to Mr. Reaney
and the Tribunal that a person in a sexual relationship outside marriage,
whatever their "sexual orientation", would be turned down for a post
in the diocese.
"The Church's teaching draws distinction between
sexual orientation and practice and lifestyle," Bishop Priddis said. "We
didn't discriminate against Mr. Reaney on the grounds of sexuality. Had we done
so we wouldn't have called him for an interview."
But Philip Whealy, spokesman for the Christian
Congress for Traditional Values (CCTV) told LifeSiteNews.com that the decision
is about more than just one man and one bishop. It "highlights the general
trend in the UK towards the destruction of freedom of conscience and
speech."
Whealy identified the decision of the Employment
Tribunal as a victory for the homosexual movement that wants to suppress and
ultimately criminalize the public expression of Christian sexual morality.
The Tribunal heard that after Mr. Reaney was refused
the position, the diocese did not hire any other applicant and the position was
dissolved because of financial constraints.
The Daily Telegraph reports that the compensation
award to Mr. Reaney includes £7,000 damages for "psychiatric injury"
and £6,000 for "injury to feelings".
Employment Tribunals are a form of lower courts in
Great Britain which have jurisdiction to hear disputes between employers and
employees. Unlike the Canadian Human Rights Tribunals, however, both parties
must pay their own costs and a lawyer is appointed as "Chairman" of
the proceedings. Most commonly, disputes going before Employment Tribunals are
concerned with unfair dismissal and discrimination.
Anni Holden, spokesman for the Diocese of Hereford,
said, "We are now aware that when making such an appointment we must make
it clear if it is a genuine occupational requirement that the post-holder
should believe in and uphold the Christian belief and ideal of marriage, and
that sexual relationships are confined to marriage."
"This is the crux of the matter, not sexual
orientation."
Holden said that the diocese of Hereford would be
declining the offer made by Stonewall to provide the "equal opportunities
training" ordered by the Tribunal.
Philip Whealy said the case is only part of a bigger
picture of erosion of civil liberties in Britian, in the name of
"equality". Christians, he said, "must stop hiding away praying
and prayerfully speak out the clear truths of Scripture without fear. The
freedoms we clearly take for granted were, in many cases, bought with blood and
liberty and must not be relinquished at any cost."
"Christians extend God's love to a sinful and
hurting world, but that does not mean that they will, or should, lie down and
accept a secular redefinition of Biblical morality."