My Home Page

My Favorite things about Angelfire.

My Favorite Web Sites

Angelfire - Free Home Pages
Free Web Building Help
Lycos - Search the Web
CareerPath - Where Employers and Employees Click

April 9th, 2000: Sunday

Queen to throw royal birthday bash costing 100,000 pounds(Yahoo: Reuters)

LONDON (Reuters) - The Queen plans to host one of the largest birthday parties the royal house has ever seen at a cost of about 100,000 pounds, the Sunday Mirror reported.
Prince William, who turns 18 on June 21, will be the guest of honour at the bash to be held at Windsor Castle.
The Mirror said the party was designed to celebrate several royal birthdays this year.
The Queen Mother turns 100 on August 4, Princess Margaret will be 70 in the same month and Princess Anne will be 50. Prince Andrew celebrated his 40th in February.
Buckingham Palace could not be reached for comment.
The Mirror said up to 700 guests would be invited, including members of European royal families, music and television stars.
~*~

Prince Michael in defence sales row (UK Times)
Adam Nathan

PRINCE Michael of Kent was at the centre of a royals-for-hire row last night after it emerged that he is acting as a consultant to a company seeking sales of CS gas and police equipment to regimes in the Gulf.
He has made several visits to the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in the past six months, for which he is thought to have been paid £25,000 in expenses.
He has been promoting a company called Selectamark Consultancy, which aims to sell CS gas to security forces in Saudi Arabia and the UAE, both of which have been accused by human rights groups of brutality and torture.
James Brown, managing director of Selectamark, a specialist security company of which the prince is president, said: "CS gas is a regular product. If we hear that products are wanted, we act as middlemen and organise the sale. We sell armoured Land Rovers. We sell body armour. We train police in crowd control. We only draw the line at small arms."
Selectamark is a member of the British Security Industry Association (BSIA), an umbrella group of security firms of which Prince Michael is patron. Brown conceded that the prince was of value to the company because his royal connections gave him access to ministers and others.
"He is incredibly well connected in the Gulf. We have potential sales of £750,000 from a fair in Dubai he attended," Brown said. There is no suggestion that the prince is directly engaged in the sale of CS gas.
Industry figures are expected to show that BSIA companies' foreign sales have increased by 50% to about £200m in the year since the prince has been their patron.
His office emphasised last week that there was nothing improper in the prince promoting the interests of the business. "[He] has made it clear to the BSIA that he does not support the sale of any 'sharp' weapon to be used offensively," said a spokesman. He denied that the prince was abusing his title to make money.
Michael is not on the civil list and does not receive state money. But he does enjoy grace and favour accommodation at Kensington Palace in London.
"This has the potential to bring the royal family into disrepute," said Paul Flynn, Labour MP for Newport West. "It is not the sort of thing a cousin of the Queen should be engaging in.
"CS gas is controversial in Britain, let alone the Gulf. It also opens him to accusations that he is trading on his royal title. He is not an entrepreneur. The royals should think carefully about how they make a living. In business, they should shed their royal personas."
It was also revealed last week by a diplomatic source at the British embassy in Abu Dhabi that the prince is known as "the escort service" for his frequent trips to the Gulf on behalf of British businesses. He is a keen promoter of Coutts Bank, with whom he has an account, and recently attended the opening of its Abu Dhabi branch.
The prince's contacts in the Gulf are impeccable. He is close to the ruling Al Nahayan family in Abu Dhabi and Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, crown prince of Dubai and UAE defence minister, is a key contact.
His controversial business interests have aroused concern at Buckingham Palace in the past. The Queen was reportedly furious when she watched her cousin advertising tacky gifts on American television under the rubric "House of Windsor". Later it was revealed that he had been secretly hiring himself out at £3,500 a time to a public relations firm. It paid him to arrange dinner parties without telling guests they were to be seated next to agency representatives, who would attempt to secure them as clients.
Last night friends of the prince said he had been trying to "clean up his act" after a career history chequered by controversy. Among his former business partners is "Prince" Idris al-Senussi, a Libyan businessman accused of involvement in an Egyptian bank scandal in the mid-1980s.
The Selectamark Consultancy is made up of former police officers and military people, including a former head of the royal protection squad. According to Brown, the consultancy's aim is to bring foreign police up to British standards.
Amnesty International said: "Police forces in both Saudi and UAE have a reputation for human rights violations."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

April 10th, 2000: Monday German prince meets his wartime British rescuers (UK Times)
FROM MARTIN FLETCHER, EUROPEAN CORRESPONDENT

MORE than half a century ago a German prince and his family were whisked from under the noses of the advancing Russian Army and spared likely death in Soviet camps. At the weekend, he met his British rescuers for the first time.
Prince Jos-Christian Stolberg-Stolberg was five when Stan Taylor's platoon dashed into eastern Germany to take his parents and their four children to safety. Only now, thanks to a newspaper article, has he been able to express his gratitude face to face. At the Prince's invitation Mr Taylor, 83, a former council education officer from York, and his batman, Harry Henshaw, a 73-year-old retired postal worker from Manchester, travelled to Brussels. "I am very thankful that almost two generations later we are able to relive those moments," the Prince, 59, said, adding: "I'm enchanted everybody is still in good health and able to make it."
At the close of the Second World War, Lieutenant Taylor was part of a King's Regiment unit based in Goslar, near what was to become the border between West and East Germany, and charged with seizing German assets before they were destroyed.
On July 1, 1945, the Duke of Brunswick, a relative of the Royal Family, walked into the unit's headquarters and urged it to rescue the Stolberg family. Their 25,000-acre estate and its castle were in territory granted to the Russians.
British troops were barred from the Russian zone but Lieutenant Taylor was ordered to leave with three 3-tonne lorries to retrieve the family's treasures. On the trip to the castle, 60 miles away in the Harz mountains, they met no Russians and took back silver, porcelain, oil paintings and 24,000 antique books.
The family was desperate to leave. "I had to tell the Prince's father 'I haven't come for you. I've come for the silver'," he recalled. That evening Lieutenant Taylor's platoon was ordered to go back for the family. As the lorries returned he saw red flags hanging from the town's windows. From the castle he saw the first Russian troops entering the streets below. "I told the family they had one hour to get packed. After that we're gone," he said.
He crammed 50 aristocrats and retainers into the lorries and told them to keep quiet. The convoy rumbled into the town, where it was stopped by the Russian advance guard, who wanted to carry out a search. The townsfolk formed a passage through which the vehicles sped to Goslar. "It was very cloak-and-daggerish," Lieutenant Taylor said.
The Stolbergs settled in West Germany, then in 1968 the Prince moved to Brussels. Because his rescuers were in a clandestine unit he had been unable to trace them until a cousin sent a clipping of Mr Henshaw's interview with a Goslar newspaper.
Now the three are planning a summer visit to Stolberg, but there will be no return to the castle. The Prince was unable to reclaim it on German reunification and it is now a ruin.
~*~

Duke will make an exhibition of himself(UK Times)
BY LINUS GREGORIADIS

THE Duke of Edinburgh is to display a private collection of cartoons in which he has been lampooned over the past half a century.
The exhibition, which will include works by Giles, the late Daily Express cartoonist who sent several originals to Buckingham Palace, runs at Sandringham from Saturday until October 8.
The Duke's interests, including wildlife, shooting, horses, photography and sailing, are all reflected in the cartoons - as is his sometimes fraught relationship with the media. A drawing by the late Evening Standard cartoonist Raymond Jackson - better known as Jak - depicts the Duke taking a photograph of some birds perched on rocks. In the caption the birds are saying: "Bloody photographers".
Gill Pattinson, Sandringham's visitor manager, said yesterday that the cartoons were of historical as well as comic interest, as they were "a social commentary on the big issues of the day".
The Duke paid tribute to the works of Carl Giles after the popular cartoonist died five years ago at the age of 78. He called him "a much-loved British institution".
Giles was made an OBE in 1959 and was later invited to lunch with the Queen and the Duke at Buckingham Palace.
~*~

'Multi-faith Coronation' for Charles(Electronic Telegraph)
By Rachel Sylvester

THE Prince of Wales could be crowned King in a multi-faith inauguration ceremony rather than the 1,000-year-old Coronation service, under proposals to tackle "religious discrimination" being considered by the Government.
A report commissioned by Jack Straw claims that the establishment of the Church of England causes "religious disadvantage" to other faiths and Christian denominations. The coronation ceremony, conducted by the Archbishop of Canterbury, in which the monarch swears to uphold the Protestant faith, may no longer be appropriate in modern, multi-cultural Britain, it says.
The sovereign's role as Supreme Governor of the Church of England and "Defender of the Faith" should also be reviewed. The paper, an interim report on religious discrimination, puts disestablishment of the Church of England firmly on the Government's agenda for the first time since Labour came to power.
Maintaining the exclusive link between Church and state may not be "the best or the most appropriate way forward in terms of the need to embody the principles of equity, inclusivity and participation in the contemporary plural society of the United Kingdom", it says.
Tony Blair has always shied away from the issue, insisting that he would not support disestablishment. However, he has become increasingly interested in the relationship between Christianity and other faiths. The Government would almost certainly resist severing the link altogether but senior figures think other religions should have a greater role in national life, just as representatives of other faiths are to be given seats in the Lords along with Anglican bishops.
The Church of England is itself considering ways to be more "inclusive". The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr George Carey, is reported to have told an audience in his diocese that he expects the Church one day to be disestablished.
The Home Office report, by Prof Paul Weller and a team at Derby university, says the next coronation will be the next focus of controversy which the Government should tackle as a matter of urgency. It says: "Coronations are state events which, historically, have expressed the close symbolic relationship between established religion and the state.
"The religious composition of society has changed significantly since the last coronation and the next coronation will therefore highlight a series of very important issues and complexities, which it would be best to begin giving consideration to as soon as possible."
Some Anglican bishops, including Dr David Hope, the Archbishop of York, have already been considering changes to the ritual, which has been a Christian ceremony since 973, when Edgar was crowned by Archbishop Dunstan at Bath. Proposals, which include involving other religious leaders, rewriting the oath and abandoning the eucharist, have been discussed.
Senior clergymen believe the next coronation cannot take the same form as the last ceremony, in 1953, when the Queen pledged to "preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England". The Prince of Wales has made clear that he wants to be the "defender of faith" rather than the "defender of the faith", in order to reflect the number of religions practised in Britain.
The Home Office paper criticises the "historically rooted religious disadvantage" to other faiths and Christian denominations caused by the establishment of the Church of England. This includes the fact that Roman Catholics are not allowed to succeed to the Throne and that the monarch has to swear an oath of allegiance to the Protestant church, it says.
The ban on the monarch marrying a Roman Catholic - which has been the subject of debate in the Scottish Parliament and at Westminster - and on Roman Catholic priests sitting in the Commons are also highlighted.
Although the report acknowledges that establishment is supported by many other religious leaders because it raises the profile of religion generally, it says that the Church of England's "special position" also makes other faiths feel excluded from society and should be subjected to "rigorous questioning".
Christianity has had a "privileged presence, sometimes as of right and sometimes as a consequence of tradition" which Judaism, Islam or Hinduism have not had, it concludes. Mr Straw commissioned the report following calls from Muslims for the law to be changed to ban religious discrimination. At the moment, Sikhs and Jews are protected because they are classified as a "race" but Muslims, Christians and Buddhists are not.
The researchers point out that the Human Rights Act, which takes effect in October, specifically protects people from discrimination on the grounds of religion and could lead to legal challenges if nothing is done. A Home Office spokesman said the report "is being looked at very thoroughly by the Home Office but nothing has been taken on board yet".
Philip Mawer, secretary general of the Archbishop's Council, said: "Coronations are primarily a statement of the sovereign's accountability; they emphasise the duty and service of the sovereign to the nation under God."
~*~

Paparazzi's role in Diana accident(BBC News)

Trevor Rees-Jones, Princess Diana's bodyguard and the sole survivor of her fatal car crash, has said photographers pursuing her created the atmosphere for the accident.
The 31-year-old fromer paratrooper from north Wales made the comments in an interview for a French television programme on Sunday.
"They are not directly responsible for the accident, but indirectly they created the atmosphere in which the accident happened," he told France 2 television.
Princess Diana died when the Mercedes in which she was travelling with her boyfriend Dodi al Fayed crashed into a pillar in a tunnel in Paris in August 1997.
The car was being chased by photographers mounted on motorcycles.
The photographers and a press courier were arrested and placed under investigation on suspicion of manslaughter and failure to assist accident victims.
But a French court cleared the nine photographers and the courier of responsibility in August last year.
Mr Rees-Jones, who has undergone extensive plastic surgery after suffering appalling injuries in the crash, said the photographers were "more aggressive than anywhere else".
The bodyguard has said he has no memory of the crash itself or of the minutes preceding it.
Mr Rees-Jones, who has written a book titled "The Bodyguard's Story", said he had not noticed that Henri Paul, deputy security chief at the Ritz hotel where the couple were staying and who was driving the car, was under the influence of alcohol.
"Nothing in the behaviour of the driver suggested he was drunk", Mr Rees-Jones said in the interview, recorded in London last Wednesday.
The inquiry into Diana's death concluded that Mr Paul was driving under the effect of alcohol and anti-depressants.
Mr Rees-Jones also discounted the theory put forward by Dodi's father, that there had been a conspiracy to kill the princess.
"(Mohammed al Fayed) believes that it was a conspiracy; he named a number of institutions; I can understand that sort of pain," he said.
"Mr Fayed had access to the same files I did and nothing suggests it was anything but a tragic accident."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

To April News
To News Archive