ABOUT UFORCE!
_______________A WHITE KNIGHT PRODUCTION_______________
To all:
First, thanks to Dan of UFOzone for sending me this article:
http://www.rense.com/general10/mitch.htm from Jeff Rense's one-of-a-kind excellent world news website.
Second: Dr. Steven Greer used my copyrighted UFO videos to sell, promote
and include in his past 'paid public lectures,' without my expressed
permission. He showed my stated UFO video tape (of June 11, 1995, (c) by
Jason Leigh) to the U.S. Congress in 1997, as was verified by Dr. Bob
Hieronimus (and was mentioned to my surprise on one of our 'on-air'
radio interviews), who was present at that U.S. Congress meeting
conducted by Dr. Greer, again: without my written, or expressed
permission. A blatant copyright infringement . . .
I wrote to Dr. Greer, who at first, denied having ever showed this
footage, but then recanted when I wrote him back and related what Dr.
Bob Hieronimus had told me, stating that he (Dr. Greer) had,
"forgotten." Now, I certainly didn't mind--and was actually proud that
my UFO footage was included in the presentation to the U.S. Congress
back in 1997, but NOT when it was used in 'paid lectures' presented to
the public and was also included in his UFO promotional videotape--which
was also 'sold' for purposes for profit, or monetary gain: yet another
copyright infringement.
Since the amazing broad daylight UFO was videotaped by me on June 11,
1995, I have invested over $5,000.00 to date to present this 'proven'
footage to the world--for free. But when other would take (or steal)
this copyrighted footage and profit from it without so much as a 'howdy
do' to me: it certainly would have anyone put in a mood of discontent,
and a feeling of contriteness, or of 'wrong doing.'
It seems that the stories we have all heard of Dr. Greer and his
'non-profit' organization ('non-profit' meaning he does not offer any
moneys towards charites--only towards the 'Disclosure Project') 'using'
other people's research, names and photographs to promote his own
project is such a derogatory issue, that we should all be infuriated by
this inexcusable conduct.
I, for one, am bewildered at the attentions he has been able to reap via
the paranormal and major media in his 'Disclosure Project,' which should
have a post-script to it by giving credit where credit is due to the
many HUNDREDS of people he has used as well as the above mentioned thief
and misuse of other people's work and names, usually, and apparently:
without their consent. He should be brought up on charges for his
illegal actions in an attempt to force the U.S. government to admit to
the reality of UFOs, but this would just bring yet another collective
'black eye' to this field of research, which is scared enough by the
countless others who have perpetrated hoaxes and lies, most assuredly
for personal profit and gain.
Will I sue Dr. Greer for infringing upon, and profiting from, my
copyrighted video of the UFO? I am not sure at this point, although
others in this field have suggested that I should--and must.
What say ye?
I affirm that the above is true, and correct.
Jason Leigh
http://jasonleigh.org