Will these new Anti-Terrorist bills, with
their many changes to the nation's current surveillance laws, prevent future terrorist attacks or aid
in capturing Osama bin Laden?
It's doubtful.
Even with the Feds working around the clock monitoring communication lines, they still haven't been
able to locate him. Why? According to U.S. intelligence, Osama bin Laden is evading detection because
he is NOT using any form of modern hi-tech communications equipment. "He switched off a lot of
communications technologies," a US intelligence spokesman said. "Now it is other people talking for
him. In an innocuous conversation, you can't pick that out."
In spite of the fact, Congress is under the impression that increased and unfettered surveillance
-- such as using Carnivore
to monitor all Internet communications or allowing for unrestricted wiretaps -- is the only solution
to stopping people like bin Laden. But if he's now using human messengers and family members to physically
communicate his instructions, exactly how effective will law enforcement and its expanded surveillance
powers be?
If future terrorists "display the adaptibility, patience and savage will that these hijackers did,"
and are able to render obsolete all our surveillance technologies and the billions spent on them,
these Anti-Terrorist bills will have only succeeded in eliminating some of our most cherished and
essential liberties.
We've travelled down this road before, but only to look back in amazement at how stupid we were,
that we could have so easily cast aside our freedoms. Personally, I'd rather die free than live in
shackles.