Dear Muslims:

Who in their right or wrong mind would want to be a kafir - disbeliever in Islamic
monotheism?

In this issue, we have attempted to cover some of the main issues of our times, but
what about remembering similar times played out by those before us. It seems that
the mushriks and pagens are once again using propoganda to prevent the Muslims
from understanding Allah's punishment of the people in the past. And too many
Muslims today are actually defending these unholy people with twisted
interpretations and understanding of Allah's ayats in Al-Qur'an and Authentic
Hadiths. Some have even distanced themselves from other Muslims, which was not
the way of the Sahaaba. The Sahaaba loved Muslims and hated Mushriks, were
compassionate toward the believer and harsh against the disbeliever, kind toward
his brother and demanded jizyah and submission from his enemy. So what about
today?

We see what the west is all about with the recent exposure of their "Wonderland
Club". These kuffar who have sex with little babies as young as 3 months old are
only following the footsteps of their pagen ancestors who worshipped the Moon,
the Stars, man-made idols and other things. They were warned by all of the
Messenger Prophets; Dawood (AS), Ibrahim (AS), Musa (AS), Isa (AS) and
Muhammad (SAW). But they still continue to be rebellious against Allah and His
creation. What about the Muslims today?

Instead of increasing the talk of jihad and support for the Muhajir and Mujahidin
who are the fighters that protect Allah's creation, by His permission and safeguard
the children and their mothers by Allah's permission, too many Muslims runand hide
from man-made laws as if it will be equivalent to the punishment of Allah. When
our brothers, the Taliban announce they are going to destroy the statues and idols
in the Islamic Emirate, the Muslims are either not sure of their actions, speak out
against them and help the mushriks or don't care.

We are at war with those who want us to live wrong and worship others besides
Allah. It is only a matter of time when the world will enter into its third world war,
and this could happen anytime Allah pleases. The Muslims in the West may not be
able to make hijrah or go to the frontline to save our women and children from
these animals who some of them, claim Allah is three; Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
They are filthy scum of the earth and Allah says about these kuffar, they are
beneath the level of the cattle.

So now it is time to make your decision. Be like the kuffar or be like the Sahaaba
(RA)? Make hijrah or stay amongst these filthy people with your families, wives,
and children and become like them? Fight or run and hide? Love Allah and his
Mujahidin or prefer the dajjal and the kuffar?

BUDDAH RECEIVES WARNING;
Statues Defaced by Taliban

As Prophet Ibrahim (AS) destroyed the statues of his time, and other Prophets did
the same, Prophet Muhammad (SAW) destroyed the statues in the Kabah.

The Taliban, following the Shariah laid down by Allah, have destroyed this large
statue. They did this on the orders of the Amir ul-Mu'mineen in the Islamic Emirate
of Aghanistan.

Ever so often a movement comes along that is indeed so grand and great that even
proponents of the aims of the movement oppose it. The case in our minds is that of
the Taliban, the ruling movement of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.

In a message to the public, Amir Muhammad 'Umar announced that the pre-Islamic
Buddhist statues dominating many areas of the skyline in Afghanistan would be
destroyed.

The decision of the amir has brought world consternation and hatred and enmity
from even other 'Islamic' countries. However, the Taliban remain vigilant. Some of
the common Muslims also seem ready to condemn the defenders of the Shari'a.

But before we climb up the mountain of scholarship and take down our English
translation of Sahih alBukhaari and the Noble Qur'an from the book shelf, we need
to consider the reasoning for the Taliban's decision.

The Taliban government and the madhhab of the state is the Hanafi madhhab,
which has some very strong evidences for their position. Therefore, it is prudence
to consider their points before we go into histrionics and diatribes.

It is known from the Hanafi madhhab regarding this issue that they take a firm
stance. Indeed all of the madhaahib take a firm stance, but the Hanafiyyah tend to
be the most strict. But in regards to idols and the like, the Hanafiyyah take the
stance from the Messenger (SAW) regarding this issue.

Upon conquering Makkah in the year 9 AH (630 AD) two years before his death
in 12 AH (632 AD), the Prophet (SAW) addressed the idols. With a stick in his
hand and poking the idols with a stick, he recited the verses, 'The truth has come
and falsehood has vanished. And falsehood is bound to vanish,' Surat ulIsraa,' ayah
81

Not long after that, to the fear of the Makkan populace about what omens would
occur at this event, the Prophet (SAW) dashed to the ground and smashed every
single idol that was in sight.

When all was concluded, 360 idols lay in a myriad of pieces, wrecked and
desolate. The people, after entering into Islam en masse, began the clean up of
what was now the ashes of their shameful history. The idols, they now knew, had
no power. Just useless superstition. They then understood that Islam is the truth,
not the darkness of idol worship.

This was our Messenger (SAW), the idol smasher, the defacer of images. The
same thing occured before he returned to Makkah victorious. At one point, he
found a picture inside of the Ka'ba of Ibrahim and Ismail (AS) using divining
arrows to which he said,

'May Allah curse these people! What is wrong with them. Ibrahim and Ismail never
used divining arrows.' All of this can easily be accessed in the Sirah of Ibn Hisham,
Sirah of Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Ishaaq (RHM) and many others.

This is how the Prophet (SAW) dealt with idol worship and all of of the evils that
surrounded it. Idols received no respect nor historical acceptance, no matter how
ancient their sacriligious superstition was in precedent.

The Sahaaba (RAA) also adopted the same attitude without precedent. Upon the
entry of Amr ibn al'Aas (RAA) and the other Sahaaba (RAA) into Egypt, the
pyramids were left to continue to delapidate. They were left to be eaten alive by the
silicon and burning stearic acid in the Egyptian sand.

There was not even the slightest passing respect given to them. They were left.
Some, such as the Sphinx, suffered some defacing from the Muslims. There was no
love shown to these images of idolatry.

The tombs were filled with sand and the old burial sites and symbols of falsehood
were defaced, to be forgotten and obfuscated from history. The same occured in
Algeria.

The arcades and Roman architecture were knocked down and lay mocked, in
pieces on the ground only to be forgotten by those whom the Messenger (SAW)
sent to spread Islam. The same was to occur in Tunisia, Libya, Indonesia and also
Maldives.

Infact, to this day, archaelogists are still finding smashed idols buried in mass
graves. When asked if they want to know about their previous culture, the people
of Maldives reply with a firm no. What's more, they are even ignorant of their own
idolatrous past.

Foreign archaeologists are the only ones who line the shores of Maldives, searching
for a history and past that the people of Maldives are as interested in as Jews are in
Third Reich philosophy.

Another strong example of Islamic hatred for idols came with Abu Sufyaan (RAA).
This man, a former idol worshipper, demolished the very idol in Taa'if that he used
to pay homage to in the past.

Indeed the people weeped in Taa'if. It was the end of an era, the love that they had
for the idol. But not long after, Taa'if would become a stronghold of Islam. Along
with Makkah and Madinah, Taa'if was one of the few places that did not apostate
during the great falling away after the death of the Messenger (SAW).

Unfortunately, it is only Afghanistaan who is remembering this message to the idols
and implementing the sunna regarding statues and other images paying homage to
false gods.

Other 'Islamic' countries have now opened up their borders and invested in
restoration of these houses of shirk and falsehood in order to draw in the
sustenance that Allah has withheld from them due to their refusal to implement the
Divine Shari'a.

This is why we should then be careful when we criticise people for things that we
do not understand. But soon after, those with the English translation of the Qur'an
will show us two ayaat that require an answer.

The first one will be,

'There is no compulsion in religion. The truth stands clear from falsehood,' Surat
ulBaqarah, ayah 256.

However, the ayah is not talking about idols. The ayah is making reference to a
man who was forced to leave Christianity against his will. This ayah in all books of
tafsir is in reference to forcing people to become Muslim from the people of the
Book.

Indeed we cannot force them, but they must live under the Shari'a discipline. This
involves not calling to their religion in public and not holding their festivals in public.

Therefore, we should not use this ayah as a proof against defacing idols, for
defacing idols is about defining truth from falsehood, as the Prophet (SAW) was
providing us with the tafsir for that ayah when he recited it while smashing the idols.

The next ayah that some well wishers to the kuffar might use is the following,

'For had it not been that Allah checks one people with another, monasteries,
churches, synagogues and masaajid, where the name of Allah is mentioned much
would have surely been pulled down...' Surat ulHajj, ayah 40

Once again, this ayah is a great bounty, but it does not fit the context of what we
are making reference to in this sitting. This is in reference to the actual buildings,
which in an Islamic state are protected from demolition in most cases.

However, according to some of the fuquhaa', the practitioners of these false
religions are not allowed to build new houses of worship, based on the ayah quoted
at the beginning of the article.

Secondly, as we looked into the first ayah, this one is also a general ayah.
Therefore, this ayah cannot be used as an evidence for the specific way that the
Prophet (SAW) dealt with idols.

This is due to the rule of Usul ulFiqh quoted by Shaikh ulIslam Ibn Qudaamah
(RH), 'We do not flee from the specific to the general,' AlMughni, V. 1. Thus, we
cannot leave what we know from the ayah quoted above to some general ayaat
and explanation used by some well wishers to the kuffar.

As far as the story of the Prophet (SAW) seeing a picture of the Virgin Mary and
the Messiah inside of the Ka'aba and sparing it, it is fabricated and not accepted
from the scholars of Sirah and hadith.

Thus, it does not stand as an evidence due to its' fabrication. And even if it wasn't,
according to the rules of Usul ulFiqh, it still could not be used, due to the rule, 'The
action cannot take precedence over a clear statement with action.'

This rule is the reason why we cover our thigh as nakedness, even though the
Prophet (SAW) bore his on the ride back from the Khaibar campaign. We get our
evidence that it is haraam due to the fact that the Prophet (SAW) said in an
authentic hadith, 'The thigh is from the nakedness,' Sahih ulJaami'a, classified as
sahih.

Therefore, those who are mourning the loss of the idols, be they kaafir or Muslim,
by the hands of the Taliban should heed this message. Those who are not Muslims
should think intelligently and choose between idols that don't speak and their Lord
who will speak to them on the Day of Resurrection and ask why they did not serve
Him, but instead, some dead idol.

Those who are Muslims should take warning from defending or loving the kuffar
who worship idols and make fun of not only Islam, but Allah in the process. Let this
ayah be a remainder to those good Samaritans who defend the kuffar and debate
on their behalf,

'And it has already been sent down to you in the Book that when you hear the signs
of Allah being disbelieved in or mocked at, then do not sit with them until they
change the subject.

'And if you stay with them, then you are like them. Surely, Allah will gather the
hypocrites and the unbelievers in the fire together,' Surat un-Nisaa', ayah 140.

Beware of defending or even speaking on behalf of kufr. For with one word you
come into Islam and with one word you leave Islam.

BIOGRAPHY OF ASH-SHU'AIBI
Inheritors of the Prophets

There are few scholars that have brought as much attention in recent years. There is
the fatwa of Shaikh Ibn Baz which brought either condemnation or sympathy for
the one who passed it.

There is the fatwa of Shaikh Muhammad ibn Ibrahim (RH) that cursed man-made
law and declared those who scraped the Shari'a as kuffar. And now in this time,
we come to the fatwa of one, Shaikh Hamud al'Uqlaa' ash-Shu'aibi.

This imaam has shocked much of the world by providing an answer to a pressing
question regarding the Shari'a today. But what we would like to do first is cover
some of his personal life first.

The shaikh is three years younger than the late 88 year old Shaikh Ibn Baz of the
Peninsula, and unlike Ibn Baz who was based in Riyaadh, Shaikh ash-Shu'aibi is
based in the region of Buraydah in the alQasim district.

The Shaikh has a long history of speaking the truth and is of the same calibre in
greatness as Shaikh Ibn Baz and Shaikh 'Uthaimin.

He was given and taught about Islam in the Burayda area, which has strong links to
the Najd, the area where many of the strongholds of truthful 'ulama and Mujaahidin
are housed.

In the early 1990's, it was only Shaikh 'Abdullah ibn 'Abdur-Rahmaan ibn alJibrin,
Shaikh Salmaan ibn Fahd al'Awdah, Shaikh Safar ibn 'Abdur-Rahmaan alHawaali,
Shaikh Naasir ibn Sulaimaan al'Umar and other un-named scholars who were
supporting the Mujaahidin of Afghanistaan.

Indeed, there were other scholars who were supporting the jihaad of the 1980's
against the Russians. But these were government scholars, and they were only
speaking the language of the regime when they were told to support the jihaad in
Afghanistaan.

Their support, may Allah curse them, was not based on support for jihaad and
Islam, but based on support for the policy of the United States against the
communism of the Soviet Union.

The 'ulama above and some unmentioned scholars were the only ones with the
strength to support the Taliban movement that swept over Afghanistaan in the early
1990's. For by now, the 'noble Mujaahidin' had fallen out of favour with the West
after they had been used to annihilate the Soviet regime.

And one of those unmentioned scholars was Shaikh ash-Shu'aibi. With the same
bravery that alJibrin has, when asked in his fataawa about sending money to the
Taliban movement, he replied with a resounding yes.

Then came the sweeping arrests in 1995 that resulting in the detaining of some
1500 'ulama, one of which was Shaikh Hamud al'Uqlaa' ash-Shu'aibi. After his
release, he would be arrested repeatedly, in an attempt to silence the near rebellion
that had been started in the Buraydah region.

This rebellion had been brought to fruition by one of his students, Shaikh Salmaan
ibn Fahd al'Awdah. Upon proclaiming the corruption of the government of the
Peninsula, al'Awdah called for sweeping changes. These demands were met by the
goverment with viciousness.

Arrests followed and the lives of the scholars were disrupted. But the difference
between the cowards and the scholars is that the scholars continued the struggle.
Shaikh ash-Shu'aibi continued on speaking the truth, irrespective of the odds.

Thus from 1998 on, Buraydah became a spot of focus for those who would rebel
against the kufr of the Saud regime and ash-Shu'aibi would become a spokesman
for the 'ulama of the Peninsula demanding the implementation of the Shari'a.

But what sparked the interest in him in the alJihaad this month is his stance
regarding the Taliban movement which he has been so unwavering towards in
support. The Shaikh was asked a series of questions regarding the Taliban
movement.

And as the Shaikh is long known for his wisdom and quick wit, he answered them
with sharpness. His fatwa was delivered in the month of Ramadan. When speaking
of the government of the Taliban, he explained,

'The Taliban regime in Afghanistaan has been proven to fulfil these factors, so it is
the ONLY country in the World in which there are no man-made laws and
legislations.

'Rather, indeed its' legislation is established on the Shari'a of Allah and His
Messenger in the Courts of Law, in the ministries, in the government circles and
other establishments.'

This statement sent a shockwave of amazement through the Peninsula. For although
we from the outside know that it is a kaafir regime, many of the people in the
Peninsula have been raised to believe that it is the only Shari'a state, whereas the
Shaikh has said that only the Taliban regime is the Islamic state.

The support that the Shaikh has given to the Taliban is indeed great and may Allah
reward him for that. But may Allah also strengthen him to handle the oppression
and possible arrest for saying the statements that he is saying. For no one speaks
the truth from the 'ulama except that there is someone there waiting to harm him.

When speaking of the humans rights policy of the Taliban regime in Afghanistaan,
the 'aalim responded with the following,

'Indeed it is the ONLY country in the World which is striving for women's rights
according to the Shari'a and not according to the ways of the Secularists who
encourage the women to display their beauty, cast off their hijaabs, mix freely with
men, drive cars alone and other things like that.

'It is the ONLY country in the World which has a separate ministry by the name of
the Ministry to Encourage Good and Forbid Evil.

'To conclude… Just as we pray for the Taliban Government for ability and
guidance from Allah, we also appeal to them to remain firm and steadfast upon
these aforementioned great Islamic qualities and to hold fast to the Book of Allah
(SWT), the Sunna of His Messenger (SAW) and the ways of the Salafus-Saalih
(Pious Predecessors) and that they do not worry about pressure and intimidation
from the disbelieving countries and others like them.'

Not only is the fatwa of the Shaikh a slap in the face to the people who are not
supporting the truth of the Taliban movement, it also bolsters support for the
Taliban and those who fought to try to establish what the Taliban now have.

People such as Shaikh 'Umar 'Abdur-Rahmaan, Shaikh 'Abdullah 'Azzaam (RH),
Shaikh Usaamah ibn Laadin and many other jama'aat and organisations may all
take solace in the fact that they have not been forgotten and that there are indeed
'ulama who are not ashamed of the Shari'a, but are willing to bear the struggle in
supporting it.

Shaikh Hamud al'Uqlaa' ash-Shu'aibi now remains an enemy to the regime in the
Arabian Peninsula and the other regimes that are paid to remain silent on the Shari'a
that is being implemented. We pray for the safety of the Shaikh and that one day he
might be allowed to leave so that he might live out the rest of his days in the Islamic
state.

And may Allah bless all of the other 'ulama who have bled and passed fataawa to
protect the honour of the Mujaahidin in general and the Taliban in particular. Amin.

ISLAMIC JIHAD IN INDONESIA;
Tears and Fears for the Unholy Coming

When the economic collapse came with the advent of George Sauros, the
inhabitants of Indonesia thought that this would be the largest of their worries. If
only this were the case.

Unfortunately, it was just the beginning. The horror intensified with the rise of ethnic
troubles in East Timor. This trouble came from those Christian inhabitants on the
island that were now demanding their own state, with U.S. blessing of course.

The Indonesians, with the nationalism that the government had infused them with,
would not allow this action. This is when the Timor people exacted a terrible
vengeance. Masjids in many locations came under attack.

Rapes and attacks on Muslim women were used to show that the Timorese were
serious about their claims. But the Indonesians retaliated with the attacks on the
Timor people.

But the heat of jihaad did not become apparent until recently. The problems that
exist currently in Indonesia are part of a long standing condition. If possible, the
condition can be compared to that of Andalus (Spain).

It may be befitting to compare and then observe the similarities between the two.
Both of these nations were taken by the Mujaahidin, one by the Mujaahidin more
than 50 years after the death of Muhammad (SAW) and another more than 100
years after the death of Muhammad (SAW).

Both of them had strong Islamic teachings implemented immediately, with Andalus
(Spain) being mostly Maaliki in madhhab and Indonesia being mostly Shaafi'ii in
madhhab.

In a short period of time, Islam became the dominant culture and system in both
locations. The Arabic alphabet took root and the system of zakah was
implemented relentlessly. Science and mathematics thrived in both countries.

But while all seemed beautiful, the seeds of unmindfulness began to take root. With
all of the intermarriage there began to be too much sympathy for the Christians and
Jews in Spain, whereas the case with Indonesia was the Christians, Chinese,
Buddhists and Jews.

The Hindus in Indonesia had long been peacefully paying jizyah. They also lived on
the island of Bali, which was a far location from the big islands where most of the
amirs were based and where most of the ruling was taking place.

But in both countries, despotism and nepotism began to be the order of the day.
Both of them began to lose sight of jihaad, with soft, obese rulers using the position
of leadership like that of a dynasty. These emirates then became kingdoms.

They would both witness Islamic revivals by their scholars, but some of the poison
had already sunk in too deep. One of the worst poisons was that of Christianity.
Left far too long without paying jizyah, the Christians became haughty and
rebellious.

This was when the Christians of Spain decided to contact Tomas De Torquemada,
perhaps the strongest authority of that time on Roman Catholicism. The same tactic
took place with the Timorese contacting Pope John Paul II for direction.

The Christians of both lands asked for permission to declare a war of the cross in
their lands and to purify them of the 'Islamic scourge' and both received permission.
The Christians of Spain started by inviting the Christians of Byzantium, Iran and
Iraq to come and help for the cause of Christ.

'Come out,' they shouted, 'And risk your life for your religion.' The Christians of
Indonesia did the same, only they invited the Dutch in the late 1800's to come into
the islands.

When the Christian warlords arrived, they found, with the exception of a small
band of 'ulama and Mujaahidin a mostly opulent and decadent social class of
people ruling who could barely defend themselves.

The Christians went to work, leveling the countryside. In Andalus, it started in
Gharnata (what is today called Granada). In Indonesia, it started in Jakarta and
some of the locations in Timor.

The Muslims were very quickly dethroned from power in both countries due to
their weakness. One of the first signs of Christian dominance was the desecration
of AlHambra and the removal of the Qur'an as the ultimate source of law in the
country. In Indonesia, it was the destruction of some of the long standing masaajid
with desecration of SEVERAL Qur'ans.

While the war of the cross continued in both countries, there was so much
internecine warfare between Muslims that they did not have the ability to form a
cohesive battle strategy. This resulted in the Muslims losing more ground than
gaining and having to go on the defensive rather than offensive.

The final measure was the consolidation, which has only happened in Andalus
(today's Spain). After consolidation, the masaajid were all razed to the ground.
Near 1 million people were deported in 1685 AD and hundreds of thousands
feared dead.

The Christians were in such a frenzy over their victory, that they actually dug up the
bodies of whatever dead Muslims were there and tortured and mutilated them as
well.

The end result of today's Spain is that authentic Islam has been all but obliterated
from the landscape. Indeed there are small bands of people coming back to Islam.
But without following the methodology of the Prophet (SAW) in bringing countries
to Islam (jihaad), the converts remain small and constantly tempted to travel back
down the road to kufr.

Today, the occupation in Spain is over, as it officially belongs to Christians and
Christianity. Islam has become nothing more than folk religion and history there.

The consolidation process in Indonesia is already halfway complete, looking
historically.

In Indonesia, what has actually occured was on primetime Indonesian television,
Christians videotaped themselves eating Muslim flesh, chewing on Muslim heads
and planting severed Muslim heads on posts.

This is comparable to the Christians digging up the graves of Muslims in Spain to
mutilate them. The question now is, what path will the people take now that the
jihaad has intensified?

Will they meet the same fate as Spain, a nation that will only have Islam in their
history books or as some dirty secret to be hidden?

Will the Indonesians forget the driving force that made them great and collapse
under international pressure? Or will there be long term civil war as in Yemen
without a clear victor?

The most sincere hope, insha'allah, is that the people of Indonesia defend
themselves and that they resist the onslaught of foreign ideas. If they stand firm as a
united block, Allah (SWT) will assist them, for He has said,

'Truly, Allah loves those that fight in His cause in well ordered ranks as if they were
a solid structure,' Surat us-Saff, ayah 4.

Insha'allah, the people of Indonesia will unite under the banner of Allah, throw off
the tyranny of their secularist rulers and re-establish the Shari'a that blessed their
shores so very long ago.

And may Allah help His blessed soldiers in every location and endeavour.

THE PLAGUES TO COME;
Fierce Punishment From Allah

At last count, there are over 30 cases of foot and mouth disease. This disease has
caused damage to the countryside in such a way that over 30,000 animals have had
to be burned in an attempt to control the spread of the disease.

But the disease has actually spread further than anyone could have realised. Even
with the burnings, the disease has continued to multiply and spread dramatically.

The last outbreak was with the mad cow disease. This disease come to the
Germans and made it to other nations as well. In 1967 there was an outbreak in
Britain and all over the country, animals had to be killed and burned.

Now the latest outbreak has come. But how has it come? The latest outbreak in
specifics has come due to the housing of pigs with sheep, chicken and cows. Pigs,
as it is known, carry quite a few diseases but they do not show them. They merely
pass it along.

This is why in China, many of the people suffer from kidney failure and other
diseases from the pig. Although they cannot get it directly from the pig, they get it
indirectly from the chicken that they eat.

The chickens in many parts of China are housed next to the pigs and they eat the
faeces of the pigs that falls in the hay as nourishment. This waste has the diseases
that circulate through the pigs body. These chickens are slaughtered and eaten,
without the people understanding that they are eating contaminated meat.

In the United Kingdom, pigs are stored in the same facilities as sheep and cows.
What this does is that it exposes the other animals to the diseases of the swine,
which they had never seen before.

The pig displays normal signs of health, as he is only a conduit of the disease. But
upon observation of the sheep and cows housed with them, one finds pustules and
sores on the face and feet of the animal. This leads to other complications and in
some cases death.

This disease is also capable of being transmitted to human beings. This is the
problem that the scientists are faced with at the moment. And it is the precise
reason why so many animals are being destroyed to stop the spread of this disease.

In spite of all of their caution, the disease has reared its' head in Britain, Ireland,
Germany, France and Scotland. We were awaiting to hear about it coming from
the Peninsula, but our wait was not long. Contaminated meat struck in the Arabian
Peninsula not long ago.

Foot and mouth has ceased being an outbreak and is now an epidemic. In many
parts of Britain, people have been forbidden from going through the countryside.
Traffic has been detoured and people have been inconvenienced upon their trip to
the supermarket.

They have had to buy meat that is expensive and there is no guarantee that it is safe
from the epidemic. This remains to date the worst epidemic to strike the industry,
as the countryside and farmers are on the brink of
economic collapse.

As we mentioned, indeed this is the specific reason for the foot and mouth
outbreak. But the general is far more frightening. The reason in general is from the
curse of Allah and the prophecies of the Messenger of Allah (SAW).

He mentioned in regards to a 'disease that no Arab house would escape that is like
the sickness that effects sheep,' Collected by Imaam alBukhaari and classified as
sahih.

Could this be the time that this hadith could be fulfilled? Could this be
the time when this epidemic will spread worldwide? Will this year be the
year of widespread poisoning of our meat supply?

With the direction that things are heading in, it would certainly appear
that this may be the year for the fulfillment of this hadith. With every new
day, there is another case or set of cases of the epidemic, which threatens to
swallow the way of life of people in the country and jeopardise our very food
supply.

All of this not only warns us of the hadith, but also of the dangers of
housing unclean animals with animals that are clean. As we mentioned above, this
comes due to the mixing and integration of all of these animals
together in one complex.

To the thinking man, it could only be the case that this tragedy would take place
due to unsanitary and unacceptable housing for the animals in the first place.

The ultimate outcome of this has yet to be seen, as only time will tell how
awful and just how widespread this disaster will become. May Allah protect the
Muslims from the evil of whatever the kuffar have brought upon themselves with
their own hands.

THE DANGERS OF GHIBA;
An Overlooked Major Sin

Of all of the horrific sins, we usually think of worshipping idols, drinking
alcohol, committing fornication, committing adultery and many other things when
we think of major sins.

But we do not think of one of the major sins that is overlooked in this
time. The one overlooked in this time has destroyed much of the good in the
conversation of people and many base their whole careers on it.

Others do it without paying any mind to this most underestimated of all of
the major sins. What makes things worse is that it is seen as harmless by so many
people in the Ummah.

Few people in the times of Imaam Ibn Taymiyyah, Imaam Ibn Kathir, Imaam Badr
ud-Din al'Aini (RHM) and the imaams before would have thought that ghiba would
have been taken so lightly in the years to come.

But indeed it has been taken to be something that is a necessary part of
conversation, to the point where Allah (SWT) is forgotten and the
conversation becomes nothing more than meaningless prattle.

Allah has warned us about wasting time in this manner when he said,

'And do not spy or backbite (ghiba) one another. Would anyone of you love to eat
the dead flesh of his brother? You would hate it, so have fear of Allah for He is the
Forgiving, the Merciful,' Surat ulHujuraat, ayah 12.

But when we read this ayah, we might be wondering, 'What exactly is ghiba? How
do we know what it is, for everyone knows what spying is, but what exactly is
ghiba.

The description of ghiba has been given by none other than the Prophet (SAW)
himself. The Sahaaba (RAA) were gathered in front of him one day as narrated by
Abu Huraira (RAA) when the Messenger of Allah posed the following query,

'Do you know what ghiba is?'

They (the Sahaaba) said, 'Allah and His Messenger know best.'

He [the Messenger (SAW)] said, 'It is that you mention about your brother what
he dislikes.'

Then it was said, 'What if what that which is said about my brother is as
what I say?'

He (SAW) said, 'If what you say is in him (the statement is true), then you have
done ghiba to him (you have back bitten him) and if what you said of him is not
present in him, then you have slandered (buhtaan) him,' Narrated in Imaam Muslim
and classified as sahih.

Thus from this simple hadith we can see that the two acts, be they
backbiting or slandering, they are both wrong and unacceptable. But if this is the
case, why does it still continue? Why? It is due to the fact that the beginning of the
hadith is ignored.

In explanation of the hadith, Imaam an-Nawawi (RH) had this to say about ghiba,

'Ghiba is mentioning in the person's absence what he would dislike.'

Many have come to think of ghiba in the sense that only if it is false
speech about the person does it actually become wrong. This is a false
conception. For the Prophet (SAW) mentioned in the above hadith that even if
what the person backbiting has alleged was true, the person has still done ghiba.

The following hadith should suffice as ample evidence for the person seeking the
truth,

Once, A'isha (RAA), out of jealousy, said that Safiyyah (RAA) was short and
made other remarks. The Prophet (SAW) rejoined,

'You have said a word that, had it been mixed with the water of the ocean, it would
have darkened it,' Narrated by Abu Dawud, Tirmidhi and Baihaqi.

The scholars, such as Imaam an-Nawawi (RH) have also come to the same
conclusion from the simplicity of the hadith above and others that go along with it.

So even though Safiyyah (RAA) was short in reality, it was still ghiba, for
indeed it did bother her to be referred to in that manner. So from this we
can gather, whether it is the truth or not, if the person dislikes it, it is
unacceptable and ghiba to do this to the person.

And in reality, to keep the company of those who are doing this act is the
worst, for what they are doing is indeed wretched and the stench that comes from
this act is reprehensible.

Jaabir ibn 'Abdullah (RAA) said, 'We were with the Prophet (SAW) and the wind
brought a foul odour our way. The Prophet (SAW) said, "Do you know what that
odour is? It is the odour of those who backbite the believers," Collected by Imaam
Ahmad ibn Hanbal (RH) and classified as sahih.

And if one should witness that someone is having ghiba done against them, then that
person should stand up and defend the one in his absence, as the case was with
'Abdullah ibn Mas'ud (RAA).

Once, a man began to slander someone in his presence, to which 'Abdullah ibn
Mas'ud (RAA) replied, 'By Allah, I know nothing but good about him.' The man
continued his slander two more times, to which Ibn Mas'ud replied the same.

This shows the refusal to accept ghiba being done against a Muslim brother or
sister. He stood firm for the principle. It makes sense that he should have, for he
was only imitating his teacher, the Prophet (SAW).

Once, one of the mother of the believers, Safiyyah (RAA) came to the Prophet
(SAW) weeping about the fact that some of the other wives, in particular A'isha
(RAA), kept mocking her height and her Jewish ancestry.

When the Prophet (SAW) heard this, he said, 'You go and tell them that your uncle
is the Prophet Harun, your father the Prophet Musa and you are married to a
Prophet. And what of A'isha's ancestors? All kuffar.'

When Safiyyah returned and spoke these words, the ghiba stopped and she was
vindicated. This all comes from protecting the honour of the believers.

It is as the Prophet (SAW) said,

'Whoever defends the honour of a believer who is being slandered in his
absence, it is upon Allah to deliver him from the Fire,' collected by Imaam Ahmad
(RAA) and classified as hasan.

Those who are defending the honour of any Muslim brother or sister should see
themselves as nothing more than warriors, defending the honour of those who are
unable to defend themselves due to the cowardice of those who would attack them
from behind their back.

And what cowards they are, those people who mention others behind their back.
Rather than stand firm and confront the person over whatever grievance they might
have, they stand back and whisper, as the Shaitan does, about the person and try
to enlist other people to lose their good deeds and waste time.

Worst of all, the person is trying to find others to dine on raw flesh with
them, most of all in public in the front of the other believers. And who
enjoys the taste of raw flesh with the blood still coursing through it?

'Abdullah ibn Mas'ud (RAA) narrated, 'Once we were sitting with the Prophet
(SAW), then a man stood up and left, then a man in the gathering spoke ill of him.
The Prophet (SAW) said to that man, "Clean your teeth." The man said, "Why? I
haven't eat anything."

The Prophet (SAW) said, "You have eaten the flesh of your brother,"'
Collected by Tabaraani and classified as sahih.

But what of those who think it is wrong, but they don't have the strength to raise
their voice above the voices of ghiba and the stench that it brings.
Well, the least they can do is get up and leave their company, as Allah
(SWT) has said,

'And those who do not bear witness to falsehood and when they pass by some evil
talk or act, they pass it by with righteousness and dignity,' Surat
ulFurqaan, ayah 72.

So the very least that can be done by those too cowardly to raise their
voices for their Muslim brothers and sisters being slandered is not to be a
part of it. For to be a part of it will make you accountable on the Day of
Resurrection.

But as we look at all of the evils of mentioning the believer in his
absence, we then are left with a question. Is there any time whatsoever that we may
speak about someone in their absence?

What about emergency situations of life and death? What should one do or is there
any excuse whatsoever? In cases such as these, there have been exceptions left to
the Muslims.

These acceptions, however must be understood in light of the fact that the intent is
for protecting the honour and principle of the Shari'a and those involved.

Imaam an-Nawawi (RH) in his commentary on Sahih Muslim and the other 'Ulama
(RHM) have also isolated out times when ghiba is permissible.

TIMES WHEN GHIBA IS PERMISSIBLE,

1. The one being oppressed. It is permissible for the oppressed that he
should tell the ruler, the Qaadi or other than those two for whoever has the
authority or ability to stop his oppressor. So when he says, 'So and so has
oppressed me or did this to me,' it is permissible.

2. Seeking help to change an evil or refuting and repudiating the
disobedient one to the right and proper conduct. So he says to whoever he hopes
has the ability, 'So and so is doing this thing.' And so he pushes him (the
disobedient person) from it (the act) and any other things.

3. Seeking fatwa in a matter by him saying to the mufti, 'So and so or my
father, my brother, my husband/wife has oppressed me due to this and what is
there for me to do about that. What is the way to rectify that or what is my defence
or way to take his oppression away from me?' and other things besides that.

So this is permissible for necessity and rectifying things that he should
say regarding a man, husband/wife, parent, child or whatever his issue is.
And showing the permissibility of this is the hadith of Hind (the wife of
Abu Sufyaan) and her words, 'Abu Sufyaan is a cheap man,' as collected by Sahih
Muslim.

Thus he would withhold from her the right of her maintenance, which is a
right that the woman has. Therefore, the woman has the right to secure her right.

The same can be said for the case of Faatimah ibn Qais in a sahih hadith, in which
she asked the Prophet (SAW) about counsel in the matter of two people who had
asked to marry her. About the first one, he said that he was not good for anything
and about the second one he said that he beats the women of his household.

This is a matter that it is permissible to speak about, for in marriage the
honour of the woman must also be protected. And the frankness that must be
expressed in preserving the right of the woman in that case must take precedence,
as the Prophet (SAW) showed.

4. Warning the Muslims from evil. And that is from the permissible ways and those
who do evil and harm are harmed by speaking about them and being witnessed
against and being classified (as evil, tyrants, etc) and explained (what was it that
they did which was wrong. What was their innovation).

And this act indeed is permissible by ijmaa', but it is compulsory that it
be for upholding the Shari'a. And from it (the Shari'a) is giving
information of his (the person doing harm) shortcomings and evil in front of the
conference or consultation in connection with him.

And from this point is when you see someone purchasing something harmful, or a
slave, theft, committing fornication, drunkenness or anything like that by you
mentioning that which is purchased.

The same goes for a person who is a kaafir. That person, whoever he or she is is
not safe from having ghiba done on them, for their flesh is not
preserved, due to their worshipping others than Allah. Those who make shirk in
this manner are not entitled to preserve their shirk and be left to
themselves by the sincere believers.

5. That the person is someone who is making obvious and public his
rebellious sin or bid'a. Then the person may be mentioned by name in order to
warn people of him. And it is not permissible to do this name calling any other time
except with sufficient reason.

6. To have familiarity with a person. This is when a person is known by a
nickname or title like, the short one, the blind one the cut one and others
things that are permissible to know him (the one in question) by. An example is that
there may be a plethora of persons with the name Haamid, therefore to diffrentiate
between them, one is called, 'Short Haamid,' another 'Tall Haamid,' another 'West
Indian Haamid' and so on. This is so that we might not have to spend so much time
and energy in attempts to figure out who we are making reference to.

And it is haraam to mention him with it (the nickname) unless it is not
possible to know him with out using it, thus it (the nickname) takes
priority. And Allah knows best.

But with each one of these permissible situations, before one declares the
ghiba that he or she is doing as permissible, there must be the intention
behind it and it must match with the Shari'a. For if it does not, the person
is merely hiding behind the cloak of holiness while slandering and hurting
others.

The most sincere hope of the preparer of this article is that the believers
in the West, East and in every other place where there are believers will
cease from ghiba and leave these vain pursuits, insha'allah.

ISREAL ON THE HORIZON OF ETHNIC WARFARE;
The Voice of the Shepardim

As the society of Israel unravels before the very eyes of its' citizens, they are left
wondering what to do. The violence is increasing in Israel and no one is sure
exactly what to do about it.

A large restuarant in Israel, known as Yehuda Avazi, was attacked and wrecked
by a Jewish mob in an attempt to destroy all traces that the place had ever existed.

This was horrifying for the customers of this restuarant, who were all very delighted
and ready to have a feast at one of the most famous restuarants in Israel.

But the delight turned to fear when the mob, comprised of some 2,000 people,
rushed up to the store to attack during the Jewish holiday of Yom Kippur, which is
supposed to be a day of fasting and repentance from that years sins.

It came as a complete surprise, due to the fact that it occurred in the normally
tranquil city of Tel Aviv, which is a very quaint Mediterranean town in Israel. As
the city is known for its' tolerance, everyone, even the Arabs, who think they have
'integrated' into Israeli society, were taken aback.

The restuarant, located in the Hatikva district of Tel Aviv which is racially
comprised of North African and Middle Eastern Jews known as Sephardim, was
targeted due to the fact that it employed Arabs.

As the siege of Yehuda's began, the crowd chanted over and over again, 'Death to
the Arabs.' Soon fires were set, windows were smashed, and there were attempts
made to barracade the Arab waiters in the back kitchen area so as to burn them
alive.

But by this time the Israeli police had arrived and were attempting to control the
crowd. This proved to be easier said than done. The horror continued on with the
police bringing very little order to the situation.

With all the hatred and fires being set, one would think that the store was owned by
Arabs, but no, it was owned by an Ashkenazim (Eastern European) Jew,
considered arch-enemies by the Sephardim.

Thus the enmity is also ethnic. For so many years, the Sephardim were called by
the Ashkenazim, 'Jewish Arabs' the pain was unbearable. Many times, they would
be beaten up by Israeli military and police and the women would be sexually
assaulted.

When asked why they had did this to fellow Jews, the Ashkenazim Jews would
reply with surpise, 'We thought they were Bedouin Arabs.' Thus the issue was not
the ethics of rape, but who you are licensed to rape.

The hatred that the Sephardim had been trying to hold down for their own Jewish
brethren, along with the hatred for the Arabs, who they share so much in common
with, came out in one big yell on that night.

There will be more to come. As the visage of the united Israel is pulled down from
the wall of lies, we will see more of the secret life that Israel does not want us to
see, more of the inner hatred that they do not want us to view.

The world was able to see a small peak of this bigotry, when in 1992, when Falashi
Jews from Ethiopia were air lifted into Israel, they were refused blood tests and
vaccination, for they were all believed to have had AIDS, being from Africa and all.

Any Falasha Jews who had or attempted to donate blood in the future would be
rejected or would have their donations thrown out. All of this done to a people
who are supposed to be your brethren in faith.

But Israel is a time bomb, and no one knows who has the detonator. But time will
show us how long the 'people of Zion' have before they are once again vomited out
of that tiny strip of land.

AEDOPHILIA;
Another Symptom and Evil Kufr

Had this story involved anyone else, we could have easily turned our eyes and our
ears away from it. Had it been no closer to home, we could have forgotten about it
and consigned it to just another example of the sickness of the West.

However, the problem has hit home. Recently, one of the world's largest
pornographic rings was raided by the police in a supposed attempt to crack down
on child pornagraphy in Britain.

The crackdown came to the doors of the Wonderland Club, an organisation
known for the kidnapping of children and their sexual exploitation. Seven of the
organisers were arrested and given sentences ranging from 6 months to 3 years, all
for the abuse of innocent children.

Stacks of photo albums of child being sexually abused were confiscated from the
premises of these sick and deranged people.

Now comes the strongest and most bitter pill to swallow. One of the men, 31 year
old 'Ali Ahmad, a cab driver from central London and avid motorcyclist was one of
the collectors of this filth.

How is it that this person, born into a Muslim household, could involve himself with
and in the process become part of world perversion via the internet?

The answer is at once simple and easy to provide. This phenomenon comes with
living with, eating and drinking with and having sympathy with kuffar. For just as a
duck would not allow wolf pups into its' ranks, so kuffar would not allow a devout
Muslim into the ranks of the sexual deviants.

With that in mind, Mr. Ahmad must have been just as much a party to kufr as the
other six demons. And that would not have been possible unless he grew up with
them and was akin to the same sexual impulses as them.

We are susceptible to the same disgusting fate living in the West. Daily, we are
bombarded with pictures of naked men and women, and at times advertising for
homosexual relationships on billboards or on the television.

Our children go to school and play on the same playground as the sons and
daughters of sexual predators or paedophiles. They watch the television and watch
the proponents and supporters of corruption and sexual vice.

However, those in Britain should observe the United States to be sure of what is
coming next. NAMBLA (The North American Man Boy Love Association) is
lobbying in the United States for recognition of Man/boy marriages by law.

And for what purpose would the United States have in denying them, NAMBLA
reasons, as people in the United States, particularly in Hawaii, can marry animals as
well as same sex marriages?

So what is to stop them from being forbidden by U.S. law? The United States has
already gone so far and with each year edges closer to civil and military unrest. This
is all part of the loss of society and the corruption and striping of the Shari'a.

Man-made law is what set the pace for every act. Man-made law is what set the
pace for every haraam being made halaal. Man-made law is what set the pace for
every halaal to become haraam.

Innocent children are not safe from perverts and those who protect their right to be
perverted. It is indeed interesting that Britain is so harsh against child pornography.
Indeed they used to be the same way in the United States, until it was decided that
it should be legalised, just like gambling, so that the government might control it.

By doing this, the government said that it was 'regulating' prostitution, gambling,
alcohol and the like which they had legalised. Why have a black market, they
opined? Why not legalise it and then we can tax it and control it.

Thus the original vigilance against prostitution and pornography in the United States
was done away with once these evils were legalised. The same thing, although it
will take longer in British society due to their conservative bent, will no doubt come
to Britain.

At first there will be the hatred, but after some time, organisations, like NAMBLA,
will spring up in Britain. They will say that there is no way to regulate or control it
currently, so why not put it under government mandate. Then will come, as has
already occured in the United States, laws to protect it and prosecute those who
resist this new 'pragmatic approach' to these evils.

WORLD WEALTH AND CURRENCY;
Bloody Riba and Jewish (Zionist) Manipulation

What would happen if one of us were to take the currency of the United States or
even Britain to the bank, and upon arrival ask for its’ value in gold? If the teller did
not laugh directly in your face, it may be the case that he/she would tell you that
he/she is not able to do that, due to the fact that the United States (or British)
currency has not been on the gold reserve for more than 25 years.

Down trodden, you would have to take your currency, which you now know is
inflated like a balloon and worth nothing more than the dust in your pocket and
slink out of the bank before the snickers of laughter surrounded you. But how
would you know unless you ask? Many people in these two ‘rich’ countries do not
know this. Infact, they would be surprised to find that their money is being used in
the largest casino on Earth, the stock market. And to know that they could ‘lose
all’ or ‘take a little something home’ would be a shock to a great many of the
working man’s community.

But this is the reality that we are facing in this day and time. One institution,
originally started for the common good of the United States citizens has actually
grown into a financial octopus, stretching its’ wretched tentacles across the Earth
and choking into submission all of the other world’s currencies until they give up the
gold reserve. The only ones to valiantly resist this death grasp have been
Switzerland and now the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, the former having a gold
standard and the latter not dealing with any currency at the moment, but rather,
hard commodities.

But the former is being pursued constantly by a Mr. Alan Greenspan to join the
‘prosperous nations’ who have currency that is little more than kindling for the
camp fires. There is most certainly a machinery behind this awful turn of events.
There is an institution that is responsible for giving the world’s populace this false
sense of security. That institution is the Federal Reserve Bank.

Federal Reserve Bank History

It was the year 1923, on the day of December 23 when the then President
Woodrow Wilson signed in to law the Federal Reserve Act. The objective of this
act was to

1. Take the power of money out of the hands of small banks that were either
supervised or owned by the public and putting them into the hands of private
owners.

2. To centralise the entire banking system making it responsible to a handful (60 to
be exact) of private investors and owners, who to this day still remain anonymous.

3. to slowly eliminate the gold reserve from the population.

4. To exercise control and dominance over economies.

5. To use economic ‘crashes’ and ‘recessions’ to bring those who rebel in line with
the desires of those controlling the currency (s).

But before we talk about four and five, we need to take about 1-3, which made it
possible for 4 and 5 to take place. The excuse that was given by President
Woodrow Wilson for this act, which would place the power of the United States
economy in the hands of a few powerful Jewish brokers, was to do the following,

1) Constant rising interest rates

2) Seasonal interest rate increases

3) Liquidity crises and the famous ‘bank runs’ that we hear of in history

More of their intentions becomes clear in the preamble to the Act where they say
that the purpose of the Federal Reserve is ‘to provide for the establishment of
Federal Reserve banks, to furnish an ELASTIC CURRENCY, to afford means of
RE-discounting paper, to establish a more effective SUPERVISION of banking in
the United States, and for OTHER purposes.’

The signing in of the Federal Reserve Act was to bring the panacea of centralisation
to the so-called unstable condition of the National Banking System. But was this
paradise really achieved. No, not at all for the common man. What resulted as a
series of moves so sinister that the serious researcher of them can only look in
horror and shout, ‘Subhaanallah’ either out of grief, surprise or fear.

One of the first moves to secure numbers 1-3 of the five points above was to
station 12 Federal Banks (including the one that is currently in Richmond, Virginia)
around the country as places of deposit for the required reserves that had been
established for the original banks in New York City and other localities.

The next dramatic move outlined in the act was the rule requiring that private banks
(at the time, these so-called private banks were held by owners that we knew and
saw, from the community and public life. It was not unknown for the people in the
neighbourhood to know who owned to bank up the street 50 years ago) hold
reserves directly in a Federal Reserve bank.

The force in this act resulted in great consequences. The reserves once held in the
hands of the public in trusted banks went into this shadow Federal Reserve. No
one knew who was behind it, or exactly how much this bank had or what it was
doing with the reserves. Strangers came to handle the money of the general public.
Those who grew up and knew the tellers and employees at their bank by their first
names were now surprised to find strangers in their place, asking for their
identification and account number.

The most important power given the new central bank, however, was the authority
to issue currency and to create bank reserves at least partly independently of the
nation’s monetary gold reserves.

What this meant was that the Fed Reserve could issue currency even without the
government’s permission, in addition to the fact that they could print it completely
independent from the government, thus the FRB was autonomous from the United
States government. You may say, however, ‘But brother, they also had to match it
with the gold reserves.’ This is true and not true.

The Fed could create currency and reserves as long as the Federal Reserve banks
kept a minimum 40 percent gold reserve against Federal Reserve notes, which
were paper currency, and a 35 percent gold reserve against deposits held by
private banks at Federal Reserve banks.

What this did, is it slowly devalued the power of gold, for the monetary units were
no longer being matched directly with the gold reserve, but some 60 percent of the
currency in circulation was not being backed by any gold. This is when this so
called floating currency began. This was currency that has no gold to back it, thus it
is as worthless as a third eye for a blind man.

These gold reserves in the meantime made the FRB respect the gold reserve, even
if with insolence, outwardly, but inwardly the war against hard currency with value
was on. Although the gold reserve was to be respected, when the FRB plan began,
the gold reserve was so large that the requirements for the FRB to have atleast
40% in gold to back the currency could not be enforced nor monitored, due to the
fact that FRB was now in control of the currency, its’ printing and its’ distribution.

So while the FRB had to maintain a quasi-respect for the gold reserve, they were
slowly removing the respect for gold and flooding the market with unbacked
currency. This happened due to the fact that no one could control the amount of
notes issued nor the amount of bank reserve deposits that could be created by the
FRB without monitoring them, which was forbidden by law.

Why still to this day, the FRB is the only institution in the United States that issues
no tax return for itself, nor does it issue its’ earnings. And this is the institution that
creates currency and is in charge of reporting oversights and the like.

The next problem that the FRB had to taken was the people’s confidence in the
presence of the gold standard. Before the FR Act, people were accepting of the
gold reserve as a measure against their currency, and later we will cover why this is
the case.

But this had to change in order for the people’s confidence to be shifted from that
of the gold reserve to the FRB, which is why in the FR Act, there is no listing for a
strategy or mandate for resisting deflation or inflation rates. What happened is that
the FRB was given power over these actions. This might need further elaboration
to understand the evil being perpetrated.

Earlier, the gold is what was used to bring order to and balance inflation and
deflation. However, the FRB was given control over INFLATION and
DEFLATION, which means they had the power to CAUSE inflation or deflation
when they saw fit. This is why the control, printing and distribution of money was
handed to them. The ups and downs of the economy that used to happen due to
the fluctuating value of gold came to be something engineered by wicked men in an
office room over coffee and doughnuts.

The hope of the Jewish bankers behind the FRB was that the United States could
be taken off of the gold reserve before or in the year 1914. However, when World
War I came, this objective was not met, so the plan for the establishment of the
FRB had to wait. Thus from 1914-1923, the U.S. remained on the gold reserve,
much to the chagrin of some highly influential people in positions of power. But their
patience proved to be wise, for they realised their plan in the FR Act that we
mentioned above.

This happened due to a Jewish-friendly president who was outwitted by a Jewish
lobby and plenty of graphs and pie-charts predicting disaster for the United States
unless the president brought in this conspiratorial and controversial institution.

But the war, which was in the first place started by the child of Israel to set in place
the final blows to finish the Islamic Khilaafa, which at that time was the largest
institution that had a full gold currency that was based on gold matching every coin
of currency. This had to be removed in order for the Jews to realise their objective.

For in that time, if the Jewish brokers had said that gold reserves no longer work,
someone would have rejoined, ‘What of the Muslims, then? They match every coin
of their currency with gold standard, and they don’t have hardly any inflation.’ Thus
the defense had to be eliminated before the argument could be submitted.

At the end of WWI in 1919, the United States had accumulated a large deficit.
This deficit gave the FRB, established in 1923, the ability to use its’ powers for
what we had mentioned above. People were so concerned about the United States
falling into disrepair, that the ‘emergency’ FR Act was not read over with
thoroughness by the general public. Thus that which took place above was given
legitimacy to take place due to ‘necessity.’

From that point on, inflation continued to go up, even with the promises outlined
above for eliminating quick rises in inflation. It may be asked, ‘How could inflation
rise after the war when wars are supposed to be good for economies aren’t they?’
This is true, but after the war, there is a clean up effort that also must be done. And
some of this clean up is economic, if there was military co-operation that was done.
There are also debts to be payed on fuel that was used, bullets shot, rifles fired,
uniforms worn and used and shoes that are worn on the battle field.

These things indeed caught up with the United States. There is also the reality that
those people employed during the war to replace those workers absent and
overseas in war are no longer required upon the arrival of the original job holders
from overseas.. Thus unemployment also goes on the rise. Due to unemployment,
people turn to alcohol and drugs, which in turn leads to crime, children born out of
wedlock and rape for women who do not consent their bodies to sexual predators.

But the FRB allowed the economy to stay reasonably stable and actually cushioned
the United States’ fragile economy. But this favour was not out of good will. During
this time, the FRB was preparing for its’ most dramatic power move. From the
years 1919-1929, massive amounts of money, much more than that which the gold
reserve could keep up with was created, printed and distributed in the population.

This would later bring inflation, but for the time being, the FRB kept inflation rates
low and gave loans at a low rate of interest. But when 1929 came, the moment of
infamy was upon the United States, and indeed the rest of the globe’s economies
who were also coherts with the 60 criminals in the FRB who would come to only
be known as ‘the wise elders.’

An incredible crash in the United States economy occurred. So serious was it, that
people were rioting, stealing and selling any and everything. Some people buried
money in the back yard of their houses to keep it safe. No one knew what would
happen from one day to the next. After that, the former generously lowered interest
rates soured, houses were foreclosed on, businesses that went bankrupt absorbed
and further banking institutions became privatised. The FRB had struck and with
that fatal blow had sealed the fate of the gold reserve as well as those who would
put their confidence in it.

Benjamin Strong, the then governor of the FRB branch in New York then brought
up the gold standard above its’ minimum so that it appeared that the gold was
further being matched with the currency. However this was only a smoke screen,
for while the gold reserves went up, large portions of it were being sold to private
buyers, for example, the Rothschild family. Purchases such as these from powerful
private individuals came to be what was called a ‘security purchase.’ This was
done to keep things in check.. What happened is that the gold policy was slowly
stepping out of the picture.

Through the United States worst depression, the FRB and those associated with it
became more wealthy than many people could imagine. All of this took place in the
space of 7-10 years in the 1920’s. Thus most of the U.S. and world’s gold supply
would go into private collection in a matter of years. But how? This is how. In the
early 1920’s, the international gold standard was deflated and the prices in gold
fell, making it easy to buy. This makes sense, due to the fact that the private buyers
of it could then set the prices for whoever they wanted to sell it to next.

Other private buyers would buy from them and over time, the gold standard would
be spread among these brokers and purchasers. Thus, when the gold went on the
market for sale, extremely wealthy people would acquire the gold wealth of an
entire country.

And when the time came, the FRB and its’ allies struck, devalueing gold and
keeping the U.S. on hard times for quite some time. Inflation began to steadlily rise
with the creation of more and more currency and the disappearance of more and
more gold all of the way into the 1960’s. The U.S. dollar and all of the world’s
major currencies had been linked to the gold standard under an agreement known
as the Bretton Woods System (a system formed again, yes by Jews), which took
place in the town of Bretton Woods in New Hampshire after WWII.

Under the terms of the agreement, the U.S. had pledged to maintain convertibility
of the dollar into gold at $35 per ounce. But with the constant purchasing of gold
and the spinning out of control of the economy, the gold reserve was eliminated.
This was due to the fact that the FRB lowered the interest rates and let the people
have their fun in the 1920’s, but when the people had overspent and had
overstepped their bounds, FRB made their move with their allies.

After the 1920’s, the FRB lost its’ benevolent demeanour and began to take steps
to consolidate its’ hold on the U.S. and world’s economies.

But there were others that did try to save the gold reserve for they understood
what the tactics of the FRB entailed. But their efforts were too futile and too late.
The BWS would be disintegrated in 1973, putting an end to a gold reserve and
making the dollar and most of the world’s other currencies empty notes of promise.

Some people, after looking over this, may still be wondering about the three
promises that they made in their speech above. Those can be answered simply.
The promises were merely a deception, just as much as the signing of the bill to
give the FRB power was a dark and evil deception.

As far as the constant rising of interest rates, this was not the case. Interest would
rise indeed, but the standard would match that. Inflation would come a reality when
the prices in gold fluctuated. But there had never been a crash in the entire time that
the reserve system was in use. And those who are supporters of FRB are hard
pressed to bring any documentation of a ‘gold crash’ akin to that of the one in
1929, courtesy of the FRB.

As far as liquidity, this would come when there was a lose of confidence by the
public in the currency. This came from printing too much currency and off setting
the gold. When this came, there would be a run on the bank, which means that the
people would ask for their money back in gold. Under the reserve system, people
would receive just that, which would give them the ability to buy when paper
currency had fallen in the people’s eyes.

With gold, the people had a precious metal that they could buy food and other
items with that would never lose confidence from the people. For who would
refuse gold nuggets. But the FRB stopped this safety measure and effectively
robbed the people. What happened when the gold standard was lost in 1973 and it
became illegal to possess gold nuggets and solid gold brick for personal use by the
populous was that there was only paper.

Thus when the great crash occurred, the people were greeted with only more
paper currency. And for even more humiliation, they were only given 10% pf what
was originally in their account. Why? The FRB had brought through new legislation
that only gave the one who fell upon hard times in an economic crash or a bank
robbery a meager 10% of what was in their account. Thus one having wealth
grossing $100,000 in the bank, in a economic crisis would not receive its’ value in
gold, nor even its’ full amount. Rather, he would receive $10,000 in the same
currency that he is trying to get rid of in his time of need for solid commodities.

But where is the gold? With the private purchasers and buyers who hoard it in
basements and vaults, for example the Rothschilds who value it every day in
London at 10:30 AM and 3:30 PM.

All of this brings to mind what Allah had said about this people. And who are the
people behind this horror. It is the Children of Israel, who we have long been
warned against in the Book of Allah. Listen to the chilling prophecy that Allah
delivers to the believers,

‘And We have ordained for the Children of Israel in the Book: You will do
corruption in the Earth twice and you will become very oppressive and arrogant.
So when the promise came for the first of the two, We sent against you Our slaves
who were inclined to terrible warfare. They entered the most inner portions of your
homes, and the promise was fulfilled. And We gave you a victory over them. And
We helped you with wealth and children and caused you to increase in power.
Then we said, ‘If you do good, it is for your ownselves. And if you do evil, it is
against yourselves,’ Surat ulIsraa’, ayaat 4-7.

Thus this is the first time that the Jews had rebelled against Allah, in which the
Babylonians came and the Jews were taken into captivity. This was one of the
disasters for the Jews. But Allah gave them victory after some time. But the main
point was that they indeed did do mischief in the Earth. But let us now read what
the second prophecy mentions,

‘Then, when the second promise was fulfilled, We caused your enemy to disgrace
your faces and enter the Masjid (alAqsa) as they did before and to level and
destroy completely all that came into their hands’, Surat ulIsraa’, ayah 7.

But the second part of the prophecy is still continuing. The Jews are still dong
mischief in the Earth. The question is, how long will we wait and look on as they do
their evil, mocking the signs of Allah and using the natural resources and economies
of this planet like their own private business. Just think of it brothers and sisters.
The Jews gave us the paper and tin to hold, and we gave them all of our gold to
keep, store and spend. Who indeed is not using their brain in these days and times?

JIHAD IN THE QURAN;
'Jihad Is Prescribed For You'

The subject of Jihad has ben discussed with particular emphasis and in
considerable detail in the Quran. There is consensus of opinion amongst
researchers of the Quran, that no other particular action has been stated in such
great detail as Jihad. Allah has revealed many Surahs (chapters) in the Quran
primarily to guide the Believers towards this path. The subject of Jihad has been
expressed in many different ways, in numerous verses of the Quran. The verses
explain in detail the clear objective and benefits of Jihad. The status of the Mujahid
is honoured in the Quran and there are many verses which warns of the dangers of
leaving Jihad. There is such great emphasis of this subject, that some commentators
and scholars of the Quran have remarked that the topic of the Quran is Jihad.

The terminology of 'Jihad-Fi-Sabilillah,' which means Jihad in the path of Allah, has
been used in the Quran 26 times and the specific word Qital, which means fighting,
used in the context of fighting in the path of Allah, is mentioned in the Quran 79
times.

There are whole Surahs in the Quran, which have been revealed, expalining the
ruling and virtues of Jihad and admonishing those leaving Jihad; Such as Surah
Anfaal (Also known as Surah Badr) consisting of 10 Rukus and Surah Bara'ah,
which consists of 16 Rukus.

The Surah Baqarah, Nisa, and Maidah have large sections on the topic of Jihad
and in Surah Hadid, the weapons of Jihad is detailed. There are Surahs which are
named after battles, such as Surah Ahzaab (Trenches), Qital (Fighting), Fath
(Victory) and Saff (Rows). The title of these Surahs clearly illustrates the subject
matter of Jihad.

In Surah Adiyat, and oath has been take on the horses of the Mujahideen and
further in Surah Nasr, worldwide revolution and the spreading of Islam has been
mentioned through Jihad.

The truth is that a Muslim who reads the Quran with devotion is determined to
reach the battlefield in order to attain the reality of Jihad.

It is solely for this reason that the Kuffar conspire to keep the Muslims far away
from this understanding of the Quran, knowing that Muslims who understand the
Quran, will not distance themselves from Jihad.

FINAL NOTE
What Do We Want?

This publication is not aimed at separating or causing too much debate among sincere Muslims. Without news from truthful sources, the only alternative is to take from our enemies; those who enjoin falsehood and forbid truth. Insha'llah, our aim is to provide Islamic education, news and discussion to incite the believers into action. We are working toward the sincere education of Muslims, while continuing to learn and champion the way of the Prophet (SAW) and those Rightly Guided (RAA).

How can you help?

By telling others about this website and helping to distribute this information. Encourage Muslims to ask questions and participate on our discussion board. In addition, be patient with us when we are revising and preparing new content. Get the word out in your community that we are not funded by anyone other than Allah -- alhamdulillah. Thus, our opinions come from our understanding of the opinions of the Siddiqun, not from government scholars, evil rulers, and kuffar.

Finally, make continious du`aa for the Mujaahidin and the Ummah that Allah grant all of us victory and reward.

BACK TO AL-JIHAAD