NOTES:
1] 9:1 really belongs with this. God's Rule happens now
when we accept Jesus. 2] 'Son of Man' always has two thrusts: of
the earth, earthy; & of the heavens, supernatural. 3] What Jesus
says about the fate of the Son of Man runs contrary to the thinking
of his day about the Messiah. 4] 'Satan' originally meant one who
drew faults to God's notice, but changed to mean a being who opposed God.
5] In 35-6, the word usually translated 'life', or 'soul', means
life including the soul.
WARMING UP: What do we make of the fact that Hot + Buns have been in supermarkets since Christmas?
TREASURES OLD & NEW: Identify God at work in anything this week?
ENTERING INTO THE STORY:
31-33 Is it any easier to accept Jesus' teaching
about himself being the suffering, dying, raised Son of Man now, with hindsight,
than it was for disciples then? If we were 'explaining' Jesus to someone,
how would we justify following such a person? How do we? What if
a suffering Messiah just doesn't appeal to generations interested only
in 'winners'? Are we enthusiastic enough about his resurrection to convince
sceptics a) that Jesus IS a winner? b) that he makes us all 'winners'?
Do we ever 'do a Peter' & suggest to God there are other & better
ways of doing things? How can we be sure we really are 'seeing things God's
way'? Does insisting we do that make us into religious maniacs?
34-38 Which of the three demands that
Jesus makes here do we find most & least attractive? Would it be easier
to be a disciple if we could pick & choose between these three demands?
Or do we do that anyway? Would it make Christian faith easier for others
to accept if they could pick & choose? Is what Jesus asks of us realistic
in today's world? Which is more important to us: our life, or our soul?
Or can't we have one without the other?
Are we, in any sense, ashamed by, or at least embarrassed by Jesus &
his words? Do our churches give any impression of being either ashamed
or embarrassed? Does it occur to us / worry us that Jesus might be ashamed
of us when he appears as the supernatural Son of Man (as contrasted
with the earthly one)? Should it?
9:1 Have we seen, do we see,
do we expect to see God 'ruling in power'? What does that mean in practical
terms?
Preachers are invited to visit www.angelfire.com/journal2/marginallymark re this passage