Theories
on the Start of it all
Despite
the name of the theory, the Big Bang Theory does not explain the bang of
the Big Bang. It tells us more of the aftermath of the bang. The actual
cause and circumstances of the bang are unknown to scientists. A major
problem is the singularity. At the singularity, all the laws of physics
break down and what happens there is anybody's guess.
A
popular theory about this singularity is called the Inflationary
Model of the early Universe. It goes like this.....
The
singularity is a very tiny ball. Inside this ball - at this pressure -
is virtually vacuum. They say virtual since it is empty save
for things called gravitational waves. These waves pulse back and forth
with levels of "high" energy and levels of "low" energy. The Inflationary
Model theorizes that these waves get stuck in "high" energy mode.
This
high energy causes a bulge on the side of the primordial ball of space.
The bulge of high energy quickly expands at an exponential rate.....going
from the size of a proton to roughly that of a basketball in 10^35
of a second.
(That's:
0.00000000000000000000000000000000001/second)
The
high energy would soon lose its punch, and the whole ball of early space
would explode in a massive fireball.
Now
this helps explain several questions I asked in previous pages.
-
1.
The bulge helps to provide for an uneven explosion,
which would lend to the formation of stars and galaxies.
-
2.
Provides for the presence of the Microwave
Background Radiation since everthing would be close enough together, for a long
enough period of time, for energy to
reach all parts of the ball.
So
this theory is a nice way to lead into the Big Bang answering several of
the questions that the Big Bang leaves unanswered. However, there are problems
with model as well.
-
1.
The Inflationary Model calls that the universe
be what is called a "flat" universe. This has yet to be proven and no evidence
that I am aware of, points to this. As current observations show
today, the universe is actually quite "open".
-
2.
The Model also calls for more matter to be
in the universe than what is actually there.......MUCH more. Observations
show that there is only 50 - 80 percent of the amount needed for Inflation
to work. So unless there is a large amount of matter hiding away somewhere,
the Model needs more tweaking.
-
3.
The Inflation Model also calls for the minute
density fluctiations in the Microwave Background Radiation to cluster around what is
called Gaussian distribution. This distribution is like a bell-curve showing
how matter clumps in a random explosion....in essence, it describes the most natural random
dispersion of matter in an explosion possible. Observations now taken by the COBE (Cosmic Background
Explorer) satellite show us that the fluctations vary too much and indeed do not
follow Gaussian distribution. Granted these varied fluctuations are in a particular
part of the sky and are on the limits of the satellite's resolution, but it is
enough to have scientists questioning the viability of the Inflation Theory. The questions
come in becuase if the universe is not as random or as even as thought by Inflation, then
Inflation could not be the answer.
.....and Inflation is best and most viable model provided for by science,
and yet it still has several fatal flaws. This theory however, even though it is
the most up-to-date of science, is not even taught in schools. Rather, the
theory taught in schools is the virtually discarded Big Bang Theory.
**NOTE** See an intresting quote on this subject on an
earlier page.
Back
to the Big Bang Page
Back to the Main Page
On to the Pea Instanton