OPTION 1: MT 2: 13-23
NOTES: 1] Read vv.1-12 to get the context. 2] An angel
(= 'messenger of God') may be a supernatural being or a mortal.
3] Herod the 'Great' (the Pits, actually!) stood for exactly
the opposite of what God expected of Hebrew kings. The story in v.16 is
totally in character with what we know of Herod. 4] MT expects his
readers to see the flight into Egypt & subsequent return is a microcosm
of the historic captivity in Egypt & Exodus from that land. 5] The
JER 31:15 passage quoted (v.18) refers to a massacre & deportation
by the Assyrians in 721BC. 6] Nazarene or Nazorean (23) may be a
misunderstanding of IS 4:3 where a similar word means 'holy', or
IS 11: 1 where the word is 'offshoot' (of David).
WARMING UP: Do we dream regularly / intermittently / vividly / confusedly.........?
TREASURES OLD & NEW: Identify God at work in anything that's happened since last week's Group?
EXPLORING GOSPEL:
13-15 Would we trust a dream to provide us
with insight into God's will today? How can we discern if someone, in dream
or actuality is a messenger of God, or a figment of our imagination? Does
God now expect us to use wisdom, common sense, insight, discernment, etc.,
more than dreams to see pitfalls & dangers ahead & either avoid
them (as here) or confront them? What's the difference between these various
'tools'? Are any more or less legitimate for Christians than others? In
the light of continuing revelations of sexual & other child abuse in
churches & the community, how does Joseph's firm & decisive act
of 'child protection' strike us a a model for our own generations?
Are we as conscious as we might be of the connections between stories
in the Hebrew Bible & their continuation / fulfilment in our Christian
New Testament? What use is it to us to find such connections as MT sees
here, & expects us to see, too, between NUM 23: 22, HOS 11:1, &
the 'flight into Egypt' story he's telling? Is there any sense in which
God may be calling us into or out of some 'Egypt'?
16-18 Given that Herod's calculations point
to Jesus being maybe two years old when the massacre occurs, does it matter
that this contradicts the commonly & erroneously held view that Jesus
was visited by the Magi as a baby? Do we really need to re-write the scripts
of our Christmas pageants? What about the growing militancy of the Politically
Correct Police who insist there should be no (public) Christmas pageants?
What eternal truth do we find in a) the visitation by the Magi; b) the
flight into Egypt; c) the massacre at Bethlehem; d) the return from Egypt?
Does a good story need to be literally true to have lasting meaning?
Are we as compassionate as we need to be towards those in our family, church,
wider community who lose a child through any circumastances at all? Do
we have Jesus' absolute loving commitment to children & 'little ones'
in general, or is the way we feel about them more a matter of sentiment?
19-23 Has anything in the last few verses changed
our thinking about the way we think about dreams & visions as ways
in which God might communicate with us today?
OPTION 2: ACTS 3: 1-26
This passage, or part thereof, is set for 3rd S. of
Easter in Yr. B
NOTES: 1] Try to get hold of a readable commentary on Acts, or at least follow the footnotes in the Bible you use. (Do use a version that has adequate footnotes.) 2] Would non-Jewish readers understand, let alone be convinced by Peter's case?
WARMING UP: Have we ever been part of an excited crowd?
TREASURES OLD & NEW: Identify God at work in anything that's happened this week?
EXPLORING ACTS:
1-10 Have we, as today's Christians
suffered, maybe, through prayers becoming mainly private, or with the church
on Sunday, rather than maintaining a discipline of 'praying through the
hours'? Is that really just for monastics? Is the whole idea just too hard
to maintain in a busy society like most of us live in? What might the pros
& cons of maintaining some form of daily prayer routine
with others
be? What expectations (of any kind) do those who observe us going to worship
have of us, if any? Is the kind of gift God gives this disabled man through
Peter & John out of the question today? Ought we be able to become
channels of such healing still, or is there more to it than that?
How good are we at 'walking & leaping & praising God' as a normal
part of expressing our faith? Or, is that kind of excitement best kept
for those, like the man in the story (let's call him Isaac) who experience
some great act of healing? Are even those who do experience some healing
like Isaac likely to respond as joyously as he does? Are we discerning
enough to realise that all our experiences, whether of illness, disability,
etc., or, on the other hand, healing, can be spiritual ones? Do wonder
& amazement play any part in our spirituality, or do we leave such
responses to 'extremists' & 'cranks'?
11-16 To whom, or to what do we cling (like Isaac clings to P & J?) Is this clinging a help or a hindrance to real faith & spirituality? Do we ever need to have spelled out for us (as P spells it out here for the crowd) that we can do nothing of our own power? In a world of ego-tripping, are we as upfront as we need to be about it being God's power that changes lives? What does it mean that God has 'glorified his servant Jesus'? What about our own glorifying of Jesus? Can we know what it is to glorify God / Jesus unless & until we become servants as totally as Jesus did? How do we become such a servant? Is there any mileage in 'Jew-bashing' over what happened so long ago? Is anti-semitism more the product of racial prejudice than religion? Are there any limits to what 'faith in (Jesus') name' can do for us today?
17-26 How often do we 'act in ignorance' about things
that really matter? Are we inclined to act more on 'head' information than
'heart' information? When head & heart aren't in agreement, where to
from there? How might Peter answer that?
Despite what P says about Jesus 'remaining in heaven...', wasn't discovering
Jesus among them in the Person of his Spirit what Acts is really
all about? Is the division we make between heaven & earth resolved
when we experience for ourselves that where God is (in any of his
Persons), there is heaven?
If, thanks to God's mercy, we know we're among 'all the families of the
earth blessed by God', how are we to relate to Jewish or other people who
have not accepted what P says here about the role Jesus plays in God's
plan for humankind? Is the kind of argument P uses likely to be persuasive
today, or is it more a matter of demonstrating the difference Jesus can
make in our lives?