|
22 May 1991
Fireworks
Mr. Nigel
Griffiths : To ask the Secretary of
State for Trade and Industry if he will
make a statement on his responsibilities
under the Fireworks Act 1951 and on his
discharging of them.
Mr. Forth : I have been asked to
reply.
Our responsibilities under this Act
relate to sections 4 and 7 which deal
with Health and Safety at work
considerations under the terms of the
Health and Safety at Work, etc. Act 1974.
Additionally, explosives inspectors
appointed by the Health and Safety
Executive during their visits to
factories, magazines or stores have a
power under section 1(1) of the Fireworks
Act 1951 to take away for testing a
sample of fireworks which they consider
may present dangers when in the
possession of the public. This power is
enforced where appropriate and necessary.
The remainder of the provision in the
Fireworks Act 1951 are properly the
responsibility of my right hon. Friend
the Secretary of State for Trade and
Industry.
Mr. Nigel Griffiths : To ask the
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
if he will introduce legislation to
require licensing of all fireworks to be
used only for properly organised firework
displays, put on by trained people, and
set up a national training scheme.
Mr. Redwood : The firework industry
already has a training scheme for
organisers of displays. Like the hon.
Member, I want to see fireworks used
properly so that there is pleasure rather
than tragedy on bonfire night. Requiring
licences would cut down the number of
good organised displays open to people on
bonfire night, but would not of itself
guarantee safety.
Mr. Nigel Griffiths : To ask the
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
what recent incidents have occurred
involving category 4 fireworks ; and if
he will make a statement on his policy
towards the control of such fireworks.
Mr. Redwood : I do not have a
breakdown of accidents for different
categories of fireworks. However,
category 4--large display--fireworks
should not be available in the shops.
Most are imported and their import
licence prohibits suppliers from selling
them through the shops, while for their
part United Kingdom manufacturers refrain
from doing so.
7 June 1991
Control of
Explosives
Mr. Wiggin :
To ask the Secretary of State for the
Home Department if he will state the
number of cases where explosives other
than fireworks have caused accidents in
the home in the past five years.
Mr. Peter Lloyd : Accurate figures
are not available. In 1989, my hon.
Friend the Member for Cardiff, North (Mr.
Jones) drew my noble Friend's attention
to an unfortunate accident in his
constituency when a young boy was badly
injured while playing with materials used
in the home loading of ammunition.
Mr. Wiggin : To ask the Secretary of
State for the Home Department if he will
bear the extra cost to the police of
carrying out inspections under the
proposed control of explosives
regulations.
Mr. Peter Lloyd : The cost of
operating the statutory enforcement
powers to be conferred on the police as a
result of the proposed control of
explosives regulations, which should not
result in a significant additional burden
upon police resources, will be met by
police funding in the usual way.
Mr. Wiggin : To ask the Secretary of
State for the Home Department if he will
state the number of cases in the last
convenient period where explosives have
been stolen from private homes.
Mr. Peter Lloyd : There is no legal
requirement to report thefts of
explosives. Accurate figures for thefts
from private homes are not available, but
five are known to have been reported by
police since 1969.
Mr. Wiggin : To ask the Secretary of
State for the Home Department if he will
now postpone the control of explosives
regulations to allow increased
consultation time for the guidance notes
to be fully studied by all interested
parties.
Mr. Peter Lloyd : It is not normal
practice for the Health and Safety
Executive to consult on guidance notes.
They represent an explanation of the
regulations and advice on compliance. The
proposed control of explosives
regulations have been subject to full
consultation. We see no need for
postponement.
Mr. Wiggin : To ask the Secretary of
State for the Home Department how long
has been allowed for consultation on the
form of the guidance notes applying to
the new proposed control of explosives
regulations ; and what factors underlay
the decision to set this length of time
for consultation.
Mr. Peter Lloyd : No general
consultation on draft guidance notes
applying to the new proposed control of
explosives regulations has taken place.
Draft guidance notes were sent to a
number of organisations by the Health and
Safety Executive on 3 May 1991. Comments
were requested by 17 May 1991. This time
was set to permit the guidance notes to
be published prior to the draft
regulations coming into force. However,
important comments received after this
date could be taken into account if
printing schedules permitted.
Mr. Wiggin : To ask the Secretary of
State for the Home Department if he will
place in the Library the case histories
that led to the proposal by the Health
and Safety Executive of new control of
explosive regulations.
Mr. Peter Lloyd : The new proposed
control of explosives regulations are
part of the ongoing modernisation of the
Explosives Act 1875 and related
regulations. This forms part of the
Health and Safety Commission's programme
of work to review and reform existing
legislation. So far a number of new
explosives regulations have been made.
The draft control of explosives
regulations are the latest proposals.
These proposals are not driven by
particular case histories.
Return to
Parliament Site
Go to Menu Page
|
|