Guilty Until Proven Innocent How many
wrongs till Kirstin gets her rights? Wrongly convicted by a "confession" involving a completely different incident - on a completely
different date - in a completely different part of town – with completely different scenarios and different description
- Passed 3 separate polygraph tests verifying she did NOT commit the crime
- No forensic or physical evidence linking accused to the crime
- Eyewitness testimony and phone records prove accused was in a different town and nowhere near the scene at the time of the crime – one eyewitness passed polygraph test proving truth of testimony
- A police detective pre-determined the accused was guilty and refused to listen to new facts because "he already had the right person in custody"
- Prosecution shows extremely weak case – offer of plea bargain of only 3 years in prison in exchange for a capital murder conviction
- Financial limitations prevent accused from getting experienced and expert legal defense
- A seasoned Prosecutor overwhelms an inexperienced Public Defender
- Public Defender filing error prevents key defense forensic witness testimony from being presented at trial
- Prosecution obtains jailhouse "snitch" hearsay testimony that is an obvious attempt by witness to get leniency in her own criminal case; facts surrounding this witness and testimony never presented to jury
- Prosecutorial comments made in open court reveal prejudices against the accused because of her lifestyle and place of residence
- Legal system repeatedly uses defendant's alleged drug use to cover numerous and vast discrepancies in a confession to one thing and a conviction for something else – despite accused's 100% drug free blood and
urine test results
This incredible true story reveals how a bizarre combination of multiple misconceptions, inconsistent but vaguely coincidental occurrences, unjust
prejudices and an inexperienced, inept legal defense compound to turn a justice system designed to protect and preserve rights into a real-life horror story |