Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
Back to Main Page

In Conclusion

The Study of the Old and New Testament will be made all during your preparation. The Teaching of all this whitch precedes completion will be required for each seminarian destined for the Priesthood.

In requiring this general education, we only have one objective, forewarn the members of our clergy of all historical and doctrinal questions that the external world could ask them.

Indeed, we know very well that since the time of Our Lord and in the first centuries of the church the Deacons and the Priests were elected on account of their zeal, of their faith and their immense charity, and not by virtue of a diploma. The Popes themselves chose the cardinals from among the Deacons and Priests, as well as from the Bishops.

That which was just mentioned does not mean that our Church spurns all scholarship. It is proud when certain of its sons produces profound studies on such or such ancient subject. It is there, the work of Hermeticism, in which our Gnostic Masters excel outside of their priesthood.

These eight course have only as their goal to give a rudimentary knowledge to our Deacons and Priests, so that they will never be ignorant of the problems that could be posed to them.

In effect, one must not confuse scholarship and religious knowledge. The first is the lot of doctors, historians, theologians, etc. That does not make it the primary objective of our Church. The second is a basic education for our clergy. We are not upset if on a point of history that our seminarians are ignorant of the fact that in 1294 Pope Boniface VIII named four cardinals belonging to his own family (three nephews and an uncle) or that after 1049 in the pontificate of Leo IX the cardinals used the miter in their coat of arms. If they know it, so much the better, and we would rejoice in that, but we prefer that they spend their energy in spreading the charity of Christ in giving an example of their faith and of their self-sacrifice.

Our course of theology has as its sole goal to furnish the answers to questions which could come from the outside world, touching our validity, our sacraments, our ritual, our liturgy, etc.

Our study does not thoroughly examine the decisions of the Councils which took place the first day of the 11th century (1054 which saw the Church of Christ torn in two factions: the West "Rome" and the East "Antioch, Jerusalem Constantinople".) That would be fastidious and useless.

That one knows only that in the first century there was one Council of Jerusalem, that there were eight in the second century, 18 in the third, 91 in the fourth, 94 in the fifth, 84 in the sixth, 115 in the ninth, 43 in the tenth, 134 in the 11th, that is 676 Councils since the beginning of the Christian era in 1100...Because 123 Councils in the 12th century, 53 in the 14th century, 8 in the 16th century until the Council of Trent does not interest us, since it is all about Rome.

On the contrary, we underline the decisive treatises that came out of the first Councils, from the time when there was only one Church of Christ.

What counts for us is what the first successors of Christ decided.


The public, badly informed, does not know the truth. It believes naively that there exists only one Church of Christ..the Roman one. From this fact, everything which is not Roman becomes suspect. It is about time that the legend from our beginning: "there is no salvation outside the Roman Church" meets its end.

It is about time that we abandon the ancient grudge in order to remember the words of the prophet: "I will pardon their iniquity, and I will not remember their faults and their sins "(Hebrews 8:12).

Excerpts
Translated from the French
Under the Auspices of
Monseigneur Robert M. Cokinis
Presiding Bishop of the Midwest
Ecclesia Gnostica Apostolica Catholica



Back to Main Page