In a stunning development in the death row case of Mumia Abu-Jamal, on Friday Mumia for the first
time publicly denied killing Philly cop Daniel Faulkner in 1981. Jamal's attorneys also released
an affadavit from the man who says he shot Faulkner - because the mob and crooked cops wanted
Faulkner executed for impeding police corruption.
On Friday, May 4, attorneys for radical journalist and death row inmate Mumia Abu-Jamal released
an affidavit from their client in which Mumia for the first time definitively denied any role in
the 1981 killing of Philadelphia police officer Daniel Faulkner. Mumia's statement marks the first
time he has publicly spoken out about details of what occurred the night Faulkner was killed.
"I never confessed to anything because I had nothing to confess to," Mumia states in his
affidavit. "I never said I shot the policeman. I did not shoot the policeman. I never said I hoped
he died. I would never say something like that." Police have asserted that Mumia shouted, "I shot
the mother fucker and I hope he dies," after he was brought to the hospital for treatment for a
gunshot wound that occurred at the scene of the incident - a charge Mumia's affidavit flatly
refutes.
Mumia's statement, dated May 3, was accompanied by an affidavit that Jamal's brother William Cook
provided in late April, in which Cook also for the first time definitively denied that either he or
Mumia played any role in Faulkner’s death. Cook's affidavit also states that he would have been willing
to step forward on Mumia's behalf much earlier, in both 1999 and at Mumia's post conviction relief
proceedings in 1995, if he'd been asked by Mumia's former legal team.
On Friday, Mumia's attorneys also released a 1999 affidavit from Arnold Beverly, who alleges that
he played a role in the assassination of Faulkner - shooting Faulkner in the face - and which also
asserts that Mumia played no role in Faulkner's killing. In his statement, Beverly asserts that
Faulkner had been targeted by the mob and crooked Philly cops for execution because he'd "interfered
with the graft and payoffs made to allow illegal activity including prostitution, gambling, drugs
without prosecution in the center city area."
"Mumia Abu-Jamal was in the wrong place at the wrong time when a hit was in progress on a police
officer who was causing problems interfering with police corruption," Los Angeles lawyer Eliot Lee
Grossman, a member of Mumia's new legal team, told the Philadelphia Inquirer on May 4.
Mumia's public pronouncement of his innocence, along with the release of the Cook and Beverly
affidavits and additional information attesting to rampant corruption on the Philly police department at
the time, is expected to intensify international pressure for a new trial in the case. Mumia has garnered
support from groups and individuals that range from Hollywood luminaries to European trade unions.
Supporters are planning to convene a ‘Free Mumia Encampment’ in front of Philadelphia’s city hall
beginning Friday, May 11, with major demonstrations planned in Philadelphia and other cities on May
12 as part of an international day of solidarity with Mumia.
"This information represents the first accurate accounting of what really happened on December 9,
1981," says Tracy Kostenbader of the Chicago Committee to Free Mumia Abu-Jamal, who"s been
working on Mumia’s case since 1991. "These affidavits from Mumia and his brother represent
statements of fact, based on their recollection of what happened that night nearly 20 years
ago - not a theory or a fabrication. We plan to fight like hell to see that the truth prevails."
Mumia fired his long-time attorneys Leonard Weinglass, Dan Williams, and the rest of his legal
team in early March of this year, after Mumia learned in late February that Williams planned to
publish an 'inside account' of the case. According to press reports, both Weinglass and Williams
have declined to elaborate on why they chose not to use Beverly's June 1999 affidavit, which prosecutors
have vigorously derided as a 'fabrication.'
Mumia's new legal team - Grossman, Marlene Kamish of Chicago, British barrister Nick Brown of
London, and J. Michael Farrell of Philadelphia - filed Notices of Appearance with the U.S. district
court on Friday, effectively granting them formal standing as Mumia's new legal team. Reports and
rumors have circulated for years that Faulker's killing may have been related to a mob hit or police
corruption. But Mumia's new legal team is clearly less reticent than his former attorneys in openly
pressing forward with this new accounting of Faulkner’s shooting - and with public pronouncements
from Mumia and Cook that attest to Mumia's innocence.
Despite prosecutors' claims to the press that Beverly’s affidavit is 'ridiculous,' the Philadelphia police
department's long tradition of corruption and criminal wrongdoing remains undisputed. Hundreds of
criminal prosecutions were reversed and the city of Philadelphia was forced to pay out millions of
dollars in settlements in the wake of a police scandal that broke in 1995. Charges of police wrongdoing
related to the scandal date back at least a decade prior to 1995, with civilians alleging police
wrongdoing that ranged from coerced confessions and planted evidence to assault and torture. In
December of 2000, public debate on the topic erupted again nationally when an ABC helicopter crew
released video tape showing Philadelphia police beating and kicking a suspect accused of shooting a
police officer and stealing a police car. Relatives of the beating victim, 30-year-old Thomas Jones,
have hotly contested official versions of the incident, arguing that Jones did not fire a gun and fled only
because police were beating him. Philadelphia police brutality opponents have charged that the 1995
police corruption scandal and Jones' beating underscore a decades-long pattern of police lawlessness
and abuse.
In the meantime, Mumia's stay of execution remains in place while he and his legal team await a ruling
from U.S. District Judge William H. Yohn Jr. on whether Mumia will be granted new evidentiary
hearings. Yohn could choose instead to decide the appeal based on Mumia's trial and appeals records
in the state courts, which legal experts and his supporters have charged were deeply flawed.
Mumia has argued that his constitutional rights were violated during both his 1982 trial before Common
Pleas Judge Albert F. Sabo and in a 1995 state post-conviction appeal hearing over which Sabo also
presided. Sabo has been widely criticized by human rights activists for what they assert is an
egregious record of pro-police bias, earning him the moniker of 'king of death row' for his record of
sentencing more defendants to death than any other sitting judge in the nation. Sabo served as
Philadelphia's undersheriff for 16 years before being elected to the bench.
For more information about the May 11-13 Free Mumia Encampment in Philadelphia,
contact:
Int'l Concerned Family & Friends of Mumia Abu-Jamal: 215-476-8812
International Action Center: 212-633-6646
Free Mumia Coalition: 212-330-8029
Refuse & Resist: 212-713-5657
For more info and pdf file of leaflet, go to: www.iacboston.org