|
(19) Staffordshire police
force were only able to submit sample data for
convictions at magistrates courts for the year
2000. Although sufficient to estimate higher
orders of data, these data are not robust at a
detailed level and have been excluded from this
table
(20) Data for these offences are not separately
identifiable on the Home Office Court Proceedings
Database
Note:
All data are given on a principal offence basis
19 December 2001
Shona McIsaac (Cleethorpes): As we approach
the festive season, with twinkling lights on the
Christmas tree, Christmas cards and present
wrapping, I shall raise the seasonal issue of
fireworks--specifically, their irresponsible and
prolonged misuse.
At the end of October and the beginning of
November, my local paper was inundated with
hundreds of letters of complaint about the misuse
of fireworks--as was I. As a result of those
complaints, the Grimsby Telegraph launched
a campaign for tougher laws on the sale of
fireworks. The response was astonishing: more
than 1,100 people backed the campaign, while only
one person supported the status quo.
I have given the campaign my full backing because
people endure months of misery because of
fireworks. I do not know what happens in the
constituencies of other hon. Members, but it
seems that in north-east Lincolnshire the
firework season starts at the beginning of August.
That is when the noise begins. As soon as the
back-to-school posters go up in Woolworths and
other stores, the fireworks are set off.
That shows that the voluntary code of practice on
the restriction of sales to three weeks before
and one week after 5 November is not working.
There is an increasing use of fireworks.
Christmas is coming up, so we shall see lots of
fireworks. We have them at birthdays, weddings,
parties and the celebrations of many of our
ethnic communities, such as Diwali and other
festivals. Many more fireworks are being used,
thus causing more disturbance to many people.
Although the voluntary code restricts the sale of
fireworks to the period around 5 November, few
people realise that fireworks can also go on sale
at this time of year--from the beginning of
December and into January. People in my
constituency and elsewhere are dreading another
outbreak of explosive mayhem at Christmas and the
new year.
Many elderly people have been writing to me and
to the local paper to complain about fireworks. A
war veteran told me that the war was quieter than
the months of October and November in
Lincolnshire. I am not of a sensitive nature,
but, boy, the noise is atrocious. I have received
complaints from people who run care homes and
residential homes for the elderly, and from mums
with young children and babies. Every time there
is an explosion the babies start crying again, so
the mothers get more and more fractious as the
children get more upset.
The noise affects people who are seriously ill or
recovering from illness; it affects shift workers
and people with pets. Some of the people who got
in touch with me have guide dogs. We forget that
guide dogs are particularly sensitive to noise,
so fireworks can actually disrupt the way in
which they work. That is a danger for people who
are blind.
The problem is not only one of noise. Increased
criminal damage is associated with the misuse of
fireworks. Every year there are reports of phone
boxes being damaged by fireworks. People play
tricks by putting fireworks into car exhausts and
letter boxes. Fireworks are thrown at
pedestrians, drivers and cyclists. They are
thrown at people's windows and doors. There is
also cruelty to animals, including tying
fireworks to family pets that happen to get in
the way of the louts who misuse fireworks--as
happens in my constituency. There is a culture of
fear and we must tackle it.
I love organised displays and I certainly want
them to continue, but it is time to toughen up
the voluntary code. A few years ago, I was
burgled in early November, and noise was a factor.
The dogs next door normally bark when someone
they do not know walks down the street, but
because of the noise of the fireworks they were
barking anyway. The police told me that there is
an increase in burglary at that time of year
because deterrents such as barking dogs are not
as effective as usual. Incidentally, the cats
climbed up my new drapes and shredded them, but
that is not as important as the fact that people
are burgled at a time of year when criminals can
use noise to disguise their activities.
The firework safety regulations of 1997 state
that sales should be restricted to people "apparently"
over 18, but there is no requirement to show
proof of age. Certain categories of firework can
be sold to people as young as 16. Average 16-year-olds
have many restrictions on their lives. They are
not allowed to vote, to buy drinks in pubs--although
we all know that plenty of them do--or to drive
cars, and in England, they cannot get married
without parental consent. Yet we allow them
access to explosives. That is unacceptable.
Yes, there are penalties for selling fireworks to
people under 18. There are also penalties for
discharging and throwing fireworks in the street,
but how many prosecutions are there for such
offences every year? They are few and far between.
The code is not working. We must toughen it up
because loutish elements misuse fireworks,
causing much disturbance and a culture of fear--especially
among the groups that I mentioned.
Early in the new year, my hon. Friend the Member
for Brent, North (Mr. Gardiner) is to bring in a
ten-minute Bill on the subject, so I am flagging
up the matter now to give the Government ample
time, before the Bill is introduced, to tighten
up the regulations so that, I hope, 5 November in
2002 and subsequent years will not be as noisy as
before, and people can enjoy a bit of peace and
quiet.
Vernon Coaker (Gedling): In the short time
available, I wish to draw the attention of the
House to three issues; two have national
implications and one relates to my own
constituency.
I very much agree with my hon. Friend the Member
for Cleethorpes (Shona McIsaac) about fireworks.
In the past few weeks, we will all have been
contacted by numerous constituents about the
problems that they have experienced with
fireworks. Indeed, in common with my hon.
Friend's local newspaper, our local newspaper--the
Nottingham Evening Post--launched a
campaign calling on the Government to review
legislation on fireworks. Many of us in the House
have had much correspondence and pressure from
our constituents, and it is incumbent on the
Government to examine how well the current
legislation and regulations are working,
reviewing them to ensure that in future some of
the misery that many of our constituents have
experienced is avoided as far as possible.
The issue is extremely serious. At some point,
the Government will have to examine it to see
what can be done. I appreciate that we can have
as many regulations and reviews as we want, but
at the end of the day we need regulations that
can be enforced on the streets in an effective
and practical way. Certainly, we cannot allow a
situation to continue in which people feel
terrorised for months on end--indeed, almost all
year round. I therefore urge my hon. Friend the
Minister to take up the issue.
Mr. David Amess (Southend, West): Before the
House adjourns for the Christmas recess, I must
briefly raise several points. First, I entirely
agree with the hon. Members for Cleethorpes (Shona
McIsaac) and for Gedling (Vernon Coaker) on
fireworks. I cannot recall receiving so many
letters about fireworks and on firework night I
thought that our house was under siege, as bombs
seemed to be exploding everywhere.
Fireworks no longer produce pretty little stars
and the noises that they make seem to have grown
louder and louder--local residents were
complaining about animals being frightened. I
much prefer organised displays. We should not ban
fireworks, but a ten-minute Bill on the subject
is to be introduced next year and I ask the
Government to consider how such products are
manufactured and whether we can definitively
control the period for which they can be
displayed. I hope that a successful gunpowder
plot does not result next year owing to the crazy
decision we took last night.
Mr. Tyler: The hon. Member for Cleethorpes (Shona
McIsaac) has a great deal of support across the
House for the concern that she has expressed on a
number of occasions about the way in which
fireworks are sold and used. We all know from
constituency experience that the manufacture of
fireworks has reached such pyrotechnic heights
that putting them in the hands of amateurs, let
alone children, is dangerous. I hope that her
message, which was backed up by the hon. Members
for Gedling (Mr. Coaker) and for Southend, West (Mr.
Amess), and is now backed up by me, too, will be
heard by Ministers. Something must be done--things
cannot continue as they are.
Mrs. Angela Browning (Tiverton and Honiton):
I am pleased to .................. The hon.
Member for Cleethorpes (Shona McIsaac) referred
to the problems caused by fireworks. We have all
received letters about them, but it is difficult
to achieve a balance between people wanting to
have genuine fun and people misusing fireworks so
that they cause problems to the elderly, pet
owners and others. I hope that we can have
practical advice from the Government on the
changes that they intend to introduce, because
something needs to be done. The hon. Lady nods,
and I hope that she accepts that I share her
concern about the problem. We need to ensure that
any proposals that the Government introduce are
safe and fairly predictable. It is an offence to
create disturbance at night whether through the
use of fireworks or other means. Therefore, when
people break the law and local authorities have
sufficient evidence of that--that is part of the
problem--they should be brought to account.
Otherwise the word will get round and people will
continue to break the law.
Fireworks
Vernon Coaker: To
ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
what recent assessment she has made regarding the
effectiveness of legislation controlling the (a)
sale and (b) use of fireworks. [23239]
Miss Melanie Johnson: I refer my hon. Friend
to the answer given to my hon. Friend the Member
for Jarrow (Mr. Hepburn) on 13 December 2001, Official
Report, column 943W.
Mr. Weir: To ask the Secretary of State for
Trade and Industry what proportion of persons
injured by fireworks in each of the last five
years were injured by fireworks in (1) (a)
category 3 and (b) category 4 of BS 7114;
[23655]
(2) in (a) Category 1 and (b)
Category 2 of BS 7114. [23673]
Miss Melanie Johnson: We do not collect
information on the BS7114 technical category of
fireworks involved in injuries. Our annual data
collection exercise provides details of the place
of accident, such as public display or private
party, and the type of firework involved, based
on the patient's description. Category 4
fireworks are prohibited from general sale by the
Fireworks (Safety) regulations 1997. We also know
that the majority of injuries are caused in some
way by misuse. We have no evidence of any
correlation between the technical category of
fireworks and the levels of injury.
Mr. Lazarowicz: To ask the Secretary of State
for Trade and Industry how many representations
she has received since 1 October from (a)
hon. Members and (b) members of the public
concerning the use, misuse and sale of fireworks.
[24140]
Ms Hewitt: My Department has received 348
representations from hon. Members and 653
directly from members of the public, concerning a
wide range of issues relating to fireworks.
Return to
Parliament Site
Go to Part One,
January to 30 October 2001
Go to Menu Page
|
|