News for Wednesday: October 18th, 2000

Italy envies stability offered by Crown(UK Times)
FROM RICHARD OWEN IN ROME

ITALY’S press yesterday hailed the Queen as an abiding symbol of stability and continuity for a country which had neither.
Corriere della Sera spoke of the “discreet fascination of the monarchy” while La Stampa said that Italian fascination with the Queen’s visit — which has been given blanket media coverage — reflected “the fact that we ourselves lack any such symbol of national unity”. Italy was formed from a patchwork of duchies and principalities in 1870, and became a republic in 1946.
“The magic of monarchy seduces Italy”, ran the headline in La Repubblica. The paper added, however, that Italian interest in the Queen and her entourage was not to be confused with nostalgia for the former Italian royal family, who live in exile in Switzerland.
Il Giornale said that Italians had paid minute attention to every detail of dress and diet during the Queen’s trip. It said that although the supposed ban on the wearing of red and black in the Queen’s presence was probably apocryphal, most leading Italian ladies such as Donatalla Dini, the glamorous wife of Lamberto Dini, the Foreign Minister, had played safe by wearing elegant outfits in apricot or salmon. Il Messaggero said the Queen must have been struck by the number of women in senior positions in Italy compared to her last visit 20 years ago. The Italian centre-left government has several women ministers, including Giovanna Melanadri, the young New York-born Minister of culture.
~*~

A tender royal touch for frail Pope(UK Times)
FROM ALAN HAMILTON IN ROME

AT 108.7 acres the Vatican is the world’s smallest state, dwarfed even by Monaco and positively overwhelmed by Liechtenstein at 300 times its size. If it bears any similarity to the sovereign territory of the United Kingdom, it is that neither head of state enjoys the option of retirement.
The Pope, at 80, bears his years heavily, bowed with age and his left hand subject to the tremors of Parkinson’s disease. The Queen, at 74, remains sprightly, bright-eyed, even girlish in her enthusiasm. Her voice and body language at her meeting with John Paul II yesterday spoke a tender concern, as a doting daughter might treat an elderly father.
She came, not as Supreme Governor of a breakaway faith recently branded as “defective” by a prominent cardinal, but as one head of state paying a courtesy call on another during this millennium year of the Christian faith. She is the thirty-sixth so far this year to pay her respects to the Vatican but she was still accorded the Holy See’s full panoply of ceremony, involving Swiss Guards, coveys of cardinals and a tour of some of the finest domestic interiors in the world.
The Queen swept up in her motorcade to the wide, sunny courtyard of the Apostolic Palace to be greeted by a guard of honour of medieval helmets and tall pikestaffs. Her outfit was a safe, black calf-length two-piece, offset by three strings of pearls and some dazzling diamond jewellery on breast and wrists. Her entourage of 15, led by Robin Cook, the Foreign Secretary, matched her in dark suits or black dresses. She might have been going to a funeral except that her step was jaunty, her smile wide and her veil did not cover her face.
She was greeted at the palace door by Bishop James Harvey, a purple-clad American who is Prefect of the Papal Household in charge of receiving distinguished guests. They ascended to the second floor in a wooden lift and walked seemingly endless corridors through frescoed chambers of ever-increasing ornament until they reached the small, plain Sala del Tronetto, the Room of the Little Throne, which serves as the antechamber to the papal library.
When she was still some yards away the plain, solid door to the library was suddenly flung open from the inside by Bishop Dziwisz, the Pope’s Polish secretary. John Paul, in his white cassock, stood half-concealed inside, leaning on a stick. As the Queen approached the secretary took his stick, the Pope made a strenuous effort to unbend himself and stand erect, and stretched out his hand to greet the Queen on the threshold of his private quarters. “It’s a great pleasure to see you again,” she said brightly, taking his hand. They recalled that they had last met at Buckingham Palace in 1982.
Accompanied only by the Duke of Edinburgh, the Queen was ushered inside to sit opposite the Pope at his large, bare desk in a corner of a room largely devoid of ornament, its walls lined with paintings and bookcases full of old Bibles.
As the Queen was remarking how important the papal jubilee year was and asking if he had had many pilgrims, the door was closed, and for the next 24 minutes their meeting became private.
The library door reopened to reveal the Pope, slightly slumped and with his head almost resting on his right shoulder, sitting between the Queen and the Duke on ornate chairs at the other end of the room. All three rose as the Queen’s entourage filed in to be presented. In the manner of an investiture the Pope, helped by an aide, handed each a gift in a small, white leather jewellery box: a rosary for the women and a medal commemorating his papacy for the men.
Visitor and host walked down the room, the Queen hovering by the Pope’s side as though ready to catch him should he stumble. They reached a large table on which the gifts were displayed, the Queen’s set of volumes, handmade by the bindery at Windsor Castle, containing reproductions of 50 Canalettos in the royal collection. The Pope’s gift to her was a red leather-bound reproduction of a 13th-century illuminated manuscript of the New Testament.
With obvious delight, the Queen flicked through it. “What wonderful illustrations. How very kind. It will go back into our own library at Windsor.” The Pope stretched out his hand and gave the Queen another of his white boxes containing a rosary. She appeared touched. He grasped her right hand with both of his and shook it warmly. When he released his grip the Queen’s own hand was shaking, whether from emotion, nervousness or the strength of his grasp.
The audience was over. The Queen was whisked down yet more frescoed halls to meet the Vatican Secretary of State and to crane her neck at the glories of the restored Sistine Chapel, hastily cleared of tourists minutes before her arrival.
Queen and Pope are unlikely to meet again. But they appeared to have left relations between their churches in a better state than they have sometimes been. And down the labyrinthine corridors of the Vatican later yesterday breezed the whisper that the Queen’s personal concern for a frail and elderly man had been noted.
~*~

Two monarchs and a puritan(Electronic Telegraph) So it should be. Elizabeth II and John Paul II have more in common than might at first sight appear. Perhaps the two most experienced and public-spirited leaders in the world, each offers a refreshing contrast to the self-aggrandisement of mere politicians. Both are revered and indeed loved far beyond their own spheres, with an enduring popularity that has strengthened their respective institutions. Yet these two remarkable monarchs claim to hold their offices by the grace of God.
Some zealots could not contain their resentment of the Vatican. Prominent among them was Andreas Whittam Smith: son of an evangelical clergyman, founder of the Independent, and now president of the British Board of Film Classification. From his old pulpit, Mr Whittam Smith denounced the Pope's "breathtaking arrogance". Under the headline "Behind his smile, the Pope remains scornful of the English", his article suggested that John Paul II regards the present Queen in much the same light as Pius V did Elizabeth I when he excommunicated her in 1570.
The chief film censor, despite his job, is tolerant of almost any depravity on screen. Yet on the subject of the Pope, a man of conspicuous virtue, Mr Whittam Smith is censorious to the point of bigotry. He is the very model of the modern puritan.
~*~

Problem with Prince's regimental tie knot is unravelled(Electronic Telegraph)
By Tara Womersley

A PORTRAIT of the Prince of Wales was unveiled for the second time yesterday after the artist had to change the way his regimental tie was painted.
The painting shows Prince Charles wearing the Gordon Highlanders' tie but the original version showed it knotted with a yellow stripe, which goes against the regiment's tradition. He was not wearing the tie while sitting for the portrait and it was just before its first unveiling at the regiment's museum in Aberdeen in the presence of the Prince that the artist was told of his mistake.
Richard Stone, who has painted every member of the entire Royal family, said: "You could call it a knotty problem. The sittings lasted about an hour and because Prince Charles had to rush off for other engagements there was not the time for him to change clothes.
"A member of his staff gave me the tie and I thought it looked rather good with the yellow in the middle. The mistake was embarrassing at first. It only took a minute or so to fill in the yellow with black but I had to wait until I could return to Aberdeen to unveil it again."
Mr Stone, of Colchester, has provided the painting free to the independent museum and 350 limited edition prints are also being sold to raise money for the museum's upkeep.
It is unclear how the tradition of knotting the Gordon Highlanders' tie started. The regiment was formed in 1794 to deal with the French revolutionary wars and Prince Charles was its last Colonel-in-Chief before it was joined with the Queen's Own Highlanders six years ago.
The Prince of Wales visited the Strathisla distillery in Keith, yesterday - the home of Chivas Regal - and examined their whisky but resisted the temptation to taste it.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

To October News
To News Archive